Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
No. 13-1846
RHAE JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE SUNSHINE HOUSE, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:11-cv-00511-MOC-DCK)
Submitted:
Decided:
November 8, 2013
PER CURIAM:
Rhae Johnson appeals from the district courts entry
of judgment for Defendant in accordance with the jurys verdict.
Johnson
brought
suit
alleging
claims
under
Title
VII
of
the
other
the
evidence;
jurys
the
verdict;
evidence
the
is
district
insufficient
to
court
in
erred
We affirm.
10(c)(1).
portions
of
Although
the
Johnson
trial
provided
proceedings,
she
transcripts
has
not
of
some
provided
district
courts
exclusion
and
admission
of
evidence.
for
the
production
of
the
transcripts
at
government
Powell v.
Estelle, 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir. 1992) (per curiam), abrogn
on other grounds recogd by Diaz v. Collins, 114 F.3d 69, 72
(5th Cir. 1997); Keller v. Prince Georges Cnty., 827 F.2d 952,
954 n.1 (4th Cir. 1987).
Turning to Johnsons challenge to the sufficiency of
the evidence supporting the jurys verdict, we note that Johnson
never filed a post-verdict motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b) in
the
district
court.
As
result,
we
are
foreclosed
from
to
evidence,
she
makes
these
claims
in
largely
or
judgment. *
why
the
courts
errors
warrant
reversal
of
the
See 4th
(4th
raised
Cir.
in
2009)
the
brief
(limiting
in
appellate
accordance
review
with
Fed.
to
R.
arguments
App.
P.
28(a)(9)(A)); Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4
(4th Cir. 2004) (noting that appellate assertions not supported
by argument are deemed abandoned).
We
also
reject
as
wholly
without
merit
Johnsons
of
challenging
the
the
trial.
Further,
effectiveness
of
her
insofar
trial
as
Johnson
counsel
based
is
on
2001); Glick v. Henderson, 855 F.2d 536, 541 (8th Cir. 1988);
Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.
1986) (per curiam).
Johnson fails to establish any basis for overturning
the
district
judgment
courts
and
deny
disposition
of
the
We dispense
with
contentions
are
judgment.
as
moot
appeal
oral
Johnsons
pending
argument
adequately
Accordingly,
motion
filing
because
presented
in
we
of
the
affirm
to
the
suspend
transcript.
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED