Sunteți pe pagina 1din 199

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Part- I
Section-1: Introduction
There is a growing universal demand for well prepared professionals in all disciplines. In
addition, increased pressure has consequently been placed in educational institution to prepare
the required number of qualified professional to fulfill societys need. It is imperative that there
is a large need in the industry for engineers with training and experience, and the academic
should move successfully to fill the need. This is especially true for in the situation of Ethiopia
where there is a lack of well trained and experienced urban engineers.
Therefore, the integration of academic program and exposing students to more practical project
results in well-seasoned and, well-educated professionals.
Thus, this high way design project is intended to equip the students with practical design
reinforcing what they have attained theoretically in the class.
It is already known that, for rapid economic, industrial and cultural growth of any country, a
good system of transportation is very essential. One of the transportation systems that are
economical for developing countries like Ethiopia is road. A well designed road network plays
an important role in transporting people and other industrial products to any direction with in
short time. Roads, to satisfy their intended purpose, must be constructed to be safe, easy,
economical, environmentally friend and must full fill the needs of inhabitants. Being safe, the
number of accidents that can occur will be minimized. Easiness decreases operation cost,
pollution and even time cost. Economical roads assure their feasibility according to their plans
and initiate further construction of roads. Schemes that do not satisfy the needs of localities may
not get the maximum utilization of the surplus man power that is really to exist in the rural
community and also its economical value may also decrease. Therefore, from this project it is
expected to understand and to get acquainted with the above facts by going through on the
following design aspects.

1.1

General Background
1

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

This high way design project is taken from the Hargele - Afder Bare - Yet road project, which
is located in the Eastern part of the country in Somali National Regional State, Afder
Administrative Zone, Afder and Bare Woredas. The project is intended to facilitate the existing
and for the expected traffic load in the future, because the town is developing.
From this road we have given a stretch of 3 km emanating from station 12+500 to 15+500 for
this project to do geometric and pavement design in general.

1.2

Objectives

This final year design project on high-way has the following major objectives: To expose the prospective graduates to a detail and organized design on road projects;
To implement the knowledge that the prospective graduates have learned theoretically in
classes;
To ensure a good carrier development;

1.3

Brief Description of The Project Area

The Hargele - Afder Bare - Yet road project, is located in the Eastern part of the country in
Somali National Regional State, Afder Administrative Zone, Afder and Bare Woredas. The
project starts at Hargele (513N and 42 11E) and pass through Hargele, Afder, Bare, town and
ends at Yet. The project length is estimated to be 142.4km. The Location map together with the
topographic map of the project area is shown below.

Fig. 1.1 Project Location Map

2
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Location of the Project


Road

Fig. 1.3.3

Digitized Proposed Project Alternative Alignments

3
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Climate:
One of the environmental factors that affect performance of pavements structures is climate.
Hence, climate data of the project area mainly rainfall intensity, in terms of mean monthly and
mean annual and, temperature are required. According to the map shown on National Atlas of
Ethiopian Atlas, the project area is located in the region of the lowest annual rainfall. The mean
annual rainfall in this region is 300mm per year. The rainfall of the project area is characterized
by the following rainfall distribution:
April, May and October

The wettest Months

And in the remaining months

The driest months.

Topography:
The terrain of the project area through which the road alignment traverses is rolling in substantial
section of the project which is intercepted by mountainous terrain in some sections.
Potential of the area:
In the project area limited crop production, livestock and livestock products are available in the
area of influence of the road project even though the area is under attention to reverse food
deficit. There is an initiative to change the area that the potential resources of oil mining and salt
production may attract private investors and governmental agencies.

1.4 Scope of the project


The scope of the project goes as far as designing the geometry and pavement of a given road
section, with its appropriate drainage structures.

Section-2:

Geometric design

2.1 Geometric design Control and Criteria


4
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

2.1.1 Terrain classification


2.1.1.1 Contour generation
The surveying data x, Y and Z coordinate taken from the road corridor using Hand Held GPS are
converted to a contour using GIS software.
2.1.1.2 Selection of center line
The center line of the road is delineated on the given road corridor using the contour elevations
by considering to have minimum earth work along the corridor.
2.1.1.3 Transverse terrain property
In order to know the type of the terrain along the selected center line or corridor, we took
horizontal distance perpendicular to the center line and vertical elevation measurements across
the road. Each measurement is taken longitudinally along the rod at 20m interval to get better
terrain classification. The values obtained are summarized in index table 2-1.
Slop= (vertical elevation / horizontal elevation)*100
Therefore, we generalize the following terrains classification along the road corridor:
STATION
From

To

TERRAIN
CLASSIFICATION

AVG. SLOPE
(%)

12+ 500

12+ 760

Rolling

23.14

12 + 760

13+ 080

Mountainous

26.63

13 + 080

13+ 520

Rolling

18.75

13 + 520

13+ 820

Mountainous

32.234

13 + 820

15 +500

Rolling

16.87

Table 2-2 Terrain Classification

5
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Fig 2-1 Generated contour.

2.1.2 Design traffic volume

6
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

2.1.2.1 Traffic data analysis


In order to design the road, traffic data analysis is very important. Therefore, the secondary data
of traffic analysis we get from the project site comprises traffic volume before design, during
implementation and up to the design life time of the road. As the secondary data shows the
project life is 15 year. The traffic volume data and the design life time are expressed in the
following table.
Year

Car

4 WD

S/ Bus

L/ Bus

S/ Truck

M/ Truck

L/ Truck

T&
T

TOTAL

2008

12

14

44

2009

13

16

51

2010

14

16

52

2011

14

17

56

2012

15

18

58

2013

15

16

31

20

28

34

149

2014

16

17

34

21

30

37

160

2015

19

19

36

22

32

39

174

2016

19

21

38

25

35

41

184

2017

19

21

40

26

36

44

193

2018

20

22

43

28

38

46

205

2019

21

25

11

44

31

42

49

221

2020

22

26

11

47

32

44

52

232

2021

22

26

12

49

34

46

53

241

2022

22

29

12

52

35

48

56

253

2023

25

30

13

55

36

51

59

267

2024

25

32

13

57

39

54

60

279

2025

26

33

14

60

40

57

64

292

2026

27

34

14

62

43

60

67

307

2027

28

37

16

66

44

63

70

323

Table 2-3 Traffic data analysis


From the above data,
o Traffic volume when the road open

=149 veh/day

o Traffic volume at the end of the project life =323 veh/day


7
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

2.1.3 Road functional classification


Some of the factors which affect road design control and criteria are functional classification of
the road. In Ethiopian case, we have five functional classes based on AADT and importance of
the road.
Since, AADT of the project lies between 200-1000, and the road expected to serve centers of
provisional importance, the road could be main access road (class II).

2.2 Geometric Design Standard


Based on the traffic data obtained from the above table we decide the project design standard to
be (DS4).
Because:a) Even if the AADT at the opening of the road (2013) is 149 veh/day it will be greater than
200 veh/ day after five year and it is 323 veh/day at the end of design life (15 years). So it
fulfills the requirements of DS4. Since the recommended traffic volume for DS4 is 2001000 veh/day.(ERA)
b) The second reason is that since the area is an oil mining area, we expect the road will
accommodate the expected traffic volume during the design life time.
c) Based on the above reason, we decide the road to be DS4, to get full knowledge from the
whole project since the project is for academic purpose.
Therefore, we took the entire design element based on DS4. Refer the above information from
ERA manual Table 2.1.
From Design Standards vs. Road Classification and AADT table of ERA for DS4,
AADT=200 1000 vehicle/day
Surface type = paved
Carriageway = 6.7m
Shoulder width =1.5m for rolling
= 0.5m for mountainous
8
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Design speed = 70km/hr for rolling


= 60km/hr =for mountainous

2.2.1 Horizontal Alignment


Based on our proposal of the center line of the road, we have tangents and curves. The curves are
curve1, curve2, curve3, curve4, curve5, and curve6.
Based on our terrain classification, the curves fall in to different terrain classification that leads
us to determine the radius and different elements of each curve.
Curve

Terrain type

Curve 1

Rolling

Curve 2

Rolling

Curve 3

Rolling

Curve 4

Error! Not a
valid link.

Curve 5

Rolling

Curve 6

Rolling

Table 2-4 Horizontal curves and their terrain classification


Since our road is DS4, the minimum radius of each curve based on the terrain is:Minimum horizontal radius = 175m for rolling
= 125m for mountainous
Refer the following table for the rest of the design elements of DS4 (ERA standards)
Design Element

Unit

Flat Rolling Mountainous Escarpment

Urban/Peri- Urban

Design Speed

km/h

85

70

60

50

50

Min. Stopping Sight Distance

155

110

85

55

55

Min. Passing Sight Distance

340

275

225

175

175

% Passing Opportunity

25

25

15

20

Min. Horizontal Curve Radius

270

175

125

85

85
9

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Transition Curves Required

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

Max. Gradient (desirable)

Max. Gradient (absolute)

Minimum Gradient

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

Maximum Super elevation

Crest Vertical Curve

60

31

18

10

10

Sag Vertical Curve

36

25

18

12

12

Normal Cross fall

2.5

2.5

2.5

2.5

2.5

Shoulder Cross fall

Right of Way

50

50

50

50

50

Table 2-5: Table 2-6 of ERA Geometric Design Parameters for Design Standard DS4 (Paved)

2.2.1.1 Horizontal curve elements


Curve-1 Design computation
a) Terrain type = Rolling
b) Deflection angle = 390 (by measurement)
c) Point of intersection P.I=12+717.4m
d) Calculation of radius of the curve
Rmin

Vd 2
127(e f )

Where, Rmin=minimum radius


Vd=70km/hr.ERA, table 2.6
ed= 8% (max design super elevation rate, ERA, table 2.6)
f=0.14 (ERA. Table 8.1 for ed=8%)
Then, Rmin

70 2
175.3m
127(0.08 0.14)

10
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

The calculated Rmin has no significant change from the recommended in ERA manual standard
(i.e., 175m), in addition to this, in order to minimize cut and fill, we use R min=175m from the
standard.
Therefore, radius of curve=Rc=175m
e) Tangent (T1)

T1 R * tan

39
61.97 m
2

T1 175 * tan

f) Point of curvature (PC)


P.C1= P.I1 - T1
=12+717.4 0+061.97
=12+655.43m
g) Length of the curve (L)
2

360

L1 * R *

2
119 .12m
360

L1 390 *175 *

h) Point of tangency (P.T)


P.T1= P.C1+L1
=12+655.43+119.12
=12+774.55m
i) External distance (E)

11
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010


E1 R * sec 1
2

39
E1 175 * sec
1 10.65m
2

j) Middle ordinate (M)


M 1 R * 1 cos
2

39
M 1 175 * 1 cos
10.04m
2

k) Chord (Chord from P.C to P.T)


C1 2 R sin

39
116 .83m
2

C1 2 *175 * sin

Fig.2.2 elements 0f curve-1


12
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Curve-2 Design computation


a) Terrain type = Rolling
b) Deflection angle = 330 (by measurement)
c) Point of intersection P.I=13+150.43m
d) Calculation of radius of the curve
Rmin

Vd 2
127(e f )

Where, Rmin=minimum radius


Vd=70km/hr.ERA, table 2.6
ed= 8% (max design super elevation rate, ERA, table 2.6)
f=0.14 (ERA. Table 8.1 for ed=8%)
Then, Rmin

70 2
175.3m
127(0.08 0.14)

The calculated Rmin has no significant change from the recommended in ERA manual standard
(i.e., 175m), in addition to this to prevent overlaps with curve 3, we use Rmin=175m from the
standard.
Therefore, radius of curve=Rc=175m
e) Tangent (T1)
Rmin = 175m

T2 R * tan

33
51.84m
2

T2 175 * tan

f) Point of curvature (PC)


13
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

P.C2= P.I2 T2
=13+150.43 0+051.84
=13+098.59m
g) Length of the curve (L)
2

360

L2 * R *

2
100.79m
360

L2 330 *175 *

h) Point of tangency (P.T)


P.T2= P.C2+L2
=13+98.59+100.79
=13+199.38m
i) External distance (E)


E2 R * sec 1
2

33
E2 175 * sec
1 7.52m
2

j) Middle ordinate (M)


M 2 R * 1 cos
2

33
M 2 175 * 1 cos
7.21m
2

k) Chord (Chord from P.C to P.T)

14
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

C2 2 R sin

33
99.41m
2

C2 2 *175 * sin

Fig 2.3 elements of curve-2


Curve-3 Design computation
a) Terrain type = Rolling
b) Deflection angle = 59.620 (by measurement)
c) Point of intersection P.I=13+363.64m
d) Calculation of radius of the curve
Rmin

Vd 2
127(e f )

Where, Rmin=minimum radius


Vd=70km/hr.ERA, table 2.6
ed= 8% (max design super elevation rate, ERA, table 2.6)
f=0.14 (ERA. Table 8.1 for ed=8%)
15
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

Then, Rmin

2010

70 2
175.3m
127(0.08 0.14)

The calculated Rmin has no significant change from the recommended in ERA manual standard
(i.e., 175m), in addition to this to prevent overlaps with curve 2, we use R min=175m from the
standard.
Therefore, radius of curve=Rc=175m

e) Tangent (T3)
Rmin = 175m

T3 R * tan

59.62
100.26m
2

T3 175 * tan

f) Point of curvature (PC)


P.C3= P.I3 - T3
=13+363.64 0+100.26
=13+263.38m
g) Length of the curve (L)
2

360

L3 * R *

2
182m
360

L3 59.620 *175 *

h) Point of tangency (P.T)

16
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

P.T3= P.C3+L3
=13+263.38+182m
=13+445.38m

i) External distance (E)


E3 R * sec 1
2

59.62
E3 175 * sec
1 26.69m
2

j) Middle ordinate (M)


M 3 R * 1 cos
2

59.62
M 3 175 * 1 cos
23.17 m
2

k) Chord (Chord from P.C to P.T)


C3 2 R sin

59.62
173.99m
2

C3 2 *175 * sin

Curve-4 Design computation


a) Terrain type = Rolling
b) Deflection angle = 90.810 (by measurement)
c) Point of intersection P.I=14+045.5m
d) Calculation of radius of the curve
17
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

Rmin

2010

Vd 2
127(e f )

Where, Rmin=minimum radius


Vd=70km/hr.ERA, table 2.6
ed= 8% (max design super elevation rate, ERA, table 2.6)
f=0.14 (ERA. Table 8.1 for ed=8%)
Then, Rmin

70 2
175.37 m
127(0.08 0.14)

The calculated Rmin has no significant change from the recommended in ERA manual standard
(i.e., 175m), so we use Rmin=175m from the standard.
But to make the curve smooth, we took R=236m, I.e. =RC=236m
e) Tangent (T4)
R = 236m

T4 R * tan

90.81
239m
2

T4 236 * tan

f) Point of curvature (PC)


P.C4= P.I4 T4
=14+045.5 0+239
=13+806.5m
g) Length of the curve (L)
2

360

L4 * R *

18
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

2
374.m
360

L4 90.810 * 236 *

h) Point of tangency (P.T)


P.T4= P.C4+L4
=13+806.5+374m
=14+180.5m

i) External distance (E)


E4 R * sec 1
2

90.81
E4 236 * sec
1 100.12m
2

j) Middle ordinate (M)


M 4 R * 1 cos
2

90.810
M 4 236 * 1 cos
2

70.31m

k) Chord (Chord from P.C to P.T)


C4 2 R sin

90.810
2

C 4 2 * 236 * sin

336.10m

Curve-5 Design computation


a) Terrain type = Rolling
19
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

b) Deflection angle = 44.150 (by measurement)


c) Point of intersection P.I=14+756.69m
d) Calculation of radius of the curve
Rmin

Vd 2
127(e f )

Where, Rmin=minimum radius


Vd=70km/hr.ERA, table 2.6
ed= 8% (max design super elevation rate, ERA, table 2.6)
f=0.14 (ERA. Table 8.1 for ed=8%)
Then, Rmin

70 2
175.4m
127(0.08 0.14)

The calculated Rmin has no significant change from the recommended in ERA manual standard
(i.e., 175m), in addition to this, in order to minimize cut and fill, we use R min=175m from the
standard.
Therefore, radius of curve=Rc=175m
e) Tangent (T5)
Rmin = 175m

T5 R * tan

44.15
70.97 m
2

T5 175 * tan

f) Point of curvature (PC)


P.C5= P.I5 T5
=14+756.69 0+70.97m
20
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

=14+685.72m
g) Length of the curve (L)
2

360

L5 * R *

2
134.85m
360

L5 44.150 *175 *

h) Point of tangency (P.T)


P.T5= P.C5+L5
=14+685.72+134.85m
=14+820.57m
i) External distance (E)


E5 R * sec 1
2

44.150
E5 175 * sec
2

1 13.84m

j) Middle ordinate (M)


M 5 R * 1 cos
2

44.15
M 5 175 * 1 cos
12.83m
2

k) Chord (Chord from P.C to P.T)


C5 2 R sin

21
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

44.150
2

C5 2 *175 * sin

131.54m

Curve-6 Design computation


a) Terrain type = Rolling
b) Deflection angle = 32.480 (by measurement)
c) Point of intersection P.I=15+226.73m
d) Calculation of radius of the curve
Rmin

Vd 2
127(e f )

Where, Rmin=minimum radius


Vd=70km/hr.ERA, table 2.6
ed= 8% (max design super elevation rate, ERA, table 2.6)
f=0.14 (ERA. Table 8.1 for ed=8%)
Then, Rmin

70 2
175.4m
127(0.08 0.14)

The calculated Rmin has no significant change from the recommended in ERA manual standard
(i.e., 175m), in addition to this, in order to minimize cut and fill, we use R min=175m from the
standard.
Therefore, radius of curve=Rc=175m
e) Tangent (T6)
Rmin = 175m

T6 R * tan

22
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

32.48
50.97 m
2

T6 175 * tan

f) Point of curvature (PC)


P.C6= P.I6 T6
=15+226.73m 0+050.97
=15+175.76m
g) Length of the curve (L)
2

360

L6 * R *

2
99.20m
360

L6 32.48 0 *175 *

h) Point of tangency (P.T)


P.T6= P.C6+L6
=15+175.76m +99.20m
=15+274.96m
i) External distance (E)


E6 R * sec 1
2

32.480
1 7.27 m
E6 175 * sec
2

j) Middle ordinate (M)


M 6 R * 1 cos
2

23
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

32.480
6.98m
M 6 175 * 1 cos
2

k) Chord (Chord from P.C to P.T)


C6 2 R sin

32.480
2

C 6 2 *175 * sin

97.88m

2.2.1.2 Transition curve


When a vehicle traveling on a straight course enters a curve of finite radius, and suddenly
subjected to the centrifugal force which shock and sway. In order to avoid this it is customary to
provide a transition curve at the beginning of the circular curve having a radius equal to infinity
at the end of the straight and gradually reducing the radius to the radius of the circular curve
where the curve begins.
Mostly transition curves are introduced between:A/ between tangents and curves
B/ between two curves
Various forms of transition curves are suitable for high way transition, but the one most popular
and recommended for use is spiral.

Design of transition curve


Even if there are places to design transition curve, ERA design manual standard recommends
where and how to design this horizontal alignment design elements. Especially for Ethiopian
road, transition curves are a requirement for trunk and link road segments having a speed equal
to or greater than 80km/hr. (ERA)
But the characteristics of our project road segment is;Speed=60km/hr (for mountainous terrain)
24
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Speed=70km/hr (for rolling terrain)


Terrain= mostly rolling and mountainous
Functional classification=Main access road.
Therefore, based on the ERA standard all curves in the project will not have transition curve. So,
it will be a simple curve with out transition curve.

2.2.1.3 Super elevation


Curve-1
When a vehicles moves in a circular path, it is forced radially by centrifugal force. The
centrifugal force is counter balanced by super elevation of the road way and/or the side friction
developed between the tire and the road surface. The centrifugal force is the result of design
speed, weight of car, friction, and gravitational acceleration having the following relation ship.
Fc

Wv 2
gR

Where, Fc= centrifugal force


W=weight of the car
V=design speed
g= acceleration due to gravity
R= radius of the curve
So, super elevation rate is changing the road cross section from the normal road to elevate
towards the center of the curve. I.e., it counteracts a part of the centrifugal force, the remaining
part being resisted by the lateral friction.
Terms in super elevation:
Tangent run out(Lt)
Super elevation runoff(Lr)
25
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Tangent run out (Lt)


It is the longitudinal length along the road designed to remove the adverse crown to a zero slope.
i.e., the outer edge of the road is raised from a normal cross slope to a zero slope which equal to
the grade level of the road (the level of the center line of the road).

Super elevation runoff length (Lr)


Super elevation run-off is a length of the road section from the point of removal of adverse
crown of the road to the full super elevated point on the curve.
Super elevation is equal to the length of transition curve when there is a transition curve. When
there is no transition curve i.e., when it is a simple curve,1/3 rd of the length is placed on the curve
and 2/3rd of the length is placed on the tangent part(ERA). Therefore, we follow the second
standard to design our super elevation since all the curves do not have transition curve.

Design computation
A/ computation of super elevation run-off
Super elevation runoff length can be obtained from table 8.5 (ERA) using radius (Rc) and super
elevation rate (e), or it can be computed from the following formula. (AASHTO)

Lr

wn1 ed b
w
G

Where,
Lr=minimum super elevation run-off (m)
G=maximum relative gradient (percent)
n1=number of lanes rotated
Bw=adjustment factor for number of lane rotated
w=width of one traffic lane (in our case, w/2)
ed=design super elevation rate, percent
26
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Then, n1=1, since the number of lane rotated is =1(AASHTO, exhibit 3-31)
bw=1, for one lane rotated(AASHTO, exhibit 3-31)
G=0.55%, for Vd=70km/hr (AASHTO, exhibit 3-31)
Design speed(Km/h)(Vd)

Maximum relative
gradient(%)(G)

Equivalent maximum relative


slope (%)

20

0.80

1:125

30

0.75

1:133

40

0.70

1:143

50

0.65

1:150

60

0.60

1:167

70

0.55

1:182

80

0.50

1:200

90

0.45

1:213

100

0.40

1:227

110

0.35

1:244

120

0.30

1:263

130

0.25

1:286

Table2-6 (Exhibit 3-27 Maximum relative gradients of AASHTO)

Therefore,

6.7
*1 * 0.08

1 48.87 m
Lr
0.55

But ERA recommends Lr=52m for ed=8% and Rc=175m. Thus, take Lr=52m
B/ computation of tangent run out (Lt)
Tangent run-out can be computed using the following equation. (AASHTO)
Lt

eNC
* Lr
ed

Where,
27
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Lt =minimum length of tangent run-out


eNC=normal cross slope rate, percent
ed =design super elevation, percent
Lr=super elevation runoff length
Then,

Lt

0.025
* 52 16.25m
0.08

C/ Location of super elevation run-off (Lr)


Since there is no transition curve (spiral) between the tangent and the curve in the project, 2/3 rd
of the super elevation length is placed on the tangent and 1/3rd of the length is placed on the
curve part.
i.e.,

1
* 52 17.33m (on the curve)
3
2
* 52 34.67 m (On the tangent)
3

Then,
The beginning of the super elevation runoff length is:=P.C-34.67m
=12+655.43-0+034.67
=12+620.76m

The end of the super elevation runoff length is:=P.C+17.33m


=12+655.43+0+017.33m
=12+672.76m
28
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

D/ location of tangent run-out length


Beginning=beginning of Lr minus Lt
=12+620.76-16.25m
=12+604.51m
End=12+620.76m
E/ station where outer and inner edge of the road will have the same normal cross fall i.e., 2.5%
It is a length(R) where total crown removal is attained.
So, R=2*Lt
=2*16.25
=32.50m,
Then, the station is,
Beginning= station of beginning of adverse crown removal
=12+604.51m
End=station of beginning of adverse crown removal plus +R
=12+604.51+32.50m
=12+637.01m
On the same process we can do the super elevation at the exit of the curve.
We know that the length of curve 1=119.12m
Then the part of the curve to be full super elevated is
=119.12-2*(1/3*Lr)
=119.12-2*(1/3*52)
=84.46m
29
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

F/ Then, the station of end of full super elevation is


=12+672.76+84.46m
=12+757.22m
G/ station of end of super elevation runoff is
=12+757.22+52m
=12+809.22m
H/ station of recovering adverse crown is
=12+809.22+16.25m
=12+825.47

Attainment of full super elevation:From three methods attaining full super elevation we use the method in which rotating the
surface of the road about the center line of the carriageway, gradually lowering the inner edge
and raising the upper edge, keeping the center line constant.

Illustration:

30
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Fig.2-4 Attainment of super elevation


Based on the above super elevation attainment, the results are shown on the following figure.

31
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Fig.2-5 Super elevation at entrance and exit for curve 1

Curve-2 Design computation


A/ computation of super elevation run-off

Lr

wn1 ed b
w
G

n1=1, since the number of lane rotated is =1(AASHTO, exhibit 3-31)


bw=1, for one lane rotated(AASHTO, exhibit 3-31)
G=0.55%, (AASHTO, exhibit 3-31)

Therefore,

6.7
*1 * 0.08

Lr
* 1 48.78m
0.55

But ERA recommends Lr=52m for ed=8% and Rc=175m. Thus, take Lr=52m
B/ computation of tangent run out (Lt)

32
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Tangent run-out can be computed using the following equation. (AASHTO)


Lt

eNC
* Lr
ed

Then,

Lt

0.025
* 52 16.25m
0.08

C/ Location of super elevation run-off (Lr)


Since there is no transition curve (spiral) between the tangent and the curve in the project, 2/3 rd
of the super elevation length is placed on the tangent and 1/3rd of the length is placed on the
curve part.
i.e.,

1
* 52 17.33m (on the curve)
3
2
* 52 34.67 m (On the tangent)
3

Then,
The beginning of the super elevation runoff length is:=P.C-34.67m
=13+98.59-0+034.67
=13+63.92m

The end of the super elevation runoff length is:=P.C+17.33m


=13+98.59+0+017.33m
=13+115.92m
D/ location of tangent run-out length
33
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Beginning=beginning of Lr minus Lt
=13+63.92 -16.25m
=13+47.67m
End=13+63.92m
E/ station where outer and inner edge of the road will have the same normal cross fall i.e., 2.5%
It is a length(R) where total crown removal is attained.
So, R=2*Lt
=2*16.25
=32.50m,
Then, the station is
Beginning= station of beginning of adverse crown removal
=13+047.67m
End=station of beginning of adverse crown removal plus +R
=13+47.67m +32.50m
=13+080.17m
On the same process we can do the super elevation at the exit of the curve.
We know that the length of curve-2=100.79m
Then the part of the curve to be full super elevated is
=100.79-2*(1/3*Lr)
=100.79-2*(1/3*52)
=66.12m
F/ Then, the station of end of full super elevation is
34
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

=end of Lr+L
=13+115.92 +66.12m
=13+182.04m
G/ station of end of super elevation runoff is
=13+182.04 +52m
=13+234.04m
H/ station of recovering adverse crown are:
=13+234.04+16.25m
=13+250.29m

Curve-3 Design computation


A/ computation of super elevation run-off
Super elevation runoff length can be obtained from table 8.5 (ERA) using radius (Rc) and super
elevation rate (e), or it can be computed from the following formula. (AASHTO)

Lr

wn1 ed b
w
G

Then, n1=1, since the number of lane rotated is =1(AASHTO, exhibit 3-31)
bw=1, for one lane rotated(AASHTO, exhibit 3-31)
G=0.55%, (AASHTO, exhibit 3-31)
6.7
*1 * 0.08

Therefore,
2

Lr
* 1 48.78m
0.55

But ERA recommends Lr=52m for ed=8% and Rc=175m. Thus, take Lr=52m
B/ computation of tangent run out (Lt)
35
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Tangent run-out can be computed using the following equation. (AASHTO)


Lt

eNC
* Lr
ed

Lt

0.025
* 52 16.25m
0.08

C/ Location of super elevation run-off (Lr)


Since there is no transition curve (spiral) between the tangent and the curve in the project, 2/3 rd
of the super elevation length is placed on the tangent and 1/3rd of the length is placed on the
curve part.
i.e.,

1
* 52 17.33m (on the curve)
3
2
* 52 34.67 m (On the tangent)
3

Then,
The beginning of the super elevation runoff length is:=P.C-34.67m
=13+263.38 -0+034.67 m
=13+228.71m
The end of the super elevation runoff length is:=P.C+17.33m
=13+263.38 +0+017.33m
=13+280.71m
D/ location of tangent run-out length
Beginning=beginning of Lr minus Lt
36
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

=13+228.71-16.25m
=13+212.46m
End=13+228.71m
E/ station where outer and inner edge of the road will have the same normal cross fall i.e., 2.5%
It is a length(R) where total crown removal is attained.
So, R=2*Lt
=2*16.25
=32.50m,
Then, the station is
Beginning= station of beginning of adverse crown removal
=13+212.46m
End=station of beginning of adverse crown removal plus +R
=13+212.46+32.50m
=13+244.96m
On the same process we can do the super elevation at the exit of the curve.
We know that the length of curve 3=182m
Then the part of the curve to be full super elevated is
=182-2*(1/3*Lr)
=182-2*(1/3*52)
=147.33m
F/ Then, the station of end of full super elevation is
=13+280.71m +147.33m
37
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

=13+428.04m
G/ station of end of super elevation runoff is:
=13+428.04 +52m
=13+480.04m
H/ station of recovering adverse crown is:
=13+480.04+16.25m
=13+496.29m

Curve-4 Design computation


A/ computation of super elevation run-off
Super elevation runoff length can be obtained from table 8.5 (ERA) using radius (Rc) and super
elevation rate (e), or it can be computed from the following formula. (AASHTO)

Lr

wn1 ed b
w
G

Then, n1=1, since the number of lane rotated is =1(AASHTO, exhibit 3-31)
bw=1, for one lane rotated(AASHTO, exhibit 3-31)
G=.55%, for Vd=70km/hr, (AASHTO, exhibit 3-31)

Therefore,

6.7
*1 * 0.08

Lr
* 1 48.7m
0.55

But from ERA for ed=8% and v=70m/sec, by interpolation Lr=49.12m for Rc=236m. Thus, take
Lr=49.12m
B/ computation of tangent run out (Lt)
Tangent run-out can be computed using the following equation. (AASHTO)

38
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

Lt

eNC
* Lr
ed

Lt

0.025
* 49.12 15.35m
0.08

2010

C/ Location of super elevation run-off (Lr)


Since there is no transition curve (spiral) between the tangent and the curve in the project, 2/3 rd
of the super elevation length is placed on the tangent and 1/3rd of the length is placed on the
curve part.
i.e.,

1
* 49.12 16.37 m (on the curve)
3
2
* 49.12 32.75m (On the tangent)
3

Then,
The beginning of the super elevation runoff length is:=P.C-32.75m
=13+806.5-0+032.75
=13+773.75m
The end of the super elevation runoff length is:=P.C+16.37
=13+806.5+0+016.37m
=13+822.87m
D/ location of tangent run-out length
Beginning=beginning of Lr minus Lt
39
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

=13+773.75 -15.35m
=13+758.4m
End=13+839.25m
E/ station where outer and inner edge of the road will have the same normal cross fall i.e., 2.5%
It is a length(R) where total crown removal is attained.
So, R=2*Lt
=2*15.35
=30.7m

Then, the station is


Beginning= station of beginning of adverse crown removal
=13+823.39m
End=station of beginning of adverse crown removal plus +R
=13+823.39m +30.70m
=13+854.10m
On the same process we can do the super elevation at the exit of the curve.
We know that the length of curve 4=374m
Then the part of the curve to be full super elevated is
=374-2*(1/3*Lr)
=374-2*(1/3*49.12)
=341.25m
F/ Then, the station of end of full super elevation is
40
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

=13+822.87+341.25m m
=14+164.12m
G/ station of end of super elevation runoff is:
=14+164.12m +49.12m
=14+213.24m
H/ station of recovering adverse crown is:
=14+213.24 +15.35m
=14+228.59m

Curve-5 Design computation


A/ computation of super elevation run-off
Super elevation runoff length can be obtained from table 8.5 (ERA) using radius (Rc) and super
elevation rate (e), or it can be computed from the following formula. (AASHTO)

Lr

wn1 ed b
w
G

Then, n1=1, since the number of lane rotated is =1(AASHTO, exhibit 3-31)
bw=1, for one lane rotated(AASHTO, exhibit 3-31)
G=.55%, for Vd=70km/hr, (AASHTO, exhibit 3-31)

Therefore,

6.7
*1 * 0.08

Lr
* 1 48.78m
0.55

But ERA recommends Lr=48m for ed=8% and Rc=175m. Thus, take Lr=52m
B/ computation of tangent run out (Lt)
Tangent run-out can be computed using the following equation. (AASHTO)
41
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

Lt

eNC
* Lr
ed

Lt

0.025
* 52 16.25m
0.08

2010

C/ Location of super elevation run-off (Lr)


Since there is no transition curve (spiral) between the tangent and the curve in the project, 2/3 rd
of the super elevation length is placed on the tangent and 1/3rd of the length is placed on the
curve part.
i.e.,

1
* 52 17.33m (on the curve)
3
2
* 52 34.67 m (On the tangent)
3

Then,
The beginning of the super elevation runoff length is:=P.C-34.67m
=14+685.72m -0+034.67m
=14+651.05m
The end of the super elevation runoff length is:=P.C+17.33m
=14+685.72+0+017.33m
=14+703.05m
D/ location of tangent run-out length
Beginning=beginning of Lr minus Lt
42
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

=14+651.05-16.25m
=14+634.80m
End=14+651.05m
E/ Station where outer and inner edge of the road will have the same normal cross fall i.e., 2.5%
It is a length(R) where total crown removal is attained.
So, R=2*Lt
=2*16.25
=32.50m,
Then, the station is;
Beginning=station of beginning of adverse crown removal
=14+634.80m
End=station of beginning of adverse crown removal plus +R
=14+634.80m +32.50m
=14+667.30m
On the same process we can do the super elevation at the exit of the curve.
We know that the length of curve 5=134.35m
Then the part of the curve to be full super elevated is
=134.35-2*(1/3*Lr)
=134.35-2*(1/3*52)
=99.68m
F/ Then, the station of end of full super elevation is
=14+703.05m +99.68m
43
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

=14+802.73m
G/ station of end of super elevation runoff are:
=14+802.73m +52m
=14+854.73m
H/ station of recovering adverse crown is:
=14+854.73m +16.25m
=14+870.98m

Curve-6 Design computation


A/ computation of super elevation run-off:
Super elevation runoff length can be obtained from table 8.5 (ERA) using radius (Rc) and super
elevation rate (e), or it can be computed from the following formula. (AASHTO)

Lr

wn1 ed b
w
G

Then, n1=1, since the number of lane rotated is =1(AASHTO, exhibit 3-31)
bw=1, for one lane rotated(AASHTO, exhibit 3-31)
G=.55%, for Vd=60km/hr, (AASHTO, exhibit 3-31)
6.7
*1 * 0.08

Therefore,
2

Lr
* 1 48.78m
0.55

But ERA recommends Lr=48m for ed=8% and Rc=175m. Thus, take Lr=52m
44
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

B/ computation of tangent run out (Lt)


Tangent run-out can be computed using the following equation. (AASHTO)
Lt

eNC
* Lr
ed

Lt

0.025
* 52 16.25m
0.08

C/ Location of super elevation run-off (Lr)


Since there is no transition curve (spiral) between the tangent and the curve in the project, 2/3 rd
of the super elevation length is placed on the tangent and 1/3rd of the length is placed on the
curve part.
i.e.,

1
* 52 17.33m (on the curve)
3
2
* 52 34.67 m (On the tangent)
3

Then,
The beginning of the super elevation runoff length is:=P.C-34.67m
=15+175.76m -0+034.67m
=15+141.10m
The end of the super elevation runoff length is:=P.C+17.33m
=15+175.76m +0+017.33m
=15+193.10m
45
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

D/ location of tangent run-out length


Beginning=beginning of Lr minus Lt
=15+141.10m -16.25m
=15+123.85m
End=15+123.85m
E/ station where outer and inner edge of the road will have the same normal cross fall i.e., 2.5%
It is a length(R) where total crown removal is attained.
So, R=2*Lt
=2*16.25
=32.50m,
Then, the station is
Beginning= station of beginning of adverse crown removal
=15+123.85m
End=station of beginning of adverse crown removal plus + R
=15+123.85m +32.50m
=15+156.35m
On the same process we can do the super elevation at the exit of the curve.
We know that the length of curve 6=99.20m
Then the part of the curve to be full super elevated is
=99.20-2*(1/3*Lr)
=99.20-2*(1/3*52)
=64.53m
46
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

F/ Then, the station of end of full super elevation is


=15+193.10+64.53m
=15+257.63m
G/ station of end of super elevation runoff is:
=15+257.63m +52m
=15+309.63m
H/ station of recovering adverse crown is:
=15+309.63m +16.25m
=15+325.88m

Super elevation overlaps:


The end of tangent run out (super elevation runoff length) for curve 2 and the beginning of
tangent run out (super elevation runoff length) of curve 3 overlaps with an amount of:
Over lap= (13+250.29)-(13+212.46)
=42.83m
Therefore, this overlap length has to distribute on the curve part of each curve according to the
following.
Half of the overlap distance has to be added to the part of the curve. I.e. if the overlap length is d,
the part of super elevation on the curve will be
=1/3rd (Lr) +d/2
=17.33+42.83/2m
=38.475m
But this length has to be 40% of length of the corresponding curve.

47
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Check:
Lc of curve 2=100.79m
Then, 40%*100.79=40.32>38.745m.OK!
Lc of curve 3=182m,
Then, 0.4*182=72.8>38.475mOK!
Re-adjustment for super elevation stations.

Curve-2
1. The beginning of the super elevation runoff length is:=P.C-(34.67-21.415) m
=13+98.59-(0+013.25)
=13+085.34m
2. The end of the super elevation runoff length is:=P.C+17.33m
=13+98.59+ (0+017.33+21.415) m
=13+137.34m
3. Location of tangent run-out length
Beginning=beginning of Lr minus Lt
=13+085.34m -16.25m
=13+069.09m
End=13+085.34m
4. Station where outer and inner edge of the road will have the same normal cross fall i.e., 2.5%
It is a length(R) where total crown removal is attained.
48
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

So, R=2*Lt
=2*16.25
=32.50m,
Then, the station is
Beginning= station of beginning of adverse crown removal
=13+069.09m
End=station of beginning of adverse crown removal plus +R
=13+069.09m +32.50m
=13+101.59m
On the same process we can do the super elevation at the exit of the curve.
We know that the length of curve-2=100.79m
Then the part of the curve to be full super elevated is
=100.79-2*(1/3*Lr+21.415)
=100.79-2*(1/3*52+21.415)
=23.29m
5. Then, the station of end of full super elevation is
=end of Lr+23.29
=13+137.34m +23.29m
=13+160.63m
6. Station of end of super elevation runoff is
=13+160.63+52m
=13+212.63m
49
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

7. Station of recovering adverse crown is:


=13+212.63m +16.25m
=13+228.88m
Curve-3
1. The beginning of the super elevation runoff length is:=P.C-(34.67-21.415) m
=13+263.38 (0+013.25) m
=13+250.13m
2. The end of the super elevation runoff length is:=P.C+ (17.33+21.415) m
=13+263.38 + (0+38.75) m
=13+302.13m
3. Location of tangent run-out length
Beginning=beginning of Lr minus Lt
=13+250.13m -16.25m
=13+233.88m
End=13+250.13m
4. Station where outer and inner edge of the road will have the same normal cross fall i.e., 2.5%
It is a length(R) where total crown removal is attained.
So, R=2*Lt
=2*16.25
=32.50m,
50
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Then, the station is


Beginning= station of beginning of adverse crown removal
=13+250.13m
End=station of beginning of adverse crown removal plus +R
=13+250.13m +32.50m
=13+282.63m
On the same process we can do the super elevation at the exit of the curve.
We know that the length of curve 3=182m
Then the part of the curve to be full super elevated is
=182-2*(1/3*Lr+d/2)
=182-2*((1/3*52) +42.83/2)
=104.50m
5. Then, the station of end of full super elevation is
=13+302.13m +104.50
=13+406.63m
6. Station of end of super elevation runoff is:
=13+406.63m + 52m
=13+458.63m
7/ station of recovering adverse crown is:
=13+458.63m +16.25m
=13+474.88m

51
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Fig 2-6 profile, section and station of super elevation, tangent run out for all curves

52
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

STATIONS
CURVE NUMBER

Curve 1

12+604.51

12+620.76

12+637.01

12+672.76

12+757.22

12+792.97

12+809.22

12+825.47

Curve 2

13+069.09

13+085.34

13+101.59

13+137.34

13+160.63

13+196.38

13+212.63

13+228.88

Curve 3

13+233.88

13+250.13

13+282.63

13+302.13

13+406.63

13+442.38

13+458.63

13+474.88

Curve 4

13+756.4

13+773.75

13+789.10

13+822.87

14+164.12

14+197.89

14+213.24

14+228.59

14+634.80

14+651.05

14+667.30

14+703.05

14+802.73

14+838.48

14+854.73

14+870.98

15+123.85

15+141.10

15+156.35

15+193.10

15+257.63

15+293.38

15+309.63

15+325.88

Curve 5
Curve 6

Table 2-7 stations of super elevation, tangent run out for all curves.

53
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

2.2.1.4 Curve widening


Widening on a curve is giving extra width on a road curves. This is because:

It has been found that the drivers on curves have difficulty in steering their
vehicles to outer edge of road as they are able to on the straight because the rear
wheels do not follow precisely the same path as the front wheels when the
vehicles negotiates a horizontal curve or makes a turn.

Also there is psychological tendency to drive at greater clearance, when passing


vehicle on curved than on straights. Hence, there is dire necessity for widening
the carriage way on curves.

On curves the vehicles occupy a greater width because the rear wheels track
inside the front wheels.

Analysis of extra widening on horizontal curves


When vehicles negotiate a curve, the rear wheel generally do not follow the same track as
that of the front wheels. It has been observed that except at very high speed, the rear axle
of a motor vehicles remains in line with the radius of the curve. Since the body of the
vehicle is rigid, therefore, the front wheel will twist themselves at one angle to their axle,
such that vertical plane passing through each wheel is perpendicular to the radius of the
curve in order to trace the path on the curve. This is known as off tracking.
To determine width (W) it is necessary to select an appropriate design vehicle. The design
vehicle should usually be a truck because the off tracking is much greater for trucks than
for passenger car. (AASHTO) There fore, widening on horizontal curves depend on:

The length and width of the vehicle

Radius of curvature

54
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Fig 2-7 widening of pavements on horizontal curves


Let;
L= length of wheel base of vehicle in m.
b=width of the road in m,
w=extra width in m,
R1=radius of the outer rear wheel in m,
R2= radius of the outer front wheel in m,
n=number of lanes
Rc= radius of curvature
The formula obtained from the above geometries for extra widening for more than one
lane (mechanical widening) is:mechanical..widening wm

n * L2
2 * Rc

The extra widening needed for psychological reasons mentioned above is assumed as:-

55
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

psycho log icalwidening w p

2010
v
10 Rc

There fore, total widening w will be:w

n * L2
v

2 * Rc 10 Rc

Widening attainment on curves


The following rules apply for attaining widening on both ends of the curve. (AASHTO)
A. widening should be done gradually and has to be realized on the inside edge of unspiraled curve (on simple curve) pavements.
B. In the case of a circular curve with transition curves, widening may be applied on the
inside edge or divide equally on either side of the center line.
C. On highway curves without transition curves widening should preferably be attained
along the length of super elevation runoff. A smooth fitting alignment would result from
attaining widening on-one half to two-third along the tangent and the remaining along the
curve.
D. Widening is not necessary for large radius greater than 250m.
Curve-1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 Design computations
Design data: Rc = 175m, n=2
L= take 6m (for the design vehicle usually a truck, corresponding to AASHTO, Single
unit (SU))
V=70m/sec
w

n * L2
v

2 * Rc 10 Rc

2 * 62
70

0.73m
2 *175 10 175

56
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

For all curves having a radius between 120 to 250m ERA recommends a minimum of
widening width equal to 0.6m. But we recommend the calculated value 0.73m. So, all the
curves will have the corresponding value unless they are no less than the recommended
value by ERA. Therefore, this widening will be introduced at the inner edge of the
curves. Because all the curves are un spiraled curves.

Fig2-8.widening of pavement on curves

WIDENING
WIDTH(M)

STARTING
STARTING
LAST PT OF END
POINT REMARK
POINT
OF POINT
OF FULL
OF
WIDENING
FULL
WIDENING
WIDENING
WIDENING

0.73

12+620.76

12+672.76

12+757.22

12+809.22

12+620.76

Table 2-8 widening stations for curve 1

Curve-4 Design computation


Design data: Rc=236m, N=2, L= take 6m, V=70m/se
57
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

n * L2
v

2 * Rc 10 Rc

2 * 62
70

0.61m
2 * 236 10 236

CUR
VE
NO.

WIDENI
NG
WIDTH(
M)

2010

STARTING
POINT OF
WIDENING

STARTING
POINT OF
FULL
WIDENING

LAST PT OF
FULL
WIDENING

END POINT
OF
WIDENING

C1

0.73

12+620.76

12+672.76

12+757.22

12+809.22

C2

0.73

13+085.34

13+137.34

13+160.63

13+212.63

C2

0.73

13+250.13

13+302.13

13+406.63

13+458.63

C3

0.73

13+839.25

13+822.87

14+164.12

14+213.24

C4

0.61

14+651.05

14+703.05

14+802.73

14+854.73

C5

0.73

15+141.10

15+193.10

15+257.63

15+309.63

C6

0.73

12+620.76

12+672.76

12+757.22

12+809.22

Table2-9 Widening length and stations for all curves.

2.2.1.4 Site distance


Another element of horizontal alignment is the site distance across the inside of the
curves. Sight distance is the distance visible to the driver of a passenger car or the
roadway ahead that is visible to the driver. For highway safety, the designer must provide
sight distances of sufficient length that drivers can control the operation of their vehicles.
They must be able to avoid striking an unexpected object on the traveled way.
Where there are site obstruction( such as walls, cut slops, buildings and longitudinal
barriers) on the inside of curves or the in side of the median lane on divided highways, a
design may need adjustment in the normal high way cross section or change in the
alignment if removal of the obstruction is impractical to provide adequate site distance.
Because of the many variables in alignment, in cross section and in the number, type and
58
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

location of potential obstructions, specific study is usually need for each individual curve.
With site distance for the design speed as a control, the designer should check the actual
conditions on each curve and make the appropriate adjustment to provide adequate
distance.
Two-lane rural highways should generally provide such passing sight distance at frequent
intervals and for substantial portions of their length.

Stopping site distance


Stopping sight distance is the distance required by a driver of a vehicle traveling at a
given speed to bring his vehicle to a stop after an object on the road way becomes visible.
The minimum stopping sight distance is determined from the following formula, which
takes into account both the driver reaction time and the distance required to stop the
vehicle. The formula is:
d= (0.278) (t) (v) +v2/ 254f
Where:
d = distance (meter)
t = driver reaction time, generally taken to be 2.5 seconds
V = initial speed (km/h)
F = coefficient of friction between tires and roadway (see Table 7-1)
OR the stopping site distance is given in ERA manual in the following table.

Design Speed

Coefficient

Stopping Sight

Passing Sight

(km/h)

of Friction (f)

Distance (m)

Distance (m)

Reduced Passing
Sight
Distance
for design (m)

from formulae
20

0.42

20

160

50

30

0.40

30

217

75
59

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

40

0.38

45

285

125

50

0.35

55

345

175

60

0.33

85

407

225

70

0.31

110

482

275

85

0.30

155

573

340

100

0.29

205

670

375

120

0.28

285

792

425

Table 2-10: Sight Distances


The coefficient of friction values shown in Table 2-10 have been determined from test
using the lowest results of the friction tests. The values shown in the third column of the
above table for minimum stopping sight distance are rounded from the above formula.
For the general use in the design of horizontal curve, the sight line is a chord of the curve,
and the stopping site distance is measured along the center line of the inside lane around
the curve.
The horizontal site line offset needed for clear site areas that satisfy stopping site distance
can be derived from the geometry for the several dimension explained in the following
figure.

60
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Fig 2-9 Site distance for horizontal curves


Relevant formulae are as follows:
Siteline( S ) 2 R sin

Middle..ordinate (d ) R 1 cos
2

Where = Deflection angle


R=radius (from the center line of the inner lane)

Design computation
Using the above formulas the stopping site distance(d), the line of site(S) and middle
ordinate(M) of each horizontal curves can be calculated from the datas of each curve
organized in the following table below.

curve no

deflection
angle(D)

Radius

speed(V)

(R),m

km/hr

driver
reaction
time

Coefficient of
friction(f)

(t) in sec.
Curve 1.

39

173.325

70

2.5

0.31

Curve 2.

33

173.325

70

2.5

0.31

Curve 3.

59.62

173.325

70

2.5

0.31

Curve 4.

90.81

234.325

70

2.5

0.31

Curve 5.

44.15

173.325

70

2.5

0.31

Curve 6.

32.48

173.325

70

2.5

0.31

Table 2-11 different data about each curve


Siteline( S ) 2 R sin

Middle..ordinate (d ) R 1 cos
2

61
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

Stoppingsitedist ..( d ) 0.278vt

Curve

Site line (S)


in m.

2010

v2
254 f

Middle
ordinate (M)
in m.

Stopping site distance(m)


Calculated
distance in m

Recommended by
ERA

curve 1

115.714

9.94

510.55

110

curve 2

98.454

7.14

510.55

110

curve 3

172.329

22.93

510.55

110

curve 4

333.72

69.81

510.55

110

curve 5

130.278

12.76

510.55

110

curve 6

96.945

6.92

510.55

110

Table2-12 Site distance elements

62
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Fig 2-10 stopping site distance of curve 1

Passing site distance


Passing sight distance is the minimum sight distance on two-way single roadway roads
that must be available to enable the driver of one vehicle to pass another vehicle safely
without interfering with the speed of an oncoming vehicle traveling at the design speed.
Within the sight area the terrain should be the same level or a level lower than the
roadway. Otherwise, for horizontal curves, it may be necessary to remove obstructions
and widen cuttings on the insides of curves to obtain the required sight distance. The
passing sight distance is generally determined by a formula with four components, as
follows:
d1 = initial maneuver distance, including a time for perception and reaction
d2 = distance during which passing vehicle is in the opposing lane
d3 = clearance distance between vehicles at the end of the maneuver
d4 = distance traversed by the opposing vehicle
The formulae for these components are as indicated below:
63
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

d1 = 0.278 t1 (v m + at1/2)
Where,
t1 = time of initial maneuver, s
a = average acceleration, km/h/s
v = average speed of passing vehicle, km/h
m = difference in speed of passed vehicle and passing vehicle, km/h
d2 = 0.278 vt2
Where,
t2 = time passing vehicle occupies left lane, sec.
v = average speed of passing vehicle, km/h
d3 = safe clearance distance between vehicles at the end of the maneuver, is dependent on
ambient speeds as per Table 7-2 of ERA standard:
Table 7-2: Clearance Distance (d3) vs. Ambient Speeds
Speed Group (km/h)
Speed group(km/hr)

50-65

D3(m)

30

66-80
55

81-100

101-120

80

100

d4 = distance traversed by the opposing vehicle, which is approximately equal to 2/3 rd of


d2 whereby the passing vehicle is entering the left lane, estimated at:
d4 = 2d2/3
The minimum Passing Sight Distance (PSD) for design is therefore:
PSD = d1+ d2 + d3 + d4

64
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Even if it is calculated using the above formula ERA recommends passing site distance,
so we use the value given by ERA design manual.

Sample calculation
Curve 1
Data:
Design speed=70km/hr=v of passing vehicle
Assume the following values
T1=3.5 sec, T2=3sec, a=1.0m/sec2
V of passing vehicle=70km/hr
V of passed vehicle=65km/hr
i.e., m=70-65=5km/hr
Then,
d1= 0.278 t1 (v m + at1/2)
d1 = 0.278 *3.5* (70 5 + (1*3)/2)
d2= 0.278 vt2= 0.278 *70*3

=64.71m

=58.38m

d3=55m, for design speed group=66km/hr-80km/hr


d4= 2d2/3 = (2*58.38)/3 =38.92m
Therefore, total passing site distance is,
PSD=d1+d2+d3+d4 = Error! Not a valid link.Error! Not a valid link.Error! Not a valid
link.Error! Not a valid link. =218.95m

65
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Fig 2-11 Components of passing maneuver used in passing site distance.

2.2.2 Design of vertical alignment


The two major aspects of vertical alignment are vertical curvature, which is governed by
sight distance criteria, and gradient, which is related to vehicle performance and level of
service. The purpose of vertical alignment design is to determine the elevation of selected
points along the roadway, to ensure proper drainage, safety, and ride comfort. So it is
important to use different series of grades and to create a smooth transition between these
grades parabolic curves are used. The vertical alignment includes:
Joining the grades with smooth curve.
Location of appropriate gradients.

2.2.2.1 Design consideration


2.2.2.1.1 Gradient and grade controls
Changes of grade from plus to minus should be placed in cuts, and changes from a minus
grade to a plus grade should be placed in fills.Highway should be designed to encourage
uniform operation throughout the stretch.In the analysis of grades and grade control, one
of the most important considerations is the effect of grades on the operating of the motor
66
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

vehicle.Determination of grades for vertical alignment the following are taken in to


consideration for;
1. The maximum limit of grades.
Visibility related to sight distance.
Stopping sight distance.
Passing sight distance.
Rider and passenger comfort.
Cost of vehicle operation
General appearance
Cut and fill (earth work)

2. The minimum limit of grades.

Drainage purpose

In this project the two cases are taken in to account as recommended by ERA 2001.

2.2.2.1.2 Vertical curves


A vertical curve provides a smooth transition between two tangent grades. There are two
types of vertical curves. Crest vertical curves and sag vertical curves.
When a vertical curve connects a positive grade with a negative grade, it is

referred to as a crest curve.


When a vertical curve connects a negative grade with a positive grade, it is
termed as a sag curve.
In this project crest and sage curves are applied to create a smooth transition between
these grades.

Length of vertical curves


Crest curves:
For crest curves, the most important consideration in determining the length of the curve
is the sight distance requirement.
67
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Sight distance
stopping and
passing sight distance

Sag curves:
For sag curves, the criteria for determining the length of the curve are:

vehicle headlight distance,


rider comfort,
drainage control and
General appearance.

When the computed curve length for the above requirements is less than the minimum
curve length recommended by ERA2001, this recommended value is taken as curve
length.

Error! Not a valid link.Site distance (Both stopping and passing)


For Crest Vertical Curve
The stopping sight distance is the controlling factor in determining the length of a crest
vertical curve.
Minimum Length required for safe stopping calculated (from AASHTO)

When Sd Lvcmin

When Sd Lvcmin

The 100 in the above equations are to convert A from % into decimals.
Where Lvc min = Minimum length of vertical curve compute
Sd = Min. Stopping Sight Distance = 85 m for mountainous terrain.
Psd = Min. Passing Sight Distance

= 225 m for mountainous terrain.


68

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Sight distances should be checked during design, and adjustments made to meet the
minimum requirements. The following values should be used for the determination of
sight lines. Shown in the figures below:

Fig 2-12 Site distance for crust curve

ERA Manual recommends that:


h1= Driver's eye height

= 1.07 meters

h2 = Object height for stopping sight distance = 0.15 meters


= Object height for passing sight distance:

= 1.30 meters

For sag Vertical Curve


Figure below shows the drivers sight limitation when approaching a sag vertical curve.
The problem is more obvious during the night time when the sight of the driver is
restricted by the area projected by the headlight beams of vehicle. Hence, the angle of the
beam from the horizontal plane is also important. This design control criteria is known as
69
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

headlight sight distance. The headlight height of h = 0.6 m and upward angle for the
headlight projection cone of =1 is normally assumed. The governing equations are
(from AASHTO)

When Sd Lvcmin

When Sd Lvcmin

Fig 2-13 Site distance for sag curve


A driver may experience discomfort when passing a vertical curve. The effect of
discomfort is more obvious on a sag vertical curve than a crest vertical curve with the
same radius, because the gravitational and centripetal forces are in the opposite
directions. Some of the ride discomfort may be compensated by combination of vehicle
weight, suspension system and tire flexibility. The following equation has been
recommended by AASHTO as the minimum length of a vertical curve that will provide
satisfactory level of ride comfort.

70
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Rolling

Mountainous

Escarpment

Urban/Peri- Urban

Design standards from ERA manual:

km/h

85

70

60

50

50

Min. Stopping Sight Distance

155

110

85

55

55

Min. Passing Sight Distance

340

275

225

175

175

% Passing Opportunity

25

25

15

20

Max. Gradient (desirable)

Max. Gradient (absolute)

Minimum Gradient

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

Crest Vertical Curve

60

31

18

10

10

Sag Vertical Curve

36

25

18

12

12

Design Element

Design Speed

Unit

Flat

Table 2-13 Design Parameters for Design Standard DS4 (Paved)

Phasing: Even if we face phasing problem on vertical curve 1 with horizontal curve 3
and vertical curve 3 with horizontal curve 5, we took a corrective action by separating
them again vertical curve 2 and horizontal curve 4 corrected by making the ends of the
curves to end at a common station in the design process according to ERA.

2.2.2.2. Computation of gradients


1. Gradient of the first alignment (g1)
To calculate the first gradient;
Elevation of the first point

= 1386 m

Elevation of the second point

= 1395.4 m

Elevation difference

= 1395.4-1386 = 9.4 m
71

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Horizontal distance b/n the two points = (13+572)-(12+500) = 1072 m


Gradient (Slope) = elevation difference/horizontal distance
= (9.4/1072) = 0.0088
Gradient (Slope) g1 = 0.88 %
2. Gradient of the second alignment (g2)
To calculate the second gradient;
Elevation of the first point

= 1395.4 m

Elevation of the second point

= 1375 m

Elevation difference

= 1375-1395.4 = -20.4 m

Horizontal distance b/n the two points = (14+000)-(13+572) = 428 m


Slope (gradient) = elevation difference/ horizontal distance
= -20.4/430 = -0.0477
Gradient (Slope) g2 = -4.77 %
3. Gradient of the third alignment (g3)
To calculate the third gradient
Elevation of the first point

= 1375 m

Elevation of the second point

= 1377 m

Elevation difference

= 1377-1375 = 2m

Horizontal distance b/n the two points = (14+480)-(14+000) = 480m


Gradient (Slope)

= elevation difference/ horizontal distance


= (2/480) = 0.0042

Gradient (Slope) g3 = 0.42 %


72
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

4. Gradient of the forth alignment (g4)


To calculate the forth gradient
Elevation of the first point

= 1377 m

Elevation of the second point

= 1352 m

Elevation difference

= 1352-1377 = -25

Horizontal distance b/n the two points = (15+500)-(14+480) = 1020m


Slope (gradient) = elevation difference/ horizontal distance
= -25/1020 = -0.0245
Gradient (Slope) g4= -2.45%
Elevation
Grade

First point

second
point

station
Elev. diff.

First point

Second
point

Horizontal
distance(m)

Slope
(%)

g1

1386

1395.4

9.4

12500

13572

1072

0.88

g2

1395.4

1375

-20.4

13572

14000

428

-4.77

g3

1375

1377

14000

14480

480

0.42

g4

1377

1352

-25

14480

15500

1020

-2.45

Table 2-14: Summery of gradients of vertical alignment

2.2.2.5 Computation of vertical curve elements


There are three vertical curves in this project;
The first vertical curve is a crest curve connects a positive grade with a negative grade;
i.e. 0.88 % and -4.77 %.
The second curve is a sag curve connects a negative grade with a positive grade ;
i.e. -4.77 % and 0.42 %.
73
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

The third curve is a crest curve connects a positive grade with a negative grade;
i.e. 0.42 % and -2.45 %.
1. For Curve one (crest curve)
Station of PVI
Elevation PVI

=
=

13+572
1395.4 m

Gradient, g1 =

0.88 %

Gradient, g2 =

-4.77 %

Grade Algebraic difference of grades (A)


A = g2-g1 =0.88 - (-4.77) = /5.64/ = 5.64 %
Computation of the curve length
a)

Curve length required for minimum curvature, k


The value of K = 18 for DS4 from design standard, and Mountainous
Lvcmin = AK = 5.64*18 = 101.58 m

But to get smooth vertical curve to different safety purpose we increase LVC from 101.58
to 120 m
b) Length required for safe stopping

When Sd Lvcmin

c) Length required for safe passing


74
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

When Sd Lvcmin

d) Length required for ride comfort

e) Length required for aesthetic (appearance)


Lvcmin = 30 *A = 30*5.64 =169m
There fore the maximum of the above values

Lvcmin = 301.90 m is to be provided as

curve length, but this curve length over lap with one side of horizontal curve. Therefore
we provide minimum curve length recommended by ERA2001, which is LC = 200m. So
this value is provided as curve length and we post traffic sign that prevent passing for that
specific area.

Curve grade tabulation


From above table 2-14; g1=0.88 %, g2 = -4.77 % and LVC = 200 m,
Elev.PVI = 1395.4 m
Elev.PVC = Elev.PVI (g1* LVC/2 )
= 1395.4 (0.0088*200/2) = 1394.52 m
75
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Finished grade = (Ele.PVC +g1x) + ((g2-g1) x2)/2LV

STA.PVC

g1*X%

Tangent
grade(Ele.PVC+g1x)

(g2- g1)x2)/2LVC

Finished
grade

13472

1394.62

1394.52

13492

20

0.16

1394.77

-0.06

1394.64

13512

40

0.31

1394.93

-0.22

1394.65

13532

60

0.47

1395.09

-0.50

1394.54

13552

80

0.63

1395.24

-0.89

1394.32

13572

100

0.78

1395.40

-1.39

1393.99

13592

120

0.94

1395.56

-2.00

1393.54

13612

140

1.10

1395.71

-2.72

1392.99

13632

160

1.25

1395.87

-3.55

1392.31

13652

180

1.41

1396.03

-4.50

1391.53

13672

200

1.57

1396.18

-5.55

1390.63

Table 2-15 finished grade tabulation for curve-1

Fig. 2-14 elements of vertical curve-1


76
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2.

2010

Curve Two (sag curve)


Elements of sag curve.
Station of PVI

= 14+000

Elevation PVI

= 1383.63 m

Grade Algebraic difference of grades (A)


Gradient ( g1)

= -4.77 %

, Gradient(g2) = 0.42 %

A = g2-g1 = 0.42-(-4.77) = /5.18/

= 5.18 %

Computation of the curve length

a) Curve length required for minimum curvature, k


The value of K = 25 for DS4 design standard, and Rolling.
L =AK=5.18*25 = 129.50 m
But to get smooth vertical curve for different safety purpose we increase L VC from
129.50 to 150 m

b) Length required for safe stopping


When Sd Lvcmin

c) Length required for safe passing


When Sd Lvcmin

77
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

d) Length required for ride comfort

e) Length required for aesthetic (appearance)


Lvcmin = 30 *A = 30*5.18 =155 m
There fore the maximum of the above values

Lvcmin = 352.92 m is to be provided as

curve length. But to get smooth vertical curve for different safety purpose we increase
LVC from 352.92 to 362 m.
Curve grade tabulation
From above table 2-14 ; g1= 0.42 , g2 = -4.77 , and LVC = 362 m, Elev.PVI = 1375 m
Elev.PVC = Elev.PVI (g1* LVC/2)
= 1395.4 (0.0042*362/2) = 1383.63 m
Finished grade= (Ele.PVC +g1x) + ((g2-g1) x2)/2LVC)
Tangent grade

((g2-g1)x2)

(Ele.PVC +g1x)

2LVC

1383.63

1383.63

20

-0.95

1382.67

0.03

1382.70

13859

40

-1.91

1381.72

0.11

1381.84

13879

60

-2.86

1380.77

0.26

1381.03

13899

80

-3.81

1379.81

0.46

1380.27

STA.PVC

g1*X%

13819

13839

Finished grade

78
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

13919

100

-4.77

1378.86

0.72

1379.58

13939

120

-5.72

1377.91

1.03

1378.94

13959

140

-6.67

1376.95

1.40

1378.36

13979

160

-7.63

1376.00

1.83

1377.83

13999

180

-8.58

1375.05

2.32

1377.37

14019

200

-9.53

1374.09

2.86

1376.96

14039

220

-10.49

1373.14

3.46

1376.61

14059

240

-11.44

1372.19

4.12

1376.31

14079

260

-12.39

1371.23

4.84

1376.07

14099

280

-13.35

1370.28

5.61

1375.89

14119

300

-14.30

1369.33

6.44

1375.77

14139

320

-15.25

1368.37

7.33

1375.71

14159

340

-16.21

1367.42

8.28

1375.70

14179

360

-17.16

1366.47

9.28

1375.75

14181

362

-17.25

1366.37

9.38

1375.75

Table 2-16 finished grade tabulation for curve-2

Fig. 2-15 elements of vertical curve-2


79
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Curve Three (Crest curve)

Station of PVI
Elevation PVI

=
=

14+480
1377m

Gradient (g1) =

0.42 %

Gradient (g2) =

-2.45 %

Grade Algebraic difference of grades (A)


A = g2-g1 =0.42 - (-2.45) = /2.87/ = 2.87 %
Computation of the curve length
a) Curve length required for minimum curvature, k
The value of K = 31 for DS4 design standard, and Rolling
Lvcmin = AK = 2.87*31 = 88.90 m
But to get smooth vertical curve to different safety purpose we increase LVC from
88.90 to 120
b) Length required for safe stopping

When Sd Lvcmi

c) Length required for safe passing

80
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

When Sd Lvcmi

d) Length required for ride comfort

e) Length required for aesthetic (appearance)


Lvcmin = 30 *A =30*2.87 = 86 m
There fore the maximum of the above values

Lvcmin = 220.47 m is to be provided as

curve length. But to get smooth vertical curve to different safety purpose we increase
LVC from 220.47 to 240m.
Curve grade tabulation
From above table: - g1=0.42, g2 = -2.45 and LVC = 240 m, Elev.PVI = 1377 m
Elev.PVC = Elev.PVI (g1* LVC/2) = 1377 (0.0042*240/2) = 1376.50m
Finished grade= (Ele.PVC +g1x) + ((g2-g1) x2)/2LVC)
Tangent grade

(g2-g1)x2)

STA.PVC

g1*X%

(Ele.PVC
+g1x)

2LVC

Finished
grade

14360

1376.50

1376.50

81
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

14380

20

0.083

1376.58

-0.02

1376.56

14400

40

0.167

1376.67

-0.10

1376.57

14420

60

0.250

1376.75

-0.22

1376.53

14440

80

0.333

1376.83

-0.38

1376.45

14460

100

0.417

1376.92

-0.60

1376.32

14480

120

0.500

1377.00

-0.86

1376.14

14500

140

0.583

1377.08

-1.17

1375.91

14520

160

0.667

1377.17

-1.53

1375.64

14540

180

0.750

1377.25

-1.94

1375.31

14560

200

0.833

1377.33

-2.39

1374.94

14580

220

0.917

1377.42

-2.89

1374.53

14600

240

1.000

1377.50

-3.44

1374.06

Table 2-17 finished grade tabulation for curve-3

Fig. 2-16 elements of vertical curve-3


Vertical
Curve
VC1

LVCmin

LVC adj

LVC
provide

Sta. PVI

Sta.PVC

Sta.PVT

Elev.PVI

Elev.PVC

5.64

18

101.58

120

200

13+572

13+472

13+672

1395.4

1394.52

82
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

VC2

5.18

25

129.50

150

362

14+000

13+819

14+181

1375

1383.63

VC3

2.87

31

88.90

120

240

14+480

14+360

14+600

1377

1376.50

Table 2-18 summery of vertical curves

2.2.3

Road cross sections

A cross sectional elements in the high way design pertains to those features which deals
with its width. They will normally consist of the carriage way, shoulders, right of way,
roadway width, pavement width, the median, side slopes, drainage features and earth
work profiles.
Carriage way:
The part of the road constructed for use by moving traffic as traffic lanes. For our project
for DS4 and main access road ERA recommends 6.7m.
Lane width
Feature of a high way having great influence on safety and comfort in the width of the
carriage way, due to this we use a lane width of 3.35 m which is recommended for DS4
road are shown in table 2.6 ERA 2001 for all roads design standards.

83
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Shoulders
Shoulder is:

Is the portion of the road between the outer edges and the edges of the carriageway are called shoulders.

Is the portion of the roadway contiguous to the carriageway for the


accommodation of stopped vehicles; traditional and intermediate non-motorized
traffic, animals, and pedestrians; emergency use; the recovery of errant vehicles;
and lateral support of the pavement courses. It will provide wherever possible for
emergency stopping and lateral support of the carriageway pavement.

Where the carriageway is paved, the shoulder should also be sealed with a single
bituminous surface treatment. This has several advantages. It would prevent edge
raveling and maintenance problems associated with parking on a gravel shoulder.
Sealing of the shoulder is recommended under the following conditions:
Where the total resulting gradient exceeds 25 per cent, it is recommended for
paved shoulder as the width is only 1m; this will reduce the frequent
maintenance needs in mountainous and escarpment terrains.
Where the shoulder material is readily erodible or where the availability of
material for shoulder maintenance is restricted.
Wherever there is significant pedestrian traffic in town and village areas.
Based on the above idea, ERA recommends a shoulder width based on design standard
and terrain classification. So, for this project since most of the route has a terrain of
rolling we took 1.5m for shoulder width as recommended by ERA manual. So, we took
1.5m shoulder throughout the route simplicity of the construction.
Road way:

84
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

It consists of the carriage way and shoulders and parking lanes. I.e., for this project road
way width will be 6.7+1.5+1.5=9.7m
Right-of-way
It is the width of the land secured and preserved to the public for road purposes. The
right-of-way should be adequate to accommodate all the elements that make-up the cross
section of the high way and may reasonably provide future development.
For this project having design standard of DS4, ERA recommends a right of way width to
be 50m for all terrain type.
Normal cross fall
Normal cross fall should be sufficient to provide adequate surface drainage whilst not
being so great as to make steering difficult, but it should facilitate drainage of the
pavement. It is depend up on the smooth of the surface and the intensity of the rain fall.
Therefore, we took 2.5% for normal cross fall for design standard of DS4 as
recommended by ERA.
Shoulder cross fall
It should be designed steeper than the pavement to facilitate quick drainage. Therefore we
took 4% for shoulder cross slope as recommended by ERA.
Side slope and back slope
Side slopes and back slopes should be designed to insure the stability of the road way and
to provide a reasonable opportunity for recovery of an out-of-control vehicle.
The selection of a side slope and back slope is depending on safety consideration, height
of cut or fill and economic consideration. ERA 2001 table 6.1 indicates the side slope
recommended for use in the design according to the height of cut and fill and the
material.

85
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

material
Earth
soil

rock

Height of slope

2010

Side slope
cut

fill

Back
slope

or 0.0-1.0m

1:4

1:4

1:3

1.0-2.0m

1:3

1:3

1:2

Over 2m

1:2

1:2

1:1.5

Any height

See standard details

Table2-19 Side and back slope


Depending to the given standard ratio our project is designed and set out the appropriate
and economical road section.

Fig 2-17 Elements of road cross section

86
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

Section-3:
3.1

2010

Drainage Standards and Structure Design

General

87
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

88
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

89
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2.2

2010

Minor drainage analysis and design

2.2.1

Hydrological/ Hydraulic Analysis of Ditch

90
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

runoff

ra inf all

a)

overlandtraveldis tan ce
velocityoflow

V 1 R 3 S 2

91
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

-
-

92
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

93
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

)
)

94
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

1 3 2
R S
n

95
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

2.2.2 Structural design of ditch

96
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

)
)

97
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

Catchment
Area

A(ha)

upper
elev.

Cc

2010

lower
elev.

L(m)

s(%)

Tc(s)

TC
provide

Q(m3/s)

2.18

0.25

1410.5

1385

312.84

0.08

4.27

7.0

180

0.27

3.22

0.25

1408.5

1385

306.53

0.08

4.31

7.0

180

0.40

7.88

0.25

1406.5

1387

365.89

0.05

5.68

7.0

180

0.99

14.00

0.25

1410.5

1387

500.26

0.05

7.58

7.6

149

1.45

6.11

0.25

1410

1386

334.31

0.07

4.72

7.0

180

0.76

3.70

0.25

1408

1386

400.79

0.05

6.02

7.0

180

0.46

9.75

0.25

1400

1366

431.99

0.08

5.55

7.0

180

1.22

7.57

0.25

1393.5

1366

367.12

0.07

4.99

7.0

180

0.95

32.57

0.25

1391

1346

1082.8

0.04

14.40

14.4

135

3.06

10

0.82

0.25

1352

1346

354.64

0.02

8.62

8.6

165

0.09

A ha

Cp

Bed
Slope%

L(m)

Cath.

L(m)

W(m)

Tc (s)

Tcprovide

Qasp(m3/s)

95.35

6.85

0.0653

0.95

0.025

93.8

2.6633

180

0.031273

133.18

6.85

0.0912

0.95

0.025

130.9

3.4425

180

0.04368

318.91

6.85

0.2185

0.95

0.025

310.62

6.6964

180

0.104595

526.1

6.85

0.3604

0.95

0.025

495.06

9.5877

9.6

155

0.148584

213.72

6.85

0.1464

0.95

0.025

206.78

4.8952

180

0.070095

85.79

6.85

0.0588

0.95

0.025

93

2.6458

180

0.028137

188.37

6.85

0.129

0.95

0.025

190.74

4.6001

180

0.061781

183.74

6.85

0.1259

0.95

0.025

183.94

4.4733

180

0.060263

1206.4

6.85

0.8264

0.95

0.025

1136.71

18.184

18.2

110

0.241794

10

31.8

6.85

0.0218

0.95

0.025

45.68

1.5304

180

0.01043

98
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

Q,asphalt(m3/s)

2010

Q,the
land(m3/s) Q total

B( bott
om)

B(top)

Velocity

Free
board
(m)

D
provide

0.031

0.27

0.30

0.016

0.26

0.30

0.61

2.53

0.3

0.56

0.044

0.4

0.44

0.016

0.30

0.35

0.70

2.79

0.3

0.60

0.105

0.99

1.09

0.016

0.42

0.49

0.98

3.51

0.3

0.72

0.149

1.45

1.60

0.016

0.49

0.57

1.13

3.85

0.3

0.79

0.070

0.76

0.83

0.016

0.38

0.44

0.89

3.27

0.3

0.68

0.028

0.46

0.49

0.016

0.31

0.36

0.73

2.86

0.3

0.61

0.062

1.22

1.28

0.016

0.45

0.52

1.04

3.65

0.3

0.75

0.060

0.95

1.01

0.016

0.41

0.48

0.96

3.44

0.3

0.71

0.242

3.06

3.30

0.016

0.64

0.74

1.49

4.63

0.3

0.94

0.010

0.09

0.10

0.016

0.17

0.20

0.40

1.92

0.3

0.47

99
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

3.3.3 Hydraulics design of


culvert
A culvert is a type of structure that can transmit water as full or partly full. It is a structure
that is designed hydraulically to take advantage of submergence to increase hydraulic
capacity. It is also used to convey surface runoff through embankments. A culvert can be
a structure, as distinguished from bridges, that is usually covered with an embankment
and is composed of structural material around the entire perimeter.
A culvert can be a structure that is 6 meters or less in centerline span length, or between
the extreme ends of openings for multiple boxes.
Full flow is not common for culverts unless governed by a high downstream water
surface elevation. Full flow can be described by fundamental pipe flow. Partly full flow
culverts follow the law of open channel flow and need to be classified as either sub
critical or supercritical flow to accomplish the design procedure.

The following are concepts that are important in the hydraulics of culvert design:
Critical depth- the depth at which the specific energy of a given flow rate is at a
minimum. For a given discharge and cross-section geometry, there is only one critical
depth.
Crown- the inside top of the culvert.
Outlet- has tail water equal to or lower than critical depth. For culverts with free outlets, a
lowering of the tail water has no effect on the discharge or the backwater profile upstream
of the tail water.
Improved Inlet- has an entrance geometry that decreases the flow constriction at the inlet
and thus increases the capacity of culverts. These inlets are referred to as either side- or
slope-tapered (walls or bottom tapered).

100
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Invert- is the flow line of the culvert (inside bottom).


Normal flow- occurs in a channel reach when the discharge, velocity, and depth of flow
do not change throughout the reach. The water surface profile and channel bottom slope
will be parallel. This type of flow will exist in a culvert operating on a steep slope if the
culvert is sufficiently long enough.
Slope - Steep water surface slope occurs where the critical depth is greater than the
normal depth. Mild slope occurs where critical depth is less than normal depth.
Submerged- A submerged outlet occurs where the tail water elevation is higher than the
crown of the culvert. A submerged inlet occurs where the headwater is greater than 1.2D.

Design criteria
Listed below by categories are the design criteria that should be considered for all culvert
designs.

Site criteria
Structure Type Selection
The type of drainage structure specified for a particular location is often determined
based on economic considerations. The following can serve as a guide in the selection of
the type of structure, proceeding from the most expensive to the least expensive. Culverts
are used where bridges are not hydraulically required, where debris is tolerable, and
where they are more economical than a bridge. Culverts can be concrete box culverts,
reinforced concrete pipe culverts, or corrugated metal culverts.
Length and Slope
The culvert length and slope should be chosen to approximate existing topography, and to
the degree practicable:

101
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

the culvert invert shall normally be aligned with the channel bottom and
the skew angle of the stream, and

the culvert entrance shall match the geometry of the roadway.

Design Features
Culvert Sizes and Shapethe culvert size and shape selected is to be based on
engineering and economic criteria related to site conditions. In evaluating the suitability
of alternate materials, the selection process shall be based on a comparison of the total
cost of alternate materials over the design life of the structure that is dependent upon the
following:

durability (service life),

cost

availability

construction and maintenance ease

structural strength,

traffic delays

abrasion and corrosion resistance, and

water tightness requirements.

Inlet and Outlet Control


Inlet Control
For inlet control, the control section is at the upstream end of the barrel (the inlet). The
flow passes through critical depth near the inlet and becomes shallow, high velocity
(supercritical) flow in the culvert barrel. Depending on the tail water, a hydraulic jump
may occur downstream of the inlet.
102
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Typical shapes are rectangular, circular, elliptical, and arch.


NomographsThe inlet control flow versus headwater curves, which are established
using the above procedure, are the basis for constructing the inlet control design
nomographs. Note that in the inlet control nomographs, HW is measured to the total
upstream energy grade line including the approach velocity head.
Outlet Control
Outlet control has depths and velocity that are subcritical. The control of the flow is at the
downstream end of the culvert (the outlet). The tailwater depth is assumed to be critical
depth near the culvert outlet or in the downstream channel, whichever is higher.
In a given culvert, the type of flow is dependent on all of the barrel factors. All of the
inlet control factors also influence culverts in outlet control.
Tailwater Elevationbased on the downstream water surface elevation. Backwater
calculations from a downstream control, a normal depth approximation, or field
observations are used to define the tailwater elevation.
HydraulicsFull flow in the culvert barrel is assumed for the analysis of outlet control
hydraulics. Outlet control flow conditions can be calculated based on an energy balance
from the tailwater pool to the headwater pool.

Design Equations
Equations and Definitions
Losses
HL = HE + Hf+ Hv + Hb + Hj + Hg
Where:
HL = total energy loss, m
HE = entrance loss, m
103
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Hf = friction losses, m
Hv = exit loss (velocity head), m
Hb = bend losses, m
Hj = losses at junctions, m
Hg = losses at grates, m
Velocity
V = Q/A Where:
V = average barrel velocity, m/s
Q = flow rate, m3/s
A = cross sectional area of flow with the barrel full, m2
Velocity Head
Hv = V2/2g where g = acceleration due to gravity, 9.8 m/s2
Entrance loss
He = Ke (V2/2g) where Ke = entrance loss coefficient,
Friction Loss
Hf = [(19.63n2L)/R1.33] [V2/2g)
Where:
n = Mannings roughness coefficient
L = length of the culvert barrel, m
R = hydraulic radius of the full culvert barrel = A/P, m
P = wetted perimeter of the barrel, m
104
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Exit Loss
Ho = 1.0 [(V2/2g) - (Vd2/2g)]
Where: Vd = channel velocity downstream of the culvert, m/s (usually

neglected)

& Ho = Hv = V2/2g
Barrel Losses
H = He + Ho+Hf
H = [1 + Ke + (19.63n2L/R1.33)] [V2/2g]
Energy Grade Linethe energy grade line represents the total energy at any point along
the culvert barrel. Equating the total energy upstream and downstream of the culvert
barrel in the following relationship results:
HWo + ( Vu2/2g) = TW + (Vd2/2g) + HL
Where:
HWo = headwater depth above the outlet invert, m
Vu = approach velocity, m/s
TW = tailwater depth above the outlet invert, m
Vd = downstream velocity, m/s
HL = sum of all losses
Hydraulic Grade Linethe hydraulic grade line is the depth to which water would rise in
vertical tubes connected to the sides of the culvert barrel. In full flow, the energy grade
line and the hydraulic grade line are parallel lines separated by the velocity head except at
the inlet and the outlet.
Nomographs (full flow)The nomographs were developed assuming that the culvert
barrel is flowing full and:
105
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

TW > D, Flow Type IV Outlet Control or

dc > D, Flow Type VI Inlet Control

Vu is small and its velocity head can be considered a part of the

2010

available

headwater (HW) used to convey the flow through the culvert.

Vd is small and its velocity head can be neglected.


HW = TW + H - SoL
Where:
HW = depth from the inlet invert to the energy grade line, m
H = is the value read from the nomographs, m
SoL = drop from inlet to outlet invert, m

TW should be used if higher than (dc + D)/2.


The following equation should be used:
HW =ho+ H -SoL
Where:
ho = max of(TW ,(dc + D)/2)) m
Adequate results are obtained down to a HW = 0.75D. For lower

headwaters,

backwater calculations are required.


Outlet Velocity
Culvert outlet velocities should be calculated to determine the need for erosion protection
at the culvert exit. Culverts usually give outlet velocities that are higher than the natural
stream velocities. These outlet velocities may require flow readjustment or energy
dissipation to prevent downstream erosion. If outlet erosion protection is necessary, the
flow depths and Freud number may also be needed.
106
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

In Inlet Control
If water surface profile (drawdown) calculations are necessary, begin at dc at the entrance
and proceed downstream to the exit. Determine at the exit the depth and flow area. Use
normal depth and velocity. This approximation may be used since the water surface
profile converges towards normal depth if the culvert is of adequate length. The outlet
velocity may be slightly higher than the actual velocity at the outlet.

In Outlet Control

The cross sectional area of the flow is defined by the geometry of the outlet and
either critical depth, tailwater depth, or the height of the conduit:

Critical depth is used when the tailwater level is less than critical depth.

Tailwater depth is used when tailwater is greater than critical depth, but below the
top of the barrel.

The total barrel area is used when the tailwater level exceeds the top of the barrel

Roadway Overtopping
Roadway overtopping will begin when the headwater rises to the elevation of the
roadway. The overtopping will usually occur at the low point of a sag vertical curve on
the roadway. The flow will be similar to flow over a broad crested weir.
Qr= Cd L HWr 1.5
Where:
107
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Qr = overtopping flow rate, m3/s.


Cd = overtopping discharge coefficient (weir coefficient) = kf Cr.
kt = submergence coefficient.
Cr = discharge coefficient.
L = length of the roadway crest, m.
HWr = the upstream depth, measured above the roadway crest, m.
Total Flowcalculated for a given upstream water surface elevation using equation. In
this equation, roadway overflow plus culvert flow must equal total design flow. A trial
and error process is necessary to determine the flow passing through the culvert and the
amount flowing across the roadway.
Performance Curves
A performance curve is a plot of flow rate versus headwater depth or elevation, velocity,
or outlet scour. The culvert performance curve is made up of the controlling portions of
the individual performance curves for each of the following control sections.
Design Procedure
Step 1 Assemble Site Data and Project File
Hydrographic Survey - Data include

topographic, site, and location maps

embankment cross section

roadway profile

Step 2 Determine Hydrology. Minimum data requireddrainage area maps and


discharge-frequency plots

108
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Step 3 Designs Downstream Channel. Minimum data are cross section of channel and the
rating curve for channel
Step 4 Summarize Data on Design Form use data from Steps 1-3
Step 5 Select Design Alternative
Step 6 Select Design Discharge Qd
Step 7 Determine Inlet Control Headwater Depth (HWi)

for a box shape use Q per foot of width

Locate HW/D ratio using a straightedge

extend a straight line from the culvert size through the flow rate

mark the first HW/D scale. Extend a horizontal line to the desired scale, read
HW/D, and note on Charts

Calculate headwater depth (HW)

multiply HW/D by D to obtain HW to energy grade line

neglecting the approach velocity HWi = HW

including the approach velocity HWi = HW - approach velocity head

Step 8 Determine Outlet Control Headwater Depth at Inlet (HWoi)


Calculate the tail water depth (TW) using the design flow rate and normal

depth (single

section) or using a water surface profile


Calculate critical depth (dc)

locate flow rate and read dc

dc cannot exceed D

109
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Calculate (dc + D)/2


Determine (ho)

ho = the larger of TW or (dc + D/2)

Determine entrance loss coefficient (KE) from ERA design manual Table7-2
Determine losses through the culvert barrel (H):
- use (L) if Mannings n matches the n value of the culvert and- use (L1) to

adjust

for a different culvert n value


L1 = L(n1/n)2
Where:
L1 = adjusted culvert length, m
L = actual culvert length, m
n1 = desired Manning n value
n = Manning n value on chart

mark point on turning line

- use a straightedge and


- connect size with the length

read (H)

- use a straightedge
- connect Q and turning point and
- Read (H) on Head Loss scale
Calculate outlet control headwater (HW)
110
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

use equation above, if Vu and Vd are neglected

HWoi = H + ho - SoL
if HWoi is less than 1.2D and control is outlet control
- the barrel may flow partly full
- the approximate method of using the greater tailwater or (dc+ D)/2

may not be

applicable
- backwater calculations should be used to check the result and
- if the headwater depth falls below 0.75D, the approximate
- method shall not be used
Step 9 Determine Controlling Headwater (HWc)

compare HWi and HWoi, use the higher

HWc = HWi, if HWi > HWoi


- the culvert is in inlet control

HWc = HWoi, if HWoi > HWi


- the culvert is in outlet control.

Step 10 Compute Discharge over the Roadway (Qr)


1. Calculate depth above the roadway (HWr)
HWr = HWc - HWov
HWov = height of road above inlet invert
2. If HWr 0 , Qr = 0
If HWr > 0, determine Qr
111
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Step 11 Compute Total Discharge (Qt)


Qt = Qd + Qr
Step 12 Calculate Outlet Velocity (Vo) and Depth (dn)
If inlet control is the controlling headwater
1. Calculate flow depth at culvert exit
use water surface profile
2. Calculate flow area (A)
3. Calculate exit velocity (Vo) = Q/A
If outlet control is the controlling headwater
1. Calculate flow depth at culvert exit

weuse (dc) if dc > TW

weuse (TW) if dc < TW< D

weuse (D) if D < TW

2. Calculate flow area (A)


3. Calculate exit velocity (Vo) = Q/A
Step 13 Review Results
Compare alternative design with constraints and assumptions, if any of the
following are exceeded, repeat Steps 5 through 12
Step 14 Plot Performance Curve
Repeat Steps 6 through 12 with a range of discharges

Qmax if no overtopping is possible


112

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Qmax = largest flood that can be estimated

Step 15 Related Designs


Culverts out let velocities
The high out let velocities observed at the culvert out let may results in excessive scour of
the channel in the vicinity of the outlet. The variety in the soil type of natural channels
and varying flowing characteristics at the culvert outlet enforces the use different
methods to control or protect the channel against potential damaging effects. Some of the
common used techniques to provide protection against scour are:
1. Minor structural element
2. Velocity protection devices
3. Velocity control devices
Minor structural element
Provision of this Minor structural element is done when the culverts exit velocity is 30%
greater than that of the velocity in its natural channel. It minimizes the structural
instabilities. Example Cutoff walls.
Velocity protection devices
For exit velocity greater than 1.3 of velocity in natural channel and less than 2.5 of the
velocity in natural channel.In this case armoring riprap is used. This may be;
Concrete riprap, Vegetation,Synthetic sodding.
Velocity control device
For exit velocity greater than 2.5 of that of natural channels velocity. (In this case energy
dissipater is required.
Nomograph Design
Detail design for channel 4
113
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

The following steps show the procedures we followed step by Step to design a culvert for
channel-4 for in the project area especially near the station 15+440.
Step 1 Assemble Site Data and Project File
a. Site survey project file contains:

roadway profile and

embankment cross section

no sediment or debris problems and

Cross-Section
Design criteria we have used 25yrs return period for our design purpose because our road
to be designed is DS4.
Step 2 Determining Hydrology using
Rational method equations yield
Q25=16.5m3/s,

Q50=17.9m3/s

Step 3 Design Downstream Channel


Point

Station, m

Elevation, m

15+400

1346.3

15+410

1346.5

15+420

1346.7

15+430

1346.9

15+440

1346.9

15+450

1347.1

15+460

1347.2

15+470

1347.3

15+480

1347.4
114

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

10

15+490

1347.5

11

15+500

1347.6

Table 3-2 down stream station

Culvert Design-Example
X-Section At
Tail Water
Chainage

Dist, m

Level

15+400

1350.50

15+410

10

1350.30

15+420

20

1349.60

15+430

30

1348.00

15+440

40

1346.30

15+450

50

1348.20

15+460

60

1350.20

15+470

70

1352.00

15+480

80

1353.00

15+490

90

1354.20

15+500

100

1355.00

Table 3-3 X-Section At Tail Water

115
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Step 3 Design downstream channel

0.00

v:h =1:2
v:h =1:2

b=10m

The stream channel can be approximated to trapezoidal channel


B= 10m

Slope 2:1

H:V

Channel material- clean straight, no rims or deep pools n =0.03


no sediment debris problem
Slope (s)

0.006

Table 3-4 Down stream chanal

The rating curve for the channel calculated by normal depth yields:
116
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

Width
Depth,m (B), m

2010

Area,m2

P, m

R,m

Q=AV,
V=(1/n)R^2/3S^1/2 m3/s

0.10

10

1.02

12.24

0.08

0.006

0.03

0.49

0.50

0.30

10

3.18

12.24

0.26

0.006

0.03

1.05

3.34

0.50

10

5.50

12.24

0.45

0.006

0.03

1.52

8.33

0.70

10

7.92

12.24

0.65

0.006

0.03

1.93

15.29

0.73

10

8.30

12.24

0.68

0.006

0.03

1.99

16.55

0.76

10

8.70

12.24

0.71

0.006

0.03

2.06

17.91

0.90

10

10.62

12.24

0.87

0.006

0.03

2.35

24.95

1.00

10

12.00

12.24

0.98

0.006

0.03

2.55

30.58

1.05

10

12.71

12.24

1.04

0.006

0.03

2.65

33.64

1.10

10

13.42

12.24

1.10

0.006

0.03

2.75

36.85

1.20

10

14.88

12.24

1.22

0.006

0.03

2.94

43.77

1.50

10

19.50

12.24

1.59

0.006

0.03

3.52

68.69

1.700

10

22.78

12.24

1.86

0.006

0.03

3.91

89.01

Table 3-5 The rating curve for the channel calculated by normal depth yields:
Q (m3/s)

TW (m)

Elev,m asl

Velocity(m/s)

0.5

0.1

1346.3

0.49

3.34

0.3

1346.5

1.05

8.33

0.5

1346.9

1.52

15.29

0.7

1346.9

1.93

16.55

0.73

1347.1

1.99

24.95

0.9

1347.2

2.06

30.58

1.0

1347.3

2.35

36.85

1.05

1347.3

2.55

Downstream
117
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

Q m3/s

Depth,m

2010

Elev,masl

0.50

0.10

1346.3

3.34

0.30

1346.5

8.33

0.50

1346.7

15.29

0.70

1346.9

16.55

0.73

1346.9

24.95

0.90

1347.1

30.58

1.00

1347.2

33.64

1.05

1347.3

36.85

1.10

1347.3

43.77

1.20

1347.4

68.69

1.50

1347.7

89.01

1.700

1347.9

Table 3-6 down stream rating curve

Step 5 Select Design Alternative


Shape - box Size - 3000 mm by 2000 mm
Material concrete Entrance- Wingwalls, for 30o flare
Step 6 Select Design Discharge
Qd=16.5m3/5
Step 7 Determine Inlet Control Headwater Depth (HWi)
Use inlet control nomograph - Chart 7-6
a. D = 2 m
b. Q/B = 16.5/3 = 5.5
118
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

c. HW/D = 1.2, for 30o flare


d. HWi = (HW/D)*D
= (1.2)(2m)
= 2.4m (Neglect the approach velocity)
Step 8 Determine Outlet Control Headwater Depth at Inlet (HWoi)
a. TW =0.73 m for Q50 = 16.5 m3/s
b. dc = 1.43 m from Chart 7-7 (ERA design manual)
Or, by using the formula we obtain the critical depth as follows:
dc=0.467*(QB)2/3
=0.467*(16.53) 2/3
= 1.46m which is similar to the value obtained from the nomogragh in
previous case. So let us take our dc=1.43, so that
(dc + D)/2 = (1.43 + 2)/2 = 1.71 m
And, ho = max(TW , (dc + D/2)),but our Tw=0.73m from step 8 above
ho = (dc + D)/2 = 1.71 m =>maximum value of the two.
e. Ke = 0.2 from Table 7-2 ERA mannual
f .Determine (H) - use Chart 7-8 (ERA design manual)

Ke scale = 0.2

culvert length (L) = 80 m

n = 0.012 same as on chart


119

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

area = 6.0m2

H = 0.67m (from nomogragh 7-8)

2010

g. HWoi = H + ho - SoL = .67 + 1.71 - (0.006)80 = 1.9 m


HWoi is less than 1.2D, but control is inlet control, outlet control
computations are for comparison only
Step 9 Determine Controlling Headwater (HWc)

HWc = HWi = 2.4 m > HWoi = 1.9

The culvert is in inlet control

Step 10 Compute Discharge over the Roadway (Qr)


a. Calculate depth above the roadway:
HWr = HWc Hwov
= 2.4 (1352.9-1348)
= -2.5m (This result shows that there is no any water flowing over the road).In
other word the level of water is 2.5m below the roadway.
Step 11 Compute Total Discharge (Qt)
In our calculation above we have determined the discharge over the road is (Qt=0)
because it has negative value. So the total discharge (Qt) is calculated
As follows:
Qt = Qd + Qr = 16.5 m3/s + 0 = 16.5 m3/s
Step 12 Calculate Outlet Velocity (Vo) and Depth (dn)
Inlet Control
120
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

a. Calculate normal depth (dn):


Where we have used trial error method to calculate the normal depth of the flow in the
culvert
Q = (1/n)A* R2/3 S1/2 ,but A=B*dn,
where A=cross sectional area
B=width of the culvert
R=A/Pw, where A=cross sectional area
R=hydraulic radius of the culvert
Pw=wetted perimeter of the clvert
Pw=B+2dn ,B=3
16.5 m3/s= (1/0.012)(3*dn)[(3*dn)/(3+2dn)]2/3(0.05)0.5
= (3*dn)[3*dn/(3+2dn)]2/3 *(0.05)0.5
=>dn=1.08m as it is shown in the following table in order to convey the total
discharge (Qt=16.5). So our trials and their corresponding results are given in the table
below.

dn

1/n

R^2/3

S^1/2

0.2

83.33

0.60

0.3

0.1

2.2

1.3

0.25

83.33

0.75

0.4

0.1

2.5

1.9

0.3

83.33

0.90

0.4

0.1

2.8

2.5

0.4

83.33

1.20

0.5

0.1

3.2

3.9

121
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

0.50

83.33

1.50

0.5

0.1

3.6

5.4

0.90

83.33

2.70

0.7

0.1

4.8

12.8

1.00

83.33

3.00

0.7

0.1

5.0

14.9

1.05

83.33

3.15

0.7

0.1

5.1

15.9

1.08

83.33

3.24

0.7

0.1

5.1

16.6

1.10

83.33

3.30

0.7

0.1

5.1

17.0

1.15

83.33

3.45

0.8

0.1

5.2

18.1

1.20

83.33

3.60

0.8

0.1

5.3

19.2

1.50

83.33

4.50

0.8

0.1

5.8

25.9

2.00

83.33

6.00

0.9

0.1

6.3

37.7

2.20

83.33

6.60

0.9

0.1

6.5

42.6

2.30

83.33

6.90

0.9

0.1

6.5

45.1

2.50

83.33

7.50

1.0

0.1

6.7

50.1

2.60

83.33

7.80

1.0

0.1

6.7

52.6

3.00

83.33

9.00

1.0

0.1

7.0

62.7

Table 3-7 Discharge trial


From the table above we determined our dn =1.08m.
A = (3)*1.08 = 3.24 m2
Vo = Q/A = 16.5/3.24
= 5.093 m/s >2.5*1.99m/s (down stream velocity).So energy dissipater is required to
the damage of adjacent structure and to protect scouring outlet of culvert.
Step 13 Review Results
This step is the step of comparison of alternative design with constraints and
assumptions, if any of the following are exceeded we repeat, Steps 5 through 12 in order
to have a convenient and safe design.

barrel has:
122

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

((1352.9-1346.2) m-2.4m) = 2.5m of cover

L = 80m is OK, since inlet control

headwalls and wing walls fit site

allowable headwater (4.9 m) > 2.5 m is ok and

overtopping flood frequency > 25-year


So the design is ok!

3.3.4 Structural Design of Culvert


The following principles are specific to structural design of culverts:

All culverts shall be hydraulically designed.

Overtopping flood selected is generally consistent with the class of highway and the
risk at the site

Culvert location in both plan and profile shall be investigated to avoid sediment
build-up in culvert barrels.

Material selection shall include consideration of materials availability, and the service
life including abrasion and corrosion potentials.

Design Criteria
Listed below by categories are the design criteria that should be considered for all culvert
designs. The type of drainage structure specified for a particular location is often
determined based on economic considerations; Culverts can be concrete box culverts,
reinforced concrete pipe culverts, or corrugated metal culverts; Concrete box culverts are
constructed with a square or rectangular opening, and with wing walls at both ends.
Design Computation
In this project we propose four culverts and one bridge based on the topography and the
flow direction.
123
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Culvert 1 is at station =12+592.31m


Culvert 2 is at station =13+043.45m
Culvert 3 is at station =13+803.30m
Culvert 4 is at station =15+471.12m
Bridge 1 is at station =14+089m
For design purpose we took culvert number 4 at station15+471.12m as a sample for the
hydraulics and structural design of the culvert. We choose box culvert for our design
since it is easy to construction, to prevent scouring and settlement due to the soil type of
that area.

Fig 3-3 station of culvert 4


Structural design of box culvert
124
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Design data
Geometric data
Internal dimension=h=2
W=3m (From the hydraulics)
Height of fill above the culvert=4.6m (from the profile)
Thickness of the slab=300mm (thickness is normally taken
as 1/10th to 1/15th of

the span)

External dimensions =h=2.3m and w=3.3m


Road width=6.7m
Span=3.3m
Concrete: take C25
Reinforcement
Take steel: S460
Geotechnical data
Unit weight of the soil =18kN/m3 (assumed)
Angle of repose of the soil, =300 (assumed)
Design type

A live load of design truck.

Dead load, live load with water pressure from inside.

Design procedure
1/ Load
125
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Dead load= (1*4.6) m*18kN/m3


=82.8KN/m2
2/ Tire contact area calculation:Contact area =L*w
Where w=500mm
L=2.28*10-3**(1+IM/100)*p
Where =load factor for the limit state under consideration
=1.75(ERA, table 3-2)
IM= dynamic load allowance percent
=33% for other limit state
P=72.5KN for design truck
There fore, L= 2.28*10-3*1.75*(1+.33/100)*72.5 =290mm.

Fig 3-4 wheel load distribution


Distribution of wheel load:For height of fill > 0.6m
126
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

L=L+1.15hf
W=w+1.15hf (ERA section 3.8.6)
There fore, L=0.29+1.15*4.6 =5.58m
W=0.50+1.15*4.6 = 5.79m
But L is greater than the span of the culvert. There fore the intensity of the live loading
needs to be reduced proportionally.
Reduced load= (72.5*3.6)/5.58 =46.77KN
Load with impact factor=1.25*46.77 =58.47KN
Intensity of live load on the slab:
Intensity=load/area
=load/ (culvert span*w)
=58.47/ (3.6*5.79)=2.805KN/m2 =2805N/m2
3/ Load and reaction calculation
Dead load of the top slab:=0.3*1*25000=7500N/m2=75KN/m2
Total load on the culvert=Dead load +Live load
=82.8KN/m2+2.805kN/m2=85.605KN/m2=85605N/2
There fore,
Total design load on the top slab=85605N/2+7,500N/m2
=93,105N/m2
Weight of each wall (side wall) =2.3*0.3*25000=17,250N/m
127
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Then, up ward reaction at the base


= [(93,105*3.3) + (2*17250)]/3.3*1
=103,559N/m2

4/ Lateral pressure
Coefficient of active pressure (Ka) =
Ka

1 sin 30 1

1 sin 30 3

Lateral pressure due to dead and live load


=Total vertical load*Ka =85605*1/3 =28535N/m2
Lateral pressure due to the soil at depth of 2.6m:
=Ka**h =1/3*18000*2.6=15600N.m2
There fore,
Lateral intensity at top=28535N/m2
Lateral intensity at the bottom=28535+15600N.m2 =44135N/m2

128
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Fig 3-5 Pressure diagram for live and dead load

Fig3-5 Pressure diagram due to water

129
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Fig 3-6 Final pressure diagram of the forces or loadings on the components of the culvert.
6/ Moments and shear force calculation
On account of symmetry, it is enough to consider half the frame AEFD for moment
distribution. As all members are of uniform thickness and have the same dimensions,
their moments of inertia are equal.
Relative stiffness of members is:
KAD=1
KAE=KDF=1/2
Distribution factors are:

D AD DDA

1 3
1
2

D AB DDC

1
2

1
1
2

1
3

Fixed end moments are:


MFAB

wl 2 93105 * 2.6 2

52449 N .m 52.499 KN .m
12
12

MFDC

wl 2 103559 * 3.6 2

111843 .7 N .m 111 .843KN .m


12
12

1 * 2.6 *15574 * 2.6


pl 2 wl 28535 * 2.6 2
MFAD

2
19584.06 N .m 19.584 KN .m
12 15
12
15

1 * 2.6 *15574 * 2.6


pl 2 wl
28535 * 2.6 2
MFDA

2
21338.73N .m 21.338KN .m
12 10
12
10

130
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

Joint member

DF
Fixed E.Mome.(KN.m)
balance

2010

DC DA

AD AB

1/3 2/3

2/3 1/3

111.8 -21.34

19.58 -52.49

-30.15 -60.31
-30.15

balance
carryover
balance

42.04 21.02
21.01
-7. -14.01

carryover

-7.005

balance
carryover
balance

4.67 2.33
2.335
-0.778 -1.557

carryover

-0.778

balance
carryover
balance

0.519 0.259
0.259
-0.86 -0.173

carryover

-0.086

balance
carryover
balance

0.058 0.029
0.029
-0.01 -0.019

carryover

-0.01

balance

0.007 0.003
131

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project


carryover

2010
0.003

balance

-0.001 -0.002

Final end moments(KN.m)

73. -73.

28.85 -28.85

Then the final end moments are:MDC=73.001KN.m;


MDA=-73.77KN.m
MAD=28.83KN.m
MAB=-28.85KN.m
7/ Reactions
For horizontal slab AB, carrying distributed load of 93105N/m2,
Vertical reaction RA=RB is:-,
R A RB

1
* 93105 * 3.6 167589 N
2

For bottom slab DC, carrying distributed load of 103559N/m2,


Vertical reaction RD =RC is:RD RC

1
* 103559 * 3.6 186406.21N
2

For vertical member AD, the horizontal reaction HA at A is found by taking moments
about D. Thus,

132
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

H A * 2.6 28850 73000

2010

28535 * 2.6 *

2.6 44109 28835 * 2.6 * 2.6



0
2
2.6 * 2

H A 29005.6 N
28535 44109
* 2.6 H A
2

94437.2 29055.6
65431.6 N
HD

Fig3-7Shear force and axial forces


Bending moment calculation
Free bending moment at mid point E

93105 * 3.6 2
150830.10 N.m
8

Then, net bending moment at E,(top slab)=150830.10-28850


133
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

=121980.10N.m
Again,
Free bending moment at mid point F (bottom slab) =

103559 * 3.6 2
167765.58 N.m
8

Then, net bending moment at F=167765.58-73000


=94765.58N.m
For vertical member AD, which is simply supported bending moment at mid span, is=
28535 * 2.6 2 44109 28535 * 2.6 2

8
16
30692.12 N.m

Then, net bending moment=


73000 28850
30692.12
2

20232.88 N.m

Components of the culvert

Bending moment at the


center(N.m)

Bending moment at ends(N.m)

Top Slab

121980.10

28850.00

Bottom slab

94765.58

73000.00

Side walls

20232.88

73000.00

Table3-8 Summary of bending moments of the culvert components

134
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Fig3-8 Bending moment for the components of the culvert


Reinforcement
Overall depth=300mm
Cover=50mm
Effective depth=d=300-50=250mm
Fcd= (0.68*fck)/c= (0.68*25)/1.5=11.33MPa
fyd=fyk/1.15=460/1.15=400MPa
Width (b) =1000mm
Top slab
At span/center
Depth checking
d check

M
0.2952 * b * f cd

135
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

121980.10 *1000
190mm
0.2952 *1000 *11.33

d check

There fore, the depth is adequate.


Area of steel (Ast,cal)=

2M
Ast ,cal 1
b * d 2 * f cd

f cd
*b * d
f yd

2 * 121980 * 1000 11.33


Ast ,cal 1
* 1000 * 250
*
1000 * 250 2 * 11.33
400

4641.65mm 2

Spacing(S) =

as * b
As

* 20 4 *1000 67.68mm
2

4641.65

Provide 20mm diameter bars with minimum c/c spacing 250mm.


Support reinforcement

2 * 28850 *1000 11.33


Ast ,cal 1
*1000 * 250
*
1000 * 250 2 *11.33
400

6504.25mm 2

Spacing ( S )

as * b
As

* 20 4 *1000 48.30mm
2

6504.25

Provide 20mm diameter bars with minimum c/c spacing 250mm.


136
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Bottom slab
At span/center
Depth checking=
M
0.2952 * b * f cd

d check

d check

94765.58 *1000
168.33mm
0.2952 *1000 *11 .33

There fore, the depth required is adequate.


Area of steel (Ast,cal)=

f cd
2M
Ast ,cal 1
*b * d
*
b * d 2 * f cd f yd

2 * 94765.58 *1000 11.33


Ast ,cal 1
*1000 * 250
*
1000 * 250 2 *11.33
400

5185.94mm 2

Spacing ( S )

as * b
As

* 20 4 *1000 60.58mm

5185.94

Provide 20mm diameter bars with minimum c/c spacing 250mm.


Support reinforcement

2 * 73000 * 1000 11.33


Ast ,cal 1
* 1000 * 250
*
1000 * 250 2 * 11.33
400

3865.88mm 2

137
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

Spacing ( S )

2010

as * b
As

* 20 4 *1000 81.26mm

3865.88

Provide 20mm diameter bars with minimum c/c spacing 250mm.


Side walls
At span/center
Depth checking=
M
0.2952 * b * f cd

d check

d check

20232.88 *1000
77.78mm
0.2952 *1000 *11 .33

There fore, the depth required is adequate.


Area of steel (Ast,cal)=

f cd
2M
Ast ,cal 1
*b * d
*
2
b * d * f cd f yd

2 * 20232.88 *1000 11.33


Ast ,cal 1
*1000 * 250
*
1000 * 250 2 *11.33
400

5388.48mm 2

Spacing(S) =

as * b
As

* 20 4 *1000 60.58mm
2

5388.48

138
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Provide 20mm diameter bars with minimum c/c spacing 250mm.


Support reinforcement

2 * 73000 * 1000 11.33


Ast ,cal 1
* 1000 * 250
*
1000 * 250 2 * 11.33
400

3865.88mm 2

Spacing ( S )

as * b
As

* 20 4 *1000 81.26mm
2

3865.88

Provide 20mm diameter bars with minimum c/c spacing 250mm.

Section-4. Earth Work and Mass Haul Diagram


4.1 Earth Work
Earth work is conversion of natural ground condition to required sections and grades.
Earth work in high way design includes determination of cuts and fills, location of
borrow, waste sites, the free haul and over haul distance determination.
The careful attentions to limiting earthwork quantities through the preparation of a mass
haul diagram are essential elements in providing the best-combined horizontal, vertical,
and cross-sectional design. This is especially true when the design includes consideration
of the least cost in relation to earth works. Key terms associated with this process, as
listed in definitions, include:
Borrow - material not obtained from roadway excavation but secured by widening cuts,
flattening back slopes, excavating from sources adjacent to the road within the
Right-of-way, or from selected borrow pits as may be noted on the plans.
Waste

- material excavated from roadway cuts but not required for making the
139

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

embankment.
Free Haul - the maximum distance through which excavated material may be transported
without the added cost above the unit bid price.
Overhaul - excavated material transported to a distance beyond the free haul distance.
Economic Limit of Haul - distance through which it is more economical to haul
excavated material than to waste and borrow.
Clearing and garbing (m2) - the removal of top soil, trees, bushes and e.t.c
Excavation (m3) - the process of loosing and removal of soil and rocks. It can be done
for three reasons.
In order to maintain the grades for roads and drainage
For structure foundation
For borrow excavation
Embankment /compaction (m3k.hr) - densification of fill section of the road.
The steps involved in the computation of earthwork quantities and the development of the
optimal mass haul diagram are:

End area calculations


Earthwork calculations
Preparation of mass haul diagram.
Balancing earthworks using the mass haul diagram

Purpose of the preparation of earth work quantities and mass haul diagram

To estimate cost of the (to limit the cost of construction)


For the proper distribution of excavated material
To determine amount and location of waste and borrow.
Amount of over haul in kilometer cubic meter can be determined.
To determine direction of haul.

Computation of earthwork
140
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

There are several ways of calculating earthwork but the most common is the average end
area method. This method consists of averaging the cut and fill quantities of adjacent
stations and multiplying by the distance between stations to produce cubic meters of
excavation and embankment between the two stations.
End Area Calculations
In this project we took 25 cross section that covers total distance of 500 m (from station
12 + 500 to 13+000 m)
Calculation procedure followed
Area at different cross section along the road with an interval of 20m station
is taken.
Read the elevations of existing profile along the right of way (50 m) from the
contour to plot the points.
Design proposed carriage way by providing a cross fall of 2.5% from the
center to both direction. Then the amount of cut and fill are determined at
each 20m stations (to calculate the end area areas we use AutoCAD software
program)
Preparation of mass haul diagram.
Volume calculation
The volume of earth work from the successive cross sections can be computed by
different formulas like average end area method, (trapezoidal method) or primordial
formula.
Average end Area Method (trapezoidal method)
A1 A2
*L
2

V=
Where :

V= volume in m3
141
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

A1and A2 is area of successive cross-section in m2


L= distance between successive cross section in m in this case 20 m.
The average end area method is simple and is generally preferred, so we choose this
method for this particular project.
The volume computed by this formula is likely to be higher than the true value in the case
of the section changing rapidly.
Estimation of earth work quantities
Based on:o Estimate of quantities
o Rate of abstract of work
Shrinkage and swelling should be included in estimating the quantities. According to
ERA 2001 there is a recommended shrinkage and swelling factor there fore the following
tables show the recommended values of Shrinkage factors

Type of soil

Shrinkage factor

Light soil (ordinary ground)

10-25%

Light soil(swamp ground)

20-40%

Heavy soil

up to10%

Table 4-1 Soil shrinkage factor


4.2 Mass haul diagram
It is a graphical representation of the amount of earth work and embankment involved in
a project and the manner in which the earth is to be moved.
The mass haul diagram shows excavation (adjusted) and embankment quantities from
some point of beginning on the profile, considering cut volumes positive and fill volumes
142
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

negative. At the beginning of the curve the ordinate is zero, and ordinates are calculated
continuously from the initial station to the end of the project.
Mass haul diagram is a continuous curve showing the accumulated algebraic sum of the
cut (+ve) and fill (-ve) volume from some initial station for any succeeding section. The
horizontal axis represents distance and is usually expressed in meters or stations. The
vertical axis represents the cumulative quantity of earth work in cubic meter (m3).
The mass haul diagram allows determining direction of haul and the quantity of earth
taken from or hauled to any location. It shows balance point the station between which is
the volume of excavation. In this project horizontal axis represents stations from 12+500
to 13+000 and the vertical axis represents the cumulative volume.
Use of mass haul diagram
The mass haul diagram can be used to determine:

Proper distribution of excavated material


Amount and location of waste
Amount and location of borrow
Amount of overhaul in kilometer-cubic meters
Direction of haul.
In proportion and enabling suitable plant, equipment or machinery.

For our project the mass haul diagram is drawn according to the following data. We use
swelling factor of 0 % and factor shrinkage 85 % because we assume the soil is ordinary
common soil so we consider only swelling.
Calculation of mass ordinates is performed and the results are shown below on the table.

143
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

End Area(m2)
Station

cut

Fill

12+500

15.64

48.35

12+520

11.95

81.06

12+540

2.98

12+560

2010

Dist
ance(m)

Tot.Adj.cut vol.

fill vol.

Mass
ordinet(m3)

Adj.factor

Adj.cut

0.85

13.29

20

0.85

10.16

234.49

1294.05

-1059.56

89.72

20

0.85

2.53

126.91

1707.81

-2640.46

0.00

125.60

20

0.85

0.00

25.34

2153.18

-4768.30

12+580

0.00

115.74

20

0.85

0.00

0.00

2413.38

-7181.68

12+600

0.24

79.78

20

0.85

0.21

2.08

1955.22

-9134.82

12+620

9.06

36.18

20

0.85

7.70

79.13

1159.64

-10215.34

12+640

2.35

43.15

20

0.85

2.00

97.05

793.37

-10911.67

12+660

60.34

0.86

20

0.85

51.29

532.86

440.18

-10818.99

12+680

95.33

0.00

20

0.85

81.03

1323.19

8.64

-9504.44

12+700

115.38

0.87

20

0.85

98.07

1791.02

8.74

-7722.15

12+720

123.29

6.48

20

0.85

104.80

2028.70

73.58

-5767.03

12+740

111.28

19.05

20

0.85

94.59

1993.91

255.35

-4028.47

12+760

108.40

29.66

20

0.85

92.14

1867.26

487.10

-2648.32

12+780

107.95

45.24

20

0.85

91.76

1838.95

748.97

-1558.34

0.00

144
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

12+800

151.88

50.51

20

0.85

129.10

2208.56

957.43

-307.21

12+820

99.01

76.88

20

0.85

84.16

2132.54

1273.84

551.49

12+840

104.34

78.86

20

0.85

88.69

1728.42

1557.42

722.49

12+860

95.42

82.83

20

0.85

81.11

1697.94

1616.97

803.47

12+880

82.88

101.51

20

0.85

70.45

1515.58

1843.46

475.59

12+900

72.19

101.21

20

0.85

61.36

1318.07

2027.19

-233.53

12+920

77.90

111.42

20

0.85

66.22

1275.74

2126.26

-1084.05

12+940

72.59

125.25

20

0.85

61.70

1279.14

2366.72

-2171.63

12+960

60.88

128.38

20

0.85

51.75

1134.47

2536.32

-3573.48

12+980

51.63

152.34

20

0.85

43.89

956.37

2807.19

-5424.30

13+000

49.85

165.54

20

0.85

42.37

862.60

3178.82

-7740.53

Table 4-2 mass ordinate

Fig.4-1 Mass haul diagram


The direction of haul:
From station 12+640 to 12+740 to the left.
From station 12+740 to 12+860 to the right.
145
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Economical Over Haul Distance


When costing the Earth moving, there are basic costs which are usually included in the
contracts for the project.
Cost of free haul :- any earth moved over distances not greater than the free haul
distance is cost only on the excavation of its volume.
Cost of over haul: - any earth moved over distances greater than the free haul distance is
charged both for its volume and for the distance in excess of the free haul distance over
which it is moved. This charge can be specified either for units of haul or for units of
volume.
Cost of waste: - any surplus or unsuitable material which must be removed from the site
and deposited in a tip is usually charged on units of volume. This charge can vary from
one section of the site to another depending on the nearness of tips.
Cost of borrow: - any extra material which must be brought on to the site to make up the
deficiency is also usually charged on units of volume.
This charge can also vary from one section of the site to another depending on the
nearness of borrow pits.
ELH = FH distance + (Unit Price of Borrow/ Unit Price of Overhaul)
Where: ELH = Economic limit of haul
FH = Free haul distance
Assume that
Ec = cost of excavation per unit volume(m3)
Hard excavation to embankment = 273 birr/m3
Excavation an unsuitable = 62 birr/m3
Bc = cost of borrow per cubic meter per station = 15 birr/m3
OHc = cost of over hauling per unit volume-station = 12 birr /m3
FH = Free haul distance = 120m (6 station)
ELH = FH + (Bc / OHc)
146
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

= 120/20 + 15/12 = 7.25 station or 145 m


Therefore the economic haul distance is 145 m.
Total free haul volume = VD + FW
= 3500 +1500 =5000 m3 from mass haul diagram
Total borrow =AB + LH = 4000 +7800 = 11800m3
Cost of earth work = cost of borrow +cost of excavation + cost of over haul
Cost of borrow = Total volume of borrow *cost of borrow per meter cubic
=11800m3*15 birr/100m3 = 1770 birr
Cost of excavation = volume of excavation * cost of excavation per meter cubic
Volume of excavation = DJ + FI = 7000 +4900 = 11900m3
Cost of excavation = 11900*273 birr/100m3 =32,487 birr
Cost of over haul = over haul volume *cost of over haul per station meter.
For loop 1
Over haul volume 1 = area CJM + area UEO
= 43,750 + 70,000 = 113750 m3
For loop 2
Over haul volume 2 = area ESP+ area QRG
= 96,250 + 87,500 = 183,750 m3
Total Over haul volume = 113750 + 183,750 = 297,500 m3
Cost of over haul = 297,500 m3 *12 birr/100m3
= 35,700 birr.
147
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Total cost of earth work = cost of borrow +cost of excavation + cost of over haul
= 1770 birr + 32,487 birr + 35,700 birr.
= 69,957 birr

Section-5:

Pavement design

Pavement design is the process of developing the most economical combination of


pavement layers (thickness, type) to suit the soil foundation and withstand the load due to
cumulative traffic during the design life or period.
The design standard described here presents the pavement design standard which will be
utilized in the course of the design works all in accordance with ERA Pavement Design
manuals and other internationally recognized Pavement Design Standards. The main
design parameters for the pavement design include:
Estimating the amount of traffic
Assessing and evaluating the strength of sub grade soil
Locally available construction materials
Drainage Conditions
Environment factors
In this standard, traffic volume, Sub grade type, construction materials and local factors
are the main design inputs.
The traffic volume will be determined from the traffic counts in terms of AADT
(Average Annual Daily traffic) we take this value from the given data. We determine the
Sub grade type and strength from the given CBR % (California Bearing Ratio) Values.
The basic idea in building a pavement for all-weather use by vehicles is to prepare a
suitable Sub grade, provide necessary drainage and construct a pavement that will:
148
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Have sufficient total thickness and internal strength to carry expected traffic
loads;
Have adequate properties to prevent or minimize the penetration or internal
accumulation of moisture, and
Have a surface that is reasonably smooth and skid resistant at the same time, as
well as reasonably resistant to wear, distortion and deterioration by weather.
The sub grade ultimately carries all traffic loads.
The basic idea in building a pavement for all weather use by vehicles is:

To prepare a suitable sub grade

Provide necessary drainage and

Construct a pavement that will have sufficient total thickness and internal strength
to carry expected traffic loads, and distribute them over the sub grade soil without
overstressing.

Design inputs
In this pavement design, the design inputs are summarized into two main parameters,
traffic load in terms of cumulative ESA and Subgrade strength interim of CBR. The
overall required strength is read from charts or graphs which preset pavement catalogues
in which each pavement composition is classified based on ranges of traffic loading (T 1T8) and Subgrade strength (S1-S6) maximum CBR value. Therefore we provide flexible
pavement for our road project.
Flexible pavements
Flexible pavements are intended to limit the stress created at the sub grade level by the
traffic traveling on the pavement surface, so that the sub grade is not subject to significant
deformations. In effect, the concentrated loads of the vehicle wheels are spread over a
sufficiently larger area at sub grade level.

149
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

A flexible pavement is one, which has low (bending) flexural strength, and the load is
largely transmitted to the sub grade soil through the lateral distribution of stresses with
increasing depth.
The pavement thickness is designed such that the stresses on the sub grade soil are kept
with in its bearing capacity and the sub grade is prevented from excessive deformation.
The strength and smoothness of flexible pavement structure depends to a large extent on
the deformation of the sub grade soil.
A flexible pavement must satisfy a number of structural criteria or considerations;
The sub grade should be able to sustain traffic loading without excessive
deformation; this is controlled by the vertical compressive stress or strain at this
level.
Bituminous materials and cement-bound materials used in road base design
should not crack under the influence of traffic; this is controlled by the horizontal
tensile stress or strain at the bottom of the road base.
The road base is often considered the main structural layer of the pavement,
required to distribute the applied traffic loading so that the underlying materials
are not over stressed. It must be able to sustain the stress and strain generated
within it with out excessive or rapid deterioration of any kind.
In pavements containing a considerable thickness of bituminous materials, the
internal deformation of these materials must be limited; their deformation is a
function of their creep characteristics.
The load spreading ability of granular sub base and capping layers must be
adequate to provide a satisfactory construction platform.
Elements of the conventional flexible pavement
Tack coat

150
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Is a very light application of asphalt usually asphalt emulsion diluted with water
used to ensure the bond between the surface being paved (surface course) and the
overlying course.
Essential requirements of tack coat
It must be very thin.
It must uniformly cover the entire surface to be paved.
It must be allowed to break or cure before the HMA is laid.
Prime coat
Is an application of low viscosity cut-back asphalt to an absorbent surface, such as
un treated granular base on which an asphalt layer will be placed.
Its purpose is to bind granular base to the asphalt layer.
The prime coat penetrates the underlying layer, plugs the voids, and forms water
tight surface.
Surface course
The surface course is the top course of an asphalt pavement, sometimes called the
wearing course
It is usually constructed by dense graded hot-mix asphalt
It must be:

Tough to resist distortion under traffic and provide a smooth and skid-resistant
riding surface.

Waterproof to protect the entire pavement and sub grade from the weakening
effect of water.

Binder course
Sometimes called the asphalt base course is the asphalt layer below the surface
course.
It is placed for two reasons:

First, the HMA is too thick to be compacted one layer, so it must be placed in two
layer.
151

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Second the binder course generally consists of larger aggregates and less asphalt
and does not require a high quality as the surface so replacing a part of the

surface course by the binder course results in a more economical design.


Base course
The base course is the layer of material immediately beneath the surface course.
It may be composed of well graded crushed stone (unbounded), granular material
mixed with binder, or stabilized materials. It is the main structural part of the
pavement and provides a level surface for laying the surface layer.
Sub base course
Construct using local and cheaper materials for economic reason on top of the
sub grade. It provides additional help to the base and the upper layers in
distributing the load. It facilitates drainage of free water that might get
accumulated below the pavement.
Sub grade
It is the foundation on which the vehicle load and the weight of the pavement
layers finally rest. It is an in situ or a layer of selected materials compacted to the
desirable density near the optimum moisture content.

152
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Fig 5-1 Road layer


The basic key elements for designing of pavements are:

Traffic class

Sub grade strength

5.1 Traffic volume analysis


Traffic classes are depends on ESAs & vehicle classification;
Where ESAs are based on:
Vehicle classification
Cumulative traffic volume ( T )
Equivalency factor (EF)
Vehicle classification from the give data
Passenger vehicles

Freight vehicles

Cars

Small trucks

4WD

Medium trucks

Small bus

Heavy trucks

Large bus

Articulated trucks

Cumulative traffic volume ( T )


T = AADT1*(p)*(D)*365((1+i)N -1)/i
Where, AADT1 traffic volume when the road is open (2013)
i

N =

growth rate

= 7 %, it is given

design period

= 15, it is given

P = lane distribution factor

=1 (100%) ERA/AASHTO
153

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

D = directional distribution factor = 0.5 this accounts for any


directional variation in total traffic volume or loading pattern.
Equivalency factor (EF)
EF= (Axle i/8160)n
Where, n is usually 4.5
Axles i = load in kg
The Cumulative number of vehicles are depends on AADT (2013) & Diverted
traffic (2013), then we use the sum of both traffic volume.
To calculate equivalent standard axles (ESAs) by using, Cumulative number of
vehicle (T) and Equivalency factor (EF).

5.2 Axle load survey and equivalent factor computation


From the axle load survey data of each vehicle, the equivalent factor is computed and
summarized in the following table. Refer to annex for the detail computation.

Day 13
Classificatio
n of vehicles

NO.

Day 14
EF

NO.

Day 15
EF

NO.

Day 16
EF

NO.

Day 17
EF

NO.

Day 18
EF

NO.

T0TAL
EF

NO.

EF

EF

car

0.00

4 WD

0.00

S/Bus

10

0.3

10

0.31

10

0.54

10

0.54

10

0.44

10

0.75

60

2.87

0.05

L/Bus

10

8.3

10

8.89

10

3.89

10

10

10

8.90

10

10.9

60

50.86

0.85

S/Truck

0.0

0.02

0.00

M/Truck

10

0.3

10

0.91

10

0.09

10

3.86

10

6.02

10

0.16

60

11.28

0.19

L/Truck

10

83.3

10

55.5

10

46.7

10

49.8

10

91.40

10

58.4

60

385.02

6.42

T/Trailer

10

192.6

10

165

10

117

10

145

10

145.5

10

112

60

878.39

14.64

154
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

5.3 Traffic class determination


Calculation of ESAs by using the above Axle load survey
EF= (Axle i/8160)^4.5 T = AADT1*(p)*(D)*365((1+i)N -1)/i
i= 7% P= 1 D= 0.5

Day 13

Day 14

Day 15

Day 16

Day 17

Day 18

T0TAL
EF

AADT1

Cumula.
No.
Veh.

car

0.00

0.00

4 WD

0.00

21

96307

0.00

Classification
of vehicles

NO.

EF

NO.

EF

NO.

EF

NO.

EF

NO.

EF

NO.

EF

NO.

EF

ESAs
(10^6)

S/Bus

10

0.3

10

0.31

10

0.54

10

0.54

10

0.44

10

0.75

60

2.87

0.05

18

82549

0.00

L/Bus

10

8.3

10

8.89

10

3.89

10

10

10

8.90

10

10.9

60

50.86

0.85

32102

0.03

S/Truck

0.0

0.02

0.00

38

174270

0.00

M/Truck

10

0.3

10

0.91

10

0.09

10

3.86

10

6.02

10

0.16

60

11.28

0.19

31

142167

0.03

L/Truck

10

83.3

10

55.5

10

46.7

10

49.8

10

91.40

10

58.4

60

385.02

6.42

51

233888

1.50

T/Trailer

10

192.6

10

165

10

117

10

145

10

145.5

10

112

60

878.39

14.64

38

174270

2.55

Sum

4.11

Table 5-1 ESAs computation


ESAs = 4.11*10^6
Based on this traffic analysis the main access belongs to the traffic class T5 which is in the
range of (3 to 6)*10^6 ESAs.
CBR test from the given data is 4% from 0 km to 24km and our road project is between
12.5 km to 15.5 km. According to ERA 2002 design manual CBR test (3-4) % fails in to
the soil class sub grade strength S2 .Therefore our road project design is based on traffic
class T5 and sub grade strength S2.

5.4 Selection of economical section


155
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

By using T5 and S2 the economical pavement selected from the catalog of pavement types
and configuration for design of road section. Chart (1, 2, 3, 4, 7 and 8) selected for
comparison purpose.

Materials

abbreviation

pric(m3)inbi
rr

Double surface dressing

DSD

1000

Flexible bituminous surface

FBS

2050

Bituminous surface

BS

900

Bituminous road base, RB

BRB

1045

Granular road base, GB1-GB3

GRB(1-3)

560

Granular sub base GS

GSB

250

Granular capping layer, or selected sub grade fill, GC

GCL or SSF

200

Cement or lime stabilized road base1, CS1

C or LSRB1

Cement or lime stabilized road base2, CS2

C or LSRB2

810

Cement or lime stabilized sub base, CS

C or LSSB

860

Table 5-2 Material and price

Chart 1

Chart 2
SD

SD

156
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

Chart 3

2010

Chart 4

Chart 7

Chart 8

SD

157
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

158
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Price

Price (Birr )

chart8

Birr/m3

chart1

chart2

50

1000

50

50

THICKNESS OF THE CHARTS (mm)


Materials

chart1

chart2

DSD

50

50

FBS

chart3

50

chart4

50

BRB
GRB(1-3)

200

GSB

275

GCLorSSF

200

CorLSRB2

150

175

200

250

CorLSSB

50

2050

125

1045

150

275
200

chart7

200
225

200

chart7

chart8

102.5

102.5
130.63

112

250

68.75

225

200

40

200

810

225

860

Total

chart4

50
102.5

560
225

chart3

84

98

84

68.75
40

40

202.5

56.25
40

40

182.25

45
162
193.5

270.75

376.5

309.25

408.75

329.38

400.5

Table 5-3 Economical section

159
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

From the above charts, chart 1 is more economical than others but it is not technically
feasible, because mostly it is used for maintenance purpose. Therefore, we choose chart 3
with bituminous surface (HMA). The thickness of each layer summarized as follows:
Materials
Station(km)

12 +500- 15+ 500

Layer
thickness(mm)

FBS

50

GRB(1-3)

175

GSB

275

GCL or SSF

200

Table 5-4 selected section

Section-6: Provision of traffic controls


Signings and Markings
They are directly related to the design of the highway or street and futures of traffic
controls and operation that the designer should consider in the geometric layout of such
facilities. The potential for future operational problems can be significantly reduced if
signing and marking are treated as an integral part of the highway design.
The extent to which signs and markings are used depends on the traffic volume, type of
facility and the extent of traffic control appropriate for save and efficient operation.
Generally highway signs are three types as per AASHTO practice

Regulatory signs: to indicate the rules for traffic movement (prohibitory and
mandatory).
Mandatory signs for stop and yielding.
Prohibitory signs for curve movements, weight and speed limitation etc

160
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Warning or danger or cautionary signs: to indicate conditions that may involve


risk to highway users.

Guide or information signs: to direct traffic along a route or towards a distention.

Physical obstructions in or near our road way project should be removed in order to
provide the appropriate clear zone. Where removal is impossible, such objects should be
adequately marked by painting or by use of other highly visible material.
Where the object is in the direct line of traffic, the obstruction and marking there on
preferably should be illuminated at night by flood lighting; where there is not practical,
the object markings should be effectively reflectorized.
Post mounted delineators are another type of marking devises used to guide traffic,
particularly at night. Reflector units are installed at certain height & spacing to delineate
the road way where alignment changes may be confusing & not clearly defined.
The importance of traffic control devices

Give timely warning of hazardous situation when they are not self evident

Regulating traffic by imparting messages to the drivers about the need to


stop, give way or yielding & limit their speed

Give information as to highway routes, directions & point of intersection.

The general guide lines for the provision of traffic signings

It should be installed only by the authority of law with proper enforcement


measures to respecting the signs.

It should be provided only after traffic engineering studies & sound judgments.

Excessive use of signs should not be resorted to.

They should be legible & understood to those who using it (visibility, lettering,
symbols, locations, simplicity, uniformity & standard size).
Location, height & maintenance of traffic signs

The location, reflecting & lighting of signs are important considerations.


161
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

The signs should be located on the risk side of the road where the drivers will be looking
at them. On hill roads, they should be fixed on the valley side of the road & mounted on
the posts. According to AASHTO practice the signs in rural areas shall be mounted at a
height of at least 1.5m measured from the bottom to the pavement.
The sign posts should be maintained in proper position & legible at all time. Damaged
signs should be replaced immediately. Periodic painting of signs should be a routine part
of maintenance.
Road markings provisions
These markings are used as a means of controlling & guiding traffic of roads & safety.
These are:

Carriage way marking-which includes center line strip, traffic line strip, no over
taking zone, stop lines , pedestrian &cyclist crossings , route directions etc.

Object markings-which should contains Krebs markings, culvert head wall


markings, & other objects adjacent to the carriage way.

The general guide lines of longitudinal pavement markings

Solid lines are restrictive & cannot be crossed.

Broken lines are restrictive in character & vehicle can cross it safely.

Double lines indicate maximum restrictions.

When combination of solid & broken lines are used, and the traffic moves to the
right(left), a vehicle should not cross the continuous line adjacent to the
right(left) of broken lines on the lane which the vehicle moving.

Pavement marking colors shall be white (optional crossing) & yellow (not
crossing).

On rural areas the center line marking of the pavement segment & gaps shall be doubled
in length than an urban location, due to less traffic congestions. In addition the length of
gaps shall be shorter near approaches, intersections & on curves than on straight reaches.
The gap shall be half the value on straight sections.
162
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Traffic lane lines


The division of the carriage way in to separate lanes for traffic traveling in the same
directions on either side of the center line or median strip helps to promote travel in
proper lanes by promoting safety & ensuring maximum capacity.
No overtaking zone marking
These markings shall be provided on summit curves, horizontal curves & tangents in two
or three lane highways where overtaking & passing maneuvers must be prohibited,
because of non availability of safe overtaking sight distance or other hazardous
conditions. The marking for No overtaking zone consists of a combination lines along
the center line. The combination lines consist of a double line, the left hand element of
which shall be a solid barrier line & the right hand element also either a normal broken
center line or solid barrier governing the traffic from the opposite direction. Where a olid
barrier line is to the right of the broken line, the overtaking restriction shall apply only to
the opposing the traffic. If both lines are solid lines, No overtaking is permitted in both
directions.

163
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Fig 6-1. For areas on which No overtaking is permitted in both directions.

Fig.6-2 a normal broken center line for areas on which passing is permitted safely in both
directions.

164
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Fig.6.3 solid barrier line & the right hand element broken center line for areas on which
a solid barrier line is to the right of the broken line, the overtaking restriction in one
direction
Pavement edge lines or strips
These shall be used to indicate the edges of carriageway on which no Krebs are provided.
They serve as a visual guidance for the drivers, indicating to them the limits up to which
the driver can safely venture. They especially are useful during adverse weather & poor
visibility. Where the paved shoulder is of a lesser structural strength than the main
pavement, the edge lines are used to promote travel on the main pavement itself.
Edge lines shall be in the form of single continuous lines placed about 15cm from the
edge & the width of the lines shall be 15-20cm. Based on the above guide lines &
principles as per AASHTO & ERA manuals we recommended that:

On the crest curve, from station (PC)=13+472 to (PT) =


13+672 overtaking is not permitted hence the solid barrier
marking lines along with center line must be provided. In
addition to this post mounted traffic signs that show ascent or
descent summit curve must be provided on the risk side of
the road.

On

horizontal

curves,

from

PC=12+655.43

to

PT=12+774.55, from PC=13+098.59 to PT=13+199.38,


PC=13+263.38 to PT=13+445.38, from PC=13+806.5 to
PT=14+180.50, from PC=14+685.72 to 14+820.57, and from
PC= 15+175.76 to PT=15+274.96 , here also overtaking is
not permitted therefore the solid barrier marking lines along
with center line must be provided. And post mounted traffic
signs that show speed limitation, to the right hand & to the
165
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

left hand horizontal curve sign must be provided on the risk


side of the road & visible to the traffic.

On the tangent curve, from station (PT) = 12+774.55 to


station (PC) =13+098.59, similar manner as to horizontal
curves.

Section-7: Environmental consideration


Environmental assessment: the identification and evaluation of the likely effects of a
proposed policy, program, or project on the environment; alternatives to the proposal;
measures to be adopted to protect the environment; a standard tool for decision making.
Environmental Issues Include

Noise from all types of equipment and traffic

Air quality / emissions and dust problems from all types of equipment and traffic

Impact on natural and planted vegetation: removal or trimming of only those plants
and trees directly affected by the implementation of the Project will be permitted.

Provisions for pedestrians and non-motorized traffic.

Access to properties /access to the site

Soil stability and earthworks

Effect on watercourses and water quality

Effects on adjacent land.

Material disposal

Equipment operation and disposal

Disposal of waste and reinstatement of land

Therefore the above factors will considered during construction of this project.
Erosion
When natural conditions are modified by the construction of a road, it marks the start of a
race between the appearance of erosion and the growth of vegetation. Disturbance during
construction can upset the often delicate balance between stabilizing factors, such as
166
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

vegetation, and others which seek to destabilize, such as running water. In some cases
erosion might result in cumulative impacts far beyond the road itself, affecting slopes,
streams, rivers, and dams at some distance from the initial impact.
Side-tipping of spoil materials
Spoil material from road cuttings can kill vegetation and add to erosion and slope
stability problems. Large amounts of spoil can be generated during construction in
mountainous terrain. Sometimes it is difficult to design for balances between cut and fill
volumes of earth at each location, and haulage to disposal sites may be expensive. This
creates a need for environmental management of tipped material.
During construction we shall not interrupt or interfere with the flow of irrigation waters
without making prior arrangements with and obtaining the agreement of the irrigation
authorities. The contractor shall allow in his program for the construction of those works
which might interface with the flow of irrigation waters to be carried out at such times as
will cause the least disturbance to irrigation operations.
The contractor shall comply with the following: Meet the requirements of regulations.
Consult, with the engineer before locating and constructing project offices and sheds and
installing construction plant. Prevent pollution of any kind to adjacent property resulting
from the construction operation. Sites containing cement, line and similar items shall be
suitably protected from rain and flood. Natural streams or channels adjacent to the works
of this contract shall not be disturbed without the approval of the engineer.
Management of Waste Materials
Management of waste materials: all excavated material to be disposed off-site in
locations approved by the local regulatory agency. No material is to be disposed down
slope without specific approval of the site engineer, and will be approved only if existing
drainage, agricultural land, housing, and slope stability is not affected. All waste oils to
be disposed of in accordance with existing environmental regulations.
Remedial Measures
167
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Prevention
When planning new roads or changes in width or alignment, sensitive natural
environments should be identified early in the planning process so that alternate routes
and designs may be considered. Wherever possible, road developments should be located
more than one kilometer away from sensitive areas to avoid severe impacts on flora and
fauna. Water crossings should be minimized, and buffer zones of undisturbed vegetation
should be left between roads and after courses. Groundwater recharge areas should be
avoided, and major roads should not be constructed through national parks or other
protected areas. Advantage should be taken of opportunities to twin new road corridors
with previously established transport rights-of-way, such as railway lines.
Animal crossings
As we know Somale region has a lot of camel and goat and other wild animal .Animal
crossings can be used to assist the migration of these animals. At important crossing
points, animal tunnels or bridges have sometimes been used to reduce collision rates,
especially for protected or endangered species. Tunnels are sometimes combined with
culverts or other hydraulic structures. These measures are expensive and used only at a
few locations where they are both justified (by the importance of the animal population
and the crossing route) and affordable (relative to the cost of the project and the funds
available.

168
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Annexes
Annexe-1 terrain classification data
station

Elv.diff.(m)

H.distance(m)

Slope (%)

Terrain
classification

12+500

10

64.62

15.48

Rolling

12+520

12

49.09

24.44

Rolling

12+540

12

44.14

27.19

Mountainous

12+560

16

72.95

21.93

Rolling

12+580

16

61.61

25.97

Mountainous

12+600

20

88.62

22.57

Rolling

12+620

22

104.2

21.11

Rolling

12+640

24

109.36

21.95

Rolling

12+660

24

94.49

25.40

Mountainous

12+680

24

96.69

24.82

Rolling

12+700

26

109.72

23.70

Rolling

Remarks

169
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

12+720

26

115.4

22.53

Rolling

12+740

26

111.19

23.38

Rolling

12+760

26

106.85

24.33

Rolling

12+780

28

106.19

26.37

Mountainous

12+800

30

110.63

27.12

Mountainous

12+820

30

107.58

27.89

Mountainous

12+840

30

108.26

27.71

Mountainous

12+860

28

100.08

27.98

Mountainous

12+880

28

102.46

27.33

Mountainous

12+900

28

107.74

25.99

Mountainous

12+920

26

114.21

22.77

Rolling

12+940

26

95.19

27.31

Mountainous

12+960

24

85.46

28.08

Mountainous

12+980

24

92.68

25.90

Mountainous

13+000

20

76.43

26.17

Mountainous

13+020

22

89.62

24.55

Mountainous

13+040

28

101.46

27.60

Mountainous

13+060

26

92.29

28.17

Mountainous

13+080

26

92.76

28.03

Mountainous

13+100

24

97.52

24.61

Rolling

13+120

26

118.78

21.89

Rolling

13+140

24

104.16

23.04

Rolling

13+160

26

136.26

19.08

Rolling

13+180

26

116.46

22.33

Rolling

13+200

26

104.63

24.85

Rolling

13+220

26

95.84

27.13

Mountainous

13+240

26

103.46

25.13

Mountainous
170

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

13+260

26

98.53

26.39

Mountainous

13+280

24

91.86

26.13

Mountainous

13+300

20

112.18

17.83

Rolling

13+320

99.49

4.02

Rolling

13+340

115.2

6.94

Rolling

13+360

10

126.58

7.90

Rolling

13+380

12

101.27

11.85

Rolling

13+400

12

100.37

11.96

Rolling

13+420

14

105.34

13.29

Rolling

13+440

16

104.77

15.27

Rolling

13+460

18

99.32

18.12

Rolling

13+480

22

112.79

19.51

Rolling

13+500

22

103.12

21.33

Rolling

13+520

24

100.46

23.89

Rolling

13+540

26

102.99

25.25

Mountainous

13+560

26

93.67

27.76

Mountainous

13+580

26

86.25

30.14

Mountainous

13+600

30

98.06

30.59

Mountainous

13+620

30

92.25

32.52

Mountainous

13+640

28

80.12

34.95

Mountainous

13+660

28

75.52

37.08

Mountainous

13+680

28

72.91

38.40

Mountainous

13+700

30

81.44

36.84

Mountainous

13+720

32

98.29

32.56

Mountainous

13+740

32

103.67

30.87

Mountainous

13+760

32

102.5

31.22

Mountainous

13+780

32

104.98

30.48

Mountainous
171

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

13+800

32

93.3

34.30

Mountainous

13+820

32

104.76

30.55

Mountainous

13+840

30

128.59

23.33

Rolling

13+860

30

135.71

22.11

Rolling

13+880

30

145.89

20.56

Rolling

13+900

28

145.95

19.18

Rolling

13+920

28

141.63

19.77

Rolling

13+940

26

152.86

17.01

Rolling

13+960

22

153.32

14.35

Rolling

13+980

20

131.94

15.16

Rolling

14+000

16

115.77

13.82

Rolling

14+020

14

107.45

13.03

Rolling

14+040

12

96.56

12.43

Rolling

14+060

45.36

17.64

Rolling

14+080

30.59

26.15

Mountainous

14+100

41.6

9.62

Rolling

14+120

24.73

16.17

Rolling

14+140

42.08

19.01

Rolling

14+160

54.93

14.56

Rolling

14+180

58.2

13.75

Rolling

14+200

10

76.44

13.08

Rolling

14+220

10

67.47

14.82

Rolling

14+240

12

69.23

17.33

Rolling

14+260

12

62.82

19.10

Rolling

14+280

12

63.81

18.81

Rolling

14+300

14

72.11

19.41

Rolling

14+320

14

71.83

19.49

Rolling
172

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

14+340

14

70.36

19.90

Rolling

14+360

14

72.4

19.34

Rolling

14+380

12

65.94

18.20

Rolling

14+400

12

66.38

18.08

Rolling

14+420

12

65.11

18.43

Rolling

14+440

12

64.56

18.59

Rolling

14+460

12

64.36

18.65

Rolling

14+480

12

66.09

18.16

Rolling

14+500

12

65.26

18.39

Rolling

14+520

12

65.94

18.20

Rolling

14+540

12

68.3

17.57

Rolling

14+560

12

67.52

17.77

Rolling

14+580

12

68.97

17.40

Rolling

14+600

12

69

17.39

Rolling

14+620

12

62.41

19.23

Rolling

14+640

12

61.49

19.52

Rolling

14+660

12

61.43

19.53

Rolling

14+680

12

60.15

19.95

Rolling

14+700

12

58.29

20.59

Rolling

14+720

14

83.74

16.72

Rolling

14+740

14

85.15

16.44

Rolling

14+760

14

101.46

13.80

Rolling

14+780

12

90.01

13.33

Rolling

14+800

12

95.51

12.56

Rolling

14+820

14

110.72

12.64

Rolling

14+840

14

108.07

12.95

Rolling

14+860

14

105.75

13.24

Rolling
173

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

14+880

14

103.65

13.51

Rolling

14+900

14

100.27

13.96

Rolling

14+920

14

94.31

14.84

Rolling

14+940

14

87.69

15.97

Rolling

14+960

14

81.65

17.15

Rolling

14+980

14

79.81

17.54

Rolling

15+000

16

96.04

16.66

Rolling

15+020

16

93.13

17.18

Rolling

15+040

16

88

18.18

Rolling

15+060

16

85.64

18.68

Rolling

15+080

16

83.05

19.27

Rolling

15+100

16

78.25

20.45

Rolling

15+120

16

76.14

21.01

Rolling

15+140

16

74.54

21.46

Rolling

15+160

16

73.3

21.83

Rolling

15+180

16

71.11

22.50

Rolling

15+200

16

62.19

25.73

Mountainous

15+220

16

61.9

25.85

Mountainous

15+240

16

62.19

25.73

Mountainous

15+260

16

60.52

26.44

Mountainous

15+280

16

60.96

26.25

Mountainous

15+300

12

59.21

20.27

Rolling

15+320

12

67.21

17.85

Rolling

15+340

10

61.63

16.23

Rolling

15+360

55.67

14.37

Rolling

15+380

71.14

11.25

Rolling

15+400

55.63

10.79

Rolling
174

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

15+420

35.66

11.22

Rolling

15+440

89.63

6.69

Rolling

15+460

99.54

6.03

Rolling

15+480

86.28

9.27

Rolling

15+500

59.36

10.11

Rolling

Annexe-2 Natural ground profile and the finished road grade elevation

175
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Grade
Elevation

Station

Natu. Elevation

Highway Design
Senior Project1386.00
12+500
1384.30

13+360

1398.60

2010
1393.60

12+520

1384.50

1386.18

13+380

1398.00

1393.80

12+540

1384.30

1386.36

13+400

1396.70

1393.98

12+560

1384.50

1386.53

13+420

1395.30

1394.16

12+580

1384.30

1386.71

13+440

1394.20

1394.33

12+600

1385.00

1386.89

13+460

1394.00

1394.51

12+620

1386.10

1387.06

13+480

1394.00

1394.67

Station

Natu. Elevation

1387.24
Grade 13+500
Station
Elevation
Elevation 1387.42
1388.40
13+520

Grade
Eleation

12+640 Station1387.30Natural

1393.40
Natural

12+660

Elevation
1393.00

1394.73
Grade
Elevation
1394.68

12+680 14+2201389.501377.60

1375.90 13+540
14+880
1387.60

1367.50
1393.00

1367.20
1394.51

12+700 14+2401390.201378.00

1376.00 13+560
14+900
1387.77

1367.60
1392.50

1366.70
1394.23

12+720 14+2601390.301378.20

1376.10 13+580
14+920
1387.95

1367.00
1391.80

1366.20
1393.84

12+740 14+2801390.301378.10

1376.20 13+600
14+940
1388.13

1366.30
1390.50

1365.70
1393.34

12+760 14+3001390.001378.20

1376.30 13+620
14+960
1388.31

1365.90
1390.00

1365.25
1392.73

12+780 14+3201389.901378.10

1376.35 13+640
14+980
1388.48

1365.70
1389.50

1364.80
1392.00

12+800 14+3401390.101377.80

1376.40 13+660
15+000
1388.66

1365.60
1388.90

1364.30
1391.18

12+820 14+3601389.701377.80

1376.51 13+680
15+020
1388.84

1365.60
1387.70

1363.80
1390.24

12+840 14+3801389.001377.30

1376.56 13+700
15+040
1389.01

1365.60
1386.00

1363.30
1389.28

12+860 14+4001389.001377.20

1376.57 13+720
15+060
1389.19

1365.00
1385.40

1362.80
1388.32

12+880 14+4201388.801378.00

1376.53 13+740
15+080
1389.37

1365.00
1385.00

1362.30
1387.30

12+900 14+4401388.601376.40

1376.45 13+760
15+100
1389.55

1364.90
1385.00

1361.80
1386.40

12+920 14+4601388.901376.10

1376.32 13+780
15+120
1389.72

1365.00
1384.00

1361.30
1385.40

12+940 14+4801388.601375.60

1376.14 13+800
15+140
1389.90

1363.90
1383.50

1360.80
1384.50

12+960 14+5001388.401375.30

1375.91 13+820
15+160
1390.01

1363.70
1384.10

1360.30
1383.59

12+980 14+5201387.701375.00

1375.64 13+840
15+180
1390.26

1363.80
1385.40

1359.85
1382.63

13+000 14+5401387.501374.40

1375.31 13+860
15+200
1390.43

1363.00
1384.50

1359.40
1381.76

13+020 14+5601387.001374.20

1374.94 13+880
15+220
1390.61

1363.00
1384.00

1358.70
1380.96

13+040 14+5801387.001373.60

1374.53 13+900
15+240
1390.79

1362.40
1382.10

1358.40
1380.21

13+060 14+6001387.301373.00

1374.08 13+920
15+260
1390.96

1359.60
1380.23

1357.90
1379.53

13+080

1391.14

1379.00

1378.89

13+100
1387.90
1391.32
13+960
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)
13+120
1389.00
1391.50
13+980

1376.00

1378.34

1374.30

1377.80

13+140

1373.50

1377.34

1387.20

1389.80

1391.67

13+940

14+000

176

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

14+620

1372.10

1373.60

15+280

1357.80

1357.40

14+640

1371.30

1373.10

15+300

1356.00

1356.90

14+660

1370.80

1372.60

15+320

1354.40

1356.40

14+680

1369.80

1371.10

15+340

1353.80

1355.90

14+700

1369.50

1371.60

15+360

1352.20

1355.40

14+720

1369.40

1371.10

15+380

1351.90

1354.90

14+740

1369.00

1370.64

15+400

1351.90

1354.45

14+760

1369.00

1370.20

15+420

1351.90

1353.96

14+780

1368.50

1369.70

15+440

1349.90

1353.47

14+800

1368.00

1369.20

15+460

1346.00

1353.00

14+820

1368.10

1368.70

15+480

1351.00

1352.59

14+840

1367.90

1368.20

15+500

1353.00

1352.00

14+860

1367.70

1367.70

177
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Annexe-3 Nomograph

178
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Anexe-4 Axle load survey and EF computation


179
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Traffic count for day 13,

Small Bus

axle1

axle2

Axle EF1

Axle EF2

Total EF

SB (25)

3300

3350

0.017

0.018

0.035

SB (14)

1150

1650

0.000

0.001

0.001

SB (25)

1800

2850

0.001

0.009

0.010

SB (25)

2250

3850

0.003

0.034

0.037

SB (25)

2300

3800

0.003

0.032

0.035

SB (25)

2250

4000

0.003

0.040

0.043

SB (25)

2350

3000

0.004

0.011

0.015

SB (25)

2400

3800

0.004

0.032

0.036

SB (25)

2350

3050

0.004

0.012

0.016

SB (25)

2400

4400

0.004

0.062

0.066

Sum

0.295

Large Bus
axle1

axle2

axleEF1

Axle EF2

Total EF
180

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

LB (45)

3800

6200

0.032

0.291

0.323

LB (45)

4400

6600

0.062

0.385

0.447

LB (45)

3350

5400

0.018

0.156

0.174

LB (60)

6000

7450

0.251

0.664

0.915

LB (45)

3850

7050

0.034

0.518

0.552

LB (45)

4350

6000

0.059

0.251

0.310

LB (62)

7000

9150

0.502

1.674

2.176

LB (62)

5450

9600

0.163

2.078

2.240

LB (45)

4050

7450

0.043

0.664

0.707

LB(45)

3550

6750

0.024

0.426

0.449

Sum

8.292

Medium truck
axle1

axle2

MT

2850

MT

axle3

axleEF1

axleEF2

Axle EF3

Total EF

5400

0.009

0.156

0.000

0.165

1600

1350

0.001

0.000

0.000

0.001

MT

1700

1550

0.001

0.001

0.000

0.001

MT

2200

3300

0.003

0.017

0.000

0.020

MT

1500

1600

0.000

0.001

0.000

0.001

MT

2300

2500

0.003

0.005

0.000

0.008

MT

2450

2250

0.004

0.003

0.000

0.007

MT

2850

3700

0.009

0.028

0.000

0.037

MT

1800

1600

0.001

0.001

0.000

0.002

MT

1600

2700

0.001

0.007

0.000

0.008

Sum

0.250

Large truck

LT

axle1

axle2

6450

15950

axle3

axle4

Axle EF1

Axle EF2

Axle
EF3

0.35

20.41

0.00

Axle
EF4

Total
EF

0.00

20.756
181

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

LT

4200

5250

0.05

0.14

0.00

0.00

0.188

LT

6050

14200

0.26

12.10

0.00

0.00

12.358

LT

5950

11800

0.24

5.26

0.00

0.00

5.500

LT

6250

14300

0.30

12.49

0.00

0.00

12.787

LT

8250

9900

9850

1.05

2.39

2.33

0.00

5.770

LT

8950

10700

10750

1.52

3.39

3.46

0.00

8.358

LT

4800

8950

0.09

1.52

0.00

0.00

1.607

LT

7000

13000

0.50

8.13

0.00

0.00

8.632

LT

5900

12600

0.23

7.06

0.00

0.00

7.297

Sum

83.253

Truck trailer

axle1 axle2

axle3

axle4

axle5

axle
axle6 EF1

axle EF2

axle
EF3

axle
EF4

axle
EF5
182

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

axle
EF6

totalEF

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

TT

6050

15250 11000

11400

0.26

16.68

3.83

4.50

0.00

0.00

25.27

TT

6300

15000 8350

9450

0.31

15.48

1.11

1.94

0.00

0.00

18.84

TT

6350

14600 7950

9150

0.32

13.71

0.89

1.67

0.00

0.00

16.60

TT

5900

14800 8750

9750

0.23

14.57

1.37

2.23

0.00

0.00

18.40

TT

5750

13200 8300

7100

0.21

8.71

1.08

0.53

0.00

0.00

10.53

TT

6150

11400

11300

0.28

4.50

4.87

4.33

8.42

0.00

22.40

TT

6950

15800 7750

9500

0.49

19.56

0.79

1.98

0.00

0.00

22.82

TT

2350

17000 8050

9200

0.00

27.19

0.94

1.72

0.00

0.00

29.85

TT

6850

13600 9150

9150

0.45

9.96

1.67

1.67

0.00

0.00

13.76

TT

6450

11000

10800

0.35

3.83

3.83

3.53

2.61

0.00

14.16

Sum

192.63

11600

11000

13100

10100

Traffic count for day 14,Small Bus

SB (25)

Axle1

Axle2

Axle1 Ef

Axle2 EF

Total EF

2300

3450

0.003

0.021

0.024
183

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

SB (25)

2250

2500

0.003

0.005

0.008

SB (25)

2350

3700

0.004

0.028

0.032

SB (25)

2250

4400

0.003

0.062

0.065

SB (25)

2200

3950

0.003

0.038

0.041

SB (25)

1750

2800

0.001

0.008

0.009

SB (25)

2200

3250

0.003

0.016

0.019

SB (25)

2300

3500

0.003

0.022

0.026

SB (25)

2550

4300

0.005

0.056

0.061

SB (25)

2150

3550

0.002

0.024

0.026

Sum

0.311

Large Bus
Axle1

Axle2

Axle1 Ef

Axle2 EF

Total EF

LB (45)

2100

5950

0.002

0.241

0.244

LB (45)

4150

7550

0.048

0.705

0.753

LB (62)

4600

7900

0.076

0.864

0.940

LB (62)

6600

9200

0.385

1.716

2.101

LB (62)

6600

9200

0.385

1.716

2.101

LB (62)

4000

6700

0.040

0.412

0.452

LB (45)

3900

5800

0.036

0.215

0.251

LB (45)

3400

6000

0.019

0.251

0.270

LB (62)

5300

8250

0.143

1.051

1.194

LB (45)

4200

7100

0.050

0.535

0.585

Sum

8.890

Medium truck
Axle1

Axle2

Axle1 Ef

Axle2 EF

Total EF

MT

1700

1850

0.001

0.001

0.002

MT

3650

3200

0.027

0.015

0.042
184

ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

MT

3150

2250

0.014

0.003

0.017

MT

3250

3300

0.016

0.017

0.033

MT

2800

6650

0.008

0.398

0.406

MT

3250

2700

0.016

0.007

0.023

MT

1700

1150

0.001

0.000

0.001

MT

1850

1400

0.001

0.000

0.002

MT

2600

5950

0.006

0.241

0.247

MT

2750

5150

0.007

0.126

0.134
Sum

0.906

Large truck
Axle1
Ef

Axle2
EF

Axle3
EF

Axle4
EF

Axle5
EF

Total
EF

0.06

0.77

0.75

0.00

0.00

1.58

0.09

1.14

2.33

3.91

4.24

11.72

10950

0.79

3.11

3.76

0.00

0.00

7.66

2950

2900

0.05

0.01

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.06

7600

11200

11300

0.73

4.16

4.33

0.00

0.00

9.21

LT

7000

12100

9050

0.50

5.89

1.59

0.00

0.00

7.98

LT

5200

5300

0.13

0.14

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.28

LT

4100

3800

0.05

0.03

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.08

LT

5750

15250

0.21

16.68

0.00

0.00

0.00

16.88

LT

3650

3550

0.03

0.02

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.05

Axle1

Axle2

Axle3

LT

4350

7700

7650

LT

4800

8400

9850

LT

7750

10500

LT

4100

LT

Axle4

11050

Axle5

11250

Sum

55.50

Truck trailer
Axle1

Axle2

Axle3

Axle4

TT

4100

4550

2700

2550

TT

5350

10850

11050

8900

TT

7800

12950

10050

8150

Axle1
Ef

Axle2
EF

Axle3
EF

Axle4
EF

Axle5
EF

Axle6
EF

Total
EF

0.05

0.07

0.01

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.13

9250

0.15

3.60

3.91

1.48

1.76

0.00

10.90

9400

0.82

7.99

2.55

0.99

1.89

0.00

14.25

Axle5

Axle6

185
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

TT

6050

14600

9250

9100

TT

8450

11600

11650

11000

7200

TT

6650

10950

11500

10500

13300

TT

6500

15000

8300

TT

5200

16300

TT

5200

TT

7900

2010

0.26

13.71

1.76

1.63

0.00

0.00

17.36

1.17

4.87

4.96

3.83

0.57

0.86

16.27

0.40

3.76

4.68

3.11

9.01

0.00

20.96

8700

0.36

15.48

1.08

1.33

0.00

0.00

18.25

10300

10600

0.13

22.50

2.85

3.25

0.00

0.00

28.73

16000

9700

11000

0.13

20.70

2.18

3.83

0.00

0.00

26.84

13100

9400

6500

0.86

8.42

1.89

0.36

0.00

0.00

11.53

7900

Sum

165.22

Traffic count for day 15,Small Bus


Axle1

Axle2

Axle1 Ef

Axle2 EF

Total EF

SB (25)

3450

5050

0.021

0.115

0.136

SB (25)

4000

4450

0.040

0.065

0.106

SB (25)

2150

3850

0.002

0.034

0.037

SB (25)

2400

3900

0.004

0.036

0.040

SB (25)

2200

4150

0.003

0.048

0.050

SB (25)

2200

4150

0.003

0.048

0.050

SB (25)

2450

4050

0.004

0.043

0.047

SB (25)

2550

4050

0.005

0.043

0.048

SB (25)

2050

2650

0.002

0.006

0.008

SB (25)

2300

2900

0.003

0.010

0.013
Sum

0.536

Large Bus
Axle1

Axle2

Axle1 Ef

Axle2 EF

Total EF

LB(45)

4400

7100

0.062

0.535

0.597

LB(24)

2300

3350

0.003

0.018

0.022

LB(45)

3600

6850

0.025

0.455

0.480

LB (45)

3750

5100

0.030

0.121

0.151

186
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

LB (45)

4250

7200

0.053

0.569

0.622

LB (45)

3600

4250

0.025

0.053

0.078

LB (45)

3900

5600

0.036

0.184

0.220

LB (45)

3650

5150

0.027

0.126

0.153

LB (45)

6050

7400

0.260

0.644

0.904

LB (45)

3950

7350

0.038

0.625

0.663
3.890

Medium truck
Axle1

Axle2

Axle1 Ef

Axle2 EF

Total EF

MT

2800

2050

0.008

0.002

0.010

MT

2150

3700

0.002

0.028

0.031

MT

2150

3400

0.002

0.019

0.022

MT

1900

2150

0.001

0.002

0.004

MT

2800

2050

0.008

0.002

0.010

MT

1850

2400

0.001

0.004

0.005

MT

1750

1700

0.001

0.001

0.002

MT

2250

1850

0.003

0.001

0.004

MT

1600

1200

0.001

0.000

0.001

MT

1750

1450

0.001

0.000

0.001
0.0907

Large truck
Axle1
Ef

Axle2
EF

Axle3
EF

Axle4
EF

Axle5
EF

Axle6
EF

Total
EF

11800

0.91

5.26

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

6.17

4400

3800

0.06

0.03

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.09

LT

4900

3600

0.10

0.03

0.03

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.15

LT

6200

12300

0.29

6.34

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

6.63

Axle1

Axle2

LT

8000

LT

Axle3

3650

Axle4

Axle5

Axle6

187
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project


LT

8200

11800

LT

5950

LT

11800

1.02

5.26

5.26

3.76

0.49

0.79

16.57

15100

0.24

15.95

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

16.19

4800

4750

0.09

0.09

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.18

LT

5250

5200

0.14

0.13

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.27

LT

5500

3700

0.17

0.03

0.02

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.23

LT

4350

4900

0.06

0.10

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.16

3500

10950

2010

3000

6950

2100

7750

Sum

46.66

188
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Truck trailer
Axle1

Axle2

Axle3

Axle4

Axle5

Axle6

Total

Axle1

Axle2

Axle3

Axle4

Axle5

Axle6

Ef

EF

EF

EF

EF

EF

EF

TT

5800

4200

2450

2600

2350

1400

0.22

0.05

0.00

0.01

0.004

0.0004

0.28

TT

6300

14500

8400

8650

0.31

13.29

1.14

1.30

0.00

0.00

16.04

TT

8250

16300

11200

9300

1.05

22.50

4.16

1.80

0.00

0.00

29.51

TT

4150

4850

3100

3100

0.05

0.10

0.01

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.17

TT

3750

5250

3100

3150

0.03

0.14

0.01

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.19

TT

6900

10300

7900

6600

0.47

2.85

0.86

0.38

0.00

0.00

4.57

TT

7900

11950

11900

11300

0.86

5.57

5.46

4.33

0.94

0.84

18.00

TT

4050

5100

2950

3050

0.04

0.12

0.01

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.19

TT

5650

15900

9400

10500

0.19

20.12

1.89

3.11

0.00

0.00

25.31

TT

5350

15400

8400

11300

0.15

17.43

1.14

4.33

0.00

0.00

23.04

8050

7850

117.3

189
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

190
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Traffic count for day 16


Small Bus
Axle1
Ef

Axle2
EF

Axle3
EF

Total EF

2850

0.001

0.009

0.000

0.009

2300

3300

0.003

0.017

0.000

0.020

SB
(25)

2250

4250

0.003

0.053

0.000

0.056

SB
(25)

2100

3950

0.002

0.038

0.000

0.040

SB
(25)

2300

3250

0.003

0.016

0.000

0.019

SB
(25)

2250

4050

0.003

0.043

0.000

0.046

SB
(25)

2200

4150

0.003

0.048

0.000

0.050

SB
(25)

4000

5700

0.040

0.199

0.000

0.239

SB
(25)

2450

3550

0.004

0.024

0.000

0.028

SB
(25)

1950

3750

0.002

0.030

0.000

0.032

Axle1

Axle2

SB
(25)

1600

SB
(25)

Axle3

Sum

0.541

191
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

Large Bus
Axle1

Axle2

Axle1 Ef

Axle2 EF

Total EF

LB (45)

3850

6400

0.034

0.335

0.369

LB (45)

4150

6400

0.048

0.335

0.383

LB (45)

3900

6900

0.036

0.470

0.506

LB (62)

6100

7650

0.270

0.748

1.018

LB (45)

3750

7450

0.030

0.664

0.694

LB (62)

4850

9950

0.096

2.441

2.537

LB (45)

5500

10550

0.169

3.177

3.347

LB (45)

3500

6350

0.022

0.324

0.346

LB (45)

4300

6500

0.056

0.359

0.415

LB (45)

2850

6700

0.009

0.412

0.421
10.036

Medium truck
Axle1
Ef

Axle2
EF

Axle3 EF

Axle4
EF

Axle5
EF

Total EF

1600

0.001

0.001

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.002

2750

5550

0.007

0.176

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.184

MT

1950

2300

0.002

0.003

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.005

MT

4600

10200

0.076

2.730

0.032

0.017

0.021

2.875

MT

2200

3550

0.003

0.024

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.026

MT

4450

6800

0.065

0.440

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.506

MT

3000

4500

0.011

0.069

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.080

Axle1

Axle2

MT

1850

MT

Axle3

3800

Axle4

3300

Axle5

3450

192
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project


MT

1850

5150

MT

2550

MT

2250

2010

2800

0.001

0.126

0.008

0.000

0.000

0.135

4000

0.005

0.040

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.046

1850

0.003

0.001

0.000

0.000

0.000

0.004
3.863

Large truck
Axle1

Axle2

LT

4150

5250

LT

7300

10850

LT

6000

LT

Axle3

Axle1 Ef

Axle2 EF

Axle3 EF

Total EF

0.048

0.137

0.000

0.185

0.606

3.604

3.530

7.740

13600

0.251

9.961

0.000

10.212

7700

16300

0.770

22.503

0.000

23.273

LT

4350

4250

0.059

0.053

0.000

0.112

LT

4350

4300

0.059

0.056

0.000

0.115

LT

5950

7600

0.241

0.726

0.726

1.694

LT

4400

4600

0.062

0.076

0.000

0.138

LT

7800

11750

0.816

5.159

0.000

5.975

LT

4850

6150

0.096

0.280

0.000

0.376

10800

7600

49.821

Truck trailer
Axle1
EF

Axle2
EF

Axle3
EF

Axle4
EF

Axle5
EF

Axle6
EF

Total
EF

0.13

0.02

0.03

0.02

0.03

0.00

0.22

0.24

9.80

2.03

1.40

0.00

0.00

13.47

0.75

5.46

5.46

4.50

0.50

1.02

17.70

0.84

15.48

2.33

2.44

0.00

0.00

21.10

0.68

5.46

5.26

4.16

0.38

1.23

17.18

11500

0.18

8.86

2.08

4.68

0.00

0.00

15.80

10300

0.14

19.56

1.89

2.85

0.00

0.00

24.44

Axle1

Axle2

Axle3

Axle4

Axle5

TT

5150

3450

3700

3500

3650

TT

5950

13550

9550

8800

TT

7650

11900

11900

11400

TT

7850

15000

9850

9950

TT

7500

11900

11800

11200

TT

5550

13250

9600

TT

5300

15800

9400

7000

6600

Axle6

8200

8550

193
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

TT

5850

14700

8850

9350

0.22

14.14

1.44

1.85

0.00

0.00

17.65

TT

5300

4350

3100

3300

0.14

0.06

0.01

0.02

0.00

0.00

0.23

TT

6200

14800

7950

9250

0.29

14.57

0.89

1.76

0.00

0.00

17.51
145.30

Traffic count for day 17 ; Small Bus


Axle1

Axle2

Axle1 Ef

Axle2 EF

Total EF

SB (25)

2250

3800

0.003

0.032

0.035

SB (25)

2500

4800

0.005

0.092

0.097

SB (25)

2550

4150

0.005

0.048

0.053

SB (25)

2550

4400

0.005

0.062

0.067

SB (25)

2200

4100

0.003

0.045

0.048

SB (25)

2600

3750

0.006

0.030

0.036

SB (25)

2250

4250

0.003

0.053

0.056

SB (25)

1500

2750

0.000

0.007

0.008

SB (25)

2450

3600

0.004

0.025

0.030

SB (25)

2250

2700

0.003

0.007

0.010
0.440

Large Bus
Axle1

Axle2

Axle1 Ef

Axle2 EF

Total EF

LB (45)

2350

3550

0.0037

0.0236

0.0273

LB (45)

4050

6700

0.0428

0.4118

0.4546

LB (60)

4250

7550

0.0531

0.7049

0.7581

LB (45)

3800

4800

0.0321

0.0918

0.1239

LB (45)

3850

7400

0.0340

0.6441

0.6781

LB (62)

5750

10000

0.2070

2.4969

2.7038

LB (45)

3650

7400

0.0268

0.6441

0.6708

LB (45)

3850

5700

0.0340

0.1990

0.2330

LB (45)

4400

6900

0.0621

0.4701

0.5322

194
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

LB (62)

7250

2010

9650

0.5874

2.1270

2.7144
8.8963

Medium truck
Axle1

Axle2

Axle1 Ef

Axle2 EF

Total EF

MT

2750

9600

0.007

2.078

2.085

MT

2250

1800

0.003

0.001

0.004

MT

2200

1850

0.003

0.001

0.004

MT

2650

3700

0.006

0.028

0.035

MT

2550

4700

0.005

0.084

0.089

MT

2700

2100

0.007

0.002

0.009

MT

3650

9700

0.027

2.177

2.204

MT

3900

8850

0.036

1.441

1.477

MT

3400

4700

0.019

0.084

0.103

MT

2100

2350

0.002

0.004

0.006
6.016

Large truck
Axle1

Axle2

LT

2650

LT

Axle3

Axle1 Ef

Axle2 EF

Axle3 EF

Total EF

2050

0.006

0.002

0.000

0.008

6400

14350

0.335

12.683

0.000

13.018

LT

5800

17050

0.215

27.552

0.000

27.767

LT

6200

15750

0.291

19.282

0.000

19.573

LT

5600

3450

0.184

0.021

0.024

0.228

LT

6150

14400

0.280

12.883

0.000

13.163

LT

7000

8350

0.502

1.109

1.674

3.285

3550

9150

195
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project


LT

7450

12500

LT

5600

LT

4900

2010
12350

0.664

6.815

6.455

13.934

4700

0.184

0.084

0.000

0.267

4250

0.101

0.053

0.000

0.154

Sum

91.3984

Truck trailer
Axle1
Ef

Axle2
EF

Axle3 EF

Axle4
EF

Axle5
EF

Total
EF

0.04

0.08

0.01

0.01

0.00

0.14

0.13

0.03

0.03

0.02

0.02

0.22

11000

1.37

12.88

2.61

3.83

0.00

20.70

8800

9400

0.37

11.53

1.40

1.89

0.00

15.20

4350

2350

2450

0.07

0.06

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.14

6150

15400

8000

8900

0.28

17.43

0.91

1.48

0.00

20.10

TT

6600

13750

8550

9400

0.38

10.47

1.23

1.89

0.00

13.97

TT

6950

12300

11700

11800

11400

0.49

6.34

5.06

5.26

4.50

21.65

TT

6850

12350

11800

10450

10700

0.45

6.45

5.26

3.04

3.39

18.60

TT

7700

16200

10500

13300

0.77

21.89

3.11

9.01

0.00

34.78

Axle1

Axle2

Axle3

Axle4

TT

4050

4650

2650

2650

TT

5150

3650

3750

3250

TT

8750

14400

10100

TT

6550

14050

TT

4500

TT

Axle5

3400

145.48

Traffic count for day 18; Small Bus


Axle1

Axle2

Axle1 Ef

Axle2 EF

Total EF

SB (25)

2150

4250

0.002

0.053

0.056

SB (25)

2450

4000

0.004

0.040

0.045

SB (25)

2250

4050

0.003

0.043

0.046

SB (25)

2150

3500

0.002

0.022

0.025

SB (25)

3350

6000

0.018

0.251

0.269

SB (25)

2050

3900

0.002

0.036

0.038

SB (25)

3350

5450

0.018

0.163

0.181

196
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

SB (25)

2200

3900

0.003

0.036

0.039

SB (25)

1500

2750

0.000

0.007

0.008

SB (25)

2400

4000

0.004

0.040

0.044

Sum

0.750

Large Bus
Axle1

Axle2

Axle1 Ef

Axle2 EF

Total EF

LB (62)

6000

7450

0.251

0.664

0.915

LB (45)

4350

6450

0.059

0.347

0.406

LB (45)

3850

5900

0.034

0.232

0.266

LB (45)

4000

7650

0.040

0.748

0.788

LB (45)

4050

6150

0.043

0.280

0.323

LB (62)

5850

5800

0.224

0.215

0.439

LB (45)

5750

10750

0.207

3.457

3.664

LB (45)

5000

9450

0.110

1.936

2.046

LB (45

5150

8350

0.126

1.109

1.235

LB (62)

3800

7700

0.032

0.770

0.802

Sum

10.885

Medium truck
Axle1

Axle2

Axle1 Ef

Axle2 EF

Total EF

MT

1300

1350

0.0003

0.0003

0.001

MT

2500

4800

0.0049

0.0918

0.097

MT

1850

1750

0.0013

0.0010

0.002

MT

1850

1850

0.0013

0.0013

0.003

MT

2400

1650

0.0041

0.0008

0.005

MT

2300

3150

0.0034

0.0138

0.017

MT

2400

2450

0.0041

0.0045

0.009

MT

1950

1350

0.0016

0.0003

0.002

197
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

MT

2350

3250

0.0037

0.0159

0.020

MT

1750

1400

0.0010

0.0004

0.001

Sum

0.155

Large truck
Axle1

Axle2

LT

6450

LT

Axle3

Axle1 Ef

Axle2 EF

Axle3 EF

Total EF

14500

0.347

13.291

0.000

13.638

7300

13300

0.606

9.010

0.000

9.616

LT

5000

8700

0.110

1.334

1.334

2.779

LT

3300

2900

0.017

0.010

0.000

0.027

LT

4350

4280

0.059

0.055

0.000

0.114

LT

6300

14600

0.312

13.708

0.000

14.020

LT

6700

1000

0.412

0.000

3.110

3.522

LT

7850

12000

0.840

5.672

0.000

6.512

LT

7200

11700

0.569

5.061

0.000

5.630

LT

4350

8550

0.059

1.234

1.234

2.527

8700

10500

8550

Sum

58.384

Truck trailer (TT)


Axle1
Ef

Axle2
EF

Axle3
EF

Axle4
EF

Axle5
EF

Axle6
EF

Total
EF

9150

0.66

13.50

1.89

1.67

0.00

0.00

17.73

2200

2200

0.05

0.05

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.11

4050

2950

3200

0.04

0.04

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.02

0.14

7200

13300

9100

9850

0.57

9.01

1.63

2.33

0.00

0.00

13.55

TT

4150

4800

2800

2950

0.05

0.09

0.01

0.01

0.00

0.00

0.16

TT

7600

13200

8600

8550

0.73

8.71

1.27

1.23

0.00

0.00

11.94

TT

6350

16200

10800

10800

0.32

21.89

3.53

3.53

0.00

0.00

29.27

Axle1

Axle2

Axle3

Axle4

TT

7450

14550

9400

TT

4150

4250

TT

4050

TT

Axle5

2800

Axle6

3450

198
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

Highway Design Senior Project

2010

TT

4250

4250

2300

2250

0.05

0.05

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.11

TT

5550

15050

10300

10800

0.18

15.71

2.85

3.53

0.00

0.00

22.27

TT

4600

10750

10650

11800

0.08

3.46

3.31

5.26

5.06

0.00

17.17

11700

Sum

112.44

Part II
Drawings

199
ECSC, IUDS, Urban Engineering Department (UE)

S-ar putea să vă placă și