In determining the existence of an employeremployee relationship, this Court has generally
relied on the four-fold test, to wit: (1) the selection and engagement of the employee; (2) the payment of wages; (3) the power of dismissal; and (4) the employers power to control the employee with respect to the means and methods by which the work is to be accomplished.29 Among the four, the most determinative factor in ascertaining the existence of employeremployee relationship is the "right of control test".30 "It is deemed to be such an important factor that the other requisites may even be disregarded."31 This holds true where the issues to be resolved iswhether a person who performs work for another is the latters employee or is an independent contractor,32 as in this case. For where the person for whom the services are performed reserves the right to control not only the end to beachieved, but also the means by which such end is reached, employer-employee relationship is deemed to exist.33 (ROYALE HOMES MARKETING CORPORATION, Petitioner, vs. FIDEL P. ALCANTARA [deceased], substituted by his heirs, Respondent.) 2. Abandonment as just cause for termination of employment As defined under established jurisprudence, abandonment is the deliberate and unjustified refusal of an employee to resume his
employment.22 It constitutes neglect of duty and
is a just cause for termination of employment under paragraph (b) of Article 282 of the Labor Code.23 To constitute abandonment, however, there must be a clear and deliberate intent to discontinue one's employment without any intention of returning. In this regard, two elements must concur: (1) failure to report for work or absence without valid or justifiable reason, and (2) a clear intention to sever the employer-employee relationship, with the second element as the more determinative factor and being manifested by some overt acts.24 Otherwise stated, absence must be accompanied by overt acts unerringly pointing to the fact that the employee simply does not want to work anymore.25 It has been ruled that the employer has the burden of proof to show a deliberate and unjustified refusal of the employee to resume his employment without any intention of returning.26 (TAN BROTHERS CORPORATION OF BASILAN CITY THROUGH ITS OWNER/MANAGER, MAURO F. TAN,PETITIONERS, vs. EDNA R. ESCUDERO, RESPONDENT.) 3. Suppose the employer denies dismissing the employee, who has the duty to prove that the dismissal is without valid cause? The employee must elaborate, support or substantiate his or her complaint that he or she was dismissed without valid cause (Ledesma, Jr. vs. NLRC, 537 SCRA 358, October 19, 2007).
4. What is separation pay?
In termination for authorized causes, separation pay is the amount given to an employee terminated due to installation of labor-saving devices, redundancy, retrenchment, closure or cessation of business or incurable disease. Separation pay may also be granted to an illegally dismissed employee in lieu of reinstatement. 5. When is a dismissed employee entitled to separation pay? The Labor Code requires a valid cause to terminate an employee. If there is no valid cause, there is no valid termination and the employer will be held liable for illegal dismissal. If the cause of dismissal falls under any of the five circumstances of Article 282, no separation pay shall be given to the dismissed employee. In dismissal cases falling under Article 283, separation pay shall only be required if the dismissal is due to the installation of labor-saving
devices or redundancy. In these two cases, the
worker affected thereby shall be entitled to a separation pay equivalent to at least his one (1) month pay or to at least one (1) month pay for every year of service, whichever is higher. If the dismissal is due to retrenchment to prevent losses or closures or cessation of operations of establishment or undertaking not due to serious business losses or financial reverses the separation pay shall be equivalent to one (1) month pay or at least one-half (1/2) month pay for every year of service, whichever is higher. In all cases, a fraction of at least six (6) months shall be considered one (1) whole year. On the other hand if the dismissal is due retrenchment to prevent losses or closures cessation of operations of establishment undertaking due to serious business losses financial reverses no separation pay shall given to the dismissed employee.