TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES

RUBRIC FOR OJT/Practicum Final Written Report

Performance
Indicators

Unsatisfactory
1

Developing
2

Satisfactory
3

Very Satisfactory
4

The student passed the final

report a week after the
deadline.

The student passed the final

report less than a week after
the deadline.

The student passed the final

report on time.

The student passed the final

report ahead of time.

2. Alignment with
Student Outcome

The final report does not

contain tasks aligned with the
Programs Student Outcome.

The final report contains one or

two tasks aligned with the
Programs Student Outcome.

Most assigned tasks are

aligned with required student
outcome.

All assigned tasks are perfectly

aligned with the student
outcomes.

3. Written
Communication

Mechanical errors are strongly

evident with the students final
report.

Major errors are evident with

the students final report.

Minor errors are evident with

the students final report.

No grammatical errors found in

the students final report.

4. Reflection of
Personal
Learning

Little or no explanation or
reflection on learning, no or few
details to support reflection.

Does not go deeply into the

reflection of learning,
generalization and limited
insight, uses some detail.

Relates learning with personal

and general reflections
included, uses concrete
language.

5. Organization

Ideas seem to be randomly

arranged. No effort at
paragraph organization.

The report is pretty well

organized. One idea may seem
out of place. Clear transitions
are used.

6. Conclusion

Incomplete and/or unfocused.

The report is a little hard to

follow. Paragraphs are unclear.
The transitions are sometimes
not clear.
The conclusion does not
adequately restate the
learning.

Shows great depth of

knowledge and learning,
reveals feelings and thoughts,
abstract ideas reflected
through use of specific details.
The report is very well
organized. One idea or scene
follows another in a logical
sequence with clear transitions.

The conclusion restates the

learning.

The conclusion is engaging,

and restates personal learning.

1. Time

Total Score
Mean Score = (Total Score / 6)
Percentage Rating = (Total Score / 24) x 100%

Evaluated by:

Score

ENGR. CONRAD A. POPULI

OJT Faculty-In-Charge, CEA-QC