Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Document 1
Filed 08/17/16
Page 1 of 7
CROWELL LAW
Carl D. Crowell, OSB No. 982049
email: carl@crowell-law.com
P.O. Box 923
Salem, OR 97308
(503) 581-1240
Of attorneys for plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF OREGON
EUGENE DIVISION
ISA CORPORATION,
Case No.:6:16-cv-01667
Plaintiff,
v.
COMPLAINT
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
Defendants.
This is an action for infringement of ISAs registered trademark DEEKS, Reg. No.
3,018,530 for use with hunting decoys. The original DEEKS decoys were manufactured by Mr.
John Feusner, Sr., over 70 years ago by his company Intermountain Rubber Company. In the
late 1960s the company then called Deeks, Inc., applied for and registered the distinctive
trademark name DEEKS. Reg. 903,419. In the 1970s Mr. Feusners son, John Feusner, Jr. took
over and production is now though ISA Corporation of Salem, Oregon, still run and managed by
the Feusner family and the mark is now registered to ISA. Reg. No. 3,018,530.
COMPLAINT
Page 1 of 7
CROWELL LAW
WWW.CROWELL-LAW.COM
Case 6:16-cv-01667-TC
2.
Document 1
Filed 08/17/16
Page 2 of 7
Defendants Double Deeks, LLC and Approved Graphics Design, LLC, produce a
competing duck decoy marked and marketed under the confusingly similar and infringing
DOUBLE DEEKS name in direct violation of ISAs rights and expressly trading on ISAs
famous DEEKS name and goodwill for quality hunting decoys.
This is an action for trademark infringement and unfair competition arising under the
This court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
1121 and 28 U.S.C 1338(a), in that this is a civil action arising under the Trademark Act.
5.
This court has jurisdiction over the defendants for one or more of the following reasons:
a. The defendants do business nationwide and purposely avail themselves of and
market to and transact with the citizens of Oregon, selling products in this state.
b. With knowledge of the specific harm to be caused ISA in Oregon one or more of
the defendants took action to infringe ISAs rights and cause ISA harm.
c. The defendants placed goods into commerce with full knowledge of their national
distribution, including distribution to Oregon.
6.
Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) in that ISA is a
resident of Marion County, Oregon and the harm suffered was directed at and caused in this
district.
///
COMPLAINT
Page 2 of 7
CROWELL LAW
WWW.CROWELL-LAW.COM
Case 6:16-cv-01667-TC
Document 1
Filed 08/17/16
Page 3 of 7
PARTIES
ISA
7.
Plaintiff ISA Corporation (ISA) is an Oregon business having its principal place of
ISA is the owner of U.S. Trademark Registration No. 3,018,530 for the trademark
DEEKS. Exhibit 1.
9.
10.
ISA is the successor in ownership of the DEEKS trademark and associated goodwill from
the original applicant and owner, who first used the mark over 70 years ago and first registered
the mark in 1970. Registration No. 903,419.
11.
ISAs DEEKS mark has been maintained and used in commerce at all relevant times and
The DEEKS mark for use with duck decoys is famous and well known and in particular
was specifically known to at least one of the defendants as they confirm the naming of their
product after ISAs DEEKS product.
DEFENDANTS
Double Deeks, LLC
13.
Double Deeks, LLC is a Texas Limited Liability Company with offices at 520 Kiowa
Double Deeks, LLC markets products nationally and does business nationally selling
duck decoys marked and branded with the infringing DOUBLE DEEKS mark.
COMPLAINT
Page 3 of 7
CROWELL LAW
WWW.CROWELL-LAW.COM
Case 6:16-cv-01667-TC
Document 1
Filed 08/17/16
Page 4 of 7
Approved Graphic Design, LLC is a South Carolina Limited Liability Company with
Approved Graphic Design, LLC markets products nationally and does business nationally
taking orders for Double Deeks, LLC, manufacturing, marking products with the infringing
DOUBLE DEEKS mark, packaging and shipping ordered product to customers, including to
customers in Oregon.
Plaintiff openly markets and sells duck hunting decoys under the DEEKS registered
and sell duck hunting decoys under the confusingly similar name DOUBLE DEEKS.
19.
Defendants products each bear the confusingly similar and infringing mark DOUBLE
DEEKS.
20.
Defendants use their infringing name with knowledge of ISAs product and openly admit
to naming the product after the original DEEKS product, citing in publications the name came
from a principals father telling him, Hey Son, throw those DEEKS in the boat and lets go.
22.
Defendant Double Deeks, LLC openly markets and promotes duck decoys with the
infringing DOUBLE DEEKS name though its web page, at tradeshows, and through commercial
advertising including radio and other media, including the web page of www.doubledeeks.com.
COMPLAINT
Page 4 of 7
CROWELL LAW
WWW.CROWELL-LAW.COM
Case 6:16-cv-01667-TC
23.
Document 1
Filed 08/17/16
Page 5 of 7
For online sales, defendant Double Deeks, LLC refers parties to Approved Graphic
Designs, LLC, an affiliate of Double Deeks, LLC which handles manufacturing, packaging and
product fulfillment with a web page of: www.approvedgraphics.com.
24.
On information and belief, Approved Graphic Designs, LLC prints duck decoys and
packaging with the infringing DOUBLE DEEKS mark and packages and sells the products to
customers.
25.
On information and belief, payment for infringing DOUBLE DEEKS products is made to
approvedgraphics.com domain.
27.
On information and belief, Approved Graphic Designs, LLC or its ownership is an active
FIRST CLAIM
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
28.
29.
confusingly similar copy of the DEEKS mark in connection with hunting decoys in direct
competition with ISA.
30.
Defendants use of the infringing DOUBLE DEEKS mark is in commerce within the
Defendants use of the infringing DOUBLE DEEKS mark is likely to cause confusion, or
to cause mistake, or to deceive customers into believing that the defendants goods originated
COMPLAINT
Page 5 of 7
CROWELL LAW
WWW.CROWELL-LAW.COM
Case 6:16-cv-01667-TC
Document 1
Filed 08/17/16
Page 6 of 7
from, were being provided with the authorization of ISA, and bore the hallmarks of quality and
origin associated with the original DEEKS marked goods.
32.
The acts of defendants were willful and with knowledge of ISAs proper ownership of the
DEEKS mark.
34.
Unless enjoined by the court, the defendants infringing activities as described above may
ISA has been damaged and seeks actual or statutory damages as proof may warrant
COMPLAINT
Page 6 of 7
CROWELL LAW
WWW.CROWELL-LAW.COM
Case 6:16-cv-01667-TC
Document 1
Filed 08/17/16
Page 7 of 7
COMPLAINT
Page 7 of 7
CROWELL LAW
WWW.CROWELL-LAW.COM