Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
I. INTRODUCTION
As Internet is the main information database, cellular
technology is required to merge with the core Internet
structure, with all its bandwidth and fast trafficking facility in
the cheapest way possible. This has been the fundamental
premise behind the development of LTE; the last step towards
the 4th generation of cellular networks that gained widespread
attention due to its high data rates and improved Quality of
Service (QoS), LTE determines goals peak data rate for
Downlink (DL) 100 Mbps and Uplink (UL) data rate for
50Mbps, increased cell edge, user throughput, improved
spectral efficiency and scalable bandwidth 1.4 MHz to 20
MHz, the presence of such innovative features for LTE finds
minimum amount of requirements for voice calls that it became
difficult to be waived, these requirements like:
Port numbers
Type of Service (ToS) / Differentiated Services Code
Point (DSCP) values
Source/Destination address
Protocol (TCP/UDP)
III. VOLTE PRINCIPLES VS OTT VOIP
The IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) network is the master
controller for VoLTE calls on an LTE network, it is IMS that
recognizes the need for special network conditions required to
support voice traffic. The LTE network takes instruction from
the IMS network using the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) to
establish the desired QoS environment and initiates the VoLTE
call, it also notifies LTE when the call has completed, and
directs LTE to tear down the special voice environment [3].
[4]
B. VoLTE
LTE networks with VoLTE implementation have two
default bearers and one dedicated bearer, each default bearer
has its own IP address and attached to a Packet Data Network
(PDN), default bearer #1 is attached to the IMS network for
IMS signaling and default bearer #2 is attached to any internet
network (including public Internet) for applications like
browsing, chatting, email, etc. While the dedicated bearer is for
carrying the VoLTE traffic and it does not need particular IP
address since it is linked to a default bearer (default bearer #1).
Table I shows list of different VoLTE bearers and related
specifications.
TABLE I.
Property
Default #1
Default #2
Dedicated
Carried
data
All other
internet traffic
IP address
specific address
specific address
QCI value
VoLTE
traffic
linked to
Default #1
1
Priority
Max.
delay (ms)
packet
loss (%)
100
300
100
10-6
10-6
10-2
C. OTT VOIP
OTT refers to services provided independently by 3rd party
over the mobile operators services, like Skype, Viber and
Google Talk, etc. Many OTT applications that support VoIP
also include rich communication features, such as instant
messaging, file sharing, and video calls.
OTT VOIP over LTE handling and treatment is based on
both LTE network and the generic IP network (The Public
Internet). Where in LTE the OTT VOIP over LTE data streams
are not differentiated from other IP data traffic, both are carried
over the default bearer according to 3GPP [5], therefore all
OTT applications do not offer QoS because the same pipe is
used for real-time voice/video communication as is used for
web browsing, file downloading/ uploading and audio/video
streaming, etc., hence it is treated like any other type of data
packet, and treated as best effort, meaning that your voice
packet doesnt have any special advantage over any other
packets; there is no dedicated bandwidth nor priority,
accordingly there is no limits for QoS parameters like delay,
jitter, and packet loss (do not have strict QoS constraints). In
addition to LTE network there is the public Internet negative
impact, since OTT VoIP calls may have to be routed via Packet
Gateway (PGW) to the public Internet, Making these
parameters getting worse while contacting the VOIP service
providers infrastructure specially for signaling.
Although LTE network operators can create natural
convenience for the development of OTT VOIP calls and
break almost all the barriers, by using its features like broad
bandwidth, low latency, being always-online [6], even if it was
applied, the QoS of the public Internet will remain then
nonguaranteed.
IV.
SIMULATION
Since both VoLTE and OTT VOIP are VOIP packets, this
was the main motivation behind what previously handled from
clarification for the technical difference between both of them
and nothing was left but evaluating the performance for each of
them.
As more and more subscribers use voice service over LTE,
the voice traffic volume increases, and this may in turn lower
down the voice call quality; therefore a major need to predict
the voice call quality during network congestion using different
voice services appears.
This section includes some highlights of VoLTE
performance compared with OTT VoIP in presence of
simulation graphs based on simulation results for QoS
parameters like End-to-End Delay, Packet Delay Variation
(PDV), Jitter, Packet Loss (PL) in addition to Mean Opinion
Score (MOS), all using OPNET 17.5 simulation tool.
According to 3GPP in case of VoLTE, it is mandatory to
use at least voice codecs of Adaptive Multi-Rate Narrow Band
(AMR-NB) family, but Since the perceived voice quality
depends on the audio codec used and End-to-End Delay, as
well as transmission impairments such as jitter, Packet Delay
Variation (PDV) and packet loss, and since this study is only
focused on the QoS parameters, therefore in VoLTE and OTT
VOIP simulation the same voice codec is used, and since
G.711 codec is one of the most public VOIP codecs used in the
market, so it will be assigned for both VoLTE and OTT VOIP
as well.
A. Network Topology in OPNET
LTE network is built in OPNET 17.5 as following:
Node
UE
Attribute
Value
-1 dBi
28
Free space
Receiver Sensitivity
-200dBm
Number of Rx Antennas
Number of Tx Antennas
15 dBi
1.4 MHZ
FDD
Spatial
Multiplexing
2 Codewords
2 Layers
PHY Profile
MIMO Transmission
Technique
eNodeB
Number of Rx Antennas
Operating Power
20
Receiver Sensitivity
-200dBm
No Link
Adaptation
Scheduling Mode
TABLE III.
Number of Tx Antennas
(a)
(b)
Link
Type
eNodeB- EPC
PPP_DS1
EPC - Edge_router_1
EPC - Edge_router_2
Internet - FTP Server
Internet - SIP Proxy Server
Edge_router_2 - Internet
Edge_router_2 (P/I/S-CSCF)
1000BaseX
V.
(c)
(d)
SIMULATION
RESULTS
Acceptable
Poor
0-150
150-300
>300
node. VOIP Quality regions versus the Jitter values are given
in Table IV below [8]. The Jitter graph is shown in fig. 6; the
Jitter for VoLTE and OTT VOIP as well has a good results.
Which all are less than 20 msec, therefore lying in the Good
VOIP Quality.
TABLE V.
VOIP
Quality
Good
Acceptable
Poor
Jitter
(ms)
0-20
20-50
>50
In contrast the End to End delay for OTT VOIP lies in the
Acceptable Quality VOIP region in scenario 1 only (0.152
sec) while the other three scenarios lie in the Poor Quality
VOIP region with values 0.652, 1.632, 3.13 sec for scenarios
2, 3 ,4 respectively.
2) Packet Delay Variation (PDV):
This parameter gives measures the variance among End to End
delays for voice packets. In all simulations, the aggregate
mean PDV values for all the users in the network in each
scenario is considered, as shown in the graph in fig. 5 the PDV
for VoLTE has almost the same value for scenario 1 where the
value is [0.0001sec] and scenario 2 where the value is
[0.0003sec] with slight increase in scenario 3 to be [0.015sec]
but in scenario 4 the value is severe [1.845sec]. On the other
hand the PDV values for OTT VOIP are very severe with
values 0.961, 0.652, 1.632, 3.13 sec for scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4
respectively.
3) Jitter:
Jitter definition is different from PDV definition and can
be defined as if two consecutive packets leave the source node
with time stamps t1 & t2 and are played back at the
destination node at time t3 & t4, then: Jitter = (t4 - t3)-(t2 t1)
negative jitter indicates that the time difference between the
packets at the destination node was less than that at the source
MOS value
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Bad
Acceptable
Poor
0-0.5%
0.5%-1.5%
>1.5%
VI.
CONCLUSION
This paper provided a simulation platform to evaluate endto-end QoS of both VoLTE and OTT VOIP based on OPNET
Modeler. First case of simulation focused on the impact of
congestion on the performance of VoLTE compared with OTT
VOIP, four different scenarios that represent four different
congestion levels are considered, the simulation graphs in this
case showed the superiority of performance of VoLTE on OTT
VOIP to overcome the congestion state to a great extent.