Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
In
some
empirical research,
essential
it is a convention to set
out
as
framework
made
to
straighten
out these
preliminaries
so
that
the
We
concepts
describe below,
used
in
in reasonable detail,
the
procedures
the various
followed
for
The
household.
preferred
are
but
as
the
unit
of
elderly
analysis
system
basic
household
because
consumption,
well.
been
unit
of
income
as
economic decisions
there is generally
no
although
some
matters.
The
capacity
77
The Household
The
defined
as
normally
study
kitchen.
Any
person,
sharing
his
the
principal meals
is
are
same
with
the
household for more than six months during the reference year
has
a relation,
whose
'Muklawa'
take
only
those
minimum
their
households
The married
household
members 1 .
not
Further,
where
the
or
households,
sex.
per
capita
Due
to
size
variations
of
different
to
of
ensure
area or
contribution
non-farm
1.
employment.
While
the
labour
contributed
by
the
78
students has been included in the total mandays of employment
a particular operation,
in
fact,
the year.
of
Labour quality
the
ideal
attributes
cognizance
of
such
Unluckily,
based
always
The aspect
of
days
woman-day
have
taking
to
one
0~5
man-day 2
2.
79
Total Yearly Employment I Earnings
The
Each
viz.
The
three
split
sub-components
in
on-farm and
sub-components.
employment
as used
of
non-wage (self)
into
on-farm
employment
and dairying and poultry; while rural wage employment, urban wage
employment
and
sub-components
employment
accruing
of
has
non-farm
employment.
Earning
from
the
per
total
total
three
day
of
earnings
mandays
of
Wage
constituent
employment/earnings
of
contributed
by
is
dominant
most
It
is
either
as
employment/earnings.
members
household
the
while
working
in
on-farm
transplanation,
activities
weeding,
such
harvesting
as
and
ploughing,
thre~hing
sowing
and
and
other
employment
80
etc.)
well
as
the
farm
prevailing
money
prices
of
the
relevant
commodities
wherever
by
areas.
The
reported,
has
concept
preceding paragraph,
mentioned
in
the
In Bihar, the
derived
from
the
cultivation of such a
earlier.
obtained
Net
by
Conceptually, net
tiny
constituents of
wage
income,
reported
the
cost of
fertilizers,
standard
inputs
on
seeds,
maintenance
of
that of by-products).
is
expenditure
(including
plot
irrigation,
been
such
repair
of
as
and
output
as
81
land
and
owned-land,
etc.
remains
of
element
of cost,
an
additional
Another
and
employment
activities.
This
variety
of
The cattle
stock
of
mainly
It
needs
of
to
be
head
is
net
into
etc.
the
information
on
this
account
could
not
be
since
concrete
conveyed
by
the
respondent households.
Non-Farm Employment/Earnings
All
reported
avenues
earlier
under
of employment/earnings other
the three
on-farm
than
sub-components
Such
those
are
employment
82
avenues
employment
although
in
same
cases,
self-employment
wage
is
also
availed of.
The
both
of
wage
households
is
some
others
get
wage-employment
as
nearby
the
arising
stratified
under
from
two
heads,
Employment.
While
viz,
be~n
around
industrial
town.
or
watch-men~etc.
construction workers,
urban
available
etc.,
or
in the
studying
the
employment/earnings
and
studied
Urban
Wage
in
This
includes
mandays
of
employment/earnings
artisans
weaver,
etc.,
(ii)
service
dyer,
personnel such as
washerman,
sweet
barber,
maker,
cobbler,
cartage,
sweeper,
and
other
83
traditional
loudspeaker
and
bandmaster, etc.,
(i i i )
spinning,
petty
butcher,
shopkeeper,
vegetable selling,
broom
household
fisherman, rickshaw
selling,
goldsmith,
engine
The
present
study,
concept
of
emanates
in
the
the
wage
household
of leased - in land,
activities.
net
earnings
areas)
wage-receipt
(non-
household
84
Consumption Expenditure
In
the
sample
namely
households
food-items
cereals
(wheat,
intoxicants
ther
non-food
items.
sets
of
Expenditure
items:
made
of
on
products,
refreshments,
and
pan,
etc.)
khaini,
cigarette,
food-items.
On
the
bedding,
footwear,
education,
furnitures,
utensils,
(covering
expenditure
charges,
laundary
and
miscellaneous goods
on cinema and
and
toiletry,
other
etc.)
and
services
amusements,
has
been
barber
trated
as
though studied
separately
is
total
consumption
expenditure
of
kind)
the
sample
components.
For cash component, while the sample households have to rely upon
market purchases,
although
home-grown
production
also
makes
(tea,
a
meals,
marginal
8.5
contribution.
valued
The
value
It is worthwhile
are
out
pointi~g
and,
of the household.
as such,
other
however,
the
to
heading.
been
One
that
of
debate
approaches
approach
some
poverty
that
have
defines
has
come
revolved around
into
the
this
limelight.
cut-off
As a result of
issue,
While
is
to purchase a
two
the
main
first
level
or
socially
3.
and proteins to
86
4
in the working condition .
points
poverty
fact
points
that
if
have
been
cut-
for
to
the
estimating
reaching
measurement,
scrutiny
few
suggested
on
careful
points
of time.
method
of
for
measuring
poverty,
We
also
monthly
expenditure
of
Rs.
Accordingly,
15.00 at 1960-61
per
all-India
capita
rural
prices has been taken as the cut-off point for the present study.
Further,
differentials,
the
price
4.
5.
Pranab K. Bardhan,
(1973); "On the Incidence of Poverty in
Rural India of the Sixties", Economic and Political Weekly,
Vol. VIII, Nos. 4-6, Annual Number, February, pp. 245-254.
87
prices
for
Rs.15.90
rural
and
Punjab
Rs.15.80 respectively
at
been
worked
out
.
6
pr1ces .
1960-61
at
The
corresponding yearly figures for rural Punjab and rural Bihar are
Rs.190.80 and Rs. 189.60 respectively.
To
arrive
Consumer
Price
country,
index
on a regular basis.
numbers
working
Labourers
Moreover,
the
is
the
these
problem
of
easily
finally
worked
out
which
resolved.
are
have
the
of
problem
income
for
respectively.
on
the
of
the
income
and
pattern
consumption
of
Punjab
Bihar,
and
a comparative analysis
households
terms
of
of
seeking
6.
7.
88
empirical
have
present
for
is
For
addition
presented
for
most
distance
side
Still further,
of
included
of positive
to
in
more
values
those
mean
Further,
have
analysis
the
responses
is low.
percentages
are
purpose, mean
thi~
study.
very
These hypotheses
also
been
meaningful.
study,
the
effect
of
is
'
y.
Where 'Y .1
1
cross-sectionally
o( +
ft D.J
i th
variable
observed
the
effect
intercept
indicating
the
or is
zero.
To
diff~rent
study
ii~ms.
the consumption
pattern,
mean
value~
'higher
for
income
households
generally
consume
literature
smaller
distanced
households',
equally
Further,
we have
individual
Besides,
for
co-efficient
of
Punjab-Bihar
Conventionally,
different
B.
useful
components
been
labour
consumption.
highly
well
have
be
The
elasticities
to
of
Further,
pattern
we
for
estimated
households,
for
different
looking
into
the
expenditure
items.
of
considered
significance
of
of
90
any
set
ceteris
of households.
paribus
consumer
In most
studies
behaviour,
the
almost
conducted
theories
so far in the
field
of
consumer
ceteris
paribus
unimpdrtant
in
framewrok
affecting
possibly
the
all
of
empirical
framework,
in
due
consumption
to
of
their
in
being
particular
prices,
income,
Assuming that
which,
in turn,
conforms to some
probability
the
mathematical
0 ik
of
form.
writt~n
in
Qjk
Symbolically,
fl (Yk' pl p2' p3'' ... ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' .Pn' Rik)
Rik is
f1
shows
Again,
P 3 .. Pn
random
the
variable;
and
functional relationship.
in the above
P1 , P ,
2
and on the other,
type
level of income:
of relationship between
quantity
consumed
and
91
is quantity consumed,
shows
function,
(Y).
as
stated
above,
assumes
different
and
space
Engel
This
1' 2'
Curve.
The
following
important
algebraic
forms
of
Engel
Algebraic Form
Function Type
----------------------------------------------------------------1
2
3
q = ,a + b X
Linear
2
a+
llt X + c X
q =
Quadratic
q = a - b;x
Hyperbolic
q = a + b. log X
Semi-log
Log-inverse
Log
q = a - b. 1/X
Log
q = a + b log X
Log
q = a + b log X
Log q =
Where;
the
'ql
total
c.1/X
Log-log-inverse
Log
Log
linear
quadratic
'2).1
XI
is
is
the
92
It
is
important
/expenditure elasticities,
tried
by
different
to
note
that
t.o
estimate
research
workers.
However,
out
of
the
the relevance of
income
several
statistical,
considerations.
economic
and
other
by
theoretical
it is obvious that
th~
has
Likewise,
it
merits
and
its
On
the contrary,
formulations
others,
we
over
limitations.
itself
relative
extensively
bold
others.
The
are
Engel
decision to estimate
all
posed
the
by
eight
for
diffe~ent
commodity groups.
In
'regressand'
'regressor'.
Such
and
bivariate
general
X'
as is well
as
the
known,
93
imply
as
regards
other
words,
neutrality
consumption.
commodity
total
In
expenditure
the
by
economies
assuming
scale
of
that
per
in
capita
level
of
hypothesis),
an
the
wide
total
as
well
as
number
of
exp-
we obtained as many as
'X~
(Please see
Secondly, by using
the
and'X'.
we transformed the
suggested
by
Box
running
the
weighted
regressions.
As
functions.
9.
said
earlier,
we
have
used
types
of
En~~"..:.'
G.E.P.
Box
and D.R.Cox (1964),
" An
Analysis
of
Transformation", Journal Q...!_ the Royal Statistical Society,
Series B, pp. 211-243.
94
made
by
other considerations.
statistical,
In this regard,
economic
the following
and
procedure
r ad j us t e d c 0 e f f i c i en t
regression
coefficients
have
the
been
functional
main
forms.
dismissed
at
or
q~o.
stastically
correlation
such
for
narrowing
functions
or both are
of
of
regression
statistically
confidence
have
been
owing
has
having
to
high
also
been
and
Functions qualifying
choice
which
not
significance
our
for
p r 0 per s i g n s
non-significant
between
dropped by us.
statistical
or 2 )
is obviously useless.
one
f de t e r mi n a t i 0 n
criteria
All
parameter/parameters
significant
(R 2 ),
Even
with
correlation
rigorous
95
application
of
the
above
criteria,
we
functional
selection,
other
considerations
economic theory,
such as.
were
left
with
For making a
their
2-3
final
conforming
to
into account.
Finally,
terms
of
we
households
below
the
poverty line in
terms
proportion
of
income
in
of
norms
Symbolically,
m
p =
Where;
'P'
measures
the
proportion of households
below
number
'm'
the
is
the
obvious
reasons,
ratio
is
order
service
11.
we
have
pressed
11
to work
into
out
the
intensity
of
poverty in the
two
study
Although
areas.
Sen
himself
disaggregated,
modified
and
others,
household
thanks
to
the
availability
the
of
following
us the
best;-
Erit.
. ,, ,./
= ------------
(q + 1) n
i=1
Ci-Y.)
1
(q-i
+ 1)
Where;
'P,s' is Sen's measure of the intensity of poverty,
the
population
arranged
in
size,
'n'
the income of
the
i th
individual
'q'
the
number
'Yi'
of
people at or below the poverty line and 'Z' the poverty level 'per
capita income.
We
alternative
have
manner.
By
taking
into
account
the
in
an
percentage
distribution of the
per
income,
levels