Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
SPE 35600
High-Quality Foam Fracturing Fluids
Phillip
C. Harris
and Stanley
J. Heath,
Halliburton
Energy
Services
Foam
This papar was prepared for presentatmn at the SPE Gas Technology Sympowum held In
Calgafy Albena, Canada, April 28. May 1, 1996.
Thm Papef was selecmd fof presentation by an SPE Program Committee following review of
reformation contamad m an abstract submmed by the author(s). Contanls of the paper, as
presented, have not been reviewed by the Scciety of Petroleum Engmews and are subloct to
correction by the author(s). The material, as presentti,
.dwJs not necessarily reflect any
posmon of the SO.361y of Patroleum Engme8rs. its 0fflC019. 01 members. Papers presented at
SPE meelmgs are subject to publication rewew by Edltcmal Committees oi the Society of
Petroleum Engineers Permission to cow is restricted to an abstract of not mom than 3C0
words. Illustrations may not be copied. The abslract should con lam conspmuous acknowlodg mem of where and by Mom the papw was presented Write L!brarian, SPE, P O Box 633836,
Richardson, TX 75083.3836, U,S.A, tax 01.214.952-9435.
Abstract
A recent research project was conducted to determine whether
a stable, fine-textured, gs~o gas content foam could be made.
The viscosities of 95-quality NJ foams were measured in a
recirculating flow loop viscometer.
Only foam prepared from 2% of an anionic surfactant with
plain water had uniform, fine-bubble structure (texture) at 95
quality. All other combinations of additives or other foamers
(nonionic, amphoteric or anionic, and/or 0.24% guar) produced
unstable foams at 95 quality and stable foams at lower quality.
Foams that were unstable at 95 quality
typically
at nitrogen
qualitles
----
Experimental
Base liquids consisted of either tap water or O.24% guar polymer
in tap water. Foaming agent was mixed into the base fluid at a
concentration of 2% (by volume) unless otherwise noted. Liquid
phase composition and foamer types are listed in Table 1. The
foamer surfactants that were tested are typical of commercial
materials used in foam fracturing service work; two anionics,
one nonionic, and one amphoteric were tested. Anionic surfactant number one was used for all experiments except where
noted.
The base liquid was pumped into the recirculating flow loop
viscometers and pressurized to 1,000 psi. Nitrogen gas was bled
into the pipeline loop while the loop was being recirculated at
1,000 see.To generate 95-quality N*foam, Nz was pumped into
the loop, displacing 613 mL of liquid from the 645-mL volume
of the loop through a backpressure regulator. Liquid displacement was measured by trapping the effluent in a beaker on a
digital balance. When gas was added, viscosity was monitored
and foam was observed through the visual port for the appearance of large gas bubbles. The nitrogen quality shown in Figures
1 through 4 was calculated from specific gravit y readings of the
contained
slugs of N, gas within the foam structure. Unstable, highquality foams did not invert phases to forma mist. Instead, such
foams were mixtures of very small and very large bubbles. The
net viscosity and stability of those fluid systems were lower than
that of a uniform, fine-textured foam.
Yield points were measured for fine-textured foams at 70 to
95 quality. These new yield points were higher than yield points
in earlier da[a.
large
Introduction
Foam fracmring is a standard technique used in North America
to stimulate low-permeability reservoirs, including shales and
coal seams. Foams are attractive because the water content of a
foam fluid is very small, reducing the damage potential to
sensitive formations. A foam fluid consists of a high percentage
of a gas-internal phase and a lesser percentage of a liquidexternal phase that includes a stabilizing surfactant called a
foaming agent. Foams are viscous fluids used for creating
fracture geometry and transporting proppant into the fractures.
.. .
been apphed
effectively in the formation types mentioned above. Alternatively, even pure N* without proppant will stimulate gas production from these low-permeability formations in some areas.z~
Liquid CO1 with a small concentration of proppant has also been
reported to stimulate gas production.4
One way to minimize the amount of water injected is to use
a foam quality higher than 90. Although the water content of a
90-quality foam is only 10%, 95- or higher quality foam contains even less water (5%). The danger of increasing the quality
is that at some point the liquid will stretch to cover so much
surface area of bubbles that the foam may collapse or even invert
phases to become a mist. Assuming sufficient foam stability, 95quality foam has enough viscosity to place proppant.
This paper shows the requirements for building high-quality (95% gas content) foam fracturing fluids. The effects of
external phase composition, foaming agent type and concentration, shear rate history, and gas type (Nz and C07) on viscosity
development were examined in the study.
265
HIGH-QUALITY
FOAM FRACTURING
FLUIDS
SPE 35600
Polymer Foams
Figure 3 shows the buildup of polymer foam created by adding
Nz to a base liquid containing ().zA~o guar polymer and an
anionic surfactant.
A fine-textured foam was developed up to nearly 90 quality,
but there was poor incorporation of gas above 90 quality. The
95-quality foam actually had less viscosity than the 90-quality
foam, indicating some breakdown of texture. Adding a gelling
agent to a foam fluid usually causes an increase in viscosity of
the foam fluid, and this was the case in these tests up to 90
quality. However, increasing viscosity of the aqueous phase
also retards diffusion of surfactant, not allowing fresh surfaces
to be stabilized during high shear circulation. High shear rates
promote foam breakdown. The quality/shear interaction was
different for various surfactants, and about 90 quality at 1,000
see-] appeared to be the limit for this specific system. The
nonequilibrated viscosity above 90 quality was about the same
as for the anionic foamer/water system.
Figure 4 shows the effect of replacing the anionic surfactant
with a different foaming agent, either anionic or amphoteric.
Both of these foaming agents were less efficient stabilizers than
the original anionic surfactant because large gas slugs began to
appear at lower qualities, resulting in poorer textures. All three
of these chemicals had equally good viscosity performance up
to about 75 quality, in the range that conventional foam fracturing treatments are performed. These data indicate that it cannot
be predicted which foamers will stabilize very high-quality
foams based on tests done at a lower quality.
Surfactants intended for different purposes, such as a foaming agent and a non-emulsifier, are often mixed together in a
fracturing fluid. When 0.570 of the nonionic surfactant was
mixed together with 2%0of Anionic Number 1, instability was
observed at high quality and high shear rates.
Foam Rheology
Previously published correlations for equilibrated aqueous foams
up to 80 quality were based on the observation that the power
law index, n, was the same for the foam as for the neat liquid
phase (water has an n value of 1.0), so water foam should have
a limiting value ofn=1.Oat high shear rates. Similarly, n values
for base gels tended to be the same as for foams made from those
base gel fluids. The n values of the fine-textured foams were
much lower than expected. As shown in Table 3 and Figure 5,
266
SPE 35600
the n value (determined from slope limit at high shear rate) for
a 70-or lower quality foam maybe near unity, but higher quality
foams had decreasing values of n.
The smaller nvalues may have been caused by higher-thannormal surfactant concentration. Normal low-quality foams
require only about 0.2 to 0.5% foaming agent with little effect
on the properties of the external liquid phase. High-quality
foams require much higher surfactant concentrations. As the
Iamella become much thinner with increasing surface area, free
liquid in the foam becomes scarce, and the properties of that free
liquid are strongly influenced by the relatively high concentration of surfactant. A 2% surfactant concentration approaches the
range in which gel-like properties appear for some surfactant
types. This association phenomenon may be occurring in highquality foams, causing a reduction in n values.
Yield points became increasingly large as quality increased.
It was estimated that the yield points of the high surfactant
concentration water foams graphically by extrapolation of the
linear plots in Figure 6.
The estimated values listed in Table 3 were compared to
previous work, and viscosity values were also calculated. Yield
points were found to be similar for 70-to 75-quality foams but
were substantially higher at 80 to 95 quality with 2~0 surfactant
present.
Rheograms were also measured for equilibrated foams of
70 to 95 quality containing 0.24% guar as the external phase.
The viscosity measurements agree reasonably well with 70- to
80-quality foams calculated from FOAMVISCS (with input n =
0.671 and K = 0.00176). (See Table 4.) At 85 to 95 quality, the
equations overpredict, perhaps because of some texture breakdown in the actual foam. For90- and 95-quality foams, the water
foams had higher viscosities than the foams containing 0.24%
guar.
Rheograms measured at 120F had characteristics similar to
the 80F rheograms but with slightly lower viscosity caused by
temperature thinning (Figure 7).
Nomenclature
K = consistency index, lbf-sec/ftz
n = flow-behavior index
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Halliburton Energy Services
management for the opportunity to present this work.
Bibliography
1. Ha~isi P~C.: Application of Foam Fluids to Minimize
Damage During Fracturing, paper SPE 22394 presented at
the 1992 International Meeting of Petroleum Engineering,
Beijing, China, March 24-27.
2. Freeman, E. R., et al.: A Stimulation Technique Using
Only Nitrogen, paper SPE 10129 presented at the 1981
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San
Antonio, TX Ott 5-7.
3. Goftschling, J.: Nitrogen Gas Most Effective Where Natural Fracture Density Is High, Northeast Oil Reporter (Feb.
1983) 57-59.
4. King, S. R.: Liquid C02 for the Stimulation of Low Permeability Reservoirs, paper SPE/DOE 1 I616 presented at the
1983 Symposium on Low Permeability, Denver, March 1416.
5. Harris, P. C.: A Comparison of Mixed Gas Foams with N~
and COq Foam Fracturing Fluids on a Flow Loop Viscometer, SPE Production and Faciiities(Aug. 1995) 197-202.
6. Harris, PC.: Effects of Texture on Rheology of Foam
Fracturing Fluids, SPE Production Engr. (Aug. 1989)
249-257.
7. Harris, P.C. and Reidenbach, V.G.: High-Temperature
Theological Study of Foam Fracturing Fluids, JPT (May
1987) 613-619.
C02 Foams
For comparison, high-quality CO1 water foams were generated
(Figure 8 and Table 6).
COZfoams were less viscous than Nz foams, as predicted by
the FOAMVISC program. Although some decrease was noted
in the n value, the effect was not as strong for COZ foams as for
N2foams. Estimates of yield points are reasonably close to those
determined in previous experiments.
Conclusions
High-viscosity, fine-textured Nz and COZ foams were produced
with 27Qanionic surfactant in water at 95?10gas quality. These
foams were stable under both static and high shear conditions.
The addition of gelling agents to the aqueous phase reduced
the maximum quality for which a fine-textured foam could be
achieved.
267
HIGH-QUALITY
Table I-stabilhv
Figure
Liquid-Phaae
Number
FOAM FRACTURING
FLUIDS
SPE 35600
Composition
Viscosity (cp) at
, ~
s=.,
viscosity
Highest Qllldity
with Fine Texture
95% Nz
90% N2
2?4.Anionic l/vVater
95
80
52
1% Anionic 1/Water
94
58
44
95
66
46
2% NonionicAVater
78
20
33
Nonionic/Water
3?0
81
20
32
2% Anionic l/Guar
89
64
94
2% Amphoteric/Guar
85
68
75
2% Anionic 2/Guar
75
51
52
66
80
72
lSpeclfic Grsvity
90
95
10.17
10.12
Table 3-Rheology
Nz Quallty
viscosity (Cp)
Estimated
viscosity (Cp)
st 170 aec
Yield Point
St 170 Ssc-
FOAMVISC
Yield Point
69.3
0.728
0.00187
22.1
0.03
35.0
0.044
75.3
0.538
0.01366
60.3
0.06
48.6
0.068
80.0
0.392
0.05136
108
0.23
68.1
0.107
84.8
0.333
0.08602
134
0.32
96.7
0.168
90.1
0.241
0.2371
230
0.59
138.6
0.264
95.3
0.249
0.2869
290
0,88
200.6
0.413
268
(Cp) at
1,Ooa sac-
SPE 35600
Table 4-Rheology
Vlscoslty
at, ,0 ~=.,
st 170 see-f
Nz Quality
I K
Cp
Cp
[118
[68.7
]0.512
10,02644
1103
75.8
0.451
10.05182
148
80.8
0.457
0.06069
178
195
85.0
0,407
0.0939
214
258
1150
90.8
0.363
0.1252
228
350
94.3
10.306
10.1671
1227
1486
Table 5-Rheology
of Equilibrated
at 120F and 1,000 psi
Wacosity
(Cp)
Composition
N2 Quallty
Anionic VIVater
95
0.238
0.2493
238
Anionic l/Guar
95
0.387
0.08668
178
power aw egression
n
Foams
Table 6-Rheology
I
et 170 see-l
~
et 170 see-l
I
#
26,3
10.013
10,020
Viscosity (CP)
n
lK
FOAMVISC
Yield Point
I
112.4
I
10,005
0.00052
16.7
0.010
,W,9
0.00145
28.7
0.020
0.760
0.00280
39.2
0.025
0.664
0.00715
61.1
0.07
0.552
0.02082
99.9
0.14
H!H
69.6
11,036
10.00022
75.2
0,942
80.2
0.828
85.1
90.4
95.0
269
117.3
10.117
HIGH-QUALITY
100
90
FOAM FRACTURING
FLUIDS
SPE 35600
1
2.0%
T
3
8.
80
70
1.5%
X
60
z
z
50
.@
~
:
~
1.0%
40
30
E
5 20
LL
10
$
0
0
Figure l-Effect
20
40
60
Nitrogen Quality (%)
80
100
3.0%
20
40
60
of nonlonlc eurfactant
270
80
100
SPE 35600
Water
10
l
0
20
40
60
80
100
I
0
20
40
60
of various aurfactanta
in 0.24%
guar
271
80
100
HIGH-QUALITY
FOAM FRACTURING
SPE 35600
FLUIDS
10.00
1.00
11111
I
0.10
iI
I,
M+r
I
./
/ , ~111
1 1 1 I 11I
1
A ~
1
1
T { \
100
10
I I
I
I
I
\
I 11
10,000
1,000
95,3Y.
1.6
1.4
90.1 Ye
1.2
84.8%
80.0%
75.3%
0.4
-..
,-- . .
...-.
0.2
.*
___
0.0
0
Figure 6+J2/water
..--
--
.H
,
200
----
----
69.3%
----
..-
----
------
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
SPE 35600
.. .. ..
-
1.8
80F
1.6
1.4
120
g
12
=
@ 1.0.
f
z
0.8
a
# 0.6
Ua
0.4
0.2
0.0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1.0
95.()%
0.9
0.8
e
%
~
90.40/.
0.7
0.6
85.1 %
@if 0,5
g
80.2?/0
$ 0.4
ar
75.2V0
69,6%
o.~
0.2
./0,0
200
400
600
800
273
(
1,000
1
1,200