Sunteți pe pagina 1din 69

Suramadu Bridge, Indonesia

Approach Bridge

CALCULATIONS
Vol I: Static Analysis

Consortium of Chinese Contractors


CCCC Highway & Bridge Consultants Co., Ltd
November, 2006

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations

CONTENTS
1

Longitudinal Calculation of Continuous Box Girder ....................................1

1.1 Technical Specifications ............................................................................................................1


1.2 Longitudinal Static Analysis......................................................................................................1
1.2.1 Arrangement of spans.......................................................................................................1
1.2.2 Calculation contents and load combinations ...................................................................1
1.3 Brief introduction of the calculating method ............................................................................2
1.4 Beam elements partition chart...................................................................................................2
1.5 Calculation step .........................................................................................................................3
1.6 Calculation Result .....................................................................................................................6
1.6.1 Sign specification .............................................................................................................6
1.6.2 Result of normal stress of box girder................................................................................7
1.6.3 Result of principal stress of box girder.............................................................................9
1.6.4 Checking longitudinal rigidity of box girder.................................................................. 11
1.6.5 Checking bearing capacity of box girder ....................................................................... 11

Calculation of Pile Cap....................................................................................13

2.1 Pile cap P37~40, P43~44, P49~50, and P53~56.....................................................................13


2.1.1 General...........................................................................................................................13
2.1.2 Calculation method ........................................................................................................13
2.1.3 Calculation result ...........................................................................................................14
2.2 Pile cap P41~42 and P51~52...................................................................................................15
2.2.1 General...........................................................................................................................15
2.2.2 Calculation result ...........................................................................................................16
2.3 Pile cap P45 and P48 ...............................................................................................................17
Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations
Volume I: Static Analysis

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
2.3.1 General...........................................................................................................................17
2.3.2 Calculation result ...........................................................................................................18

Calculation of Pile Foundation.......................................................................21

3.1 Parameters of Materials...........................................................................................................21


3.2 Combinations of Action...........................................................................................................21
3.3 Content and methods of Calculation .......................................................................................21
3.4 Actions on Top of Piles and Forces of Combination...............................................................22
3.4.1 Longitudinal actions at the top of piles ..........................................................................22
3.4.2 Combination of longitudinal actions the top of piles .....................................................25
3.4.3 Transverse actions at the top of piles .............................................................................28
3.4.4 Combination of transverse actions at the top of piles ....................................................31
3.5 Related Parameters ..................................................................................................................34
3.5.1 Levels of sea bed and scour depths ................................................................................34
3.5.2 Boring depths and parameters .......................................................................................35
3.5.3 Allowable bearing capacity of soil at pile base..............................................................41
3.6 Calculation of Length of Piles.................................................................................................42
3.6.1 Length of pile..................................................................................................................42
3.6.2 Check of bearing capacity at pile base ..........................................................................43
3.7 Internal Forces and Strength Capacity of Pile.........................................................................46
3.7.1 Piles of V-pier .................................................................................................................46
3.7.2 Piles of other piers .........................................................................................................46

Transverse Analysis of Box Girder ................................................................55

4.1 Check of Top Plate ..................................................................................................................55


4.1.1 Analysis model................................................................................................................55
4.1.2 Material ..........................................................................................................................55
Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations
Volume I: Static Analysis

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
4.1.3 Load................................................................................................................................55
4.1.4 Analysis results ...............................................................................................................56
4.1.5 Check of top plate...........................................................................................................57
4.2 Check of Bottom Plate ............................................................................................................61
4.2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................61
4.2.2 Analysis model................................................................................................................62
4.2.3 Analysis results ...............................................................................................................62
4.2.4 Check of bottom plate.....................................................................................................63
4.3 Counterweight Calculation at Bridge End...............................................................................63
4.3.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................63
4.3.2 Results of bearing reactions ...........................................................................................64
4.3.3 Check of bottom plate.....................................................................................................64

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
1

Longitudinal Calculation of Continuous Box Girder

1.1 Technical Specifications


1) Span arrangement: 40m+780m+40m prestressed continuous box girder bridge
2) Design running speed of vehicle: 80km/h
3) Width of bridge deck: dual running, the width of deck is 30m totally. Transverse
arrangement: 0.4m (side parapet) + 3.05m (pedestrian and motorcycle way) + 1.3m (side reserve)
+ 9.75m (carriageway) + 1m (central reserve) + 9.75m (carriageway) + 1.3m (side reserve) +
3.05m (pedestrian and motorcycle way) + 0.4m (side parapet);
4) Load standard
Vehicle load: Highway-I class in JTG D60-2004;
Load on motorcycle way: For integral structural analysis, p = 4.0kPa; for calculating
members directly acted by pedestrian load, p = 5.0kPa;
Maximum system temperature is taken to be 40.0C, and minimum system temperature is
taken to be 15.0C. Closure temperature is assumed to be 30.0C.

1.2 Longitudinal Static Analysis


1.2.1 Arrangement of spans
40+7*80+40m=640m prestressed continuous box girder

1.2.2 Calculation contents and load combinations


3 conditions are considered in calculation of superstructure of approach bridge.
(1) Elastic stress calculation for every section of box girder: Normal and primary stress are
both calculated. Characteristic value of each action are taken to use in the loads combination,
that is say, load factors are all 1.0.
(2) Calculation of service limit state: The longitudinal box girders elements are all
considered to be all prestressed concrete members. Deflection of girder is also calculated in SLS.
(3) Calculation of ultimate limit state: Calculating the bearing capacity of box girder
Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations
Volume I: Static Analysis

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
considering the effect of prestressed tendons and without regard to the reinforcements in
concrete.
Three primary combinations, as listed in Table 1.2.2, are taken into account in the
calculation. In the result, every factors are considered according to the specifications.
1.2.2 Load combinations
Load Comb

Actions
Permanent load + vehicle + pedestrian
Permanent load + vehicle + pedestrian + uniformly temperature
increase + gradient temperature

Permanent load + vehicle + pedestrian + uniformly temperature


decrease + gradient temperature Permanent

1.3 Brief introduction of the calculating method


Plan structural mechanics of beam system is applied to analyze the longitudinal box girder
of approach bridge and the box girder is divided into 194 beam elements. Calculation stages are
plotted according to the construction procedures of form traveler movements and balanced
cantilever construction method. Software QJX is used to analyze the longitudinal girder.

1.4 Beam elements partition chart


Total 205 elements are partitioned in the calculation model.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations

Figure 1.4 Element partition

1.5 Calculation step


According to assumed construction steps in the design documents, 71 calculation steps are
plotted in our calculation. Please refer to the follow Table 1.5.1.
Table 1.5.1 Calculation steps
Construction

Construction Calculation

Time

Accumulated

(day)

Time (day)

Descriptions
location

Item

Substructures

Piers

Step
1

Construct pile foundations

100

100

Construct piers

100

200

10

210

Cast A0 concrete and temporarily fasten


3
For all piers

pier and segment A0

Segment A0

First balancing
construction piers

A1

A2

Tension tendons T0

211

Install form traveler on A0

214

Cast concrete of segment A1

218

Tension tendons T1 and W1

219

Move form traveler from A0 to A1

221

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Construction

Construction Calculation

Time

Accumulated

(day)

Time (day)

Descriptions
location

Item

A3

A4

A5

A6

A7

A8

A10
Cast side span

Step
9

Cast concrete of segment A2

225

10

Tension tendons T2 and W2

226

11

Move form traveler from A1 to A2

228

12

Cast concrete of segment A3

232

13

Tension tendons T3 and W3

233

14

Move form traveler from A2 to A3

235

15

Cast concrete of segment A4

239

16

Tension tendons T4 and W4

240

17

Move form traveler from A3 to A4

242

18

Cast concrete of segment A5

246

19

Tension tendons T5 and W5

247

20

Move form traveler from A4 to A5

249

21

Cast concrete of segment A6

253

22

Tension tendons T6 and W6

254

23

Move form traveler from A5 to A6

256

24

Cast concrete of segment A7

260

25

Tension tendons T7 and W7

261

26

Move form traveler from A6 to A7

263

27

Cast concrete of segment A8

267

28

Tension tendons T8

268

29

Move form traveler from A7 to A8

270

30

Cast concrete of side span A10

274

31

Tension tendons B1,B2,B3

275

279

and close mid

Cast segment A9 to close mid span 1 and


32

span 1

7
A9

Second balancing

A1

33

Uninstall former traveler

280

34

Tension tendons B5~B9

282

35

Install form traveler on A0

285

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Construction

Construction Calculation

Time

Accumulated

(day)

Time (day)

Descriptions
location

Item

construction piers

A2

A3

A4

A5

A6

A7

A8

Close mid span 2


to 6

A9

Step
36

Cast concrete of segment A1

289

37

Tension tendons T1 and W1

290

38

Move form traveler from A0 to A1

292

39

Cast concrete of segment A2

296

40

Tension tendons T2 and W2

297

41

Move form traveler from A1 to A2

299

42

Cast concrete of segment A3

303

43

Tension tendons T3 and W3

304

44

Move form traveler from A2 to A3

306

45

Cast concrete of segment A4

310

46

Tension tendons T4 and W4

311

47

Move form traveler from A3 to A4

313

48

Cast concrete of segment A5

317

49

Tension tendons T5 and W5

318

50

Move form traveler from A4 to A5

320

51

Cast concrete of segment A6

324

52

Tension tendons T6 and W6

325

53

Move form traveler from A5 to A6

327

54

Cast concrete of segment A7

331

55

Tension tendons T7 and W7

332

56

Move form traveler from A6 to A7

334

57

Cast concrete of segment A8

338

58

Tension tendons T8

339

59

Move traveler from A7 to A8

341

60

Close mid span 2 with segment A9

345

61

Tension tendons B5~B9

347

62

Close mid span 3 with segment A9

351

63

Tension tendons B5~B9

353

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Construction

Construction Calculation

Time

Accumulated

(day)

Time (day)

Descriptions
location

Item

Service phase

Step
64

Close mid span 4,6 with segment A9

357

65

Tension tendons B5~B9

359

66

Close mid span 5 with segment A9

363

67

Tension tendons B5~B9

365

68

Uninstall former traveler

366

69

Construct the bridge appurtenances

60

426

70

Tension tendons B10~B14

429

71

Concrete shrinkage and creep

1071

1500

72

Regular service

1.6 Calculation Result


1.6.1 Sign specification
Bending moment Mpositive if lower fiber of beam element being tensioned and negative if
upper fiber of beam element being tensioned.
Shear force Qpositive if shear force make beam element to rotate in clockwise, if counter
clockwise, shear force is negative.
Axial force Npositive if element in compression and negative in tension.
Stresscompression stress is positive and tensile stress is negative
Displacementupward is positive and downward is negative.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
1.6.2 Result of normal stress of box girder

Figure 1.6.2-1 Normal stress diagram of girder in step 71

Figure 1.6.2-2 Normal stress diagram in service phase (combination I)

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations

Figure 1.6.2-3 Normal stress diagram in service phase (combination II)

Figure 1.6.2-4 Normal stress diagram in service phase (combination III)


In the bridge completion step, all sections of girder are all in compression. Maximum
compression stress is 11.96MPa.
In the service phase, all sections are in compressive state. Maxium compression stress is
14.79MPa.
Clause 7.1.5 in Chinese standard Code for Design of Highway Reinforcement Concrete
and Prestressed Concrete Bridges and Culverts prescribe:

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
As regard to the prestressed concrete flexural members on service stage, the compression
stress on concrete right section shall apply the following article:
Concrete maximum stress on compression zone should less than half of the characteristic
value of axial compression stress of concrete fck. For concrete C50, maximum compression stress
should not bigger than 16.2MPa.
According to our calculation, compression stress in service stage, maximum stress can
satisfy the specification in Chinese standard.

1.6.3 Result of principal stress of box girder


As specified in clause 6.3.3, the formula of principal compression stress cp and principal
tension stress tp are as the following:

tp =
cp =

cx + cy
2

cx + cy
2

cx cy

2

+ 2

cx cy
+
2

+ 2

According to the above formulas, we can get the principal stress diagrams as shown in
Figure 1.6.3-1 and 1.6.3-2. For each section, 6 points principal stresses are given in the diagram.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations

Figure 1.6.3-1 Principal stress of box girder (1)

Figure 1.6.3-2 Principal stress of box girder (2)


Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations
Volume I: Static Analysis

10

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
According to above figure, maximum principal tension stress is 1.01MPa, and the allowed
maximum principal tension stress is 1.06MPa according to clause 6.3 in Chinese standard Code
for Design of Highway Reinforcement Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Bridges and Culverts.
That is to say the maximum principal tension stress can satisfy the specification in Chinese
standard.
From above figure, we can see maximum compression stress is 11.56MPa and less than the
allowed maximum principal compression stress 16.2MPa.

1.6.4 Checking longitudinal rigidity of box girder


Under vehicle and pedestrian load, the maximum downward deflection on the center of
span is 33.4mm and maximum upward displacement is 24.4mm. According to Chinese standard,
the deflection of flexural members should consider the affection of long-term effect of load in
service stage. The long-term growth factor is 1.425. So the calculated maximum downward
deflection should be 47.6mm.
According to Chinese standard, the allowed maximum deflection is:
L/600=80000/600=133mm
From above calculation, we can conclude that the longitudinal rigidity of girder can meet
the demand in the standard.

1.6.5 Checking bearing capacity of box girder


According to the configuration and reinforcement and prestressing arrangement in box
girder, we can get the bearing capacity of every section of box girder. We can also get the
maximum and minimum bending moment under live load combinations. Figure 1.6.5 shows the
details.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

11

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations

Figure 1.6.5 Bearing capacity of box girder (Unit: tonf-m)

In the above figure, the outside 2 lines means the bearing capacity of sections, inside 2 lines
represent maximum and minimum moment of flexure of sections.
From above figure, we can see that the bearing capacity of box girder can meet the demand
of actions combinations.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

12

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
2

Calculation of Pile Cap

2.1 Pile cap P37~40, P43~44, P49~50, and P53~56


2.1.1 General
Pile cap of P37~40, P43~44, P49~50 and P53~56 are in rectangle in plane, C35 concrete,
2550cm in length, and 1200cm in width. The diameter of pile is 180cm, and the pile adopts C30
underwater concrete. Longitudinal and transverse spacing between piles is 450cm.
Arrangement of pile cap and piles is shown in Figure 2.1.1.

Figure 2.1.1 Arrangement of pile cap and piles of P37~40, P43~44, P49~50 and P53~56

2.1.2 Calculation method


The calculation of pile cap refers to chapter 8.5 of Chinese standard JTG D62-2004.
Calculation diagram of pile cap is shown in Figure 2.1.2.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

13

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations

Figure 2.1.2 Calculation diagram of pile cap

2.1.3 Calculation result


(1) Refer to Section 8.5.3 of JTG D62-2004, under general worst-case longitudinal
combination load action, the calculation result of bearing capacity of pile cap is listed in Table
2.1.3-1.
Table 2.1.3-1 Stay bar-tension rod calculation mode
Side pile maximum total counterforce Nmax (kN)

53115

Stat bar (concrete) design value of compression force 0Did (kN)

84964

Design value of concrete compression resistance tbsfcd,s

532369

tbsfcd,s>0Did, stay bar meet the require


Tension rod (rebar) design value of tension force 0Tid (kN)

61687

Design value of stretching resistance of rebar fsdAs

103358

fsdAs>0Tid, tension rod meet the require

Under general worst-case transverse combination load action, the calculation result of
bearing capacity of pile cap is listed in Table 2.1.3-2.
Table 2.1.3-2 Stay bar-tension rod calculation mode
Side pile maximum total counterforce Nmax (kN)

20846

Stat bar (concrete) design value of compression force 0Did (kN)

28633

Design value of concrete compression resistance tbsfcd,s

295268

tbsfcd,s>0Did, stay bar meet the require

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

14

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Tension rod (rebar) design value of tension force 0Tid (kN)

17148

Design value of stretching resistance of rebar fsdAs

19203

fsdAs>0Tid, tension rod meet the require

(2) Shearing resistance calculation of pile cap


Refer to Section 8.5.4 9f JTG D62-2004:
0Vd=58427kN ((0.9x10-4(2+0.6P)fcu,k1/2)/m)bsh0=780423kN, meeting the requirement.
(3) Cutting action calculation of pile cap
Refer to Section 8.5.5 of JTG D62-2004:
The cutting resistance calculation of pier cutting downward pile cap:
0Fld=136329 kN0.6ftdh0(2apx(by+ay)+2apy(bx+ax))= 178925 kN, meeting the requirement
The cutting resistance calculation of corner pile and side pile cutting upward pile cap:
Corner pile:
0Fld=9738 kN0.6ftdh0(a'px(by+ay/2)+a'py(bx+ax/2))=18062kN, meeting the requirement.
Side pile:
0Fld=9738 kN0.6ftdh0(a'px(bp+h0)+0.667(2bx+ax))=20453kN, meeting the requirement.
(4) Conclusion
Through the above analyzing, we can see that the pile caps of P37~40, P43~44, P49~50,
and P53~56 can meet the requirement of bearing capacity.

2.2 Pile cap P41~42 and P51~52


2.2.1 General
Pile caps of P41~42 and P51~52 are in rectangle in plane, C35 concrete, 2550cm in length,
and 1600cm in width. The diameter of pile is 180cm, and the pile adopts C30 underwater
concrete. Longitudinal spacing between piles is 650cm, and the transverse spacing is 450cm.
Arrangement of pile cap and piles is shown in Figure 2.2.1.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

15

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations

Figure 2.2.1 Arrangement of pile cap and piles of P41~42 and P51~52

2.2.2 Calculation result


(1) Refer to Section 8.5.3 of JTG D62-2004, under general worst-case longitudinal
combination load action, the calculation result of bearing capacity of pile cap is shown in Table
2.2.2-1.
Table 2.2.2-1 Stay bar-tension rod calculation mode
Side pile maximum total counterforce Nmax (kN)

58493

Stat bar (concrete) design value of compression force 0Did (kN)

117626

Design value of concrete compression resistance tbsfcd,s

383104

tbsfcd,s>0Did, stay bar meet the require


Tension rod (rebar) design value of tension force 0Tid (kN)

98468

Design value of stretching resistance of rebar fsdAs

145563

fsdAs>0Tid, tension rod meet the require

Under general worst-case transverse combination load action, the calculation result of
bearing capacity of pile cap is listed in Table 2.2.2-2.
Table 2.2.2-2 Stay bar-tension rod calculation mode
Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations
Volume I: Static Analysis

16

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Side pile maximum total counterforce Nmax (kN)

23100

Stat bar (concrete) design value of compression force 0Did (kN)

30392

Design value of concrete compression resistance tbsfcd,s

400307

tbsfcd,s>0Did, stay bar meet the require


Tension rod (rebar) design value of tension force 0Tid (kN)

16673

Design value of stretching resistance of rebar fsdAs

25604

fsdAs>0Tid, tension rod meet the require

(2) Shearing resistance calculation of pile cap


Refer to Section 8.5.4 of JTG D62-2004:
0Vd=64343 kN((0.9x10-4(2+0.6P)fcu,k1/2)/m)bsh0=524454kN, meeting the requirement.
(3) Refer to Section 8.5.5 of JTG D62-2004:
The cutting resistance calculation of pier cutting downward pile cap:
0Fld=150135 kN0.6ftdh0(2apx(by+ay)+2apy(bx+ax))=198007kN, meeting the requirement.
The cutting resistance calculation of corner pile and side pile cutting upward pile cap:
Corner pile:
0Fld=10724 kN0.6ftdh0(a'px(by+ay/2)+a'py(bx+ax/2))=24842kN, meeting the requirement.
Side pile:
0Fld=10724 kN0.6ftdh0(a'px(bp+h0)+0.667(2bx+ax))=24524kN, meeting the requirement.
(4) Conclusion
Through the above analyzing, we can see that pile caps of P41~42, P51~52 meet the
requirement of bearing capacity.

2.3 Pile cap P45 and P48


2.3.1 General
Pile caps of P41~42 and P51~52 are in rectangle in plane, C35 concrete, 2550cm in length,
and 1600cm in width. The diameter of pile is 180cm, and the pile adopts C30 underwater
concrete. Longitudinal spacing between piles is 650cm, and the transverse spacing is 450cm.
Pile caps of P45 and P48 are in rectangle in plane, C35 concrete, 3680cm in length, and
2580cm in width. The diameter of pile is 220cm, and the pile adopts C30 underwater concrete.
Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations
Volume I: Static Analysis

17

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Longitudinal and transverse spacing between piles is 550cm.
Arrangement of pile cap and piles is shown Figure 2.3.1.

Figure 2.3.1 Arrangement of pile cap and piles of P45 and P48

2.3.2 Calculation result


(1) Refer to Section 8.5.3 of JTG D62-2004, under general worst-case longitudinal
combination load action, the calculation result of bearing capacity of pile cap is shown in Table
2.3.2-1.
Table 2.3.2-1 Stay bar-tension rod calculation mode
Side pile maximum total counterforce Nmax (kN)

58270

Stat bar (concrete) design value of compression force 0Did (kN)

84719

Design value of concrete compression resistance tbsfcd,s

1071457

tbsfcd,s>0Did, stay bar meet the require


Tension rod (rebar) design value of tension force 0Tid (kN)

55398

Design value of stretching resistance of rebar fsdAs

105511

fsdAs>0Tid, tension rod meet the require


Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations
Volume I: Static Analysis

18

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Under general worst-case transverse combination load action, the calculation result of
bearing capacity of pile cap is shown Table 2.3.2-2.
Table 2.3.2-2 Stay bar-tension rod calculation mode
Side pile maximum total counterforce Nmax (kN)

41769

Stat bar (concrete) design value of compression force 0Did (kN)

71267

Design value of concrete compression resistance tbsfcd,s

508523

tbsfcd,s>0Did, stay bar meet the require


Tension rod (rebar) design value of tension force 0Tid (kN)

54479

Design value of stretching resistance of rebar fsdAs

73643

fsdAs>0Tid, tension rod meet the require

Under 2500 years recurrence interval seismic load and general worst-case longitudinal
combination load action, the calculation result of bearing capacity of pile cap is shown Table
2.3.2-3.
Table 2.3.2-3 Stay bar-tension rod calculation mode
Side pile maximum total counterforce Nmax (kN)

85274

Stat bar (concrete) design value of compression force 0Did (kN)

123981

Design value of concrete compression resistance tbsfcd,s

1041759

tbsfcd,s>0Did, stay bar meet the require


Tension rod (rebar) design value of tension force 0Tid (kN)

81071

Design value of stretching resistance of rebar fsdAs

126614

fsdAs>0Tid, tension rod meet the require

Under 2500 years recurrence interval seismic load and general worst-case transverse
combination load action, the calculation result of bearing capacity of pile cap is shown in Table
2.3.2-4.
Table 2.3.2-4 Stay bar-tension rod calculation mode
Side pile maximum total counterforce Nmax (kN)

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

55895

19

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Stat bar (concrete) design value of compression force 0Did (kN)

95369

Design value of concrete compression resistance tbsfcd,s

480852

tbsfcd,s>0Did, stay bar meet the require


Tension rod (rebar) design value of tension force 0Tid (kN)

72903

Design value of stretching resistance of rebar fsdAs

88371

fsdAs>0Tid, tension rod meet the require

(2) Shearing resistance calculation of pile cap


Refer to Section 8.5.4 of JTG D62-2004:
0Vd=64095 kN((0.9x10-4(2+0.6P)fcu,k1/2)/m)bsh0=2031366kN, meeting the requirement.
(3) Cutting action calculation of pile cap
Refer to Section 8.5.5 of JTG D62-2004:
The cutting resistance calculation of pier cutting downward pile cap:
0Fld=210597kN0.6ftdh0(2apx(by+ay)+2apy(bx+ax))=647335kN, meeting the requirement.
The cutting resistance calculation of corner pile and side pile cutting upward pile cap:
Corner pile:
0Fld=9156 kN0.6ftdh0(a'px(by+ay/2)+a'py(bx+ax/2))=70544kN, meeting the requirement.
Side pile:
0Fld=9156 kN0.6ftdh0(a'px(bp+h0)+0.667(2bx+ax))=45144kN, meeting the requirement.
(4) Conclusion
Through the above analyzing, we can see that pile caps of P45, P48 meet the require of
bearing capacity.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

20

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
3

Calculation of Pile Foundation

3.1 Parameters of Materials


The parameters of all kinds of materials are as follow:
Concrete: C30
Elastic modulus E3.00104MPa
Design value of axial compressive strength fcd=13.8Mpa
Ordinary reinforcing bars: SD40
Elastic modulus E=2.00105MPa
Design value of axial compressive strength fsd=326MPa

3.2 Combinations of Action


Basic combination: permanent action + variable action (partial safety factor: 1.0, 1.0)
Accidental combination 1: permanent action + variable action + accidental action 1 (partial
safety factor: 1.0, 0.5, 1.0)
Accidental combination 2: permanent action + accidental action 2 (partial safety factor: 1.0,
1.0)

3.3 Content and methods of Calculation


The calculation of pile foundation includes calculation of length of piles and checking
calculation of piles force.
The piles of the approach bridge are all designed as friction type. As specified in JTJ 024-85,
axial compressive permissible bearing force for single friction pile is calculated by the following
method:

[P] = (Ul p + A R )/ k
Where:
[P] Axial compressive permissible bearing force for single pile (kN)half of gravity of
pile shaft is considered as external force below partial scouring line.
Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations
Volume I: Static Analysis

21

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
k Safety factorFor basic combination, k=2.0; for accidental combination 1, k=1.5; for
accidental combination 2, k=1.33.
U Perimeter of pile (m);
L Effective length (m) of pile below partial scouring line;
A Section area at bottom of pile (m2);
p Average ultimate friction force (kPa), exerted by soil around the pipe wall;
R Ultimate bearing capacity of pile toe soil (kPa), which can be calculated by the

following formula:

R = 2m0 {[ 0 ] + k 2 2 (h 3)}
[0] allowable bearing capacity of pile toe soil (kPa);
h Buried depth of pile toe (m), for scouring foundation, the buried depth should be
calculated from the general scour line; For no scouring foundation, the buried depth should be
calculated from natural ground line or ground line after actual excavation; the value of h shall be
no more than 40m, when it is more than 40m, its value shall be 40m or be confirmed by test;
k2 Coefficient of modification of allowable bearing capacity of surface soil along with
the depth, it shall be chosen according to Table 2.1.4 in JTJ 024-85;
2 Unite weight of pile toe soil (kN/m3);
Coefficient of correction, which can be referred to Table 4.3.2-2 in JTJ 024-85;

m0 Coefficient of cleaning up of bottom, which is adopted according to Table 4.3.2-3 in


JTJ 024-85.
Pile group is calculated with m method in accordance with JTJ 024-85, and scouring has
been taken into account.

3.4 Actions on Top of Piles and Forces of Combination


3.4.1 Longitudinal actions at the top of piles
The longitudinal actions at the top of piles are listed in Table 3.4.1-1 ~ 3.4.1-3.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

22

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.4.1-1 Longitudinal basic action (Unit: kN, m)
Basic action
Pier No.

Permanent
action

Horizontal
variable

action

action

P37

97729.4

8651.2

2213.2

P38

104078.3

9096.4

2377.8

P39

106071.4

9266.6

2368.2

P40

108152.9

9433.6

2362.1

P41

126381.8

9466.4

2310.2

P42

128038.9

9262.6

3982.0

P43

114862.3

9036.4

2384.9

P44

111567.6

8609.4

2208.4

P45

264959.2

13110.4

1215.5

P48

264959.2

13110.4

1215.5

P49

111567.6

8609.4

2208.4

P50

114862.3

9036.4

2384.9

P51

128038.9

9262.6

6161.4

P52

126381.8

9466.4

3900.2

P53

108152.9

9433.6

2362.1

P54

106071.4

9266.6

2368.2

P55

104078.3

9096.4

2377.8

P56

97729.4

8651.2

2213.2

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

Vertical
variable

23

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.4.1-2 Longitudinal accidental action 1 (Unit: kN, m)
Pier No.

P37

-2246.4

92515.1

13052.1

P38

2318.2

93432.6

10562.1

P39

2233.6

107712.0

9626.1

P40

2706.7

114661.0

8657.7

P41

2658.6

170488.3

6768.5

P42

-3326.6

135429.6

5957.8

P43

2362.1

114758.2

4898.0

P44

2865.2

116878.7

4419.4

P45

-6666.7

275423.5

15429.8

P48

6833.9

258016.5

19256.2

P49

-2549.6

117826.6

5665.7

P50

4040.6

115885.1

5679.7

P51

2659.4

189324.9

7524.0

P52

2812.1

208576.1

8432.6

P53

2198.3

109385.3

8382.4

P54

2292.0

112449.6

9375.0

P55

3260.4

84034.9

8117.5

P56

2516.2

71597.6

9604.9

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

Accidental action 1

24

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.4.1-3 Longitudinal accidental action 2 (Unit: kN, m)
Pier No.

Accidental action 2
N

P37

-3184.7

89899.0

24012.8

P38

3674.8

103657.4

17750.9

P39

-3817.5

131269.8

16793.1

P40

-4854.8

140684.5

12949.4

P41

-4740.2

326899.9

13848.1

P42

5096.0

312878.4

11349.1

P43

4149.3

191781.1

9863.8

P44

-3955.7

153012.3

8765.0

P45

9629.4

489736.8

30244.6

P48

-9440.9

411025.7

34294.3

P49

-4599.7

155336.9

9878.9

P50

-4584.8

181073.9

10184.3

P51

5520.1

253794.9

13189.0

P52

4636.3

372796.1

15102.2

P53

3899.8

133322.8

13564.2

P54

-3884.8

144824.3

13824.7

P55

3532.0

152156.0

16392.4

P56

-3038.2

99477.6

15155.4

3.4.2 Combination of longitudinal actions the top of piles


Force combination of longitudinal action at the top of piles of all piers are listed in Table
3.4.2-1 ~ 3.4.2-3.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

25

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.4.2-1 Longitudinal basic combination (Unit: kN, m)
Pier No.

P37

106380.6

35057.3

2213.2

P38

113174.7

45218.1

2377.8

P39

115338.0

52744.7

2368.2

P40

117586.5

60295.7

2362.1

P41

135848.2

67405.1

2310.2

P42

137301.5

124083.2

3982.0

P43

123898.7

82121.8

2384.9

P44

120177.0

79851.7

2208.4

P45

278069.6

58725.8

1215.5

P48

278069.6

58725.8

1215.5

P49

120177.0

79851.7

2208.4

P50

123898.7

82121.8

2384.9

P51

137301.5

188238.2

6161.4

P52

135848.2

109122.0

3900.2

P53

117586.5

60295.7

2362.1

P54

115338.0

52744.7

2368.2

P55

113174.7

45218.1

2377.8

P56

106380.6

35057.3

2213.2

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

Basic combination

26

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.4.2-2 Longitudinal accidental combination 1 (Unit: kN, m)
Pier No.

P37

99808.6

132065.1

14158.7

P38

110944.7

134486.7

11751.0

P39

112938.3

151175.3

10810.2

P40

115576.3

160499.3

9838.8

P41

133773.6

219195.3

7923.6

P42

129343.6

211098.3

7948.8

P43

121742.6

166037.7

6090.5

P44

118737.5

166222.8

5523.6

P45

264847.7

346127.5

16037.6

P48

278348.2

337329.8

19863.9

P49

113322.7

169040.1

6769.9

P50

123421.1

168337.1

6872.1

P51

135329.6

299812.1

10604.7

P52

133927.2

281053.7

10382.7

P53

115067.9

154810.5

9563.4

P54

112996.7

155536.3

10559.1

P55

111886.9

121422.2

9306.4

P56

104571.2

105976.8

10711.5

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

Accidental combination 1

27

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.4.2-3 Longitudinal accidental combination 2 (Unit: kN, m)
Pier No.

Accidental combination 2
N

P37

94544.7

130804.8

24012.8

P38

107753.1

135487.6

17750.9

P39

102253.9

161763.0

16793.1

P40

103298.0

165516.3

12949.4

P41

121641.6

357453.2

13848.1

P42

133135.0

339141.3

11349.1

P43

119011.6

212319.8

9863.8

P44

107611.9

171738.2

8765.0

P45

274588.5

571035.0

30244.6

P48

255518.3

501435.8

34294.3

P49

106967.9

175733.7

9878.9

P50

110277.5

202093.4

10184.3

P51

133559.0

283277.6

13189.0

P52

131018.2

405544.1

15102.2

P53

112052.6

159076.8

13564.2

P54

102186.6

170865.0

13824.7

P55

107610.3

181948.5

16392.4

P56

94691.2

127097.1

15155.4

3.4.3 Transverse actions at the top of piles


The transverse actions at the top of piles of all piers are listed in Table 3.4.3-1 ~ 3.4.3-3.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

28

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.4.3-1 Transverse basic action (Unit: kN, m)
Basic action
Pier No.

Permanent

Horizontal
variable

P37

97729.4

8651.2

0.0

P38

104078.3

9096.4

0.0

P39

106071.4

9266.6

0.0

P40

108152.9

9433.6

0.0

P41

126381.8

9466.4

0.0

P42

128038.9

9262.6

0.0

P43

114862.3

9036.4

0.0

P44

111567.6

8609.4

0.0

P45

264959.2

13110.4

0.0

P48

264959.2

13110.4

0.0

P49

111567.6

8609.4

0.0

P50

114862.3

9036.4

0.0

P51

128038.9

9262.6

0.0

P52

126381.8

9466.4

0.0

P53

108152.9

9433.6

0.0

P54

106071.4

9266.6

0.0

P55

104078.3

9096.4

0.0

P56

97729.4

8651.2

0.0

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

Vertical
variable

29

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.4.3-2 Transverse accidental action 1 (Unit: kN, m)
Pier No.

P37

1611.5

71617.3

8926.6

P38

2179.2

115471.2

7100.0

P39

2289.5

139515.3

7696.3

P40

-2825.2

114661.3

7300.7

P41

-2474.8

131524.7

6301.5

P42

2530.7

189833.4

7908.5

P43

2269.3

170750.3

6420.5

P44

-2259.7

92892.6

4522.5

P45

-6771.9

271856.8

17867.7

P48

7051.2

297108.3

21716.7

P49

-3360.3

114500.5

5230.5

P50

3121.0

211242.1

8624.3

P51

3315.8

231263.8

10760.0

P52

-2614.0

126810.4

8628.6

P53

-2491.2

175022.3

9066.4

P54

-2359.5

190164.5

9435.7

P55

-2398.9

119734.1

8251.4

P56

-1943.5

67037.1

7738.4

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

Accidental action 1

30

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.4.3-3 Transverse accidental action 2 (Unit: kN, m)
Pier No.

Accidental action 2
N

P37

-3533.5

148478.4

14735.9

P38

3346.1

162633.5

14137.7

P39

3652.4

219323.0

13641.8

P40

3995.9

212755.6

15397.3

P41

3842.6

238794.3

10765.3

P42

-4670.1

297498.8

16046.1

P43

4195.6

255235.8

12183.4

P44

4079.5

156552.7

7692.8

P45

9154.3

301184.7

30685.3

P48

-10200.2

537346.9

36478.7

P49

-3655.6

247228.5

9529.5

P50

4351.8

271440.6

14200.1

P51

4117.8

412948.2

15938.1

P52

-4081.3

302302.9

16577.8

P53

3953.6

241837.4

14846.7

P54

3458.3

270577.4

16187.2

P55

-3225.9

235596.1

15287.0

P56

-3531.9

122936.8

12962.5

3.4.4 Combination of transverse actions at the top of piles


Force combination of transverse action at the top of piles of all piers are listed in Table
3.4.4-1 ~ 3.4.4-3.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

31

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.4.4-1 Transverse basic combination (Unit: kN, m)
Pier No.

P37

106380.6

5319.0

0.0

P38

113174.7

5658.7

0.0

P39

115338.0

5766.9

0.0

P40

117586.5

5879.3

0.0

P41

135848.2

6792.4

0.0

P42

137301.5

6865.1

0.0

P43

123898.7

6194.9

0.0

P44

120177.0

6008.9

0.0

P45

278069.6

13903.5

0.0

P48

278069.6

13903.5

0.0

P49

120177.0

6008.9

0.0

P50

123898.7

6194.9

0.0

P51

137301.5

6865.1

0.0

P52

135848.2

6792.4

0.0

P53

117586.5

5879.3

0.0

P54

115338.0

5766.9

0.0

P55

113174.7

5658.7

0.0

P56

106380.6

5319.0

0.0

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

Basic combination

32

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.4.4-2 Transverse accidental combination 1 (Unit: kN, m)
Pier No.

P37

103666.5

90109.9

8926.6

P38

110805.7

131552.6

7100.0

P39

112994.1

156595.1

7696.3

P40

110044.5

131255.8

7300.7

P41

128640.3

149108.0

6301.5

P42

135200.9

210306.7

7908.5

P43

121649.8

186350.1

6420.5

P44

113612.7

105469.9

4522.5

P45

264742.4

325634.8

17867.7

P48

278565.6

359546.7

21716.7

P49

112512.0

128139.9

5230.5

P50

122501.5

230147.6

8624.3

P51

135986.0

256727.3

10760.0

P52

128501.1

148466.3

8628.6

P53

110378.5

194265.3

9066.4

P54

108345.2

209853.2

9435.7

P55

106227.6

137542.4

8251.4

P56

100111.5

83747.5

7738.4

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

Accidental combination 1

33

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.4.4-3 Transverse accidental combination 2 (Unit: kN, m)
Pier No.

Accidental combination 2
N

P37

94195.9

175468.7

14735.9

P38

107424.4

189043.9

14137.7

P39

109723.8

245089.3

13641.8

P40

112148.8

241259.2

15397.3

P41

130224.4

263952.7

10765.3

P42

123368.8

331981.5

16046.1

P43

119057.9

279253.9

12183.4

P44

115647.1

173670.2

7692.8

P45

274113.5

383474.5

30685.3

P48

254759.0

632672.0

36478.7

P49

107912.0

267101.1

9529.5

P50

119214.0

298483.8

14200.1

P51

132156.8

447241.8

15938.1

P52

122300.5

337633.1

16577.8

P53

112106.4

269515.0

14846.7

P54

109529.7

300161.8

16187.2

P55

100852.4

263730.4

15287.0

P56

94197.5

147267.0

12962.5

3.5 Related Parameters


3.5.1 Levels of sea bed and scour depths
The levels on pile top of all piers are all -0.99m. The levels of sea bed and scouring depths
are showed in Table 3.5.1.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

34

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.5.1 Levels of sea bed and scouring depths (Unit: m)
Levels of sea

Scouring

bed

depth

P37

-7.691

8.350

P38

-11.588

P39

Levels of sea

Scouring

bed

depth

P48

-14.375

8.900

8.790

P49

-14.091

5.340

-13.282

9.270

P50

-13.426

5.350

P40

-13.886

8.880

P51

-12.900

6.170

P41

-16.191

9.420

P52

-12.644

6.160

P42

-16.730

8.940

P53

-12.389

5.280

P43

-17.268

7.410

P54

-12.133

5.190

P44

-17.807

6.700

P55

-11.589

5.090

P45

-18.261

10.200

P56

-10.903

4.990

Pier No.

Pier No.

3.5.2 Boring depths and parameters


The boring depths and parameters of soil around piles are listed Table 3.5.2-1 ~ 3.5.2-18.
Table 3.5.2-1 Ultimate friction force of soil around pile of P37
Layer No.

Total depth
(m)

Ultimate
friction force
(kPa)

15.60

30

17.00

40

27.40

65

30.00

65

Table 3.5.2-2 Ultimate friction force of soil around pile of P38


Layer No.

(m)

Ultimate
friction force
(kPa)

5.50

25

7.00

30

11.50

55

23.50

65

30.00

55

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

Total depth

35

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.5.2-3 Ultimate friction force of soil around pile of P39
Layer No.

Total depth
(m)

Ultimate
friction force
(kPa)

5.50

25

7.00

30

18.00

65

29.00

70

41.00

65

59.00

60

Table 3.5.2-4 Ultimate friction force of soil around pile of P40


Layer No.

Total depth
(m)

Ultimate
friction force
(kPa)

5.50

45

16.40

50

20.40

65

45.90

55

49.00

60

60.45

55

Table 3.5.2-5 Ultimate friction force of soil around pile of P41


Layer No.

(m)

Ultimate
friction force
(kPa)

5.00

50

18.40

55

22.00

60

42.70

55

49.50

60

60.45

50

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

Total depth

36

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.5.2-6 Ultimate friction force of soil around pile of P42
Layer No.

Total depth
(m)

Ultimate
friction force
(kPa)

10.00

50

12.20

55

16.45

50

20.00

60

41.80

55

52.00

65

56.00

50

60.45

60

Table 3.5.2-7 Ultimate friction force of soil around pile of P43


Layer No.

(m)

Ultimate
friction force
(kPa)

4.50

50

15.00

55

20.50

50

34.00

55

40.25

50

47.00

60

53.00

65

70.45

65

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

Total depth

37

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.5.2-8 Ultimate friction force of soil around pile of P44
Layer No.

Total depth
(m)

Ultimate
friction force
(kPa)

1.50

25

10.50

50

13.50

45

28.00

55

30.00

40

44.50

50

45.50

55

60.00

50

Table 3.5.2-9 Ultimate friction force of soil around pile of P45


Layer No.

Total depth
(m)

Ultimate
friction force
(kPa)

6.45

50

9.00

50

11.00

45

14.00

60

28.00

60

56.45

60

70.45

50

Table 3.5.2-10 Ultimate friction force of soil around pile of P48


Layer No.

(m)

Ultimate
friction force
(kPa)

12.00

20

30.00

50

60.00

50

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

Total depth

38

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.5.2-11 Ultimate friction force of soil around pile of P49
Layer No.

Total depth
(m)

Ultimate
friction force
(kPa)

11.30

20

13.50

80

30.00

55

69.00

50

80.45

55

Table 3.5.2-12 Ultimate friction force of soil around pile of P50


Layer No.

Total depth
(m)

Ultimate
friction force
(kPa)

11.00

20

12.00

65

14.00

70

20.00

50

30.00

50

38.00

60

60.00

55

68.00

50

75.00

50

10

80.00

50

Table 3.5.2-13 Ultimate friction force of soil around pile of P51


Layer No.

(m)

Ultimate
friction force
(kPa)

13.00

20

28.00

65

34.10

55

76.00

60

80.45

50

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

Total depth

39

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.5.2-14 Ultimate friction force of soil around pile of P52
Layer No.

Total depth
(m)

Ultimate
friction force
(kPa)

10.00

25

17.00

50

60.00

55

Table 3.5.2-15 Ultimate friction force of soil around pile of P53


Layer No.

Total depth
(m)

Ultimate
friction force
(kPa)

11.00

20

15.45

50

23.00

50

29.00

50

54.00

50

80.95

50

Table 3.5.2-16 Ultimate friction force of soil around pile of P54


Layer No.

(m)

Ultimate
friction force
(kPa)

10.00

25

16.00

65

20.00

50

25.00

55

51.30

50

52.00

60

60.00

50

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

Total depth

40

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.5.2-17 Ultimate friction force of soil around pile of P55
Layer No.

Total depth
(m)

Ultimate
friction force
(kPa)

10.00

20

12.50

60

14.50

45

18.25

50

20.45

50

49.20

50

84.95

50

Table 3.5.2-18 Ultimate friction force of soil around pile of P56


Layer No.

Total depth
(m)

Ultimate
friction force
(kPa)

10.00

25

15.00

45

30.00

50

60.00

50

60.50

55

85.50

50

93.00

50

95.00

45

The boring depths and parameters of piers are listed Table 3.5.2-1 ~ 3.5.2-18.

3.5.3 Allowable bearing capacity of soil at pile base


The allowable bearing capacities of soil at pile base are listed in Table 3.5.3.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

41

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.5.3 Allowable bearing capacities of soil at pile base (Unit: kPa)
Pier No.

Allowable bearing
capacities of pile toe soil

Pier No.

Allowable bearing
capacities of pile toe soil

P37

450.00

P48

250.00

P38

340.00

P49

350.00

P39

520.00

P50

300.00

P40

350.00

P51

400.00

P41

340.00

P52

250.00

P42

450.00

P53

300.00

P43

450.00

P54

350.00

P44

200.00

P55

300.00

P45

430.00

P56

250.00

3.6 Calculation of Length of Piles


3.6.1 Length of pile
The calculation of length of piles is controlled by the longitudinal basic combination. In
calculating the capacity of piles, the safety factor is 2.0 and the capacity of pile toe is controlled
within 25% of total capacity.
The calculated lengths of piles of all piers are listed in Table 3.6.1.
Table 3.6.1 Length of pile (Unit: m)
Pier No.

Length

Pier No.

Length

P37

61.00

P48

86.00

P38

71.00

P49

86.00

P39

69.00

P50

84.00

P40

80.00

P51

94.00

P41

89.00

P52

92.00

P42

93.00

P53

83.00

P43

86.00

P54

77.00

P44

90.00

P55

77.00

P45

80.00

P56

73.00

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

42

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
3.6.2 Check of bearing capacity at pile base
The safety factors for capacity of pile toe are 2.0, 1.5 and 1.33, respectively for basic
combination, accidental combination 1 and 2. The Utilization ratios of capacity are listed in
Table 3.6.2-1 ~ 3.6.3-3, respectively.
Table 3.6.2-1 Bearing capacity at pile base at basic combination
Maximum Vertical
Pier No.

Force at Single Pile

Pile Weight

Head

Total Vertical Force

Bearing Capacity

Utilization

at Single Pile Toe

of One Pile

Ratio

P37

6861.56

2508.14

9369.70

9460.59

0.990

P38

7550.27

2983.99

10534.26

10552.17

0.998

P39

7852.42

2997.99

10850.41

10923.13

0.993

P40

8117.22

3354.35

11471.57

11496.34

0.998

P41

8692.32

3741.81

12434.13

12464.83

0.998

P42

9817.70

4007.86

13825.56

13840.50

0.999

P43

8911.73

3623.21

12534.94

12614.88

0.994

P44

8612.48

3722.00

12334.48

12343.94

0.999

P45

8186.46

5289.38

13475.84

13537.33

0.995

P48

8178.21

5307.07

13485.28

13532.72

0.996

P49

8506.53

3416.41

11922.94

11982.29

0.995

P50

8778.83

3359.25

12138.08

12146.93

0.999

P51

10792.55

3817.78

14610.33

14697.04

0.994

P52

9358.68

3734.35

13093.03

13161.52

0.995

P53

8004.22

3288.05

11292.27

11364.02

0.994

P54

7736.51

3052.73

10789.24

10809.28

0.998

P55

7468.09

3052.77

10520.86

10548.97

0.997

P56

6858.50

2881.32

9739.82

9802.71

0.994

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

43

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.6.2-2 Bearing capacity at pile base at accidental combination 1
Maximum Vertical
Pier No.

Force at Single Pile

Pile Weight

Head

Total Vertical Force

Bearing Capacity

Utilization

at Single Pile Toe

of One Pile

Ratio

P37

9263.60

2508.14

11771.74

12614.12

0.933

P38

9602.24

2983.99

12586.23

14069.56

0.895

P39

9679.11

2997.99

12677.10

14564.17

0.870

P40

10005.33

3354.35

13359.68

15328.46

0.872

P41

10447.11

3741.81

14188.92

16619.78

0.854

P42

10467.05

4007.86

14474.91

18454.00

0.784

P43

9861.13

3623.21

13484.34

16819.84

0.802

P44

9595.69

3722.00

13317.69

16458.59

0.809

P45

10482.08

5289.38

15771.46

18049.78

0.874

P48

10310.05

5307.07

15617.12

18043.63

0.866

P49

9766.92

3416.41

13183.33

15976.38

0.825

P50

10289.12

3359.25

13648.37

16195.90

0.843

P51

10686.21

3817.78

14503.99

19596.06

0.740

P52

10775.82

3734.35

14510.17

17548.70

0.827

P53

9564.36

3288.05

12852.41

15152.03

0.848

P54

9472.12

3052.73

12524.85

14412.37

0.869

P55

9125.71

3052.77

12178.48

14065.29

0.866

P56

8575.55

2881.32

11456.87

13070.28

0.877

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

44

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.6.2-3 Bearing capacity at pile base at accidental combination 2
Maximum Vertical
Pier No.

Force at Single Pile

Pile Weight

Head

Total Vertical Force

Bearing Capacity

Utilization

at Single Pile Toe

of One Pile

Ratio

P37

10604.91

2508.14

13113.05

14226.45

0.922

P38

10502.40

2983.99

13486.39

15867.92

0.850

P39

11380.96

2997.99

14378.95

16425.76

0.875

P40

11390.00

3354.35

14744.35

17287.74

0.853

P41

12053.85

3741.81

15795.66

18744.11

0.843

P42

11931.76

4007.86

15939.62

20812.78

0.766

P43

11819.30

3623.21

15442.51

18969.74

0.814

P44

11431.44

3722.00

15153.44

18562.32

0.816

P45

12111.99

5289.38

17401.37

20356.89

0.855

P48

12060.00

5307.07

17367.07

20349.96

0.853

P49

12016.47

3416.41

15432.88

18018.47

0.857

P50

12558.59

3359.25

15917.84

18266.05

0.871

P51

13471.66

3817.78

17289.44

22100.82

0.782

P52

13926.65

3734.35

17661.00

19791.76

0.892

P53

11509.98

3288.05

14798.03

17088.75

0.866

P54

11684.50

3052.73

14737.23

16254.55

0.907

P55

11393.20

3052.77

14445.97

15863.11

0.911

P56

10300.73

2881.32

13182.05

14740.92

0.894

In the tables above, Weight of Pile includes the weight of the pile shaft and steel pile
casing whose length is 15m. For pile shaft above the scour line, the weight is the total weight of
pile, while for pile shaft under the scour line, 50% of the weight is taken into account according
to JTJ 024-85.
From the tables above, the capacities of pile toe f all piers are satisfied.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

45

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
3.7 Internal Forces and Strength Capacity of Pile
3.7.1 Piles of V-pier
For pies V, the effect of pier48 is the worst under the transverse accidental combination 2.
Internal forces of pile are listed in Table 3.7.1-1.
Table 3.7.1-1 Internal forces in one pile of P48 under transverse accidental combination 2
FE. model
Time history

Ns (MN)

My (MNm) Mz (MNm)

Vy (MN)

Vz (MN)

Mt (MNm)

Vymax

-271.64

-32.72

513.19

25.99

0.11

103.06

Mzmax

-271.51

-22.01

587.61

25.33

0.32

83.73

Mtmax

-270.27

-4.91

411.14

16.76

0.11

170.98

-279.58

-79.43

495.48

22.88

1.32

147.46

Response spectrum

From the table above it can be found that results from response spectrum model is bigger
than the former one. But since these values from response spectrum model are the biggest for
each force component, which will not occur simultaneously in fact, they are more conservative
compared with the results in time-history model.
There are 64 main reinforcing bars, whose diameter is 25mm, in single pile of pier V. The
strength capacities of pile foundation and the utilization ratios are listed in Table 3.7.1-2.
Table 3.7.1-2 Strength Capacity of one pile of P48 under transverse accidental combination 2
FE. model

Ns (MN)

My (MNm) Mz (MNm) M (MNm)

Utilization
ratio

Vymax

-4.45

3.85

13.37

13.91

0.968

Mzmax

-4.18

3.30

12.60

13.02

0.905

Mtmax

-5.15

6.53

11.26

13.02

0.850

Response spectrum

-4.26

5.05

13.20

14.13

0.999

Time history

From the table above, the capacities of pile foundation of pier V are satisfied.

3.7.2 Piles of other piers


Because the special effect is not obvious, for ordinary piers except from pier V, calculation
Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations
Volume I: Static Analysis

46

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
of piles force is carried out separately in longitudinal and transverse direction.
Internal forces of pile are listed in Table 3.7.2-1 ~ 3.7.2-4.
Table 3.7.2-1 Minimum vertical force on top of pile in longitudinal direction (Unit: kN)
Basic

Accidental

Accidental

combination

combination1

combination 2

P37

5018.5

2831.9

918.1

P38

5107.0

3218.1

1544.7

P39

5056.6

2416.9

2370.4

P40

5034.4

1908.0

1338.7

P41

6382.7

4132.9

3118.9

P42

5506.8

3950.0

3416.9

P43

4914.0

3102.1

1670.8

P44

4773.5

3274.6

2422.8

P49

4853.0

2920.9

3383.9

P50

5002.8

3185.3

2673.5

P51

4546.6

3868.3

2518.7

P52

5730.1

4181.0

3035.5

P53

5068.4

2439.6

472.4

P54

5082.6

2913.6

2023.4

P55

5107.0

3108.6

1859.4

P56

4950.5

2777.9

1916.5

Pier No.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

47

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.7.2-2 Bending moment on top of pile in longitudinal direction (Unit: kN-m)
Basic

Accidental

Accidental

combination

combination1

combination 2

P37

727.0

5200.1

8866.4

P38

1029.3

5217.9

7793.9

P39

1123.1

6353.9

7316.9

P40

1144.8

5318.5

5778.6

P41

1301.0

4610.5

6370.3

P42

2297.7

4830.0

5538.4

P43

1345.5

3744.4

4488.2

P44

1272.9

3503.4

3914.4

P49

1034.4

3165.9

4341.2

P50

1079.1

3815.1

4554.1

P51

2894.6

5191.4

5537.3

P52

1811.2

5053.1

6500.9

P53

1042.8

4821.9

6363.3

P54

1044.9

5612.7

7216.5

P55

1029.4

5669.7

7433.4

P56

930.9

5860.6

6997.2

Pier No.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

48

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.7.2-3 Minimum vertical force on top of pile in transverse direction (Unit: kN)
Basic

Accidental

Accidental

combination

combination1

combination 2

P37

5389.9

3525.2

2560.3

P38

5600.4

4119.4

2997.5

P39

5621.0

4141.7

2157.8

P40

5659.6

4263.3

1279.9

P41

6576.3

5621.2

4044.6

P42

5860.0

4423.7

1908.7

P43

5735.5

3938.0

1663.2

P44

5567.3

4380.1

4081.5

P49

5610.8

4861.3

3221.4

P50

5784.1

4070.0

1521.7

P51

5057.1

4489.4

990.1

P52

6030.7

4450.1

3028.3

P53

5678.3

3905.5

1961.0

P54

5635.4

3162.2

678.5

P55

5600.4

3843.0

2589.4

P56

5352.4

4122.8

3023.7

Pier No.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

49

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.7.2-4 Bending moment on top of pile in transverse direction (Unit: kN-m)
Basic

Accidental

Accidental

combination

combination1

combination 2

P37

782.9

3186.8

5056.5

P38

1095.1

3100.4

5658.1

P39

1199.5

3798.1

6826.8

P40

1233.6

3881.6

8304.3

P41

1351.9

3583.6

6235.6

P42

2387.6

4930.0

9365.3

P43

1463.5

4168.9

7954.5

P44

1387.2

2721.4

5204.3

P49

1158.5

3044.7

5356.5

P50

1208.2

4398.0

7922.0

P51

3038.7

5424.4

8924.7

P52

1899.1

3968.9

6919.8

P53

1135.3

4197.2

7134.6

P54

1123.9

4655.3

8552.5

P55

1095.2

4118.3

6442.6

P56

979.7

3158.9

5463.6

Pier No.

There are 48 main reinforcing bars, whose diameter is 29mm, in single pile of ordinary pier.
For basic combination and accidental combination 1, the design values of the capacities of
the materials are used; for accidental combination 2, the standard values are used.
Strength capacities of pile in longitudinal and transverse direction are listed in Table 3.7.2-5
~ 3.7.2-8.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

50

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.7.2-5 Axial force capacity at the top of pile in longitudinal direction (Unit: kN)
Basic

Accidental

Accidental

combination

combination1

combination2

P37

36227.1

4989.7

951.9

P38

33003.7

5805.6

1910.8

P39

31879.8

3258.1

3332.8

P40

31596.6

3040.7

2271.6

P41

32877.7

9156.9

5456.5

P42

23041.5

8198.9

7275.9

P43

29199.7

8326.3

3920.2

P44

29557.9

9626.0

7308.6

P49

32364.6

9477.7

9800.0

P50

32227.3

8404.7

6838.6

P51

16757.1

7320.3

4985.6

P52

27185.3

8316.5

5146.7

P53

32773.0

4564.4

668.8

P54

32781.7

4707.6

2817.2

P55

33003.7

5032.7

2474.4

P56

33754.2

4221.2

2747.4

Pier No.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

51

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.7.2-6 Bending moment capacity at the top of pile in longitudinal direction (Unit: kN-m)
Basic

Accidental

Accidental

combination

combination1

combination2

P37

5955.9

9390.3

9226.1

P38

7429.7

9677.8

9728.5

P39

7879.8

8708.2

10432.0

P40

7988.5

8615.6

9911.7

P41

7481.7

10631.5

11391.3

P42

10514.6

10396.1

12126.8

P43

8835.9

10429.1

10708.3

P44

8717.1

10735.9

12139.3

P49

7689.4

10703.7

13016.1

P50

7743.9

10449.2

11957.2

P51

11429.3

10154.1

11188.0

P52

9456.8

10426.6

11258.2

P53

7524.6

9231.9

9073.5

P54

7521.0

9285.9

10182.7

P55

7429.7

9406.1

10013.3

P56

7111.5

9099.7

10148.4

Pier No.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

52

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.7.2-7 Axial force capacity at the top of pile in transverse direction (Unit: kN)
Basic

Accidental

Accidental

combination

combination1

combination2

P37

36207.6

11703.9

5689.2

P38

33336.0

14264.2

6013.0

P39

32351.3

11518.3

3237.2

P40

32102.9

11613.6

1449.8

P41

32781.7

16736.1

7753.9

P42

23399.3

9166.8

1967.7

P43

30143.3

9749.7

2024.7

P44

30451.3

17125.6

9873.1

P49

32729.3

17004.3

7047.3

P50

32597.9

9512.3

1847.6

P51

17634.1

8316.5

1021.2

P52

27235.6

11884.8

4760.4

P53

33090.3

9576.6

2753.7

P54

33120.6

6534.3

719.1

P55

33336.0

9606.3

4291.7

P56

34037.0

14003.2

6350.5

Pier No.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

53

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Table 3.7.2-8 Bending moment capacity at the top of pile in transverse direction (Unit: kN-m)
Basic

Accidental

Accidental

combination

combination 1

combination 2

P37

5965.7

11112.2

11489.8

P38

7290.6

11380.8

11624.7

P39

7694.7

11084.3

10386.3

P40

7792.9

11098.8

9489.8

P41

7521.0

11429.8

12306.8

P42

10433.4

10633.8

9757.6

P43

8517.2

10762.3

9786.7

P44

8409.0

11417.9

13039.6

P49

7542.4

11422.2

12038.7

P50

7595.7

10711.3

9696.1

P51

11393.8

10426.6

9263.2

P52

9442.3

11138.3

11088.9

P53

7393.7

10725.3

10151.5

P54

7381.0

9916.2

9100.8

P55

7290.6

10731.7

10878.7

P56

6987.8

11363.4

11762.6

Pier No.

Form the tables above, the capacities of pile foundation are all satisfied.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

54

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
4

Transverse Analysis of Box Girder

4.1 Check of Top Plate


4.1.1 Analysis model
A FE model of the concrete girder is created in order to determine the transverse effects. A
unit length long segment at mid span is modeled. The model is vertically supported at the bottom
of the concrete webs. The transverse prestressing tendons is j15.24-3 and be set 60cm at
intervals. The analysis model is shown in the following Figure 4.1.1.

Figure 4.1.1 Transverse analysis FE-model

4.1.2 Material
The material parameters of concrete and prestressing tendons are the same with the
longitudinal calculation.

4.1.3 Load
4.1.3.1 Dead load (self-weight of structure and equipment)

Dead load is in accordance with the Design Criteria and the design drawings.
4.1.3.2 Prestressing effect

The effective prestress has been taken as 60% of the breaking stress to account for
prestressing losses, relaxation of tendon, and creep and shrinkage of concrete. An effective
prestressing force of 780 kN/m along the bridge direction has been used.
Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations
Volume I: Static Analysis

55

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
4.1.3.3 Live loads

(1) Traffic load in accordance with British standard BS 5400


Traffic load is in accordance with BS 5400. Axle loads from the HB loading have been used.
For SLS: HB30+HB30. For ULS: HB45+HB30.
(2) Traffic load in accordance with JTG D60-2004
According to Chinese standard JTG D60-2004, the vehicle load is Highway Class-I,
composed of lane load and car load.

4.1.4 Analysis results


4.1.4.1 Analysis results in accordance with BS 5400

Unfactored bending moments are summarised in Table 4.1.4.1.


Position 1 is the section of deck outside the web near motorcycle way. Position 2 is the
section of deck at mid span between the two webs. Sign convention of moments is positive for
sagging moments. Position 3 is the section of deck outside the web near medium strip.
Table 4.1.4.1 Bending moment in accordance with BS 5400
Maximum Moment (kNm/m)
Load
Position 1

Position 2

Position 3

Dead load

-163.78

8.1

-98.43

Prestressing effect

158.03

-40.14

162.63

HB30+HB30

43

-167

HB45+HB30

64

-246

Motorway load

-29

Position 1 and position 3 have the same section. From the table it can found that position 3
controls the design.
4.1.4.2 Analysis results in accordance with JTG D60-2004

Unfactored bending moments are summarised in Table 4.1.4.2. Position 1, 2 and 3 are the
same with those in Section 4.1.4.1.
Table 4.1.4.2 Bending moment in accordance with JTG D60-2004
Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations
Volume I: Static Analysis

56

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Maximum Moment (kNm/m)
Load
Position 1

Position 2

Position 3

Dead load

-163.78

8.1

-98.43

Prestressing effect

158.03

-40.14

162.63

HB30+HB30

26.88

-109.65

HB45+HB30

-29

Motorway load

-29

Position 1 and position 3 have the same section. From the table it can be found that position
3 controls the design.

4.1.5 Check of top plate


4.1.5.1 Check of top plate in accordance with BS 5400
(1) Ultimate limit state
Table 4.1.5.1-1 Bending moment resistance at ULS in accordance with BS 5400
Position 2

Position 3

Max. design moment (kNm/m)

69.11

346.14

Ultimate moment of resistance (kNm/m)

168.41

591.45

Utilisation ratio

0.41

0.59

(2) Serviceability limit state

1) Bottom fibre of position 2


Stress in compression caused by effective prestress pc:
N
N e y
pc = p A + p pn n I = 6.15MPa
n
n
Stress in tensility caused by short-term action effects:
st = M s W = 4.31MPa
0

st 0.8* pc = 0.61 < 0


Conclusion: bottom fibre of position 2 meets the requirement of serviceability limit State.
2) Top fibre of position 3
Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations
Volume I: Static Analysis

57

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Stress in compression caused by effective prestress pc:
N
N e y
pc = p A + p pn n I = 4.41 MPa
n
n
Stress in tensility caused by short-term action effects:
st = M s W = 4.98MPa
0
Stress in tensility caused by long-term action effects:
lt = M l W = 3.61MPa
0

st pc = 0.57 < 0.7 * ftk = 1.855MPa


lt pc = 0.8 < 0
Conclusion: top fibre of position 3 meets the requirement of serviceability limit State.
(3) Check of stress

1) Top fibre of position 2


Tensile stress caused by effective prestress pt:
N
N e y
pt = p A p pn n I = -0.565 Mpa
n
n
Stress caused by characteristic action effects:

kc =

Mk
8.1 + 64
*0.131 = 6.09 Mpa
y0 =
1.55e 3
I0

kt =

Mk
8.1 + 64
*0.129 = 6.00 Mpa
y0 =
1.55e 3
I0

Stress of prestressing tendons:

p = EP kt =

1.95*105
*6.00 / 0.129*0.069 = 18.14 MPa
3.45*104

The maximum compression stress of concrete:

kc + pt = 6.09 0.565 = 5.525 < 0.5* f ck = 16.2 MPa


The maximum tensile stress of prestressing tendons:

pe + p = 1168.43 + 18.14 = 1186.57 < 0.65* f pk = 1209 MPa


Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations
Volume I: Static Analysis

58

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Conclusion: top fibre of position 2 meets the requirement of stress check.
2) Bottom fibre of position 3
Tensile stress caused by effective prestress pt:
N
N e y
pt = p A p pn n I = -1.59 MPa
n
n
Stress caused by characteristic action effects:

kc =
kt =

Mk
98.4 + 246
*0.276 = 6.38MPa
y0 =
1.49e 2
I0

Mk
98.4 + 246
*0.274 = 6.33MPa
y0 =
1.49e 2
I0

Stress of prestressing tendons:

p = EP kt =

1.95*105
*6.33 / 0.274*0.214 = 27.94MPa
3.45*104

The maximum compression stress of concrete:

kc + pt = 6.38 1.59 = 4.79 < 0.5* f ck = 16.2 MPa


The maximum tensile stress of prestressing tendons:

pe + p = 1168.43 + 27.94 = 1196.37 < 0.65* f pk = 1209 MPa


Conclusion: bottom fibre of position 3 meets the requirement of stress check.
4.1.5.2 Check of top plate in accordance with JTG D60-2004
(1) Ultimate limit state
Table 4.1.5.2-1 Bending moment resistance at ULS in accordance with JTG D60-2004
Position 2

Position 3

Max. design moment (kNm/m)

11.95

136.16

Ultimate moment of resistance (kNm/m)

168.41

591.45

Utilisation ratio

0.07

0.23

(2) Serviceability limit state

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

59

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
1) Bottom fibre of position 2
Stress in compression caused by effective prestress pc:
N
N e y
pc = p A + p pn n I = 6.15MPa
n
n
Stress in tensility caused by short-term action effects:
st = M s W = 1.84MPa
0

st 0.8* pc = 3.081 < 0


Conclusion: bottom fibre of position 2 meets the requirement of serviceability limit State.
2) Top fibre of position 3
Stress in compression caused by effective prestress pc:
N
N e y
pc = p A + p pn n I = 4.41MPa
n
n
Stress in tensility caused by short-term action effects:
st = M s W = 2.90MPa
0

st 0.8* pc = 0.628 < 0


Conclusion: top fibre of position 3 meets the requirement of serviceability limit State.
(3) Check of stress

1) Top fibre of position 2


Tensile stress caused by effective prestress pt:
N
N e y
pt = p A p pn n I = -0.565MPa
n
n
Stress caused by characteristic action effects:

kc =

Mk
8.1 + 26.88
*0.131 = 2.96MPa
y0 =
1.55e3
I0

kt =

Mk
8.1 + 26.88
*0.129 = 2.91MPa
y0 =
1.55e3
I0

Stress of prestressing tendons:

p = EP kt =

1.95*105
* 2.91/ 0.129*0.069 = 8.80MPa
3.45*104

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

60

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
The maximum compression stress of concrete:

kc + pt = 2.96 0.565 = 2.395 < 0.5* f ck = 16.2 MPa


The maximum tensile stress of prestressing tendons:

pe + p = 1168.43 + 8.80 = 1177.23 < 0.65* f pk = 1209 MPa


Conclusion: top fibre of position 2 meets the requirement of stress check.
2) Bottom fibre of position 3:
Tensile stress caused by effective prestress pt:
N
N e y
pt = p A p pn n I = -1.59MPa
n
n
Stress caused by characteristic action effects:

kc =

Mk
98.4 + 109.65
*0.276 = 3.85MPa
y0 =
1.49e2
I0

kt =

Mk
98.4 + 109.65
*0.274 = 3.83MPa
y0 =
1.49e2
I0

Stress of prestressing tendons:


1.95*105
*3.83 / 0.274*0.214 = 16.91MPa
p = EP kt =
3.45*104
The maximum compression stress of concrete:

kc + pt = 3.85 1.59 = 2.26 < 0.5* f ck = 16.2 MPa


The maximum tensile stress of prestressing tendons:

pe + p = 1168.43 + 16.91 = 1185.34 < 0.65* f pk = 1209 MPa


Conclusion: Bottom fibre of position 3 meets the requirement of stress check.

4.2 Check of Bottom Plate


4.2.1 Introduction
Height of box girder varies in secondary-degree parabola, the equation is:

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

61

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
200* x 2
Y = 240 +
cm.
36002
When tensioning the prestressing tendons in the bottom plate, radial force will be generated.
The curvature of box girder height equation:
K=

y
(1 + y2 )

=1
2

32400

The bending radius R = 1

( x=0 at the midspan)

= 324m

During the construction stage, the effective prestress has been taken as 90% of the tension
stress to account for losses, relaxation. The tension force of one j15.24-19 prestressing tendon
is 3339.6kN. The radial force is 10.3kN/m.

4.2.2 Analysis model


A FE model of the concrete girder was created in order to determine the transverse effects.
A unit length long segment at mid span was modeled. The model was vertically supported at the
bottom of the concrete webs. The analysis model is shown in Figure 4.2.2.

Figure 4.2.2 Transverse analysis FE-model

4.2.3 Analysis results


Table 4.2.3 Bending moment in bottom plate of box girder
Max Moment (kN*m/m)
Load
Mid span of bottom plate
Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations
Volume I: Static Analysis

Near web position


62

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
Dead Load

31

-73

Radial Force

16

-49

4.2.4 Check of bottom plate


4.2.4.1 Ultimate Limit State
Table 4.2.4.1 Bending moment resistance in bottom plate of box girder at ULS
Mid span of bottom plate

Near web position

Design moment (kNm/m)

56.4

-146.4

Ultimate moment of resistance (kNm/m)

196

196

Utilisation ratio

0.29

0.75

4.2.4.2 Check of section

Maximum compression stress of concrete:

c =11.2MPa
Maximum tensile stress of rebar:

t =171.5MPa
Conclusion: stress of concrete and rebar meets the requirement of stress check.

4.3 Counterweight Calculation at Bridge End


4.3.1 Introduction
Maximum uplift bearing reaction is 212kN in SLS when have no counterweight according
to BS5400. So counterweight is necessary for this bridge.
The arrangement of counterweight is shown in the Figure 4.3.1.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

63

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations

Figure 4.3.1 Arrangement of counterweight

4.3.2 Results of bearing reactions


Positive bearing reaction is 60.2kN in SLS when have the counterweight.

4.3.3 Check of bottom plate


4.3.3.1 Ultimate limit state
Table 4.3.3.1 Bending moment resistance in bottom plate of box girder at ULS
Midspan of Bottom Plate

Near Web Position

Design moment (kNm/m)

319

-394.8

Ultimate moment of resistance (kNm/m)

1099

1099

Utilisation ratio

0.29

0.36

4.3.3.2 Serviceability Limit State

Maximum compression stress of concrete:

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

64

CCCC HIGHWAY & BRIDGE CONSULTANTS CO., LTD


F6, Botai Mansion, Wangjing Xi Yuan No. 221, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China
http://www.ccgbt.com
Tel: 86-10-64789480
Fax: 86-10-64789499

Calculations
c =6.82MPa
Maximum tensile stress of rebar:

t = 85.46MPa
Conclusion: Stress of concrete and rebar meets the requirement.

Suramadu Bridge, Approach Bridge, Calculations


Volume I: Static Analysis

65

S-ar putea să vă placă și