Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Department of Engineering
CECE 4131
Prerequisites:
Goal
GEOTECHNICAL
3 Credit Hours
ENGINEERING - II
CECE2230
To introduce the student to the principles of soil mechanics
and to enable him/her to apply such principles to civil
engineering problems
Objectives
Outcomes
1|Page
Department of Engineering
: 67-69 (C grade)*
Grade
A
AB+
B
BC+
C
CD
F
GPA
4.0
3.7
3.3
3.0
2.7
2.3
2.0
1.7
1.0
0.0
Assessment Methods
2T+2P Courses
Theory (T)
Practical (P)
Course work
Quizzes (T)
Structured assignments (T)/
Assignment/Homework
20 marks
Lab report
60 marks
Written Questionnaire
40 marks
10 marks
20 marks
Final Examination(T)
50 marks
2/3 x Theoretical part marks + 1/3 x Practical part marks= Total marks out of 100
Assessment Procedure
1.
2.
No. of Assignments: 2
3.
4.
2|Page
Department of Engineering
Quizzes (Announced)
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
10Marks
10Marks
10Marks
10Marks
Best 2
20Marks
10Marks
10Marks
Total
10Marks
Average
60Marks
Best 2
40Marks
Assignments
Assingment.1
Assingment.2
60 Marks
60 Marks
60 Marks
60 Marks
60 Marks
60 Marks
60 Marks
60 Marks
10Marks
10Marks
10Marks
All topics covered in the given materials will be included in the exams.
Valid college ID card is a must to attend Midterm and Final examination.
Attendance:
Issuing of Warning Letter
Percentage
Number of Hours
First
10%
Second
20%
Third
30%
If the absence reaches 30%, the student will be debarred from the final exam and will get ZERO
in the final exam.
Course Code-Course Name
3|Page
Department of Engineering
A student will be considered as LATE when s/he arrives after 10minutes of the class start time.
Being LATE for THREE times in a class will be considered as ONE class absence.
The full course delivery plan must be covered. If students are absent without a valid reason, it
will be considered as if the topic/s is already covered and will be included in exams.
If a student is absent for two continuous weeks within the semester in all courses, s/he will be
DISMISSED from the College.
Absence Excuse:
If a student failed to attend any class, s/he has to submit the original excuse document
within one week from the date of absence to registration department only.
If a student failed to attend midterm or final exam, s/he has to fill in a Supplementary Exam
Form attached with the original excuse stamped from concern authorities and submit it to
the registration department within one week from the exam date.Hospital/Clinic Attendance
Certificate is not accepted as a valid excuse.
The coverage of topics in the midterm supplementary exam will include topics covered up
tothe midterm exam + topics covered one week after the midterm exam.
The final complementary exam will be conducted within four weeks from the start of next
semester.
Course Withdrawal
A student is allowed to withdraw one course during the semester. The withdrawal period will end a
week after the midterm exam result announcement.
4|Page
Department of Engineering
Referencing
Referencing or citing the sources used for your assignment is an important part of academic writing. It
is a way of acknowledging the ideas or words of others if you use them in your work. It helps avoid
plagiarism. It is evidence that you have read relevant background literature and you can provide
authority for statements you make in your assignments.
The Harvard Citation Style is the most common style of referencing; hence, it is suggested you use it
for referencing the sources you have used in your assignment or project. Please refer to the link below
for more details:
http://www.staffs.ac.uk/assets/harvard_referencing_examples_tcm44-39847.pdf
(Any citation style suitable for the course can be followed)
Plagiarism
Plagiarism occurs when others work such as print material, images, audio-visual creations,
computer programs, electronic materials, etc. are used without appropriate acknowledgement.
Plagiarism includes , but not limited to, the following:
5|Page
Department of Engineering
TEXTBOOKS
Course code
CECE4131
Course Title
Geotechnical
Engineering-II
College Physics
Serway/Faughn
0-534-40814-1
Thomson Brookes/Cole
Outcomes
covered
15/15
REFRENCE BOOKS
Course code
Course Title
S.No.
1
CECE4131
Geotechnical
Engineering - II
Outcomes
covered
15/15
College Physics
Brooks/Cole
9780321689870
Jim Smith
1|Page
14/15
Department of Engineering
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SN
Chapter 1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
Chapter 2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
Chapter 3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
Chapter 4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
Contents
Earth Pressure
Introduction
Active Earth Pressure
Passive Earth pressure
Rankines active Earth Pressure Theory
Coulombs Wedge Theory
Example Problems
Bearing Capacity
Definitions
Modes of failure
Terzaghis bearing Capacity Theory
Effect of water Table
Example Problems in bearing capacity
Retaining Walls and Foundation Design
Introduction about retaining wall
Design Procedure of retaining wall
Example Problem
Introduction about foundation
Design of Isolated Square Footing
Design of Rectangular footing
Design of Combined footing
Stability of Slopes
Introduction
Stability analysis of Finite slope
Stability analysis of infinite slope
Example problems
Chapter 5
5.1
5.2
5.3
Page number
42
Pile Foundations
Types of piles
Load carrying capacity of piles
Dynamic Formulae
2|Page
Department of Engineering
CHAPTER 1
Earth Pressure
Chapter Outline
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
Introduction
Active Earth Pressure
Passive Earth pressure
Rankines active Earth
1.5
1.6
Pressure Theory
Coulombs Wedge Theory
Example Problems
2.e Introduction
Course Code-Course Name
3|Page
Department of Engineering
4|Page
Department of Engineering
During the active state, the wall moves away from backfill and a certain portion of
backfill located immediately behind the wall breaks away from the rest of the soil
mass. This wedge shape portion of soil is called failure wedge. The resisting force
due to shear strength of soil is developed in an upward direction along the failure
plane (or slip lines) as shown in Fig.
When the soil moves away from the backfill, mobilization of the internal
resistance of the soil, which builds up in directions away from the wall takes place
and hence earth pressure on the wall decreases. The decrease of earth pressure
Course Code-Course Name
5|Page
Department of Engineering
continues upto a point until the full resistance has been mobilized. The earth
pressure does not decrease beyond this point with further movement of the wall
and is called as active earth pressure.
In passive case the wall moves towards the fill, due to some thrust etc.The
magnitude of the lateral earth pressure depends upon the movement of the wall
relative to the backfill and upon the nature of soil or fill.
If on the other hand, the wall moves towards the fill, the earth pressure
increases, because the shearing resistance builds up in direction towards wall.
The pressure reaches at the point when the shearing resistance of the soil has
6|Page
Department of Engineering
been fully mobilized. Any further movement of the wall does not increase the
pressure. The maximum pressure is called the passive earth pressure
1.4 Rankines active Earth Pressure Theory
Rankines Theory: As originally proposed, Rankines theory of lateral earth
pressure is applied to uniform cohisionless soil only. Later it was extended to
cohesive soils by Resal and Bell. The theory has also been extended to stratified,
partially immersed and submerged soil. This theory is valid when:
The back of the wall is vertical and smooth
The level of the soil behind the wall is horizontal
Rankines Theory assumes that failure will occur when the maximum principal stress at
any point reaches a value equal to the tensile stress in a simple tension specimen at failure.
This theory does not take into account the effect of the other two principal stresses.
Rankines theory is satisfactory for brittle materials, and not applicable to ductile
materials. This theory is also called the Maximum Stress Theory.
The Rankine theory assumes a frictionless soil-wall interface and a vertical wall (no wall
slope).
7|Page
Department of Engineering
1.5 Coulombs theory: He highlighted that if the wall is not friction less
unlike assumed in Rankines case the lateral earth pressure applied by the
soil is not normal to the wall but at an angle or in other word has both
horizontal and a vertical components.
Solutions from the coulomb theory can be obtained from the
situations when the back of the wall is not vertical but is inclined at an
angle to the horizontal and the soil behind the wall is not horizontal but
inclined at an angle to the horizontal
Assumptions:
The backfill is dry and cohesionless, homogeneous, istropic
and elastically undeformable but breakable.
The slip surface is the plane which passes through the heel of the
wall.
The sliding wedge itself acts as a rigid body and the value of
earth pressure is obtained by considering the limiting equilibrium of the
sliding wedge as a whole.
8|Page
Department of Engineering
9|Page
Department of Engineering
10 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
11 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
12 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
CHAPTER 2
Bearing Capacity
Chapter Outline
2.1
2.2
2.3
Definitions
Modes of failure
Terzaghis bearing Capacity
2.4
2.5
Theory
Effect of water Table
Example Problems
2.e Definitions
Bearing capacity is the power of foundation soil to hold the forces from the
superstructure without undergoing shear failure or excessive settlement.
Foundation soil is that portion of ground which is subjected to additional stresses
when foundation and superstructure are constructed on the ground. The following
are a few important terminologies related to bearing capacity of soil.
13 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
qn
qo
F
14 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
is to ensure that both foundation and soil below are safe against failure and do not
experience excessive settlement. Footing and foundation are synonymous.
2.2 Modes of shear failure
Depending on the stiffness of foundation soil and depth of foundation,
the
following are the modes of shear failure experienced by the foundation soil.
1. General shear failure
2. Local shear failure
3. Punching shear failure
15 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
2. Dense or stiff soil that undergoes low compressibility experiences this failure.
3. Continuous bulging of shear mass adjacent to footing is visible.
4. Failure is accompanied by tilting of footing.
5. Failure is sudden and catastrophic with pronounced peak in P curve.
6. The length of disturbance beyond the edge of footing is large.
7. State of plastic equilibrium is reached initially at the footing edge and spreads
gradually downwards and outwards.
8. General shear failure is accompanied by low strain (<5%) in a soil with
considerable (>36o) and large N (N > 30) having high relative density (I D >
70%).
Local Shear Failure
This type of failure is seen in relatively loose and soft soil. The following are some
characteristics of general shear failure.
1. A significant compression of soil below the footing and partial development of
plastic equilibrium is observed.
2. Failure is not sudden and there is no tilting of footing.
3. Failure surface does not reach the ground surface and slight bulging of soil
around the footing is observed.
4. Failure surface is not well defined.
5. Failure is characterized by considerable settlement.
6. Well defined peak is absent in P curve.
7. Local shear failure is accompanied by large strain (> 10 to 20%) in a soil with
considerably low (<28o) and low N (N < 5) having low relative density (I D
> 20%).
Punching Shear Failure
Course Code-Course Name
16 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
This type of failure is seen in loose and soft soil and at deeper elevations. The
following are some characteristics of general shear failure.
1. This type of failure occurs in a soil of very high compressibility.
2. Failure pattern is not observed.
3. Bulging of soil around the footing is absent.
4. Failure is characterized by very large settlement.
5. Continuous settlement with no increase in P is observed in P curve.
Fig. presents the conditions for different failure modes in sandy soil carrying
circular footing based on the contributions from Vesic (1963 & 1973)
17 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
spread
neighbourhood of footing
of Extent of horizontal spread
of
observed
observed
18 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
7. Passive pressure force has three components (PPC produced by cohesion, PPq
produced by surcharge and PP produced by weight of shear zone).
8. Effect of water table is neglected.
9. Footing carries concentric and vertical loads.
10.Footing and ground are horizontal.
11.Limit equilibrium is reached simultaneously at all points. Complete shear
failure is mobilized at all points at the same time.
12.The properties of foundation soil do not change during the shear failure
Limitations
1. The theory is applicable to shallow foundations
2. As the soil compresses, increases which is not considered. Hence fully plastic
zone may not develop at the assumed .
3. All points need not experience limit equilibrium condition at different loads.
4. Method of superstition is not acceptable in plastic conditions as the ground is
near failure zone.
19 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
Fig. Terzaghis concept of Footing with five distinct failure zones in foundation
soil
Concept
A strip footing of width B gradually compresses the foundation soil underneath due
to the vertical load from superstructure. Let q f be the final load at which the
foundation soil experiences failure due to the mobilization of plastic equilibrium.
The foundation soil fails along the composite failure surface and the region is
divided in to five zones, Zone 1 which is elastic, two numbers of Zone 2 which are
the zones of radial shear and two zones of Zone 3 which are the zones of linear
shear. Considering horizontal force equilibrium and incorporating empirical
relation, the equation for ultimate bearing capacity is obtained as follows.
Ultimate bearing capacity,
q f cN c DN q 0.5BN
q n cN c DN q 0.5BN D
20 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
q n cN c D ( N q 1) 0.5BN
qs cN c D ( N q 1) 0.5BN
F1 D
Nc
Nq
Ng
Nc
Nq
Ng
5.7
1.0
0.0
5.7
1.0
0.0
7.3
1.6
0.5
6.7
1.4
0.2
10
9.6
2.7
1.2
8.0
1.9
0.5
15
12.9
4.4
2.5
9.7
2.7
0.9
20
17.7
7.4
5.0
11.8
3.9
1.7
25
25.1
12.7
9.7
14.8
5.6
3.2
30
37.2
22.5
19.7
19.0
8.3
5.7
34
52.6
36.5
35.0
23.7
11.7
9.0
35
57.8
41.4
42.4
25.2
12.6
10.1
40
95.7
81.3
100.4
34.9
20.5
18.8
45
172.3
173.3
297.5
51.2
35.1
37.7
48
258.3
287.9
780.1
66.8
50.5
60.4
21 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
50
347.6
415.1 1153.2
81.3
65.6
87.1
Fig
Terzaghis Bearing Capacity Factors for different
22 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
Circular footing
q f 1.3cN c DN q 0.3BN
Square footing
q f 1.3cN c DN q 0.4BN
Rectangular footing
q f (1 0.3
B
B
)cN c DN q (1 0.2 )0.5BN
L
L
sc
1
1.3
1.3
(1 0.3
B
)
L
sq
1
1
1
s
1
0.8
0.6
(1 0.2
B
)
L
23 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
2
tan
3
2
c
3
Table summarizes the bearing capacity factors to be used under different situations.
If is less than 36o and more than 28o, it is not sure whether the failure is of
general or local shear type. In such situations, linear interpolation can be made and
the region is called mixed zone.
Table Bearing capacity factors in zones of local, mixed and general shear
conditions.
Local Shear Failure
< 28o
Nc1, Nq1, N1
Mixed Zone
28o < < 36o
Ncm, Nqm, Nm
24 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
Z
1
Here, Rw1 2 1 Dw1
25 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
Here, Rw 2 2 1 Bw2
26 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
27 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
Density of soil : In geotechnical engineering, one deals with several densities such
as dry density, bulk density, saturated density and submerged density. There will
always be a doubt in the students mind as to which density to use in a particular
case. In case of Bearing capacity problems, the following methodology may be
adopted.
1. Always use dry density as it does not change with season and it is always
smaller than bulk or saturated density.
Course Code-Course Name
28 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
1 D1 2 D2
D1 D2
29 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
30 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
31 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
9. Red curve indicates the general shear failure & the blue one indicates the
local or punching shear failure.
10.The maximum load at which the shear failure occurs gives the ultimate
bearing capacity of soil.
The advantages of Plate Load Test are
1. It provides the allowable bearing pressure at the location considering both
shear failure and settlement.
2. Being a field test, there is no requirement of extracting soil samples.
3. The loading techniques and other arrangements for field testing are identical
to the actual conditions in the field.
4. It is a fast method of estimating ABP and P 32evelled of ground.
The disadvantages of Plate Load Test are
1. The test results reflect the 32evelled of soil below the plate (for a distance of
~2Bp), not that of actual footing which is generally very large.
2. It is essentially a short duration test. Hence, it does not reflect the long term
consolidation settlement of clayey soil.
3. Size effect is pronounced in granular soil. Correction for size effect is
essential in such soils.
4. It is a cumbersome procedure to carry equipment, apply huge load and carry
out testing for several days in the tough field environment.
32 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
33 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
34 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
Fig
typical set up for Static Cone Penetration test assembly
1. Reference can be made to IS 4968 (P3) 1987 for details on Standard
Penetration Test.
2. Cone Penetration Test can either be Static Cone Penetration Test or Dynamic
Cone Penetration Test.
3. Continuous record of penetration resistance with depth is achieved.
4. Consists of a cone 36 mm dia (1000 mm2) and 60o vertex angle.
5. Cone is carried at the lower end of steel rod that passes through steel tube of
36 mm dia.
6. Either the cone, or the tube or both can be forced in to the soil by jacks.
7. Cone is pushed 80 mm in to the ground and resistance is recorded, steel tube
is pushed up to the cone and resistance is recorded. Further, both cone and
35 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
It is the bearing capacity that can be presumed in the absence of data based on
visual identification at the site. National Building Code of India (1983) lists the
values of presumptive SBC in kPa for different soils as presented below.
A : Rocks
Sl
No
Description
SBC (kPa)
36 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
1
2
3
4
3240
1620
880
440
B : Cohesionless Soils
Sl
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
Description
SBC (kPa)
440
440
245
150
245
100
C : Cohesive Soils
Sl
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
Description
SBC (kPa)
440
245
150
100
50
130 160
Note :
1. Use d for all cases without water. Use sat for calculations with water. If
simply density is mentioned use accordingly.
2. Fill all the available data with proper units.
3. Write down the required formula
4. If the given soil is sand, c = 0
Course Code-Course Name
37 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
P
P
1
2 1.3cN c D( N q 1) RW 1 0.4BN RW 2
D
A B
F
B = 1.21 m
2. What will be the net ultimate bearing capacity of sand having = 36o and d =
19 kN/m3 for (i) 1.5 m strip foundation and (ii) 1.5 m X 1.5 m square footing.
The footings are placed at a depth of 1.5 m below ground level. Assume F =
2.5. Use Terzaghis equations. (Aug 2003)
35o
40o
Nc
57.8
95.7
Nq
41.4
81.3
N
42.4
100.4
38 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
qn = 2148.33 kPa
Square Footing
q n 1.3cN c D ( N q 1) 0.4BN
qn = 1994.43 kPa
3. A square footing 2.5 m X 2.5 m is built on a homogeneous bed of sand of
density 19 kN/m3 having an angle of shearing resistance of 36 o. The depth of
foundation is 1.5 m below the ground surface. Calculate the safe load that can
be applied on the footing with a factor of safety of 3. Take bearing capacity
factors as Nc= 27, Nq = 30, N = 35. (Feb 2004)
Data
C=0
F=3
B = 2.5 m
D = 1.5 m
= 19 kN/m3
Nc = 27
Nq = 30
N = 35
39 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
qs
P
P
1
2 1.3cN c D( N q 1) RW 1 0.4BN RW 2
D
A B
F
q s 400 cN c D ( N q 1) RW 1 0.5BN RW 2
F1 D
40 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
F = 4.02
b. Water table is 1.2 m below Ground Level
RW1 = 1, RW2 = 0.5
400 16.8 X 1.2 X 40.4 X 1 0.5 X 19.5 X 2 X 42.4 X 0.5
1
16.8 X 1.2
F
F = 3.227
c. Water table is 2.5 m below Ground Level
RW2 = 0.5(1+1.3/2) = 0.825
eff
1
16.8 X 1.2
F
F = 3.779
d. Water table is at Ground Level
RW1 = RW2 = 0.5
= 19.5 kN/m3
400 19.5 X 1.2 X 40.4 X 0.5 0.5 X 19.5 X 2 X 42.4 X 0.5
1
19.5 X 1.2
F
F = 2.353
5. A square footing located at a depth of 1.3 m below ground has to carry a safe
load of 800 kN. Find the size of footing if the desired factor of safety is 3. Use
Terzaghis analysis for general shear failure. Take c = 8 kPa, N c = 37.2, Nq =
22.5, N = 19.7.
d = 18 kN/m3 (Assumed)
c = 8 kPa
F=3
Course Code-Course Name
41 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
D = 1.3 m
Nc = 37.2
Nq = 22.5
N = 19.7
P = 800 kN
RW1 = RW2 = 1
qs
P
P
1
2 1.3cN c D( N q 1) RW 1 0.4BN RW 2
D
A B
F
B = 1.436 m
6. A square footing 2.8 m X 2.8 m is built on a homogeneous bed of sand of
density 18 kN/m3 and = 36o. If the depth of foundation is 1.8 m, determine the
safe load that can be applied on the footing. Take F = 2.5, Nc = 27, Nq = 36, N
= 35.
Data
d = 18 kN/m3
c = 0 (sand)
F = 2.5
B = 2.8 m
D = 1.8 m
Nc = 27
Nq = 36
N = 35
P=?
RW1 = RW2 = 1
qs
P
P
1
2 1.3cN c D( N q 1) RW 1 0.4BN RW 2
D
A B
F
42 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
P = qs*B*B = 6023 kN
7. A strip footing 1 m wide and a square footing 1 m side are placed at a depth of 1
m below the ground surface. The foundation soil has cohesion of 10 kPa, angle
of friction of 26o and unit weight of 18 kN/m3. Taking bearing capacity factor
from the following table, calculate the safe bearing capacity using Terzaghis
theory. Use factor of safety of 3.
15o
20o
25o
Nc
12.9
17.7
25.1
Nq
4.4
7.0
12.7
N
2.5
5.0
9.7
q s cN c D ( N q 1) 0.5BN
F1 D =94.96 kPa
Square footing
q s 1.3cN c D ( N q 1) 0.4BN
F1 D =103.08 kPa
43 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
Data
C = 10 kPa
= 38o
B=?
D=1m
= 19 kN/m3
Nc = 61.35
Nq = 48.93
N = 74.03
F=3
RW1 = 1
RW2 = 0.5
qs
P
P
1
2 1.3cN c D( N q 1) RW 1 0.4BN RW 2
D
A B
F
B 3 6.14 B 2 3.56 0
B = 0.72 m
CHAPTER 3
Design of Retaining wall and Foundation
Chapter Outline
44 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
3.1
3.2
wall
Design Procedure of
3.3
3.4
3.5
retaining wall
Example Problem
Introduction for foundation
Design of Isolated Square
3.6
Footing
Design of Rectangular
3.7
footing
Design of Combined footing
45 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
46 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
47 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
48 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
49 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
50 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
SBC
1 sin
1+ sin
Proportioning of wall:
Thickness of base slab=(1/10 to1/14)H
0.52m to 0.43m, say 450 mm
Width of base slab=b = (0.5 to 0.6) H
2.6m to 3.12m say 3m
Toe projection= pj= (1/3 to )H
1m to 0.75m say 0.75m
Provide 450 mm thickness for the stem at the base and 200 mm at the top
Course Code-Course Name
51 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
Design of stem
= 107.1 kN-m
To find steel
Pt=0.295% <0.96%
52 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
Curtailment of bars-Stem
53 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
Design of stem-Contd.,
54 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
55 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
56 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
57 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
58 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
59 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
60 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
= 200000N/m2
Area of the foundation = Total load / Safe bearing capacity of the soil.
= 880000/200000 = 4.40 m2
To find the length and breadth of the foundation
in case of square footing its easy because by taking square root we get all the
values
Area = 4.4
BL = 4.4
B= 4.4 /L
Equating the projections on both sides beyond the footing
( B-0.4) = (L-0.6)
Sub B Value
( {4.4/L}-0.4) = (L-0.6)
Solving the above equation we get L = 2.2 m
Sub this is B value we get
B= 4.4/L = 4.4/ 2.2 = 2 m
Now find the projections on both the axis
= 0.8 m
Net upward pressure = column load / Area of the footing
= 800000/4.4
=181820 N/m2
Determination of reinforcement in section xx axis and YY axis.
Bending moment Myy = 181820 X 2.2X 0.8 X (0.8/2).
= 128000 Nm
Factored Moment Muy = 128000 X 1.5
= 192000 Nm
Determine the depth
Muy = 0.138 Fck bd2
192000 = 0.138 x 20 x 600 x d2
d= 341 mm.
Bending moment Mxx = 181820 X 2 X 0.8 X (0.8/2).
= 116364.8 Nm
Factored Moment Mux = 116364.8 X 1.5
= 174547.2Nm
Determine the depth
Mux = 0.138 Fck bd2
174547.2 = 0.138 x 20 x 400 x d2
d= 398 mm.
From the above two depth take the greater one
d= 398 mm
Providing 10 mm dia bars at a clear cover of 70 mm
D = 398 + (10/2) + 70 = 473 mm
The overall depth may increased by 30%
= 473 + (0.3 X473)
= 614.9 mm
Course Code-Course Name
61 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
D=620 mm.
Effective Depth of the footing
d= 620 (10/2) 70
= 545 mm.
Take Muy and find Longer direction steel
Factored Moment Muy = 128000 X 1.5
= 192000 Nm
Determination of quantity of steel required:
Ast = Pt X b x d
Sub b= 600mm
d=545mm
Fck=20N/mm2
Fe=415 N/mm2
In the Pt formula and find Pt
Pt=0.32 %
Ast =( 0.32/100) X600 x545=1046.4mm2
62 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
63 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
Design Steps
Locate the point of application of the column
loads on the footing.
Proportion the footing such that the resultant of loads passes through the center
of footing.
Compute the area of footing such that the allowable soil pressure is not
exceeded.
Calculate the shear forces and bending moments at the salient points and hence
draw SFD and BMD.
Fix the depth of footing from the maximum bending moment.
Calculate the transverse bending moment and design the transverse section for
depth and reinforcement. Check for anchorage and shear.
Design of combined footing
Slab and Beam type
1. Two interior columns A and B carry 700 kN and 1000 kN loads respectively.
Column A is 350 mm x 350 mm and column B is 400 mm X 400 mm in section.
The centre to centre spacing between columns is 4.6 m. The soil on which the
footing rests is capable of providing resistance of 130 kN/m 2. Design a combined
footing by providing a central beam joining the two columns. Use concrete grade
M25 and mild steel reinforcement.
Solution: Data
fck = 25 Nlmm2,
fy= 250 N/mm2,
fb = l30 kN/m2 (SBC),
Column A = 350 mm x 350 mm,
Column B = 400 mm x 400 mm,
c/c spacing of columns = 4.6 m,
PA = 700 kN and PB = 1000 kN
Required: To design combined footing with central beam joining the two
columns.
Ultimate loads
PuA= 1.5 x 700 = 1050 kN, PuB = 1.5 x 1000 = 1500 kN
64 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
65 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
CHAPTER 4
Stability of slopes
Chapter Outline
4.1
4.2
Introduction
Stability analysis of Finite
4.3
slope
Stability analysis of infinite
4.4
slope
Example problems
4.1 Introduction
Earth embankments are commonly required for Railways, Roadways, Earth
Dams, Levees and River training works. The stability of those embankments or slopes,
should be thoroughly analyzed, since their failure my lead to loss of human life, as well
as economic loss.
I. The failure of a mass soil located beneath a slope is called slide. It involves the
movement of soil mass either downward or outward from the position.
Types of slopes: 1) Infinite slope 2) Finite slope
4.2Finite slope:
If the slope is of limited extent of it s boundary, it is called finite slope
4.3Infinite slope:
If a slopes represents the boundary surface of a semi-infinite soil mass, and the
soil properties for all depth below the surface are constant, it is called infinite slope.
Modes of slope failure: An exposed ground surface that stands at an angle with
the horizontal is called unrestrained slope.
The slope can be natural or man-made.
It can fails in various modes
The failures are classified in to five major categories:
1. Fall 2. Topple
3. Slide
4. Spread 5. Flow
Fall: this is the detachment of Soil and or Rock fragments that fall down a slope, and
large amount of soil mass has slide down a slop.
Topple: this is a forward rotation of Soil/Rock mass about an axis below the centre of
gravity of mass being displaced.
Course Code-Course Name
66 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
67 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
68 | P a g e
Department of Engineering
References
1) Text Books
Example:
King, M. (2000).Wrestling with the angel: A life of Janet Frame. Auckland, New Zealand: Viking.
2) Reference Books
Example:
King, M. (2000).Wrestling with the angel: A life of Janet Frame. Auckland, New Zealand: Viking.
3) Web sites
Example:
Hobbit Team. (2011, November 5). 3D concept sketch [Web log message]. Retrieved from
http://www.thehobbitblog.com/
69 | P a g e