Noah

The Exodus Happened 2450 B.C. 94 pages. $12.95. Click for

details.
The Biblical Chronologist Age of the Earth Collection. 74 pages.
$12.95. Click for details.
A New Approach to the Chronology of Biblical
History from Abraham to Samuel. 2nd edition. 112 pages. $12.95. Click for
details.

Advanced Search

Sign Up

New Content
e-mail list

Home

home page

About

The BC
Dr. Gerald E. Aardsma
ARP

Topics
Overview

Biblical Chronology

relevance
missing millennium

Dendrochronology

reliability

Radiocarbon Dating

basics
precision
assumptions
invalidated?

Mt. Sinai

location
Saudi Arabia

Jericho

conquest of
Wood's chronology

Ai

conquest of
FEATURE

The Exodus

conventional dates
evidence from Egypt
evidence from Sinai

Noah's Ark

search for
Ark before Noah?

Imhotep/Joseph

Is Imhotep Joseph?

Contact Us

E-mail us

Correspondence

antiquity of mankind
ark search
Bible chronology
"The BC" publication
Bryant Wood's critique
calendars
Heshbon
horses and chariots in Egypt
Jericho --- Joshua's curse
lifespan research
missing millennium: reception
missing millennium: textual
Mt. Sinai
Noah's Flood
Philistines
radiocarbon
teaching science and creation
the Exodus
tree rings
virtual history

Resources
books

A New Approach...
Age of the Earth Collection

Noah's Flood Happened 3520 B.C.

The Exodus Happened 2450 B.C.

newsletters

Volume 1 (1995)
Volume 2 (1996)
Volume 3 (1997)
Volume 4 (1998)
Volume 5 (1999)
Volume 6 (2000)
Volume 7 (2001)
Volume 8 (2002)
Volume 9 (2008)

time charts
What's wrong with the conventional dates for the Exodus?
The following article is based on Dr. Aardsma's book A New Approach to the
Chronology of Biblical History from Abraham to Samuel. A more thorough
discussion can be found there.

Conflict with Biblical Chronology in Judges and 1 Samuel

Both of the conventional dates for the Exodus, (ca. 1450 and ca. 1250 B.C.),
conflict with biblical chronological data.

The so-called "early date" of ca. 1450 B.C. comes from combining the "480
years" (between the Exodus and Solomon's fourth year as king) of 1 Kings 6:1

with the accepted date for the beginning of Solomon's reign, ca. 970 B.C.

However, in Judges and 1 Samuel the Bible seems to indicate that the time
between the Exodus and Samuel was longer. This biblical chronological
conflict is easily seen by adding up the well-known 40 years of wilderness
wandering, 410 years of alternating periods of oppression and deliverance
recorded in the book of Judges, 40 years for the career of Eli, 40 years for the
reign of Saul, and 40 years for the reign of David. This already totals 570
years, though it does not include the time during which Joshua led Israel, nor
the career of Samuel, and these two periods of time, while not specified
biblically, must certainly total to something greater than 30 years (they
probably total close to 80 years in fact).

Thus, the biblical stipulation of 480 years from the Exodus to Solomon given
in 1 Kings 6:1 conflicts with the greater than 600 year total for this same time
period which one can calculate from chronological data given elsewhere in
the Bible. As a result, the "early date" conflicts with these other biblical
chronological data.

The so-called "late date" fares even worse. It is consistent with no biblical
chronological data. It was motivated by certain archaeological data in Israel,
which looked more suitable to the Conquest, down around 1200 B.C.
Conflict with Biblical Chronology in Acts 13

Acts 13:16-20 reads:

For some forty years he bore with their conduct in the desert. Then in the
Canaanite country he overthrew seven nations, whose lands he gave them to
be their heritage for some four hundred and fifty years, and afterwards
appointed judges for them until the time of the prophet Samuel. (NEB)

This translation follows the reading of the earliest manuscripts. It clearly

specifies a period of 450 years after the period of wilderness wandering and
before the time of Samuel. In fact, the text seems to indicate a period of 450
years, followed by a period of judges of unspecified duration "until the time of

the prophet Samuel." This 450 years does not include the wilderness
wandering, Saul's reign, or David's reign, all of which transpired between the
Exodus and Solomon. Thus Acts 13 is consistent with the chronological data
in Judges and I Samuel, but in conflict with the "480 years" of 1 Kings 6:1.
Conflict with the Archaeology of Egypt

The biblical record claims rather forcefully that the Exodus was immediately
preceded by a whole series of national disasters in Egypt. These included the
complete pollution of the Nile, infestation of the land with frogs, gnats (or
lice), and great swarms of insects, death of all Egyptian livestock, boils on all
the people, destruction on all standing grains by hail, stripping of all
vegetation in the land by locusts, complete darkness in the land for three
days, and finally, death of all first-born sons throughout the land of Egypt.
Furthermore, the Israelites not only deprived Egypt of its slave labor when
they left, they also despoiled the land by carrying away much of its wealth in
the form of gold, silver and clothing (Exodus 12:36). And, finally, the pharaoh
and his army were drowned (Exodus 14:5-15:21), depriving the nation of its
armed forces.

One would certainly expect to find the mark of this national disaster in the
archaeological record of Egypt. Events of this sort are not difficult to locate
archaeologically. However, at the traditional ca. 1447 B.C. date for the Exodus
the opposite is found. Egypt is seen to be prospering.

The "late date" for the Exodus fares no better. Merneptah left a record of his
military success in Palestine in which he mentions that he decimated Israel.
This single inscription guarantees that Israel was established as a nation in
Palestine by the reign of Merneptah, forcing the date of the Exodus into the
early part of the reign of Ramesses II at the latest. But, as with the "early
date" above, there is no sign of anything which could possibly correspond to
the biblical Exodus in the reign of this pharaoh or his immediate
predecessors. Life carried on as usual in Egypt all through this time.
Conflict with the Archaeology at Jericho

The illustration below shows the history of Jericho as reconstructed from

archaeological reports. The dashed line represents a campsite, the solid lines
represent an unwalled town, and the rectangles represent a walled city. The

letter 'A' marks the traditional early date for Joshua's Conquest of Canaan, 'B'
marks the traditional late date.

The Bible is clear that Joshua and his army conquered a walled city at Jericho.
It is immediately apparent that the two traditional dates for the conquest (ca.
1407 B.C. and ca. 1250 B.C.) are in conflict with the archaeology of Jericho.
Conflict with the Archaeology at Ai

The illustration below shows the history of et-Tell, the modern ruins
associated by almost all scholars with the biblical Ai. Again, the solid lines
represent an unwalled town, and the rectangles represent a walled city. The
letters 'A' and 'B', mark the early and late dates for the Conquest,
respectively.

Once again, it is clear that the archaeology of Ai is incompatible with the

conventional dates for the Conquest.

Since et-Tell is clearly incompatible with both the early and the late dates for
the Conquest, some have suggested that et-Tell is not the biblical Ai at all.
However, the geography, archaeology, and topography of Ai fit the biblical
account. It is only the traditional biblical chronology date that doesn't fit.
Conclusion

The lack of secular archaeological/historical evidence for the Exodus and

Conquest at the conventional dates has caused most scholars today to
conclude that the Bible's accounts of the Exodus and Conquest are fictitious.
THIS IS THE WRONG CONCLUSION. The conventional dates are all that is
wrong. They are faulted both biblically and archaeologically, as seen above.
They are, in fact, a thousand years too recent. (See What is the missing
millennium discovery?)
The foregoing article was based on Dr. Aardsma's book A New Approach to
the Chronology of Biblical History from Abraham to Samuel. A more thorough
discussion can be found there.

http://www.biblicalchronologist.org/answers/wrongdates.php