Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Reginold, J.T.
University of East London, Dockland, United Kingdom
ABSTRACT: Soil-pipe interaction studies can help in the evaluation of settlement of pipelines. However, pipeline failures still
occur due to differential ground movements between a heavy yielding structure and a pipeline firmly connected to it. Such
differential movements induce excessive stress concentrations in the pipeline. Often pipeline failures are a consequence of such
movements, and the flexibility of plastic pipes can make them less vulnerable than rigid pipes.
The magnitude and location of the maximum bending moments in pipelines arising from the yielding of the heavy structure can be
determined by treating pipelines as beams on elastic foundation,. The provision of rocker pipe joints that entertain a permissible
rotation helps to redistribute the bending moments to acceptable levels and thereby alleviate distress in the pipeline. This paper
presents both a theoretical approach and a laboratory approach to the evaluation of the bending moment, shear force, vertical soil
resistance at soil pipe interface due to differential settlement and also assess the benefits of rocker joints to alleviate the distress in
pipelines. Innovative experimentation used in the laboratory research programme is presented.
The paper further presents results from a laboratory investigation of the soil structure interaction of flexible strip foundations and
articulated pipelines, with a view to establishing a method of assessing the distribution of soil sub grade reaction that is developed
as a consequence of non-uniform settlement. The influence of the stiffness of the structure on the soil reaction distribution is also
demonstrated and the effect of the various distributions on the bending moment distribution of the pipe is discussed. A few case
histories of failures are summarised, demonstrating these effects, and pointing the way to possible solutions, which could be
incorporated at the project design stage. Finally, the need for rational design procedures for pipeline foundations including rocker
pipes to be incorporated into codes of practice such as EN 1295 is emphasised.
Keywords: Differential Settlement, Displacement, Flexible joints, Soil sub grade reaction, Rocker pipes.
1. INTRODUCTION
Both rigid and flexible pipelines are vulnerable to
ground movements as a consequence of the
significant levels of stress induced in them. Any
form of unanticipated differential ground
movements between a structure on a yielding
foundation and a pipeline attached to it, can further
exacerbate the stresses in the pipeline to
unacceptable levels. Often such differential
settlements that occur are either ignored or not
allowed for in the design and the pipeline fails,
subsequent to construction and even before it being
fully commissioned.
Nominal
diameter
mm
150
<600-150
675
<750-675
>750
Effective
length
mm
600
600
1000
1000
1250
Length to
Diameter
Ratio
4.0
1.0
1.5
1.3
1.7
150 mm
Maximum
600 mm
150 mm
Maximum
600 mm
Flexible Joint
Rocker Pipe
Rocker Pipe
(4)
Structure
X=
Soil Sub grade
Reaction
Soil Foundation
Y
Fig. 2. Semi-infinite beam on elastic foundation
X=
A
Y
Soil Foundation
foundation
. .. .. (6)
+ e x [ C (sin x cos x) + D (cos x + sin x)]
.(1)
For the particular problem illustrated in figure 1, the
following boundary conditions apply; Reginold
(2006) [5]
. .. .. (7)
y '' = 2 2 e x ( A sin x B cos x) + 2 2 e x
(C sin x + D cos x)
. .. .. (8)
y ''' = 2 3 e x [ A(cos x sin x) + B (sin x + cos x)]
. .. ..
(9)
. (2)
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0
Length of Pipe
10
"mm"
20
30
40
50
Longitudinal Bending
moment "Nmm"
-8.E-03
-3.E-03 0
3.E-03
8.E-03
1.E-02
2.E-02
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Flexible Joint
Rocker pipe
with Flexible Joint
CROSS SECTION
THROUGH PUMPHOUSE
3 GRP intake pipelines on
compressible
marine foundation
36.28m
L o ng itudina l B ending
M o m ent "kN .m "
-2.E-03
Position of
Fracture
-1.E-03
200
400
600
800
1000
0.E+00
1.E-03
2.E-03
3.E-03
4.E-03
1.4
MCRITICAL / MFAILURE
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
/D
Vertical
displacement"mm"
-2
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
2
4
6
8
10
12
Intermediate length
of the pipeline
Flexible pipeline
joint
Original Position
of the Pipeline
Differential
Settlement
Rocker Pipe
Transition Zone
Unsettled
ground profile
Flexible Joint
4. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
In view of the dearth of information from the
reviewed papers that deal with the soil interaction
with buried rigid/flexible conduits subjected to a
vertical movement/settlement, a laboratory research
program was performed.
Inspection
Chamber
Rocker Pipe
Flexible Joint
View: A
View: B
45
40
35
Predicted Value
100% Perfect
Match
2
2
30
25
20
1500mm
11
h=0mm
15
Fully 10
Restrained End
10
3
3
0
4-11 0 4-11
CH4-FF-Analy-40mm
5
10
15
20
h=0mm
Settlement End
h=0mm
SB-FL1-h0 -J2-Y1-40mm
2
1
3 Imposed
Section
25
30
35
40
45
Observed Value
5. CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions can be drawn from the
study
Fig.16. Detailed Instrumentation along the length of the
pipe
Established
pipeline
design
procedures
frequently ignore or underestimate the
settlements of soil masses, pipelines and
structures.
Analysis of pipelines as strip foundations can
provide a useful estimate of likely settlements.
Pipeline design should include analysis of
settlements, and the provision of measures to
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I am highly obliged and owe a great debt of
gratitude to my supervisor Professor D.C.
Wijeyesekera. Jonathan Olliff of Montgomery
Watson, with their expertise in buried pipeline
design. Ralph Potter for allowing me to use the
Pipeline Technology laboratory. I wish to especially
thank my father for sharing his worldly expertise in
the field of civil engineering.
REFERENCES
1. Civil Engineering Specification for the
Water Industry, 5th Edition, 2003.
11. Wijeyesekera
D.C.,Reginold J.T.,(2006)
Study of the use of rocker pipes to allow for
differential ground movement in pipelines.
Plastic Pipes conference- xiii, Washington
DC, USA.
12. Wijeyesekera
D.C.,Reginold
J.T.,(2007)
Mathematical and Physical study of pipelines
subjected to differential settlement. Advances in
computing
and
technology
Conference
Proceeding AC&T2007, London, United
Kingdom.