0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
37 vizualizări3 pagini
The document argues that NASA's $18 billion funding request for a manned mission to Mars should be denied. It contends that previous NASA expeditions have not been successful given the large amounts of money spent. The funding would be better spent addressing climate change and preserving Earth, according to warnings from scientists about the threats of human extinction. Approving the funding could also negatively impact the US economy by increasing the national debt and risking a bailout similar to Greece's. The document concludes that focusing on studying Earth is more practical than exploring space.
The document argues that NASA's $18 billion funding request for a manned mission to Mars should be denied. It contends that previous NASA expeditions have not been successful given the large amounts of money spent. The funding would be better spent addressing climate change and preserving Earth, according to warnings from scientists about the threats of human extinction. Approving the funding could also negatively impact the US economy by increasing the national debt and risking a bailout similar to Greece's. The document concludes that focusing on studying Earth is more practical than exploring space.
The document argues that NASA's $18 billion funding request for a manned mission to Mars should be denied. It contends that previous NASA expeditions have not been successful given the large amounts of money spent. The funding would be better spent addressing climate change and preserving Earth, according to warnings from scientists about the threats of human extinction. Approving the funding could also negatively impact the US economy by increasing the national debt and risking a bailout similar to Greece's. The document concludes that focusing on studying Earth is more practical than exploring space.
Recently, the National Aeronautics Space Administration began addressing issues of funding towards the US Government for the exploration of Mars. According to an article from CNN, NASA wants approximately 18 billion dollars to pursue a human-manned mission to mars, but should the US government approve of such funds. But, to show how unreasonable this plan is to look at the following 3 contentions.: First, we will begin by exploring previous space expeditions from NASA and their successfullness. Second, we will rocket our way into what the money could better be spent with. And land our way onto why this is ultimately a sour deal for the US Government, and the negative effects that will occur. I believe that the future is only the past again, entered through another gate. Previous expeditions of NASA have been deemed unsuccessful, as billions of dollars are spent each year, only to be wasted on how many moons Pluto has, or what gases make up Neptune, and a future in NASA expeditions will be no different. While these expeditions are somewhat benefiticial, it does not outweigh the cost out of the United States treasury.
Science is important, sure, but based on the lack of
importance in recent NASA expeditions should have you believing that this money could be better spent somewhere else. Which brings me to my next point, This 18 Billion Dollars could be better spent on other things. According to an article from NASA itself, 2015 has been the hottest year on record with 9/10 years since 2000 being the hottest years in history. Whether than spend money on exploring space, why dont we focus on the problems at hand on Earth. We can emphasis this claim from esteemed global scientist, and winner of the nobel prize for science, Frank Fenner who predicts that humans will be extinct within 100 years, if climate change is not addressed. So rather than worry about ditching the Earth for good, why not focus on preserving our Earth and the human race. And to finally settle down, let us discuss the negative impacts imposing such plan would result in. For 1, The United States Gov. is already trillions of dollars in debt, and doesnt have the money to afford such high expenses. This would only ruin US economy more, by putting the US in more national debt, and more inflation, which would then result in a international bailout like Greece.
So, first we began by looking at why this program
would lead to no important scientific studies, and then we studied what this money could be better spend on, with finally talking about the negative effects that would occur from passing such plan. Little minds are interested in the extraordinary; great minds in the commonplace. So while universal exploration is good, we can see that only the true great minds know that studying the Earth we currently live on, would be more important than the speck of light we see from the night sky.
The Practical Values of Space Exploration
Report of the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S.
House of Representatives, Eighty-Sixth Congress, Second
Session