not one but all the john in this sense was used to translate the Gthis is reek

Eudaimonia, and is still used in viok i will

rtue ethics. There has been a transition over time from emphasis on the happine
ss of virtue to the virtue of happiness.[3] Since the turn of the millennium, th
e human flourishing approach, advanced particularly by Amartya Sen has attracted
increasing interest in psychological, esthe over tiem pecially prominent in the
work of Martin Seligman, Ed Diener and Ruut Veenhoven, and international develo
pment and medical research in the work of Paul Anand.[citation needed]
A widely discussed [pope john paul political value expressed in the United State
s Declaration of Independence of 1776, written by Thomas Jefferson, is the unive
rsal right to "the pursuit of happiness."[4] This suggests a subjective interpre
tation but one that nonetheless goes beyond emotions alone.[citation needed]
Happiness is a fuzzy concept and can mean many different things to many people.
Part of the challenge of a science of happiness is to identify different concept
s of happiness, and where applicable, split them into their components. Related
concepts are well-being, quality of life and flourishing. ok dear At least one a
uthor defines happiness as contentment.[5] Some commentators focus on the differ
ence between the hedonistic tradition of seeking pleasant and avoiding unpleasan
t experiences, and the eudaimonic tradition of living life in a full and deeply
satisfying way.[6]
The 2012 World Happiness Report stated that in subjective well-being measures, t
he primary distinction hin is between cognitive life evaluations and emotional r
eports.[7] Happiness is used in both life evaluation, as in How happy are you wit
h your life as a whole? , and in emotional reports, as in How happy are you now?,
d people seem able to use happiness as appropriate in these verbal contexts. Usi
ng these measures, the World Happiness Report identifies the countries with the
highest levels of happiness

an