Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
For low volume rural roads (As per IRC :SP -72-2007)
i) Number of
harvesting
season=
3nos
Harvesting
Season -I
(Boro)
Harvesting
Season -2
( Aus & Jute
)
iii) Project
completion
time=
365 Days
Aug
July
June
May
April
March
Jan
Feb
2years
MOTOR CYCLES
AND SCOOTERS
1997
2699
3369
49
1885
999
1350
1685
25
943
ADT / Average
1498
2025
2527
37
1414
Total PCU
720
1945
1214
108
4074
trucks
CARS,JEEPS,VANS,
MATADOR,
THREE WHEELERS
ETC.
Description
Agricultural
Tractor Trailors & Mini
Trucks
Cycle
Commercial vehicles
MCV
HCV
Laden
Condition
Unladen
Condition
Overloading
by 20%
10.2
0.31
2.58
7.2
12.24
3.6
0.65
5.35
VDF
.
1.5
0.019
0.31
VDF
VDF
Note -III:- a)
8061
14436
As per Clause -7.2/ Table -10, IRC-73/1980, 3.80m wide carriage way suitable for total PCU upto 2500,
5.50 m wide carriage way suitable for total PCU 2500 to 5000,
7.0 m wide carriage way suitable for total PCU 5000-10000
Assuming :i) Uniform traffic growth rate , r=
6%
ii) Design life period
(n)
10
year
Cumulative Equivalent Standard Axel Load (ESAL ) application over design life :(Cl:- 3.4.4 of IRC :SP -72/2007)
2998
33951439
AADT on project is 14406 which is considerably high. So requirement of correction for solid wheel charts (SWC) is not relevant
as described in clause -3.4.6 of IRC : SP -72/2007
As ESAL = 33951439 is greater than 10,00,000 ESAL application, pavement design should be carried out as per IRC : 37 -2001
SP : 72-2007
Assistant Engineer
Basirhat Highway Sub-Divn
P.W.(Roads) Direct.
Nov
Sep
Oct
Dec
Vehicles
increases in
Harvesting
Season
Harvesting
Season -3
(Aman &
Veg)
Buses
al vehicles
HCV
0
0
0
0
10.2
5
2.58
6
3
0.31
12.24
6
5.35
is not relevant
From
To
12.11.2013
Road clasification
04.12.2013
(Date)
(Date)
ADT
/ Peak Season
From
District :To
Fast Vehicle
CARS,JEEPS,VANS,MATADOR,
THREE WHEELERS ETC.
Buses
Trucks
MOTOR CYCLES
AND SCOOTERS
Total
Col 5 to 8
ANIMAL DRAWN
VEHICLES
CYCLES
Date
Hour
Date
Hour
10
11
12.11.13
06 a.m.
13.11.13
06 a.m.
3080
1854
3395
8329
1728
13.11.13
06 a.m.
14.11.13
06 a.m.
2796
1894
3468
8158
2085
14.11.13
06 a.m.
15.11.13
06 a.m.
2599
1856
3385
7840
1992
15.11.13
06 a.m.
16.11.13
06 a.m.
2733
1945
3476
8153
2011
16.11.13
06 a.m.
17.11.13
06 a.m.
2770
1886
3259
7915
2089
17.11.13
06 a.m.
18.11.13
06 a.m.
2397
1887
3211
7495
1992
18.11.13
06 a.m.
19.11.13
06 a.m.
2516
1874
3392
7782
2082
Average
2699
1885
3369
7953
1997
1350
943
1685
3977
999
AADT / * Note - 1
1683
1175
Total average motorised & non motorized vehicles per day as counted
4957
12466
2427
5728
1245
1439
2100
1945
1358
= (1945+0+1358+2427+5728+0+1439+36+1473)
PCU Equivalency
(Table 9, IRC-73 / 1980)
Total PCU
0.5
1945
4074
1214
NOTE - 1:
Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) as counted, e.g. for full sized Trucks
=[{943 Nos.X365 Days+3-harvesting seasonsx( 1885-943 ) nos.x(0.4x2.5months x30days )} / 365 days] Nos.=1175nos.
NOTE - 2:
Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) on project completion, e.g. for full sized Trucks
=[{1175 Nos. X (1+0.05) power (2-years) = 1358 nos.
NOTE - 3:
The local information transpires that after improvement of the road bus service will be provided along the road
0.5
720
Assistant Engineer
Basirhat Highway Sub-Division
P.W.(Rds)Dett.
14406
P.W.(Rds)Dett.
Road clasification
West Bengal
Slow Vehicle
Remarks
Others
( Agricultural Tractor
Trailors & Mini
Trucks)
Total
Col 10 to 12
12
13
56
1784
54
2139
36
2029
47
2058
51
2140
43
2035
54
2136
49
2046
25
1023
14
31
1275
36
1473
3
108
A)
Design Data :
i)
ii)
iii)
:
:
2015
: A = P (1 + r) x
=
1206
x (1 + 0.05) power -2
1330
: 5.0%
v)
12.5 years
vi)
3.50
NH / SH
15 Year
Other Road
10 Year
vii)
B)
Design Calculation :
ii)
iv)
0 -- 150
1.5
150 -- 1500
3.5
4.5
0.50
iii)
Total pavement thickness for CBR = 3.16 % and Design Traffic =
15 msa
(Intrapolated from Plate-1, Page- 26 of IRC : 37,2012)
Proposed pavement composition
365X[(1+0.05)10-1]x 1330
xVDFx1.0x(1/0.05)x10-6msa
14.28
760
msa
mm
Provide:-
Widenning
Plain/Rolling
3.16
i)
(Table :4.2,
Page-8 of
IRC:37,2012)
Say,
15.00
Strengthening
Assistant Engineer
Basirhat Highway Sub-Division
P.W.(Rds)Dett.
1) 40mm thick BC
2) 75mm thick DBM & 50mm thick DBM
:
3)300mm thick WMM
Total Thickness = 765 mm
n both diren.)
e per day.
L.D.F.(F)
1.00
0.50
0.40
0.75 / 0.60
/ 0.45
10-6
msa
DBM
45 kg/ cm2
3.16
2.8 kg/ cm3
20 years
8 kg/ cm3
Tyre pressure , =
8 kg / cm2
0.075
500 cm
Width of slab B =
350 cm
Pavement Thickness h =
36 cm
The Axle load spectrum obtained from axle load survey of rear axle is given below:Sigle Axle loads
Axle load
class, MT
%age of axle
loads
19-21
34-38
17-19
2.15
30-34
15-17
2.69
26-30
13-15
5.91
22-26
11-13
6.45
18-22
9-11
11.29
14-18
less than 9
71.51
less than 14
Total
100.00
Total
%age of axle
loads
0.00
Page 13 of 33
1330
%age of axle
loads
%age of axle
loads
20
36
18
22598927
32
16
28274936
28
14
62120771
24
12
67796781
20
10
118670644
16
<10
751650819
<16
Total
1051112878
Total
Page 14 of 33
cvpd
= 10511128.78
nos
10511128.78
nos
(1/0.075)
Stress Kg/
Cm2 from
Chart
Stress ration
Expected
repeatition,
n
7= 5 / 6
20
24
18
0.45
62790000
0.00
18
21.6
17.5
0.44
22598927
Unlilited
16
19.2
15
0.38
28274936
#VALUE!
14
16.8
13.5
0.34
62120771
#VALUE!
12
14.4
12
0.3
67796781
#VALUE!
10
12
10
0.25
118670644
#VALUE!
751650819
#VALUE!
Sigle Axle
<10
Tandem Axle
36
43.2
15
0.380
#VALUE!
32
38.4
14
0.350
#VALUE!
28
33.6
12.5
0.310
#VALUE!
24
28.8
11
0.280
#VALUE!
20
24
0.230
#VALUE!
16
19.2
0.200
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
<16
The Cummulative fatigue life consumed being less than 1, Design life is safe from fatigue
consideration.
Check for Temparature stresses :Edge warping stress =
C x Ex a x t/ 2=
12.50
Where,
C= Bradbury co-efficient (Fig-2, Page- 21, IRC-58-2002)=
l= radius of relative stiffness, cm=
0.496
L / l=
4.2
B/l=
2.94
Total stress warping plus axle load stress=
Page 15 of 33
30.500
45 kg/ cm2
3.16
Poisson Ration, m =
0.15
8 kg/ cm3
Tyre pressure , =
8 kg / cm2
0.075
500 cm
Width of slab B =
350 cm
Pavement Thickness h =
36 cm
The Axle load spectrum obtained from axle load survey of rear axle is given below:Sigle Axle loads
Axle load
class, MT
%age of axle
loads
19-21
34-38
17-19
2.15
30-34
15-17
2.69
26-30
13-15
5.91
22-26
11-13
6.45
18-22
9-11
11.29
14-18
less than 9
71.51
less than 14
Total
100.00
Total
%age of axle
loads
0.00
Page 16 of 33
100.00
1330
cvpd
%age of axle
loads
%age of axle
loads
20
36
18
11299463
32
16
14137468
28
14
31060386
24
12
33898390
20
10
59335322
16
<10
375825410
<16
Total
525556439
Total
Page 17 of 33
5255564.39
nos
nos
(1/0.075)
Stress Kg/
Cm2 from
Chart
Stress ration
Expected
repeatition,
n
7= 5 / 6
20
24
18
0.45
62790000
0.00
18
21.6
17.5
0.44
11299463
Unlilited
16
19.2
15
0.38
14137468
#VALUE!
14
16.8
13.5
0.34
31060386
#VALUE!
12
14.4
12
0.3
33898390
#VALUE!
10
12
10
0.25
59335322
#VALUE!
375825410
#VALUE!
Sigle Axle
<10
Tandem Axle
36
43.2
15
0.380
#VALUE!
32
38.4
14
0.350
#VALUE!
28
33.6
12.5
0.310
#VALUE!
24
28.8
11
0.280
#VALUE!
20
24
0.230
#VALUE!
16
19.2
0.200
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
<16
0.00
The Cummulative fatigue life consumed being less than 1, Design life is safe from fatigue
consideration.
Check for Temparature stresses :Edge warping stress =
C x Ex a x t/ 2=
12.50
Where,
C= Bradbury co-efficient (Fig-2, Page- 21, IRC-58-2002)=
l= radius of relative stiffness, cm=
0.496
L / l=
4.2
B/l=
2.94
Total stress warping plus axle load stress=
Page 18 of 33
30.500
40 kg/ cm2
3.16
2.8 kg/ cm3
20 years
8 kg/ cm3
Tyre pressure , =
8 kg / cm2
0.075
500 cm
Width of slab B =
350 cm
Pavement Thickness h =
36 cm
10000 kg
The Axle load spectrum obtained from axle load survey of rear axle is given below:Sigle Axle loads (consist of
four wheel)
Axle load
class, MT
%age of axle
loads
%age of axle
loads
19-21
11.4
34-38
9.8
17-19
7.5
30-34
7.2
15-17
11.2
26-30
4.6
13-15
8.9
22-26
11.9
11-13
6.4
18-22
10.2
9-11
1.2
14-18
5.5
less than 9
0.9
less than 14
3.3
Page 19 of 33
47.50
Total
52.50
Page 20 of 33
100.00
1330
cvpd
%age of axle
loads
%age of axle
loads
20
59913430
36
51504527
18
39416730
32
37840061
16
58862317
28
24175594
14
46774520
24
62541212
12
33635610
20
53606753
10
6306677
16
28905602
<10
4730008
<16
17343361
Total
249639292
Total
275917110
Page 21 of 33
5255564
(1/0.075) msa
nos
nos
Stress Kg/
Cm2 from
Chart
Stress ration
7= 5 / 6
20
24
18
0.45
59913430
62790000
0.95
18
21.6
17.5
0.44
39416730
Unlilited
16
19.2
15
0.38
58862317
#VALUE!
14
16.8
13.5
0.34
46774520
#VALUE!
12
14.4
12
0.3
33635610
#VALUE!
10
12
10
0.25
6306677
#VALUE!
4730008
#VALUE!
Expected
Fatigue Life, Fatigue life
repeatition, n
N
Consumed
Sigle Axle
<10
Tandem Axle
36
43.2
15
0.380
51504527
#VALUE!
32
38.4
14
0.350
37840061
#VALUE!
28
33.6
12.5
0.310
24175594
#VALUE!
24
28.8
11
0.280
62541212
#VALUE!
20
24
0.230
53606753
#VALUE!
16
19.2
0.200
28905602
#VALUE!
17343361
#VALUE!
<16
0.95
The Cummulative fatigue life consumed being less than 1, Design life is safe from fatigue
consideration.
Check for Temparature stresses :Edge warping stress =
C x Ex al x t/ 2=
12.50
Where,
C= Bradbury co-efficient (Fig-2, Page- 21, IRC-58-2002)=
l= radius of relative stiffness, cm=
0.496
L / l=
4.2
B/l=
2.94
Total stress warping plus axle load stress=
Page 22 of 33
30.500
28.67
cm
10000
31
9.66
kg / cm2
< 40 kg / cm2
hence safe
Stress calculation sample:- (Appendix- 6, IRC- 58-2002, Page- 67) Westergaard Equation:a/h=
0.7963888889
<1.724
(1.6 a^2+h^2)^0.5-0.675 x h=
26.8
3.2
(Assumed)
40
30
15
50
cm
Nos of dowel bars participating in load trasfer for a distance of radius of relative stiffness=
=1 + 119 / 30cm =
nos
load Px 40% = =Pt x ( 1 +(119- 30 ) /119+(119- 30x2 ) /119+(119- 30x3 ) /119+(119- 30x4 ) /119)
=Pt x
Load carried by
dowel bar, Pt=
2.48
1612.9
5.14
41500
kdx ds x / 4 E I=
cm4
kg/ cm2
0.24
(Pt x kd x ( 2 + Bi x z) } /( 4 x Bi^3 x E x I)
292.03 which is less than 292 kg / cm2, hence OK
Page 23 of 33
40 kg/ cm2
3.16
2.8 kg/ cm3
20 years
8 kg / cm2
0.075
500 cm
Width of slab B =
350 cm
Pavement Thickness h =
40 cm
10000 kg
The Axle load spectrum obtained from axle load survey of rear axle is given below:Sigle Axle loads (consist of
four wheel)
Axle load
class, MT
%age of axle
loads
%age of axle
loads
19-21
34-38
17-19
4.7
30-34
15-17
5.88
26-30
13-15
12.94
22-26
11-13
14.12
18-22
9-11
20
14-18
less than 9
42.36
less than 14
0
Page 24 of 33
100.00
Total
0.00
Page 25 of 33
100.00
1857
cvpd
%age of axle
loads
%age of axle
loads
20
36
18
34488750
32
16
43147628
28
14
94954134
24
12
103613012
20
10
146760640
16
<10
310839036
<16
Total
733803200
Total
Page 26 of 33
7338032
(1/0.075) msa
nos
nos
Stress Kg/
Cm2 from
Chart
Stress ration
7= 5 / 6
20
24
15.45
0.39
unlimited
0.00
18
21.6
13.908
0.35
34488750
Unlilited
16
19.2
12.468
0.31
43147628
#VALUE!
14
16.8
10.812
0.27
94954134
#VALUE!
12
14.4
9.276
0.23
103613012
#VALUE!
10
12
7.968
0.2
146760640
#VALUE!
310839036
#VALUE!
Expected
Fatigue Life, Fatigue life
repeatition, n
N
Consumed
Sigle Axle
<10
Tandem Axle
36
43.2
13.908
0.350
#VALUE!
32
38.4
12.36
0.310
#VALUE!
28
33.6
10.812
0.270
#VALUE!
24
28.8
9.276
0.230
#VALUE!
20
24
7.728
0.190
#VALUE!
16
19.2
6.18
0.150
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
<16
0.00
The Cummulative fatigue life consumed being less than 1, Design life is safe from fatigue
consideration.
Check for Temparature stresses :Edge warping stress =
C x Ex al x t/ 2=
12.50
Where,
C= Bradbury co-efficient (Fig-2, Page- 21, IRC-58-2002)=
l= radius of relative stiffness, cm=
0.496
L / l=
4.2
B/l=
2.94
Total stress warping plus axle load stress=
Page 27 of 33
27.950
28.67
cm
10000
31
7.82
kg / cm2
< 40 kg / cm2
hence safe
Stress calculation sample:- (Appendix- 6, IRC- 58-2002, Page- 67) Westergaard Equation:a/h=
0.71675
<1.724
(1.6 a^2+h^2)^0.5-0.675 x h=
26.99
3.2
(Assumed)
40
30
15
50
cm
Nos of dowel bars participating in load trasfer for a distance of radius of relative stiffness=
=1 + 119 / 30cm =
nos
load Px 40% = =Pt x ( 1 +(119- 30 ) /119+(119- 30x2 ) /119+(119- 30x3 ) /119+(119- 30x4 ) /119)
=Pt x
Load carried by
dowel bar, Pt=
2.48
1612.9
5.14
41500
kdx ds x / 4 E I=
(Pt x kd x ( 2 + Bi x z) } /( 4 x Bi^3 x E x I)
Page 28 of 33
cm4
kg/ cm2
0.24
Page 29 of 33
Pavement Design
Design Data :
Present Year :
i)
ii)
iii)
:
:
2015
: A = P (1 + r) x
=
1206
x (1 + 0.075) power -2
1394
iv)
: 7.5%
v)
vi)
10
3.50
vii)
: 3.159
B)
Design Calculation :
0.40
ii)
=
Total pavement thickness for CBR = 3.159 % and Design Traffic
= 10.1 msa
(Intrapolated from Plate-2, Page-30 & 31 of IRC :
37,2001)
iv)
0 -- 150
150 -- 1500
More than
1500
iii)
Com.Vehicle
Per Day
i)
years
(Table :1 of
IRC:37,2001)
A)
365X[(1+0.075)10-1]x 1394
xVDFx0.40x(1/0.075)x10-6msa
10.08
msa
Say,
755 mm
:
Total pavement thickness provide 765 mm
Widenning
Strengthening
: 1) 40mm thick BC
2)125 mm thick DBM
2) 300mm thick WMM
Assistant Engineer
Basirhat Highway Sub-Division
P.W.(Rds)Dett.
2013
.075) power -2
Plain/Rolli
ng
Hilly
1.5
0.5
3.5
1.5
4.5
2.5
pe of road lane
L.D.F.
(F)
Single-lane
1.00
0.75
0.40
1.5/1.2
/0.90
Duel C/W
F x (1/r) x 10-6
0-1]x 1394
075)x10-6msa
10.10
s provide 765 mm
metal
msa