Captain Jacks Game Dynamics

Captain Jacks Game Dynamics!

A Quick Start Guide to Understanding the Dynamics
http://www.getabeautifulgirlfriend.com/shop/game-dynamics-mastery/

Page 1 of 12

Captain Jacks Game Dynamics

How to Get Women More Attracted to You

Since Im going out to meet and seduce women more and actually working on Sticking Points
Ive done a bit more experimentation and then, OUTSIDE THE FIELD, analysis of what Ive
noticed versus what I expected versus what I want.
I noticed the other day I was only marginally interesting to the hot bartenders and wait staff until
I started talking to cougar and the milf.
Normally, I explain this as Social Proof. Its one of the communities favorite theories. And, it
seems to explain a lot. Cialdini popularized it and the definition is people will be more likely to do
what they see other people doing.
What about in the case of a normal bootcamp when guys are opening but getting blown out or
failing to get attraction? They still get more Approach Invitations from women after opening that
when they dont open.
And, in this case youd expect them to get blown out so much the first few times that theyd be
done for the night due to all the negative social proof. But, that doesnt happen.
So, whats REALLY going on? Is it possible that other women seeing you talk to other women
and getting REJECTED could actually do more GOOD than harm?
Lets examine this a bit further
Have you ever looked at a woman and thought it looked hard to approach her and you werent
sure if you wanted to risk it. Then, some chode went and opened her and she was extremely
nice to him and everything went fine.
Then, you said to yourself, Holy shit, I could do better than that dork and you walked over and
started a conversation? Have you ever seen a hot girl with a dork and thought, Damn, how did
he get her? Im 10x cooler than that guy! and you if you had an easy chance youd have
attempted to flirt?
Both of the above have happened to me and others many, many times. Heres another related
question:
Did you know that guys have been blown out after approaching women, gone back in later, and
had it bust wide open?
What Im going to say is that Social Proof doesnt explain the warm responses you get from
approaching women when youve been seen in set OR you merge sets with pawns.
I think it has to do with how she categorizes YOU in relation to the Game being played.
Shes not keying off of the ACTUAL responses of the other women (thatd be pre-selection) as
much as shes keying off the realization that you are playing the Game.

Page 2 of 12

Captain Jacks Game Dynamics

See, women know that this is a Game. The Game is find an attractive mate to have sex with!
In any game there are Players and Spectators. If you are not talking to women, approaching
women or already with women then you are a Spectator until proven otherwise. (She may
HOPE that you are a Player and give you AIs to find out.)
Why do AIs increase when women see you open? Simply because they realize you are a Player
and so are they so, its an invitation from one Player to another Player to engage in the
Game.
What about opening sets with a woman with you? First, it demonstrates youre a Player in two
ways, the fact that you OPENED and you are already with a girl (another Player). Second, much
like you look at a dude and think you could do better than that guy, the girl looks at the girl and
thinks the same thing except girls seem to be much more aggressive in this area than the
average dude.
An HB3 WILL try to unseat an HB9 or 10 whereas most dudes who feel outclassed will shy
away and ask if she has any friends or something.
You are most likely missing a lot of Approach Invitations. Assume any eye contact is an AI for
the time being and youll get a lot of real world experience around the subject. Also, many afc/
PUAs have trouble with making or keeping eye contact so practice holding eye contact if you
havent done those types of drills. Especially if this is a weak point because it just wont be
tolerated in set. If this is a weak point for you literally stare girls down until you dont feel any
pressure to look away. A few days/nights of this is usually all you need.
You can make the assumption that if you see one AI youve probably missed 2 or 3.
Now, this snowballs. You open a set, girls notice, they start changing their body language and
giving you AIs. They look in your direction more. Other girls pick up on this you open more,
new girls pick up on it plus the old girls.
Snowball.
(If youve ever been in a club with a celebrity or sports star youll notice this on steroids
magnified by one hundred. You can hardly keep a womans attention when theres a big celeb in
proximity.)
As you move around girls will shift body language towards you. Youll get Proximity AIs from all
girl sets, etc.
Cant this be described by Pre-Selection?
Again, only partially. See, pre-selection means the women were visibly and intensely attracted
to you and the other women noticed it. We have PLENTY of examples of guys who have a lot of
hot female FRIENDS who couldnt get laid if their life depended on it. What is going on here?
Well, though they are surrounded by hot girls they never show new girls they meet that they are
in the game. They never show her that they know her Goals and move her across the barriers/
obstacles to the win.

Page 3 of 12

Captain Jacks Game Dynamics

Dont get me wrong Pre-Selection DOES help. But, what Im talking about is something even
before and more basic. Im talking about girls giving AIs and becoming warm just based on her/
their analysis that you are playing the same Game they are. Pre-selection comes later it is
Hes in the same Game AND hes obviously good at it. (Parading a woman around activates
Pre-Selected by Women, especially when multiple girls are paraded together or close together
in the same night.)
EVERYBODY in the game hates wasting time. Females dont want an opportunistic Spectator to
suck up their time so they usually reserve their AIs for proven Players. Girls also intuitively know
that if she can get one guy to open her then a few others will get more courage and open. Thus,
more Players and more opportunity for her to win.
What about Celebrities?
Why do women like Celebrities? Lets go through the standard list of reasons someone might
give.
1. Money? Money doesnt hurt BUT, it cant ONLY be money. Pro dating coaches have many,
many super rich guys come to us for help. Many super rich end up as sugar daddies for hotties
and those situations arent usually exclusive. 2. Looks? Well, women dont have the same
physiological responses to looks as men do. Their acceptable range of looks is MUCH wider
and is weak enough that we can totally ignore it. (Provided your grooming and style is good).
Plus, many Celebrities are dog ugly.
3. Status? A strong contributor. Society has conditioned us to treat celebs better. Even dudes
want to meet other celebrity dudes.
4. An Assumed Player in the Game. This conditioning of status begins the SNOWBALL we
talked about earlier. When you get the multiple girls visibly interested, the society conditioning of
treating celebs as special plus the idea of bragging rights and money, then you have a lot of
factors working together. It is deduced, assumed, that they are prime Players in the Game so
the females play all out.
The Case of the Man with Social Proof but Not a Player in the Game.
Take the example of a guy out with three women. One of them is his wife, the other two are her
sexy girlfriends. Does he get massive AIs? No. He might get a few at first. Some women are
screwy and like to try to get a married mans attention and others may not have noticed the ring
but after an hour or two in the venue he is essentially invisible to the other Players.
I noticed this when I was out with FBs/Girlfriends. Id get a LOT of AIs at first and after a bit I
was essentially invisible again. Sure I was with a hot girl (social proof idea) BUT it was preempted because the girls realized I wasnt in the Game.
So, I put the idea of Social Proof on the backburner as something that, while valid, only partially
described what was happening and opt instead for the fuller idea of Player in the Game. It better
describes what actually occurs in the field. Spectators, Players, Winners, Obstacles and Goals.

Page 4 of 12

Captain Jacks Game Dynamics

This also helps to mesh Sexual Framing with some of the more standard Mystery Method
structured approach theory. Though, I usually avoid the standard Peacocking, Pawning, Social
Proof/DHV routines (ex. the routine where you show you with pics with hot girls, doing cool shit,
hanging with cool people), with this idea they start to make sense together.
When I open and start Sexual Framing, Im demonstrating that Im a Player in the Game, that
we are both playing the same Game, that I value her Game Goal and Im willing to carry it home
(so to speak! haa).
Since Ive gotten good at opening one or two sets, hooking and staying in conversations for the
long haul, the other girls notice if the set busts or unravels. Many girls in the vicinity have
noticed the deep sexual attraction between me and the other girl and have me pegged as a
Player. Opening any girl who witnessed that makes it go that much easier.
She isnt looking for Value or Social Proof, shes looking for the man in her near vicinity who is
the best Player in the Game.
If you understand this it will lessen your worry about people seeing a set go bad. It wont matter,
by opening youll show everyone else youre in the game.
Captain Jack
P.S. You should also feel less pressure from others watching you open because Spectators
dont count! And, Male Players are too busy playing to notice or care! In fact, if anything theyre
probably thinking of allying with you to give both of you better chances to win.
The Game Dynamics Mastery Course provides a deep understanding of your interactions with
women. You'll know WHY things that were going well suddenly take a turn for the worst. The
Four Individual Game Dynamics provide THE KEY to getting incredibly good in a very short
period of time. It puts the fun, excitement and adventure back into playing Dating Games.

Page 5 of 12

Captain Jacks Game Dynamics

Become More Attractive to Women with Captain Jacks Game Dynamics
A comment from a reader on the previous Game Dynamics post:
Hmm I think this is boiling down to a bit of semantics and how you exactly define it. If I
go to a bar with my hot female friends I get tons more AIs that if I go with my male
buddies. Sure, if I dont do anything about it then the AIs will die down over time (except
for new girls entering the venue). But either way simply having hot girls with you gets
you more interest than not, therefore scientifically proving that social proof is a
contributory factor!
It wont get you laid (youll still have to open duh!) but is sure as dandy helps!
comment by charliereay on Opening and Social Proof Versus Player in the Game post
I am surprised I didnt get more of these types of comments. When I published the post I
expected to get a lot more of these types than the all out positive ones.
Let me start by saying this
Im not saying Social Proof isnt right or is wrong. What Im saying is that it is INCOMPLETE.
Im pointing out that it leaves A LOT more unexplained than explained.
I discussed quite a few things that it left unexplained in the last post. There is a higher level
dynamic at work when attracting, approaching and seducing women that better explains what is
going on and that is The Player in the Game concept of Game Dynamics.
One GREAT way to know if you have found a better organizing principle is if you experience a
surge in motivation to act or a desire to do things differently. Two or 3 commenters noted they
felt more pumped to approach women. The reason is because when they adopted this idea it
caused a spontaneous release of competing and inefficient ideas leaving more energy and
attention available for action. And/or it stabilized a lot of floating thoughts thus lessening
confusion (and confusion causes fear and apprehension.)
Ill show you how it better explains common field phenomena and then Ill show you how it
ALSO explainsSexual Framing.
Social Proof
Covered in previous post.

Peacocking
Someone who is peacocking (wearing outlandish clothes to draw attention) but not opening is a
tool. Why? Socially we know, and women know, that Peacocking is something you do when you
are Playing the Game. A dude who is Peacocked and not opening is socially weird. Likewise,
people with low game awareness call scantily clad women in the club sluts not realizing this is
what women do to invite the real Players to open. Saying that women open guys who are
peacocked because they realize the men are Players in the Game is a leap but it is a very small
leap in comparison to the prevailing theory.

Page 6 of 12

Captain Jacks Game Dynamics

It might be better explained by saying that women can use it to show everyone THEY are
playing the Game thus, getting her opened more without making it too obvious.

Pre-Selection
I covered this a bit in the last post. Pre-Selection is a VERY valid and observable phenom. But,
againthis only applies to Players in the Game. When they realize you arent in the Game their
awareness is no longer on you and all invitations and attention shift to find Players.

Jealousy Threads ( attempting to get a girl attracted to you to

make another girl jealous)
Again, you have to be a Player in the Game and have her attracted for a Jealousy Thread to
exist. J-Threads are incredibly powerful. They are so powerful BECAUSE the Game has a
limited time span (a Game Obstacle) and a limited number of Players (another Game Obstacle).
Her desire to win compels her to focus more energy on a proven quantity as does her desire to
IMPROVE against competition. (The competition is other females, not the males.) Add to that
the fact that she WAS on her way to Winning and youve got a deep sense of loss and selfdoubt creeping in. The idea that other females could be BETTER was theoretical, now it is all
too real. She will do ALMOST anything to beat the competitor.

Disqualifiers
There are two valid players. It looks like they are headed to winning but now one of them seems
to be questioning whether or not the other is a Player so the chances of winning drop causing
fear and increasing desire to get back in the Game.

DHVs (Demonstration of Higher Value showing that you are

a high value, desirable man)
Im skeptical about the real use of DHVs EXCEPT when you are talking to a girl to whom that
shit is important AND her logical mind is engaged. She can use that stuff to talk herself into
liking you or giving you more time/chances.
Ok, Player in the Game refines those a bit without colliding and give us a better understanding.
We KNOW Mystery Method works AND it works well for what it was designed to do. Those
items listed above are given as the reason MM works. But, what then explains the massive
success of Sexual Framing, which isnt built on any of those?
Sexual Framing doesnt use Jealousy-Threads, Pre-Selection, Demonstrations of Higher Value
(DHVs), Merging, Pawning or Social Proof except as a consequence when a set unravels and
you have to open a new one.
In fact, Sexual Framing VIOLATES many common MM principles.

Page 7 of 12

Captain Jacks Game Dynamics

Can the Player in the Game concept describe it? Yes! Wonderfully!
A Game is made up of Spectators, Players, Winners, Obstacles and Goals.
Im not using Obstacles in the MM definition here, which is, any person who is NOT your Target.
Although her friends COULD be Obstacles they arent by default. They are only Obstacles when
they dont KNOW that you and her friend have AGREED to play the game together. In Game
Dynamics an Obstacle is anything which could get in the way of achieving the Game Goal.
Approaching, attracting and seducing women is often called The Game.
So, I present to you The Game Dynamics.
All Games are Based on Agreement.
Game Dynamic 1: You and her must agree you are both Players. Naturally, this is you making a
smooth open, hooking the set and her entering communication with you. If you cant get
agreement on this you dont have a Game.
Game Dynamic 2: You and her must agree you are both playing the same Game TOGETHER.
By opening Sexual Frames you are telling her what Game you are playing. As she continues
talking with you and playing along she is AGREEING that this is a male-female conversation
with a sexual dynamic. If you cant get agreement on this you dont have a Game.
Game Dynamic 3: You must show her that you VALUE her Game Goal. By being nonjudgmental and telling her you LOVE how sexy she is, etc you are showing her this. If you cant
get agreement on this you dont have a Game.
Game Dynamic 4: You must demonstrate that you can carry her through the Obstacles. First,
by handling them in her mind, then in the immediate environment, then over time. This can be
done explicitly by getting the group to like you, getting her so into you that she handles the
group and any obstacles and/or using an Inoculation Routine like I mentioned in FR: College
Girls! Then, by baby-stepping her along ever so gently shell know/feel that she is having all the
good feelings and none of the bad (like she usually does), she gets even more comfortable and
puts more trust in you. If you cant get agreement on this you dont have a Game.
Also, you can look for her to show you the same! For example, when I ask her Youre not the
jealous type are you? and then tell a story about how I was hanging out (code for sexual
relationship) with a girl and she got jealous and I didnt approve, Im beginning to define what
Game we are playing and putting in question her agreement on Dynamic 2. She has to alleviate
my concerns by agreeing with me that jealousy sucks.
The Most Evil of All Evils
What about LMR (Last Minute Resistance to Sex)? Can this even shed some light on LMR?
Yes!

Page 8 of 12

Captain Jacks Game Dynamics

LMR is primarily an unclear agreement about whether or not you are both playing the same
Game (unclear Game Dynamic 2). It can also be that you havent shown her that you value her
Game Goal (unclear on Game Dynamic 3). (To read more about LMR and how to solve it click
the link.)
If she is playing Potential GF Game and you are playing ONE NIGHT STAND Game and she
THINKS you are playing Potential GF Game but isnt exactly sure due to mixed
communication signals then BAM! LMR!
Youd have to have told her that your game works like this Primarily Sexual and then possible
grow into GF over time in order to avoid it.
On the flipside, if you WERE playing to get a Girlfriend and she was CONVINCED you were and
she WAS playing that Game, too AND she believed that giving it up wouldnt destroy that
Game (clear on Game Dynamic 3), then shed have no issue having sex with you the first night.
This is why so many of the PUAs trained in social forms of Pickup have such a hard time
getting laid. They broadcast social, fun guy potential fun bf on Game Dynamic 2 and then
wonder why it takes forever to get to sex. Furthermore, they never make it clear that they
VALUE sexuality (Game Dynamic 3) so she has to be double certain it wont fuck up that Game
(GF GAME) before having sex. They have methodically built tons of agreement on a
DIFFERENT GAME (fun, cool, social BF/GF) and wonder why the Game Goal (sex) of a
DIFFERENT GAME isnt happening.
Those silly PUAS if only they knew about Captain Jacks Game Dynamics!
Captain Jack
P.S. Knowing what you know now about The Game Dynamics you should be able to pinpoint on
WHICH Dynamic any busted set failed on. All no-gos are failure on Game Dynamic 1. All sets
that unravel come from failures on Game Dynamic 4, etc. What would you do with said
information? Why youd examine your Game Plan and look for deficiencies in your common
routines/stacks/ideas/beliefs in that area, shore it up, set up experiments/solutions and get your
ass back in the Field!
P.P.S. Disqualifiers work because they threaten agreement on Game Dynamic 1. See that? If
there isnt agreement on all the Game Dynamics, there is NO GAME, thus no chance of
winning. Jealousy Thread threatens Game Dynamic 2.
The Game Dynamics Mastery Course provides a deep understanding of your interactions with
women. You'll know WHY things that were going well suddenly take a turn for the worst. The
Four Individual Game Dynamics provide THE KEY to getting incredibly good in a very short
period of time. It puts the fun, excitement and adventure back into playing Dating Games.

Page 9 of 12

Captain Jacks Game Dynamics

Make Dating Women Easy with Game Dynamics
Hola,
The Game Dynamics posts have really gotten around. Ive had DOUBLE the normal traffic and
linking as my normal stuff and a lot of guys are resonating with it.
Its gotten to the point where I look at all the words out of her mouth, text messages or emails as
attempts to Clarify on the Dynamics. I can HEAR which Dynamic is out of whack by the topics
she brings up and stuff she says or questions she asks. Now that I know what she is getting at I
can smoothly feed her the info she needs and ONLY the info she needs to get it Clarified.
Sexual Framing, while elegant in itself, did a lot of this but did it somewhat sloppily compared to
what I expect to create with this new model.
MOST of the success you see PUAs from other systems getting comes from a boost in
numbers/attempts, a boost in Intention+followup and the fact that women have high sex drives.
(Theres also the added effect of having something to say so they are less likely to fuck things
up.)
Now, shit is getting much, much easier.
It changes everything. It changes Sticking Point Analysis because now we look at SPs in terms
of which Dynamic you are not Clarifying or you are Violating. If you are doing it and notice a
pattern you can bust it and get a move forward BUT if you look at it form a higher viewpoint and
see which Dynamic you are messing up on then you can handle MULTITUDES of SPs and
potential SPs in one shot!
Progress will go through the roof!
By applying Game Dynamics, Ive already handled a BIG SP I have with girls that Im actually,
truly interested in cracked it wide open and dissolved it. Once I saw what it was it was easy,
easy, easy to dissolve. Using SP Analysis in the previous fine-grained approach wouldve taken
a LOT more time and effort and it wouldve reappeared down the road further in interactions.
Texting and Phone Game becomes so much easier. You probably have recent text messages in
your phone right now that are attempts by a girl to Clarify on Dynamic 2 (playing the same
game Together.) Handling it via text CAN be done but it wouldve been so much easier (and
more powerful and persuasive) to do it in person.
If you do too much texting/phone without setting things up and getting back in front of her then
you are creating DOUBT on Dynamic 4 You must demonstrate that you can carry her through
Obstacles first by handling them in her mind, then in the immediate environment, then over
time.)
Shit that was ON! can fizzle really quickly if you create DOUBT here. Also, if original
Agreement on Dynamic 2 was on an SNL type or no strings attached relationship then the
prolonged and repetitive association with her day-to-day life can start undermining the original
agreement as that begins to look like a diff. game!

Page 10 of 12

Captain Jacks Game Dynamics

Can you see this?

We now have a model and a methodical way to deduce WHERE our gaming attempts are going
wrong!!! And, then apply fixes in our communication to make things seem to her like it just
happened!
This WILL create a huge jump just like Sexual Framing has!!! I predict it will have much more far
reaching impact as we can begin to really get at the Game Rules. (Each type of Game has
different Rules. Ex: GF/BF Game has a Rule: You do not Date other Players.)
Game Rules are things that must be met or not violated in order for the Game to exist and
continue existing.
Time frames will shorten and close ratios will go WAY UP.
This is Gaming Elegance at its finest and there arent a bazillion steps to remember or keep
track of. Once you have conceptual understanding then a simple question (in your head) to
notice what she is attempting to Clarify and then your response to Clarify it makes shit run so
smooth it is ridiculous. (Lots of drills and examples given in the Game Dynamics Mastery
Course.)
In the future, Ill release even more audios on new techniques and ways to execute this stuff,
starting with a reclassification of all the standard stuff in the community. Using a tactic or
routine at the wrong time can really, really fuck things up! Once you have Clarified youll NEVER
use certain tactics/communications with her again because it will only make you go backwards.
This is why certain sets inexplicably unravel.
Anyway, guys this is an awesome new discovery. We ARE on to something that is going to
SIMPLIFY and FORWARD gaming for the future.
Hope to see you as a member of my group of PUAs going out and benefiting and really jumping
to the cutting edge.
Captain Jack

Page 11 of 12

Captain Jacks Game Dynamics

Next Steps
Thanks for reading this quick start guide to the Game Dynamics. What youve read are the
original three core posts that originally appeared on my blog and should give you a quick start to
understanding all the jargon that appears in the posts and in the course.
The next steps are:
1. Read the rest of the Game Dynamics Posts at: http://www.getabeautifulgirlfriend.com/
category/game-dynamics/
2. Take the Game Dynamics Mastery course! Guys reported smoother, easier and faster
interactions and that they IMPROVED their game so much faster because they finally
understood all the mystifying things that would happen (or not happen) in their dating life.
Cryptic statements by women suddenly became clear. They wouldnt waste time building
Agreement on the wrong things. They wouldnt unwittingly agree to the wrong Game and
more.
3. Apply it to your OWN Game and watch the results!

Captain Jack

Page 12 of 12