Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
savages are not nominated in the cablegram. Heretofore the Moros have used knives and clubs
mainly; also ineffectual trade-muskets when they had any.
The official report stated that the battle was fought with prodigious energy on both sides during a
day and a half, and that it ended with a complete victory for the American arms. The
completeness of the victory is established by this fact: that of the six hundred Moros not one was
left alive. The brilliancy of the victory is established by this other fact, to wit: that of our six
hundred heroes only fifteen lost their lives.
General Wood was present and looking on. His order had been, "Kill or capture those savages."
Apparently our little army considered that the "or" left them authorized to kill or capture
according to taste, and that their taste had remained what it has been for eight years, in our army
out therethe taste of Christian butchers.
The official report quite properly extolled and magnified the "heroism" and "gallantry" of our
troops; lamented the loss of the fifteen who perished, and elaborated the wounds of thirty-two of
our men who suffered injury, and even minutely and faithfully described the nature of the
wounds, in the interest of future historians of the United States. It mentioned that a private had
one of bis elbows scraped by a missile, and the private's name was mentioned. Another private
had the end of his nose scraped by a missile. His name was also mentionedby cable, at one
dollar and fifty cents a word.
Next day's news confirmed the previous day's report and named our fifteen killed and thirty-two
wounded again, and once more described the wounds and gilded them with the right adjectives.
Let us now consider two or three details of our military history. In one of the great battles of the
Civil War ten per cent of the forces engaged on the two sides were killed and wounded. At
Waterloo, where four hundred thousand men were present on the two sides, fifty thousand fell,
killed and wounded, in five hours, leaving three hundred and fifty thousand sound and all right
for further adventures. Eight years ago, when the pathetic comedy called the Cuban War was
played, we summoned two hundred and fifty thousand men. We fought a number of showy
battles, and when the war was over we had lost two hundred and sixty-eight men out of our two
hundred and fifty thousand, in killed and wounded in the field, and just fourteen times as many
by the gallantry of the army doctors in the hospitals and camps. We did not exterminate the
Spaniardsfar from it. In each engagement we left an average of two per cent of the enemy
killed or crippled on the field.
Contrast these things with the great statistics which have arrived from that Moro crater! There,
with six hundred engaged on each side, we lost fifteen men killed outright, and we had thirty-two
woundedcounting that nose and that elbow. The enemy numbered six hundredincluding
women and childrenand we abolished them utterly, leaving not even a baby alive to cry for its
dead mother. This is incomparably the greatest victory that was ever achieved by the Christian
soldiers of the United States.
Now then, how has it been received? The splendid news appeared with splendid display-heads in
every newspaper in this city of four million and thirteen thousand inhabitants, on Friday
morning. But there was not a single reference to it in the editorial columns of any one of those
newspapers. The news appeared again in all the evening papers of Friday, and again those papers
were editorially silent upon our vast achievement. Next days additional statistics and particulars
appeared in all the morning papers, and still without a line of editorial rejoicing or a mention of
the matter in any way. These additions appeared in the evening papers of that same day
(Saturday) and again without a word of comment. In the columns devoted to correspondence, in
the morning and evening papers of Friday and Saturday, nobody said a word about the "battle."
Ordinarily those columns are teeming with the passions of the citizen; he lets no incident go by,
whether it be large or small, without pouring out his praise or blame, his joy or his indignation
about the matter in the correspondence column. But, as I have said, during those two days he was
as silent as the editors themselves. So far as I can find out, there was only one person among our
eighty millions who allowed himself the privilege of a public remark on this great occasionthat
was the President of the United States. All day Friday he was as studiously silent as the rest. But
on Saturday he recognized that his duty required him to say something, and he took his pen and
performed that duty. If I know President Rooseveltand I am sure I dothis utterance cost him
more pain and shame than any other that ever issued from his pen or his mouth. I am far from
blaming him. If I had been in his place my official duty would have compelled me to say what he
said. It was a convention, an old tradition, and he had to be loyal to it. There was no help for it.
This is what he said:
Washington, March 10.
Wood, Manila:I congratulate you and the officers and men of your command upon the brilliant
feat of arms wherein you and they so well upheld the honor of the American flag.
(Signed) Theodore Roosevelt
His whole utterance is merely a convention. Not a word of what he said came out of his heart. He
knew perfectly well that to pen six hundred helpless and weaponless savages in a hole like rats in
a trap and massacre them in detail during a stretch of a day and a half, from a safe position on the
heights above, was no brilliant feat of armsand would not have been a brilliant feat of arms
even if Christian America, represented by its salaried soldiers, had shot them down with Bibles
and the Golden Rule instead of bullets. He knew perfectly well that our uniformed assassins had
not upheld the honor of the American flag, but had done as they have been doing continuously
for eight years in the Philippinesthat is to say, they had dishonored it.
The next day, Sunday,which was yesterdaythe cable brought us additional newsstill more
splendid newsstill more honor for the flag. The first display-head shouts this information at us
in the stentorian capitals: "women slain in moro slaughter."
"Slaughter" is a good word. Certainly there is not a better one in the Unabridged Dictionary for
this occasion. The next display line says:
"With Children They Mixed in Mob in Crater, and All Died Together."
They were mere naked savages, and yet there is a sort of pathos about it when that word children
falls under your eye, for it always brings before us our perfectest symbol of innocence and
helplessness; and by help of its deathless eloquence color, creed and nationality vanish away and
we see only that they are childrenmerely children. And if they are frightened and crying and in
trouble, our pity goes out to them by natural impulse. We see a picture. We see the small forms.
We see the terrified faces. We see the tears. We see the small hands clinging in supplication to the
mother; but we do not see those children that we are speaking about. We see in their places the
little creatures whom we know and love.
The next heading blazes with American and Christian glory like to the sun in the zenith:
"Death List is Now 900."
I was never so enthusiastically proud of the flag till now!
The next heading explains how safely our daring soldiers were located. It says:
Impossible to Tell Sexes Apart in Fierce Battle on Top of Mount Dajo.
The naked savages were so far away, down in the bottom of that trap, that our soldiers could not
tell the breasts of a woman from the rudimentary paps of a manso far away that they couldnt
tell a toddling little child from a black six-footer. This was by all odds the least dangerous battle
that Christian soldiers of any nationality were ever engaged in.
The next heading says:
Fighting for Four Days.
So our men were at it four days instead of a day and a half. It was a long and happy picnic with
nothing to do but sit in comfort and fire the Golden Rule into those people down there and
imagine letters to write home to the admiring families, and pile glory upon glory. Those savages
fighting for their liberties had the four days too, but it must have been a sorrowful time for them.
Every day they saw two hundred and twenty- five of their number slain, and this provided them
grief and mourning for the nightand doubtless without even the relief and consolation of
knowing that in the meantime they had slain four of their enemies and wounded some more on
the elbow and the nose.
The closing heading says:
Lieutenant Johnson Blown from Parapet by Exploding Artillery Gallantly Leading Charge.
Lieutenant Johnson has pervaded the cablegrams from the first. He and his wound have sparkled
around through them like the serpentine thread of fire that goes excursioning through the black
crisp fabric of a fragment of burnt paper. It reminds one of Gillettes comedy farce of a few years
ago, Too Much Johnson. Apparently Johnson was the only wounded man on our side whose
wound was worth anything as an advertisement. It has made a great deal more noise in the world
than has any similarly colossal event since Humpty Dumpty fell off the wall and got injured.
The official dispatches do not know which to admire most, Johnsons adorable wound or the nine
hundred murders. The ecstasies flowing from Army Headquarters on the other side of the globe
to the White House, at a dollar and a half a word, have set fire to similar ecstasies in the
Presidents breast. It appears that the immortally wounded was a Rough Rider under Lieutenant
Colonel Roosevelt at San Juan Hillthat extinguisher of Waterloowhen the Colonel of the
regiment, the present Major General Dr. Leonard Wood, went to the rear to bring up the pills and
missed the fight. The President has a warm place in his heart for anybody who was present at that
bloody Collision of military solar systems, and so he lost no time in cabling to the wounded hero,
How are you? And got a cable answer, Fine, thanks. This is historical. This will go down to
posterity.
Johnson was wounded in the shoulder with a Slug. The slug was in a shellfor the account says
the damage was caused by an exploding shell which blew Johnson off the rim. The people down
in the hole had no artillery; therefore it was our artillery that blew Johnson off the rim. And so it
is now a matter of historical record that the only officer of ours who acquired a wound of
advertising dimensions got it at our hands, not the enemys. It seems more than probable that if
we had placed our soldiers out of the way of our own weapons, we should have come out of the
most extraordinary battle in all history without a scratch.
The ominous paralysis continues. There has been a slight sprinklean exceedingly slight
sprinklein the correspondence columns, of angry rebukes of the President for calling this
cowardly massacre a brilliant feat of arms, and for praising our butchers for holding up the
honor of the flag in that singular way; but there is hardly a ghost of a whisper about the feat of
arms in the editorial columns of the papers.
I hope that this silence will continue. It is about as eloquent and as damaging and effective as the
most indignant words could be, I think. When a man is sleeping in a noise, his sleep goes
placidly on; but if the noise stops, the stillness wakes him. This silence has continued five days
now. Surely it must be waking the drowsy nation. Surely the nation must be wondering what it
means. A five-day silence following a world-astonishing event has not happened on this planet
since the daily newspaper was invented.
At a luncheon party of men convened yesterday to God-speed George Harvey, who is leaving today for a vacation in Europe, all the talk was about the brilliant feat of arms; and no one had
anything to say about it that either the President or Major General Dr. Wood, or the damaged
Johnson, would regard as complimentary, or as proper comment to put into our histories. Harvey
said he believed that the shock and shame of this episode would eat down deeper and deeper into
the hearts of the nation and fester there and produce results. He believed it would destroy the
Republican party and President Roosevelt. I cannot believe that the prediction will come true, for
the reason that prophecies which promise valuable things, desirable things, good things, worthy
things, never come true. Prophecies of this kind are like wars fought in a good causethey are
so rare that they dont count.
Day before yesterday the cable-note from the happy General Dr. Wood was still all glorious.
There was still proud mention and elaboration of what was called the desperate hand-to-hand
fight.Doctor Wood not seeming to suspect that he was giving himself away, as the phrase
goessince if there was any very desperate hand-to-hand fighting it would necessarily happen
that nine hundred hand-to-hand fighters, if really desperate, would surely be able to kill more
than fifteen of our men before their last man and woman and child perished.
Very well, there was a new note in the dispatches yesterday afternoonjust a faint suggestion
that Dr. Wood was getting ready to lower his tone and begin to apologize and explain. He
announces that he assumes full responsibility for the fight. It indicates that he is aware that there
is a lurking disposition here amidst all this silence to blame somebody. He says there was no
wanton destruction of women and children in the fight, though many of them were killed by
force of necessity because the Moros used them as shields in the hand-to-hand fighting.
This explanation is better than none; indeed it is considerably better than none. Yet if there was
so much hand-to-hand fighting there must have arrived a time, toward the end of the four days
butchery, when only one native was left alive. We had six hundred men present; we had lost only
fifteen; why did the six hundred kill that remaining manor woman, or child?
Dr. Wood will find that explaining things is not in his line. He will find that where a man has the
proper spirit in him and the proper force at his command, it is easier to massacre nine hundred
unarmed animals than it is to explain why he made it so remorselessly complete. Next he
furnishes us this sudden burst of unconscious humor, which shows that he ought to edit his
reports before he cables them:
Many of the Moros feigned death and butchered the American hospital men who were relieving
the wounded.
We have the curious spectacle of hospital men going around trying to relieve the wounded
savagesfor what reason? The savages were all massacred. The plain intention was to massacre
them all and leave none alive. Then where was the use in furnishing mere temporary relief to a
person who was presently to be exterminated? The dispatches call this battue a battle. In what
way was it a battle? It has no resemblance to a battle. In a battle there are always as many as five
wounded men to one killed outright. When this so-called battle was over, there were certainly not
fewer than two hundred wounded savages lying on the field. What became of them? Since not
one savage was left alive!
The inference seems plain. We cleaned up our four days work and made it complete by
butchering those helpless people.
The Presidents joy over the splendid achievement of his fragrant pet, General Wood, brings to
mind an earlier presidential ecstasy. When the news came, in 1901, that Colonel Funston had
penetrated to the refuge of the patriot, Aguinaldo, in the mountains, and had captured him by the
use of these arts, to wit: by forgery, by lies, by disguising his military marauders in the uniform
of the enemy, by pretending to be friends of Aguinaldos and by disarming suspicion by cordially
shaking hands with Aguinaldos officers and in that moment shooting them downwhen the
cablegram announcing this brilliant feat of arms reached the White House, the newspapers said
that that meekest and mildest and gentlest and least masculine of men, President McKinley,
could not control his joy and gratitude, but was obliged to express it in motions resembling a
dance. Also President McKinley expressed his admiration in another way. He instantly shot that
militia Colonel aloft over the heads of a hundred clean and honorable veteran officers of the
army and made him a Brigadier General in the regular service, and clothed him in the honorable
uniform of that rank, thus disgracing the uniform, the flag, the nation, and himself.
Wood was an army surgeon, during several years, out West among the Indian hostiles. Roosevelt
got acquainted with him and fell in love with him. When Roosevelt was offered the colonelcy of
a regiment in the iniquitous Cuban-Spanish war, he took the place of Lieutenant Colonel and
used his influence to get the higher place for Wood. After the war Wood became our Governor
General in Cuba and proceeded to make a mephitic record for himself. Under President
Roosevelt, this doctor has been pushed and crowded along higher and higher in the military
servicealways over the heads of a number of better menand at last when Roosevelt wanted
to make him a Major General in the regular army (with only five other Major Generals between
him and the supreme command) and knew, or believed, that the Senate would not confirm
Woods nomination to that great place, he accomplished Woods appointment by a very unworthy
device. He could appoint Wood himself, and make the appointment good, between sessions of
Congress. There was no such opportunity, but he invented one. A special session was closing at
noon. When the gavel fell extinguishing the special session, a regular session began instantly.
Roosevelt claimed that there was an interval there determinable as the twentieth of a second by a
stop-watch, and that during that interval no Congress was in session. By this subterfuge he
foisted this discredited doctor upon the army and the nation, and the Senate hadnt spirit enough
to repudiate it.
4. Women vs Men
Women vs. ... There are great differences between men and women, some of
which are cleanliness habits, thought processes, and child rearing. ... Another
area that men and women seem to butt heads is the issue of how to go about
doing the simplest of tasks. ... Women have the greatest burden. ... Men have to
be educators too. ...
Men And Women Being EqualMen and Women Whoever said men and women
are equal must be blind. Women have always taken a back seat to men in
American society. ... There was no mention of women being equal, only men. ...
The salary of men and women who do the exact same work differ. ... Another
example that men and women are not equal are&...
proves that he still thinks about women and their beauty, and is simply trying to
give men all&#...
9. Women
Men have been portrayed as the dominant gender since the beginning of time. ...
The states payed attention to the military and political contributions of men, which
strengthened their patriarchal society. ... Arab women liked having rights in
comparison to the women of other lands. ... Women were seen as individuals
equal to men. ... Although women&#...
Approx Pages: 5
This kind of movis cater to the taste of both men and women,but generally
speaking,men are stable,stronger while women a...
Approx Pages: 6
results. ... There is middle ground where men and women can meet and find
understanding. ... These findings seem to mirror the expectations and views of
men and women by society whereas men are more viewed to ...
Has Bibliography
43. h
Burrows' seventh grade English class, I wrote a paper entitled Women vs. Men in
the Work Force. ... For example, in 1998, "women received 63% of the pay men
received for the same job." ... Yet, even with these good-paying jobs, women's
average earnings have not reached those of men. 1997 Bureau of Labor
Statisti...
44. Women
How do women communicate and what differentiates their language/
communication from that of men?... Depending on the subject matter men as well
as women will convey themselves in different ways. ... Men and women use this
style of communication in a different way. ... What do men and women talk
about? When women talk with women a big part of their&#...
46. HRM
Burrows’ seventh grade English class, I wrote a paper entitled Women
vs. Men in the Work Force. ... Yet, even with these good-paying jobs,
women’s average earnings have not reached those of men. 1997 Bureau
of Labor Statistics has weekly wage data showing that women earned less than
men in 99% of all occupations&...
51. Women
Women are making themselves known in the work environment by showing men
they are just as hard working as them, but is it helping women get the same
opportunities as men? ... For example, Condoleezza Rice is the National Security
Adviser, and that is a big job, but many women do not have this fair chance
because some men will not allow...
Outside world were meant only for men, the bread-earners of a family. ... They
want status at par with men in every respect possible. ... Men. ... Men. ... That is
because whenever they are demanding something, they are actually giving men
a choice. ...
jobs, be the family bread winner, and serve in the armed forces if they so choose,
and while most women firmly support this parity, from time to time when a door is
...
69. Women
As, shown in the timeline , women didn't have the same rights as men and didn't
gain those rights until 1920. Furthermore, men thought of women as property and
they showed no respect for women. ... This meant that she fought for women's
rights and didn't only believe that women should be equal as men in voting,
but&...
74. Women
The only other option for respectable women of any class was to work as
governesses, schoolmistresses, clerks, shop assistants, or servants.It was in this
time when the organized women's suffrage movement begun: In 1866 a group of
women organized a petition that demanded that women should have the same
political rights as men. ... Mill added an&...
75. Women
Today, women in nearly all countries have the same voting rights as men. ... The
men and women who supported the drive for woman suffrage were called
suffragists. ... Only New Jersey gave women the vote, but in 1807, that state also
limited voting rights to men. ... The men and women at the convention adopted a
Declaration of Sentiments that...
76. Feminism
Feminism is the belief that women should have economic, political, and social
equality with men. ... At that time, many people regarded women as inferior and
less important than men. ... Amazon feminists tend to view that all women are as
physically capable as all men. Cultural feminism is the theory that there are
personality differences betw...
77. Women
Women were seen as passive and weak, and not as able to accomplish
physically or mentally all that men could. ... Women in America, Social Change
and The Legal System"It all started back in the revolutionary era which brought
women responsibility because men were away at war. ... But when the men
returned home, more often than not, women...
78. Women
Women were seen as passive and weak, and not as able to accomplish
physically or mentally all that men could. ... Women in America, Social Change
and The Legal System"It all started back in the revolutionary era which brought
women responsibility because men were away at war. ... But when the men
returned home, more often than not, women...
Over Walking at Night", "Do women feel more vulnerable than men, especially in
situations where they're alone at night?"... This shows how truly different men are
from women emo...
Men and Women are very different in many ways. Not only physically, but also
emotionally, and mentally. Because of these differences, there is also a
distinction in the way men or women are treated. When looking at the obvious
facts that set males apart from females, it is quite clear to me that men definitely
have the advantage. Not only do men have better builds than women, but men
also do not have to go through certain changes throughout their lives like females
do, such as menstruation. Also, men and women are treated very differently in
society. Men are, in most cases, treated better, whether it is in the workplace or
just out for leisure. Although there are some advantages to being a woman, such
as not having to sign up for the draft, overall, the advantage is on the guys side.
First of all, men were made with bigger, stronger, and seemingly better
bodies. The strongest man is, no doubt, stronger than the strongest woman, and
the majority of men are built better, or tougher than the majority of women. A
mans body can endure more than a womans, and in our society being stronger,
bigger, or tougher is a good thing and a goal for many people. Women are seen
as being weak and unable to do things for themselves.
Secondly, men do not undergo certain unpleasant events, or changes
throughout their lifetime that women have to endure. For example, having a
menstrual cycle, and dealing with your body constantly changing every month.
Not to mention once that is over with, dealing with menopause. Also, men cannot
give birth, which is one of the most painful experiences a woman will ever go
through. There are many different changes that happen to a womans body
during puberty that men dont have to go through. Thats not to say that men go
through things that women dont go through, but things such as menstruation is
something that will last beyond puberty. Overall, women go through more
changes in their bodies, and tho...
[ This paper is collection of research conclusions and observations which I have witnessed over
the past 5 year that I have attempted to put into a written form that might be helpful, but more
importantly stimulate discussions. The real purposes is to increase the awareness between men
and women, and to help them set aside issues that are not personal but are merely manifestations
of nature. To my way of thinking, it is important to honor and rejoice in both our nature and our
individuality.]
For centuries, the differences between men and women were socially defined and distorted
through a lens of sexism in which men assumed superiority over women and maintained it
through domination. As the goal of equality between men and women now grows closer we are
also losing our awareness of important differences. In some circles of society, politically correct
thinking is obliterating important discussion as well as our awareness of the similarities and
differences between men and women. The vision of equality between the sexes has narrowed the
possibilities for discovery of what truly exists within a man and within a woman. The world is
less interesting when everything is same.
It is my position that men and women are equal but different. When I say equal, I mean that men
and women have a right to equal opportunity and protection under the law. The fact that people
in this country are assured these rights does not negate my observation that men and women are
at least as different psychologically as they are physically.
None of us would argue the fact that men and women are physically different. The physical
differences are rather obvious and most of these can be seen and easily measured. Weight, shape,
size and anatomy are not political opinions but rather tangible and easily measured. The physical
differences between men and women provide functional advantages and have survival value.
Men usually have greater upper body strength, build muscle easily, have thicker skin, bruise less
easily and have a lower threshold of awareness of injuries to their extremities. Men are
essentially built for physical confrontation and the use of force. Their joints are well suited for
throwing objects. A mans skull is almost always thicker and stronger than a womens. The
stereotype that men are more "thick-headed" than women is not far fetched. A mans "thick
headedness", and other anatomical differences have been associated with a uniquely male
attraction to high speed activities and reckless behavior that usually involve collisions with other
males or automobiles. Men invented the game "chicken", not women. Men, and a number of
other male species of animal seem to charge and crash into each other a great deal in their spare
time.
Women on the other hand have four times as many brain cells (neurons) connecting the right and
left side of their brain. This latter finding provides physical evidence that supports the
observation that men rely easily and more heavily on their left brain to solve one problem one
step at a time. Women have more efficient access to both sides of their brain and therefore
greater use of their right brain. Women can focus on more than one problem at one time and
frequently prefer to solve problems through multiple activities at a time. Nearly every parent has
observed how young girls find the conversations of young boys "boring". Young boys express
confusion and would rather play sports than participate actively in a conversation between 5 girls
who are discussing as many as three subjects at once!
The psychological differences between man and women are less obvious. They can be difficult to
describe. Yet these differences can profoundly influence how we form and maintain relationships
that can range from work and friendships to marriage and parenting.
find some compromise or way to cope. Few people ever work past these difficulties. People tend
to accept what they dont understand when they feel powerless to change it.
Relationships between men and women are not impossible or necessarily difficult. Problems
simply arise when we expect or assume the opposite sex should think, feel or act the way we do.
Its not that men and women live in completely different realities. Rather, our lack of knowledge
and mutual experience gives rise to our difficulties.
Despite great strides in this country toward equality, modern society hasnt made relationships
between men and women any easier. Todays society has taught us and has imposed on us the
expectation that men and women should live together continuously, in communion, and in
harmony. These expectations are not only unrealistic but ultimately they leave people feeling
unloved, inadequate, cynical, apathetic or ashamed.
The challenge facing men and women is to become aware of their identities, to accept their
differences, and to live their lives fully and as skillfully as possible. To do this we must first
understand in what ways we are different. We must avoid trying to change others to suit our
needs. The following illustrates some important differences between men and women. These
differences are not absolute. They describe how men and women are in most situations most of
the time.
Problems
Men and women approach problems with similar goals but with different considerations. While
men and women can solve problems equally well, their approach and their process are often quit
different. For most women, sharing and discussing a problem presents an opportunity to explore,
deepen or strengthen the relationship with the person they are talking with. Woman are usually
more concerned about how problems are solved than merely solving the problem itself. For
women, solving a problem can profoundly impact whether they feel closer and less alone or
whether they feel distant and less connected. The process of solving a problem can strengthen or
weaken a relationship. Most men are less concerned and do not feel the same as women when
solving a problem.
Men approach problems in a very different manner than women. For most men, solving a
problem presents an opportunity to demonstrate their competence, their strength of resolve, and
their commitment to a relationship. How the problem is solved is not nearly as important as
solving it effectively and in the best possible manner. Men have a tendency to dominate and to
assume authority in a problem solving process. They set aside their feelings provided the
dominance hierarchy was agreed upon in advance and respected. They are often distracted and
do not attend well to the quality of the relationship while solving problems.
Some of the more important differences can be illustrated by observing groups of young teenage
boys and groups of young teenage girls when they attempt to find their way out of a maze. A
group of boys generally establish a hierarchy or chain of command with a leader who emerges on
his own or through demonstrations of ability and power. Boys explore the maze using scouts
while remaining in distant proximity to each other. Groups of girls tend to explore the maze
together as a group without establishing a clear or dominant leader. Relationships tends to be coequal. Girls tend to elicit discussion and employ "collective intelligence" to the task of
discovering a way out. Girls tend to work their way through the maze as a group. Boys tend to
search and explore using structured links and a chain of command.
Thinking
While men and women can reach similar conclusions and make similar decisions, the process
they use can be quit different and in some cases can lead to entirely different outcomes. In
general, men and women consider and process information differently.
Women tend to be intuitive global thinkers. They consider multiple sources of information within
a process that can be described as simultaneous, global in perspective and will view elements in
the task in terms of their interconnectedness. Women come to understand and consider problems
all at once. They take a broad or "collective" perspective, and they view elements in a task as
interconnected and interdependent. Women are prone to become overwhelmed with complexities
that "exist", or may exist, and may have difficulty separating their personal experience from
problems.
Men tend to focus on one problem at a time or a limited number of problems at a time. They
have an enhanced ability to separate themselves from problems and minimize the complexity
that may exist. Men come to understand and consider problems one piece at a time. They take a
linear or sequential perspective, and view elements in a task as less interconnected and more
independent. Men are prone to minimize and fail to appreciate subtleties that can be crucial to
successful solutions. A male may work through a problem repeatedly, talking about the same
thing over and over, rather than trying to address the the problem all at once.
While there are differences in the ways that men and women think, it must be emphasized that
they can and do solve problems in a similar manner. There are no absolutes, only tendencies.
Memory
Women have an enhanced ability to recall memories that have strong emotional components.
They can also recall events or experiences that have similar emotions in common. Women are
very adept at recalling information, events or experiences in which there is a common emotional
theme. Men tend to recall events using strategies that rely on reconstructing the experience in
terms of elements, tasks or activities that took place. Profound experiences that are associated
with competition or physical activities are more easily recalled. There appears to be a structural
and chemical basis for observed memory differences. For instance, the hippocampus, the area in
the brain primarily responsible for memory, reacts differently to testosterone in men and it reacts
differently to changing levels of estrogen and progesterone in women. Women tend to remember
or be reminded of different "emotional memories" and content to some extent as part of their
menstrual cycle.
Sensitivity
There is evidence to suggest that a great deal of the sensitivity that exists within men and women
has a physiological basis. It has been observed that is many cases, women have an enhanced
physical alarm response to danger or threat. Their autonomic and sympathetic systems have a
lower threshold of arousal and greater reactivity than men. In both men and women, higher
levels of testosterone directly affect the aggressive response and behavior centers of the brain.
Increasing estrogen and progesterone in men has a "feminizing" effect. Sexually aggressive
males become less focused on sexual aggressive behavior and content when they are given
female hormones. On the other hand, changing estrogen and progesterone levels in women
during menstrual cycles can produce a "flood" of memories as well as strong emotions.
Increasing or high levels of testosterone can produce an emotional insensitivity, empathic block
and increased indifference to the distress others.
At the heart of sensitivity is our capacity to form, appreciate and maintain relationships that are
rewarding. Even here there are important differences. For men, what demonstrates a solid
relationship is quite different from that of most women. Men feel closer and validated through
shared activities. Such activities include sports, competition, outdoor activities or sexual
activities that are decidedly active and physical. While both men and women can appreciate and
engage in these activities they often have preferential differences. Women, on the other hand,
feel closer and validated through communication, dialogue and intimate sharing of experience,
emotional content and personal perspectives. Many men tend to find such sharing and
involvement uncomfortable, if not, overwhelming.
The task that faces men and women is to learn to accept their differences, avoid taking their
differences as personal attempts to frustrate each other, and to compromise whenever possible.
The idea that one gender can think and feel like the other if they truly loved each is rather absurd.
Sure, a man or women could act in consideration of the others needs, but this would not
necessarily be rewarding and honest. Holding the benefit of another above our own is rewarding.
But from time to time, and more often for most of us, it is important to be our self and to be
accepted, and not to be the source of distress and disappointment in the lives of people we love.
Counseling and therapy can help a couple understand and appreciate each other, and even benefit
from their differences. Understanding these differences intellectually is not enough. A counselor
or therapist can help point out these differences, as they surface, and guide a couple to a greater
level of relationship. Understanding that differences are not intentional and that
misunderstandings are merely the result of expectations that are not realistic can make a huge
difference in a relationship. The differences that can be sensed between a man and women can
deepen their relationship. More importantly, when men seek to understand and appreciate that
which is feminine, they come to a deeper understanding of their self. And when a women seeks
to understand that which is masculine in men, they come to appreciate and understand more
about their own masculinity.
others. Not that Im any less busy than my coworkers, but I know how to remain focused
and get the job done.
My least favorite part of serving is bad tips. Not every customer will appreciate my service
as much as others. But its not something I can change, and I try not to take it personally. I
cant expect every customer to tip the way I would.