Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Placenta
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/placenta
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Accepted 10 March 2014
Objective: To determine oxidative stress markers in maternal obesity during pregnancy and to evaluate
feto-placental unit interaction, especially predictors of fetal metabolic alterations.
Patients and methods: 40 obese pregnant women (prepregnancy BMI > 30 kg/m2) were compared to 50
control pregnant women. Maternal, cord blood and placenta samples were collected at delivery.
Biochemical parameters (total cholesterol and triglycerides) and oxidative stress markers (malondialdehyde, carbonyl proteins, superoxide anion expressed as reduced Nitroblue Tetrazolium, nitric oxide
expressed as nitrite, reduced glutathione, catalase, superoxide dismutase) were assayed by biochemical
methods.
Results: Maternal, fetal and placental triglyceride levels were increased in obese group compared to
control. Maternal malondialdehyde, carbonyl proteins, nitric oxide and superoxide anion levels were
high while reduced glutathione concentrations and superoxide dismutase activity were low in obesity. In
the placenta and in newborns of these obese mothers, variations of redox balance were also observed
indicating high oxidative stress. Maternal and placental interaction constituted a strong predictor of fetal
redox variations in obese pregnancies.
Discussion: Maternal obesity compromised placental metabolism and antioxidant status which strongly
impacted fetal redox balance. Oxidative stress may be one of the key downstream mediators that initiate
programming of the offspring.
Conclusion: Maternal obesity is associated with metabolic alterations and dysregulation of redox balance
in the mother-placenta e fetus unit. These perturbations could lead to maternal and fetal complications
and should be carefully considered.
2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Pregnancy
Obesity
Mother
Newborn
Placenta
Oxidative stress
1. Introduction
Obesity is a public health problem in most industrialized
countries, and is now expanding to developing countries [1]. The
rise in the prevalence of obesity might result from the increasingly
sedentary lifestyle associated with a reduction in daily physical
activity and/or from changes in eating behavior, both quantitatively
and qualitatively that may play a role in early childhood [2]. Obesity
is a risk factor for the development of several chronic diseases such
as cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, diabetes type II, hypertension and some forms of cancer [3]. The importance of the intrauterine and neonatal metabolic environment as possible
412
Table 1
Maternal and neonate characteristics.
Characteristics
Control
Obese
Number
Age (years)
Prepregnancy BMI (kg/m2)
Number of gestations
Parity
Gestational age (weeks)
Birth weight (Kg)
M/F sex ratio
Total cholesterol
Mothers (g/L)
Newborns (g/L)
Placenta (mg/g)
Triglycerides
Mothers (g/L)
Newborns (g/L)
Placenta (mg/g)
50
29 5.25
22.61 2.13
2.81 1.33
2.69 1.30
38 1
3.34 0.31
28/22
40
31.31 5.91
33.17 3.40**
3.56 2.00
3.12 1.63
38 1
4.28 0.35*
23/17
1.88 0.35
0.55 0.06
5.18 0.64
1.79 0.21
0.46 0.05
5.73 0.53
1.43 0.20
0.41 0.06
6.59 0.51
2.28 0.11**
0.68 0.07*
9.94 0.47*
Values are means SD. BMI: body mass index (weight/height2); M/F: males/females. Signicant differences between obese and control groups are indicated as:
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
erythrocytes were washed and hemolysed by the addition of cold distilled water (1/
4). The hemolysates were appraised for erythrocyte oxidant/antioxidant status.
2.3. Placental samples
Placentas were collected immediately following delivery, within 10 min of delivery, and washed with saline water to eliminate the blood. Each placenta was
weighed and sampled in three main regions (central region, mid placenta and peripheral region). Placental samples were snap frozen and stored at 80 C until
further analysis.
All samples were homogenized in four volumes of phosphate buffered saline
(PBS) containing proteolytic enzyme inhibitors (Complete-Mini; Roche), using an
Ultra-Turex homogenizer (Bioblock Scientic, Illkirch, France). Samples were then
centrifuged for 30 min at 4000 rpm and the supernatant was collected for
biochemical analysis.
2.4. Determination of biochemical parameters
Plasma or placental homogenate cholesterol and triglycerides were determined
by enzymatic methods (Kits Sigma Chemical Company, St Louis, MO, USA).
2.5. Determination of markers of the oxidant/antioxidant status
Nitric oxide (NO) was determined by the method of Guevara et al. [22], after
plasma or placental homogenate deproteinizing procedure (using methanol:diethylether; 3:1 mixture v/v). Nitrite and nitrate levels were measured
together; nitrate being previously transformed to nitrite by cadmium reduction.
Nitrite was assayed directly spectrophotometrically at 492 nm, using the colorimetric method of Griess (Griess reagent: 1 g/L sulfanilamide, 25 g/L phosphoric acid,
and 0.1 g/L N-1-naphthylethylenediamine). Calibration curves were made with sodium nitrite in concentrations from 1 to 50 mmol/L. The inter- and intra-assay variations were 3.40% and 2.50%, respectively. The determination of the superoxide
anion (O2) was based on Nitro Blue Tetrazolium (NBT) reduction in monofarmazan
by O2 [23]. The blue formazan was dissolved using 2M potassium hydroxide and
dimethylsulfoxide and its formation was monitored spectrophotometrically at
560 nm using the molar extinction coefcient (1.5 104 M1 $ cm1).
The catalase activity (CAT, EC 1.11.1.6) was measured by spectrophotometric
analysis of the decomposition rate of hydrogen peroxide according to the method of
Aebi [24]. The reaction was initiated by addition of placental homogenate or
hemolysate to the reaction mixture containing phosphate buffer (0.05 M, pH 7.2)
and H2O2. Change in absorbance was recorded spectrophotometrically at 240. The
results were expressed as unit of catalase activity corresponding to mmol of H2O2
decomposed per minute using the H2O2 standard curve. The inter- and intra-assay
variations were 2.40% and 3%, respectively.
The assessment of the enzymatic activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD, EC
1.15.1.1) was based on the ability to inhibit pyrogallol autoxidation, with one unit of
SOD activity the amount that causes 50% inhibition of the oxidation of pyrogallol
[25]. SOD activity was measured every 5 min over 1 h at 405 nm, for 1/20 dilution of
placental homogenate and 1/5 dilution of hemolysate. The inter- and intra-assay
variations were 3% and 3.80%, respectively.
Hemolysate or placental homogenate reduced glutathione (GSH) levels were
assayed by a colorimetric method based on the reduction of 5,5-dithiobis-(2nitrobenzoic) acid (DTNB) by GSH to generate 2-nitro-5-thiobenzoic acid which
has yellow color, according a Sigma Aldrich Kit (Saint Louis, MO, USA). The absorbance at 412 nm was measured, and the GSH concentration was then determined
with the GSH standard curve. The inter- and intra-assay variations were 1% and
0.50%, respectively.
Plasma or placental homogenate carbonyl proteins (marker of protein oxidation)
by the derivatization of protein carbonyl groups with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine
(DNPH) leading to the formation of stable dinitrophenyl (DNP) hydrazone adducts,
which can be detected spectrophotometrically at 375 nm (Sigma Aldrich Kit (Saint
Louis, MO, USA). Oxidized BSA standard was used for the standard curve. The interand intra-assay variations were 0.40% and 0.60%, respectively.
Plasma or placental homogenate malondialdehyde (MDA, marker of lipid peroxidation) was estimated by the method of Draper and Hadley et al. [26] using
thiobarbituric acid (TBA). Absorbance was measured at 532 nm. The results were
expressed as micromoles of MDA, using the molar extinction coefcient of chromophore (1.56 105 M1 cm1). The inter- and intra-assay variations were 3.50%
and 3%, respectively.
2.6. Statistical analysis
The results are presented as means and standard deviations. A priori power
analysis was performed to determine the sample size, using power and sample size
calculator (Statistical solutions, Sigma). We calculated that a sample of 50 normal
pregnant and 40 obese women would give us a 95% power of detecting a 25% difference in measurements. The results were tested for normal distribution using the
ShapiroeWilk test. After variance analysis, Students t-test was used to compare
means between normal weight and obese groups, for different parameters. The
multiple regression analysis was performed with dependent variables (lipid parameters and markers of oxidant/antioxidant status in neonates) and independent
3. Results
3.1. Lipids and redox balance
Maternal, fetal and placental cholesterol levels showed no signicant difference in the obese group compared to the normal weight
group. In contrast, a signicant increase in maternal, fetal and
placental triglyceride levels was found in the obese group (Table 1).
In obese mothers, oxidant/antioxidant status alterations were
marked by a signicant increase in plasma concentrations of
malondialdehyde, carbonyl proteins, nitrite (reecting nitric oxide)
and reduced NBT (reecting anion superoxide production), and a
signicant decrease in reduced glutathione levels and in erythrocyte
superoxide dismutase activity compared to control values (Figs. 1
and 2). In their newborns, the levels of malondialdehyde, nitrite,
reduced NBT as well as erythrocyte activities of catalase and superoxide dismutase were signicantly high compared to the control
values (Figs.1 and 2). Furthermore, in the placenta of obese mothers,
a signicant increase was noted in the levels of malondialdehyde,
carbonyl protein, reduced glutathione and also in antioxidant
enzyme activities (superoxide dismutase and catalase) compared to
values obtained with placentas from control mothers (Figs. 1 and 2).
3.2. Predictors of fetal metabolic alterations
In order to investigate the inuence of maternal and placental
metabolic changes on fetal metabolism, a multiple regression
413
Fig. 1. Antioxidant status in mothers and their newborns and placentas. Each value represents the mean standard deviation. GSH: reduced glutathione; SOD: superoxide dismutase. The signicance of the differences between obese and control group was determined by the students t-test after analysis of variance:*P < 0.05. **P < 0.01.
414
Fig. 2. Oxidant status in mothers and their newborns and placentas. Each value represents the mean standard deviation. CP: carbonyl proteins; MDA: malondialdehyde; NO:
nitric oxide; O2: superoxide anion. The signicance of the differences between obese and control group was determined by the students t-test after analysis of variance:*P < 0.05.
**P < 0.01.
4. Discussion
This study revealed changes in maternal, fetal and placental
redox status as well as the maternal-placental-fetal interactions
during obesity. Obesity is commonly associated with metabolic
changes with high cardiovascular risk [3]. These metabolic alterations increase during pregnancy [5,6]. In our study, neither the
obese women nor their neonates had any complications. These
obese women presented elevated plasma triglyceride levels; whereas
total plasma cholesterol levels were similar to those of normal
weight women. Similar anomalies were noted in newborns and in
placentas of the obese group. Our ndings were in agreement with
those of other authors who showed high serum triglyceride levels in
obese women and their newborns compared with those of control
group [20,27]. Increased estrogens levels and insulin resistance
during pregnancy are responsible for this hypertriglyceridemia [28].
High triglyceride levels in newborns of obese mothers were correlated to their birth weights which were increased compared to
controls [27]. We have previously found that normal weight newborns of obese mothers had triglyceride levels similar to those found
in control newborns [21]. It has been shown that placental lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity is high in obese pregnancies [29]. In the
placenta, LPL hydrolyzes triglycerides from maternal circulation to
release free fatty acids (FFA), which are transferred to the placenta,
and then esteried to triglycerides. Other authors have noted an
accumulation of triglycerides in the placenta of obese women
[30].The multiple regression analysis in the control group showed
that although maternal or placental lipid levels are not independently correlated to those of the fetus, the maternaleplacental
Mothers
variables
Placenta
variables
Interaction
Mother-placenta
0.132 (0.061)
0.215
e
0.184 (0.053)
0.119
e
0.416 (0.065)
0.015
0.38
0.136 (0.040)
0.138
e
0.194 (0.020)
0.140
e
0.424 (0.069)
0.014
0.39
0.082 (0.050)
0.102
e
0.102 (0.041)
0.147
e
0.155 (0.077)
0.125
0.07
0.147 (0.032)
0.139
e
0.125 (0.051)
0.108
e
0.199 (0.078)
0.089
0.10
0.187 (0.071)
0.107
e
0.117 (0.064)
0.114
e
0.188 (0.027)
0.095
0.11
0.111 (0.037)
0.175
e
0.157 (0.027)
0.116
e
0.158 (0.063)
0.115
0.09
0.142 (0.070)
0.104
e
0.181 (0.030)
0.111
e
0.182 (0.083)
0.101
0.12
0.201 (0.073)
0.108
e
0.128 (0.076)
0.143
e
0.199 (0.051)
0.168
0.07
0.102 (0.052)
0.222
e
0.152 (0.075)
0.177
e
0.165 (0.077)
0.125
0.06
B (ES) are the correlation coefcients (standard error) of each independent variable
with the dependent variable. R2 is the coefcient of determination and provides the
percentage of variance explained by all variables. Relationships are signicant at
p < 0.05.
415
416
Table 3
Multivariate analysis in the Obese group.
Dependent variables
(newborn)
Cholesterol
B (ES)
P
R2
Triglycerides
B (ES)
P
R2
Malondialdehyde
B (ES)
P
R2
Carbonyl proteins
B (ES)
P
R2
Nitrite
B (ES)
P
R2
red. NBT
B (ES)
P
R2
Catalase
B (ES)
P
R2
Superoxide dismutase
B (ES)
P
R2
Reduced glutathione
B (ES)
P
R2
Mother
variables
Placenta
variables
Interaction
mother e placenta
0.111 (0.039)
0.108
e
0.124 (0.026)
0.192
e
0.413 (0.081)
0.019
0.35
0.483 (0.053)
0.007
e
0.547 (0.095)
0.005
e
0.829 (0.028)
0.001
0.64
0.443 (0.065)
0.008
e
0.487 (0.055)
0.005
e
0.526 (0.028)
0.004
0.47
0.142 (0.045)
0.112
e
0.125 (0.054)
0.115
e
0.146 (0.038)
0.107
0.05
0.358 (0.067)
0.010
e
0.136 (0.071)
0.123
e
0.458 (0.044)
0.008
0.42
0.339 (0.046)
0.012
e
0.190 (0.045)
0.118
e
0.480 (0.031)
0.007
0.43
0.172 (0.060)
0.226
e
0.303 (0.082)
0.030
e
0.496 (0.055)
0.005
0.44
0.284 (0.052)
0.070
e
0.328 (0.040)
0.039
e
0.485 (0.078)
0.006
0.43
0.184 (0.078)
0.140
e
0.166 (0.078)
0.116
e
0.209 (0.037)
0.155
0.06
B (ES) are the correlation coefcients (standard error) of each independent variable
with the dependent variable. R2 is the coefcient of determination and provides the
percentage of variance explained by all variables. Relationships are signicant at
p < 0.05.
[5] Dixit A, Girling JC. Obesity and pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol 2008;28(1):14e23.
[6] Deruelle P. Obesity and pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2011;39(2):100e5.
[7] Crane JM, White J, Murphy P, Burrage L, Hutchens D. The effect of gestational
weight gain by body mass index on maternal and neonatal outcomes. J Obstet
Gynaecol Can 2009;31(1):28e35.
[8] Catalano PM, Presley L, Minium J. Fetuses of obese mothers develop insulin
resistance in utero. Diabetes Care 2009;32:1076e80.
[9] Heerwagen MJR, Miller MR, Barbour LA, Friedman JE. Maternal obesity and
fetal metabolic programming: a fertile epigenetic soil. Am J Physiol Regul
Integr Comp Physiol 2010;299:711e22.
[10] Godfrey K, Robinson S. Maternal nutrition, placental growth and fetal programming. Proc Nutr Soc 1998;57:105e11.
[11] Thornburg KL, OTierney PF, Louey S. The placenta is a programming agent for
cardiovascular disease. Placenta 2010;31:54e9.
[12] Catalano PM, Thomas A, Huston-Presley L, Amini SB. Increased fetal adiposity:
a very sensitive marker of abnormal in utero development. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 2003;189:1698e704.
[13] Reynolds LP, Borowicz PP, Caton JS, Vonnahme KA, Luther JS, Hammer JC, et al.
Developmental programming: the concept, large animal models, and the key
role of uteroplacental vascular development. J Anim Sci 2010;88:61e72.
[14] Furukawa S, Fujita T, Shimabukuro M, Iwaki M, Yamada Y, Nakajima Y, et al.
Increased oxidative stress in obesity and its impact on metabolic syndrome.
J Clin Invest 2004;114(12):1752e61.
[15] Buonocore G, Perrone S. Biomarkers of oxidative stress in the fetus and
newborn. Hematology 2006;10:103e7.
[16] Ademuyiwa O, Odusoga OL, Adebawo OO, Ugbaja RN. Endogenous antioxidant
defences in plasma and erythrocytes of pregnant women during different
trimesters of pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007:1e6.
[17] Mueller A, Koebnick C, Binder H, Hoffmann I, Schild RL, Beckmann MW, et al.
Placental defense is considered sufcient to control lipid peroxidation in
pregnancy. Med Hypotheses 2005;64(3):553e7.
[18] Dennery PA. Effects of oxidative stress on embryonic development. Birth
Defects Res C Embryo Today 2007;81(3):155e62.
[19] Siddiqui IA, Jaleel A, Tamimi W, Al Kadri HMF. Role of oxidative stress in the
pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010;282:469e74.
[20] Redman CW, Sargent IL. Placental stress and preeclampsia: a revised view.
Placenta 2009;30:38e42.
[21] Malti N, Merzouk H, Baba Ahmed FZ, Merzouk S, Malti A, Tessier C, et al.
Oxidative stress biomarkers in obese mothers and their appropriate for
gestational age newborn. J Clin Diag Res 2010;4:2237e45.
ska-Kie
[22] Guevara I, Iwanejko J, Dembin
c A, Pankiewicz J, Wanat A, Anna P, et al.
Determination of nitrite/nitrate in human biological material by the simple
Griess reaction. Clin Chim Acta 1998;274:177e88.
[23] Auclair C, Voisin E. Nitroblue-tetrazolium reduction. In: Greenwald RA, editor.
Handbook of methods for oxygen radical research. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Inc;
1985. pp. 123e32.
[24] Aebi H, Catalase. In: Bergmeyer, editor. In methods of enzymatic analysis. 2nd
ed.vol. 2. Weinheim: Verlagchimie Gmmbb; 1974. pp. 673e84.
[25] Marklund SL. Pyrogallol autooxidation. In: Greenwald RA, editor. Handbook of
methods for oxygen radical. Boca raton, Fla: CRC Press; 1985. pp. 243e7.
[26] Draper HH, Hadley M. Malondialdehyde determination as index of lipid
peroxidation. Methods Enzymol 1990;186:421e8.
[27] Merzouk H, Meghelli-Bouchenak M, Loukidi B, Prost J, Belleville J. Impaired
serum lipids and lipoproteins in fetal macrosomia related to maternal obesity.
Biol Neonate 2000;77:17e24.
[28] Neary RH, Kilby MD, Kumpatula P, Game FL, Bhatnagar D, Dirrington PN, et al.
Fetal and maternal lipoprotein metabolism in human pregnancy. Clin Sci
1995;88:311e8.
[29] Guerre-Millo M, Hauguel de Mouzon S. Placenta et obsit. Mdecine Thrapeutique/mdecine de la reproduction 2005;7(4):287e91.
[30] Colomiere M, Permezel M, Riley C, Desoye G, Lappas M. Defective insulin
signaling in placenta from pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes
mellitus. Eur J Endocrinol 2009;160:567e78.
[31] Haleng J, Pincemail J, Defraigne JO, Charlier C, Chapelle JP. Oxidative stress.
Rev Med Liege 2007;62(10):628e38.
[32] Bonnefont-Rousselot D, Bastard JP, Jaudon MC, Delattre J. Consequences of the
diabetic statut on the oxidant/antioxidant balance. Diabetes Metab 2000;26:
163e76.
[33] Vincent HK, Innes KE, Vincent KR. Oxidative stress and potential interventions
to reduce oxidative stress in overweight and obesity. Diabetes Obes Metab
2007;9(6):813e39.
[34] Al-Gubory KH, Fowler PA, Garrel C. The roles of cellular reactive oxygen
species, oxidative stress and antioxidants in pregnancy outcomes. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2010;42(10):1634e50.
[35] Myatt L. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and functional adaptation of
the placenta. Placenta 2010;31:66e9.
[36] Dandona P, Aljada A, Chaudhuri A, Mohanty P, Garg R. Metabolic syndrome: a
comprehensive perspective based on interactions between obesity, diabetes,
and inammation. Circulation 2005;111:1448e54.
[37] Myatt L, Cui X. Oxidative stress in the placenta. Histochem Cell Biol
2004;122(4):369e82.
[38] Qanungo S, Mukherjea M. Ontogenic prole of some antioxidants and lipid
peroxidation in human placental and fetal tissues. Mol Cell Biochem
2000;215:11e9.