Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
CAT 2015 was being watched with a lot of anticipation due to the major changes in the pattern this year both
on the content and technology front. The actual exam seems to have gone some way in changing the growing
perception over the last 3-4 years that CAT had diluted its quality. However, the exam this year (across both
slots) was highly skewed in terms of difficulty level across sections, which would have made planning of
attempts difficult.
The general feedback across both slots was that VA was on the easy to moderate side followed by an extremely
tough DILR section and a relatively easy QA section. Hence, the sectional cut-offs are also expected to have large
variations. The number of direct entry questions also varied significantly across sections. However, all of them
should have been attempted as there was no negative marking for them.
One issue with the test was the presence of incorrect instructions given before the start of the test. The demo
test released earlier had clearly mentioned that RC passages will have 3 or 6 questions (which was also followed
by the actual test) whereas the instructions incorrectly mentioned blocks of 4 questions each, which would have
added to students anxiety before the test.
Summary
Number of Sections
Number of questions
Variable
Negative Marking
Total Time
180 minutes
Sectional Timings
www.TestFunda.com
Arithmetic Averages, Percentages, Profit and Loss, Ratio and Proportion, Time and Distance
Algebra Logarithms, Linear and Quadratic Equations, Inequalities
Geometry Properties of geometric figures (circles, triangles, quadrilaterals), co-ordinate geometry and
mensuration
Modern Maths Sequences and Series, Functions, Set Theory and P & C
The high difficulty level of the previous section (DILR) may have affected the confidence of students at the
beginning of this section. However, on the whole, 25-27 attempts with atleast 85% accuracy would have
been a good performance.
A student attempting 72-74 questions in this test could consider it a good performance.
www.TestFunda.com