Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PG student, Department of Civil Engineering, Rajarambapu Institute of Technology, Rajaramnagar, Islampur, Dist.
Sangli, Maharashtra, India - 415414
2
Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Rajarambapu Institute of Technology, Rajaramnagar, Islampur, Dist.
Sangli, Maharashtra, India 415414
Abstract
This paper presents the flexural behaviour of Aramid fiber reinforced polymer (AFRP) strengthened reinforced concrete (RC)
beams of M25 grade of concrete. The experimental program included strengthening and testing of simply supported rectangular
cross section beam of size 100mm x 150mm x 1200 mm strengthened with Aramid fiber polymer sheets. Total twenty specimens
were tested out of which two beam specimens were tested as control beams and remaining for various damage degrees (i.e. 0%,
70%, 80%, 90%, and 100%). The effects of strengthening on load carrying capacity and effect of damage degree are discussed in
detail. The results indicate that the load carrying capacity of beams was significantly increased as the number of layer increased.
The validation of the experimental results was done by using ANSYS software. In order to study the flexural behaviour of the
beam, the specimens were only subjected to two point loading mechanism only. The beams were wrapped with AFRP sheets in
single layer and double layers along the length at the bottom face of the beam. The present work includes Effect of damage degree
of the beam and effect of number of layers. Thus it is a feasible method for strengthening and retrofitting of RC beams.
300
1450
0.4
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 07 | Jul-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
316
2. EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM
The experimental program consisted of casting reinforced
concrete beams, with various degree of damaging, number
of layer of applying the AFRP sheets and testing them under
two point loading on a Universal Testing Machine of
capacity 600 kN.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 07 | Jul-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
317
3.1 Concrete
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 07 | Jul-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
318
90
80
70
Load (kN)
60
50
SLB
40
DLB
30
20
10
0
2
4
6
Deflection (mm)
Fig. 11 Load versus deflection curve for comparison of
SLB, DLB
90
80
70
Load (kN)
60
50
SLC
40
DLC
30
20
10
0
4
Deflection (mm)
Load (kN)
Load (kN)
50
SLA
DLA
CB
40
SLD
30
DLD
20
10
0
2
3 (mm)
4
Deflection
4
Deflection (mm)
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 07 | Jul-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
319
5. CONCLUSIONS
70
60
Load (kN)
50
40
SLE
30
DLE
20
10
0
0
4
Deflection (mm)
REFERENCES
Load (kN)
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Expt.
Ansys
2
4
Deflection (mm)
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 07 | Jul-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
320
BIOGRAPHIES
Mr. Rameshkumar U. More, PG
student M-tech Civil Structure,
Rajarambapu Institute of Technology,
Rajaramnagar, Sangli, Maharashtra,
India
Prof.
Dattatraya
B.
Kulkarni,
Associate
Professor
,
Civil
Engineering Department Rajarambapu
Institute
of
Technology,
Rajaramnagar, Sangli, Maharashtra,
India.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Volume: 03 Issue: 07 | Jul-2014, Available @ http://www.ijret.org
321