Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
MD Finantarea 201 PDF
MD Finantarea 201 PDF
CUPRINS
Lista abrevierilor.................................................................................................... 9
Introducere ........................................................................................................... 10
Metodologia aplicat ........................................................................................... 12
Sumar executiv .................................................................................................... 13
Capitolul 1. Rolul Ministerului Economiei privind ameliorarea mediului
financiar n scopul susinerii IMM-urilor
1.1. Introducere ...........................................................................................................18
1.2. Creditele bncilor comerciale .............................................................................19
1.3. Creditele organizaiilor de microfinanare ............................................................20
1.4. Mijloacele fondului special de garantare a creditelor ...........................................21
1.5. Mijloacele programelor de asisten financiar pentru anumite
grupuri de ntreprinztori ......................................................................................22
1.6. Rezultatele sondajelor ntreprinztorilor din Moldova ..........................................22
1.7. Concluzii i recomandri ......................................................................................23
Capitolul 2. Oportuniti de atragere a investiiilor strine n sectorul IMM
2.1. Introducere ...........................................................................................................25
2.2. Investiiile strine i motivaia pentru atragerea lor ..............................................26
2.3. Evoluia investiiilor strine directe n context mondial i regional .......................29
2.4. Evoluia investiiilor strine directe n economia R. Moldova i n
sectorul IMM ........................................................................................................33
2.5. Climatul investiional n Republica Moldova ........................................................44
2.6. Concluzii i recomandri ......................................................................................50
Capitolul 3. Fiscalitatea ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii n Moldova
3.1. Introducere ...........................................................................................................53
3.2. Importana suportului din partea statului pentru MM ..........................................54
3.3. Aspecte generale privind apariia raporturilor fiscale ale agenilor economici
cu statul ...............................................................................................................56
3.4. Interaciunea sistemului fiscal al Republicii Moldova cu sistemul fiscal
al ntreprinderii .....................................................................................................59
3.5. Gestiunea fiscal a ntreprinderii .........................................................................61
3.6. Prevederile legale privind fiscalitatea MM ..........................................................62
3.7. Presiunea fiscal: abordri generale ...................................................................63
3.8. Nivelul presiunii fiscale n Republica Moldova .....................................................66
3.9. Comentariile participanilor mesei rotunde la Codul fiscal privind
fiscalitatea ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii .............................................................68
3.10. Concluzii i recomandri ......................................................................................70
Capitolul 4. Servicii bancare la distan: avantaje i oportuniti pentru MM
pe piaa Republicii Moldova
4.1. Introducere ...........................................................................................................72
4.2.
4.3.
4.4.
4.5.
4.6.
................................................................................................113
............................................................................................................. 114
.............................................................................. 116
................................................................................................................. 117
1.
1.1. .............................................................................................................122
1.2. .........................................................................123
1.3. ........................................................124
1.4. .............................125
1.5. ,
..........................................................126
1.6. ..........................................126
1.7. ...................................................................................127
2.
2.1. .............................................................................................................129
2.2. .........................130
2.3.
.................................................................................133
2.4.
.................................................................137
2.5. ............................................148
2.6. ...................................................................................154
3.
3.1. .............................................................................................................157
3.2. ....................................................158
3.3.
......................................................160
3.4.
.......................................................................................163
3.5. .........................................................165
3.6. ...................166
3.7. : ...................................................................168
3.8. .....................................170
3.9.
...........................................172
3.10. ...................................................................................174
4. :
4.1. .............................................................................................................177
4.2. ..............................178
4.3. -
.....................................................................................................181
4.4. .........183
4.5. ,
.......................................................................185
4.6. ...................................................................................186
5.
5.1. .............................................................................................................190
5.2. :
.....................................................191
5.3. : ...................................................193
5.4.
.....................................................................................197
5.5. - -
,
....................202
5.6. ...................................................................................210
................................................................................................. 212
CONTENTS
Acronyms ............................................................................................................. 221
Introduction.......................................................................................................... 222
Methodology applied........................................................................................... 224
Executive summary ............................................................................................. 225
Chapter 1. Role of the Ministry of Economy in improving the financial
environment in order to support SMEs
1.1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 230
1.2. Commercial banks loans ............................................................................... 231
1.3. Microfinance institutions loans ...................................................................... 232
1.4. Special Credit Guarantee Fund cash resources ........................................... 233
1.5. Funds of the financial support programs for certain groups of
entrepreneurs ................................................................................................ 234
1.6. The results of entrepreneurs surveys in Moldova ......................................... 234
1.7. Conclusions and recommendations .............................................................. 235
Chapter 2. Opportunities for attracting foreign investment in SMEs sector
2.1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 237
2.2. Foreign investment and the incentive to attract them ................................... 238
2.3. Direct foreign investment evolution in the global and regional context ......... 241
2.4. Direct foreign investment evolution in the Republic of Moldova
economy and SMEs sector ........................................................................... 245
2.5. Investment climate in the Republic of Moldova ............................................. 255
2.6. Conclusions and recommendations .............................................................. 261
Chapter 3. Taxation of SMEs in Moldova
3.1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 264
3.2. Importance of government support for SMEs ............................................... 265
3.3. General aspects regarding the fiscal relations between economic
agents with the state ..................................................................................... 267
3.4. Interaction of the Republic of Moldova tax system with the enterprise
tax system ..................................................................................................... 270
3.5. Fiscal administration of the company ............................................................ 272
3.6. Legal provisions on SMEs taxation ............................................................... 273
3.7. Tax burden: general approach ...................................................................... 274
3.8. The tax burden level in the Republic of Moldova .......................................... 277
3.9. Roundtable participants comments on the Tax Code concerning
taxation of SMEs ........................................................................................... 279
3.10. Conclusions and recommendations .............................................................. 281
Chapter 4. eBanking; advantages and prospects for the SMEs
on the Republic of Moldova market
4.1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 283
4.2. Online banking services provided in European countries ............................. 284
4.3.
4.4.
4.5.
4.6.
Autorii capitolelor:
Lista abrevierilor
ANRCETI
ATM
BNM
BNS
CTN
Companii Transnaionale
FMI
IMM
ISD
IB
Internet Banking
OMC
OTP
PARE
PNAET
POS Terminal Sistem utilizat pentru pli la locul de vnzare (Point of sale)
RM
Republica Moldova
UE
Uniunea European
UNCTAD
USD
Dolari SUA
ZEL
eBanking
eCommerce
Introducere
Importana IMM-urilor pentru economia moldoveneasc este recunoscut i
confirmat att de economiti, ct i de factorii de decizie politic. n prezent, IMMurile ocup cel mai mare procent n cadrul sectorului privat, asigurnd locuri de munc i crend valoare adugat. Astfel, conform datelor furnizate de Biroul Naional de
Statistic, n Republica Moldova, IMM-urile reprezint circa 97.5% din numrul total
de ntreprinderi, iar aproximativ 57,7% din lucrtorii economiei naionale activeaz n
cadrul IMM-urilor. Cota parte a IMM-urilor din Republica Moldova n Produsul Intern
Brut (PIB) este de circa 28,3%. Pentru comparaie putem meniona c IMM-urile n
rile din Uniunea European genereaz circa 58,4% din PIB. Evident, rmn nc
multe de realizat n acest domeniu.
n acest context, putem sublinia c Comisia European depune eforturi pentru a
asigura un mediu favorabil privind creterea i dezvoltarea IMM-urilor. Astfel, la 4 iunie
2008, a fost publicat Legea ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii (Small Business Act SBA),
prin care se recunoate rolul central al IMM-urilor n economia UE, menionnd semnificaia acestora n asigurarea procesului de inovare, ct i de coeziune economic
i social. Principiul promovat prin SBA gndii la scar mic i propune stimularea
definirii politicilor statelor membre n materie de promovare antreprenorial n concordan cu cerinele de cretere ale IMM ajutndu-le s depeasc problemele care le
mpiedic dezvoltarea.
Conform datelor sondajului realizat de Institutul de Economie, Finane i Statistic (IEFS), n anul 2012, din 136 de ntreprinztori intervievai, din 27 de raioane,
circa 73,3% din respondeni au menionat c s-au confruntat cu probleme care in de
accesul la finanare.
Acelai lucru a fost scos n eviden i de participanii la cel de-al 4-lea Forum
Moldo-German privind finanarea ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii. Acetia au confirmat
c finanarea este principala problem a IMM-urilor din Republica Moldova. Astfel,
relaia dintre IMM-uri i bnci este nc destul de tensionat. Opinia ntreprinztorilor
se rezum la urmtoarele: n Republica Moldova, obinerea unui credit presupune o
cale lung i anevoioas, deoarece bncile nu au o strategie clar privind finanarea
IMM-urilor. Din aceste considerente costurile pentru a obine un credit sunt de cteva
ori mai mari dect costurile medii europene pentru o unitate de credit iar garaniile
solicitate sunt foarte mari.
n linii mari, participanii au propus urmtoarele:
1. Bncile din Republica Moldova trebuie s-i elaboreze o strategie clar, orientat spre necesitile IMM-urilor. Bncile autohtone nu au ca preocupare principala s ajute sau s contribuie la relansarea sectorului de IMM-uri.
2. Bncile trebuie s pregteasc personalul pentru a lucra cu IMM-urile, pentru a
face conexiunea dintre oferta bncilor i cerinele IMM-urilor, ca s i ajute s
acceseze acele produse de care au nevoie i pe care sunt n stare s le administreze cu succes. Finanatorii, de regul, nu abordeaz problema finanrii n mod
individual, personalizat, n raport cu companiile interesate n obinerea creditelor, ci, dimpotriv, standardizeaz abordrile, ceea ce conduce la respingerea
clienilor i dorinei lor de a obine finanare.
10
3.
n contextul respectiv, pe data de 30 aprilie 2013, a avut loc cel de-al IV-lea
Forum Moldo - German privind finanarea ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii (IMM), organizat de Ministerul Finanelor din Germania, banca KFW (Germania), Institutul
pentru Dezvoltare i Iniiative Sociale (IDIS) Viitorul (Republica Moldova) i Comitetul Executiv din Gguzia, Comrat. n cadrul acestuia au fost organizate patru
mese rotunde cu 4 tematici diferite: 1. Oportuniti de atragere a investiiilor strine
n sectorul MM; 2. Fiscalitatea ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii n Moldova; 3. Strategiile de finanare ale IMM-urilor din sectorul agrar; 4. Banking la distan: avantaje i
perspective pentru IMM-uri.
Ulterior, n baza discuiilor efectuate i concluziilor trasate n cadrul meselor rotunde, a fost elaborat un studiu sintez ce reflect problemele majore identificate de
ctre participanii la discuii, soluiile propuse de ctre acetia i obstacolele n calea
implementrii soluiilor identificate, precum i recomandrile pentru mbuntirea
situaiei n domeniile menionate mai sus.
Prin elaborarea studiului respectiv, se urmrete evidenierea importanei antreprenoriatului mic i mijlociu pentru dezvoltarea economic i stabilitatea social a
rii, precum i facilitarea atragerii finanrilor pentru ntreprinderile mici i mijlocii pe
baza unor principii corecte, care s se adreseze necesitilor primordiale ale sectorului respectiv.
Studiul de fa reprezint mai degrab un material de referin pentru publicul
larg din Moldova i din afar, implicat n finanarea sectorului IMM care vor avea
posibilitatea s pun n aplicare concluziile i recomandrile elaborate de experii
IDIS Viitorul.
11
Metodologia aplicat
Metodologia utilizat se bazeaz pe sinteza discuiilor i concluziilor din cadrul
meselor rotunde al celui de-al IV-lea Forum Moldo-German. De asemenea, experii
implicai n elaborarea studiilor au raportat problemele i concluziile identificate n
cadrul meselor rotunde la alte analize i investigaii n domeniile cercetate. Totodat,
nainte de nceperea discuiilor, participanii au completat un chestionar n care acetia au fost rugai s puncteze problemele de baz i soluiile optimale care, n opinia
lor, ar contribui la ameliorarea situaiei n domeniul examinat.
Discuiile din cadrul meselor rotunde, precum i modul de reflectare al acestora,
poate fi reprezentat schematic n felul urmtor:
Introducerea
(10 min)
Masa rotund
Moderatorul
Cercettorul
Participanii
Moderatorul
Prezint tema
discuiei
Pregtirea dezbaterilor
(20 min)
Grupul de participani
Fiecare participant scrie
pe foaie 1-2 probleme relevante temei de discuie.
Moderatorul adun foile
i scrie pe tabl problemele menionate; dac
problemele enunate se
repet, se adaug +1 n
faa problemei.
Problemele de baz se
identific din rndul celor
care acumuleaz mai multe voturi.
Grupul de participani
Toi participanii se implic n dezbaterea colectiv pe marginea urmtoarelor aspecte ale problemei:
1. Care este problema?
2. Cum problema poate fi soluionat n principiu?
3. Ce poate fi ntreprins acum?
4. Care sunt obstacolele?
Dup discuii, se prezint rezultatele acesteia cu ajutorul markerelor
pe foi mari:
Cercettorul
Face notie i rezum probleme enumerate pentru publicaie
Care este
problema
Cum poate fi
soluionat
problema
Ce poate fi
ntreprins acum
Care sunt
obstacolele
Moderatorul
Prezint rezultatele discuiilor n edina plenar
n cadrul meselor rotunde au fost propuse unele soluii reflectate n acest studiu.
Astfel, experii IDIS Viitorul propun cititorului, credem noi, cele mai ndrznee idei
i instrumente care ar putea, cu siguran, s rezolve o parte din problemele evideniate n cadrul Forumului Moldo-German.
Liubomir CHIRIAC,
Director executiv IDIS Viitorul
12
Sumar executiv
Guvernul Republicii Moldova ncearc diverse metode i instrumente pentru ca
IMM-urile din ar s obin sprijin financiar i acces la resursele financiare prin intermediul diferitor instituii financiare internaionale, parteneri de dezvoltare i, prin
intermediul unor proiecte sau programe de creditare/finanare. n capitolul 1 Rolul Ministerului Economiei privind ameliorarea mediului financiar n scopul susinerii
IMM-urilor sunt evideniate politicile promovate de ministerul de resort, dar i
problemele care rmn de soluionat. Astfel, se atrage atenia c Guvernul Republicii
Moldova, n colaborare cu instituiile financiare, ar trebui s se axeze pe:
1. Promovarea unei politici monetare care vizeaz o inflaie sczut i stabil;
2. Reducerea ratelor dobnzilor la credite i asigurarea stabilitii acestora;
3. Atragerea investiiilor externe n sectorul financiar i implicarea partenerilor
strategici interesai n dezvoltarea sectorului IMM-urilor din Republica Moldova;
4. Dezvoltarea garaniilor de credit pentru IMM-uri, inclusiv prin intermediul
Fondului de Garantare de Stat;
5. Dezvoltarea unor sisteme financiare inovatoare privind susinerea ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii;
Mai jos vom puncta cele mai importante idei generate n cadrul meselor rotunde
desfurate n cadrul Forumului.
n capitolul 2 sunt examinate oportunitile de atragere a investiiilor strine n sectorul IMM. Este cunoscut faptul c investiiile strine directe (ISD) sunt
definite ca ansamblul fluxurilor financiare, materiale, tehnologice i manageriale pe
care o persoan fizic sau juridic le desfoar ntr-o alt economie dect cea n
care este rezident, pentru realizarea unei activiti productive de durat, prin deinerea controlului asupra acestuia. Atragerea investiiilor strine n sectorul IMM rmne
o problem major pentru ara noastr. n acest context, este necesar ca factorii
de decizie s atrag atenie n mod deosebit la tendinele i factorii care nsoesc
evoluia fluxurilor de ISD pe plan mondial, la formularea politicilor i strategiilor de
dezvoltare economic a Republicii Moldova i, ce e mai important, s ntreprind
pai concrei pentru ralierea practic la acestea, pentru a nu rmne n urma curentului mondial, ceea ce ar nsemna perpetuarea strii actuale sau chiar majorarea
decalajului enorm fa de rile din regiune. n general, aceleai evidene de pe plan
mondial i regional sugereaz c interveniile autoritilor la nivel de politici trebuie
s fie ndreptate primordial spre asigurarea unui mediu economic favorabil. n
mod special, aceasta se refer la asigurarea unui mediu de afaceri i investiional
atractiv, educaia i politicile de instruire orientate spre ridicarea calificrii generale
a forei de munc, politicile tehnologice orientate spre dezvoltarea clusterelor i politicile publice cu privire la investiii, menite s dezvolte reele eficiente i sigure de
transport i comunicaii i infrastructur.
13
Astfel, reuita Moldovei n atragerea ISD n economie i n sectorul IMM, ca sectorul cel mai reprezentativ al economiei sale, va depinde preponderent de politicile
guvernamentale aplicate. n acest sens, att teoria, ct i practica economic, inclusiv experiena celorlalte state central i est europene, demonstreaz att importana
crerii unui mediu de afaceri i investiional atractiv, aplicrii unor msuri pro-active,
de atragere a ISD, ct i a modernizrii infrastructurii i creterii nivelului de pregtire
a forei de munc. n acest context, strategiile i politicile de atragere a ISD n Republica Moldova trebuie s se axeze cu prioritate pe aceste aspecte, singura opiune
viabil n vederea reducerii decalajelor fa de celelalte state din regiune. Drept urmare, principalele msuri ar trebui s vizeze urmtoarele aspecte:
mbuntirea cadrului de reglementare al activitii de afaceri, al administrrii fiscale i vamale, reducerii birocraiei de stat, a poverii administrative i a
corupiei, ridicrii eficienei i funcionalitii instituiilor de stat.
mbuntirea calitii resurselor umane, prin creterea investiiilor n educaie i instruire, inclusiv a celor care urmresc formarea continu a forei de
munc;
Stimularea formrii clusterelor bazate pe activiti nrudite, n special n sectorul IMM, acestea servind ca magnet important pentru ISD. Concentrarea
eforturilor pe domeniile, sau activitile particulare, n care efectele de la ISD
sunt importante;
Capitolul 3 este dedicat problemelor legate de impozitarea IMM-urilor. Astfel, pot fi evideniate cinci probleme principale legate de impozitarea businessului
mic i mijlociu:
14
1. Sistemul fiscal actual din Republica Moldova nu ncurajeaz suficient mecanismul investiional al ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii. La nivel naional nu
exist o argumentare a posibilitii de plat a impozitelor pe veniturile subiecilor antreprenoriatului mic i mijlociu care se afl la etapa nceptoare
de desfurare a activitii i, din anumite motive, nu au venituri (lund n
considerare necesitatea de a efectua alte pli obligatorii: la nregistrare, liceniere, primirea patentei).
2. Impozitarea ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii nu are legtur suficient cu parametrii de producie a activitii, ce, n consecin, inhib dezvoltarea businessului mic i mijlociu.
3. n condiiile economiei Republicii Moldova ar fi mai eficient de aplicat instrumente fiscale de corectare, care, spre deosebire de cele neutre, vor permite
orientarea activitii antreprenoriale, investiiilor, forei de munc n ramurile
cheie pentru economia naional i local.
4. Egalitatea contribuabililor trebuie, printr-o serie de scutiri i scheme fiscale,
s compenseze ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii riscurile sporite, accesul limitat
la resurse n comparaie cu ali actori economici, oferirea unui grad sporit de
libertate administraiilor locale n reglementarea parametrilor sistemului de
impozitare a ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii, care au specific local.
5. Potenialul fiscal al sistemului de impozitare a ntreprinderilor din cadrul businessului mic i mijlociu, actualmente, nu este suficient realizat ca urmare a
funcionrii haotice a formelor fiscale, care acioneaz izolat una de alta.
Participanii la masa rotund, n scopul perfecionrii sistemului de impunere
fiscal a businessului mic i mijlociu, au propus urmtoarele ci de soluionare a
problemelor menionate mai sus:
reglementarea ratelor dobnzilor pentru credite interbancare, precum i pentru credite oferite sectorului real. Stabilirea limitei pentru diferena dintre rata
dobnzii la care Banca Naional a Moldovei ofer credite bncilor comerciale i ratele dobnzilor la creditele acordate sectorul real (nu mai mult de 3%);
introducerea n echipa administraiei publice locale a unei funcii de reprezentant special la nivel de vice-primar sau vice-preedintele raionului, care
ar fi responsabil de sistemul i numrul de controale al ntreprinderilor mici i
mijlocii.
n capitolul 4 sunt examinate serviciile electronice la distan destinate
IMM-urilor din Republica Moldova. Din spectrul de servicii bancare, micul business (inclusiv cel micro) preponderent are nevoie: s efectueze o serie de pli/transferuri, pli bugetare; s plteasc salariile la civa salariai; de faciliti pentru patron,
business card pentru efectuarea achiziiilor; de consultare a contului, extrase; pentru
retaileri - servicii de depunere numerar, pos-terminal pentru clienii cu carduri; de
overdraft pentru a acoperi decalajul n timp pentru plata facturilor, obligaiilor pe termen scurt; de creditare pentru investiii i capital permanent.
15
Reconsiderarea politicii de subvenionare a agriculturii prin aplicarea principiilor politicii agricole comune a UE. Fondul de subvenionare a productorilor
agricoli trebuie s fie gestionat de o singur instituie care s fie responsabil
de eficiena sistemului de subvenii n agricultur. Msurile de subvenionare
trebuie testate prin prisma analizei cost-beneficiu i s fie evaluate printrun sistem consistent de indicatori de performan. Acestea nu trebuie s
intervin n concurena de pia. Alocarea subveniilor trebuie transparentizat. Trebuie analizat practica UE de alocare a subveniilor n baza plilor
directe, evitnd indicatorii de producie. Msurile de subvenionare trebuie
prevzute pentru o perioad de cel puin 3-5 ani.
17
Capitolul 1
1.1.
Introducere
Sectorul IMM-lor din Republica Moldova s-a evideniat ca un fenomen de dezvoltare socio-economic a rii n contextul privatizrii n mas, s-a format i dezvoltat n condiiile economice nefavorabile i instabile ale perioadei de tranziie i astzi
devine din ce n ce mai important n ocuparea forei de munc, asigurarea pieei cu
bunuri i servicii, precum i participarea la formarea PIB-ului.
Conform celor mai recente date ale Biroului Naional de Statistic, sectorul IMM
n Moldova reprezint 97,5% din numrul total de ntreprinderi, numrul de angajai
din sector ajunge la 57,7% din totalul angajailor n economia naional.
Impactul cantitativ al IMM-urilor asupra creterii economice este estimat n dependen de ponderea de IMM-uri n PIB. n Republica Moldova, ponderea IMM-urilor n PIB este de 28,3%.
n UE, sectorul IMM-urilor genereaz 58,4% din PIB, n SUA - 43,4% (n 2009).
n 10 din cele 12 ri ale Organizaiei de Cooperare Economic la Marea Neagr
ponderea IMM-urilor n PIB este mai mic de 50%, iar n 5 ri - mai puin de 30%.
Criza economic global a afectat n msur diferit indicatorii de cretere a
anumitor grupuri de IMM-uri. De exemplu, creterea numrului de ntreprinderi n
sectorul IMM-urilor a avut loc, n special, din contul ntreprinderilor mici i micro.
n prezent, datele privind micro-ntreprinderile i micro-afacerile, care activeaz
fr nregistrare, nu sunt comparabile. Nu exist un registru consolidat care s analizeze activitatea tuturor ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii, precum i a titularilor de patente, care activeaz n ar. Drept consecin, n prezent, nu este posibil o analiz
aprofundat a dezvoltrii sectorului IMM-urilor.
Criza a avut un impact i asupra altor indicatori ce caracterizeaz dezvoltarea
socio-economic a rilor, afectnd n mod negativ dezvoltarea mediului de afaceri.
De aceea, adoptarea n 2012 a Strategiei de dezvoltare a sectorului IMM-urilor
18
1.2.
2007
18.85
10.88
2008
20.96
12.02
19
2009
20.31
12.51
2010
16.25
9.91
2011
14.37
8.75
2012
11.98
8.32
Criza financiar-economic a avut un impact negativ asupra indicatorilor de creditare a ntreprinderilor. n 2009, s-a redus drastic suma plilor ctre agenii economici
la credite i mprumuturi (Vezi Tabelul 2). n 2011, aceast cifr a crescut, ajungnd
la 91,8% din nivelul anului 2008.
belul 2. mprumuturile i creditele acordate de bncile comerciale agenilor
economici
2007
Valoarea mprumuturilor
i creditelor, milioane lei
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
n/a
2007
36,9
35,1
58,2
2008
36,5
45,0
73,9
2009
36,0
46,1
73,4
2010
33,3
45,4
62,4
2011
33,6
42,8
55,9
1.3.
Piaa de microcredite n Republica Moldova este reprezentat de ctre organizaiile de microfinanare i asociaiile de economii i mprumut care fac parte din
sectorul non-bancar.
Potrivit Comisiei Naionale a Pieei Financiare, n Republica Moldova sunt nregistrate cteva zeci de organizaii de microfinanare (la 31.12.2012 - 60 de organizaii), activele lor totale se ridic la 1 892,900,000 lei (sursa: http://www.cnpf.md/file/
Statistica_2013/aprilie/Indicatori-OMF_31.12.2012.xls).
20
Capitolul 1
1.4.
Fondul de Stat de Garantare a Creditelor (gestionat de Organizaia pentru Dezvoltarea Sectorului ntreprinderilor Mici i Mijlocii ODIMM), finanat din bugetul de
stat, ofer garanii de creditare pentru agenii economici care nu dispun de un gaj
suficient. Pentru ntreprinderile active mrimea garaniei va constitui maxim 50% din
suma creditului, dar nu va depi 1 milion de lei, perioada de creditare este de pn
la 5 ani, la 2% pe an din valoarea garaniei.
Pentru ntreprinderile nou create, mrimea garaniei va constitui maxim 70% din
suma creditului, dar nu va depi 500.000 lei. Perioada de creditare este de pn la
5 ani, la 1,5% pe an din valoarea garaniei.
Pentru ntreprinderile exportatoare, mrimea garaniei va constitui maxim 50%
din suma creditului pentru o perioad de pn la 5 ani la 1,5% pe an din valoarea
garaniei.
n prezent, portofoliul fondului este de 16,280,000 lei. Soldul de garanii active
este de 45 de garanii n valoare de 8,7 milioane de lei, ceea ce a permis acordarea
creditelor n valoare de 24,3 milioane de lei.
De asemenea, Fondul ofer garanii pentru ntreprinztorii participani la programele de stat PNAET i PARE1 +1, ODIMM.
Deci, pentru firmele participante n cadrul programului PNAET, mrimea garaniei este de pn la 50% din suma creditului, dar nu va depi 150. 000 lei, pentru
21
1.5.
1.6.
n prezent, pentru cele mai multe IMM-uri din ar problema accesului la finanare rmne una dintre cele mai acute. i, timp de aproape 15 ani, importana acestei
probleme este o prioritate, fapt confirmat de numeroase studii.
Sondajele ntreprinztorilor din Moldova (realizate n mod regulat de ctre Ministerul Economiei cu sprijinul Institutului de Economie, Finane i Statistic) arat
c problema accesului la finanare a fost i rmne pentru ei cea mai acut, att n
perioada premergtoare crizei (2007) ct i n ultimii ani (2011-2012).
De altfel, studiile IFES atest o cretere acestei probleme pentru ntreprinztori
22
Capitolul 1
Probleme
Accesul la resurse financiare
Lipsa personalului calificat
Echipamente, tehnologie
Materii prime i materiale consumabile
Imobil
Informaii
Altele
Niciuna
Sursa: IEFS
Principala dificultate pentru ntreprinztori, referitor la accesul la resurse financiare este rata mare a dobnzii la credite i costul ridicat al procedurii de obinere a
unui credit bancar. n plus, problema finanrii este legat de procedura de durat i
complicat de obinere a creditului i teama de a fi n incapacitate de rambursare a
mprumutului.
Astfel, cei mai muli dintre ntreprinztorii intervievai s-au confruntat cu problema
ratei dobnzii prea ridicate la credite, costul ridicat al procedurii de creditare (aceast
problem a fost menionat de ctre 82,8% din ntreprinztori). Peste o treime din
ntreprinztori (38,8%) au identificat drept o problem complexitatea procedurii de
obinere a mprumutului; 33,6% dintre ntreprinztorii intervievai sunt preocupai de
imposibilitatea de rambursare a mprumutului; pentru 31,3% o problema a fost lipsa
de gaj, aprecierea eronat a volumului gajurilor de ctre banc.
17,9% de ntreprinztori nu sper c vor avea succes n obinerea unui credit
sau investiii, n timp ce 11,2% nu au cunotine de ntocmire a unui business plan
sau de a face o prognoz a afacerilor. Pentru 10,4% din respondeni, problema este
lipsa capacitii de a atrage investiii n afaceri. n cele din urm, pentru 2.2% de
ntreprinztori, problema accesului limitat la finanare este asociat cu activitatea
parial a companiei n economia tenebr.
1.7.
Concluzii i recomandri
Cele mai multe dintre msurile menionate ntreprinse de stat, vizeaz mbuntirea accesului la finanare a anumitor grupuri nguste de ntreprinztori. n acelai
23
24
Capitolul
Capitolul1 2
Introducere
Rolul stimulator al investiiilor strine n economia unei ri este pe larg recunoscut n teoria economic i n practic: lanul de efecte pe care le genereaz investiiile strine se rsfrng att asupra produciei de bunuri i servicii, ct i asupra
consumului, motivnd simultan cererea i oferta. Investiiile reprezint stimulentul ce
genereaz noi activiti economice i are ca finalitate obinerea de bunuri i servicii
indispensabile unei economii viabile. Mobilizarea resurselor investiionale este unul
din elementele din ecuaia economic care favorizeaz atingerea obiectivelor strategice de dezvoltare a oricrei ri. Acest proces contribuie att la creterea nivelului
produciei, ameliorarea complex a economiei naionale, soluionarea problemelor
ce in de retehnologizarea ntreprinderilor, dar i la dezvoltarea durabil a unor sectoare ale economiei, inclusiv cel al IMM, regiuni (localiti), implicit la soluionarea
problemelor sociale. Astfel, investiiile strine au potenialul de a aduce beneficii considerabile rilor beneficiare, de succesul n atragerea lor depinde creterea economic i modernizarea economiei. ns, aceste beneficii nu vin n mod automat. Toate
rile au realizat importana investiiilor strine pentru dezvoltarea economiilor i societilor lor. Acestea s-au angajat cu adevrat ntr-o competiie internaional pentru
atragerea investiiilor strine. Cu att mai mult, cu ct atractivitatea unei ri pentru
investiiile strine se bazeaz din ce n ce mai puin pe avantajele comparative ale
rilor (resurse naturale i de producie), un rol tot mai mare avnd aa-numitele
avantaje competitive (dotarea cu factori de vrf-for de munc calificat, tehnologii
i servicii de extensiune, mediul concurenial intern, caracteristicile cererii interne,
legturile pe orizontal dintre ramuri i prezena unor clustere puternice, politicile
guvernamentale, etc.) n condiiile Republicii Moldova, cnd posibilitile interne ale
agenilor economici locali sunt limitate i insuficiente pentru a relansa economia, se
impune necesitatea abordrii unor politici corecte pentru crearea unui mediu propice
i stimulator atragerii capitalului strin, n special n sectorul IMM, ca cel mai reprezentativ sector al economiei. Astfel, n perioada actual a globalizrii, a liberalizrii
fluxurilor comerciale i a intensificrii competiiei pentru atragerea investiiilor strine,
n special n rile n tranziie i n curs de dezvoltare, sunt extrem de utile cercetrile
care ajut la nelegerea aspectelor i problematicii pe care le implic procesul de
atragere a investiiilor strine.
n capitolul de fa ne-am propus s investigm fenomenul de atragere a investiiilor strine ca un factor hotrtor al relansrii economiei, avnd la baz impulsionarea investiiilor strine n sectorul IMM. Acest lucru este cu att mai important,
cu ct sectorul IMM-urilor din Republica Moldova are un rol de baz n dezvoltarea economic i social a rii, deinnd 97.5% din numrul total al ntreprinderilor,
25
angajnd 57,7% din numrul total al salariailor, avnd o cot de 34,5% din venitul total din vnzri pe economie i contribuind cu 28,3% la PIB-ul total al rii. Cercetrile
capitolului de fa au pornit de la discuiile celui de-al IV-lea Forum Moldo-German
privind finanarea IMM, tema respectiv constituind subiectul unuia dintre panelele
de discuii din cadrul acestui eveniment, cu participarea reprezentanilor IMM-urilor,
preponderent din Gguzia i regiunea de sud a Republicii Moldova. ns, analizele
nu se rezum doar la concluziile discuiilor, ci abordeaz un spectru mai larg, ncepnd cu noiunea de investiie strin i motivaiile rilor, n special a celor n tranziie, din categoria crora face parte i Republica Moldova, n atragerea investiiilor
strine, aa cum aceasta este reflectat n literatura de specialitate (subcapitolul
2), urmat de prezentarea evoluiilor fluxurilor de investiii strine i a tendinelor lor
la nivel mondial i regional (subcapitolul 3), evoluia fluxurilor de investiii strine n
economia Moldovei sub diferite aspecte, evoluia investiiilor strine n sectorul IMM
i a modului n care acestea au influenat pn n prezent structura economiei i
dezvoltarea acesteia (subcapitolul 4), abordri referitoare la climatul investiional din
Republica Moldova, ca factor decisiv al atractivitii investiionale a rii (subcapitolul
5), finaliznd cu concluzii i recomandri, att pe baza analizelor prezentate n acest
capitol, ct i pe baza discuiilor din cadrul panelului Oportuniti de atragere a investiiilor strine n sectorul IMM, din cadrul celui de-al IV-lea Forum Moldo-German
privind finanarea IMM (subcapitolul 6).
2.2.
1
2
3
26
Capitolul 2
27
Tipuri de ISD
ISD de valorificare a
resurselor
ISD de valorificare a
pieelor
ISD de valorificare a
activelor strategice
ISD de eficien
Motivaii primare
accesul la resurse naturale (resurse minerale, materii prime,
produse agricole);
accesul la resursele umane ieftine sau specializate.
ISD pe piee, deservite anterior de exporturi, sau pe piee
protejate de taxe nalte de import ori alte bariere
ISD fcute de ctre companiile furnizoare, care-i urmeaz
clienii peste hotare
ISD care caut s-i adapteze produsele la necesitile i
preferinele locale i s utilizeze resurse locale
achiziii i aliane care urmresc atingerea obiectivelor
corporative pe termen lung
raionalizarea sau integrarea operaiunilor (n aspect
regional/global) care s conduc la specializarea
transfrontalier sau pe produs
Fluxurile de ISD joac un rol din ce n ce mai important n economia contemporan. Acestea, alturi de capitalul autohton, particip direct la procesul de dezvoltare
a economiilor naionale i contribuie considerabil la sporirea competitivitii economiilor. Cu toate acestea, nici fluxurile de ISD, i nici beneficiile de pe urma acestora nu
vin n mod automat. Odat cu realizarea tot mai mare de ctre toate rile a importanei ISD, acestea acord o atenie tot mai mare politicilor care pot spori beneficiile
unor astfel de investiii asupra dezvoltrii rilor lor6. n cazul rilor mici, cu capaciti
locale limitate (cum este cazul Republicii Moldova), orice proces de dezvoltare este
sortit s fie mult mai dependent de ISD, dect n cazul altor ri7. Existena unui impact pozitiv al investiiilor strine directe asupra bunstrii i creterii competitivitii
rilor receptoare este pe deplin recunoscut. Republica Moldova, ca de altfel toate
statele n tranziie, are o serie de motivaii obiective i subiective ce stau la baza
interesului fa de investiii, n special fa de cele strine directe:
5
Anghel E. Ion Probleme economice. Investiii strine directe, modernizarea i nzestrarea cu factori,
Centrul de Informare i Documentare Economic, Bucureti, 2002
Foreign direct investment and performance requirements: new evidence from selected countries, UNCTAD, 2003
Sinjaya Lall Reinventing Industrial Strategy: The Role of Government Policy in Building Industrial Competitiveness, G-24 Discussion Paper Series, No. 28, April 2004, UNCTAD
28
Capitolul 2
Accesul la piaa occidental, cu exigenele sale nalte, constituie, de asemenea, o motivaie serioas n atragerea de investiii, n special strine. Produsele obinute n cadrul unor participri strine au acces mai facil pe pieele
externe, mai ales dac acestea se altur propriilor realizri ale investitorului
strin n ara de origine. n multe cazuri, rezultatele unor astfel de investiii se
pot bucura chiar de anumite faciliti la intrarea pe pieele altor state, faciliti
ce pot viza diferite forme de autorizri, omologri, asimilri etc., precum i
faciliti de ordin vamal, fiscal sau de alt natur8.
2.3.
Rodica Hncu, Denis Jelimalai, Greta Ofrim Investiiile strine directe component important a fluxurilor economice internaionale, revista Economica, nr. 1 (71), 2010
Ioan Denu Investiiile strine directe, Editura Economic, Bucureti, 1998
29
2007
1975,5
Total
rile dezvoltate
1310,4
rile n curs de dezvoltare
574,3
Economiile n tranziie
90,8
Europa de sud-est
14,3
rile CSI
76,5
% din fluxul ISD la nivel mondial
rile dezvoltate
66,3
rile n curs de dezvoltare
29,1
Economiile n tranziie
4,6
Europa de sud-est
0,7
rile CSI
3,9
50,6
43,3
6,0
0,7
5,3
47,3
47,1
5,6
0,4
5,3
49,1
44,9
6,0
0,5
5,5
2012
1310,7
548,9
680,4
81,5
3,5
78,0
41,9
51,9
6,2
0,3
6,0
Sursa: World Investment Report 2012 i Global Investment Trends Monitor, no. 11,
2013, UNCTAD
O evoluie remarcabil n fluxurile ISD la nivel mondial n anul 2012 a constituit-o faptul c pentru prima dat rile n curs de dezvoltare au atras mai multe
ISD (51, 9%) dect rile dezvoltate (41,9%), restul de 6,2% avnd ca destinaie
rile n tranziie din Europa de sud-est i rile CSI (tabelul 2). Acest moment poate
10
11
12
13
30
Capitolul 2
31
% investiiilor
Sectorul
Industria
Sectorul
Industria
Serviciile
Serviciile
primar prelucrtoare
primar prelucrtoare
Media anilor
2005-2007
130
670
820
41
50
2008
230
980
1130
10
42
48
2009
170
510
630
13
39
48
2010
140
620
490
11
50
39
2011
200
660
570
14
46
40
Analiza evoluiilor fluxurilor mondiale de ISD demonstreaz c odat cu intensificarea procesului de globalizare, dar i ca urmare a crizelor structurale din zona
UE i SUA, au crescut ansele rilor n curs de dezvoltare i a celor n tranziie s
beneficieze de un influx mai mare de ISD. Cu toate acestea, evidenele arat c n
majoritatea lor, companiile strine sunt interesate s investeasc doar ntr-un numr limitat din rndul acestor ri, numite i ri din grupul de baz. Acestea sunt
rile care ntrunesc cele mai bune condiii pentru ISD. Cea mai mare parte a ISD
care merge ctre rile din afara grupului de baz sunt investiii de ni, atrase
de anumite caracteristici specifice ale rii de destinaie i, n mod normal, nu ar fi
mers n oricare alt ar. Implicaia acestor evidene pentru rile din afara grupului
de baz, care doresc s dezvolte politici atractive pentru ISD, inclusiv R. Moldova,
este s evite competiia pe termen scurt, cu utilizarea vacanelor fiscale sau altor
stimulente, n schimb s se concentreze pe dezvoltarea condiiilor pe care le ntrunesc rile grupului de baz: stabilitate politic i economic, cadru legal, regulator
i de proceduri stimulator, un mediu facilitator pentru exporturi care s compenseze
dimensiunile reduse ale pieei locale, o for de munc mai bine educat i furnizori
locali de servicii de infrastructur, de business i input-uri materiale mai puternice i
mai eficiente15.
n figura ce urmeaz vom reprezenta schematic zona de concuren a RM n cadrul fluxurilor mondiale de ISD conform evoluiilor din ultimii 5 ani. Deoarece aceasta
este o schem general i nu una concret pentru o investiie anume, vom face abstracie de existena unor ri n lista de baz, considernd concureni direci toate
rile din regiune.
15
Charles-Albert Michalet Strategies of Multinationals and Competition for FDI, the IFC and the World
Bank, 1997
32
Capitolul 2
rile industrial
dezvoltate (549 mlrd. $)
Cretere 42%
rile n curs de
dezvoltare (680 mlrd. $)
Cretere 118%
Economiile n tranziie
(82 mlrd. $)
Cretere 90%
rile Europei de
Sud-Est (3,5 mlrd. $)
Cretere 24%
Zona de concuren a RM
(3,578 mlrd. $)
Cretere 24102%
rile CSI
(78 mlrd. $)
Cretere 102%
Sursa: Elaborat de autor n baza datelor WIR 2012 i Global Investment Trends
Monitor, no. 11, 2013, UNCTAD
2.4.
Din pcate, R. Moldova nu se numr printre marii ctigtori ai fluxurilor crescnde de ISD din ultimii 20 de ani. Pornind n anul 1992 practic de la acelai nivel
cu celelalte ri n tranziie (ba chiar cu un avantaj dublu fa de acestea, cu 4 $ per
capita stoc de ISD, fa de doar 2 $ media rilor n tranziie), ctre anul 2011 Moldova a devenit una din codaele Europei i a rilor n tranziie n atragerea ISD. Astfel,
n anul 2011 stocul per capita de ISD n Moldova era de doar 892 $ - de 2,8 ori mai
puin dect media rilor n tranziie, de 3,3 ori mai puin dect media mondial i de
14,2 ori mai puin dect media rilor dezvoltate.
33
Moldova
Sursa: UNCTAD
34
Capitolul 2
ara
Fluxul
Fluxul
ISD de ISD de
intrare intrare
n 2010, n 2011,
mil. $
mil. $
Stocul
de
ISD n
2011,
mil. $
Valoarea
Nr. de
Valoarea
Nr. de
proiecproiec- proiectelor proiecte
telor
te gre- greenfield greengreenfield
enfield,
n 2010,
field n
n 2011,
2010
mil. $
2011
mil. $
197
274
3 163
13
301
12
320
Georgia
814
975
9,305
31
1 017
30
1 991
Macedonia
211
422
4 728
14
470
25
956
1 051
1 031
4 701
68
488
Muntenegru
760
558
5 803
10
380
436
Armenia
570
525
5 046
265
21
805
Albania
526
2 143
51 293
102
4 242
91
5 676
Estonia
1 540
257
16 727
27
947
29
883
Letonia
379
1 562
12 109
23
965
20
717
17
Impactul investiiilor strine directe asupra economiei Republicii Moldova, Expert-Grup, Chiinu,
2010
35
ISD n PIB, %
Un rol important n atragerea ISD n Moldova pare s-l fi avut aderarea n 2007
a Romniei la UE, urmat de relocarea unor afaceri europene din Romnia n Moldova, unde condiiile fiscale i costurile muncii erau vzute ca fiind mai atractive.
ISD au crescut cu un ritm rapid n 2007, care a continuat i n 2008, n contextul
introducerii cotei zero la impozitul pentru venitul reinvestit i a creterii economice
n ritmuri susinute. Totui, cota zero la impozitul reinvestit nu este unicul factor care
a atras investitorii strini i nici nu pare s fi fost cel mai important. Astfel, n 2008
ISD au continuat s creasc, ns aceast cretere s-a datorat mai mult majorrii
investiiilor n capitalul social i nu venitului reinvestit care, dimpotriv, s-a redus fa
de anul 2007.
Tabelul 5: Evoluia fluxului ISD n economia Moldovei pe tipuri de capital
investit, mil. $
ISD n economia
naional
Capital social
Venit reinvestit
mprumuturi intra-grup
2000
2001
2002
2003
129,49
84,99
100,31
106,23
87,56
56,41
-2,6
47,1
-36,64
30,72
-27,43
58,58
15,34
20,41
2008
2009
2007
2010
2004
46,42
-22,83
2011
2005
39,33
71,63
2012
36
2006
41,59
100,16
Capitolul 2
mprumuturile intra-grup,
stoc la sfrit
de perioad
3 500,0
3 000,0
2 500,0
Capital social i
venit reinvestit,
stoc la sfrit
de perioad
2 000,0
1 500,0
1 000,0
500,0
0,0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Sursa: BNM
Ponderea cea mai mare n stocul ISD acumulate n capitalul social la sfritul
anului 2012 (52.7%) a revenit investitorilor din rile UE. Conform datelor BNM, circa un sfert din investiiile UE n R. Moldova provin din Olanda i Cipru, companiile
investitoare din aceste ri fiind n majoritate de tip SPE (Special Purpose Entity
entitate cu destinaie special), utilizate ca intermediari de proprietarii adevrai.
Proveniena investiiilor n proporie de peste 25% din Olanda i Cipru denatureaz
ntr-o anumit msur analiza investiiilor pe ri de origine, deoarece n spatele
capitalului din Olanda i Cipru de multe ori se afl investitori din Rusia, R. Moldova
sau alte ri. Investitorilor din CSI le-au revenit 11.6% din stocul investiiilor strine
directe n capitalul social, iar investitorilor din alte ri 35.7%19. Pe ri individuale,
18
19
Balana de pli a Republicii Moldova pentru anul 2012, BNM, 28 martie 2013
Balana de pli a Republicii Moldova pentru anul 2012, BNM, 28 martie 2013
37
cei mai mari investitori n Moldova sunt companiile din Rusia, cu peste 190 mil. $,
dar investiiile reale provenind de la investitorii rui ar putea fi mai nalte din contul
investiiilor care figureaz ca fiind din Olanda sau Cipru. Urmeaz investiiile din
Olanda, cu ceva mai mult de 150 mil. USD, SUA cca. 145 mil. $, Cipru i Germania, cu cca. 140 mil. $ fiecare.
Cele mai multe din investiiile strine directe sunt concentrate n activitile de
intermediere financiar, n special n bnci. Mai mult ca att, se atest o cretere
a ponderii acestui sector n structura ISD. Astfel, dac n anul 2008 acesta deinea
19,8% din totalul stocului de ISD, ctre anul 2012 ponderea sa a crescut pn la
27,7%, sau mai mult de din toate ISD n RM. Acest lucru dovedete c piaa
ISD din Moldova este dominat de investiiile de valorificare a pieelor, aparinnd
unor grupuri financiare cu reele extinse n mai multe ri (Groupe Socit Generale,
Gruppo Veneto Banca, Erste Bank, Pro Credit, Raiffeisen, etc.). Urmtorul sector ca
interes pentru investitori strini este industria prelucrtoare, ponderea acesteia n
stocul ISD crescnd n ultimii 4 ani de la 19,1% pn la 23,5%. Printre cei mai mari
investitori n acest sector se numr Lafarge (producerea cimentului), Knauf (materiale de construcie, Sudzuker (producerea zahrului), Draexlmaier i Lear Corporation (industria componentelor i accesoriilor automobilistice), Lactalis Group i Efes
(industria alimentar i a buturilor), etc. Se pare c motivul principal al investiiilor companiilor respective n acest sector este exploatarea costurilor locale reduse
(n special fora de munc), precum i a resurselor locale (n industria materialelor
de construcie i prelucrarea materiei prime agricole), dar i piaa local (industria
alimentar i a buturilor). Ponderea comerului cu ridicata i amnuntul n totalul
stocului de ISD s-a redus de la 23,3% n 2008 pn la 16,8% n 2012. Principalii
investitori n acest sector sunt grupurile Metro, Lukoil, Mabanaft, Petrom, Rompetrol,
etc. Evident, aceti investitori sunt interesai n primul rnd de piaa local, ns criza
economic i epuizarea boom-ului consumului din anii 2007-2008 a mai temperat
ritmul investiiilor n acest sector. Cu toate acestea, se observ o predilecie a investitorilor strini pentru sectoarele de bunuri necomercializabile (non-tradable), cu rate
nalte ale recuperrii investiiilor, ns fr un impact major asupra competitivitii
economiei RM (cca. 75% din stocul total de ISD). De asemenea, majoritatea ISD
n R. Moldova aparin unor companii mari. Sectorul real productiv al economiei i al
IMM se bucur mai puin de efectele investiiilor strine, de unde i competitivitatea
joas a acestor sectoare i a produselor autohtone, ritmurilor de cretere net superioare ale importurilor comparativ cu exporturile. Conform unor autori, Investiiile
strine din R. Moldova au exploatat pn n prezent nite situaii de monopol, care
le-a permis s obin profituri nalte datorit preurilor i tarifelor ridicate la serviciile
prestate. Aceasta se refer la asemenea investitori importani din economia rii,
cum sunt Gazprom (pachetul de control n Moldova-Gaz), Gas Natural Fenosa,
Orange, Moldcell, Lafarge, supermarketurile din comerul angro20.
Totui, fluxul crescnd de ISD ncepnd cu anul 2004 a condus la majorarea
numrului de IMM cu capital mixt i a celor cu capital strin, dei ntr-un ritm mai
20
Dumitru Moldovanu Investiiile strine directe i comerul exterior principalele instrumente ale respecializrii internaionale a economiei moldoveneti, Economica, nr. 4 (60) 2007
38
Capitolul 2
39
nivelul ntregii economii, companiile cu capital local i-au sporit vnzrile cu 75%,
n timp ce veniturile din vnzri ale IMM-urilor cu capital mixt s-au redus n aceeai
perioad cu 10%, iar companiile cu capital mixt la nivelul ntregii economii i-au
sporit vnzrile cu 49%). Cifrele respective demonstreaz c, n general, companiile
cu capital strin au o dinamic a creterii mult mai nalt dect companiile locale.
Cu toate acestea, dinamica pozitiv este mai accentuat n cazul companiilor mari,
ceea ce demonstreaz faptul c n comparaie cu businessul mare, sectorul IMM n
R. Moldova este mai puin atractiv pentru investiiile strine. ns i la nivelul ntregii
economii, n comparaie cu alte ri, numrul total al companiilor cu capital strin este
nc destul de mic. Astfel, dac n Ungaria 35% din numrul total al companiilor au
n componena capital strin21, apoi n Moldova aceast cifr constituie 8,8% (4,1%
companiile cu capital integral strin i 4,7% cele cu capital mixt). La posibilele cauze
ale acestei situaii ne vom referi mai pe larg n compartimentul urmtor.
Tabelul 6: Evoluia numrului de companii, a numrului de angajai i a venitului
din vnzri pe forme de proprietate n economie, anul 2011 vs. 2006
Total pe
forme de
proprietate
Proprietate
local
Proprietate
strina
ntreprinderi mixte
2011
2006
2011
2006
2011
Creterea, %
2006
Numrul de salariai ai
IMM
Creterea, %
Companiile dup
forma de
proprietate
Creterea, %
Numrul total de
IMM
Creterea la nivelul
ntregii economii
2011 vs. 2006, %
NuNumr
Venit
mr
de
din
de
comvnsalapazri
riai
nii
35.542 47.337
33
332.720 294.184
-12
54.281 71.888
32
34
-11
77
32.889 43.570
32
305.631 267.697
-12
47.200 64.391
36
33
-16
75
1.174
1.856
58
11.614
13.643
17
2.878
3.710
29
65
56
138
1.479
1.911
29
15.475
12.844
-17
4.203
3.787
-10
32
49
Constantin Doltu Investiiile strine directe i influena lor asupra modernizrii economiei n tranziie,
tez de doctor n economie, ASEM, Chiinu, 2007
40
Capitolul 2
mitate (att sub form de capital local disponibil, ct i ca companii locale potrivite
pentru fuziunile cu investitorii strini). La fel, i n privina numrului de angajai, IMMurile cu capital strin i-au sporit ponderea de la 2,0% pn la 2,7%, n timp ce cele
cu capital mixt au sczut puin ca pondere de la 2,7% la 2,5%. La capitolul contribuie
la veniturile totale din vnzri, ns, IMM-urile cu capital strin i-au redus ponderea
de la 2,5% pn la 1,8%, iar cele mixte de la 3,6% pn la 1,8%. Acesta poate fi rezultatul att a influenei crizei economice regionale care a afectat IMM-urile mai mult
dect companiile mari, ct i a diminurii atractivitii investiionale a rii, aspect la
care ne vom referi n continuarea capitolului. Pare s fie vorba, ns, mai degrab
de efectele crizei, pentru c i companiile locale au sczut ca pondere n vnzri
n aceeai perioad de la 40,2% pn la 31,0%. Faptul c IMM-urile sunt mult mai
vulnerabile la evoluiile negative ale conjuncturii economice, manifestate sub forma
crizelor, este demonstrat i de ponderea destul de redus a profiturilor pn la impozitare ale IMM n profiturile totale pe economie. Astfel, per total, IMM dein cca. 36%
din profituri, restul aparinnd businessului mare. Ponderea profiturilor IMM-urilor
cu capital strin a fost n medie de 1,2% n perioada 2006-2011, iar a celor cu capital mixt respectiv de 1,9%. Aceasta este cu mult mai puin dect ponderea altor
indicatori ai acelorai IMM, ceea ce explic parial, neatractivitatea acestui sector
pentru investiiile strine: nivelul de rentabilitate al acestui sector este destul de mic
n comparaie cu cel al businessului mare. Astfel, conform datelor BNS, n anul 2011,
ntreprinderile mari cu capital strin deineau cca. 13% din totalul profitului pn la
impozitare pe economie, iar cele mari cu capital mixt 17%.
Tabelul 7: Evoluia unor indicatori ai IMM pe forme de proprietate, 2011 vs. 2006
IMM dup
forma de
proprietate
Total pe
forme de
proprietate
Proprietate
local
Proprietate
strin
ntreprinderi
mixte
Media
Media
2006 2011 2006- 2006 2011 20062011
2011
Media
2006 2011 20062011
Ponderea n
rezultatul financiar
total pn la
impozitare, %
Media
2006 2011 20062011
98,3
97,5
97,9
57,9
57,7
58,4
46,2
34,6
39,8
35,2
35,9
36,5
91,0
89,8
90,3
53,2
52,5
53,3
40,2
31,0
35,4
32,1
32,7
33,4
3,2
3,8
3,6
2,0
2,7
2,5
2,5
1,8
2,1
0,2
2,0
1,2
4,1
3,9
4,0
2,7
2,5
2,6
3,6
1,8
2,4
3,0
1,3
1,9
Ponderea n
nr. total de
ntreprinderi, %
Ponderea n
Ponderea n nr. total
veniturile totale din
de salariai, %
vnzri, %
41
Ponderea n stocul de
ISD
2008
2008
2010
2011
2010
2011
Total
Chiinu
Regiunea
Nord
Bli
Regiunea
Centru
Regiunea
Sud
UTA
Gguzia
84,5%
84,3%
86,3%
86,2%
86,8%
145
178
196
4,7%
4,9%
5,1%
4,0%
5,4%
5,3%
67
88
106
2,2%
2,4%
2,7%
1,7%
3,1%
2,7%
222
259
273
7,2%
7,1%
7,0%
5,7%
6,2%
5,8%
66
73
79
2,1%
2,0%
2,0%
3,0%
1,0%
1,1%
45
55
59
1,5%
1,5%
1,5%
1,0%
1,2%
1,0%
Sursa: BNS
42
Capitolul 2
43
2.5.
Dup cum am menionat deja, ceva mai sus, datorit avantajelor incontestabile
pe care le posed ISD, toate rile lumii, dar n special cele mai puin dezvoltate,
n ultimele decenii s-au vzut nevoite s recurg la o nou form de concuren
ntre ele, i anume, s se ntreac n crearea celor mai favorabile condiii pentru
atragerea capitalului strin sau a unui climat investiional ct mai atractiv. Climatul
investiional este definit, n general, ca un sistem de factori i premise economice,
politice, instituionale i de drept, capabile s intervin n procesul de realizare investiional, modificnd comportamentul investiional spre stimulare sau de-stimulare i
reflectnd nivelul de atractivitate al unei ri (ramuri, zone, regiuni) pentru alocarea
investiiilor, avnd tangen cu toate domeniile economiei22. Pe parcursul anilor, n
climatul investiional al RM au avut loc mai multe schimbri pozitive, elementele cele
mai atractive ale acestuia fiind:
Presiunea fiscal redus (una dintre cele mai mici din Europa);
Stabilitatea macroeconomic (stabilitatea relativ a valutei naionale i
rata relativ redus a inflaiei, deficitul bugetar i ponderea datoriilor de
stat n PIB n limitele valorilor moderate, creterea economic nregistrat n ultimul deceniu);
Amplasarea geografic strategic a rii, solul, clima favorabil, existena
tradiiilor n industria prelucrtoare, n special n cea a produselor agroalimentare;
Fora de munc relativ ieftin i calificat;
Existena unor acorduri de comer i de liber schimb la nivel mondial i regional, ceea ce face ca limitrile legate dimensiunea mic a pieei interne
s fie n mare parte eliminate.
Cu toate acestea, n comparaie cu alte ri din regiune, climatul investiional
nu este un atu pentru R. Moldova. Despre aceasta vorbesc att poziia Moldovei n
rating-urile internaionale ct i comparaia direct performanelor privind atragerea
ISD dintre ri. Dup cum am vzut n compartimentele anterioare, Moldova se poziioneaz pe ultimul loc n Europa la indicatorii de atragere a ISD. n timp ce factorii
legai de mrimea pieei sunt aceiai ca n multe ri de comparaie la care ne-am
referit, iar factorul uman, n pofida deteriorrii din ultimul timp a calitii acestuia,
rmne totui, mai degrab un element de atracie, diferena, n opinia noastr, este
dat de factorii legai de cadrul politic i economic, precum i de capabilitile locale
pe care ara poate s-o pun la dispoziia investitorilor.
Astfel, reticena investitorilor strini de a investiii n economia RM este explicat
i de ali autori prin instabilitatea politic i lipsa condiiilor favorabile pentru realizarea activitii de business23. Alii, indic concret asupra problemelor care afecteaz
22
23
Inga Fonea Impactul crizei financiare mondiale asupra climatului investiional din Republica Moldova,
revista Economica nr. 2 (66) 2009
Galina Ulian Atragerea investiiilor strine directe n domeniul businessului mic, revista Economie i
Finane, nr. 5, 2001
44
Capitolul 2
25
Grigore Belostecinic Competitivitatea economic i promovarea investiiilor strine orientate spre export
o provocare pentru economia Republicii Moldova, revista Intelectus, nr. 3, 2006
Cartea Alb: Propuneri pentru mbuntirea climatului investiional n Moldova, Asocia Investitorilor
Strini din RM (FIA), 2009
45
Facilitarea comerului prin eliminarea barierelor administrative i a practicilor de monopol n derularea operaiunilor de import-export i recunoaterea certificatelor eliberate de rile membre ale UE pe teritoriul RM;
ntrirea securitii energetice a R. Moldova.
Concluzii indirecte referitoare la atractivitatea climatului investiional pentru investitorii strini putem face i pe baza analizei unor indicatori relativi, cum ar fi evoluia investiiilor n capital fix, n comparaie cu cea a ISD (tabelul 9). Analiznd datele
din tabelul respectiv, se poate observa c creterea ISD, practic, nu alimenteaz
majorarea investiiilor n capitalul fix, ceea ce nseamn c investiiile n capitalul fix
se realizeaz n cea mai mare parte din surse locale. Cauzele acestui fenomen se
regsesc n mare parte, dup prerea noastr, n climatul investiional insuficient
de atractiv, care nu ofer siguran pe termen lung investitorilor strini. Astfel, se
poate constata, dup cum am vzut i n analiza repartiiei pe sectoare a stocului
de ISD, c o parte important a ISD este orientat spre sectoarele neproductive ale
economiei, care nu necesit investiii mari n capital fix i au perioade mai mici de
recuperare.
Tabelul 9: Evoluia comparativ a ratei de cretere a investiiilor n capital fix
i ISD
Indicatorii
Creterea investiiilor n
capital fix, %
Creterea ISD nete, %
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
8,0
21,0
24,0
21,9
2,3
-33,5
22,6
11,8
97,3
30,8
35,1
109,7
31,4
-79,6
35,9
39,1
27
Natalia Bncil Investiiile strine factor relevant al creterii economice, Conferina tiinific internaional Rolul investiiilor n dezvoltarea durabil a economiei naionale n contextul integrrii europene,
29-30 octombrie 2010
Ion Prachi Climatul investiional surs de cretere i reducere a srciei n Republica Moldova, Romnia i Republica Moldova. Potenialul competitiv al economiilor naionale: Posibiliti de valorificare
pe piaa intern, european i mondial, Academia Romn, Bucureti, 2004
46
Capitolul 2
Economia
Albania
Armenia
Belarus
Cipru
Estonia
Georgia
Letonia
Moldova
Slovenia
Macedonia
Atractivitatea pieei
133
118
34
113
29
74
55
109
97
114
Sursa: Web table 32a: Country rankings by Inward FDI Potential Index, 2011, UNC
TAD
Conform ultimului Sondaj al ntreprinderilor, realizat de Banca Mondial (Enterprise Surveys 2009), cele mai mari 3 obstacole n derularea afacerilor n Moldova
sunt accesul la finanare, calificarea joas a forei de munc i accesul la terenuri30.
Un alt indice important, ce caracterizeaz atractivitatea economiei unei ri pentru
investitori este indicele libertii economice, calculat de ctre Heritage Foundation.
28
29
30
Astrtit Sulstarova FDI performance and potential rankings, Division on Investment and Enterprise,
UNCTAD
Web table 32a: Country rankings by Inward FDI Potential Index, 2011, UNCTAD
http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/Data/ExploreEconomies/2009/moldova
47
Potrivit acestuia, n anul 2013 Moldova se situa pe poziia 115 din 185 de ri, fiind
plasat n categoria rilor preponderent nelibere. n acelai clasament Macedonia
se situa pe poziia 43, Armenia pe locul 38, iar Albania pe locul 58. n ceea ce privete libertatea investiional, Moldova mprea locurile 129-141 mpreun cu alte
12 state, n timp ce Armenia i Georgia locurile 27-36, Albania 56-73, Macedonia
74-80, Letonia pe locurile 17-26, iar Estonia se situa pe poziiile 2-931. n alt clasament internaional, Doing Business 2013, elaborat de Banca Mondial, Moldova s-a
clasat pe locul 83 din 185 de ri dup uurina derulrii afacerilor, inclusiv pe locul
82 la protecia investitorilor. rile, pe care le-am utilizat pentru comparaie au avut o
poziionare mai bun: Georgia locul 9 (19 la protecia investitorilor); Macedonia locul
23 (19 la protecia investitorilor); Armenia locul 32 (25 la protecia investitorilor); Albania locul 85 (17 la protecia investitorilor). n pofida unui anumit grad de subiectivism
al acestor rating-uri, investitorii de obicei in cont de ele n procesul de selectare a locaiilor pentru investiii. Ca rezultat, rile cu o plasare mai bun n aceste clasamente (i, ca urmare, cu un climat investiional i de afaceri mai bun), au i o performan
mai bun n atragerea ISD, n pofida faptului c dup potenialul teoretic de atragere
Tabelul 11: Performana unor ri n atragerea ISD n comparaie cu locul
deinut n rating-urile internaionale
Economia
Albania
Armenia
Belarus
Cipru
Estonia
Georgia
Letonia
Moldova
Slovenia
Macedonia
Indicatorii
Potenialul
Poziia n
Poziia
de atragere a Doing Business
n Doing
ISD (locul)
la uurina
Business la
conform
derulrii
protecia
UNCTAD
afacerilor
investitorilor
123
85
17
136
32
25
27
58
82
129
36
32
75
21
70
104
9
19
80
25
70
122
83
82
81
35
17
130
23
19
Poziia
conform
Stocul ISD
indicelui
per capita in
libertii
2011, $
economice
58
1462
38
1628
153
1359
41
20384
13
16437
21
2149
55
5398
115
892
76
7442
43
2291
a ISD au o poziie mai proast (Armenia, Macedonia, Albania). Tabelul de mai jos
demonstreaz acest lucru. Moldova ocup cea mai proast clasare n rating-urile
de referin printre rile de comparaie, respectiv i performanele ei, msurate ca
31
http://www.heritage.org/index/
48
Capitolul 2
stocul de ISD per capita, sunt cele mai slabe, urmat de Belarus, Albania, Armenia,
Macedonia i Georgia. mbuntirea performanei n cadrul acestor clasamente ar
trebui s fac parte din eforturile politicii de atragere a ISD. Iar acest lucru nu este
posibil fr mbuntirea climatului investiional i de afaceri.
Importana climatului de afaceri pentru succesul unei ri n atragerea ISD este
menionat i de numeroasele organizaii specializate, care elaboreaz analize comparative ale condiiilor de atragere a ISD din diferite ri. Astfel, Serviciul de Consultan pentru Climatul Investiional din cadrul Bncii Mondiale (Investment Climate
Advisory Services) n cuvntul de introducere al raportului su pentru anul 2010,
menioneaz c factorii care influeneaz deciziile de investiii ale companiilor strine
se schimb. n cutarea unor oportuniti de afaceri, acestea sunt acum mult mai
ngrijorate de riscurile financiare i politice, dnd prioritate mediilor de afaceri stabile
i previzibile. Ca rspuns, guvernele de pretutindeni recunosc c ansele lor de a
atrage mai multe investiii strine depind de reuitele n crearea unor climate investiionale mai competitive32.
Importana crerii unui mediu de afaceri favorabil pentru activitatea investiional, stimularea fluxului de investiii n ar i contribuia la creterea potenialului de
export, pe baza experienei unor ri est europene (rile baltice, Cehia, Slovenia)
este menionat i n Strategia de atragere a investiiilor i promovare a exporturilor
pentru anii 2006-2015, care recunoate nivelul insuficient al investiiilor, n special
ale celor strine directe, n sectorul real al economiei. De asemenea, se recunoate
c activitatea investiional restrns a agenilor economici se datoreaz nu doar
resurselor financiare limitate, ci i diferitelor impedimente de ordin administrativ la
faza de aplicare a legislaiei, care au impact negativ asupra lansrii i dezvoltrii activitilor respective33. mbuntirea mediului de afaceri, conform Strategiei, trebuie
s serveasc drept baz pentru sporirea investiiilor private, n special a celor strine
directe. Iar n acest scop, Guvernul i propune s continue implementarea reformelor privind mbuntirea mediului investiional prin intermediul reformei regulatorii, n
special al simplificrii procedurilor de nregistrare, liceniere, autorizare, control i raportare a ntreprinderilor n procesul lansrii i dezvoltrii afacerilor, revizuirii actelor
legislative ce reglementeaz activitatea de ntreprinztor; limitrii implicrii organelor
de control n activitatea de ntreprinztor, n special a organelor ce au atribuii de
control financiar; mbuntirii mediului concurenial i a celui fiscal, prin acordarea
facilitilor fiscale investitorilor, perfecionrii sistemului de administrare fiscal; prevenirii i combaterii corupiei; simplificrii procedurilor vamale i administrative n
scopul reducerii complexitii i timpului necesar pentru efectuarea operaiunilor de
export; perfecionrii sistemului judiciar existent prin transformarea acestuia n unul
independent, integru i calificat34.
Totui, dei au trecut deja circa 7 ani de la aprobarea Strategiei, situaia n privina atragerii ISD nu s-a mbuntit, dimpotriv, pe fundalul crizei economice i
financiare, decalajul rmnerii n urm fa de alte ri doar s-a majorat, obiectivele
propuse n mare parte nu au fost atinse, iar Strategia nu a devenit o foaie de par32
33
34
Investing Across Borders 2010, Investment Climate Advisory Services, the World Bank
Strategia de atragere a investiiilor i promovare a exporturilor pentru anii 2006-2015, capit. II, p. 22
Strategia de atragere a investiiilor i promovare a exporturilor pentru anii 2006-2015, capit. II, p. 50
49
curs pentru procesul investiional din RM. Acest lucru dovedete caracterul preponderent declarativ al Strategiei i necesitatea unor noi abordri cu privire la atragerea
investiiilor i crearea unui mediu investiional i de afaceri stimulator.
2.6.
Concluzii i recomandri
35
mbuntirea cadrului de reglementare al activitii de afaceri, al administrrii fiscale i vamale, reducerii birocraiei de stat, a poverii administrative i a corupiei, ridicrii eficienei i funcionalitii instituiilor de stat.
Cel mai important ns, este implementarea real a dezideratelor menionate mai sus, pentru c, dei, ideile respective sunt transpuse regulat
din program n program i din strategie n strategie, n practic ele nu
ajung a fi implementate, fie din cauza lipsei voinei politice, fie din cauza
slbiciunilor instituionale ale statului;
mbuntirea serviciilor de extensiune n scopul ntririi capacitilor IMM;
mbuntirea calitii resurselor umane, prin creterea investiiilor n
educaie i instruire, inclusiv a celor care urmresc formarea continu a
forei de munc;
Holger Gorg, David Greenaway Much Ado about Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from
Foreign Direct Investment?, the World Bank Research Observer, vol. 19, no. 2
50
Capitolul 2
Introducerea unor modificri legislative referitoare la protecia investitorilor n Codul fiscal i vamal i alte acte normative;
Eliminarea barierelor la exportul i importul produciei;
Simplificarea procedurilor pentru accesul la fondurile de stat, de suport a
IMM;
Protecia mai bun a drepturilor intelectuale i a mrcilor comerciale;
Reducerea presiunii fiscale i administrative asupra businessului;
Adaptarea curriculumului instituiilor educaionale la necesitile angajatorilor i cerinele pieei muncii;
Asigurarea unei informri permanente dintre IMM-urile din Moldova i
cele din afar, pentru reducerea costurilor de finanare;
Realizarea a cel puin 8 proiecte-pilot n tot attea raioane cu suportul
organizaiilor internaionale de dezvoltare n domeniul businessului, pentru mbuntirea condiiilor de finanare i a oportunitilor de afaceri n
aceste regiuni.
52
Capitolul
Capitolul3 3
Introducere
37
38
53
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
3.2.
Din totalitatea msurilor de sprijin financiar din partea statului, sistemul de impozitare reprezint factorul cel mai determinant n dezvoltarea structurilor economice
de scar mic39. Trebuie de menionat faptul c businessului mic i mijlociu, spre deosebire de alte ntreprinderi, i se ofer o gam larg de sisteme de contabilitate, raportare i fiscalitate. n practica mondial, n scopul dezvoltrii antreprenoriatului mic
i mijlociu sunt promovate regimuri fiscale speciale. Aceste regimuri fiscale permit
crearea un climat fiscal favorabil i reducerea poverii fiscale asupra ntreprinderilor40.
Figura 1. Forme de sprijin pentru ntreprinderile mici i mijlocii 41
financiar
patrimonial
informaional
consultativ
40
41
sprijinul
subiecilor ce
duc activitatea
economic
extern
sprijinul
subiecilor ce
duc activitatea
agricol
54
Capitolul 3
Este important de a determina posibilitatea utilizrii de ctre ntreprinderea concret a variantelor de impozitare innd cont de limitele stabilite42. Se cunoate faptul
c printre regimuri fiscale speciale aplicate de ctre ntreprinderile mici i mijlocii
sunt sistemul fiscal simplificat (SFS) i sistemul de impozitare sub forma impozitului
unic pe venit (SIFIUV). ns, aplicarea SIFIUV este redus doar la unele tipuri de
activiti, n timp ce utilizarea sistemului fiscal simplificat este posibil doar pentru
ntreprinderile care respect unele criterii stabilite, n special cele economice.
Practica mondial demonstreaz c anume businessul mic i mijlociu este fora
motrice n procesul de modernizare i tranziie ctre o economie dezvoltat43.
Companiile moldoveneti sunt nevoite s se adapteze la schimbrile frecvente
ale legislaiei fiscale i contradiciile sistemului de impozitare, ceea ce face dificil
planificarea pe termen lung i prognozarea activitii de antreprenoriat, impune trecerea n economia tenebr.
Relevana acestei probleme const n faptul c impozitarea ocup unul dintre
cele mai importante locuri din totalitatea relaiilor din cadrul economiei de pia i
reprezint un element esenial al mecanismului economic de gestionare a procesului
de producie44. Impozitele sunt cea mai mare i important surs de venituri pentru
bugetul statului. O nelegere corect a naturii economice a impozitrii formeaz
baza pentru mbuntirea mecanismului de utilizare practic a acestei categorii n
economie.
De eficiena i eficacitatea sistemului fiscal depinde stabilitatea funcionrii ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii, precum i atractivitatea lor pentru investiii45.
Sistemul rezonabil de impozitare a ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii, care provine
de la recunoaterea importanei economice i sociale a firmelor mici, ar trebui s se
bazeze pe urmtoarele principii:
businessul mic i mijlociu nu trebuie privit doar ca unul dintre furnizorii
principali ai veniturilor la buget, deoarece acesta reprezint i un fenomen social ce ofer locuri de munc, punerea n aplicare a activitii antreprenoriale, inovare, etc;
egalitatea contribuabililor trebuie, printr-o serie de scutiri i scheme fiscale, s compenseze ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii riscurile sporite, accesul
limitat la resurse i costuri marginale mari (pentru achitarea datoriilor fa
de stat) n comparaie cu ali ageni economici;
stabilitatea i simplicitatea impunerii fiscale;
oferirea libertii maxime autoritilor publice locale pentru reglementarea parametrilor sistemului de impozitare a ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii,
care au, n primul rnd, un specific local46.
42
43
44
45
46
Brooks K. International and EC Tax Aspects of Groups of Companies. Canada. IFBD, 2008.
Kesti J. European Tax Handbook 2007. Amsterdam. IFBD, 2007.
. ., . . // -2005-9 .31.
. . : . .: , 2009.
: ./ ., . . .- .: 2004.- 502
.
55
3.3.
48
49
.. .//
2005-3 .17.
Balaban E. Fiscalitatea agenilor economici. - Chiinu, 2008.
Balaban E. Fiscalitatea agenilor economici. - Chiinu, 2008.
56
Capitolul 3
La etapa iniial, raporturile fiscale apar indiferent dac agentul economic a nceput sau nu desfurarea activitii de antreprenoriat i se refer la:
I.
58
Capitolul 3
3.4.
50
51
52
Codul fiscal al Republicii Moldova. Legea Republicii Moldova Nr.1163-XIII din 24.04.97.
Balaban E. Fiscalitatea agenilor economici. - Chiinu, 2008.
. http://www.kreditbusiness.ru/problems/1791-problemynalogooblozhenija-biznesa.html
59
Sistemul de impozite
al Republicii Moldova
Impozite i taxe
generale de stat
1.
2.
3.
4.
Impozitul pe venit
Taxa pe valoarea adugat
Accize
Impozitul privat
1. Taxe vamale
2. Taxe rutiere
53
taxe
impozite
Codul fiscal al Republicii Moldova. Legea Republicii Moldova Nr.1163-XIII din 24.04.97.
60
Capitolul 3
Organe cu atribuii de
administrare fiscal
Organe fiscale
Inspectoratul
Fiscal Principal
de Stat
Inspectoratele
Fiscale de Stat
Teritoriale
Organele
Vamale
Curtea de
Conturi
Serviciile de colectare a
impozitelor din cadrul
primriilor
Aparatul fiscal (organul fiscal) al Republicii Moldova reprezint principalul element n sistemul unic de administrare fiscal. n componena acestuia sunt incluse
Inspectoratul Fiscal Principal de Stat (IFPS) i Inspectoratele Fiscale de Stat Teritoriale (IFST) care sunt subordonate IFPS.
Activitatea aparatului fiscal este determinat de Constituia Republicii Moldova,
Codul Fiscal, Legile Republicii Moldova, Hotrrile Guvernului, deciziile organelor
autoritilor publice locale n limitele drepturilor acordate lor.
3.5.
Complexitatea raporturilor dintre ntreprindere i stat duc nemijlocit la necesitatea de gestionare fiscal a activitii curente la nivel de ntreprindere. Reglementrile
de natur fiscal ofer adesea posibilitatea utilizrii mai multor metode pentru tratarea aceleiai probleme. Consecinele acestor variante sunt diferite, de aceea, nu se
poate face abstracie de instrumentele gestiunii fiscale.
Fiscalitatea are un aspect dublu. Pe de o parte, se concretizeaz obligativitatea
plii impozitelor (n determinarea sarcinii fiscale), care influeneaz situaia financiar a agentului economic. Pe de alt parte, agentul economic poate folosi i n interesul su principiile i metodele fiscale cu scopul de a ameliora situaia financiar.
Printr-o gestiune fiscal adecvat agentul economic poate optimiza plata impozitelor
fr a luneca n evaziune i fraud fiscal.
54
61
3.6.
62
Capitolul 3
Numr mediu
scriptic anual de
salariai
Sum anual a
veniturilor din vnzri
cel mult 3 milioane lei
cel mult 9
persoane
cel mult 49
persoane
cel mult 249
persoane
Valoare
total anual
de bilan a
activelor
nu depete 3
milioane lei
nu depete 25
milioane lei
nu depete 50
milioane lei
Surs: art.2 din Legea privind susinerea sectorului ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii nr.
206-XVI din 7 iulie 2006.
din activiti operaionale n sum de la 100000 la 600000 lei pot alege regimul de
impozitare prevzut de prezentul capitol sau regimul de impozitare aplicat n modul
general stabilit din momentul n care sunt nregistrai benevol n calitate de pltitori
de T.V.A.
(4) Agenii economici care, pe parcursul perioadei fiscale declarate, devin pltitori de T.V.A. vor aplica regimul de impozitare n modul general stabilit din momentul
n care sunt nregistrai ca pltitori de T.V.A.
(5) Agenii economici care, pe parcursul perioadei fiscale declarate, au ncetat
a fi pltitori de T.V.A., aplic regimul de impozitare menionat mai sus din momentul
anulrii nregistrrii ca contribuabil al TVA.
(6) Agenii economici care aplic regimul de impozitare sus-menionat utilizeaz
regulile de eviden prevzute la cap.6 din titlul II al Codului Fiscal.
Obiect al impunerii se consider venitul din activitatea operaional obinut n
perioada fiscal de declarare.
Cota impozitului pe venit constituie 3% din obiectul impunerii.
Calcularea impozitului pe venit se efectueaz prin aplicarea cotei impozitului
asupra venitului din activitatea operaional. Calcularea impozitului se efectueaz
trimestrial, iar achitarea la buget se efectueaz n termen de o lun de la ncheierea
trimestrului corespunztor.
Raportarea privind impozitul pe venit se prezint pn la data de 31 martie a
anului urmtor perioadei fiscale de declarare. Formularul i modul de completare a
drii de seam privind impozitul pe venit se aprob de ctre Ministerul Finanelor.
3.7.
Datorit importanei lor, prelevrile obligatorii, incluznd aici toate sumele vrsate de contribuabili, persoanele fizice i juridice, administraiilor publice (impozite,
taxe, contribuii sociale i alte prelevri cu coninut fiscal), cu condiia ca acestea
s nu fie legate de o decizie voluntar i, de asemenea, s nu fie nsoite de o con63
n determinarea presiunii fiscale trebuie fcut distincie ntre prelevrile obligatorii (veniturile fiscale) de ncasat, reflectate de dreptul de crean al statului asupra
contribuabililor i prelevrile obligatorii ncasate efectiv.
Astfel putem distinge:
- o presiune fiscal impus:
2) Pfi
Cele dou niveluri ale presiunii fiscale se vor identifica doar n condiiile nerealiste, de altfel, n care veniturile fiscale de ncasat vor fi i ncasate efectiv, ceea ce
implic ndeplinirea tuturor obligaiilor fiscale de ctre contribuabili, la timp i n cuantumul exact, adic o disciplin fiscal i o consimire total la impozit.
Pe lng aceast presiune fiscal obiectiv determinat tehnic, la nivel macroeconomic, prelevrile obligatorii exercit i o presiune fiscal psihologic (resimit)
care msoar pragul toleranei la impozit al fiecrui contribuabil.
Cel mai adesea, acesta ia forma presiunii fiscale individuale (Pfi), care este raportul dintre totalul prelevrilor obligatorii suportate de un contribuabil i totalul veniturilor obinute de acesta nainte de impozitare, astfel:
4) Pfi
Gogrnoiu Gh. Perfecionarea sistemelor fiscale n perspectiva integrrii europene i contribuiei la formarea veniturilor bugetare (experiene moldo-romne). Chiinu, 2007. Tez de doctor n economie.
64
Capitolul 3
58
Chicu N. Impactul impozitelor directe asupra anumitor procese social economice. Tez de doctor n
tiine economice. Chiinu, 2003.
Gogrnoiu Gh. Perfecionarea sistemelor fiscale n perspectiva integrrii europene i contribuiei la formarea veniturilor bugetare (experiene moldo-romne). Chiinu, 2007. Tez de doctor n economie.
65
3.8.
Conform datelor Bncii Mondiale, rata total de impozitare este una din cele mai
sczute din regiune:
Tabelul 2. Rata total de impozitare
ara
Rata total, %
31,2
44,2
54,1
55,4
43,1
Moldova
Romnia
Rusia
Ucraina
UE
Moldova
Romnia
Rusia
Ucraina
Impozit pe venit
rata general
MM
12
3*
16
16
20
13
19
0**
66
TVA
rata general
20
24
20
20
MM
20
24
20
20
Capitolul 3
Surse: Corporate tax rates table. http://www.kpmg.com/global/en/services/tax/taxtools-and-resources/pages/corporate-tax-rates-table.aspx i Ukraine: Tax holiday for
SMEs from April 2011. http://www.gw-world.com/en/ostnews-article/ostnews-nr-88/ukraine-tax-holiday-for-smes-from-april-2011/
* Pentru gospodriile rneti (de fermier) 7%.
** Pentru perioada aprilie 2011 decembrie 2015.
Astfel, avnd rate de impozitare relativ sczute (n comparaie cu alte state din
regiune), Republica Moldova demonstreaz o imagine cu presiune fiscal sczut
(n deosebi, pentru sectorul MM) i, deci, poate pretinde la un statut de paradis fiscal. Gradul de atractivitate a economiei depinde nu doar de rate de impozitare, ci i
de ali factori (inclusiv i cei fiscali), care, prin efectul lor negativ, uneori prevaleaz
asupra condiiilor pozitive i atractive create de presiunea fiscal sczut.
Din informaiile disponibile n raportul Doing Business 2013, emis sub egida International Finance Corporation i a Bncii Mondiale, rezult c Moldova nu are
la nivelul ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii, cel mai ridicat nivel de presiune fiscal. n
schimb, are alte probleme n domeniul administrrii fiscale, ceea ce exprim un anumit dezinteres al autoritilor.
n context, Moldova se afl nu pe cele mai favorabile locuri n clasamentul statelor dup nivelul economiei subterane ca pondere n PIB, n special n comparaie cu
statele-membre ale Uniunii Europene. Podiumul n UE este ocupat de state cu economii semnificativ mai mici: Bulgaria ( 32,5%), Estonia i Lituania ( cu cate 29,6%),
Romnia (29,4%).
Nivelul economiei tenebre n lume este n cretere. Dac n 1997 nivelul mediu
al economiei tenebre n lume era de 32,%, n 2009 acesta atingea 36,5%. O reducere nesemnificativ a nivelului acesteia a fost nregistrat numai n 11 ri, se mai
arat n studiu.
Conform unui raport al Bncii Mondiale, publicat n septembrie 2010, cea mai
mare medie a ponderii economiei subterane n PIB pe anii 1999-2007 l deinea
Georgia cu 68,8% din PIB, urmat de Bolivia cu 68,1% i Azerbaidjan cu 63,3%. Cel
mai redus nivel al economiei tenebre a fost nregistrat n Suedia 8,6%, SUA 8,8%
i Austria 9,8%. n acest context, Republica Moldova a nregistrat n anii 1999-2006
o medie de 45,08%.59
n raportul Bncii Mondiale, de asemenea, se remarc faptul c structura fiscal din Republica Moldova nu are deosebiri majore, n afara de una: ponderea altor
impozite n veniturile fiscale totale este mai ridicat dect n alte ri. Aceasta este
consecina unui sistem fiscal complicat, care include multe taxe i impozite mici, prin
manipularea crora sarcina fiscal se poate modifica operativ. Pe parcursul ultimului
deceniu, reformele din sistemul fiscal bugetar al unor ri au dus la o oarecare simplificare a sistemului fiscal, dar complexitatea sistemului reduce eficiena politicii fiscal
bugetare i duce la creterea costurilor administrative.
59
67
3.9.
Capitolul 3
proprietar, utilizarea mainilor de cas i de control reprezint o cale de control suplimentar asupra angajailor si i a businessul legal.
n ceea ce privete impozitul pe venit la o rat de 3% pentru nepltitorii de TVA, unii
participani la forum au sugerat c ar trebui s se acorde atenie la urmtoarele aspecte:
Capitolul 71 din Codul fiscal s fie aplicat doar pentru microntreprinderi i ntreprinderi mici, care sunt prevzute de Lege privind susinerea sectorului ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii nr. 206-XVI din 7 iulie 2006.
De asemenea, a fost propus ideea ca aceast opiune de impozitare s fie aplicat numai agenilor economici ai cror fondatori sunt persoane fizice.
Salariu
n opinia participanilor la forum, exist dou motive principale pentru care nu se
pltesc salarii oficial:
1. cheltuieli substaniale ale ntreprinderilor mici pentru plata contribuiilor
obligatorii de asigurri medicale i sociale ale angajatorilor;
2. angajaii acestor ntreprinderi nu sunt dispui s accepte salarii oficiale.
Practica arat c angajaii prefer remunerarea oficial n urmtoarele cazuri:
angajaii care au primit deja sau intenioneaz s obin un mprumut
bancar, pentru c banca are nevoie de a evalua solvabilitatea acestui angajat i pentru aceasta banca utilizeaz informaiile oficiale (certificat de
la locul de munc, declaraia privind impozitul pe venit pentru perioada
precedent);
persoanele care sunt la vrsta de pre-pensionare (de obicei cu 5-7 ani
nainte de vrsta de pensionare) pentru a obine o pensie mai mare;
familiile tinere ce intenioneaz s aib copii.
Astfel, n scopul reducerii numrului de cazuri de pli salariale n plicuri, participanii au optat pentru urmtoarea soluie60. Pentru ntreprinderile mici care ndeplinesc toate cerinele urmtoare:
cifr anual de afaceri (de vnzri) pn la 3.000.000 lei,
numrul mediu de salariai nu este mai mare de 10 persoane,
s fie stabilit o valoare absolut pentru fiecare angajat, cu plat trimestrial n
funcie de numrul mediu de personal, pornind de la contribuiile de asigurare obligatorie de asisten medical achitate de angajator (3,5%) i contribuiile de asigurrile
sociale (23%).
Mrimea acestei valori absolute urmeaz s fie stabilit anual, la o rat de 20%
din 80% din salariul mediu proiectat n economie stabilit de guvern. Cota de 80%
se propune numai pentru municipiile Bli i Chiinu, pentru alte orae 65%, iar
pentru localitile rurale 50%.
n consecin, antreprenorul iniial va nelege c nu este eficient s ofere angajailor mai puin de 60% din salariul mediu lunar prognozat (n anul 2013 acesta este
egal 2310 lei), deoarece oricum pltete asigurrile sociale i medicale din aceast
sum. n acelai timp, angajaii vor primi un salariu oficial, iar ncasrile de la im60
40 . http://gagauzinfo.md/index.
php?newsid=875
69
3.10.
Concluzii i recomandri
Capitolul 3
4.1.
Introducere
72
4.2.
Capitolul 4
SMS Bankingul este utilizat inclusiv pentru verificarea soldurilor sau pentru
solicitri de informaii curente cum ar fi cursul de schimb valutar, rata dobnzii la
depozite publicate de banc. Clientul bncii are opiunea de a selecta dintr-o list
predefinit de alerte informaia pe care s o recepioneze pe telefon. n funcie de opiunea aleas, un client poate fi autorizat s efectueze tranzacii, fie non-financiare,
fie ambele tipuri de tranzacii: financiare i non-financiare.
Sumarul celor mai rspndite servicii prin SMS:
Raportarea periodic a soldului contului (de exemplu la sfritul lunii)
Executarea cu succes sau neexecutarea ordinelor de plat programate
Executarea cu succes a unui cec emis aferent contului clientului
Informarea privind insuficiena de fonduri
Informarea privind retrageri mari de pe conturi
Primirea OTP-ului (one time password) pentru autentificare
Solicitri de extrase de cont
Plata facturilor
Transferarea banilor ntre conturile clientului
Solicitri de stopare a unei pli, transfer, executare de cecuri
Solicitri de suspendare a cardurilor, fie din motiv c au fost pierdute sau
PIN-ul a fost compromis
Informaie despre curs valutar
Informaie despre rata dobnzii la depozite
Serviciile de banking la distan depind n mare msur i de prezena Internetului n casele utilizatorilor (populaiei). Or, anume populaia este consumatorul de
baz a serviciilor bancare la distan i de eCommerce. n rile europene, nivelul
de acces la Internet pentru
gospodrii este cu mult mai Tabelul 2: Nivelul de acces la Internet a
gospodriilor n rile europene, %
mare dect n RM. Acesta
este prezentat n tabelul 2.
ri
2010
2011
2012
Astfel, media europeaEU (27 ri)
70
73
76
n de acces la Internet a
Cehia
61
67
65
gospodriilor este de 76%
Germania
82
83
85
din total, cel mai mare nivel de 92% este nregistrat
75
Estonia
68
71
n Suedia, 54% din totalul
Spania
59
64
68
gospodriilor din Romnia
Frana
74
76
80
au acces la Internet, pe
Italia
59
62
63
cnd n RM cota lor este
Romnia
42
47
54
de doar 35%, dar a nregistrat progrese semnificaSlovacia
67
71
75
tive n ultimii 3 ani.
Suedia
88
91
92
eCommerce adic
Marea Britanie
80
83
87
comerul prin Internet este
Sursa: Eurostat
destul de rspndit n
75
4.3.
ri
Europa
Frana
Cehia
Germania
Spania
Italia
Estonia
Romnia
Slovacia
Marea Britanie
Suedia
2010
14
13
19
18
11
5
11
4
11
16
18
2011
14
14
25
17
11
5
10
3
16
18
19
2012
15
14
24
17
14
6
13
4
12
19
20
Sursa: Eurostat
Sursa: ANRCETI
76
Capitolul 4
Conform datelor statistice, n anul 2012 n RM, peste 417 mii de abonai aveau
acces la internet fix. Dintre acetia, 20,6 mii reprezint persoane juridice, iar 388,7
mii sunt gospodrii. n aceste condiii, peste un milion de locuitori au acces la Internet. n dinamic, gradul de penetrare a tehnologiilor este foarte rapid. Evoluia accesului la Internet din ultimii trei ani poate fi urmrit n figura de mai jos, unde este
prezentat ponderea gospodriilor RM care au avut acces la internet n perioada
2010-2012.
ns, numrul real de utilizatori de Internet este mai mare. n 2012 au fost nregistrai peste 178 mii de utilizatori de Internet Mobil, dintre care peste 154 mii persoane fizice i peste 24 mii persoane juridice.
Tabel 4: Numrul de utilizatori internet mobil dedicat, abonai
Anul /abonai
2011
2012
24.094
19.741
105.072
154.365
124.813
178.459
Tip
Ageni economici
Persoane fizice
Total utilizatori Internet Mobil
Sursa: ANRCETI
77
pofida faptului c este un mediu favorabil i sunt oferite platforme tehnologice, utilizatorii cardurilor rmn adepi ai tranzaciilor cu numerar.
Mai mult ca att, ponderea plilor fr numerar n RM cu carduri emise peste
hotare este de 29,6%, indicnd c deintorii de carduri strine au un grad i o
cultur de plat fr numerar superior utilizatorilor autohtoni de carduri.
n acelai timp, din totalul tranzaciilor efectuate n strintate cu cardurile emise
n RM, 76% reprezint plile fr numerar. Astfel, putem concluziona c mediul de
peste hotare nu ncurajeaz utilizarea numerarului.
4.4.
Capitolul 4
fost exprimate, contrar cererilor companiilor mari care au pli frecvente. eCommerce, care ar duce la electronizarea la distan a plilor clienilor micului business, este
o facilitate care a trezit interesul a cca 50%, dar nici unul din acetia nu au apelat la
furnizorii de astfel de servicii i nici nu au planificat n timpul apropiat s examineze
realizarea produciei/serviciilor proprii prin intermediul eCommerce. Astfel, o cerere
real pentru astfel de servicii din partea micului business la etapa actual lipsete. Mai mult ca att, este important de contientizat faptul c pentru dezvoltarea
n mas a eCommerce-ului i, respectiv a utilizrii plilor electronice la distan de
ctre populaie n relaiile cu micul business sunt necesare o serie de rechizite. O
condiie primordial este prezena informaiei exhaustive despre serviciile i produsele sale i price-listuri confortabile pentru clieni, deoarece un produs sau un serviciu poate fi achiziionat doar dup ce clientul poate face cunotin cu produsele i
serviciile oferite, parametrii tehnici ale acestora, condiiile de livrare i, nu n ultimul
rnd, preul. Fr o cultur de transparen informaional platformele de plat la
distan sunt absolut inutile.
Astfel, dac n mare parte, respondenii deineau pagini web ale companiei,
atunci foarte puini aveau publicate nomenclatura i price-listul produselor i serviciilor oferite. La momentul actual, acest potenial este valorificat cu succes de companiile mari, micul business fiind doar n faza incipient de digitalizare a informaiei
despre produsele sale. Fr formarea culturii de comunicare electronic privind produsele i serviciile micului business, eCommerce-ul, pe acest segment de ntreprinderi, nu poate fi dezvoltat pe larg.
4.5.
bncii, efectuate la ghieu, pe suport de hrtie, sunt n limitele 2-4 lei, iar
prin intermediul Internet Bankingului aceste costuri sunt reduse la 0-3 lei.
Transferul n favoarea clienilor altor bnci cost n majoritatea bncilor,
la ghieu, pe suport de hrtie, 5-6 lei, iar prin intermediul Internet Bankingului aceste costuri sunt reduse la 3-5 lei.
Operaiune
Pli n lei
Pli valutare
Prezentarea electronic a documentelor justificative
pentru plile valutare
Conversie valutar
Alimentare card de business de pe cont curent
Alimentare cont curent de pe business card
Extragere (export) date din Internet Banking
Import date n Internet Banking
Versiune Mobile
Capitolul 4
4.6.
Concluzii i recomandri
81
Un alt factor care descurajeaz utilizarea soluiile la distan deriv din faptul c
Moldova este o ar mic i cea mai mare parte a vieii economice este concentrat n mun. Chiinu, respectiv, majoritatea tranzaciilor au loc face-to-face, ntre
clientul final i furnizorul de bunuri sau servicii.
n prezent, toate bncile din RM ofer un set de funcionaliti care, n cea mai
mare parte, corespunde necesitilor companiilor din sectorul IMM i micro. De fapt,
studiile arat c n rile dezvoltate, i Moldova nu este o excepie, motorul dezvoltrii soluiilor tehnologice de ctre bnci pentru companii sunt corporaiile mari,
care efectueaz un volum mare de operaiuni. Acestea sunt semnificativ mai sofisticate, de regul, cu ntindere geografic extins, transfrontalier i beneficiile sunt
mai importante la utilizarea tehnologiilor noi oferite de instituiile financiare. Ulterior,
aceste tehnologii sunt transpuse i adaptate pentru companiile mici i mijlocii. Spre
exemplu, funcionalitile n eBanking de import i export de ordine de plat i alte
date n format variat (dbf, xml, vcf pentru aplicaii ca 1C, SAP etc.) au un efect major
asupra companiilor mari care execut zeci i sute de tranzacii pe zi. Soluiile de interfaare cu propriul soft oferite de Internet Banking pentru corporaii pot fi un factor
suficient de critic pentru a decide n favoarea soluiei unei bnci sau alteia. IMM-urile
cu un numr relativ redus de pli, nu percep importana acestor funcionaliti, dar,
totui, ulterior, progresnd i absorbind noi tehnologii (contabilitate automatizat) pot
beneficia la dorin de aceste funcionaliti pentru optimizarea i eficientizarea timpului consumat pentru evidena operaiunilor cu banca. Cert este faptul c, cerinele
IMM-urilor n domeniul electronic vor merge pe urma corporaiilor mari i ceea ce
devine actual pentru IMM-uri de cele mai multe ori este deja implementat de ctre
bnci sub presiunea cerinelor clienilor corporativi mari. n Moldova, progresul dat
decurge la fel ca n celelalte ri ale lumii cu economie de pia.
Costul numerarului - unul din factorii eseniali care descurajeaz la etapa actual progresarea tehnologiilor digitale n domeniul financiar-bancar, n special a soluiilor de eCommerce.
Operaiunile cu numerar n Republica Moldova sunt semnificativ mai ieftine comparativ cu Uniunea European. Mai mult ca att, o serie de tranzacii, n special, din
cele oferite populaiei sunt gratuite. Nu vom intra n detaliile economico-social-politice ale factorilor care determin preul redus al procesrii operaiunilor cu numerar.
Cert este faptul c atta timp ct preul dat va fi mai mic n comparaie cu preul
pachetelor de servicii electronice, migrarea n mas a agenilor economici i a populaiei la acest tip de servicii nu va avea loc. mai ales c, suplimentar la ineria cutumei
de utilizare a numerarului, operaiunile cu numerar fac mult mai simpl evaziunea
fiscal, salariile n plic etc.
n aceste condiii, este evident c doar efortul comunitii bancare nu va duce la
progrese semnificative n termeni scuri i medii. Trebuie de menionat c preurile
la serviciile prestate prin Internet Banking de cele mai multe ori sunt mai mici dect
serviciile prestate la ghieu. Acesta este un factor stimulator pentru utilizarea mai pe
larg a serviciilor bancare la distan pentru ntreprinderi, dar este un factor minor i
las pasivi clienii, atunci cnd i operaiunile cu numerar sunt la un pre ignorabil.
Progresul eCommerce-ului ar reprezenta un factor care ar aduce att IMM-urile,
82
Capitolul 4
ct i clienii lor n domeniul operaiunilor electronice. Dar, n Moldova gradul de utilizare a serviciilor bancare electronice n rndul populaiei este redus i IMM-urile au
un grad de pasivitate nalt pe trmul virtual. Astfel, i serviciile de informare electronic au un grad rudimentar pentru potenialii clieni. Premisele pentru eCommerce
activ nu sunt nc coapte la etapa actual.
Un grad mai rapid de penetrare ar avea utilizarea plilor cu cardul, dar lipsa
unui operator naional duce la costuri suficient de nalte la achiziionarea de carduri
internaionale att pentru comerciani, ct i pentru persoanele fizice. Costurile pentru eCommerce sunt considerabile. De exemplu, n cazurile tranzaciilor, pli pentru servicii/produse/comer electronic. Costurile acestor servicii oscileaz n limitele
intervalului 2-7%. Conform regulilor sistemelor de pli (VisaCard i MasterCard),
aceste costuri trebuie s fie retrase din volumul tranzaciei de la vnztor. n acest
caz, vnztorul de servcicii-mrfuri nu are dreptul s impun comisioane suplimentare la valoarea bunurilor/serviciilor. Preul serviciilor i bunurilor achiziionate trebuie
s includ deja aceste costuri tarifare. Pentru multe tipuri de activiti, aceste tarife i
comisioane reduc profitul, iar afacerile devin nerentabile.
Soluiile de fast pay ar reprezenta o alternativ inclusiv de substituire a cardurilor
la efectuarea plilor. Dar, deocamdat, s-au dovedit a fi fiabile doar terminalele care
asigur achitarea unei serii de servicii n afara sediilor bancare, care, de asemenea,
se rezum n final la colectarea de numerar de la populaie. Noua lege privind banii
electronici ar putea aduce un impuls nou dezvoltrii soluiilor de pli electronice.
Un loc aparte n aceste soluii de viitor l ocup gradul de securizare al operrii
sistemului. Asigurarea acestui element poate lungi procesul de elaborare i implementare a noilor sisteme IT i crete presiunea bugetelor IT asupra implementatorilor. Or, fraudele electronice cresc exponenial n ntreaga lume.
Sumarul concluziilor privind relaia IMM-urilor i soluiile de Internet Banking se divizeaz n dou domenii distincte:
A. Serviciile electronice la distan efectuate de ctre IMM n relaia cu instituiile
financiar-bancare (servicii i tranzacii aferente conturilor bancare proprii)
Concluziile cheie sunt:
1. Sub presiunea corporaiilor mari, bncile comerciale ofer pachete de
Internet Banking suficient de sofisticate pentru necesitile IMM-urilor.
Astfel, de cele mai multe ori, serviciile date acoper integral necesitile
de deservire la distan a IMM-urilor. Toate cele 14 bnci ofer soluii de
Internet Banking pentru persoane juridice, iar piaa dat este suficient de
matur.
2. Tarifele propuse de bncii pentru soluiile de Internet Banking sunt suficient de reduse, iar n multe cazuri gratuite. De cele mai multe ori, tranzaciile efectuate prin Internet Banking au un cost redus comparativ cu preul
standard.
B. Serviciile electronice la distan efectuate de ctre IMM n relaia cu clienii
si, n special persoanele fizice. Piaa serviciilor eCommerce:
83
84
Capitolul
Capitolul5 5
5.1.
Introducere
Agricultura este un instrument fundamental pentru dezvoltarea durabil i reducerea srciei. Totui, constrngerile financiare n agricultur sunt omniprezente,
fiind costisitoare i distribuite inechitabil, limitnd sever abilitatea MM i a micro ntreprinderilor agricole de a concura. Schimbrile brute i dramatice ale preurilor la
alimente au expus vulnerabilitatea produciei agricole de a satisface cererea global,
reclamnd investiii considerabile n agricultur, la toate nivelurile. ntrebarea este n
ce mod volumul necesar de investiii pentru agricultur poate fi achiziionat, n special ntr-un mediu provocator n care incertitudinea financiar determin o reducere
a resurselor disponibile asociat cu atitudinea reticent fa de risc. Un rspuns n
abordarea acestor constrngeri trece dincolo de msurile convenionale, fiind dificil
finanarea agriculturii prin intermediul instituiilor i abordrilor financiare formale.
Mediul pentru finanarea agricol este n continuare influenat de concentrarea
tot mai mare a controlului n sectorul agricol. Determinate de ctigurile din economiile de scar i globalizarea lanului alimentar, asociate cu accesul la resurse, ntreprinderile agricole multinaionale i alte uniti economice interconectate la acestea,
au un impact din ce n ce mai mare ntr-un sector care se caracterizeaz prin creterea integrrii verticale i orizontale. Consecinele integrrii intense sunt profunde,
n special pentru micii agricultori i alte persoane care sunt n afara lanurilor interconectate.
Agricultura evolueaz spre un sistem modern, extrem de competitiv, condus de
cererea de consum la produse de valoare mai mare i cu un grad mai ridicat de procesare, standarde de calitate consistent i siguran.
n consecin, creterea productivitii i competitivitii ntreprinderilor agricole
mici i micro i participarea lor la aceste lanuri valorice globale au fost constatate ca
prioriti ale agendei agricultura pentru dezvoltare61.
Cel puin, aceste argumente au determinat genericul mesei rotunde Strategii de
finanare a MM din sectorul agrar desfurat n cadrul celui de-al 4-lea Forum Moldo-German privind finanarea ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii ca fiind de o actualitate
i semnificaie greu de supraapreciat.
61
World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development, The World Bank, Washington D.C.
85
5.2.
Din numrul total de ntreprinderi din economia naional n 2011, ntreprinderile din agricultur au deinut 5%. Dup criteriul eficienei, unitile economice din
agricultur s-au clasat sub media nregistrat de agenii economici din economia
naional. Astfel, dac din numrul mediu de salariai care au activat n ntreprinderile din economia naional, ntreprinderile din agricultur au deinut 9%, atunci,
n venitul din vnzri aceste uniti au nregistrat ponderea de 3,4%, iar n valoarea
profitului 2%.
Numrul mediu de
salariai, persoane
16184
19307
26547
7258
101
660
976
1440
49444 300223
73057
1084
16095
18565
26066
MM, total
47970
Economia
naional
ntreprinderi mijlocii
2538
4707
Economia
naional
ntreprinderi mici
Agricultura
Rezultatul financiar:
profit (+) / pierderi
(-), mil. lei
Economia
naional
Economia
naional
864
14824
2262
-42
50
423
432
ntreprinderi micro
Total pe
categorii
Numrul de ntreprinderi
Economia
naional
38336
90432
9821
-25
15089
12322
21509
Agricultura
1391
3694
385
-41
607
385
893
Agricultura
2477
36246
4930
-53
659
937
1418
1538
87577
24892
394
99
910
599
Agricultura
222
17728
2283
29
129
93
9570 122214
38344
716
907
5333
3958
Agricultura
86
Capitolul 5
n 2011, MM au reprezentat 97,6% din numrul total de ntreprinderi din economia naional i 97,6% din numrul total de ntreprinderi din agricultur (tabelul 1).
n structura MM din agricultur, ntreprinderile mijlocii au nregistrat n 2011 ponderea de 9,0%, ntreprinderile mici 34,9%, iar ntreprinderile micro 56,1%.
Amintim, n acest context, c, n conformitate cu Legea nr. 206 din 07.07.2006
privind susinerea sectorului ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii, n Republica Moldova,
sectorul ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii se constituie din totalitatea ntreprinderilor micro, mici i mijlocii.
n calitate de ntreprindere micro poate fi considerat agentul economic care
corespunde urmtoarelor criterii: numrul mediu scriptic anual de salariai de cel
mult 9 persoane, suma anual a veniturilor din vnzri de cel mult 3 milioane de lei i
valoarea anual bilanier a activelor ce nu depete 3 milioane de lei.
ntreprinderea mic este agentul economic care corespunde urmtoarelor criterii: numrul mediu scriptic anual de salariai de cel mult 49 de persoane, suma anual a veniturilor din vnzri de cel mult 25 milioane de lei i valoarea total anual de
bilan a activelor ce nu depete 25 milioane de lei, cu excepia agenilor economici
care cad sub incidena definiiei formulate pentru ntreprinderea micro.
Poate fi considerat ntreprindere mijlocie, agentul economic care corespunde urmtoarelor criterii: numrul mediu scriptic anual de salariai de cel mult 249
de persoane, suma anual a veniturilor din vnzri de cel mult 50 milioane de lei i
valoarea total anual
de bilan a activelor ce
Figura 1: MM din agricultur repartizate dup
nu depete 50 milicapacitatea lor de a genera profit, 2011.
oane de lei, cu excep1000
ia agenilor economici
numrul de ntreprinderi care nu au
893
care cad sub incidena
venituri din vnzri
900
celor definiiilor de n800
treprindere micro i
numrul de ntreprinderi care au
ntreprindere mic.
obinut profit
700
Din numrul total
607
de ntreprinderi mijlocii
numrul de ntreprinderi care au
600
suportat pierderi
care au activat n 2011
n agricultur, 41,9%
500
423 432
au generat pierderi,
385
400
58,1% (129 de uniti
economice) au obinut
300
profit. n cazul ntreprinderilor mici, 50%
200
129
dintre acestea au su93
portat pierderi, 49% au
100
50
2
nregistrat profit. Situa0
ia este i mai dramantreprinderi
ntreprinderi
ntreprinderi
tic n cazul ntreprinm ijlocii
m ici
m icro
derilor agricole micro:
87
64.2% dintre acestea au avut un rezultat financiar negativ, profitul a fost caracteristic
doar pentru 27,7%.
Iat cteva cauze ce determin performane financiare reduse n cazul MM i
micro ntreprinderilor agricole:
dimensiunea mic a unitii economice (gospodriei) agricole i a proprietii funciare. Creterea dimensiunii unitilor economice agricole este
esenial pentru mbuntirea performanelor economice i financiare n
agricultur;
riscurile nalte caracteristice activitilor agricole;
performanele economice ale agricultorilor sub impactul specificului agrar
cunosc evoluii fluctuante pronunate cu impact direct asupra potenialului lor financiar;
pregtirea insuficient a agricultorilor n domeniul economic i financiar;
competitivitatea redus a produciei agricole, att pe piaa intern, ct i
pe pieele externe. Situaia este agravat i de ritmurile lente de modernizare a ntreprinderilor din agricultur i industria de prelucrare.
5.3.
Cheltuielile guvernamentale, att cele de capital, ct i cele curente, sunt considerate principalul instrument al politicii agricole promovate de autoritile guvernamentale. Aceste cheltuieli devin subvenii dac costurile lor nu sunt recuperate de
la beneficiari. Subveniile bugetare sunt subvenii explicite, politica agricol ofer,
ns, i subvenii implicite. Un exemplu comun sunt taxele vamale, care, ntr-o
oarecare msur, protejeaz productorii interni de concurena internaional i,
astfel, subvenioneaz, implicit, costurile de producie mai mari. Controlul preurilor
constituie subvenii implicite (sau invers, impozite implicite), deoarece acestea sunt
de multe ori stabilite la niveluri care subvenioneaz consumatorii i contribuabilii. Exist, de asemenea, subvenii implicite n domeniul managementului resurselor
naturale, atunci cnd un utilizator nu pltete toate daunele pe care le cauzeaz.
Beneficiile pe care le ofer subveniile implicite productorilor sunt uneori numite
rente economice.
n agricultur, cele mai frecvente exemple de subvenii explicite sunt urmtoarele:
construirea sistemelor de irigaii, costul crora este foarte rar recuperat n
totalitate de la utilizatori;
alocarea cu titlu gratuit sau vnzarea subvenionat a terenurile agricole
ale statului cu sau fr eliberarea unui titlu de proprietate absolut;
Creditul pentru producie emis de bncile de stat sau acordat de bncile
comerciale la o rat a dobnzii mai mic dect rata dobnzii de pia datorit liniilor de refinanare ale guvernului. Subvenia se poate manifesta
n nivelul ratelor dobnzilor sau n absena msurilor normale care ar
permite obinerea rambursrii mprumuturilor;
88
Capitolul 5
89
90
Capitolul 5
bine aceste programe vizeaz sracii i b) cum s fie ajutai cei sraci
astfel nct acetia s-i creasc capacitatea de a-i mbunti starea
lor economic viitoare i nu doar s fie ameliorate simptomele cele mai
presante ale srciei existente. Prin aceast ultim abordare este perpetuat asistena i ncurajat dependena beneficiarilor de subvenii. Prima abordare permite dispariia treptat a asistenei. Acest principiu este
recunoscut pe scar larg, dar dificil de aplicat.
Din motive practice i teoretice, unele externaliti economice i de mediu, justific, de asemenea, existena subveniilor. Agricultorii care planteaz copaci sau construiesc terase pentru a controla eroziunea solului,
genereaz beneficii pentru ei nii, dar i pentru alii din acelai bazin
hidrografic, ceea ce justific ca societatea s suporte o parte din costurile
acestui tip de investiii. Acest lucru este valabil i pentru plantarea pe scar larg a copacilor n scopul izolrii emisiilor de gaze cu efect de ser.
Subvenii temporare pot fi uneori necesare pentru a facilita tranziia spre
un regim de politici mai puin subvenionate.
n cazurile de urgen, cum ar fi cele cauzate de catastrofe naturale, victimele primesc subvenii. Totui, utilizarea acestora trebuie urmrit cu
precauie. Astfel, n numeroase sisteme juridice, clasarea n zon de dezastru n caz de secet, de exemplu, poate scuti agricultorii de obligaia de
a rambursa mprumuturile lor de producie, chiar dac pierderea culturilor
nu este complet, ceea ce, la rndul su, ar putea crea dificulti pentru
bnci, descurajndu-le, n cele din urm, s-i extind activitile n agricultur.
Subveniile pot fi, de asemenea, utilizate pentru a compensa unele cazuri
de imperfeciuni informaionale. Un exemplu frecvent este cazul agricultorilor din zonele ndeprtate care nu au informaii fiabile cu privire la
preurile de pia i pentru care Guvernul pltete costul de diseminare
regulat a preurilor, de exemplu, prin intermediul radioului. ntr-adevr,
poate fi dificil depistarea agenilor de publicitate gata s acopere costurile de emisiune destinate acestui grup de clieni.
Alte tipuri de eecuri ale pieei ar putea necesita utilizarea subveniilor.
Dar, se recomand maxim pruden. Astfel, de multe ori, reglementarea
poate constitui un rspuns mai adaptat i adecvat comparativ cu subvenionarea. n plus, nu toate cazurile de disfuncionalitate a pieei necesit
aciunea guvernului. Fenomenul de asimetrie informaional ntre creditori i debitori (privind capacitatea i disponibilitatea debitorului de a rambursa) a fost subiectul multor comentarii n literatur, iar politica de multe
ori rspunde, n acest sens, prin elaborarea unui cadru de reglementare
financiar favorabil dezvoltrii micro-finanrii. Cu toate acestea, n unele
cazuri, au fost utilizate subvenii pentru filialele din mediul rural ale bncilor pentru a le ncuraja s contacteze potenialii clieni rurali. Educaia i
formarea profesional sunt exemple clasice de situaii care justific sprijinul financiar guvernamental deoarece un furnizor comercial de servicii
91
5.4.
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
22415,6 26146,9 27342,7 29328,9 32100,9
2012
35373,5
1228,3
1243,6
1034,0
857,8
843,4
1272,8
2,30
1,98
1,71
1,19
1,03
1,45
92
Capitolul 5
Tabelul 3 conine informaia cu privire la evoluia mrimii fondului de subvenionare a productorilor agricoli. Din datele prezentate observm c dinamica fondului
se caracterizeaz printr-o volatilitate pronunat.
Tabelul 3. Fondul de subvenionare a productorilor agricoli, mil. lei
Fondul de subvenionare a productorilor agricoli, prevzut
Fondul de subvenionare a productorilor agricoli, executat
2006
256,0
2007
465,3
2008
270,0
2009
563,5
2010
400,0
2011
400,0
247,7
546,8
533,2
560,5
400,0
400,0
2011
(10 msuri)
Stimularea creditrii productorilor agricoli de
ctre bncile comerciale,
organizaiile de microfinanare i asociaiile de
economii i mprumut
Stimularea asigurrii Stimularea asigurrii
riscurilor n agricul- riscurilor de producie n
tur
agricultur
2012
(8 msuri)
Stimularea creditrii productorilor
agricoli de ctre
instituiile financiare
2013
(10 msuri)
Stimularea creditrii productorilor
agricoli de ctre
instituiile financiare
Stimularea investiiilor
pentru producerea legumelor pe teren protejat
(serii de iarn, solarii,
tuneluri)
93
2010
(8 msuri)
Stimularea investiiei
pentru procurarea
tehnicii i utilajului
agricol precum i a
echipamentului de
irigare
2011
(10 msuri)
Stimularea investiiilor
pentru procurarea tehnicii i utilajului agricol,
echipamentului ce formeaz sisteme de irigare,
sisteme anti-nghe i
instalaii antigrindin
2012
(8 msuri)
Stimularea investiiilor pentru
procurarea tehnicii
i utilajului agricol,
echipamentului ce
formeaz sisteme
de irigare, sisteme
anti-nghe i instalaii antigrindin
Stimularea investiiilor
n utilarea i renovarea
tehnologic a fermelor
zootehnice
Stimularea procurrii
animalelor de prsil i
meninerii fondului genetic
Stimularea investiiilor
pentru dezvoltarea infrastructurii post-recoltare i procesare
2013
(10 msuri)
Stimularea investiiilor pentru
procurarea tehnicii
i utilajului agricol,
echipamentului ce
formeaz sisteme
de irigare, sisteme anti-nghe i
instalaii antigrindin
Stimularea investiiilor pentru utilarea i renovarea
tehnologic a fermelor zootehnice
Stimularea procurrii animalelor de
prsil i meninerii fondului genetic
al acestora
Stimularea investiiilor pentru dezvoltarea infrastructurii post-recoltare
i procesare
Stimularea irigrii
terenurilor agricole
94
Capitolul 5
95
Msurile de subvenionare nu au la baz concepte finalizate care s reias din aplicarea analizei cost beneficiu.
Obiectivele msurilor subvenionate nu sunt msurate cu ajutorul indicatorilor de performan care s poat fi urmrii n timp.
O alt problem generat de msurile subvenionate este cadrul anual
pentru care se prevede subvenionarea, ceea ce afecteaz procesul de
planificare n cadrul unitilor economice agricole care beneficiaz de finanare subvenionat.
Condiiile de concurs nu au la baz abordri obiective i echitabile, dar
favorizeaz anumii ageni economici, fiind n defavoarea ntreprinderilor
mici i micro.
Dei numrul anual al beneficiarilor a crescut n timp, totui acesta este
neglijabil comparativ cu numrul unitilor agricole dispuse s beneficieze de subvenii.
Gospodrii
rneti
SRL
SA
Cooperative
Altele
Total
2072
118214525
2063
79427202
47
22
2004
87
152
116
4431
378603818
28169434
21491542
13655288
560134607
1968 239466488
83 15302415
147 13947549
114
7959724
4375 356103377
45
2
3
3
100
67
4
4
2
100
Aprobarea
subveniilor
Solicitri de subvenii
Tabelul 5. Repartizarea fondului de subvenionare pe forme organizatoricojuridice a agenilor economici din agricultur, 2012
99,57 67,19
98,20
95,40
96,71
98,28
98,74
63,25
54,32
64,90
58,29
63,57
5.5.
Capitolul 5
consumatorii finali i gestiunea reziduurilor dup utilizare. Aceste activiti includ proiectarea, producia, comercializarea, distribuia i serviciile de sprijin care conduc la
consum (i de multe ori dincolo de consum, atunci cnd sunt luate n considerare
procesele de reciclare). Aceste activiti pot fi concentrate ntr-o singur firm sau
distribuite ntre diferite firme; localizate ntr-o singur aezare geografic sau rspndite pe arii mai extinse. Termenul lanul valoric se refer la faptul c valoarea
este adugat produselor preliminare prin asocierea cu alte resurse (de exemplu,
unelte i instrumente, for de munc, cunotine i abiliti, alte materii prime sau
produse preliminare). Odat cu trecerea produsului prin etapele lanului valoric, valoarea acestuia crete63.
Inserarea productorilor mici i mijlocii n lanurile valorice agricole naionale, regionale i internaionale, suport consecine importante pentru reducerea srciei n
zonele rurale din rile cu venituri mici pe locuitor datorit potenialului acestor ageni
economici de a crete veniturile i crea locuri de munc. Cu toate acestea, majoritatea micilor fermieri din rile srace se confrunt cu o serie de constrngeri care
limiteaz adesea capacitatea lor de a participa competitiv n aceste lanuri, ducnd la
excluderea acestor productori de la oportuniti importante de cretere.
Rolul i importana micilor productori agricoli pentru agricultura Republicii Moldova i potenialul acestora de a fi inclui n diverse lanuri valorice agricole pot fi
observate din tabelul 6 care prezint structura terenurilor agricole dup categoriile
deintorilor de teren. Astfel, gospodriile rneti (de fermier) dein o pondere considerabil i relativ constant de cca. 29%.
Tabelul 6. Terenurile agricole dup categoriile deintorilor de teren, mii ha
2008
2240,2
Total
din care:
ntreprinderi i organizaii
2009
2010
2239,4 2236,9
2011
2012
2234,0 2233,6
858,0
38,3
668,6
29,8
307,8
867,8
38,7
672,4
30,0
303,5
871,3
39,0
661,4
29,6
313,6
866,0
38,8
662,6
29,7
316,7
868,7
38,9
653,4
29,3
325,5
n %
13,7
5,9
13,6
6,1
14,0
6,0
14,2
6,0
14,6
5,5
n %
0,3
399,9
17,9
0,3
389,6
17,4
0,3
384,6
17,1
0,3
382,7
17,0
0,2
380,5
17,0
n %
gospodrii rneti (de fermier)
n %
gospodrii anexe auxiliare (loturi pe
lng cas i grdini)
asocieri pomicole i loturi pentru
legumicultur
ali deintori de terenuri
n %
Sursa: elaborat dup informaia BNS.
63
Value Chain Development for Decent Work: A Guide for Practitioners, Government and Private Sector
Initiatives, ILO, Geneva, 2009.
97
De-a lungul ultimelor trei decenii, pieele agricole caracterizate prin valoare adugat mare au devenit mai sofisticate, consolidate i reglementate, ceea ce face mai
dificil participarea micilor productori la lanurile valorice de pe aceste piee.
Determinarea modalitilor de inserare eficient a ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii
pe pieele agricole de mare valoare necesit o nelegere aprofundat a modului n
care funcioneaz aceste piee.
Figura 3. Exemple de lanuri valorice agricole de valoare mare.
Intrri
Semine
Producie
Selectare
Procesare
Firme de
prelucrare
Uniti agricole
mici
Distribuire
i marketing
Supermarketuri
Uniti agricole
mijlocii
ngrminte
Uniti agricole
mari
Uniti agricole
mici
Agro-chimicale
Uniti agricole
mijlocii
Uniti agricole
mari
Echipamente
agricole
Intermediari /
exportatori
Uniti de
depozitare la
rece / depozite
frigorifice
Fabrici de
ambalare
(selectare,
ambalare, etc.)
Importatori /
angrositi
Companii exportatoare
ale productorilor mari
Uniti de depozitare
la rece / depozite
frigorifice
Echipamente
de irigare
Servicii
alimentare
Uniti agricole
Fabrici de ambalare
(selectare, ambalare, etc.)
Comerciani
cu amnuntul /
detailiti
98
Capitolul 5
99
n baza unui contract cu un cumprtor de ncredere, un mprumut agricultorilor sau un certificat de depozit de la o facilitare de depozitare recunoscut.
Aceast definiie a finanrii lanului valoric nu include finanarea convenional
agricol de la instituiile financiare, cum ar fi bncile, actorilor dintr-un lan fr ca s
existe o legtur direct cu acest lan valoric.
Pentru ca finanarea lanului valoric s fie reuit, lanul valoric trebuie s fie
privit ca o structur unic: un lan valoric nu reprezint un sector sau un sub-sector
economic. Acesta implic un anumit grup de productori i ali actori interdependeni
care aprovizioneaz o pia particular final.
nelegerea modului n care un lan de valori este structurat i coordonat, poate
reduce riscul i ezitarea intermediarilor financiari de a mprumuta sectorul agricol.
Figura 4 descrie diferite structuri ale lanului valoric definite n termenii relaiilor ntre
dou pri interesate: cumprtor i vnztor. Cumprtorii sunt ntreprinderile agricole prelucrtoare, exportatorii sau distribuitorii, sau, n unele cazuri, supermarketurile. Vnztorii sunt productorii agricoli sau comercianii care i vnd produsele
acestor cumprtori de-a lungul lanului.
Relaia dintre aceste dou categorii de participani la lanul valoric - cumprtori
i vnztori - poate fi descris prin urmtoarele cinci tipuri de legturi:
(i) piaa imediat sau piaa spot, unde productorii i vnd produsele, iar
preurile fluctueaz. Acest aspect este cel mai riscant din punct de vedere al stabilirii preului de pia;
(ii) contract pentru a produce i cumpra (cunoscut n contextul conceptului
de agricultur contractual);
(iii) relaii pe termen lung, de multe ori informale, caracterizate prin ncredere
sau interdependen;
(iv) investiie de capital realizat de ctre unul dintre cumprtori n beneficiul
productorului, caracterizat printr-un nivel ridicat de credibilitate i dependen;
(v) companie care a realizat integrarea vertical complet.
Cnd producia i marketingul depind de o pia spot cu preuri i cerere fluctuante, finanatorii sunt reticeni, ei prefernd un lan valoric cu o structur contractual
sau de parteneriat n care riscurile de pia pot fi mai controlate. Aceasta este zona
lor de confort.
Prin urmare, trecerea de la o relaie necontrolat dintre cumprtor-vnztor
spre una mai integrat, mbuntete perspectivele de finanare att n cadrul, ct
i nspre lanul valoric.
Deoarece producia MM din agricultur este important din considerente economice i sociale, un accent deosebit trebuie pus pe modelele care s le permit
acestora s participe pe deplin n lanuri valorice. Tabelul 7, ilustreaz organizarea
tipic a produciei i marketingului micilor proprietari - adic relaia dintre fermieri
i pia sau fermieri i sistemele mai mari. Aceast analiz ne ofer o baz pentru
elaborarea modelelor de business din lanul valoric i finanarea asociat acestora.
100
Capitolul 5
Piaa spot
Contract
agricol
Parteneriat
bazat pe relaii
Parteneriat bazat pe
investiii capitale
Integrare
vertical
Zona de confort
Vnztor
Sursa: Miller C., Jones L. Agricultural Value Chain Finance Tools and
Lessons, FAO, UN, 2010.
Productorul n
calitate de for
motric
Cumprtorul n
calitate de for
motric
Facilitatorul n
calitate de for
motric
Integrat
productori de scar
mic, n special
constituii n grupuri
cum sunt asociaiile sau
cooperativele;
- fermieri de scar mare
- procesatorii
- exportatorii
- vnztorii cu amnuntul
- comercianii, angrositii
i ali actori tradiionali
de pia
- ONG-urile i alte agenii
de suport
- Guvernul naional i
administraiile publice
locale
firme leader
supermarket-uri
companii multi-naionale
-
Argumentarea
-
Surs: elaborat dup Vorley B., Lundy M., MacGregor J., Business models that are
inclusive of small farmers, Paper prepared for FAO and UNIDO as background to the Global Agro-Industries Forum, New Delhi, 8 - 11 April 2008.
101
Modelele de business avnd n calitate de for motric productorii, sunt conduse pornind de la partea de jos a lanului. Ele pot fi de succes, dar se confrunt
cu dou dificulti majore. n primul rnd, productorii nu pot percepe nevoile pieei,
precum i cele din lan care sunt mai aproape de consumator. n al doilea rnd, productorii, de multe ori, trebuie s lupte pentru finanare cu excepia cazului n care
pot gsi parteneri puternici i / sau pot primi asisten pentru finanare.
Modelele de business avnd n calitate de for motric cumprtorii, stau la
baza multor solicitri de finanare a lanului de valori. Este de multe ori n interesul
cumprtorului de a procura un flux de produse i de a folosi finanarea ca o modalitate de a facilita i / sau de a stimula productorii, procesatorii i alii n lanul valoric
pentru a le vinde n condiii specificate. Cel mai adesea, atunci cnd este vorba de
finanare, condiiile sunt obligatorii reieind din contracte i, prin urmare, agricultura
contractual este cel mai comun model al lanului valoric bazat pe cumprtor n
calitate de for motric.
Modelele de business avnd n calitate de for motric facilitatorii, exist n
multe ri cu un sistem agricol dual n care coexist o agro-industrie dezvoltat, alturi de productorii marginalizai care triesc la nivel de subzisten. Costurile de
organizare i de instruire a micilor productori pot fi considerate prea nalte pentru a
fi preluate de o companie mare. Drept urmare, intermedierea de ctre organizaiile
de dezvoltare, att de organizaiile neguvernamentale (ONG-uri) ct i de ageniile guvernamentale, faciliteaz oportunitile pentru integrarea micilor agricultori n
lanurile valorice comerciale, finanarea devenind o caracteristic obinuit pentru o
astfel de facilitare.
n cele din urm, modelul integrat al lanului valoric, nu numai c conecteaz
productorii la ali participani n lan furnizori de factori de producie, intermediari,
procesatori, comerciani cu amnuntul i furnizori de servicii, inclusiv financiare, dar
acesta integreaz multe dintre aceste verigi prin relaii de proprietate i / sau relaii
contractuale formale. Modelul integrat are multe dintre caracteristicile celorlalte modele prezentate anterior i anume legturi strnse ntre contractele ncheiate ntre
prile implicate, conducere tehnic i conformitate strict, incluznd, de asemenea,
o structur amalgamat a fluxurilor i serviciilor din lanul valoric.
De ce este nevoie de o abordare coordonat din partea MAIA a integrrii
MM / M n potenialele LVA
Legturile de afaceri mai strnse ntre fermieri, agro-procesatori, exportatori, comerciani i angrositi, ofer un potenial semnificativ pentru creterea ocuprii forei de munc i rentabilitii economice productorilor
din mediul rural.
Zonele rurale au resurse agricole i umane valoroase nc neexploatate.
mbuntirea lanurilor valorice i eliminarea blocajelor poate pune n
valoare potenialul economic i genera locuri de munc.
ntreprinderile micro, mici i mijlocii (IMM / M) pot aproviziona lanurile
valorice i sunt surse majore de locuri de munc i venituri, n special,
102
Capitolul 5
103
Proiectele specializate pe proiectarea i finanarea LVA, sprijinite de donatorii internaionali, vizeaz aspecte izolate ale acestui subiect fr a-l
aborda conceptual i metodologic la nivel naional.
Formarea i finanarea LVA cere implicarea activ i a instituiilor naionale supreme de reglementare monetar i financiar (BNM, CNPF, Ministerul Finanelor). Eforturile acestor instituii trebuie bine orientate n
contextul unei abordri eficiente i promovate la nivel naional de MAIA
privitor la LVA.
5.6.
Concluzii i recomandri
Reconsiderarea politicii de subvenionare a agriculturii prin aplicarea
principiilor politicii agricole comune a UE. Fondul de subvenionare a productorilor agricoli trebuie s fie gestionat de o singur instituie care s
fie responsabil de eficiena sistemului de subvenii n agricultur. Msurile de subvenionare trebuie testate prin prisma analizei cost-beneficiu i
s fie evaluate printr-un sistem consistent de indicatori de performan.
Acestea nu trebuie s intervin n concurena de pia. Alocarea subveniilor trebuie transparentizat. Trebuie analizat practica UE de alocare a
subveniilor n baza plilor directe, evitnd indicatorii de producie. Msurile de subvenionare trebuie prevzute pentru o perioad medie de
timp de cel puin 3-5 ani.
Promovarea insistent la nivel de politici (MAIA) a proiectrii i implementrii n agricultura Republicii Moldova a strategiilor de dezvoltare de tip
integrat, inclusiv materializate n formarea lanurilor valorice agricole.
Promovarea insistent la nivel de politici (MAIA, BNM, Asociaia bncilor,
CNPF, Ministerul finanelor, donatori strini, etc.) a concepiei de finanare a lanurilor valorice agricole.
n scopul proiectrii lanurilor valorice agricole i raionalizrii deciziilor de
finanare a acestora, n condiiile Republicii Moldova, formulm urmtoarele recomandri:
iniiativele de constituire a LVA trebuie s fie susinute de studii de caz
consistente;
proiectarea lanului valoric trebuie s fie gestionat de actorii din lan;
selectarea partenerilor de perspectiv din punctul de vedere al dezvoltrii lanului valoric;
identificarea unui partener leader n finanarea lanului valoric;
reducerea costurilor i a riscurilor poate fi realizat prin finanarea prin
intermediul celui mai puternic actor sau actori din lan. Prin finanarea
ntreprinderilor agricole mai puternice i mai puin riscante, cel mai
adesea poziionate aproape de sfritul lanului, costurile financiare
asociate cu protecia fa de risc sunt reduse;
consolidarea capacitilor productorilor mici i altor parteneri slabi
din lan.
104
Bibliografie
REFERINE BIBLIOGRAFICE LA CAPITOLUL 1
1.
2.
3.
4.
105
19. Rodica Milena Zaharia Economia Mondial, Bucureti, editura ASE, 2004
20. Anuarul statistic al Republicii Moldova pentru anii 1995-2012, BNS
21. Balana de pli a Republicii Moldova pentru anul 2012, BNM, 28 martie 2013
22. Cartea Alb: propuneri pentru mbuntirea climatului investiional n Moldova,
Asociaia Investitorilor Strini din RM (FIA), 2009
23. Foreign direct investment and performance requirements: new evidence from selected countries, UNCTAD, 2003
24. Global investment trends monitor, UNCTAD, no. 11, 2013
25. Impactul investiiilor strine directe asupra economiei Republicii Moldova, ExpertGrup, Chiinu, 2010
26. Investing Across Borders 2010, Investment Climate Advisory Services, the World Bank
27. Investment Generation Toolkit, the World Bank/MIGA, 2011
28. Investment Policy Framework for Sustainable Development, UNCTAD, 2012
29. Legea nr. 81 din 18.03.2004 cu privire la investiiile n activitatea de ntreprinztor
30. Policy Framework for Investment, OECD, 2006
31. Strategia de atragere a investiiilor i promovare a exporturilor pentru anii 2006-2015,
aprobat prin Hotrrea Guvernului nr. 1288 din 9 noiembrie 2006
32. Web table 32a: Country rankings by Inward FDI Potential Index, 2011, UNCTAD
33. World Investment Report 2012
34. http://www.heritage.org/index/ranking
35. www.doingbusiness.org
36. https://www.wbginvestmentclimate.org
37. http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/Data/ExploreEconomies/2009/moldova
38. www.unctad.org
39. www.bnm.md
40. www.statistica.md
106
10. IMM-urile sub presiunea inegalitii cu care se aplic fiscalitatea. i angajeaz 60% din salariaii Romniei. http://economie.hotnews.ro/stiri-finante_banci14299400-imm-urile-sub-presiunea-inegalitatii-care-aplica-fiscalitatea-angajeaza60-din-salariatii-romaniei.htm
11. Joint Taxation in Denmark. BDO, 2010.
http://www.bdo.dk/Publikationer/Publikationer/Joint%20Taxation%20in%20Denmark.pdf
12. Kesti J. European Tax Handbook 2007. Amsterdam. IFBD, 2007.
13. Moldova are cea mai ridicata sarcina fiscala din CSI. http://www.noi.md/md/news_
id/16597
14. Nerudova D. Group Taxation Under The System of Common Consolidated Corporate
Tax Base // Economics & Management. 14, 2009.
15. Petutschnig M. Sharing the Group Benefits of a Common Consolidated Corporate
Tax Base within Corporate Groups // Vienna University of Economics and Business.
16. Politica fiscala pe 2010 diminueaza presiunea fiscala?
http://www.allmoldova.com/ro/experts/27.html
17. Reprezentanii mediului de afaceri i conducerea Inspectoratului Fiscal Principal de Stat: fa n fa. http://chamber.md/ro/nout%C4%83%C8%9Bi/616reprezentan%C8%9Bii-mediului-de-afaceri-%C8%99i-conducerea-inspectoratuluifiscal-principal-de-stat-fa%C8%9B%C4%83-%C3%AEn-fa%C8%9B%C4%83
18. Smith N. Group Taxation in Denmark. April 2008.
http://www.equinor.eu/pdfs/GROUPT~1.pdf.
19. Studiu IDIS: Moldova, prad a economiei subterane i a evaziunilor fiscale.
http://viitorul.org/newsview.php?l=ro&idc=132&id=3986&t=/STIRI-EVENIMENTEIDIS/Studiu-IDIS-Moldova-prada-a-economiei-subterane-si-a-evaziunilor-fiscale
20. Taxation in Japan 2010. KPMG Tax Corporation.
http://tax.kpmg.or.jp/knowledge/research/pdf/201012.pdf
21. Ting A. Australias Consolidation Regime: A Road of No Return? 2010.
http://sydney.edu.au/business/_data/assets/pdf_file/0015/72312/BTR_Article_Antony_Ting.pdf
22. Warner J.C. Practical Guide to Consolidated Returns. CCH, 2007.
23. . ., . . : .-.:
-2005.- 489 .
24. . .
: . .: , 2009.
25. . ., . .
// -2005-9 .31.
26. : ./ ., . . .- .:
2004.- 502 .
27. . http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/anticris/72362
28. ( ). http://www.inventech.ru/lib/right/right-0445/
29. ( ). http://www.bibliotekar.ru/hozyaystvennoe-pravo/157.htm
30. .., .., ...
. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_
id=2264190
31. . . : , 3-, .,
.- .: -,-2005. 618 .
32.
.
http://www.kreditbusiness.ru/
problems/1791-problemy-nalogooblozhenija-biznesa.html
107
33. . http://smb-support.
ru/6165
34. .. .//
2005-3 .17.
35. .
http://www.bank24.ru/info/glossary/?srch=%CD%C0%CB%CE%C3%CE%C2%CE
%C5+%C1%D0%C5%CC%DF
36. 40 . http://gagauzinfo.md/index.php?newsid=875
37. . . .- -/: , - 2004.-129 .
108
109
:
,
(II)
4- - 30 2013
, ,
KFW ().
: ,
, ,
,
( I);
, IDIS Viitorul, ( II);
, IDIS Viitorul, ,
( III);
, IDIS Viitorul, , ( IV);
, IDIS Viitorul, -
, ( V).
, :
, , ,
:
;
, IDIS Viitorul,
:
;
,
: ;
, Deeplace Company, IT Moldova,
: :
.
112
ANRCETI
ATM
OTP
PARE
PNAET
- (Point of sale)
UNCTAD
USD
eBanking
eCommerce
113
: ,
, .
, . , ,
97,5% , 57,7% .
() 28.3%. , , 58,4% . ,
.
, ,
, .
, 4 2008 , (Small Business Act SBA),
,
,
. " "
- ,
, .
, ,
(IEFS), 2012 , 136 27 , 27 , 73,3% ,
.
4- - , , , , . ,
. : , , . ,
,
,
.
, :
1. , . ,
.
2. ,
, ,
. , , -
114
, , , , , , .
3. , , , -, . , ,
, , , , ,
.
, ? ,
,
.
, 30 2013 , IV- - (), , KFW (),
Viitorul ( )
, . , 4
: 1. ; 2.
; 3. ; 4. : .
, , , , , , ,
.
, , .
, ,
, , ,
, IDIS Viitorul.
115
: ,
IV- - . ,
, . ,
, ,
, , , .
, , :
(10 )
(20 )
(60 )
1-2
,
;
+1
,
:
1. .
2. .
3. ,
.
4. , .
:
, , . , IDIS Viitorul ,
, , ,
, -
.
,
IDIS Viitorul
116
,
, /
. 1
, . , , , , :
1. - , ;
2. ;
3.
,
;
4. , ;
5.
;
, , .
2 . , ()
, , , , , ,
,
.
. , , , , ,
,
"",
. ,
, . ,
,
, , , -
117
: ,
- .
, ,
, , , . , , , ,
, - ,
,
. , , ,
. ,
:
, , ,
,
.
, ,
, , , , ,
,
, ;
;
, , ,
;
,
, , , .
, ;
(, , , );
, ,
.
, ,
.
(MIEPO)
.
, , ,
, , .
118
3 , . , :
1. . , , ,
, (
: , , ).
2.
, , , .
3. , , ,
, ,
.
4. ,
, ,
,
, , , .
5.
, , ,
.
, , :
,
.
( 3%);
- -
,
.
4-
. , ( ), : /, ; ;
, - ; ,
119
: ,
; - , ;
,
, .
, , - :
A. , - ( , ):
1. ,
-
. ,
.
14 -
, .
2. -
, .
, -
.
B. ,
, , . eCommerce:
1. eCommerce
( , )
.
2.
.
, , eCommerce
.
3. , ,
eCommerce.
, , , ,
.
4. (
- ),
, .
5. ,
, -
.
6. , ,
, 10 14 .
120
, 5,
, , , , . , , :
.
,
.
. . .
, .
: 3-5 .
( )
, - .
(
, , , , , .)
- .
-
, : - ; - - - ; - , - ;
- - ; - - .
,
,
; -
.
121
(),
.
,
, .
1.1.
- ,
, ,
.
, , 97,5% , 57,7% .
. - 28,3%.
58,4% , 43,4% ( 2009 .).
10 12 50%; 5 30%.
. ,
, , .
-,
, . ,
, , .
, .
122
, , .
, 2012
2012-2020 ,
, .
:
1) 1000 25 2020 ;
(14)
2) 65% 2020 ; (57)
3) 38% 2020 ; (28,3)
4) .
. 6 , :
.
.
. :
1. ;
2. ;
3. /,
.
1.2.
.
.
: 2-3 .
, ,
(. 1)
1. , %
2007
18.85
10.88
2008
20.96
12.02
123
2009
20.31
12.51
2010
16.25
9.91
2011
14.37
8.75
2012
11.98
8.32
: ,
- . 2009
(. 2). 2011
. , 91,8% 2008 .
2.
2007
, .
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
n/a
, ,
. , ,
33,6% ( 2011 ) (. 3).
3.
(% ):
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
36,9
36,5
36,0
33,3
33,6
35,1
45,0
46,1
45,4
42,8
58,2
73,9
73,4
62,4
55,9
. ,
2008 . ,
.
.
1.3.
- , .
, ( 31.12.2012 - 60
), 1 892,9 (: http://
www.cnpf.md/file/Statistica_2013/aprilie/Indicatori-OMF_31.12.2012.xls).
124
, , ,
.
- 361 1.01.2013 (: http://
www.cnpf.md/file/Entitati_Supraveghere/2013/LAEILS_01_01_2013.xls)
, ,
. 30.09.2012 363,5 . (: http://www.cnpf.md/file/Entitati_Supraveghere/
2012/ CONS_30.09.2012_AEI_357.xls).
,
. (
) , , , .
, ,
- . , .
, -, , , , .
1.4.
(
- ODIMM), , ,
. 50% , 1 . 5
2% .
70% , 500 . 5 1,5% .
50% , 2 .
5 1,5% .
16,28 . . 45 8,7 . , 24,3 . (5 ).
- PNAET PARE1+1, ODIMM.
, - PNAET
50% , 150 5
1,5% . -
PARE1+1 - 50% , 200
5 1,5% .
125
: ,
1.5.
,
.
,
, :
- (PNAET) - ,
, . ( : 2008-2013 .). ,
291 83, 4 .
33.4 .
2012 376 .
2013 32 . 267 .
-
(PARE 1+1)
( 50% , 50%
). 2010-2012 .
ODIMM 142 . , 2013 . ,
20 . .
, , , , ;
IFAD -
.
1.6.
. , 15 ,
, .
(
, ) ,
(2007 ),
(2011-2012).
.
, 2012 136 27 , 73,3% ( 4).
126
4. ,
,
%
73,3
. .
45,9
33,3
19,3
11,1
6,7
3,7
4,4
. ,
.
,
,
( 82,8% ). (38,8%)
; 33,6%
; 31,3% ,
.
17,9% , 11,2% /
, . 10,4%
. ,
2,2%
.
1.7.
, , .
. , .
127
: ,
- , , ;
, ,
, .
:
1. - ;
2. ;
3.
4.
;
5.
;
6. ;
.
, , .
, ,
, .
128
1
2
2.1.
: ,
, ,
, . - , .
. , ,
, , , ( ),
. , -,
.
. . . ,
( ), -
( - , , , ,
, .).
, ,
, , ,
. , , , , , ,
, .
,
.
,
, 97.5% -
129
: ,
, 57,7%
34,5% 28,3% .
IV- -
, , ,
. ,
, ,
, , , , ,
( 2),
( 3), , ,
( 4), , (
5), , , , , , "
",
IV- - ( 6).
2.2.
, - ,
, .
.
, , , , , ; ,
; , (, , .)1. , , .
250 2.
3:
:
, ;
, .
1
2
, , ASE, 2004
, " ", ,
2994
. ". " , , , , 2002
130
:
, ;
(),
.
:
,
, . , ,
, , ().
,
, ,
, .
, .
, 10 25%, , . , ,
, , 10%.
, , , , , ,
,
4. UNCTAD, :
, () . , 81 18.03.2004 . , (),
-
, , - , . ,
- , , . ,
,
: , , .
, : ,
. , , , ,
. . 4
, , 1999
131
: ,
, ,
. , , , . , , , ,
, . ,
,
, , 5.
1:
- ( , , );
-
.
- , , ,
- -,
- ,
-
- ( / )
: Investment Generation Toolkit, the World Bank/MIGA, 2011
. ,
, . , , , .
,
,
6. , 5
. ". " ,
, , ,
2002
Foreign direct investment and performance requirements: new evidence from selected countries,
UNCTAD, 2003
132
( , ), , 7.
- .
, ,
, , , :
, , ,
, , ,
.
.
,
, ,
.
-, . , ,
, ., ,
.
,
. ,
.
,
. , , .
, , , , . , , , .
, , , , ., , 8.
2.3.
, , ,
, , 7
Sinjaya Lall Reinventing Industrial Strategy: The Role of Government Policy in Building Industrial
Competitiveness, G-24 Discussion Paper Series, No. 28, April 2004, UNCTAD
, , " - ", "", 1 (71), 2010 .
133
: ,
,
, , , 9. ,
. , ,
, 10.
1990-2011 , 2,1 $, 20,4 $,
207 $ 1990 1,5 $ 2011 .
1/3
10% ,
10% . , 2011 , ,
, 23% ,
2007 11. , 2012 ,
1,3 $,
12. ,
, 90- ,
, ,
, 13.
2:
, $
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
1975,5
1790,7
1197,8
1309,0
1524,4
1310,4
1019,6
606,2
618,6
747,9
574,3
650,0
519,2
616,7
684,4
90,8
121,0
-
14,3
14,2
76,5
106,8
%
66,3
56,9
29,1
36,3
4,6
6,8
-
0,7
0,8
3,9
6,0
2012
1310,7
548,9
680,4
72,4
73,8
92,2
81,5
8,9
63,5
4,8
69,0
7,7
84,5
3,5
78,0
50,6
43,3
47,3
47,1
49,1
44,9
41,9
51,9
6,0
5,6
6,0
6,2
0,7
5,3
0,4
5,3
0,5
5,5
0,3
6,0
: World Investment Report 2012 i Global Investment Trends Monitor, no. 11,
2013, UNCTAD
9
10
11
12
13
134
2012 :
(51,9%),
(41,9%), 6,2% -
( 2).
,
.
4,6% 2007 ,
6,2% 2012,
- 3,9%, 6,0%.
( 83%)
, .
,
.
1: /
(2011 ) ,
$
, . 2011 904
$, 526 $
( 1). , ,
. ,
, , 14. ,
, . , (
5 1/3 ),
, ,
. 5 , 4 8 ,
, .
, . 46%, 2011 , 50%, 2010 ,
, 660 $ , 2009 ,
14
135
: ,
( 3). , 1/3
, 2008 . , ,
40% . , , , 2011 2008 .
3:
2005-2007 .
2008
,
%
$
-
-
130
670
820
41
50
230
980
1130
10
42
48
2009
170
510
630
13
39
48
2010
140
620
490
11
50
39
2011
200
660
570
14
46
40
, ,
, . , ,
, " ". ,
. , " ",
" " ,
- , , . , " ",
, ,
, , , ,
: , - , ,
,
, 15.
5 .
15
Charles-Albert Michalet Strategies of Multinationals and Competition for FDI, the IFC and the World
Bank, 1997
136
, - ,
, " " ,
.
2:
(1,3 $)
66%
-
(549 . $)
42%
(680 . $)
118%
(82 . $)
90%
,
(552 . $)
135%
(3,5 . $)
24%
(78 . $)
91%
(3,5-78 . $)
24-102%
(47 . $)
60%
(78 . $)
102%
2.4.
, 20
. 1992 ,
, (
, 4 $ 2 $ ), 2011
. , 2011 892 $ - 2,8
14,2 .
137
: ,
3:
19922011 .,
: UNCTAD
, .
UNCTAD 2012 ,
2011 12%, 777 $, , 16. ,
.
,
,
( ). , - ,
, . ,
(3163 $),
3 , , 1,5 - ,
1,6 , 1,8 - . ,
""
. , ,
(, , ), , , 4 16 .
, .
, 2011 , 3,8 ,
, 3,6 , 2
1,5 . ,
, ,
. ,
, 2011 , ,
16
138
,
.
4:
2010
,
. $)
.-
- .- -
2011 ,
2011
. $) , 2010 2010 , 2011 2011 ,
,
. $)
. $)
. $)
...
197
274
3 163
13
301
12
320
814
975
9,305
31
1 017
30
1 991
211
422
4 728
14
470
25
956
1 051
1 031
4 701
6
68
7
488
760
558
5 803
10
380
6
436
570
525
5 046
8
265
21
805
,
526
2 143
51 293
102
4 242
91
5 676
1 540
257
16 727
27
947
29
883
379
1 562
12 109
23
965
20
717
: World Investment Report 2012, UNCTAD
- ,
2004 . , ,
, , () 1995 ,
() 2000 .
. 2007 , 12% ( 4). 2007
, 17. , , - ,
.
17
, Expert-Grup,
, 2010
139
: ,
4:
, 1992-2011 .
, . $
, %
: UNCTAD
2007 ,
, .
2007 , 2008 ,
.
,
, , . , 2008 , , , , , , 2007 .
5:
, . $)
2000
2001
129,49 100,31
84,99 106,23
-2,6
47,1
2007
2002
2003
2004
2005
87,56
56,41
-36,64 -27,43
30,72 58,58
15,34
20,41
46,42
-22,83
39,33
71,63
2008
2010
2011
2012
2009
140
2006
41,59
100,16
, , ( , ) , .
, , ,
, , . , 2008 ,
, , , . 2009
, , , , 7 (
2009 .) 2,5 ( 2011 .). . ,
(2008 .), :
- 3,1 , 5,5 ,
2012 ,
, , . ,
2012 , , 27,7% - 18, . , 2012 , 3338.79
. $ ( 5), :
2568.82 . $, 769.97 . $)
5: 2011 , . $)
4 000,0
3 500,0
3 000,0
2 500,0
2 000,0
1 500,0
1 000,0
500,0
0,0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2012
(52,7%) . , , SPE (Special
Purpose Entity ),
. 25%
-, , . . 11,6%
18
2012 , , 28 2013 .
141
: ,
, 35,7%19.
, , 190 . $, ,
, ,
. ,
150 . $, 145 . $, , 140
. $.
, , . ,
. ,
2008 19,8%
, 2012 27,7%, . , ,
(Groupe Socit
Generale, Gruppo Veneto Banca, Erste Bank, Pro Credit, Raiffeisen .).
, , 4 19,1% 23,5%. Lafarge ( ), Knauf ( ),
Sudzuker ( ), Draexlmaier Lear Corporation (
), Lactalis Group Efes (
) .. ,
( , ),
( ), (
).
23,3% 2008 16,8% 2012 .
Metro, Lukoil, Mabanaft, Petrom, Rompetrol ..
, , , ,
2007-2008
. , ,
,
, ( 75% ). , . .
, ,
. ,
. ,
.
, ( ), , Orange, Moldcell, Lafarge, 20.
19
20
2012 , , 28 2013 .
, , 4 (60) 2007 .
142
, 6:
, , 3, 2012 . (
2004 , ) 2008 . ( )
,
,
-
3,5%
1,4%
1,7%
6,8%
. , -
, ,
27,7%
8,6%
,
6.
, ,
,
; 10,0%
23,5%
16,8%
,
,
2,0%
1,1%
1,9%
6,1%
19,8%
,
2011
12,0%
2006
58%,
,
,
;
14,7%
23,3%
19,1%
32%, (
:
) 29%.
, , , (65%), , . , 17%,
12%, - 17%. , ,
( 56%), (9%),
, , ( 16%). ,
143
: ,
,
,
.
2011
2011
,
2006, %
, %
, %
, %
6: ,
, , 2011
, 2006
32
34
-11
77
32.889
43570 32
305631
36
33
-16
75
1.174
1.856 58
11.614
13.643
17
2.878
3.710
29
65
56
138
1.479
1.911 29
15.475
12.844 -17
4.203
3.787 -10
32
49
2006
2011
2006
2011
2006
, , 21
,
, ASEM, , 2007 .
144
7:
, 2011 2006
, %
2006 2011
20062011
.
98,3
97,5
91,0
, %
, %
, %
2006
2006 20062011 .
2011 .
2006 2011
20062011
.
97,9
57,9
57,7
58,4
46,2
34,6
39,8
35,2
35,9
36,5
89,8
90,3
53,2
52,5
53,3
40,2
31,0
35,4
32,1
32,7
33,4
3,2
3,8
3,6
2,0
2,7
2,5
2,5
1,8
2,1
0,2
2,0
1,2
4,1
3,9
4,0
2,7
2,5
2,6
3,6
1,8
2,4
3,0
1,3
1,9
145
: ,
8:
-
-
67
88
106
2,2%
2,4%
2,7%
1,7%
3,1%
2,7%
222 259 273
7,2%
7,1%
7,0%
5,7%
6,2%
5,8%
66
73
79
2,1%
2,0%
2,0%
3,0%
1,0%
1,1%
45
55
59
1,5%
1,5%
1,5%
1,0%
1,2%
1,0%
:
36% , .
2006-2011 1,2%, - 1,9%. ,
,
: . , ,
2011 , 13%
,
17%.
,
, , . , , , .
, 2008-2011 , 26%, ( 84%) . ,
( ) 15%, - 20%
- 23%.
,
58% ( , ,
26%), , . , , , , -
146
( ),
, .
31%.
(3877 2011 )
, ,
(3270),
/ 1420, 531 - .
, , , ,
, 2 ( , , ).
2008-2011 86-87% , - 6%, ( )
- 5% , 1%
. ,
, . ,
2011 57% 2008 ,
157%.
, ,
(158%). 2011 165% 2008 ,
(207%), (249%). ,
, , ,
,
.
, ,
, , , -
. ,
,
. (,
, ), , ( , , , )
, ,
, ( ,
).
90- .
( , ), ,
, , , .
-
147
: ,
7:
2.5.
, , , , , ,
,
, .
, , , , , ,
,
(, , ) ,
22. , , :
( );
( ,
, , ).
, , , ,
, .
, , .
, ,
. 22
148
,
. , .
, , ,
, , ,
, ,
, , , ,
, ,
.
,
23. , , ,
24:
, ;
,
, , ;
;
;
,
. .
;
, , ;
, .
, , , . - , , 25:
;
, ;
, () ;
23
24
25
,
" ", 5, 2001
, , "", 3, 2006
-: , " (FIA), 2009 .
149
: ,
;
, ;
, ;
,
; ; ,
;
- , - ;
..
, ,
( 9). ,
, , , , .
, , , .
, ,
, .
9:
, %
, %
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
8,0
21,0
24,0
21,9
2,3
-33,5
22,6
11,8
97,3
30,8
35,1
109,7
31,4
-79,6
35,9
39,1
, , , ,
, , 26. 26
, , 29-30 2010
150
10: ,
, 2011
- -
78
96
114
123
133
118
88
92
128
136
34
7
52
56
27
113
92
38
140
129
29
86
63
97
75
74
80
83
127
104
55
73
77
100
80
109
79
90
132
122
97
85
21
102
81
114
87
84
130
130
: Web table 32a: Country rankings by Inward FDI Potential Index, 2011, UNCTAD
. , , , .
, , "27. , , ,
: ; ; ; (
1000 1000 ); ; -
; ; ;
;
;
; 28. , UNCTAD, 2011 122
177 , 29.
, (, , , ). , ,
27
28
29
-
, .
: , , , , 2004
Astrtit Sulstarova FDI performance and potential rankings, Division on Investment and Enterprise,
UNCTAD
Web table 32a: Country rankings by Inward FDI Potential Index, 2011, UNCTAD
151
: ,
, ,
( 2011
1,8 , , 2,6 , , 1,6
, ). , ,
.
,
(Enterprise Surveys 2009),
, 30. , Heritage Foundation. , 2013 , 115 185 ,
" ". , 43
, - 38, - 58. , , 129-141 12 ,
- 27-36 , 56-73 , 74-80, 17-26, 2-9 31. , Doing
Business 2013 , , 83
185 , 82
. , , . - 9 ( 19 ); -
23 ( 19 ); - 32 ( 25
); - 85 ( 17 ). , , ,
. ,
(, , ),
, , , , (, ,
). .
, ,
, , , , , , .
,
.
.
,
. ,
(Investment Climate Advisory Services)
2010 , , . ,
, . 30
31
http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/Data/ExploreEconomies/2009/moldova
http://www.heritage.org/index/
152
11: ,
- Doing Business
Doing
()
Business
UNCTAD
123
136
27
129
75
104
80
122
81
130
85
32
58
36
21
9
25
83
35
23
17
25
82
32
70
19
70
82
17
19
-
-
2011 , $
58
38
153
41
13
21
55
115
76
43
1462
1628
1359
20384
16437
2149
5398
892
7442
2291
:
UNCTAD, Doing Business,
Heritage Foundation, UNCTAD
, , ,
32.
, , -
( , , ) 2006-2015 .,
, , , . , , ,
,
33. ,
, , , . ,
, , , , , ,
32
33
Investing Across Borders 2010, Investment Climate Advisory Services, the World Bank
2006-2015 ., II, . 22
153
: ,
, ;
,
, ; , , ; ,
,
; , 34.
, 7 , , , , ,
,
, ,
" " .
.
2.6.
, , , , ,
"",
. , ,
. ,
, , , ,
- 35.
, ,
, , , . , ,
,
, , - ,
, . , ,
34
35
2006-2015 ., II, . 50
Holger Gorg, David Greenaway Much Ado about Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from
FDI?, the World Bank Research Observer, vol. 19, no. 2
154
,
. ,
:
, , ,
,
.
, ,
, , , , ,
,
, ;
.
, , ,
;
,
, , , .
, ;
(, , , );
, ,
.
, ,
.
(MIEPO)
.
, , ,
, , .
, , ,
.
,
,
. ,
, IV- -
. , ,
, , , .
155
: ,
, , . : ( ,
, , ,
);
(PARE 1+1, PNAET) - ; , ;
, , ; - ; (
, , ) ;
, ; . , :
, ,
;
;
;
;
;
;
, ;
8
, .
156
3
4
3.1.
"". ,
36. , , " "
43% , 30%. " " 37.
: , () 2030% , (,
, ) (, , ,
) ,
. (
) ,
.
. , ,
, , ,
60% .38
- ,
.
, IV- -
.
, , , , ,
, . , , ,
, ,
.
, 36
37
38
. http://www.jurnal.md/ro/news/evaluarea-niveluluieconomiei-tenebre-in-moldova-529696/
2010 ? http://www.allmoldova.com/ro/experts/27.
html
60% . http://economie.hotnews.ro/stiri-finante_banci-14299400-imm-urile-sub-presiunea-inegalitatiicare-aplica-fiscalitatea-angajeaza-60-din-salariatii-romaniei.htm
157
: ,
, .
,
. , .
, ,
IV- - 30 2013 .
, , :
1. ( )
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
3.2.
,
39. , , ,
, . ,
. 40.
1. 41
,
39
40
41
, ,
158
3
4
42. ,
, , ()
(). , , , , , .
,
43.
,
, .
,
44. .
.
, 45.
,
, :
,
, , , .;
,
( )
;
;
, , , 46.
42
43
44
45
46
Brooks K. International and EC Tax Aspects of Groups of Companies. Canada. IFBD, 2008.
Kesti J. European Tax Handbook 2007. Amsterdam. IFBD, 2007.
. ., . . // -2005-9 .31.
. . : . .: , 2009.
: ./ ., . . .- .: 2004.- 502 .
159
: ,
.
2012-2020 . ( 685 13.09.2012 .) , , ,
, , .
, , , , , .
47.
3.3.
, , : -
,
(, , .) ,
48:
();
();
();
();
();
;
.
( ),
, .
49:
;
;
, .
47
48
49
.. .//
2005-3 .17.
E. . - , 2008 .
E. . - , 2008 .
160
3
4
, ,
:
I. ( );
II. ;
III. , ;
IV. - ().
I. .
,
, .
. ,
( , ).
,
, (),
.
( )
, ,
. .
,
(), .
.
.
:
;
, , ;
,
;
;
, (, );
,
( , ,
) (
) ;
() , ,
161
: ,
( , , , , , IDNP).
II. , .
, , (
, .), ,
. ,
, 2 ,
, .
,
, . ,
.
III. ,
, , , .
,
( , , ), 30-
.
, 30- ( )
IV. - () - , .
, , ,
- ,
, .
-
( 5 474
28 1998 - ), ,
- .
, , , . 254 1163-XIII 24.04.1997 .
162
3
4
, ,
, .
3.4.
. .2 ,
, , , , , 50.
, , , (1) , (2) (3) .
,
, 51.
, ,
52.
.
,
.
, , . .6 , (1)
(2) (. 2).
, , . -
.
, . ,
, .
50
51
52
. Nr.1163-XIII 24.04.97 .
E. . - , 2008 .
. http://www.kreditbusiness.ru/problems/1791-problemynalogooblozhenija-biznesa.html
163
: ,
2. 53
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
53
1.
2.
3.
-
4.
5.
6. /
7.
8.
9.
10.
,
()
11. ;
12.
13.
14. /
15.
16.
. Nr.1163-XIII 24.04.97 .
164
3
4
, ( ) ( 3).
3. 54
( )
.
() (), .
, , ,
,
.
3.5.
.
. , .
. , ( ),
. ,
. , 54
E. . , 2008 .
165
: ,
.
55:
1.
;
2. .
, ,
, , , , . ,
. , ,
, .
,
:
;
;
;
.
.
( ,
.)
3.6.
206-XVI 7.07.2006 .,
, ,
, .
, 71 II ( 1163-XIII 24.04.1997 .), :
(1) , , ()
(2) (1) , 31 , ,
100000 , , .
55
E. . - , 2008 .
166
3
4
1: ,
49
249
3 - 3
25 25
50 50
: .2
206-XVI 7 2006 .
(3) (1) , 31 , ,
100000 600000 , ,
,
.
(4) ,
,
.
(5) , , ,
, , (4) 113.
(6) , , , , 6 .
,
.
3% .
. , .
31 , . .
167
: ,
3.7.
, , ( ) (, , ), , ,
, 56.
,
(), ,
().
1)
+ +
( ), ,
, .
, :
- "" :
2)
, ,
- "" :
3)
, ,
, , , ,
, ,
.
, , () ,
.
(),
:
4)
56
. (- ). , 2007. .
168
3
4
, " ,
( ), ,
". , , , , ,
, ,
-
. , ,
,
.
,
57:
, " ", (,
) ;
, , , ,
;
, ,
;
,
.
, ,
.
, ,
1974 , 1776 , .
, ,
,
( ) ,
, , .
( 4), , , , , ,
100- .
57
. - .
. , 2003.
169
: ,
4. 58
K :
, ,
, ,
, , , , , , ,
, .
,
, , , ,
,
.
3.8.
,
:
: 2:
, %
,
31,2
, 44,2
-
54,1
. -
( ,
55,4
) -
43,1
: Total tax rate (% of commercial profits).
(,
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/
,
IC.TAX.TOTL.CP.ZS?display=default
) .
58
. (- ). , 2007. .
170
3
4
, ,
, / :
3:
12
3*
16
16
20
13
19
0**
20
24
20
20
20
24
20
20
: Corporate tax rates table. http://www.kpmg.com/global/en/services/tax/tax-tools-and-resources/pages/corporate-tax-rates-table.aspx i Ukraine: Tax holiday for SMEs from April 2011. http://www.gw-world.com/en/ostnews-article/
ostnews-nr-88/ukraine-tax-holiday-for-smes-from-april-2011/
* () 7%.
** 2011 2015 .
, ( ),
(, ) , ,
. , ,
( ), ,
.
, Doing Business 2013,
International Finance Corporation , ,
. ,
, .
, ,
- . ,
, :
(32,5%), ( 29,6%), (29,4%).
. 1997
32%, 2009
36,5%. ,
11 ,.
, 2010 ,
1999-2007 .. , 68,8% ,
68,1% 63,3%.
171
: ,
3.9.
,
:
, ,
, ,
( )
, , , . , ,
, 100.000
, , ,
.
2010-2011 ,
:
,
( , .)
59
IDIS: , . http://viitorul.org/
newsview.php?l=ro&idc=132&id=3986&t=/STIRI-EVENIMENTE-IDIS/Studiu-IDIS-Moldova-pradaa-economiei-subterane-si-a-evaziunilor-fiscale
172
3
4
,
,
( , ),
(
). , , :
, , , , ;
, ;
.
, . ,
- , , , , ,
, - ,
, .
3 %- ,
:
, 71 ( II)
,
206-XVI 7 2006 .
, , , .
, , :
1. ;
2.
.
,
:
- ,
,
, (
, );
- - ( , 5-7 )
;
- , .
173
: ,
, ,
60. ,
:
() 3.000.000 ,
10 ,
, (3,5%) (23%) ,
.
20% 80% , . 80% ,
65%, 50%.
, ,
60%
( 2013 2310 ),
. , ,
,
.
3.10.
, ,
:
1. . ,
(
: , , ).
2.
,
.
3. , , ,
, ,
.
4.
, 60
40 . http://gagauzinfo.md/index.
php?newsid=875
174
3
4
,
, , , .
5.
, .
, :
- ,
.
( 3%);
- - -
,
.
, , - , :
I.
. , , .
, ,
, .
II.
.
, ,
, , ,
.
III. ,
( ).
.
IV. . ,
, , , . , 12%
. ,
, .
V.
. .
175
: ,
, , .
, ,
, .
.
, .
, , ,
: , , , , , 1991-1994 ., , ,
,
() .
, ,
, .
, , . , ,
.
, ,
, . , .
176
3
4
4.1.
. , , , , , , , . , ,
.
eBanking?
eBanking, ,
( , , ..). .
:
. - 24 ,
,
.
.
- .
,
.
.
,
:
.
-
.
/, , .
177
: ,
4.2.
,
1: ,
- :
, % 16 74
2010
2011
2012
-
(27 )
36
37
40
.
23
30
34
,
43
45
45
65
68
68
,
27
28
32
.
50
51
54
18
20
21
3
4
3
33
34
40
75
78
79
,
45
:
52
( -
) :
.
eBusiness ,
- eBanking.
: - ( PC Banking), Mobile Banking
( , , SMS Banking), ATM (Automated Teller
Machine)-, -.
- .
:
:
, Excel, PDF
M-banking, E-banking .
:
,
, ,
.
178
, 79%, 68%,
.
- 40
. , , 3% -.
,
, : Mobile Banking SMS Banking . , .
Mobile Banking :
, , ,
Peer to Peer
SMS Banking Mobile Banking, ,
,
SMS.
, , , .
OTP (one time password),
. OTP ,
. ,
, OTP , -
mobile banking. ,
SMS.
.
179
: ,
SMS Banking , ,
, . .
,
, , , .
SMS:
( , )
,
OTP ( )
, ,
, ,
PIN-.
().
eCommerce.
,
. .
, 2:
, %
76%
2010
2011
2012
, 70
73
76
- (27 )
61
67
65
,
-
82
83
85
54% -
68
71
75
,
59
64
68
74
76
80
35%,
59
62
63
3 .
42
47
54
eCommerce, ,
67
71
75
88
91
92
-
80
83
87
.
, :
-
180
.
.
eCommerce 24%
,
20%
, , 19%
. ,
15%
. 4 %
eCommerce.
4.3.
3:
, %
2010
14
13
19
18
11
5
11
4
11
16
18
2011
14
14
25
17
11
5
10
3
16
18
19
2012
15
14
24
17
14
6
13
4
12
19
20
, ,
. eBanking-,
eCommerce.
1:
, %
, %
: ANRCETI
181
: ,
, 2012 , 417 .
. , 20,6 . , 388,7 . - . ,
. , . ,
, ,
2010-2012 .
- . 2012
178 , 154 . - , 24 . - .
4: ,
/
2011
2012
24094
19.741
105.072
154.365
124.813
178.459
: ANRCETI
182
, , , 29,6%, ,
, .
, , , , 76% . ,
, .
4.4.
, , ,
.
, 2012 , 38300 , 9600 4500 - . , 49,4
, 50,7 . - 77,5% - ( 9 , 3
).
, ( ) , , :
/, ,
;
, - ,
, ,
- , ,
,
,
.
, ,
.
, eBanking.
, -, :
MDL,
,
183
: ,
, , / - , , .
eCommerce, , , 50% , /
eCommerce. ,
.
, ,
eCommerce , ,
, .
, -, ,
, ,
, , . , .
, , .
, , . , eCommerce,
, .
4.5.
eBanking
:
-
( SMS Banking)
ATM
-
,
14 -
, 10 14 - .
, - ,
22% -, 60 % . 6%
-.
, . , :
184
5: , :
-
-
() -
-
14 14
14 14
2 14
14 14
10 14
7 14
13 14
12 14
2 14
-, 6 , 100 250 .
0 100 , 50 .
, , , 2-4 , - 0 - 3
.
, ,
5-6 , - 3 - 5 .
,
eBanking- , ( ) , . ,
eBanking.
Mobile banking ,
,
eBanking- . , - ,
2 .
Mobile Banking- , , - ,
.
185
: ,
SMS banking ,
,
eBanking-
.
. , .
(MasterCard
VISA). , . , , 60-70% ,
, .
, .
, , . , - MoldCard System, 1996 ,
, ,
,
.
, ,
. , , ,
, .
4.6.
-
40 % -
. , eGovernance,
, , -
.
,
. ,
. . 6% , ,
.
: ,
, . , ,
, , . , , ,
186
" ", , , ,
.
, , ,
" ", ,
.
, ,
, ,
. , , , , , , ,
, , ,
,
. , "" . , eBanking- ,
(dbf, xml, vcf
1C, SAP .) ,
.
, - , ,
.
,
. ,
( )
. ,
, ,
, . , ,
.
- ,
- , ,
.
,
. , , , , . - ,
, ,
,
,
. ,
,
, ..
187
: ,
, ,
. , - , . , , ,
.
, eCommerce , , , .
. ,
. , , eCommerce .
,
, , . eCommerce . , ,
, // .
2 7 . , (VizaCard MasterCard),
. , /
/.
.
, .
fast pay ,
, .
,
, . .
.
, ,
. ,
.
-
:
A. ,
- ( , ):
188
:
1. , - .
, . 14
- , .
2. -
, .
, -
.
D. , , , . eCommerce:
:
1. eCommerce ( , ) .
2.
. , , eCommerce .
3. , , eCommerce.
, , , ,
.
4. (
- ), , .
5. ,
, - .
6. , , , 10 14
- .
189
: ,
5.1.
. , ,
,
.
,
. ,
, .
,
, .
, , -
. , , , , , , .
, ,
, .
,
,
.
,
, - ,
" "61.
IV- -
, , .
61
World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development, The World Bank, Washington D.C.
190
5.2.
, 2011 5%. ,
. , -
,
.
519882 211759
50681
: (+) / (-), .
1.
, 2011
4707
16184
19307
26547
2538
47970
7258
101
660
976
1440
49444
300223
73057
1084
16095
18565
26066
2477
36246
4930
-53
659
937
1418
1538
87577
24892
394
99
910
599
222
17728
2283
29
129
93
9570
122214
38344
716
907
5333
3958
864
14824
2262
-42
50
423
432
38336
90432
9821
-25
15089
12322
21509
1391
3694
385
-41
607
385
893
:
.
191
: ,
, , 9%,
3,4%, 2%.
2011 97,6% 97,6% ( 1).
,
2011 9,0%, 34,9%, 56,1%.
, , 206
07.07.2006 ,
-, .
, : ,
9 , 3 , 3 .
, : ,
49 , 25 , 25 , ,
"" .
1.
, , 2011 .
1000
numrul de ntreprinderi
care
nu au
893
venituri
din
vnzri
900
,
800
249
numrul de ntreprinderi
care
au
obinut profit
, 700
607
50
numrul de ntreprinderi
care
au
600
suportat pierderi
, 500
423 432
50 ,
385
400
, 300
200
""
129
" " .
93
100
50
2
0
,
ntreprinderi
ntreprinderi
ntreprinderi
m ijlocii
m ici
m icro
192
5.3.
, , , .
, . , .
, , ,
, , .
( , ), , .
, , ,
. ,
.
:
, ;
;
,
193
: ,
. ,
, ;
( ,
);
, ;
;
, ,
.
, ,
.
, ,
, . ,
, , . , ,
, ,
, .
, , , .
.
, , , ?
, : ,
( )
. , , , , ,
. , "
".
, , . ,
, , .
:
, , ,
194
. . , ,
,
.
, , , .
, , .
,
.
, .
, , ( ),
.
(,),
, .
, , , ,
, - , , ,
.
,
.
, , ,
,
. , -,
, .
, , ,
- ,
. , ,
, ,
. , ,
.
,
,
195
: ,
. , ,
. , :
. : a) b) ,
. " " ,
. ,
, ,
. ,
.
,
. ,
,
, , ,
.
.
, .
, , . ,
. ,
, , ,
, . , ,
.
. ,
, , ,
, . ,
,
.
. . , ,
, .
196
,
. " " (
)
, , . , ,
,
.
, , ,
.
5.4.
, , , . 2
.
2: ,
, , 2007-2012
., . .
, .
,
,
, 20072012 ., . .
, %
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
1228,3
1243,6
1034,0
857,8
843,4
1272,8
2,30
1,98
1,71
1,19
1,03
1,45
: .
2007-2012 . 22415,6 35373.5 . (157,81%), 2007 - 2011 . ( 31,34%), 2012 . 3,6% 2007 . ,
2007 2011 2 : 2,3%
2007 , 1,03% 2011 , 1,45% 2012 .
197
: ,
,
. ,
, -
, Moldresurse, .
, 2010 60 04.02.2010 .
(AIPA). ,
, , ,
,
.
3 , . .
3: ,
.
2006
256,0
,
247,7
,
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
465,3
270,0
563,5
400,0
400,0
546,8
533,2
560,5
400,0
400,0
: , www.aipa.md,
, www.maia.gov.md.
2011
(10 )
,
198
2012
(8 )
2013
(10 )
2010
(8 )
2011
2012
(10 )
(8 )
-
-
-
-
( ,
, )
( ,
, )
-
,
, - ,
.
,
.
-
-
199
5
2013
(10 )
( ,
, )
,
, .
: ,
2010
(8 )
2011
(10 )
2012
(8 )
()
( )
-
2013
(10 )
: .
2
(
). ,
5 , ,
(41%).
. : -
; -
;
-
.
2.
, 2012 , %
M7
3%
M6
4%
M8
11%
M1
10%
M2
9%
M5
41%
M3
19%
M4
3%
200
3 "
" 19% . , . , .
8
" " (11%). ,
,
.
.
- ,
(67% ), 22%
.
-
, %
118214525
2063
79427202
47
22
99,57 67,19
2004
87
378603818
28169434
1968 239466488
83 15302415
45
2
67
4
98,20 63,25
95,40 54,32
152
21491542
13947549
96,71 64,90
116
4431
13655288
560134607
114
7959724
4375 356103377
3
100
2
100
98,28 58,29
98,74 63,57
147
/ , %
- , %
2072
, / , , %
5.
, 2012
: .
2012 38501 ,
121680 , -184366 .
201
: ,
:
.
.
,
, 62.
, .
,
, .
,
, , , .
,
, , .
,
, .
5.5.
-
() -
-,
- ,
, , , , ,
. , ,
, , ( , ).
,
. "- " ,
( , ,
, , ).
- ,
63.
62
30 02.08.2011 .
63
Value Chain Development for Decent Work: A Guide for Practitioners, Government and Private
Sector Initiatives, ILO, Geneva, 2009.
202
, ,
- ,
.
, , ,
.
-
6,
. , ( )
29%.
6. , .
:
%
()
%
( )
%
%
%
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2240,2
2239,4
2236,9
2234,0
2233,6
858,0
38,3
867,8
38,7
871,3
39,0
866,0
38,8
868,7
38,9
668,6
672,4
661,4
662,6
653,4
29,8
30,0
29,6
29,7
29,3
307,8
303,5
313,6
316,7
325,5
13,7
13,6
14,0
14,2
14,6
5,9
6,1
6,0
6,0
5,5
0,3
399,9
17,9
0,3
389,6
17,4
0,3
384,6
17,1
0,3
382,7
17,0
0,2
380,5
17,0
: .
, ,
, ,
,
- .
, .
, ,
203
: ,
,
- , (, ). , ,
, . . ,
,
. ,
, , . 3
- .
, , , (DFID, ), (GIZ), (USAID)
(UNIDO)
, -
.
.
,
, - . - :
a) - ;
b) - ;
c) ;
d) - .
- ,
.
, .
. ,
.
-
: , -
204
.
- , - , - .
3.
- .
(,
.)
(,
.)
205
: ,
- ,
, : -
. ,
, .
- :
. 4 - , ,
- .
,
, , . , .
- - , :
(i) -, , . - - ;
(ii) ( );
(iii) , ,
;
(iv) , ;
(v) , .
4.
-
: Miller C., Jones L. Agricultural Value Chain Finance Tools and Lessons, FAO,
UN, 2010.
206
, , -
, .
.
,
,
, - .
, , - . 7
- , . - -
.
7. -
- ,
,
;
-
-
- -
-
- ,
-
-
- -
-
-
- ;
- ;
-
-
-
-
-
- "
"
-
-
-
: Vorley B., Lundy M., MacGregor J., Business models that are
inclusive of small farmers, Paper prepared for FAO and UNIDO as background
to the Global Agro-Industries Forum, New Delhi, 8 - 11 April 2008.
. ,
207
: ,
. ,
, , . -, , , /
.
- . , -
. , ,
, -
, .
,
, , .
, - . ,
(),
, - ,
.
, - ,
- , , ,
,
/ . ,
- ,
, , ,
- .
?
, ,
, .
, . - .
-, , - , -
208
, . / - , ,
.
/ - ,
, - .
- ,
, , ,
, .
- .
,
, ,
.
, , - , .
- ,
.
: ,
.
, , , , ,
.
,
.
-
.
, , .
, , , , .
,
, ,
209
: ,
5.6.
,
.
(, , ). ,
, , , ,
.
.
, .
.
.
. ,
.
: 3-5 .
( )
,
- .
(
, , ,
, , .) - .
- , :
;
-
;
, - ;
- - ;
210
- .
,
, ;
.
211
1. , www.statistica.md
2. 2010,
3. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator
4. http://www.cnpf.md/file/Statistica_2013
1. . ". " ,
, , , 2002
2.
,
, "", 3, 2006
3. , ,
29-30 2010
4. " ", . , , 2003 .
5. , " ", , 2994
6. " ", "",
1998
7.
, , ASEM, , 2007 .
8. , "", 4 (56), 2006 .
9.
, "" 2 (66) 2009
10. , , " - ",
"", 1 (71), 2010 .
11. Holger Gorg, David Greenaway Much Ado about Nothing? Do Domestic Firms
Really Benefit from FDI?, the World Bank Research Observer, vol. 19, no. 2
12. Sinjaya Lall Reinventing Industrial Strategy: The Role of Government Policy in
Building Industrial Competitiveness, G-24 Discussion Paper Series, No. 28, April
2004, UNCTAD
212
13. , , 1999
14. Charles-Albert Michalet Strategies of Multinationals and Competition for FDI, the
IFC and the World Bank, 1997
15.
, , 4 (60) 2007 .
16. - , .
: , , , , 2004
17. Astrtit Sulstarova FDI performance and potential rankings, Division on Investment
and Enterprise, UNCTAD
18.
, " ", 5, 2001
19. , , ASE,
2004
20. 1995-2012 ,
21. 2012 , , 28 2013 .
22. -: , " (FIA), 2009 .
23. Foreign direct investment and performance requirements: new evidence from
selected countries, UNCTAD, 2003
24. Global investment trends monitor, UNCTAD, no. 11, 2013
25. , Expert-Grup, , 2010
26. Investing Across Borders 2010, Investment Climate Advisory Services, the World Bank
27. Investment Generation Toolkit, the World Bank/MIGA, 2011
28. Investment Policy Framework for Sustainable Development, UNCTAD, 2012
29. 81 18.03.2004
30. Policy Framework for Investment, OECD, 2006
31. 2006-2015 .,
1288 13.10.2006 .
32. Web table 32a: Country rankings by Inward FDI Potential Index, 2011, UNCTAD
33. World Investment Report 2012
34. http://www.heritage.org/index/ranking
35. www.doingbusiness.org
36. https://www.wbginvestmentclimate.org
37. http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/Data/ExploreEconomies/2009/moldova
38. www.unctad.org
39. www.bnm.md
40. www.statistica.md
213
1. . Nr.1163XIII 24.04.97 .
2. 206-XVI
7.07.2006 .
3. 474 28 1998
-
.
4. E. . - , 2008 .
5. Brooks K. International and EC Tax Aspects of Groups of Companies. Canada. IFBD,
2008.
6. . - . . , 2003.
7. . http://www.jurnal.md/ro/news/
evaluarea-nivelului-economiei-tenebre-in-moldova-529696/
8. . ( ). , 2007.
.
9. Greenwoods & Freehills guide to Tax consolidation for corporate groups in
Australia. 2005. http://www.gf.com.au/spb42329_internals.pdf.
10. 60% . http://economie.hotnews.ro/stiri-finante_banci14299400-imm-urile-sub-presiunea-inegalitatii-care-aplica-fiscalitatea-angajeaza60-din-salariatii-romaniei.htm
11. Joint Taxation in Denmark. BDO, 2010. http://www.bdo.dk/Publikationer/
Publikationer/Joint%20Taxation%20in%20Denmark.pdf
12. Kesti J. European Tax Handbook 2007. Amsterdam. IFBD, 2007.
13. - . http://www.noi.
md/md/news_id/16597
14. Nerudova D. Group Taxation Under The System of Common Consolidated
Corporate Tax Base // Economics & Management. 14, 2009.
15. Petutschnig M. Sharing the Group Benefits of a Common Consolidated Corporate
Tax Base within Corporate Groups // Vienna University of Economics and Business.
16. 2010 ? http://www.
allmoldova.com/ro/experts/27.html
17. : . http://chamber.md/ro/
nout%C4%83%C8%9Bi/616-reprezentan%C8%9Bii-mediului-de-afaceri%C8%99i-conducerea-inspectoratului-fiscal-principal-de-stat-fa%C8%9B%C4%83%C3%AEn-fa%C8%9B%C4%83
214
215
1. IDIS Viitorul,
: , , 2012
2. www.statistica.md
3. www.anrceti.md
4. www.bnm.md
5. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
6. www.bcr.md
7. www.maib.md
8. www.vitoriabank.md
9. www.ecb.md
10. www.socbank.md
11. www.fincombank.md
12. www.procreditbank.md
13. www.mobiasbanca.md
14. www.eximbank.md
15. www.comertbank.md
16. www.moldindconbank.md
17. www.bem.md
18. www.unibank.md
19. www.energbank.md
1. 206-XVI 7
2006 .
2. 243-XV 08.07.2004 .
3. . . : International Scientific and Practical Conferance, Economic Growth in
Conditions of Internationalization, V - th edition, vol.I, october 21-22, 2010. Chiinau,
2010, pag. 437-439.
4. Chapman, R., Slaymaker, T. ICTs and Rural Development: review of the Literature,
Current Interventions and Opportunities for Action. In Working Paper No. 192,
Overseas Development Institute, London, 2002.
5. Eastwood, R., Lipton M., Newell A. Farm Size. In Handbook of Agricultural Economics,
Vol. 4, ed. Robert Evenson and Prabhu Pingali. Amsterdam: North Holland, 2010.
6. Fan, Shenggen, A New Approach to Halving Hunger, 2008. http://www.new-ag.info/
en/view/point.php?a=1795.
216
217
FINANCING OF SMALL-SCALE
AND MEDIUM-SCALE ENTERPRISES
IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA:
CHALLENGES, TRENDS
AND FUTURE PROSPECTS
(II)
Study performed based on discussions within the 4th MoldovanGerman Forum, April 30, 2013, regarding financing small and
medium-sized enterprises
Opinions expressed in this study reflect the experts opinion
and does not necessarily reflect the donors opinion.
IDIS "Viitorul" expresses sincere thanks for the support in
developing this editin to representatives of the German Ministry
of Finance and the KfW Bank (Germany).
Authors of chapters:
220
Acronyms
ANRCETI
ATM
NBM
BNS
TNCs
Transnational Companies
IMF
SMEs
FDI
IB
Internet Banking
WTO
OTP
PARE
PNAET
Republic of Moldova
EU
European Union
UNCTAD
USD
USA dollar
FEZ
eBanking
eCommerce
221
Introduction
The importance of SMEs for the Moldovan economy is recognized and confirmed by both economists and policy makers. Currently, the SMEs have the largest share in the private sector, providing employment and creating added value.
Thus, according to the National Bureau of Statistics data, the SMEs account for
97.5% of the total of enterprises in the Republic of Moldova while about 57.7%
of the national economy labor force is employed in SMEs. In the Republic of
Moldova, SMEs share in the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is about 28.3%. For
comparison in the European Union the average share of SMEs in GDP is about
58.4%. Obviously, there is still much to be done in this field in our country.
In that context, we may underline that the European Commission does its
best to ensure a favorable environment for the growth and development of SMEs.
Thus, the Small Business Act (SBA) adopted on the 4 of June 2008 recognizes
the central role of SMEs in the EU economy. It emphasizes their significance in
ensuring the innovation process and economic and social cohesion as well. It
aims to improve the overall approach to entrepreneurship, permanently anchor
the Think Small First principle in policy making and to promote SMEs growth by
helping them tackle the problems that hamper their development.
According to the data of the survey conducted by the Institute of Economy,
Finance and Statistics (IEFS) in 2012, about 73.3% of the respondents out of 136
entrepreneurs interviewed in 27 districts mentioned that they had faced problems
related to access to finance.
This fact was emphasized as well by the participants in the 4th MoldovanGerman Forum regarding financing small and medium-sized enterprises, who
highlighted that funding remains the main problem of SMEs in the Republic of
Moldova. Thus, the relationship between SMEs and banks is still quite tense. The
entrepreneurs opinion might be summarized as follows: In Moldova, obtaining a
loan involves a lengthy and troublesome procedure, because banks do not have
a clear strategy on SME finance. For these reasons, the costs of obtaining a loan
are several times higher than the European average cost for a credit and the
required guarantees are very high.
Broadly speaking, the participants suggested the following:
1. The banks in the Republic of Moldova must develop a clear strategy targeting the needs of SMEs. The local banks main concern is other than to
help or contribute to revitalize the SMEs sector.
2. Banks must train staff to work with SMEs in order to make the connection
between banks offer and SMEs requirements, help them to get the products they need and manage them successfully. The funders, as a rule,
do not address the issue of finance on an individual, personalized basis
in relation to companies interested in obtaining loans, but, on the contrary, have standardized approaches, leading to rejection of customers
and their desire to get financing.
222
223
Methodology applied
The methodology is based on the synthesis of the discussions and conclusions within the round tables of the IVth Moldo-German Forum. The experts who
elaborated the study related the issues and conclusions of the roundtables to
other analyses and research in the areas under consideration. In addition, before
the beginning of discussions, participants filled out a questionnaire in which they
pointed out the most important issues and optimal solutions, which, in their opinion, could contribute to improve the situation in the field examined.
Roundtable discussions may be represented schematically as follows:
Introduction
(10 min)
Round table
Moderator
Researcher
Participants
Moderator
Introduces
the topic of
discussion
Preparation of debates
(20 min)
Group of participants
Each participant writes
down 1-2 issues relevant
for the topic under
discussion.
The moderator gathers
the papers and writes the
mentioned issues on the
board; if the issues jotted
down repeat themselves
- +1 shall be added in
front of the issue.
The main problems are
identified out of the issues
that gather more votes.
Researcher
Takes notes and summarizes
the issues mentioned for
publishing
Moderator
Presents the results of discussions
during the plenary meeting
224
Executive summary
The Government of the Republic of Moldova is using various methods and
instruments for providing the SMEs in the country financial assistance and access to finance through various International Financial Institutions, development
partners and crediting / funding projects or programs. Chapter 1 Role of the
Ministry of Economy in improving the financial environment in order to
support SMEs highlights the policies promoted by this Ministry as well as
the problems that still have to be solved.
Thus, it is pointed out that the Government of the Republic of Moldova, in
cooperation with financial institutions should focus on:
1. Promoting a monetary policy aimed at low and stable inflation;
2. Reducing interest rates on loans and ensuring their stability;
3. Attracting foreign investment to the financial sector and involvement of
strategic partners interested in developing the SME sector in the Republic of Moldova;
4. Developing credit guarantees for SMEs including the State Guarantee
Fund;
5. Developing innovative financial systems on supporting small and medium
enterprises;
Below we will list the most important ideas generated within the Forum
roundtables.
Chapter 2 examines the opportunities for attracting foreign investment
in the SME sector. It is known that foreign direct investments (FDI) are defined as all financial, material, technological and managerial flows that an individual or enterprise invests in the economy of another country with the aim to
conduct a lasting productive activity by having control over it. Attracting foreign
investment in SMEs sector remains a major problem for our country. In this regard, the decision-makers should pay particular attention to trends and factors
related to the evolution of global FDI flows, the development of policies and strategies for the economic development of the Republic of Moldova. But the most important is to take concrete steps to adjust to the best world practices so as not to
leg behind the global stream, which would perpetuate the current state or even
expand the enormous gap existing between the RM and countries in the region.
Global and regional evidence suggests that authorities interventions in terms of
policies should seek primarily to ensure a favorable economic environment.
In particular, this includes an attractive business and investment environment,
proper education and training policies to raise labor force skills, technological
policies to develop clusters and public policies on investment, designed to develop safe and efficient transport, communications and infrastructure networks.
225
Thus, the success in attracting FDI into the economy of Moldova and in the
SME sector, as the most representative of its economy, will depend mainly on
governmental policies. Economic theory and practice, including the experience
of other Central and Eastern Europe countries, demonstrate the importance of
an attractive business and investment environment, pro-active measures for attracting FDI, modernized infrastructure and improved labor force training. In this
context, we consider that strategies and policies to attract FDI in the Republic of
Moldova should focus primarily on these aspects. This is the only way to reduce
the disparities between Moldova and other countries in the region. Therefore, the
main measures should target the following:
Improving the regulatory framework for business activity, tax and customs
administration, reducing state bureaucracy, administrative burden and
corruption, increasing the efficiency and functionality of state institutions.
The most important, however, is the actual implementation of all these
measures. Although these ideas are transposed regularly in all programs
and strategies they are rarely implemented, either because of the lack of
political will or because of the states institutional weaknesses;
Improving extension services to strengthen SMEs capacities;
Improving the quality of human resources by increasing investment in
education and training, including continuous training of labor;
Fostering the establishment of clusters based on related activities, particularly in the SME sector. This will be an important incentive for FDI.
Focusing on the areas, or particular activities, where the effects of FDI
are particularly important;
Developing infrastructure (production, transport, communications, services);
Intensifying efforts to integrate local companies, first of all SMEs, in the
global value chain. Such integration efforts must seek to increase local
capacity and encourage investment, through direct contact with investors
or the establishment of special economic areas.
The Moldovan investment and export promotion organization (MIEPO)
and regional development agencies should carry out activities to increase the countrys regions attractiveness for potential foreign investors.
Attracting foreign investors by targeted projects taking into account the
specificity of the area and maximization of its potential could contribute to
reduce development disparities between Chisinau and Balti, on the one
hand, and Chisinau and the other parts of the country, on the other hand.
Chapter 3 deals with issues related to the taxation of SMEs. There are
five main problems related to the taxation of small and medium business:
1. The current tax system in the Republic of Moldova does not sufficiently
encourage the investment in SMEs sector. At the national level, small
226
2.
3.
4.
5.
and medium businesses can not pay their income taxes because at an
early stage of development they have no income (taking into account the
need to make other mandatory payments: registration, licensing, patent
receipt).
Taxation of SMEs does not have sufficient connection with the production
characteristics of the activity, which, therefore, inhibits the development
of small and medium business.
Under the conditions prevailing in the economy of the Republic of Moldova it would be more efficient to apply corrective tax tools. Unlike those
neutral they will steer entrepreneurial activity, investment and labor force
towards key branches of national and local economy.
Equality of taxpayers has to compensate for SMEs, through tax exemptions and systems, the increased risks, limited access to resources comparing to other economic entities, offering maximum freedom to local governments to regulate the tax system for small and medium enterprises
which, first of all, have a local specific character.
Currently, the fiscal potential of SMEs tax system is not exploited enough
due to the erratic operation of tax forms, which are isolated from each
other.
227
228
229
Capitolul 1
1.1.
Introduction
SMEs sector in the Republic of Moldova began to stand out as a phenomenon of socio-economic development of the country in the context of mass privatization. It was established and developed in adverse and unstable economic
conditions of transition and, presently, is acquiring an increasing importance in
providing employment, saturating the market with goods and services and participating in shaping the GDP.
According to the latest data of National Statistics, SMEs sector in Moldova
accounts for 97.5% of the total number of enterprises while the number of employees in the sector reaches 57.7% of total employment in the economy.
The quantitative impact of SMEs on economic growth can be assessed by
the SMEs share in GDP. In Moldova the SMEs share in GDP is 28.3%.
In the EU the SMEs sector generates 58.4% of GDP, in the U.S. 43.4% (in
2009).
In 10 out of the 12 countries of the Black Sea Economic Cooperation, the
SMEs share in GDP is less than 50% while in 5 countries less than 30%.
The global economic crisis has affected in different ways the growth rates of
certain groups of SMEs. For example, the increase in the number of enterprises
in the SMEs sector was due, in particular, to small and micro enterprises.
Currently, data on micro enterprises and micro-businesses, operating without registration, are not precise. There is no consolidated registry that would
analyze the activity of small and medium-sized enterprises and patent holders in
the country. As a consequence, the in-depth analysis of the SMEs sector development is not currently possible.
230
The crisis has also had an impact on other indicators characterizing the socio-economic development of countries adversely affecting the development of
the business environment.
Therefore, the adoption in 2012 of SMEs sector Development Strategy for
2012-2020 years is based on the need to ensure coherence in the development
and implementation of policies for SMEs, improve the quality of the recorded
quantitative and qualitative indicators.
The successful implementation of this Strategy will contribute to:
1) average increase in the number of SMEs per 1,000 inhabitants up to 25
SMEs by 2020, (14)
2) growth in the number of employees within SMEs up to 65% by 2020, (57)
3) growth of the SMEs share in the GDP up to 38% by 2020, (28.3)
4) effective competition by strengthening the competitiveness, boosting
growth and innovation of sustainable SMEs.
The strategy is the result of extensive consultations with civil society and recommendations of the development partners. To accomplish it, the Government
proposes the implementation of six priority areas, one of which is to improve
SMEs access to finance.
The problem of access to financial resources is traditionally one of the most
acute for small and medium-sized enterprises in the Republic of Moldova.
In Moldova, there is a fairly wide range of opportunities for SMEs external
finance. They are:
1. Commercial banks and micro financial institutions loans;
2. State Credit Guarantee Funds financial resources;
3. Funds of national and international projects / programs allocated, for financial support, to specific groups of entrepreneurs.
1.2.
Moldovan commercial banks offer businesses a relatively wide range of credit products. However, they focus mostly on already operating and larger enterprises. The business demand for long-term loans is not met: loan terms in most
cases do not exceed 2-3 years. A significant obstacle to business is the high loan
rate of interest, which, despite the decline in recent years, remains unacceptable
to many SMEs (see Table 1)
Table 1. Bank loans average rate of interest, %
In national currency
In foreign currency
2007
18.85
10.88
2008
20.96
12.02
231
2009
20.31
12.51
2010
16.25
9.91
2011
14.37
8.75
2012
11.98
8.32
The financial and economic crisis has had a negative impact on the crediting indicators of enterprises. In 2009, the amount of cash payments to economic
agents from loans and borrowings reduced sharply (see Table 2). In 2011 this
figure increased, reaching 91.8% of the 2008 level.
Table 2. Loans and credits issued by commercial banks to economic agents
2007
Loans and credits,
million lei
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
n/a
2007
36,9
35,1
58,2
2008
36,5
45,0
73,9
2009
36,0
46,1
73,4
2010
33,3
45,4
62,4
2011
33,6
42,8
55,9
In recent years, there have also been taken several steps in bank crediting
to improve the access of enterprises to credit. In particular, the Law on credit
history bureaus was adopted in 2008. Today the first organization of this kind
has already been created and started operating. As a part of the implementation
of foreign aid projects, EBRD opened a SMEs credit line for some commercial
banks in Moldova.
1.3.
Chapter 1
1.4.
The Special State Credit Guarantee Fund (operating in the framework of the
Organization for Small and Medium Enterprise Sector Development - ODIMM),
financed from the state budget, provides loan guarantees to economic agents
lacking sufficient collateral. For active companies the guarantee reaches 50% of
the loan amount, but not more than 1 million lei for a period of 5 years at 2% per
annum of the amount of the guarantee. For newly established enterprises the
guarantee is up to 70% of the loan amount, but not more than 500,000 lei. The
term of the guarantee is up to 5 years at 1.5% per annum of the amount of the
guarantee.
Currently, the fund portfolio amounts to 16.28 million lei. The remainder of
active guarantees accounts for 45 guarantees in the amount of 8.7 million lei, allowing granting the loans in the total amount of 24.3 million lei. (Slide 5).
Also, the fund provides guarantees for entrepreneurs participating in the
state programs PNAET and PARE1+1, ODIMM.
Thus, for companies participating in the program PNAET the guarantee is
up to 50% of the loan sum, but not more than 150,000 lei for a period of up to 5 at
1.5% of the amount of the guarantee per annum. For companies participating in
the program PARE1 +1 it is 50% of the loan sum, but not more than 200,000 lei
for a period of up to 5 years at 1.5% of the amount of the guarantee per annum.
233
1.5.
1.6.
Currently, for most SMEs in the Republic of Moldova, the problem of access
to finance remains one of the most acute. And, for nearly 15 years, the importance of this issue has been a priority, which is confirmed by numerous studies.
Surveys of entrepreneurs in Moldova (carried out regularly by the Ministry of
Economy with the assistance of the Institute of Economy Finance and Statistics)
show that the problem of access to finance has been and remains the most serious both in the pre-crisis period (2007) and more recently (2011-2012).
And IEFS studies indicate the increase in the significance of this problem for
entrepreneurs over this period.
Thus, in 2012, 73.3% of the 136 entrepreneurs surveyed in 27 districts of the
country faced with the problem of access to finance (Table 4).
The main difficulty for entrepreneurs in terms of access to financial resources
is the high interest rate of the credit and the high cost of the procedure for obtain-
234
Chapter 1
Problems
Access to financial resources
73,3
45,9
Equipment, Technology
33,3
19,3
Real estate
11,1
Information
6,7
Others
3,7
No problems found
4,4
Source: IEFS
ing a bank loan. Furthermore, the problem of finance is related to the long and
troublesome procedure for obtaining credit and the fear of not repaying the loan.
Thus, most of the entrepreneurs surveyed faced the problem of high interest rates of loans, the high cost of the loan (this problem has been named by
82.8% of entrepreneurs). More than a third of entrepreneurs (38.8%) named as
a problem the complexity of the procedure of processing the loan; 33.6% of the
surveyed entrepreneurs fear not to be able to repay the loan; for 31.3% the problem was the lack of collateral, incorrect assessment of collateral by the bank.
17.9% of the entrepreneurs do not hope to be successful in getting a loan or
investment, while 11.2% are not aware of how to draw a business plan, forecast
the business development. For 10.4% of the respondents the problem is the lack
of ability to attract investment in business. Finally, for 2.2% of the entrepreneurs
the problem of limited access to finance is associated with the partial activity of
the company in the black economy.
1.7.
legislation, as well as political instability, which limits the inflow of funds from external donors, including those allocated for crediting entrepreneurs.
Along with some successes achieved in supporting the sector of small and
medium-sized enterprises, the Government together with the financial institutions should do much more, and in particular:
1. pursue a monetary and credit policy aimed at low and stable inflation;
2. decrease interest rates on loans and ensure their stability;
3. attract foreign investment in the financial sector and first of all the investment of strategic partners interested in the development of small and
medium-sized businesses
4. continue the development of SMEs credit guarantees including those
through the State Guarantee Fund;
5. develop venture capital investment of informal credit schemes;
6. develop innovative systems for the small and medium-sized enterprises
finance;
Access to cheap sources of finance is vital to the development of a competitive SME sector. The real results of projects and financial programs that are
already implemented in our country are encouraging and many entrepreneurs
have demonstrated perseverance and entrepreneurial spirit.
The exchange of experience as well as suggestions made for improving the
activity of both state and private structures will further foster the development of
small and medium-sized enterprises and the businesspeople will get answers to
many problems they face.
236
Chapter
Capitolul1 2
Introduction
34.5% in total revenue from sales and contributes with 28.3% to the total GDP of
the country. The research in this chapter started from discussions of the Fourth
Moldovan-German Forum on SMEs finance. This issue was the subject of one
of the discussion panels at this event, with the participation of SMEs representatives, mainly from Gagauzia and the southern region of the country. The analysis
is not confined merely to the conclusions of the discussions. Instead a broader
approach was used. Firstly, we introduce the notion of foreign investment and
motivations of countries, in particular those in transition, as in the case of the
Republic of Moldova, to attract foreign investment as this is reflected in the scientific literature (subchapter 2). Secondly, we refer to the foreign investments
developments and trends at global and regional level (subchapter 3). Thirdly, we
deal with the evolution of foreign investments in the Moldovan economy, evolution of foreign investment in the SME sector and the way they have influenced to
date the structure of the economy and its development (subchapter 4). Fourthly,
we analyze the investment climate in the Republic of Moldova as a driver of investment attractiveness of the country (subchapter 5). Finally, we list the conclusions and recommendations of the research presented in this chapter and of the
discussions, conclusions and recommendations of the participants in the panel
Opportunities to attract foreign investment in SME sector in the framework of
the Fourth Moldovan-German Forum on SME finance (subchapter 6).
2.2.
Rodica Milena Zaharia World Economy, Bucureti, publishing company ASE, 2004
Maria Caracota Dimitriu, Dumitrache Caracota Capital investment assessment, Bucureti, 2004
Anghel E. Ion Economic problems. FDI, modernization and factor endowment, Economic Information
and Documentation Centre, Bucureti, 2002
238
Chapter 2
239
Primary motivations
ture of intermediate products, necessary for the basic production in the country
of origin or to manufacture the same product as in the country of origin but at a
more developed stage5.
FDI flows play an increasingly important role in the contemporary economy. They, along with the domestic capital, affect the development of national
economies and contribute significantly to enhancing their competitiveness.
However, neither the FDI flows nor their benefits come automatically. With the
growing awareness by all countries of the importance of FDI, more attention is
paid to the policies that can enhance the benefits of such investments for their
development6. For small countries with limited local capabilities (such as the
Republic of Moldova) any development process is bound to be more dependent
on FDI than in other countries7. The positive impact of FDI on the welfare and
competitiveness of beneficiary countries is widely acknowledged. The Republic
of Moldova, like all countries in transition, has a range of objective and subjective reasons underlying interest in investment, especially in the direct foreign
investment:
The need of capital for retrofitting and economic recovery following the
restructuring imposed by the transition to another economic system the
5
Anghel E. Ion Economic problems. FDI, modernization and endowment factors, Economic Information
and Documentation Centre, Bucureti, 2002
Foreign direct investment and performance requirements: new evidence from selected countries, UNCTAD, 2003
Sinjaya Lall Reinventing Industrial Strategy: The Role of Government Policy in Building Industrial Competitiveness, G-24 Discussion Paper Series, No. 28, April 2004, UNCTAD
240
2.3.
Chapter 2
Due to the fact that the resources as the main factor influencing profit were
replaced by other components such as technological or organizational, the FDI
flows have been diverted from the less developed countries possessing raw materials, to the states having technology9. According to experts assessment, FDI
in developing countries have shifted from the search for markets and resources
to the search for efficiency. However, for many developing and transition countries, low costs, access to natural resources and regional markets are still factors
with high attractiveness for foreign companies10.
8
9
10
Rodica Hncu, Denis Jelimalai, Greta Ofrim FDI important component of international economic
flows, Economica journal, nr. 1 (71), 2010
Ioan Denu Foreign direct investment, publishing company Economic, Bucureti, 1998
Rodica Milena Zaharia World Economy, Bucureti, ASE publishing company, 2004
241
During 1990-2011, global FDI stock increased from $ 2.1 trillion to about $
20.4 trillion, while the annual inflow of FDI increased from $ 207 billion in 1990
to $ 1.5 trillion in 2011. Foreign subsidiaries of multinational companies generate 1/3 of world exports and 10% of global GDP, and the inflow of FDI is about
10% of gross fixed capital worldwide. Although in recent years the FDI inflow has
increased continuously, in 2011 it was still 23% below its peak level, reached in
pre-crisis 2007 year11. In 2012 it is estimated that it further reduced to about $
1.3 trillion, under the pressure of macroeconomic instability in most regions and
increasing uncertainty of investors12. Nevertheless experts mention that since the
second half of the 90s, global FDI grew faster than other macroeconomic indicators like the GDP, exports or domestic investment13.
Table 2: Global FDI flow by geographical destination
Region
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Total
1975,5
1790,7
1197,8
1309,0
1524,4
1310,7
Developed countries
1310,4
1019,6
606,2
618,6
747,9
548,9
Developing countries
574,3
650,0
519,2
616,7
684,4
680,4
Transition economies
90,8
121,0
72,4
73,8
92,2
81,5
South-Eastern Europe
14,3
14,2
8,9
4,8
7,7
3,5
CSI countries
76,5
106,8
63,5
69,0
84,5
78,0
Developed countries
66,3
56,9
50,6
47,3
49,1
41,9
Developing countries
29,1
36,3
43,3
47,1
44,9
51,9
Transition economies
4,6
6,8
6,0
5,6
6,0
6,2
South-Eastern Europe
0,7
0,8
0,7
0,4
0,5
0,3
CSI countries
3,9
6,0
5,3
5,3
5,5
6,0
Source: World Investment Report 2012 and Global Investment Trends Monitor, no.
11, 2013, UNCTAD
A remarkable development in global FDI flows, in 2012, was that for the first
time developing countries attracted more FDI (51, 9%) than developed countries
(41.9%), the remaining 6.2% went to transition countries in Southeast Europe and
the CIS countries (Table 2). This can be an opportunity for the transition countries,
including Moldova, to attract more FDI. The share of countries in transition in
global inward FDI flows increased from 4.6% in 2007 up to 6.2% in 2012, includ11
12
13
242
Chapter 2
243
Primary Manufacsector
turing
Services
% of investment
Primary Manufacsector
turing
Services
Average 2005-2007
130
670
820
41
50
2008
230
980
1130
10
42
48
2009
170
510
630
13
39
48
2010
140
620
490
11
50
39
2011
200
660
570
14
46
40
a greater influx of FDI. However, evidence indicates that foreign companies are
interested mostly in investing only in a limited number of these countries, called
core group countries. These are countries that provide the best conditions for
FDI. Most of the FDI going to countries outside the core group are niche investments attracted by specific characteristics of the host country, and normally
would not have gone to any other country. The implication of this evidence for
countries beyond the core group wishing to develop attractive policies for FDI,
including the Republic of Moldova, is to avoid competition in the short term using tax holidays or other incentives, instead they should focus on developing
conditions core group countries meet: political and economic stability, proper
legal regulatory and procedures framework, enabling environment for exports to
compensate for the small size of the local market, more qualified workforce and
stronger and more efficient local providers of infrastructure business services,
and material inputs15.
In the figure below we will show Moldovas competition area in global FDI
flows according to developments over the last 5 years. Since this is a general
scheme and not a concrete one for a certain investment, we will not consider
the countries in the core list deeming that all countries in the region are direct
competitors.
15
Charles-Albert Michalet Strategies of Multinationals and Competition for FDI, the IFC and the World
Bank, 1997
244
Chapter 2
Developed countries
(549 billion $)
Growth 42%
Developing countries
(680 billion $)
Growth 118%
Transition economies
(82 billion $)
Growth 90%
Southeast European
countries (3,5 bln $)
Growth 24%
The RM competition
area (3,5-78 bln. $)
Growth 24-102%
CSI countries
(78 bln $)
Growth102%
Surce: Elaborated by the author based on data of WIR 2012 and Global Investment
Trends Monitor, no. 11, 2013, UNCTAD
2.4.
245
Figure 3: Evolution of FDI stock per capita in the period 1992-2011, U.S. $
Transition
countries
World
average
Developed
countries
Moldova
Source: UNCTAD
Even during global recession and declining flows, some regions and countries managed to substantially increase the FDI attracted. According to the 2012
UNCTAD report, The flow of FDI to developing countries and transition economies increased in 2011 by 12%, reaching a record 777 billion $, mainly due to the
continued growth of investments in greenfield projects16. Unfortunately, Moldova
is not among the major beneficiaries of this process. The Republic of Moldova
has the lowest level of inflows and FDI stock, and the lowest number of greenfield projects among all countries in Europe, surpassing in this respect only some
transition countries in Central Asia (Kirgizstan and Tajikistan). Both compared
with the transition countries in the region and with the neighboring countries with
a common historical past, which are now EU members, Moldova had poorer
results in recent years. Thus, Moldova has the lowest level of FDI stock (3163
million $) almost 3 times less than Georgia, 1.5 times less than Macedonia or
Albania, 1.6 times less than Armenia and 1.8 times less than Montenegro. And
these countries have the worst performance in attracting FDI among all European countries. In comparison with the neighboring countries comparable in
terms of population and territory, with a common historical past, which recently
became EU members (Estonia, Latvia, Slovakia) the differences increase from
4 to 16 times. This situation is due to reduced FDI flows that Moldova manages
to attract every year despite favorable global and regional conjuncture. Thus, in
2011, FDI inflow in the Republic of Moldova was 3.8 times lower than in Albania;
3.6 times lower than FDI inflows in Georgia, 2 times lower than that of Armenia and Montenegro and 1.5 times lower than FDI inflows in Macedonia. Since
the main FDI inflows in the transition countries are greenfield projects, Moldova
should make greater efforts to attract them in order to reduce the discrepancy
with other countries. But while the number of greenfield projects implemented in
2011 in some countries under comparison (Albania, Montenegro) was lower than
in Moldova, in terms of their value our country is again the last.
16
246
Chapter 2
FDI in GDP, %
247
Before 2007 there was a reduced FDI inflow in the Republic of Moldova due to
low level of competitiveness of the country, because there is a direct correlation
between these two indicators. 17 Less favorable business and investment climate
seemed to have an impact on foreign investors decisions that preferred to invest
in countries that were safer from the economic and political point of view.
Romanias accession to the EU in 2007 affected FDI inflow in Moldova. Several European businesses from Romania relocated to Moldova where labor costs
and fiscal conditions seemed to be more attractive. FDI increased fast in 2007
and this trend continued in 2008, in the context of introducing zero tax on reinvested income and sustainable economic growth. However, the zero tax on
reinvested income is not the only factor that has attracted foreign investors and
does not seem to be the most important. Thus, in 2008 FDI continued to rise,
but this trend was more due to increased investment in share capital and not to
reinvested income, that on the contrary, decreased compared to 2007.
Table 5: FDI flow in the Moldovan economy by types of capital invested,
million $
FDI in national
economy
Share capital
Reinvested income
Intercompany loans
2000
2001
2002
2003
129,49
84,99
100,31
106,23
87,56
56,41
-2,6
47,1
-36,64
30,72
-27,43
58,58
15,34
20,41
2008
2009
2007
2010
2004
46,42
-22,83
2011
2005
39,33
71,63
2006
41,59
100,16
2012
In this context, it is clear that the income tax level (rather low in regional comparison) is not the only barrier that adversely affects the investment decisions of
foreign investors. General business climate, economic and political framework
and other factors that determine the attractiveness of a country are also very
important. Since 2008 the global crisis diverted again FDI flows from Moldova.
Since 2009, in the context of global economic crisis and political instability in
Moldova, FDI inflows have dropped considerably, from a little more than 7 times
(2009) to 2.5 times (2011). This is one of the most significant decreases in FDI in
Central and Eastern Europe. Compared to the period before the crisis (2008) all
17
248
Chapter 2
FDI components have decreased: investment in the share capital by 3.1 times,
intra-group loans by 5.5 times, while reinvested income recorded negative values
in 2012. This evidence reveals a process of disinvestment. But even within FDI
inflows in 2012, according to the NBM, 27.7% were purchases of property by
non-resident individuals and companies18 rather than productive investment. By
the end of 2012 FDI stock amounted to 3338.79 million $ (Figure 5), of which: equity capital and reinvested income - 2568.82 million $, intra-group loans - 769.97
million $.
Figure 5: Structure of FDI stock in dynamics, million $
4 000,0
Intra-group
loans, stock
at the end of
period
3 500,0
3 000,0
2 500,0
Equity capital
and reinvested
earnings, stock
at the end of
period
Net annual
inflow of FDI
2 000,0
1 500,0
1 000,0
500,0
0,0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Source: NBM
The investors from the EU countries have the largest share in FDI stock of
share capital at the end of 2012 (52.7%). According to the NBM, nearly a quarter
of EU investment in Moldova comes from Holland and Cyprus; investing companies from these countries being mostly SPE (Special Purpose Entity), used as
intermediaries by actual owners. Investment from the Netherlands and Cyprus
(about 25%) distorts to some extent the investment analysis by country of origin,
because quite often the investors from the Netherlands and Cyprus are actually
investors from Russia, Moldova and other countries. CIS investors have 11.6%
of FDI stock in the share capital and investors from other countries - 35.7%19.
In terms of individual countries, the largest investors in Moldova are Russian
companies, with more than 190 million $, but actual investment from Russian
investors could be higher, on the account of investments listed as from the Netherlands and Cyprus. This is followed by investments from the Netherlands, with
slightly more than 150 million USD, the USA - about $ 145 million, Cyprus and
Germany with about $ 140 million each.
Most of the foreign direct investment is concentrated in financial intermediation activities, especially in banks. Moreover, there is an increase in the share of
this sector in the structure of FDI. Thus, if in 2008 it accounted for 19.8% of the
total FDI stock; by 2012 its share increased to 27.7% or more than of all FDI
in the Republic of Moldova. This proves that the FDI market in Moldova is domi18
19
Balance of payments of the Republic of Moldova for 2012, NBM, 28 March 2013
Balance of Payments of the Republic of Moldova for 2012, NBM, 28 March2013
249
nated by market seeking FDI of the financial groups having extensive networks in
many countries (Groupe Socit Generale, Gruppo Veneto Banca, Erste Bank,
Pro Credit, Raiffeisen, etc.). The next sector that is of interest to foreign investors is manufacturing. Its share in FDI stock increased in the last four years from
19.1% to 23.5%. Among the largest investors in this sector we can list Lafarge
(cement production), Knauf (building materials), Sudzuker (sugar production),
Draexlmaier and Lear Corporation (automobile accessories and spare parts industry), Lactalis Group and Efes (food and beverages), etc. It seems that the
main reason for these companies investment in this sector is limited local operating costs (especially cheap labor), local resources (in the building materials
industry and processing of agricultural raw materials) and the local market (food
and beverage). Wholesale and retail share in total FDI stock declined from 23.3%
in 2008 to 16.8% in 2012. The main investors in this sector are Metro, Lukoil,
Mabanaft, Petrom, Rompetrol, etc. Obviously, these investors are interested in
the local market, but the economic crisis and the exhaustion of the consumption boom of the years 2007-2008 have slowed down investment in the sector.
However, foreign investors favor non-tradable goods sectors with high rates of
return on investment, but without a major impact on the competitiveness of the
RM economy (about 75% of total FDI stock). Furthermore, the bulk of FDI in Moldova comes from large companies. The production sector of economy and SMEs
do not benefit much from foreign investment. They have a low competitiveness
and as a results imports rates grow much faster than exports rates. According
to some authors, Foreign investments in Moldova have benefited so far from
monopoly situation, which allowed them to get high profits due to high prices
and tariffs for services provided. This refers to such important investors in the
countrys economy like Gazprom (majority stake in Moldova-Gaz), Gas Natural
Fenosa, Orange, Moldcell, Lafarge, wholesale supermarkets20.
However, since 2004 the mounting flow of FDI has also led to the increase
in the number of SMEs joint ventures and those with foreign capital although at
a slower rate than that of large companies. This, in turn, has contributed to an
increase in the number of employees and the amount of sales (Table 6). This
table reflects the change in the number of SMEs with foreign and mixed capital,
the number of employees and sales revenue of these companies compared with
the same indicators of local businesses and companies of all types of size and
property. As we can see, the number of SMEs with foreign capital increased at
the highest rate in 2011 compared to 2006 and reached - 58%, while the number
of domestic SMEs increased only by 32% and those mixed (with foreign and
domestic capital) - by 29%. The growth rate of the number of SMEs with foreign
capital was, however, slightly lower than the increase of the total number of companies in the same period (65%), which confirms the tendency of foreign investors to invest mainly in big business. Similarly, SMEs with foreign capital in this
period had the most dynamic growth in the number of employees - it increased by
20
Dumitru Moldovanu FDI and foreign trade main instruments of international re-specialization of
Moldovan economy, Economica, nr. 4 (60) 2007
250
Chapter 2
21
Constantin Doltu FDI and their influence on the modernization of transition economy, , ASEM, Chiinu, 2007
251
2006
Growth, %
Number of employees in
SMEs
companies
Total for
all types of
ownership
35.542 47.337
33
332.720
32
34
-11
77
Local ownership
32.889
43.570
32
305.631
267.697 -12
36
33
-16
75
Foreign
ownership
1.174
1.856
58
11.614
13.643
17
2.878
3.710
29
65
56
138
Joint ventures
1.479
1.911
29
15.475
12.844 -17
4.203
3.787
-10
32
49
2006
2011
2011
Growth, %
Total number of
SMEs
Growth, %
Companies by
Ownership
2006
2011
47.200 64.391
employees
Sales
volume
Chapter 2
Share in the
Share in the
companies, %
employees, %
2006 2011
before tax, %
2006 2011
Average 20062011
2006 2011
Average 20062011
2006 2011
sales revenues, %
Average 20062011
SMEs by
ownership
Average 20062011
Share
of the total 2011 vs. 2006
Table 7: Evolution
of some
SME
by
ownership,
total number
of
totalindicators
number of
total financial result
Total for
all types of
ownership
98,3
97,5
97,9
57,9
57,7
58,4
46,2
34,6
39,8
35,2
35,9
36,5
Local
ownership
91,0
89,8
90,3
53,2
52,5
53,3
40,2
31,0
35,4
32,1
32,7
33,4
Foreign
ownership
3,2
3,8
3,6
2,0
2,7
2,5
2,5
1,8
2,1
0,2
2,0
1,2
Joint ventures
4,1
3,9
4,0
2,7
2,5
2,6
3,6
1,8
2,4
3,0
1,3
1,9
A high territorial concentration that was only enhanced over time is characteristic for FDIs in Moldova. This correlates with the economic growth pattern specific to the Republic of Moldova based on the concentration of economic
activities in Chisinau and Balti. Although the number of companies with foreign
capital, that invested in Moldova in the period 2008-2011, increased by 26%, the
absolute majority of such companies (more than 84%) are located in Chisinau.
For comparison, the number of such companies increased in the North development region (without Balti) by 15%, in the South development region by 20%,
in the Centre development region by 23%. The largest increase in the number
of companies with foreign investment was in Balti - by 58% (even more than
in Chisinau, where the increase was 26%), confirming that it is turning into the
second important pole of business and industrial growth in Moldova, after Chisinau. Largely, this is due to the relatively big number of population, availability
of physical and social infrastructure that is more developed than in other regions
(except Chisinau), traditions, a number of industrial companies and a free economic zone. Gagauzia also witnessed a significant increase in the number of
companies with foreign capital by 31%. The total number of companies with foreign capital that were registered (3877 in 2011) seems to be quite high but most
of them are situated in Chiinu (3270) and are concentrated in the wholesale /
retail sector 1420 while only 531 companies operate in industry. Without available statistical data on the size of these companies, we can only assume that
their vast majority are small and medium sized enterprises with an average share
capital slightly less than 2 million (we do not refer here to financial sector and
gas, electricity and water supply).
253
Total
Chisinau
2 594
Regions
of development
North
region
Bli
Center
region
3 088 3 270
84,4%
84,5%
84,3%
86,3%
86,2%
86,8%
145
178
196
4,7%
4,9%
5,1%
4,0%
5,4%
5,3%
67
88
106
2,2%
2,4%
2,7%
1,7%
3,1%
2,7%
222
259
273
7,2%
7,1%
7,0%
5,7%
6,2%
5,8%
South region
66
73
79
2,1%
2,0%
2,0%
3,0%
1,0%
1,1%
UTA
Gagauzia
45
55
59
1,5%
1,5%
1,5%
1,0%
1,2%
1,0%
Source: NBS
FDI stock in Chisinau during 2008-2011 accounted for 86% -87% of the total
stock of FDI in the country, followed by the stock in the Central region - about
6%, Northern region (including Balti) - about 5% and South development region
and Gagauzia - about 1% each. We can see that FDI in the South region is lower
than in the other regions. Here the stock of FDI in 2011 was only 57% of 2008
level, while the national average for the same period was 157%. There was an
increase of 158% in FDI stock in the Central region and Chisinau. This figure is
close to the national average. In Gagauzia the FDI stock increased in 2011 to
165% compared to 2008, while the North region doubled the FDI stock (207%),
including Balti (249%). Again, these figures indicate that Balti is the leader in
terms of FDI growth, confirming the conclusions regarding the potential of this
city to become an important pole of development in the Republic of Moldova.
These data show that, with exception of the capital and Balti, the Republic
of Moldova is not very attractive to investors, especially because of poorly developed physical and social infrastructure. However, cheaper labor in districts is a
competitive advantage that determined the location of some foreign companies
outside Chisinau. This refers to the labor intensive sectors (such as clothing industry, production of electrical and electronic equipment), sectors where proximity to raw materials is important (beverages, processing and preserving of fruit
and vegetables, dairy products, manufacture of building materials) and sectors
oriented to serve the businesses primarily located in areas other than the capital
(for example rental and B2B activities).
Foreign capital played an important role in the growth of the Moldovan economy after the dramatic decline of the 90s. The number of companies with foreign
254
Chapter 2
participation (including SMEs) increased at a faster rate than the total number of
companies registered. The number of employees in these companies has also
increased whilst the number of domestic companies staff dropped. The effects of
such a contribution are best reflected by the increase in the share of companies
with foreign investment in the GDP. Thus, according to the NBS, the contribution
of companies with foreign participation to GDP increased from 1.0% in 1995 to
21.2% in 2010 (Figure 7).
Figure 7: Contribution of companies with foreign participation to GDP
2.5.
Inga Fonea Global economic crisis impact on the investment climate in the RM, Economica journal, nr.
2 (66) 2009
255
However, in comparison with other regional countries, the investment climate is not an asset for the Republic of Moldova. This is seen both in Moldovas
position in international ratings and the amount of FDI. As we have seen in the
previous paragraphs, Moldova ranks on the last place in Europe according to FDI
indicators. While the factors related to the market size are the same as in many
countries, and the human factor, despite the recent deterioration of its quality,
is still an element of attraction, the difference, in our opinion, is due to factors
related to the political and economic environment and local capabilities that the
country can provide to investors.
The reluctance of foreign investors to invest in the RM economy is explained
by other authors by political instability and lack of favorable conditions for business activity23. Others point specifically at issues affecting the investment climate
of the country, again referring, in particular, to factors related to the economic and
political environment24:
Despite a relatively good legal framework, conducive to attracting FDI,
proper and effective legislation enforcement and implementation remain
a major problem;
Active government interference, big influence of politics on the economy,
repressive actions of state bodies, including those against certain foreign
investors;
Instability of economic policies;
Slow pace of privatization process;
The RM unfavorable image in the world, it being perceived as a poor unpredictable country. The Transnistrian conflict worsens further this image.
Massive emigration of the labor force;
Frequent administrative interventions in the economic activity, including
numerous controls and inspections;
General bureaucracy, protectionism and corruption.
The same author also mentions that the state invests little in the development of physical infrastructure, education, that are indispensable conditions for
the development of long term business activity. And according to the White Paper
of Foreign Investors Association the main priorities for improving the investment
climate refer to the policies pursued by the state in the business environment25:
Granting to foreign investors the right to purchase farmland;
Strengthening the rule of law conditions by ensuring the independence
and accountability of the courts in terms of the decisions issued;
23
24
25
Galina Ulian Attracting FDI to the small business area, the journal Economie i Finane, nr. 5, 2001
Grigore Belostecinic Economic competiveness and promotion of FDI oriented to export a challenge for
the RM economy, the journal Intelectus, nr. 3, 2006
White Paper: Suggestions to improve investment climate in the RM, Foreign Investors Association (FIA),
2009
256
Chapter 2
We can make indirect conclusions regarding the attractiveness of the investment climate for foreign investors based on the analysis of some relative
indicators such as the fixed capital investments, compared with that of FDI (table
9). Analyzing these data, we can see that increasing FDI, basically, does not
induce increased investment in fixed capital, which means that the fixed capital
investment comes mostly from local sources. The reason is the insufficiently attractive investment climate, which does not provide long-term safety for foreign
investors. Thus, a significant part of FDI is directed to nonproductive sectors of
the economy, which does not require large investments in fixed capital and have
shorter recovery period.
Table 9: Comparative evolution of the growth rate of investment in fixed
capital and FDI
Indicators
Increase of the investment in fixed capital, %
Increase in net FDI, %
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
8,0
21,0
24,0
21,9
2,3
-33,5
22,6
11,8
97,3
30,8
35,1
109,7
31,4
-79,6
35,9
39,1
257
Market attractiveness
Albania
Armenia
Belarus
Cyprus
Estonia
Georgia
Latvia
Moldova
Slovenia
Macedonia
133
118
34
113
29
74
55
109
97
114
Availability of
low-cost skilled
labor
78
88
7
92
86
80
73
79
85
87
Enabling
infrastructure
96
92
52
38
63
83
77
90
21
84
Presence of
natural resources
114
128
56
140
97
127
100
132
102
130
Overall
rank
123
136
27
129
75
104
80
122
81
130
Source: Web table 32a: Country rankings by Inward FDI Potential Index, 2011,
UNCTAD
White Paper: Suggestions to improve investment climate in the RM, Foreign Investors Association (FIA),
2009
27
Ion Prachi Investment climate source of growth and poverty reduction in the RM, Romnia and the
Republic of Moldova. Competitive potential of national economies: Posibiliti de valorificare pe piaa
intern, european i mondial, Academia Romn, Bucureti, 2004
28
Astrtit Sulstarova FDI performance and potential rankings, Division on Investment and Enterprise,
UNCTAD
29
Web table 32a: Country rankings by Inward FDI Potential Index, 2011, UNCTAD
26
258
Chapter 2
Economy
Albania
Armenia
Belarus
Cyprus
Estonia
Georgia
Latvia
Moldova
Slovenia
Macedonia
Potential to
Rank in Doing Rank in Doattract FDI
Business by the ing Business
(ranking) acease of doing
by investor
cording to
business
protection
UNCTAD
123
85
17
136
32
25
27
58
82
129
36
32
75
21
70
104
9
19
80
25
70
122
83
82
81
35
17
130
23
19
Rank by
economic
freedom
index
58
38
153
41
13
21
55
115
76
43
FDI
stock per
capita in
2011, $
1462
1628
1359
20384
16437
2149
5398
892
7442
2291
Source: Elaborated by the author based on the potential for attracting FDI of UNCTAD, Doing Business index, economic and investment freedom index of Heritage
Foundation, UNCTAD database on FDI
countries as a potential for attracting FDI (Armenia, Macedonia, Albania, Cyprus). At the same time, Moldovas success in attracting FDI compared to these
countries is significantly lower (in 2011 the stock of FDI per capita in Moldova
was 1.8 times smaller than that in Armenia, 2.6 times smaller than that of Macedonia, 1.6 times smaller than that of Albania). In our opinion, this confirms the
above conclusion that the reason for this situation lies in the worse investment
climate in Moldova.
According to the latest survey of enterprises conducted by the World Bank
(Enterprise Surveys 2009), the 3 largest obstacles to doing business in Moldova are access to finance, inadequate qualification of workforce and access to
land30. Another important index characterizing economy attractiveness to investors is the index of economic freedom calculated by the Heritage Foundation.
According to this, in 2013 Moldova ranked 115 of 185 countries, being ranked
in the category of mostly unfree. In the same ranking Macedonia ranked 43,
Armenia 38 and Albania 58. In terms of investment freedom, Moldova shared
129-141 places with 12 other countries, while Armenia and Georgia were on
27-36 places, Albania was on 56-73, Macedonia was on 74-80, Latvia was on
17-26 and Estonia was on 2 -9 places31. In another international ranking, Doing
30
31
http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/Data/ExploreEconomies/2009/moldova
http://www.heritage.org/index/
259
Business 2013, elaborated by the World Bank, Moldova was ranked 83 of 185
countries in terms of the ease of Doing Business and 82 by investor protection. Other countries had a better position: Georgia 9th (19 investor protection);
Macedonia 23rd (19 investor protection); Armenia 32nd (25 investor protection);
Albania 85th (17 investor protection). Despite a certain degree of subjectivity of
these ratings, investors usually take account of them in the process of selecting
locations for investment. As a result, countries with better placement in these
rankings (and, therefore, with a better investment and business climate) have
better results in attracting FDI despite the fact that by theoretical potential in
attracting FDI they have a worse position (Armenia, Macedonia, Albania). The
table below proves this. Moldova has the worst position in reference ratings
among peer countries, respectively its results, measured as the stock of FDI
per capita, are the weakest, followed by Belarus, Albania, Armenia, Macedonia
and Georgia. Improving performance in these rankings should be part of the
policy efforts in attracting FDI. And this is not possible without improving the
investment and business climate.
The importance of business climate in successful attracting of FDI is also
mentioned by many specialized organizations, which elaborate comparative analyzes of conditions for attracting FDI in different countries. Thus, the Investment
Climate Advisory Service of the World Bank, in the introduction of the report for
2010, mentions that the factors driving the investment decisions of foreign companies are changing. Seeking for the new business opportunities they are now
more concerned about the financial and political risks, giving priority to stable
and predictable business environment. In response, governments everywhere
recognize that their chances of attracting more foreign investment depend on the
success in creating a more competitive investment climate32.
The importance of creating a favorable business environment for investment activity, stimulating the flow of investment into the country and contribution to the growth of export potential, based on the experience of some Eastern
European countries (Baltic States, Czech Republic and Slovenia) is mentioned
in the Strategy of attracting investment and promoting exports for 2006-2015,
which acknowledges the lack of investment, especially of the FDI in the real
sector of the economy. It also acknowledges that restricted investment activity of economic agents is not only due to limited financial resources, but also
to various administrative barriers in applying legislation, which negatively affect the launch and development of these activities33. Improving the business
environment, according to the Strategy, should serve as a basis for increasing
private investment, especially foreign direct investment. And to this end, the
Government intends to continue implementing reforms to improve the investment environment through regulatory reforms, particularly the simplification of
registration procedures, licensing, permitting, inspection and reporting of enterprises in the launch and development of business; review of legislative acts
32
33
Investing Across Borders 2010, Investment Climate Advisory Services, the World Bank
Strategy of attracting investment and promoting exports for 2006-2015, chapter II, p. 50
260
Chapter 2
regulating business activities; limit inspection bodies involvement in entrepreneurial activity, especially bodies that have powers of financial inspection; improving the competitive and fiscal environment by providing tax incentives to
investors, improving the system of tax administration; preventing and combating corruption; simplifying customs and administrative procedures to reduce
the complexity and time required for export operations; improve the existing
judicial system by making it independent, honest and qualified34.
However, although its been about 7 years since the approval of the Strategy,
the situation regarding FDI attraction has not been improved, on the contrary, on
the background of economic and financial crisis, the gap between Moldova and
other countries only deepened, the set goals have not been mostly achieved, and
the Strategy has not become a roadmap for the investment in the RM. This proves
the declarative character of the Strategy and the need for new approaches to attract investment and create an attractive business and investment environment.
2.6.
Strategy of attracting investment and promoting exports for 2006-2015, chapter II, p. 50
Holger Gorg, David Greenaway Much Ado about Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from
Foreign Direct Investment?, the World Bank Research Observer, vol. 19, no. 2
261
Improving the regulatory framework for business activity, tax and customs
administration, reducing state bureaucracy, administrative burden and
corruption, increasing the efficiency and functionality of state institutions
The most important, however, is the actual implementation of all these
measures. Although these ideas are transposed regularly in all programs
and strategies they are rarely implemented, either because of the lack of
political will or because of the states institutional weaknesses
Improving extension services to strengthen SMEs capacities;
Improving the quality of staff by increasing investment in education and
training, including continuous training of labor
Fostering the establishment of clusters based on related activities, particularly in the SME sector. This will be an important incentive for FDI.
Focusing on the areas, or particular activities, where the effects of FDI
are particularly important
Developing infrastructure (production, transport, communications, services);
Intensifying efforts to integrate local companies, first of all SMEs, in the
global value chain. Such integration efforts must seek to increase local
capacity and encourage investment, through direct contact with investors
or the establishment of special economic areas.
The Moldovan investment and export promotion organization (MIEPO)
and regional development agencies should carry out activities to increase the countrys regions attractiveness for potential foreign investors.
Attracting foreign investors by targeted projects taking into account the
specificity of the area and maximization of its potential could contribute to
reduce development disparities between Chisinau and Balti, on the one
hand, and Chisinau and the other parts of the country, on the other hand.
Chapter 2
finance SMEs (PARE 1+1, PNAET) because of bureaucracy and lack of other
funding tools; large regional discrepancies in the flow of investment with their
clear preference for Chisinau and the need to raise investment attractiveness of
other regions of the country; lack of sufficient skilled workforce that could operate
the sophisticated equipment brought by foreign investors; complex import-export
procedures; tax and customs administration problems (related to the abusive actions of tax inspectors and customs officials, bailiffs, large fines) and insufficient
protection of investors against abuse of these bodies; lack of accountability of
state bodies in taking decisions and action concerning economic agents and
corruption; political emphasis on economic development and state support for
SMEs. The participants in the debate suggested the following solutions:
Amending the tax and customs codes and other regulations relating to
the protection of investors;
Removing barriers to export and import activities;
Simplifying the procedures for access to the state funds supporting SMEs;
Better protection of intellectual property rights and trademarks;
Reducing the tax and administrative burden on business;
Adapting curriculum of educational institutions to the needs of employers
and labor market requirements;
Ensuring a continuous dialogue between SMEs in Moldova and abroad to
reduce financing costs;
Implementing at least 8 pilot projects in 8 districts with the assistance of
international organizations in the field of business development to improve finance conditions and business opportunities in these regions.
263
3.1.
Introduction
There have been many discussions about the heavy tax burden in the Republic of Moldova. Actually, Moldova has one of the laxest taxation in Europe36.
For example, in the EU as a whole, the tax rate is a little over 43% of GDP while
in Moldova it hardly reaches 30%. The taxation rate includes all mandatory taxes
and social contributions37.
Legal entities are taxed unequally: although small and medium size enterprises (SMEs) account for 20-30% of the national wealth, their contributions
to the national budget (VAT, income tax, other taxes and fees) and mandatory
health insurance and social security funds (pensions, unemployment, health
and other contributions) are higher than those of state-owned companies. The
gross result of the exercise GRE (the sum of all profits minus the sum of all
losses) for SMEs was approximately twice as high as that of large enterprises.
This makes SMEs the main taxpayer to the state budget. SMEs are also paying the highest amounts to the social budgets since they employ about 60% of
employees nationwide38.
An increased attention paid to the taxation of small and medium business
is not a new issue for Moldova and our region. Practices and regulations in this
area are not well set yet, therefore the discussions of the 4th Moldovan-German
Forum on SME finance are a good opportunity to highlight the problems and solutions suggested by participants in the fiscal relations with the state.
This study presents the results of discussions at this event, summarizing the
identified problems, suggested solutions and possible obstacles to implement
these solutions. But given the relatively low level of awareness of the concept
and rules of taxation in Moldova, the study begins with the definitions of this
concept and conceptual aspects of this issue from an international perspective.
In order to understand better the context of SME taxation, this chapter contains
the general provisions of the Moldovan legislation related to these issues. Taking
into account the previous discussions on tax system issues, this chapter summarizes the current practices and regulations. The following chapters examine
fiscal pressure issues at international and national level. The last chapter reflects
36
37
38
264
3.2.
The taxation system is the most decisive factor in the development of smallscale economic structures among all measures of governmental financial support39. Small and medium business deals with a wide range of accounting, reporting and taxation systems, compared to other businesses. Several special tax
regimes are used in order to develop small and medium businesses worldwide.
These tax regimes allow creating a favorable tax climate and reducing the tax
burden on businesses40.
Figure 1. Forms of support for small and medium businesses 41
financial
patrimonial
informational
Advisory
support in
training,
qualification
and retraining
staff
39
40
41
support
innovation,
industrial
production,
craft
support of
entities having
foreign economic
activity
support of
farming
entities
265
45
46
Brooks K. International and EC Tax Aspects of Groups of Companies. Canada. IFBD, 2008.
Kesti J. European Tax Handbook 2007. Amsterdam. IFBD, 2007.
. ., . . Evolution of tax system in Russia // Finance and credit-2005-9
page.31.
. . Taxation role in SMEs development: problems and prospects .: , 2009.
Taxes and taxation, . . .- .: 2004.- 502 pages.
266
Chapter 3
3.3.
267
I.
II.
III.
IV.
268
Chapter 3
269
3.4.
The tax system is a single strategy in the financial system of the Republic
of Moldova. According to Article 2 of the Tax Code, the tax system represents
all taxes and fees, as well as the principles, forms and methods for their imposition, modification and cancellation, and all the provisions for securing their
collection50.
Some economists believe that the fiscal system should be viewed more broadly
and that it includes the following elements such as (1) tax system, (2) taxing authorities and (3) tax law. All these links are closely related, because the tax authority
operates on the basis of tax legislation and uses taxes as a source of revenue for
the state51.
The taxation system should ensure the stability of taxes, set an optimal level
of taxation, which would not halt economic activity and worsen the financial situation of individuals and businesses52. Tax legislation has to establish legal rules
setting the taxes and sanctions for non-compliance with fiscal discipline. The taxing authority should conduct the activity of training taxpayers in terms of taxes;
coordinate the settlement and collection of taxes correctly.
The tax system comprises all taxes, fees and other payments conceived in
accordance with current tax legislation. According to Article 6 of the Tax Code,
they include (1) general state taxes and (2) local taxes (see Figure 2).
General state taxes and fees are established by the Moldovan Parliament,
while local taxes and fees, payment terms shall be approved by the Parliament
and have a recommended character for local authorities. In a concrete territorial
administrative unit they are set by the local council Decision on the application
of local taxes on the unit territory. Local governments may establish local taxes
only listed in the Tax Code. Thus, in different regions of the country we can see
various local tax systems.
The tax administration includes all institutions whose activity focuses primarily or secondary on enforcement of tax attributions (Figure 3).
50
51
52
270
Chapter 3
Income tax
Value added tax
Excise duties
Private tax
1. Customs duty
2. Road taxes
53
Taxes
Fees
271
Tax authorities
Customs
bodies
Court of
Accounts
Tax collection services
within municipalities
The tax authorities of the Republic of Moldova are the main part in the unique
tax administration. They include the Main State Tax Inspectorate and Territorial
State Tax Inspectorates subordinated to the MSTI.
The tax authorities activity is regulated by the Constitution of the Republic of
Moldova, the Tax Code and Laws of the Republic of Moldova, Government Decisions, and decisions of local authorities within their granted powers.
3.5.
272
Chapter 3
The fiscal management of the enterprise is the administration of the tax aspect in order to ensure compliance with the tax legislation and optimize the tax
burden through decisions, so that the obtained gain to justify the effort. Sometimes the best tax choice is not the best solution for the enterprise in terms of
its development strategy. This is explained by the fact that the tax options of the
enterprise have legal boundaries, which have to be respected in order to avoid
tax evasion.
The fiscal management of the enterprise has the following objectives:
Reducing the tax burden;
postponing the tax burden;
ensuring the fulfillment of tax liability of the company at a lower cost;
minimization of fiscal risk.
In all these situations you can successfully use fiscal instruments. Sometimes some components of business strategy have a meaning only in the context
of the tax advantage they provide (tax leasing, creating subsidiaries in free economic zones or tax havens, etc...)
3.6.
The Law on support of small and medium sized enterprises No. 206-XVI of
July 7, 2006 sets up the criteria of assigning the status of micro, small and medium enterprises. Based on its provisions the legislature established a separate
tax regime for small and medium enterprises.
Table 1. Classification of enterprises in micro, small and medium
Classification
criteria
Type
of enterprise
Micro
Small
Medium
Annual average
of the number of
employees
Annual sum of
incomes from sales
maximum 9
persons
maximum 49
persons
maximum 249
persons
maximum
3 million lei
maximum
25 million lei
maximum
50 million lei
not to exceed
3 million lei
not to exceed
25 million lei
not to exceed
50 million lei
Source: art.2 of the Law on support of the sector of small and medium sized
enterprisesno.206-XVI of 07.07.2006
Thus, in accordance with Chapter 7 of Title II of the Tax Code of the Republic
of Moldova (Law No. 1163-XIII of 24.04.1997) income tax payers are treated as
follows:
273
(1) Economic agents that are not registered as VAT payers are subject to taxation, except for peasant households (farms) and private entrepreneurs.
(2) Economic agents corresponding to par. (1) provisions and who, at the
date of December 31 of the accounting period that preceded the fiscal
year, gained income from operating activities totaling up to 100,000 lei
use the taxation under provisions of this chapter.
(3) Economic agents corresponding to par. (1) provisions and who, at the
date of December 31 of the accounting period that preceded the fiscal
year, gained income from operating activities totaling from 100000 to
600000 lei can choose the taxation under the provisions of this chapter
or in the generally established mode (registration as VAT payer).
(4) Economic agents who during the fiscal year become V.A.T. payers will
apply the taxation in the general way established upon registration as
VAT payers.
(5) Economic agents who during the fiscal year, ceased to be V.A.T. payers
will apply the taxation under this chapter upon cancellation of registration
as VAT payer.
(6) Economic agents applying the taxation under this chapter use the rules of
financial statements under Chapter 6 of title II of the Tax Code.
The income from operating activities obtained in the fiscal period declared is
subject to taxation.
The income tax rate is 3%.
The income tax is calculated by applying the tax rate on income from operating activities. The calculation of tax is carried out quarterly and budget payment
is made within one month from the corresponding quarter conclusion.
The deadline for submitting the report on the income tax is March 31st of the
year following the accounting period. The form and manner of filling out the report
is approved by the Ministry of Finance.
3.7.
Gogrnoiu Gh. Improving tax systems in the European integration perspective and contribution to the
formation of revenues (Moldo-Romanian experience). Chiinu, 2007. PhD in Economics thesis.
274
Chapter 3
1) Tb
4) Ptb
The tax burden rate is therefore an indicator measuring the share of income
from the production passing through a mandatory and public process of influence
instead of being left to the discretion of private initiative. One can define the tax
burden as being, actually, the level of taxation, the extent to which taxpayers as a
whole, society, economy bear, according to the results obtained from their activity, taxes and fees in the form of compulsory levies imposed and collected by the
state through legal coercion. It is, ultimately, the share of the income they waive
in favor of the state in a forced and compulsory way,
The consequences of rising tax burden can be manifested by various forms,
including57:
57
reduction of productive efforts, by resorting to the so-called tax abstinence, avoiding the fulfillment of certain operations (limitation of salary
activities) in order to escape the taxes they generate;
Chicu N. The impact of direct taxes on certain socio-economic processes. PhD thesis in Economics.
Chiinu, 2003.
275
Specific issues related to tax burden generated a series of attempts by American theorists to rethink the issue of taxation optimum.
In 1974 a prominent offer economist, Arthur Laffer, transposed graphically
an idea expressed by Adam Smith in 1776, according to which too high tax rates
destroy the basis on which they act.
Laffer estimates that there is a threshold of maximum tax burden beyond
which any increase generates a reduction in the tax revenue and this is because
an excessive tax burden discourages the taxpayer (natural or legal person) to
invest, save, produce and work.
According to Laffer curve (Figure 4), the mandatory levies amount is an increasing function of the tax burden rate, but only up to a maximum threshold,
noted by M, which corresponds to the maximum of the curve, after which it becomes a decreasing function of this rate, going to zero if the rate reaches the
theoretical level of 100%.
Figure 4. Laffer curve 58
Gogrnoiu Gh. Improving tax systems in the European integration perspective and contribution to the
formation of budget revenues (Moldovan-Romanian experience). Chiinu, 2007. PhD thesis in
Economics.
276
Chapter 3
non-taxable leisure, leading to the substitution effect or tax evasion so that the
total taxable income is reduced, causing the effect of transfer to the underground
economy.
3.8.
According to the World Bank data, the total tax rate in the Republic of Moldova is one of the lowest in the region:
Table 2. Total tax rate
Country
Total rate, %
Moldova
Romania
Russia
Ukraine
UE
31,2
44,2
54,1
55,4
43,1
Note: Total tax rate measures the amount of taxes, fees and mandatory contributions payable by businesses after accounting the deductions and exemptions allowed by law.
Taxes withheld (such as personal income tax) or collected and remitted to tax authorities (such as value added tax, sales taxes or goods and services taxes) are excluded.
This is due to the fact that legislation sets taxes and fees rates, whose level
is one of the most attractive / lower in the region:
Table 3. Corporate Tax Rate
Moldova
Romania
Russia
Ukraine
Income tax
tax rate
SMEs
12
3*
16
16
20
13
19
0**
VAT
tax rate
20
24
20
20
SMEs
20
24
20
20
Thus, with relatively low tax rates (compared to other countries in the region),
the Republic of Moldova has low tax burden (especially for SME sector) and
therefore can claim a status of tax haven. Obviously, the attractiveness of the
economy depends not only on tax rates but also on other factors (including fiscal)
which by their negative effect sometimes prevail over the positive and attractive
conditions created by low tax burden.
From the data of Doing Business 2013 report, issued under the auspices of
the International Finance Corporation and the World Bank we can see that Moldova does not have the highest threshold of tax burden for small and medium
enterprises. Instead, it has an exaggerated number of other problems in tax administration revealing a certain disinterest of authorities.
In this context, Moldova does not have leading position in the ranking of
states in terms of the shadow economy share in GDP, especially compared to
the European Union member states. The EU podium is occupied by states with
significantly smaller economies: Bulgaria (32.5%), Estonia and Lithuania 29.6%),
Romania (29.4%).
The shadow economy level in the world is increasing. If in 1997 the average
level of the shadow economy in the world was 32 %, then in 2009 it reached
36.5%. The study shows that a slight reduction in its level was recorded only in
11 countries.
According to a World Bank report, published in September 2010, the highest share of shadow economy in GDP for the years 1999-2007 was in Georgia
- 68.8% of GDP, followed by Bolivia with 68.1% and Azerbaijan with 63.3%. The
lowest level of the shadow economy was recorded in Sweden - 8.6%, U.S. - 8.8%
and Austria - 9.8%. In this context, the Republic of Moldova during 1999-2006
recorded an average of 45.08%59.
The World Bank report also mentioned that the Moldovan tax structure does
not have major differences, except for one: the share of other taxes in total tax
revenue is higher than in other countries. This is the consequence of a complicated tax system, which includes many small taxes and fees whose manipulation
can modify the tax burden. Over the last decade, the reforms in the budgetary tax
system of some countries led to a certain simplification of the tax system while
the complexity of the system reduces the fiscal policy efficiency and increases
administrative costs.
59
Study by IDIS: Moldova prey of undeground economy and tax evasion. http://viitorul.org/newsview.
php?l=ro&idc=132&id=3986&t=/STIRI-EVENIMENTE-IDIS/Studiu-IDIS-Moldova-prada-a-economiei-subterane-si-a-evaziunilor-fiscale
278
Chapter 3
3.9.
of additional control over employees, and as a result makes the business legal.
With regard to the income tax of 3% for non-payers of VAT, some forum participants have suggested that it is necessary to pay attention to the following points:
Chapter 71 of the Tax Code should be applied only to micro and small enterprises which are provided for by the Law on the support of small and medium
enterprises nr. 206-XVI dated 7 July 2006.
Another suggestion was to apply this tax option only to tax businesses whose
founders are individuals.
Salary
According to participants in the forum, there are two main reasons for not
paying official salaries:
1. substantial expenditure of small undertakings for mandatory health insurance and social security contributions of employers;
2. the employees of these enterprises are not interested in getting official
salaries.
Practice shows that those interested in official salary basically are:
employees who have already received or intend to get a bank loan because the bank needs to assess the solvency of the employee and it uses
official information (certificate from work, income tax statement for the
previous period);
individuals who are in pre-retirement age (usually 5-7 years before retirement age) and wish to get a higher pension;
young families that plan to have children.
Thus, in order to have fewer cases of wage payments in envelopes, participants suggested the following solutions60. For small businesses that meet all the
following requirements:
annual turnover (sales) up to 3,000,000 lei,
number of employees is not more than 10 persons
to combine mandatory health insurance contributions paid by the employer
(3.5%) and social security contributions (23%) and set this combination in absolute value for each employee, paid quarterly based on the average number of
staff.
The volume of absolute value to be computed annually, at a rate of 20% out
of 80% of average salary in the economy set by the government. The share of
80% is proposed only for Balti and Chisinau, for other cities - 65% and for rural
area - 50%.
As a result, the entrepreneur will know from the very beginning that it makes
no sense to calculate the salaries of the employees at less than 60% of the average monthly salary (in 2013 it equals 2310 lei), because they still pay social
security and health insurance contributions from this sum. At the same time,
employees will get an official salary and collections from income tax, as well as
60
280
Chapter 3
3.10.
There are five key issues related to the taxation of small and medium business:
1. The current tax system in the Republic of Moldova does not sufficiently
encourage the investment in SMEs sector. At the national level, small
and medium businesses can not pay their income taxes because at an
early stage of development they have no income (taking into account the
need to make other mandatory payments: registration, licensing, patent
receipt).
2. The taxation of SMEs does not have sufficient connection with the production characteristics of the activity, which, therefore, inhibits the development of small and medium business.
3. Under the conditions prevailing in the economy of the Republic of Moldova it would be more efficient to apply corrective tax tools. Unlike those
neutral they will steer entrepreneurial activity, investment and labor force
towards key branches of national and local economy.
4. Equality of taxpayers has to compensate for SMEs, through tax exemptions and systems, the increased risks, limited access to resources comparing to other economic entities, offering maximum freedom to local governments to regulate the tax system parameters for small and medium
enterprises which, first of all, have a local specific character.
5. Currently, the fiscal potential of SMEs tax system is not exploited enough
due to the erratic operation of tax forms, which are isolated from each
other.
In order to improve the taxation system of small and medium business the
following ways were suggested:
regulation of interest rates for interbank loans, as well as the loans granted to real sector. Setting a limit for the difference between the interest
rate at which the National Bank offers loans to commercial banks and
interest rates of loans granted to the real sector (not more than 3%);
introduction into the local administration staff of a post of special representative at the level of deputy mayor or vice-chairman of the district that
would deal with the system and the number of inspections of small and
medium enterprises.
Other tax and accounting problems in the SMEs activity are as follows:
I. The need to keep accounting records in compliance with the National
Accounting Standards and presentation of financial and statistical statements to authorities. These obligations are usually quite costly for SMEs
281
282
Chapter
Capitolul4 4
4.1.
Introduction
Countries
EU (27 countries)
Czech Republic
Germany
Estonia
Spain
France
Italy
Romania
Slovakia
Sweden
Great Britain
2010
36
23
43
65
27
50
18
3
33
75
45
2011
37
30
45
68
28
51
20
4
34
78
:
2012
40
34
45
68
32
54
21
3
40
79
52
What is eBanking?
The eBanking, i.e.
Source: Eurostat
electronic banking represents the use of electronic means to conduct banking transactions via the Internet (transfer of funds directly from one account to another, view excerpts, informing on accounts, etc). These services reduce the time spent and cost of the
transactions.
The advantages of ebanking services for SMEs:
Comfort. Online banking is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week,
and its just a click away.
It saves time while receiving and processing documents submitted to the
bank. Like this you do not have to get to the bank and can avoid the queues at the counter.
Allows processing and operating bank accounts outside the bank.
283
4.2.
In developed countries but also worldwide there is a preference of financial institutions customers to use online services to the detriment of the counter.
Young customers, well educated and with higher incomes choose to use the
Internet and mobile channels.
While the online environment is becoming a hub of relationships with customers and e-banking is growing rapidly, the subsidiary is heading (in long-term)
towards a lack of utility. eBusiness and banks in developed countries tend to use
and popularize electronic channels to increase online sales and other eBanking
services.
In developed countries the most widespread distance banking services are:
Internet banking (including PC Banking), Mobile Banking (which includes other
services such as SMS Banking), ATM (Automated Teller Machine), POS terminals.
Internet banking is omnipresent on the European Community market. It provides the following services:
Non-transactional:
Viewing account balances
Viewing recent transactions
Downloading bank statements, in Excel, PDF format
Ordering cheque books
Downloading applications for M-banking, E-banking, etc.
Transactional:
Chapter 4
cyber fraud. Instead of traditional memorized passwords, OTPs are required from consumers each time they want to perform transactions
using the online or mobile banking interface. If the request is received,
the password is sent to the consumers mobile via SMS. The password
expires after being used or after the scheduled period of validity has expired.
SMS banking is also
used for account balance
enquiries or requests for
current information such
as currency exchange
rates, deposit interest
rates as published by the
bank. The banks client
has the option to select
from a preset list of alerts
the information they wish
to receive on the phone.
Depending on the option
chosen, a customer may
be authorized to carry out
either non-financial transactions or both types of
transactions:
financial
and non-financial.
Countries
EU (27 countries)
Czech Republic
Germany
Estonia
Spain
France
Italy
Romania
Slovakia
Sweden
Great Britain
2010
70
61
82
68
59
74
59
42
67
88
80
2011
73
67
83
71
64
76
62
47
71
91
83
2012
76
65
85
75
68
80
63
54
75
92
87
Source: Eurostat
286
Chapter 4
4.3.
eBanking services can develop concurrent with the increase in the level of
electronic technological development of both business environment and the population as a whole, the culture to use new technological tools and their absorption
capacity. The potential of population to use these services is a key factor in the
development of eBanking and eCommerce.
According to statistics, in 2012 in the Republic of Moldova, over 417,000
subscribers had access to the fixed Internet. 20 600 of them are legal entities and
388 700 are households. It means that more than a million people have access
to the Internet. There is a sharp increase in the penetration rate of technologies.
The evolution of Internet access over the last three years can be seen in the
figure below, presenting the share of households in the Republic of Moldova that
had access to the Internet in 2010-2012.
287
But the actual number of Internet users is higher. In 2012 there were more
than 178 thousand users of mobile Internet, including over 154,000 individuals
and over 24 thousand legal entities.
Table 4: The number of mobile internet users /subscribers
Year /subscribers
2011
2012
19.741
24.094
105.072
154.365
124.813
178.459
Type
Economic agents
Natural persons
Total Mobile Internet users
In comparison with the previous year this figure rose by 43%. The number
of individual subscribers increased by 46.9% and that of legal entities by 22%.
At the same time, over 27% of mobile subscribers accessed the Internet from
their mobile phone through 2G/3G/4G networks as an additional service to voice
service.
The electronic media made astonishing progress despite the economic crisis
and currently one third of the population and 40% of businesses have Internet
access. This degree of electronic technologies penetration can be considered
as a solid foundation to foster the development of electronic financial services
in the Republic of Moldova and a strong justification of the profitability of making investments in technology solutions and in eBanking and eCommerce product platforms. The improved legal framework, the new law on electronic money,
288
Chapter 4
along with eGovernance project that is currently being developed by the Republic
of Moldova Government will boost both the accelerated expansion of the penetration rate of Internet access and the use of the potential offered by the digital
environment for providing financial banking services.
A complementary product which stimulates eBanking and eCommerce services is the bank card both for business and individuals. In this segment, according to statistics, at the end of the first quarter of 2013 over 1 million cards
(1,056,035) were in circulation. During the first quarter of 2013 there were carried
out operations worth 5.1 billion lei. 95% of them were cash withdrawals and only
5% were used for non-cash payments. At the same time the number of POS terminals increased by 19% in the first quarter of 2013 compared to the same period
last year. Thus, despite a favourable environment and availability of technological platforms, the card users remain loyal to cash transactions.
Moreover, the share of non-cash payments in the country with cards issued
abroad is 29.6%, indicating that foreign cards holders have a higher degree
and culture of cashless payments than the local card users.
Meanwhile, of all transactions made abroad with cards issued in the Republic of Moldova, 76% are non-cash payments. Thus we may conclude that the
environment abroad discourages the use of cash.
4.4.
Since the digital environment is sufficiently developed, it is important to assess the potential, importance and necessity of eBanking services for small business.
According to statistics published at the end of 2012, in the Republic of Moldova there are 38300 micro enterprises, 9600 small and 4500 medium enterprises.
It means that there are 49 400 SMEs of a total of 50 700 companies. In the total
number of SMEs, the largest share of 77.5% is that of micro enterprises (with up
to 9 employees and annual sales and asset values up to 3 million).
Small businesses (including that micro) mostly need the following banking
services:
to make a series of payments / transfers, budgetary payments,
pay salaries to some employees,
facilities for the employer, a business card for making purchases,
consultation of account, statements,
for retailers - cash deposit services, POS terminal for credit card customers,
overdraft to cover the gap in time to pay the bills, short-term obligations,
lending for investment and permanent capital.
In order to assess the needs of eBanking services for the small business,
there were held interviews with representatives of small business mostly from
289
4.5.
Chapter 4
Table 5: List of operations offered through Internet banking for legal entities:
Operation
Payments in lei
Currency payments
Electronic submission of supporting documents for currency
payments
Currency conversion
Supplying business card from the current account
Supplying current account from the business card
Extract (export) data from Internet Banking
Import data in Internet Banking
Mobile version
In the banking system, 22% of corporate customers are connected to Internet Banking and they carry out about 60% of transactions. And less than 6% of
individuals, who are bank customers, use Internet Banking.
While choosing a certain service an important factor for any company, particularly for SMEs, is cost. Internet Banking Costs for enterprises vary from one
bank to another:
6 Moldovan banks do not charge fees for connecting to Internet Banking;
other banks charge between 100 and 250 lei.
The monthly fee ranges from 0 to 100 lei, on average 50 lei per month.
Tariffs set by most banks for transfers within the bank, made at the counter, on paper, are within 2-4 lei and for Internet banking these costs are
reduced to 0-3 lei.
Transfer costs for clients of other banks, at the counter, on paper, are 5-6
lei and for Internet banking these costs are reduced to 3-5 lei.
We see that eBanking services costs are not high and connection or service
fees (when charged) are largely compensated by the discounts offered for payment orders. Thus the cost of these services is rather a negligible factor in the
decision to access eBanking services.
Mobile banking is less spread in the RM. It is rather a product designed for
individuals while making insignificant payments or is used as a related eBanking
service by legal entities for notification and consultation of account. Given that
in Moldova Internet banking for individuals is just beginning to gain momentum,
currently, these incipient products are proposed only by 2 banks.
It is recommended to develop mobile banking particularly for individuals because the relatively simple format of operations is compatible with the small size
of mobile phone screens, but it is also a convenient option for business custom291
ers when there is a need for an urgent unitary operation outside their headquarters.
SMS banking is declining, being outdated from the technology point of view,
including for low security reasons, and at present it is used more as a related
eBanking service for short notifications and information requests.
One of the important elements of eBanking services is the bank card system. The cost of maintenance and operation with cards is a significant factor
in their widespread use. Banks currently offer solely cards of foreign operators
(MasterCard and VISA). Thus, licensing and maintenance costs are quite high.
In Germany and France, for example, about 60-70% of the payment cards are
issued by national operators with national coverage, their cost being significantly lower than that of international operators. Card operating services could be
cheaper if there were a national card operator. The use of national operators
cards is welcome for salary projects, social payments and bonus projects for
retailers with a national circulation. Historically, Moldova had a national operator
- MoldCard System founded in 1996 - the first and only national operator that existed in the Republic of Moldova. But due to the lack of demand for these services
it withdrew its services from the market. Such a national system could reduce
transaction costs with the card and the operating costs of eBanking services by
individuals. The NBM could encourage such a project, especially because it has
among its strategic objectives reducing cash in circulation and promoting noncash payments in the Republic of Moldova.
4.6.
Chapter 4
293
eCommerce progress would bring both SMEs and their customers in the field
of electronic transactions. But the degree of electronic financial intermediation of
population in Moldova is reduced and SMEs have a high degree of passivity in
the virtual world. The electronic information services are also underdeveloped
and there no, yet, conditions that would require the development of eCommerce.
The wide use of cards is discouraged by the lack of a national operator.
This makes their operational costs rather high both for traders and international
cards procurement by individuals. eCommerce costs are quite high as well (for
instance for of transactions, payments for services / products / ecommerce). The
costs of these services vary within the range of 2-7%. According to the rules of
payment systems (VizaCard and MasterCard), these costs should be withdrawn
from the transaction amount from the seller. In this case, the seller of servicegoods has no right to impose additional fees on the value of goods / services.
The price of services and goods purchased should already include these tariff
costs. For many types of activities such fees and commissions reduce profitability and businesses become unprofitable.
Fast pay solutions would be an alternative to replacing cards while making
payments. But to date only terminals allowing payment of a range of services
outside the banking offices have proven to be reliable, which eventually are also
limited to cash collection from the population. The new law on electronic money
could foster the development of electronic payment solutions.
A special place in these future solutions is that of the security level of operating the system. Ensuring this ellement can lengthen the process of developing
and implementing new IT systems and increase budget pressure on IT implementers. And electronic frauds are growing exponentially worldwide.
Thus, the conclusions on the relationship of SMEs and Internet Banking solutions are divided into two distinct areas:
A. Electronic services of SMEs while dealing with banking and financial
institutions(services and transactions related to their own bank accounts):
1. Under the pressure of large corporations, commercial banks offer Internet Banking services that generally meet the SMEs requirements. Thus,
most often these services fully meet the needs of the SMEs electronic
servicing. All 14 banks offer Internet banking solutions for legal entities
and this market is quite developed.
2. The tariffs set by banks for Internet Banking solutions are quite low and in
many cases their service is free of charge. Most often transactions through Internet Banking have a lower cost compared to the standard price.
B. Electronic services of SMEs while dealing with their customers, in particular with individuals. eCommerce services market:
1. The premises for ecommerce and massive transactions between SMEs and
their customers (especially individuals) are not fully developed at this stage.
294
Chapter 4
2. SMEs do not use all Internet opportunities for providing customers full
information about services and goods. The underdeveloped character of
this segment, leads to a situation when ecommerce does not have a platform for implementation.
3. Cash processing for SMEs is cheaper than the price paid for ecommerce
solutions. Cash sales favor tax evasion and do not provide an incentive
for SMEs to use electronic solutions.
4. The cost of cash operations is too cheap (in many cases free) to motivate
people to shift to electronic payment solutions, including in their relation
with banks.
5. Although Internet penetration rate among the population is high, the use
of internet banking by individuals is extremely low.
6. Despite the fact that demand in this segment is low 10 banks of 14 offer
Internet Banking for individuals.
295
CONCEPTUAL FUNDAMENTALS
OF FINANCING THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR
AND ACCESS TO FINANCE
5.1.
Introduction
World Development Report 2008: Agriculture for Development, The World Bank, Washington D.C.
296
5.2.
47970
7258
101
National
economy
Agriculture
National
economy
Agriculture
49444 300223
73057
1084
National
economy
Agriculture
National
economy
Agriculture
2538
16184 19307
660
Financial result:
profit (+) / loss (-)
million lei
4707
Agriculture
50681 519882
Sales revenue,
million lei
Average number of
employees persoane
Total by
category
211759
National
economy
SMEs,
total
Number of
enterprises
26547
976
1440
16095 18565
26066
2477
1538
36246
87577
4930
24892
-53
394
659
99
937
910
1418
599
222
17728
2283
29
129
93
9570 122214
38344
716
907
5333
3958
50
423
432
15089 12322
21509
864
14824
2262
-42
38336
90432
9821
-25
1391
3694
385
-41
297
607
385
893
298
5.3.
Chapter 5
Government spending, both capital and the current ones have been considered to be, for a long time, the main tool of agricultural policy pursued by
government authorities. These expenses become subsidies if their costs are not
recovered from the beneficiaries. Budget subsidies are explicit subsidies; however, agricultural policy provides also implicit subsidies. Common examples
are customs duties, which to a certain extent, protect domestic producers from
international competition and thus subsidize higher production costs. Price control is implicit subsidies (or vice versa, implicit taxes) because they are often set
at levels that subsidize consumers and taxpayers. There are also implicit subsidies in the management of natural resources when a user does not pay all the
damage they cause. Benefits offered by implicit subsidies to manufacturers are
sometimes called economic rents.
In agriculture, the most common examples of explicit subsidies are:
construction of irrigation systems, the cost of which is rarely fully recovered from users;
free allocation or subsidized sale of states agricultural land with or without the issuance of an absolute property title;
Production credit granted by state banks or provided by commercial banks at an interest rate lower than market rates due to the refinancing lines
of government.
Providing free research and extension services or at a lower price than
their cost (it is often said that externalities related to agricultural research
justify it to be subsidized);
Purchase of crops at higher prices than those on the market then sold at
prices lower than the market price;
Construction of rural roads in rural areas;
Provision of seeds, seedlings, veterinary services and other inputs at prices lower than the market price.
Historically speaking, the pressure to bear such costs by the public budget
emerged from the desire to compensate for the unfavourable development of
299
real prices for agricultural products in the farming sector. In some cases, domestic prices followed the downward trend in prices on the world market, whereas
in other cases, government control of prices of certain products decreased agricultural output prices to subsidize consumers. At international forums it is often
mentioned that production and export subsidies of rich countries depressed the
world prices of agricultural products compelling governments of poor countries to
take compensatory measures.
Given the central role of public expenses in agriculture and the fact that
many of them are subsidies, it is worthwhile developing criteria to determine
where these are justified. One of the most common justifications is the poverty
of subsidies beneficiaries. However, before starting developing programs and
policies in the sector based on this assumption, we must ask ourselves whether
subsidies were well targeted to poor households.
To examine the pros and cons of subsidies we must consider an elementary
result of economic theory: interventions that affect market prices (in goods
or inputs) invariably lead to a loss of economic welfare. If producers and
consumers get, eventually, their advantage, the loss to society will be greater
than the sum of their earnings. This is what is called loss of static equilibrium.
Practical effects of this abstract principle determine the decrease in growth rates,
because resources are not any more allocated to their most efficient uses. Since
there are more arguments for and against subsidies, the theoretical argument
will not be emphasized below, although it must be kept in mind because of its
empirical relevance.
The practice of granting agricultural subsidies suggests the following main
arguments against the use of public subsidies:
Subsidies tend to be directed towards less competitive branches of activity; these are usually the sectors most pressing the government to obtain favours. They are rarely allocated to industries and products that have
a comparative advantage. As a result, over time, subsidies tend to shift
allocation of productive resources towards the least competitive sectors
which is detrimental to long-term growth prospects of the country.
Once established, a subsidy is difficult to be removed. Economic and
political interests mobilize themselves to support it; subsidy cost is likely
to press the government for many years, sometimes increasingly harder.
Budgetary cost of subsidies increases the tax burden or reduces government spending that could benefit another industry. In an era of tight fiscal
discipline in the world this aspect becomes critical.
Subsidies tend to keep active manufacturers with high costs and conceal
the need to improve productivity (cost reduction) which makes the economy less competitive internationally and sets excessively high prices of
products for domestic producers and consumers.
A public policy that relies heavily on subsidies tends to encourage producers to invest time and resources to search for other government favours
300
Chapter 5
Subsidies may also be used to offset some cases of imperfect information. A frequent example is farmers in remote areas that do not have
reliable information on market prices and for this the Government pays
the cost of regular price dissemination for instance, by radio broadcast.
Indeed, it may be difficult to find advertising agencies willing to cover the
broadcast cost for this customer group.
Other market failures may require the use of subsidies. But it should be
done with great caution. Thus, often, the regulation may be a more suitable and appropriate response compared to subsidizing. In addition, not
all cases of market dysfunction require government action. The issue of
information asymmetry between lenders and borrowers (concerning the
ability and willingness of the borrower to repay) was the subject of much
comment in the literature and politics often responds, in this regard, by
developing a financial regulatory framework conducive to the development of microfinance. However, in some cases, were used subsidies for
banks branches in rural areas to encourage them to contact their potential rural customers. Education and training are classic examples of
situations justifying government financial support because a commercial
provider of educational services is not able to benefit from all the advantages that will result for society (externalities).
5.4.
Chapter 5
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
256,0
465,3
270,0
563,5
400,0
400,0
247,7
546,8
533,2
560,5
400,0
400,0
Source: elaborated by the author based on data from AIPA, www.aipa.md, MAIA,
www.maia.gov.md.
Since the term subsidy measure began to be applied in 2010, Table 4 summarizes the measures to subsidize agricultural businesses during 20102013.
Table 4. Measures to subsidize agricultural businesses in the Republic of
Moldova 2010 - 2013
2010
(8 measures)
Boosting lending to
farmers by commercial banks
2011
2012
(10 measures)
(8 measures)
Boosting lendBoosting lending to
ing to farmers by
farmers by financial
commercial banks, institutions
microfinance and
savings and loan
associations
303
2013
(10 measures)
Boosting lending to
farmers by financial
institutions
2010
2011
(8 measures)
(10 measures)
Boosting agricultural Boosting agricultural production
risk insurance
risk insurance
Stimulating investStimulating investment for establishment for establishment of perennial
ment of perennial
plantations
plantations
2012
(8 measures)
Boosting agricultural
production risk insurance
Stimulating investment
for establishment of
perennial plantations
and promotion of wine
production
2013
(10 measures)
Boosting agricultural production risk
insurance
Stimulating investment for deforestation perennial
plantations subject
to cassation, for establishment of perennial plantations
and promotion of
wine production
Stimulating investStimulating invest- Stimulating investStimulating investments to vegetable
ments to vegetable ments to vegetable
ments to vegetable
production on proproduction on pro- production on protect- production on protected land
tected land (winter ed land (winter green- tected land (winter
greenhouses, solar- houses, solariums,
greenhouses, solariiums, tunnels)
tunnels)
ums, tunnels)
Boosting investment Stimulating invest- Stimulating investStimulating investfor purchasing agri- ment for purchas- ment for purchasing
ment for purchasing
cultural machinery
ing agricultural
agricultural machinery agricultural machinand equipment and
machinery and
and equipment, the
ery and equipment,
irrigation equipment equipment, the
equipment for irrigathe equipment for
equipment for ir- tion systems, antifreeze irrigation systems ,
rigation systems , systems and hail proantifreeze systems
antifreeze systems tection installations
and hail protection
and hail protection
installations
installations
Stimulating invest- Stimulating investment Stimulating investment in equipping in equipping and tech- ment in equipping
and technological nological renovation of and technological
renovation of live- livestock farms
renovation of livestock farms
stock farms
Stimulating purchase Stimulating purStimulating purchase of Stimulating purof breeding animals
chase of breeding breeding animals and
chase of breeding
and maintaining the animals and main- maintaining the genetic animals and maingenetic fund
taining the genetic fund
taining their genetic
fund
fund
Stimulating investStimulating invest- Stimulating investment Stimulating investment in post harvest ment in post har- in post harvest and
ment in post harvest
and processing invest and processing processing infrastruc- and processing
frastructure develop- infrastructure de- ture development
infrastructure develment
velopment
opment
304
2010
(8 measures)
Subsidizing farmers
to offset energy costs
for irrigation
2011
(10 measures)
Subsidizing farmers by offsetting
energy costs for
irrigation and
drainage
Boosting users
of plant protection products
(pesticides) and
fertilizers (mineral
fertilizers)
-
Chapter 5
2012
(8 measures)
-
2013
(10 measures)
Boosting of irrigation
Figure 2 shows the structure of the subsidy fund by forms of support (measures subsidized). Thus, the largest share is that of Measure 5 Stimulating investment for purchasing agricultural machinery and equipment, the equipment
for irrigation systems, antifreeze systems and hail protection installations (41%).
This measure creates significant problems in implementation. Thus: - the procurement term is not clearly defined -; - the likelihood of favouring some machinery providers over others is very high; - there are no objective grounds for making
the list of equipment eligible for subsidies, etc..
Measure 3 Stimulating investment for establishment of perennial plantations
and wine promotion accounts for 19% in the structure of the subsidy fund. This
measure is considered easily implemented. At the same time, this measure favours agricultural units with relatively large surfaces.
Third by size in subsidy fund structure is Measure 8 Stimulating investment
in post harvest and processing infrastructure development (11%). This measure, like others compensating investment expenditures, is hard to implement
and lacks objective assessment criteria. Allocations to these measures often favour certain farmers and perturb competition in agriculture.
By legal form of agricultural enterprises, subsidies are granted mainly to limited liability companies (67% of the subsidy fund), 22% to peasant households
In 2012 the amount of average subsidy per beneficiary for peasant households amounted to 38501 lei, for limited liability companies to 121680 lei, for joint
stock companies to 184366 lei.
Analysis of the subsidy system in the Republic of Moldova agriculture
reveals the following shortcomings:
The agricultural subsidy fund is characterized by a pronounced volatility.
Interpretations of the subsidy measures allow multiple treatments.
Subsidy-seekers hugely outnumber subsidy beneficiaries. This increases
305
M8
11%
M1
10%
M2
9%
M3
19%
M5
41%
M4
3%
Number of
Sums subbenesidized, lei
ficiaries
Subsidized amount /
amount requested,%
Peasant
households
Limited liability company
Joint-stock
company
Cooperatives
Other
Total
Subsidies approval
Dossiers accepted/
dossiers filed, %
Legal
form
Requests for
subsidies
Structure of subsidy
beneficiaries by legal
forms,%
Structure of subsidies by legal form, %
2072
118214525
2063
79427202
47
22
99,57
67,19
2004
378603818
1968 239466488
45
67
98,20
63,25
87
28169434
83
15302415
95,40
54,32
152
21491542
147
13947549
96,71
64,90
116
4431
13655288
560134607
114
7959724
4375 356103377
3
100
2
100
306
98,28 58,29
98,74 63,57
5.5.
Chapter 5
A value chain describes the full range of activities that are required to bring
a product or service from conception, through the intermediary phases of production, to final consumers, and residues management after use. These activities include design, production, marketing, distribution and support services up
to the consumption (and often beyond, when considering recycling processes).
The activities can be concentrated within a single entity or divided among different enterprises, as well as within a single geographical location or spread over
wider areas. The term value chain refers to the fact that value is added to preliminary products through combination with other resources (for example tools,
manpower, knowledge and skills, other raw materials or preliminary products).
As the product passes through several stages of the value chain, the value of the
product increases63.
Insertion of small and medium-sized producers into national, regional and international agricultural value chains is believed to have important consequences
for poverty alleviation in rural areas in countries with low per capita income due to
the potential of these businesses to increase income and create jobs. However,
the vast majority of smallholders in poor countries face a number of constraints
that often limit their ability to participate competitively in these chains, and there
is considerable concern that these manufacturers are excluded from important
growth opportunities.
The role and importance of small farmers for the Republic of Moldova agriculture and their potential of being involved in various agricultural value chains
can be seen in Table 6 that shows the structure of agricultural land by the categories of landholders. Thus, the peasant households (farms) have a significant and
relatively constant share of about 29%.
Over the past three decades, high-value agricultural markets have become
more sophisticated, consolidated and regulated, which makes it more difficult for
small producers to participate in value chains in these markets.
Determining ways of effective insertion of small and medium sized enterprises into high-value agricultural markets requires a thorough understanding of
the way these markets work.
63
Value Chain Development for Decent Work: A Guidefor Practitioners, Government and Private Sector
Initiatives, ILO, Geneva, 2009.
307
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2240,2
2239,4
2236,9
2234,0
2233,6
858,0
38,3
668,6
29,8
867,8
38,7
672,4
30,0
871,3
39,0
661,4
29,6
866,0
38,8
662,6
29,7
868,7
38,9
653,4
29,3
307,8
303,5
313,6
316,7
325,5
13,7
13,6
14,0
14,2
14,6
5,9
6,1
6,0
6,0
5,5
0,3
399,9
17,9
0,3
389,6
17,4
0,3
384,6
17,1
0,3
382,7
17,0
0,2
380,5
17,0
High-value agricultural or agro-food products are non-bulk agricultural commodities, that either require special handling, such as fresh fruits and vegetables,
or are processed in one or more post-harvest stages before reaching the end
market (such as honey). These products tend to be much more labour intensive
than cereals and other traditional agricultural products, largely because mechanization is complicated by the need to prevent damage to fragile products. Quality
is the key factor in determining prices and potential markets. These products are
also subject to a number of sanitary and phytosanitary regulations to ensure food
safety and prevent the spread of diseases that affect food security. The highvalue agricultural products determine usually higher prices and generate large
income for manufacturer. Figure 3 shows examples of typical agricultural value
chains.
Given the fundamental role the medium-sized, small and micro enterprises
play in employment in poor countries, major development agencies worldwide
including the Department for International Development (DFID, UK), German
Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ), United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) developed methodologies in order to better focus their interventions to improve the role of micro, small and medium-sized actors in the value
chain and offer these economic agents the opportunities to fully enjoy gains from
their participation in these chains.
308
Chapter 5
Seeds
Production
Selection
Processing
Processing
firms
Small farms
Distribution
and marketing
Supermarkets
Medium farms
Large farms
Fertilizers
intermediary /
exporters
Food services
Small farms
Agrochemicals
Medium farms
Packingplants
(selection,
packing, etc.)
Large farms
Cool
storageunits
Farm
equipment
Importers and
wholesales
Large producer exporter companies
Packingplants
(selection,packing,
etc.)
Irrigation
equipment
farms
Cool storageunits
Small-scale
retailers
For the agricultural units in the Republic of Moldova, the agricultural value
chain finance can improve the overall efficiency of those offering and requiring
agricultural finance.
309
contract
relationship-based
partnership
vertical
integration
Comfort zone
Seller
Source: Miller C., Jones L. Agricultural Value Chain Finance Tools and Lessons,
FAO, UN, 2010.
310
Chapter 5
Argumentation
Producer-driven
- small-scale producers,
- access to new markets;
especially organized into
- getting a higher market price;
groups such as associations or - stabilize and secure market
cooperatives;
position
- large farmers
Buyer-driven
Intermediary-driven
Integrated
processors
- assure supply
- increase the volume of
exporters
deliveries
retailers
traders, wholesalers and other - supply more discerning
traditional market actors
customers cover market
niches and interests
- make markets work for the
poor
- Local and regional
development
- new markets and generating
higher value
- market monopolies
Source: elaborated after Vorley B., Lundy M., MacGregor J., Business models
that are inclusive of small farmers, Paper prepared for FAO and UNIDO
as background to the Global Agro-Industries Forum, New Delhi, 811
April 2008.
therefore, contract farming is the most common model of the value chain based
on customer as the driving force.
Intermediary-driven business models are found in many countries with a dual
agricultural system where a developed agro-industry coexists with marginalized
producers living on subsistence level. Costs of organizing and training small producers may be considered too high to be taken over by a large company. As
a result, intermediation by development organizations, both non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) and government agencies facilitate opportunities for integrating small farmers into commercial value chains, finance becoming a regular
feature for such facilitation.
Finally, the integrated model of value chain not only connects producers to
other participants in the chain - inputs suppliers, intermediaries, processors, retailers and service providers, including financial, but integrates many of these
links by relations of ownership and / or formal contractual relationship. The integrated model has many of the features of the other models described above,
namely - close links of contracts concluded between the parties, technical management and strict compliance, including also an intricate structure of flows and
services in the value chain.
312
Chapter 5
because they are not organized in cooperatives or other producers organizations. Producer organizations or cooperatives would connect farmers
directly with retailers, exporters, traders and agricultural enterprises.
Projects specialized in the design and funding of agricultural value chains
financed by international donors deal with isolated aspects of this topic
without addressing it in a conceptual and methodological way nationwide.
Creation and funding of agricultural value chains requires active involvement of supreme national institutions regulating monetary and financial
issues (the NBM, NCFM, Minister of Finance).The efforts of these institutions should be well-targeted in the context of a thoroughly-designed
approach at the national level by the MAFI regarding the agricultural value chains.
5.6.
Bibliography
REFERENCES TO CHAPTER 1
1.
2.
3.
4.
REFERENCES TO CHAPTER 2
1. Ion E. Anghel Probleme economice. Investiii strine directe, modernizarea
i nzestrarea cu factori, Centrul de Informare i Documentare Economic,
Bucureti, 2002
2. Grigore Belostecinic Competitivitatea economic i promovarea investiiilor
strine orientate spre export o provocare pentru economia Republicii Moldova, revista Intelectus, nr. 3, 2006
3. Natalia Bncil Investiiile strine factor relevant al creterii economice,
Conferina tiinific internaional Rolul investiiilor n dezvoltarea durabil a economiei naionale n contextul integrrii europene, 29-30 octombrie
2010
4. Florin Bonciu Investiiile strine directe, Ed. Lumina Lex, Bucureti, 2003
5. Maria Caracota, Dumitrache Caracota Evaluarea investiiilor de capital,
Bucureti, 2004
6. Ioan Denu Investiiile strine directe, Editura Economic, Bucureti, 1998
7. Constantin Doltu Investiiile strine directe i influena lor asupra modernizrii
economiei n tranziie, tez de doctor n economie, ASEM, Chiinu, 2007
8. Constantin Doltu Societile transnaionale ca promotori ai investiiilor
strine directe, revista Economica, nr. 4 (56), 2006
9. Inga Fonea Impactul crizei financiare mondiale asupra climatului
investiional din Republica Moldova, revista Economica nr. 2 (66) 2009
10. Rodica Hncu, Denis Jelimalai, Greta Ofrim Investiiile strine directe
component important a fluxurilor econimice internaionale, revista Economica, nr. 1 (71), 2010
11. Holger Gorg, David Greenaway Much Ado about Nothing? Do Domestic
Firms Really Benefit from FDI?, the World Bank Research Observer, vol. 19,
no. 2
12. Sinjaya Lall Reinventing Industrial Strategy: The Role of Government Policy
in Building Industrial Competitiveness, G-24 Discussion Paper Series, No.
28, April 2004, UNCTAD
13. Anda Mazilu Transnaionalele i competitivitatea, Bucureti, 1999
315
316
38. www.unctad.org
39. www.bnm.md
40. www.statistica.md
REFERENCES TO CHAPTER 3
1. Codul fiscal al Republicii Moldova. Legea Republicii Moldova Nr.1163-XIII
din 24.04.97.
2. Legea privind susinerea sectorului ntreprinderilor mici i mijlocii nr. 206-XVI
din 7.07.2006.
3. Hotrrea Guvernului Republicii Moldova nr.474 din 28 aprilie 1998 cu privire
la aplicarea mainilor de cas i control cu memorie fiscal pentru efectuarea decontrilor n numerar.
4. Balaban E. Fiscalitatea agenilor economici. - Chiinu, 2008.
5. Brooks K. International and EC Tax Aspects of Groups of Companies. Canada. IFBD, 2008.
6. Chicu N. Impactul impozitelor directe asupra anumitor procese social economice. Tez de doctor n tiine economice. Chiinu, 2003.
7. Evaluarea nivelului economiei tenebre n Moldova. http://www.jurnal.md/ro/
news/evaluarea-nivelului-economiei-tenebre-in-moldova-529696/
8. Gogrnoiu Gh. Perfecionarea sistemelor fiscale n perspectiva integrrii
europene i contribuiei la formarea veniturilor bugetare (experiene moldoromne). Chiinu, 2007. Tez de doctor n economie.
9. Greenwoods & Freehills guide to Tax consolidation for corporate groups in
Australia. 2005. http://www.gf.com.au/spb42329_internals.pdf.
10. IMM-urile sub presiunea inegalitii cu care se aplic fiscalitatea. i
angajeaz 60% din salariaii Romniei. http://economie.hotnews.ro/stiri-finante_banci-14299400-imm-urile-sub-presiunea-inegalitatii-care-aplica-fiscalitatea-angajeaza-60-din-salariatii-romaniei.htm
11. Joint Taxation in Denmark. BDO, 2010. http://www.bdo.dk/Publikationer/
Publikationer/Joint%20Taxation%20in%20Denmark.pdf
12. Kesti J. European Tax Handbook 2007. Amsterdam. IFBD, 2007.
13. Moldova are cea mai ridicata sarcina fiscala din CSI. http://www.noi.md/md/
news_id/16597
14. Nerudova D. Group Taxation Under The System of Common Consolidated
Corporate Tax Base // Economics & Management. 14, 2009.
15. Petutschnig M. Sharing the Group Benefits of a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base within Corporate Groups // Vienna University of Economics
and Business.
16. Politica fiscala pe 2010 diminueaza presiunea fiscala? http://www.allmoldova.com/ro/experts/27.html
17. Reprezentanii mediului de afaceri i conducerea Inspectoratului Fiscal Prin-
317
36. 40 .
http://gagauzinfo.md/index.php?newsid=875
37. . . .- -/: , - 2004.-129
.
REFERENCES TO CHAPTER 4
1. IDIS Viitorul, Finanarea ntreprinderilor Mici i Mijlocii din Republica Moldova: Probleme, Tendine i Perspective, Chiinu 2012
2. www.statistica.md
3. www.anrceti.md
4. www.bnm.md
5. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
6. www.bcr.md
7. www.maib.md
8. www.vitoriabank.md
9. www.ecb.md
10. www.socbank.md
11. www.fincombank.md
12. www.procreditbank.md
13. www.mobiasbanca.md
14. www.eximbank.md
15. www.comertbank.md
16. www.moldindconbank.md
17. www.bem.md
18. www.unibank.md
19. www.energbank.md
REFERENCES TO CHAPTER 5
1. Legea nr. 206 din 07.07.2006 privind susinerea sectorului ntreprinderilor
mici i mijlocii.
2. Legea nr. 243-XV din 08.07.2004 privind asigurarea subvenionat a riscurilor de producie n agricultur.
3. Bulgac V. Modaliti de finanare a agenilor economici din domeniul agriculturii. n: International Scientific and Practical Conferance, Economic Growth
in Conditions of Internationalization, V - th edition, vol.I, october 21-22, 2010.
Chiinau, 2010, pag. 437-439.
4. Chapman, R., Slaymaker, T. ICTs and Rural Development: review of the Literature, Current Interventions and Opportunities for Action. In Working Paper
No. 192, Overseas Development Institute, London, 2002.
319
320