Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Desalination
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/desal
Reactive dyes rejection and textile efuent treatment study using ultraltration and
nanoltration processes
A. Aouni a, 1, C. Fersi a, c,, B. Cuartas-Uribe b, 2, A. Bes-Pa b, 2, M.I. Alcaina-Miranda b, 2, M. Dhahbi a, 1
a
b
c
Water and Membrane Technologies Laboratory, CERTE, BP 273, Soliman 8020 Tunisia
Department of Chemical and Nuclear Engineering, Polytechnic University of Valencia, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain
Method and Technical Analysis Laboratory, INRAP, Sidi Thabet 2020, Tunisia
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 30 November 2011
Received in revised form 18 April 2012
Accepted 22 April 2012
Available online 14 May 2012
Keywords:
Ultraltration
Nanoltration
Reactive dyes
Rinsing wastewater
a b s t r a c t
Ultraltration and nanoltration processes were used to treat synthetic reactive dyes aqueous solutions and a
raw textile efuent supplied from rinsing baths of Spanish textile industry. The inuence of the reactive dyes
molecular weights and the effect of the used membranes types and cut-offs were investigated with regard to
the permeate ux at different transmembrane pressures (27 bar for UF and 415 bar for NF). The extent of
colour retention, COD and conductivity was determined in order to monitor the membrane's separation efciencies aiming at waste water treatment, water reuse and chemical usage minimisation. High COD retentions (80100%) were achieved using UF and NF processes. Good conductivity rates (80%) and high COD
and colour retention rates (> 90%) were obtained for both NF 200 and NF 270 membranes for all studied
dyes solutions. An improvement of the rinsing wastewater quality was obtained using UF and NF processes.
2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The characteristics of wastewater from textile processing operations are comprehensively reviewed. The categorisation of wastewaters proceeds through a consideration of the nature of the various
industrial processes employed by the industry and the chemicals associated with these operations. Chemical pollutants arise both from
the raw material itself and a broad range of additives used to produce
the nished product. The industrial categories considered include
sizing and weaving, scouring, bleaching, mercerising, carbonising, dyeing and nishing. Pollutants of concern range from non-biodegradable
highly-coloured organic dyes to pesticides from special nishes such
as insect-proong [1].
Textile industries consume large volumes of water and chemicals
for wet processing of textiles. The chemical reagents used are very diverse in chemical composition, ranging from inorganic compounds to
polymers and organic products [2,3]. Chitin and chitosan were used in
lobster shell wastes for colour removal from aqueous solutions [4].
The presence of very low concentrations of dyes in efuent is highly
visible and undesirable [5]. Due to their chemical structure, dyes are
resistant to fading on exposure to light, water and many chemicals
[6,7].
Corresponding author at: Method and Technical Analysis Laboratory, INRAP, Sidi
Thabet 2020, Tunisia. Tel.: + 216 71 537 666; fax: + 216 71 537 767.
E-mail address: cheimafersi@yahoo.fr (C. Fersi).
1
Tel.: + 216 79 325 798; fax: + 216 79 325 802.
2
Tel.: + 34 96 3879633; fax: + 34 96 3877639.
0011-9164/$ see front matter 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.desal.2012.04.022
Many dyes are difcult to decolourise due to their complex structure and synthetic origin.
There are many structural varieties, such as, azo, diazo, anthroquinone,
triphenylmethane, phetalocyanine, stilbene, and metal complex dyes.
Decolouration of textile dye efuent does not occur when treated aerobically by municipal sewerage systems [8].
The conventional method of textile wastewater treatment consists
of chemical coagulation (using ferrous, lime and polyelectrolytes), biological treatment followed by activated carbon adsorption. The conventional coagulation process generates huge volume of hazardous
sludge and poses a problem of sludge disposal. In order to meet the
legal requirements for the discharge of textile wastewater, researchers
are attempting a combination of two or more treatment methods for
the complete and successful removal. Combination of electrochemical
treatment and chemical coagulation [9], combined chemical coagulation, electrochemical oxidation, and activated sludge process [10],
and combination of electrochemical method, chemical coagulation,
and ion exchange [11] were reported for textile efuent treatment
to comply with the legal requirements or for reuse standards. Each
treatment method has its own advantages and disadvantages, and
the selection of the method mainly depends on the treatment target
to be achieved.
The uctuating compound concentrations and ow rates make the
conventional processes quite insufcient for the treatment of textile
wastewaters, especially for colour removal [12,13].
The discharge regulations are becoming more stringent, and there is
a growing tendency and interest in the advanced treatment methods
like ozonation, photo catalysis, and membrane processes for a better
treatment of the textile wastewaters [14].
88
NaO3SOCH2CH2O2S
SO2CH2CH2OSO3Na
OH
N
NaO3S
H2N
N
SO3Na
NH2
SO3Na
Cl
N
N
SO3Na
SO3Na
N
Ph
HO
N
O
HN
N
Me
NaO3S
Fig. 2. Chemical structure of Everzol Red (MRed = 788 g mol 1).
SO2CH2CH2OSO3Na
Fig. 3. Chemical structure of Everzol Blue (MBlue = 626 g mol 1).
MW of dye
pH
Conductivity
Colour
COD
[Dye]
[NaCl]
(S cm 1)
(mg L 1)
(mg L 1)
(mg L 1)
Everzol Black
solution
Everzol Blue
solution
Everzol Red
solution
991
9.89
2490
2.05
566
600
500
626
10.46
1407
1.92
450
600
500
788
10.27
2240
1.76
470
600
500
Cp
1
Cf
!
2
Table 2
Textile wastewater characteristics.
Parameter
pH
Conductivity
Turbidity
COD
Particle size distribution
TDS
Colour
Cl
SO42
Ca2+
Mg2+
Na+
Value
(S cm 1)
(NTU)
(mg L 1)
(m)
(mg L 1)
1
(mg L )
(mg L 1)
(mg L 1)
(mg L 1)
(mg L 1)
7.11
3840
4.02
708
0.768
3137
0.12
>125
28
42
18.6
1008
89
90
Table 3
Membrane specications.
Membrane
UF 10 kDa
UF 1 kDa
NF 200
NF 270
Manufacturer
Material
Surface charge (pH 7)
Maximum operating pressure (bar)
Maximum operating temperature (C)
pH range
Cut-off (Da)
Contact angle ()
Isoelectric point
Roughness (nm)
Pore diameter size (nm)
Thickness (nm)
Rhodia orelis
Polyethersulfone
Neutral
7
50
314
10,000
56 38 [52]
N.D.
12.7 1.3A [52]
1100 [58]
150 103 [58]
Synder ltration
Polyethersulfone
Neutral
8
50
211
1000
56 38 [52]
N.D.
12.7 1.3A [52]
1100 [58]
150 103 [58]
Dow/Filmtec
Polyamide
Negative [51]
41
45
310
200300
30.3 [53]
4.3
5.19 [53]
0.93a
1.81 103a
Dow/Filmtec
Polyamide
Negative [51]
41
45
310
200300
51.4 [56]
3.3 [57]
19.80 [57]
0.84 [55]
1.87 103 [59]
100
90
80
RBlack (%)
70
60
50
COD(Black)
40
Colour(Black)
30
Conductivity(Black)
20
10
0
0
J0 (Water) = 62.8 P
Jp (L h-1 m-2)
390
360
330
300
270
240
210
180
150
90
80
70
60
50
40
COD(Black)
20
Colour(Black)
10
Conductivity(Black)
P (bar)
Fig. 6. Retention rates as a function of transmembrane pressure after Everzol Black solution treatment using UF membranes ([Dye] = 600 mg L 1; [NaCl] = 500 mg L 1).
A) UF 10 kDa; B) UF 1 kDa.
P (bar)
30
J0 (Water) = 3.7 P
Jp (Black) = 1.5 P - 0.2
25
Jp (L h-1 m-2)
120
90
60
30
0
100
30
P (bar)
RBlack (%)
91
20
15
10
5
0
0
P (bar)
Fig. 5. Permeate ux of Everzol dyes solutions versus transmembrane pressure using UF
membranes ([Dye] = 600 mg L 1; [NaCl]= 500 mg L 1). A) UF 10 kDa; B) UF 1 kDa.
92
100
90
80
RBlue (%)
70
60
COD(Blue)
50
Colour(Blue)
40
Conductivity(Blue)
30
20
10
0
0
P (bar)
100
90
80
RBlue (%)
70
60
50
40
COD(Blue)
30
Colour(Blue)
20
Conductivity(Blue)
10
100
90
0
0
80
P (bar)
RRed (%)
COD(Red)
60
Colour(Red)
50
Conductivity(Red)
40
30
20
10
0
0
P (bar)
100
90
80
70
RRed (%)
Fig. 7. Retention rates as a function of transmembrane pressure after Everzol Blue solution treatment using UF membranes ([Dye] = 600 mg L 1; [NaCl] = 500 mg L 1).
A) UF 10 kDa; B) UF 1 kDa.
70
60
50
40
30
COD(Red)
20
Colour(Red)
Conductivity(Red)
10
0
The same reactive dyes solutions using Everzol Black, Blue and Red
dyes and NaCl were treated using two nanoltration membranes (NF
200 and NF 270) which are described in Table 3. The transmembrane
pressure was varied from 3 to 12 bar during each experiment. The variation of permeate uxes of Everzol dyes solutions with transmembrane
P (bar)
Fig. 8. Retention rates as a function of transmembrane pressure after Everzol Red solution treatment using UF membranes ([Dye] = 600 mg L 1; [NaCl] = 500 mg L 1).
A) UF 10 kDa; B) UF 1 kDa.
A
240
J0 (Water) = 12.6 P
Jp (Black) = 12.3 P - 16.8
210
Jp (L h-1 m-2)
180
150
120
90
60
30
0
0
10
12
14
16
18
P (bar)
B
J0 (Water) = 15.6 P
240
210
Jp (L h-1 m-2)
180
150
93
120
90
60
30
100
0
0
10
12
14
16
18
90
80
COD(Black)
Colour(Black)
10
Conductivity(Black)
0
0
10
12
14
16
P (bar)
B
100
RBlack (%)
RBlack (%)
P (bar)
90
COD(Black)
80
Colour(Black)
Conductivity(Black)
10
0
0
10
12
14
16
P (bar)
Fig. 10. Retention rates as a function of transmembrane pressure after Everzol Black solution treatment using NF membranes ([Dye] = 600 mg L 1; [NaCl] = 500 mg L 1).
A) NF 200; B) NF 270.
94
100
90
90
RBlue (%)
RRed (%)
100
80
80
COD(Red)
COD(Blue)
Colour(Red)
Colour(Black)
10
Conductivity(Red)
10
Conductivity(Black)
0
0
10
12
14
16
10
12
14
16
P (bar)
P (bar)
100
90
90
RBlue (%)
RRed (%)
100
80
80
COD(Red)
COD(Blue)
Colour(Red)
Colour(Blue)
Conductivity(Blue)
10
Conductivity(Red)
10
0
0
0
10
12
14
16
10
12
14
16
P (bar)
P (bar)
Fig. 11. Retention rates as a function of transmembrane pressure after Everzol Blue
solution treatment using NF membranes ([Dye] = 600 mg L 1; [NaCl] = 500 mg L 1).
A) NF 200; B) NF 270.
Fig. 12. Retention rates as a function of transmembrane pressure after Everzol Red
solution treatment using NF membranes ([Dye] = 600 mg L 1; [NaCl] = 500 mg L 1).
A) NF 200; B) NF 270.
water produced is called dye bath water and after washing the waste
water generated is called wash water. Dye Bath contains higher solids
in the range 45% whereas wash water contains only 0.51% solids.
The main characteristics of this sample were given previously in
Table 2. It can be observed that this efuent presents particularly high
conductivity (l4 mS cm 1) and high COD (708 mg L 1) which
causes environmental problems and makes impossible its reuse.
30
25
Jp (L h-1 m-2)
J0 (Water) = 3.7 P
Jp (Rinsing) = 2.0 P - 0.5
20
15
10
5
0
0
P (bar)
Fig. 13. Rinsing wastewater permeate ux versus transmembrane pressure using UF
1 kDa membrane.
100
100
90
90
80
80
70
70
60
RRinsing (%)
RRinsing (%)
COD
Colour
Conductivity
50
40
95
60
50
40
30
30
20
20
10
10
COD
Colour
Conductivity
0
0
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
P (bar)
P (bar)
Fig. 14. Retention rates as a function of transmembrane pressure after rinsing wastewater treatment using UF 1 kDa membrane.
Fig. 16. Retention rates as a function of transmembrane pressure after rinsing wastewater treatment using NF 270 membrane.
The variation of water and permeate uxes with the transmembrane pressure is presented in Fig. 13. Similar results were observed
comparing to Everzol Blue solution using the same ultraltration
membrane.
Fig. 14 illustrates COD, colour and conductivity retention rates of
the rinsing wastewater after ultraltration process. More than 90%
of colour was retained by UF 1 kDa membrane for a transmembrane
pressure varied from 3 to 7 bar. Good COD retention was also
obtained (70% at 3 bar and more than 80% at 7 bar).
The same gure demonstrates that ultraltration didn't highly improve the quality of the studied textile efuent in terms of conductivity. In fact, conductivity retention rates didn't exceed 30% even at high
transmembrane pressure.
These results conrm the efciency of ultraltration process in
COD reduction and offer the possibility of using this process as pretreatment to improve the waste water quality.
COD, colour and conductivity retention rates of the rinsing wastewater after nanoltration process are shown in Fig. 16. More than 95%
of COD retention and more than 98% of colour retention were observed for all transmembrane pressure range using NF 270 membrane. It can be also observed that an important improvement was
occurred for conductivity retention rates. In fact, this parameter increases with the transmembrane pressure and reaches 71% at
15 bar. These results demonstrate that nanoltration highly improves
the rinsing wastewater quality.
J0 (Water) = 9.7 P
160
Jp (L h-1 m-2)
140
4. Conclusions
In this study, membrane separation efciencies were evaluated by
determining three parameters retentions (colour, COD and conductivity) for treating textile model dyes solutions and real rinsing efuents. Addition of chemicals was not required, to favorise better
permeate quality. A step forward in water treatment is to obtain an
efuent quality suitable to produce reusable water.
The following conclusions are made based on this experimental
study:
High COD retention rates (>80%) were obtained for all dyes solutions using both UF 10 kDa and UF 1 kDa membranes.
A total decolourisation was observed for blue and red dyes using UF
1 kDa membrane.
Good conductivity rates (80%) and high COD and colour retention
rates (>90%) were obtained for both NF 200 and NF 270 membranes for all studied dyes solutions.
An improvement of the rinsing wastewater quality was obtained
using UF 1 kDa in terms of COD and colour.
NF process was chosen as an appropriate and an efcient process for
reducing conductivity, COD and colour in industrial efuent, to assure
constant good water quality demanded by textile nishing processes.
120
References
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
P (bar)
96
[7] G. Mckay, Waste colour removal from textile efuents, Am. Dyest Rep. 68 (1979)
2936.
[8] N. Willmott, J. Guthrie, G. Nelson, The biotechnology approach to colour removal
from textile efuent, JSDC 14 (1998) 3841.
[9] S.H. Lin, C.F. Peng, Treatment of textile wastewater by electrochemical method,
Water Res. 28 (1994) 277282.
[10] S.H. Lin, C.F. Peng, Continuous treatment of textile wastewater by combined coagulation, electrochemical oxidation and activated sludge, Water Res. 30 (1996)
587592.
[11] S.H. Lin, M.L. Chen, Treatment of textile wastewater by chemical methods for
reuse, Water Res. 31 (1997) 868876.
[12] H. Shu, C. Huang, Degradation of commercial azo dyes in water using ozonation
and UV enhanced ozonation process, Chemosphere 31 (1995) 38133825.
[13] H. Abdul Aziz, S. Alias, M.N. Adlan, A.H. Faridah, M. Asaari, Shahrir Zahari, Colour removal from landll leachate by coagulation and occulation processes, Bioresour.
Technol. 98 (2007) 218220.
[14] C. Tang, V. Chen, Nanoltration of textile wastewater for water reuse, Des 143
(2002) 1120.
[15] A. Aouni, C. Fersi, M. Ben Sik Ali, M. Dhahbi, Treatment of textile wastewater by a
hybrid electrocoagulation/nanoltration process, J. Hazard. Mater. 168 (2009)
868874.
[16] C. Fersi, L. Gzara, M. Dhahbi, Flux decline study for textile wastewater treatment
by membrane processes, Des 244 (2009) 321332.
[17] C. Fersi, M. Dhahbi, Treatment of textile plant efuent by ultraltration and/or
nanoltration for water reuse, Des 222 (2008) 263271.
[18] C. Fersi, L. Gzara, M. Dhahbi, Treatment of textile efuents by membrane technologies, Des 185 (2005) 18251835.
[19] A. Bes-Pi, A. Iborra-Clar, C. Garca-Figueruelo, S. Barredo-Damas, M.I. AlcainaMiranda, J.A. Mendoza-Roca, M.I. Iborra-Clar, Comparison of three NF membranes
for the reuse of secondary textile efuents, Des 241 (2009) 17.
[20] A. Bes-Pi, M.I. Iborra-Clar, A. Iborra-Clar, J.A. Mendoza-Roca, B. Cuartas-Uribe,
M.I. Alcaina-Miranda, Nanoltration of textile industry wastewater using a physicochemical process as a pre-treatment, Des 178 (2005) 343349.
[21] J.M. Gozlvez-Zafrilla, D. Sanz-Escribano, J. Lora-Garca, M.C. Len Hidalgo,
Nanoltration of secondary efuent for wastewater reuse in the textile industry,
Des 222 (2008) 272279.
[22] M. Brik, P. Schoeberl, B. Chamam, R. Braun, W. Fuchs, Advanced treatment of textile wastewater towards reuse using a membrane bioreactor, Process. Biochem.
41 (2006) 17511757.
[23] H. Yen, S. Kang, Mu-Hoe, Separation of textile efuents by polyamide membrane
for reuse, Polym. Test. 21 (2002) 539543.
[24] C. Suksaroj, M. Hran, C. Allgre, F. Persin, Treatment of textile plant efuent by
nanoltration and/or reverse osmosis for water reuse, Des 178 (2005) 333341.
[25] N. Zaghbani, A. Haane, M. Dhahbi, Removal of Eriochrome Blue Black R from
wastewater using micellar-enhanced ultraltration, J. Hazard. Mater. 168
(2009) 14171421.
[26] N. Zaghbani, A. Haane, M. Dhahbi, Removal of Safranin T from wastewater using
micellar enhanced ultraltration, Des 222 (2008) 348356.
[27] N. Zaghbani, A. Haane, M. Dhahbi, Separation of methylene blue from aqueous
solution by micellar enhanced ultraltration, Sep. Purif. Technol. 55 (2007)
117124.
[28] K. Majewska-Nowak, The effect of a polyelectrolyte on the efciency of dyesurfactant solution treatment by ultraltration, Des 221 (2008) 395404.
[29] J.J. Porter, R.S. Porter, Filtration studies of selected anionic dyes using asymmetric
titanium dioxide membranes on porous stainless-steel tubes, J. Membr. Sci. 101
(1995) 6781.
[30] A.L. Ahmad, S.W. Puasa, Reactive dyes decolourization from an aqueous solution
by combined coagulation/micellar-enhanced ultraltration process, Chem. Eng.
J. 132 (2007) 257265.
[31] Y. He, G. Li, H. Wang, Z. Jiang, J. Zhao, H. Su, Q. Huang, Experimental study on the
rejection of salt and dye with cellulose acetate nanoltration membrane, J. Taiwan
Inst. Chem. Eng. 40 (2009) 289295.
[32] I. Petrini, N.P.R. Andersen, S. ostar-Turk, A.M. Le Marechal, The removal of reactive
dye printing compounds using nanoltration, Dyes Pigm. 74 (2007) 512518.
[33] A. Akbari, S. Desclaux, J.C. Rouch, J.C. Remigy, Application of nanoltration hollow
bre membranes, developed by photografting, to treatment of anionic dye solutions, J. Membr. Sci. 297 (2007) 243252.
[34] B. Van der Bruggen, L. Braeken, C. Vandecasteele, Flux decline in nanoltration
due to adsorption of organic compounds, Sep. Purif. Technol. 29 (2002) 2331.