BOOK OF AUTHORSHIP OF JEANE KÁTIA DOS SANTOS HISSES

I, Jeane Kátia Dos Santos Hiss, I am the author of the book “the Son of
God to the light of the Sacred Holy Writs” and, I am in search of an
publishing company that wants to bet in this dream.
When I small age had taught to me that Jesus is God and, questions of
the type: “as It can be God and, still thus to be the Son of God? ”, they
fervilhavam in my mind of girl, who wanted to understand the reason of the
things. With passing of the years, when I already was in 4º Period of the
Theological Seminary, these same doubts had come back to bother me, and
then, I could not more silence these my questionings, reason for which, I dared
to externar them.
First, I questioned the Bible to the light of the historical, archaeological
evidences, etc [if these give or reasons to me not to believe] e, having
perceived that yes, then, the next step was a species of test of the nine: “It has
contradictions in the Bible” - To the first sight, yes! But, for more incredible
than it seems, it discovered that it is exactly in these apparent contradictions
that are the answers to the questionings that I had.
E, in the end of the accounts, leaving of the doubt and, analyzing of is the
faith, could discover that my faith resists a frank questioning and, has reason
of being; that is, one is not about an intellectual suicide.
My book appeared in reason of this questioning that I had concerning the
Deity of the Son of God. I was to the hunting of answers and, what I found, to
my surprise, it came to still more fortify the faith that I had in it; this why, as
already it was said previously, I discovered that the answers that I searched,
gifts in the apparent contradictions of the Biblical story meet; then, I perceived
that in the truth they are not contradictions. In them, I trod the way had taken
that me to the answers that had silenced of a time for all this my questioning.
 I consider myself to deal with it the question of the generation of the Son
of God, who if gave before the creation of the world and, to also deal with the
implications of this affirmation to the Christian life.
The Son of God is God in fact and of right! In a simple language I go to
show to the light of the Sacred Holy Writs, where moment and what was
necessary so that this occurred.
God in fact e, therefore, coigual, coeterno and cossubstancial with the
Father - to the exception of the autoexistência, the Son of God is everything
what the Father is. In elapsing of the chapters, the reader will go to discover
what he made with that It, God in fact, came if to also become God of right
and, of that forms this became it the great example for all the humanity and, as
It fulfilled here in the land all its ministry [life, death and resurrection].
He has in my book an analysis that I make of the arguments of theologian
Louis Berkhof. E, I will go to show why the Aryan conclusions concerning
Jesus were maken a mistake.
Jesus is perpetual! But, what he is being argued here is of that forms if of
Its eternity. I aim at to fully show the reason of the Son to be The holy ghost
and, to have all if become the cause of the salvation of that one that to believe
- the only way that takes the God, as the proper Jesus affirmed exactly
concerning itself. Reading my book, the reader will be able to understand the
reason of Jesus to have said not to know the one that day and hour if would
give its coming.
Jesus is preexisting and everything what it exists was made by It and for
It. However, the reader will see in the following chapters, that difference
between being exists preexisting and to be autoexistente [I am astonished to
discover that when denying its autoexistência I do not contradict it, before I
confirm] to it. Moreover, the reader will go to discover because they are not the
miracles that Jesus carried through that they testify of Its Deity and, what really
testifies this.
Fact is that my book does not deny nothing what the Bible says regarding
Jesus. It only denies what it does not affirm Its respect.
The book is divided in three parts: The first part among others things will
go to approach the “x” of the question, followed of an analysis of the Divine
perspective of the things and, it will bring an analysis of the arguments of
theologian Louis Berkhof concerning the subject; finishing with a
communication that it aims at to demonstrate, to the light of the Old and New
Will, that the Bible does not affirm the autoexistência of Jesus. The second
part has a more practical application, therefore, it aims at to demonstrate the
implications of this discovery in the Christian life; finishing with the reason of It
to be God in fact and right. The third part will deal with the question of the
Trindade, and, among others things, d.C will go to show the reason not to
agree to the arguments defended for the Parents of the Church of 1º century.
It will still bring, the creed according to Sacred Holy Writs, finishing with my
personal deposition.
Amongst that already they had read my book has priests, theologians,
shepherds, Jews, professors of college, etc and, he has been sufficiently
praised for that it had had this previous access. It is a book strong based in the
Sacred Holy Writs as a whole [when I say this, I mention the Biblical texts to it
that deal with the subject in question]. A book of that it dared to almost
question two a thousand years of history, and this, why it needed answers to a
frank questioning.
My book is not a auto-biography! It is a book of theological matrix e, as
the proper heading suggests, is about an analysis of the Son of God to the
light of the Sacred Holy Writs. Everything what I made was to leave the Bible
[whose so singular characteristics had been cited by Josh McDowell] to speak
for same itself. Reading it, the reader will feel itself made familiar to the many
Biblical texts that are cited, until why, the objective is to show what always it
was there e, did not perceive.
C.S. Lewis, author of “the chronicles of Nárnia”, in its book “Christianity
Straightforward”, makes the following commentary: “All had advised to me not
to say to them what I go to say… They affirm: `The common reader does not
want to know of Theology; it only gives the simple and practical religion to it. 'I
rejected the advice. I do not find that the common reader is a fool. Theology
means `the Science of Deus', and believes that all man who thinks on God
would like to have on it the notion clearest and more he needs possible. Vocês
is not children: why, then, to treat to them as such”.
They had the same said me in relation to my book, but, I fully agree to
C.S. Lewis.
The truth is that many times we place in them in the defensive when
ahead of presumptions attacks what we believe e, we do not stop to think, in
quão beneficial such questionings can be to our growth and matureness in the
faith. E, this defensive attitude happen for not in giving account to them, that a
small doubt not cured today, can tomorrow be the causer of an incredulity
abyss.
However, if to analyze the Bible more intently, we will see that at no
moment it invites in them to open hand of our intellect, in order to hug a blind
faith. Until why, faith for faith, has many “faiths”, he is not same? E, I was not
made use to hug a faith that if did not disclose worthy of being hugged e,
therefore, I questioned. In the end of the accounts, most interesting of
everything, he was to discover that my faith, resists this questioning all.
E, not obstante, to be the faith an important factor, more important still is
the “object of faith” to who it is directed. Until why, it has the ones that nail:
“they believe in any thing, but, believe”, as if the faith was a mere amulet
against which they could be leaned. It has the ones that creem in Buddha, etc.
The Muslen, in turn, are made use to die for what they creem. Ahead of this, I
arrive at the conclusion of that even so, the faith has a paper basic in our lives,
it only in the ones of the guarantees if directed to a “object of faith” that really
is worthy of credit.
We have in the Bible the example of Lucas. For its writings, one
perceives that it had this understanding and care. He observes what it says:
“Since many have undertaken to make a coordinate narration of
the facts that enter we if had carried through, as us they had transmitted
the ones that since the principle had been eyewitnesses and ministers
of the word, also me, after having investigated everything carefully since
the start, he seemed me well, ó dear Teófilo, to write you a narration in
sequence, so that you fully know the truth of the things where you were
instructed.”. [Lucas 1:1 - 4].
Lucas wise person the importance of if first having this investigativo care
of the facts, until why, in the first centuries of the church, the Christians very
had been pursued, for the Jews and, later for the Roman empire. In the
occasion, many Christians had been died for love to the Evangelho; E, Lucas
perceived to be necessary to show the facts as they had happened to these
people who were being so cruel pursued. E, valley to remember, that the
evangelistas, many times, had looked for to remember to the new Christians,
who they themselves had been eyewitnesses of the things that they wrote to
them.
“You prove and you forbid that you it is good”, the Sacred Holy Writs say!
E, continues, saying: “before santificai in your hearts the Christ as Sir; e stay
prepared to answer with mansidão and fear all that one that to ask for the
reason to you of the faith that has in you” [I Peter 3:15] - thing that I would not
have conditions to make today, if I had not been sincere with same me in the
occasion where to this he bothered me doubt. E, as Philip Yancey says: “The
invisibilidade of God is the guarantee of that I will try moments of doubts…
Why, then, the church faces the doubt as enemy? The doubt always walks
with the faith; after all, in the certainty, who would need faith”
Jeane Kátia Dos Santos Hisses
Bachelor in Theology for the Joined College of Vitória/ES
Formed in Clinical Psychoanalysis for
Useful Theological college of Saber [FATUS]

My twitter: http://twitter.com/jeanekss