Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Journal of Chromatography A
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chroma
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 7 August 2015
Received in revised form 31 October 2015
Accepted 9 November 2015
Available online 14 November 2015
Keywords:
Large-volume sample stacking
LVSS
Anion selective exhaustive injection
ASEI
Sweeping
Urine
Abused drug
On-line preconcentration
a b s t r a c t
The objective of this study was to establish a practical and reliable analytical method for monitoring
trace amounts of 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and its metabolites in biological samples. A novel
on-line preconcentration capillary electrophoresis method combining large volume sample injection,
anion selective exhaustive injection and sweeping was developed to enhance analytical sensitivity.
A background buffer composed with 30 mM phosphate buffer (pH 2.5) containing 40% methanol and
100 mM SDS was used to suppress the electroosmotic ow of the uncoated fused silica capillary
(40 cm 50 m i.d.). High conductivity buffer (200 mM phosphate, pH 2.5) was injected for analyte accumulation. The samples, prepared in phosphate buffer or Tris buffer, were introduced by hydrodynamic
injection and electrokinetic injection. After sweeping, the separation was performed in micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) mode at 15 kV. During the method validation, the coefcient of
determination of the regression curve was measured at greater than 0.993, and the relative standard
deviation and relative error were lower than 11.06% and 9.24%, respectively. Under optimized conditions, an improvement of up to 2000-fold higher sensitivity was achieved. This method was applied to
the analysis of urine samples, indicating that it could be satisfactorily utilized in the toxicological and
clinical monitoring of cannabis.
2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Cannabis is one of the most commonly abused drugs in the
world with its increased use due to a low perceived risk [1]. In
Taiwan, cannabis is classied as a second-class drug of abuse and
its use is strictly banned. The nationwide statistical data from
the National Health Administration in 2014 showed that cannabis
ranked 8th in the most commonly abused drugs in Taiwan. Compared to 2013, cannabis abuse increased by 4.5%, particularly with
young people. In some countries, cannabis was used as medicine to
relieve pain, promote appetite in AIDS patients, reduce nausea and
vomiting in patients undergoing chemotherapy, and treat neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinsons and Huntingtons diseases
[2,3]. However, long-term use of cannabis may cause problems
in the respiratory tract, neurological and cardiovascular systems,
and lead to physical dependence. Withdrawal symptoms include
Corresponding author at: School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, China Medical University, No. 91, Hsueh-Shih Rd., Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
E-mail address: yihulin@mail.cmu.edu.tw (Y.-H. Lin).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2015.11.032
0021-9673/ 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
227
chromatography exhibit good sensitivity and specicity, but timeconsuming pre-column derivatization is unavoidable [10,11]. The
rst application of capillary electrophoresis (CE) in the analysis
of cannabinoids in hair was reported using non-aqueous CE with
electrochemical detection (ECD) [12]. With the high selectivity
of ECD, the lower limit of detection of THC can be decreased to
37 ng/mL. A CE-MS method was reported for the direct analysis
of THC-COOH and its glucuronide in urine. The total analysis time
including sample-pretreatment was approximately 30 min [13].
In spite of many advantages, such as low consumption of
reagents, simplicity and high-efciency, CE has lower sensitivity
due to the short optical length and small sample size. Many
on-line preconcentration methods have been developed in order
to increase sensitivity. Several to thousand-folds improvement
in detection sensitivity was achieved without any alternation to
the current instrumentation. Sweeping mode was introduced in
1998 with a focusing effect that was due to the pseudostationary
phase penetrating the sample zone and picking and accumulating analytes [14]. The combination of sweeping with other
preconcentration methods provides an additive effect on sensitivity. Various methods including dynamic pH junctionsweeping
[15,16], selective-exhaustive injectionsweeping (SEI-sweep)
[17,18], transient trapping (tr-trapping) [19] and analyte focusing
by micelle collapse (AFMC) [20] were successfully established,
which expanded the application of CE to many elds. Among
these methods, SEI-sweep showed the greatest improvements to
sensitivity [21].
Owing to extensive metabolism of cannabinoids after consumption, trace amounts of the unchanged drug and various
metabolites were found in the body. We attempted to apply
the anion selective-exhaustive injectionsweeping micellar electrokinetic chromatography (ASEI-sweeping-MEKC) model for the
analysis of THC and its major metabolites. Although all analytes
were baseline separated, the detection sensitivity of THC and THCOH was unsatisfactory. In solution, analytes with varying degrees
228
2.4. CE system
A Beckman P/ACE MDQ System equipped with a photo diode
array detector was used. This CE method was performed in an
uncoated fused-silica capillary (Polymicro Technologies, Phoenix,
AZ, USA) of 50 m i.d. and 30 cm effective length (40 cm, total
length). The UV absorbance wavelength was set at 214 nm. New
capillaries were preconditioned prior to use with MeOH for 10 min,
water for 10 min, 1 M HCl solution for 10 min, water for 10 min,
1 M NaOH solution and water for 10 min. Before daily analysis
and between each run, the capillary was rinsed with 0.1 M NaOH
for 5 min, water for 5 min, and running buffer for 5 min. A pressure of 20 psi was used for all the preconditioning and rinsing
steps.
General electrophoresis procedures are described as follows.
The background buffer consisting of 30 mM phosphate (NaH2 PO4 ,
pH 2.5), 100 mM SDS and 40% MeOH (v/v) was used to rinse the
capillary. Next, high conductivity buffer (HCB, phosphate buffer
200 mM, pH 2.5) was injected at 0.5 psi for 1 min. After the HCB,
a large volume sample was hydrodynamically introduced (0.5 psi,
3 min), followed by electrokinetically loading of additional analyte
for 6 min at a voltage of 2.5 kV. Finally, the inlet of capillary was
switched into the background buffer and a voltage of 15 kV was
applied for separation.
The concept of the LVSI-ASEI-sweeping MEKC model is illustrated in Fig. 2. Initially, the capillary was rinsed with acidic
background buffer (pH 2.5) to suppress the electroosmotic ow
(EOF). A plug of the high-conductivity buffer (HCB) was then hydrodynamically injected into the capillary (Fig. 2A). In this study,
samples were introduced by combining two injection modes. First,
a large volume sample prepared in phosphate buffer at pH 2.5 was
loaded with pressure (at 0.5 psi, 3 min) after the HCB, as seen in
Fig. 2B. Then, a negative voltage (2.5 kV) was applied for 6 min,
and an additional amount of anionic analytes prepared in Tris buffer
(pH 10.3) were electrokinetically injected. Due to the different dissociation states in both adjoining electrolytes, the mobility levels
of the anionic analytes gradually decreased when entering the capillary and further accumulated in the acidic sample zone (Fig. 2C).
After sample injection, the inlet of the capillary was switched to the
background buffer and a negative voltage was applied. The anionic
micelles entered the capillary from the cathodic end and swept
and stacked the sample into a narrow band (Fig. 2D). Finally, the
separation was performed by MEKC mode, as shown in Fig. 2E.
3.2. Optimization of LVSI-ASEI-sweeping MEKC model
Several parameters were evaluated before achieving higher resolution and optimal conditions, including the pH and concentration
of the phosphate buffer, modier amounts and the concentration
of SDS in the background buffer, as well as the optimization of the
HCB plug, sample matrix composition, sample injection time and
separation voltage.
3.2.1. Optimization of sample injection
Relative to THC-COOH (pKa 4.5), THC and THC-OH are weaker
acids with pKa values of approximately 9.6, and thus, it is hard
for them to compete with THC-COOH while using electrokinetic
injection. In contrast, pressure injection provides equal probability for all analytes. This study combines LVSI and ASEI modes to
increase sample loading for improved sensitivity. In order to avoid
the dissociation of analytes and to suppress EOF, samples used for
2
0.02 AU
1
3
Abs.
(D) 6 min
(C) 5 min
(B) 4 min
(A) 0 min
10 11 12 13 14 15
Time (min)
Fig. 3. Electropherograms of various sample electrokinetic injection times at
2.5 kV. Sample concentrations: THC, THC-OH 1 g/mL; THC-COOH 0.4 g/mL. CE
Conditions: background buffer, 30 mM phosphate (pH 2.5) with 40% methanol and
100 mM SDS; HCB, 200 mM phosphate, 0.5 psi for 1 min; dynamic injection, 0.5 psi
for 3 min; separation voltage, 15 kV. Migration order, 1: THC, 2: THC-COOH, 3:
THC-OH.
229
highest signal response was obtained when Tris was used as the
sample matrix. As a result, 25 mM Tris was chosen as the buffer
for the sample matrix in our subsequent analyses. Previous studies have shown that ACN has a signicant effect on the sample
stacking efciency [2325]. Thus, the addition of ACN in the range
of 040% (v/v) to the sample matrix was also examined in our
system. The result indicated that the presence of ACN increased
the stacking ability, with 30% ACN providing the best improvement. Therefore, we added 30% ACN (v/v) to the sample matrix
in the following experiments. When considering the inuence of
injection voltage and injection time on ASEI, we found that variations in injection voltages (2.5, 3, 4, and 5 kV) did not result
in a signicant change in signal intensity, yet the analyte peak
response increased with increasing electrokinetic injection time
(Fig. 3). However, peak broadening was also observed when the
injection time was increased to 7 min. Taken together, based on
the detection sensitivity and resolution, samples used for ASEI were
electrokinetically injected into the capillary at 2.5 kV for 6 min in
the LVSI-ASEI MEKC mode.
3.2.2. Optimization of sweeping and separation conditions
The proposed use of a preinjection plug was reported in 1998
[26]. The HCB has a high conductivity and low electronic eld that
reduced the electrophoretic velocities of analytes and micelles.
Therefore, it allows for the injection of sample ions for a long period
of time and creates a narrow stacked zone [21]. The inuence of HCB
(200 mM phosphate buffer with pH 2.5, 1 min by 0.5 psi) on separations was evaluated. It was found that, the peak intensity appeared
to increase when an HCB plug was applied; therefore, an HCB plug
was used in the subsequent experiment. According to the formula
derived from the sweeping model Isweep = Iinj [1/(1 + k)],where k is
the retention factor, and Isweep and Iinj are the length of zones after
sweeping and sample injection [27], higher concentrations of SDS
may result in larger retention factors and shorter sweep zones. SDS
also plays an important role in the separation. The effects of the
concentration of SDS were studied in the range of 75150 mM. As
anticipated, the total analysis time was shortened, and peak heights
were raised as the concentration of SDS increased. Nevertheless,
poor resolution resulted from higher SDS concentrations. Hence,
100 mM SDS was chosen for use in further experiments.
In addition, the separation of analytes was strongly affected by
the composition of background buffer. Several parameters such as
the concentration (20100 mM) and pH (2, 2.5 and 3) of phosphate
buffer, the identity and amount of added organic modier, were
studied. Organic solvents showed a considerable effect on separations in these experiments. The purpose of adding organic solvent
to background buffer is to adjust the polarity of the buffer in order
to affect the partition coefcient and selectivity of micelles as well
as to exert EOF inhibition. After the stacking process, the analytes
were well concentrated but migrated together in the absence of an
organic modier (Fig. 4). Various organic solvents, such as MeOH,
ACN and THF, were added to the background buffer to improve resolution. Improved resolution and sensitivity were obtained when
MeOH was added as the buffer modier. Moreover, various concentrations of MeOH (040%, v/v) were tested in phosphate buffer
(30 mM, pH 2.5, containing 100 mM SDS). As shown in Fig. 4, the resolution improved progressively with increasing amounts of MeOH.
When methanol concentration was greater than 40%, baseline separation could be achieved. Taken together, the optimum separation
conditions for our experiments were dened as 30 mM phosphate
buffer (pH 2.5) containing 40% MeOH and 100 mM SDS.
3.3. Method validation and sensitivity enhancement
To evaluate the quantitative applicability of this method, validation was conducted. Calibration curves were generated by
230
0.14
(A) 0%
0.12
(B) 30%
1+2+3
0.10
1+2+3
Abs.
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
-0.02
0.14
0.12
10
(C) 35%
12
14
10
12
(D) 40%
14
0.10
Abs.
0.08
0.06
0.04
1
3
0.02
0.00
-0.02
0
10
12
14
Time (min)
10
12
14
Time (min)
Fig. 4. Electropherograms with methanol at various concentrations in the background buffer. See Fig. 3 for other CE conditions.
Table 1
Regression equations, coefcient of determination, LODs and EF of the method.
Analytes
Regression equation
LODb (ng/mL)
EFc (folds)
THC
THC-OH
THC-COOH
0.993
0.995
0.994
10
5
0.5
100
120
2000
a
b
c
Coefcient of determination of inter-batch analysis were calculated from the assay values of prepared standards on ve different days (n = 5).
LOD, limits of detection were calculated from S/N = 3.
EF, enhancement factor were calculated as dividing the LODs obtained from normal MEKC by the LODs obtained from LVSI-ASEI-sweeping.
Table 2
Precision and accuracy for the determination of analytes.
RSD (%)
REa (%)
3.28
5.51
1.66
8.30
0.94
2.43
2.0 102
1.5 103
4.0 103
9.74
9.60
10.58
3.10
5.05
2.20
1.0 101
7.5 101
2.0 102
3.48
11.06
7.15
6.70
0.32
1.80
2.0 102
1.5 103
4.0 103
5.91
5.07
5.66
9.24
0.48
1.59
THC-OH
2.0 102
1.5 103
4.0 103
7.64
8.76
8.99
3.43
1.32
0.23
THC-COOH
1.0 101
7.5 101
2.0 102
7.51
8.61
4.80
1.19
1.41
2.95
2.0 102
1.5 103
4.0 103
THC-OH
THC-COOH
Intra-day (n = 3)
THC
Inter-day (n = 5)
THC
0.008
0.006
Abs.
0.004
0.002
3
0.000
-0.002
231
4. Conclusions
10
11
12
13
Time (min)
Fig. 5. Electropherograms of urine sample after extraction. (A) Blank urine (dotted
line), (B) blank urine spiked with analytes (THC, THC-OH 250 ng/mL; THC-COOH
125 ng/mL). The CE conditions are the same as those in Fig. 3.
232
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]