National Law University, Orissa

5th Semester B.A.LL.B./B.B.A.LL.B. 2014

IPR (Project Topics)
1. Each project topic is assigned to two students (except few) to work in a group.
2. Each group is expected to carefully go through some basic research material in the area (like standard text book, some
cases and other related material); and to meet the course teacher subsequently for guidance.
3. It is not advised to meet the course teacher without having preparatory reading or some initial research.
4. Projects may be typed on computer or may be handwritten on A-4 size paper with 1.5 margin in the left side and 1
margin on the right, with suitable margin at the top and bottom. Page nos. should be indicated at the centre top of the
page. The font size of the words should be 12 and there should be 1.5 spacing between the lines.( For detail please see
NLUO Examination Rules 2010)
5. The projects need not necessarily be spirally bound, but should be firmly stitched or pinned.
6. The projects should be between 4000-5000 words excluding Research Question, Scope, Objective, Research
Methodology, foot notes, abbreviation page, table of contents, table of cases and bibliography.
7. Bibliography should only be of those books that are made use of in writing the project. Table of cases should contain only
those cases actually read by the students (either wholly or partially) for the project.
8. All the groups will submit the soft copy of the project to the course teacher. Only thirty per cent turnitin text (excluding
foot notes) match will be allowed. If text match will be more than thirty percent then project will be rejected without
giving an opportunity to resubmit. Any text match should not be more than six per cent (Except quotation) at a place
within thirty per cent limit. No student will check his/her project on turnitin otherwise it will reflect hundred per cent
text match at the time of final checking which will result into rejection of project.
9. Any kind of change in project topic without written permission of the course teacher will lead to rejection of the
project.
10. Project Consultation:
Project Consultation is optional. There will not be any marks for consultation.

PROJECT TOPICS
Sl
No.

B.A. L.L.B.
1. PRIABRAT SINGH - 35

ABHAY PRATAP S. TOMAR -03

2. SANSKRITI TIWARI - 44

Project Topics

B. B.A. L.L.B.

Natural Law Justification of IPR in KARTIKEY GUPTA

the light of Pharmaceutical Industry
AKANSHA DIXT
Lockean Labour Philosophy
Doctrine of Creativity

Vs RANJEEV KHATANA 39
PRAGALBH BHARDWAJ 34

Project Topics
'Up In The Aereo: The Aereo
Fiasco And Its Impact In India And
Cloud Computing
Plant Patenting in USA and its
Global Implications

ROHAN GOSWAMI 42
3. ANIL KUMAR- 12.

ABHAY SHARMA- 26.

4. AMAN KUMAR DEVANDA 8

LALIT MEENA27

5. ASTITVA PRATAP SINGH 18

SHUBHAM SAIGAL 47
6. MANISHA RAWAT 29

DWARKANATH 22.
7. ABHISHEK TOPPO 5

NIKHIL SAINI 41
8. SHASHWAT 45

RAMESH 40
9. ISHIKA GOON 25

AMIT BHATTACHARYYA 9
10.AAKASH SINGH,

SUDEER AND CHENNA REDDY

Issue and Challenges of IPR in MAYANK MISHRA 27

African Continent
DIVYAM KRISHNA 19

Critical Analysis of Article 27 of

TRIPS Agreements

Relevancy of Paris Convention in ANKITA MISHRA 10 DISHA Critical Analysis of Working of

Modern International IP Regime
KAPOOR 17
TRIPS Agreements

Relevancy of Berne Convention in AMAN PANDEY 9

Modern International IP Regime
SHUBHRAJYOTI JENA 51
Protected Person Under TRIPS
SOURAV MISHRA 53
Agreement
AVADHUTA VAMSHI
KRISHNA 13
Doctrine of Exhaustion vis a vis
GOUTAM PANIGRAHI 22
Parallel Import
SUNEET KU. PADHI 55
Compulsory Licensing under
SHAKTI SEKHAR 46
Copyright and Music Industries
MAYANK TRIPATHY 28
Protection of Non creative Data-Base:
A Global Perspective
Global Trend of Protectable Subject
Matter in Trademark: Issues and

PRAKHAR GHADGE
RITESH KUMAR SHARMA
MAYANK MISHRA

Bio-prospecting in New World

Order
Most Favoured Nation Treatment
Under TRIPS and Its Implications
Critical Analysis of doctrine of
exhaustion in Indian IP regime
Analysis of Judicial Approach in
Developing and Shaping New IP
jurisprudence in Last Ten Years
Cable casting and Infringement of
copyright
Copyright In Education
Institution: A Comparative Study

11.NISHANTH S KADUR 33

ARKA SAHA 15
12.MANDAR BHATODKAR 028

PRISCILLA LALNUNPUII 36
13.PUJITHA BHASKAR 38

14.12BBA005--ADITYA PRASAD RATH

12BBA026--DEBASIS SHAOO

15.TANMAY AGRAWAL 56

SAURABH SOTWAL 45
16.AADHYA 1

59

17.SOURJYA DAS 52

UDATTA GANGULY 56

18.ABHIGYA JHA (2012/BA/004) AND

SIMRAN SAHNI 49
19.PAVANI NAGARAJA BHAT, 34,

ANDRI SHUKLA, 11,

20.SOHAM ROY51

DURVA SHRIVASTHAVA 20
21.ANMOL AWASTHI 14

NEELASHA NEMANI,

Titiksha Shrivastava 57
Rashmi Shukla 47

Social Perspective of protecting

Copyright

AVILASH KUMBHAR 15
GAURAV RAJ 21

Analysis of Diagnostic Method as non SAMRIDDHI VERMA 43

patentable subject matter
SANSKRITI BHARDWAJ 44

AMRITA LALL 10

VISHALAKSHI TIWARI

Challenges
Constitutional Perspective of
protecting IPRs

An analysis if the infringement of

trademark by comparative
advertising
Right of Information in
International IP Regime
"Distinctiveness And
Descriptiveness As A Feature Of
Trademark And Its Implications"
Impact of neighbouring rights on
entertainment in India"

Analysis of essential biological

process as non patentable subject
matter

(HIMANSHU R. PALIWAL
23
AKHILESH CHANDAK 8

A Critical Analysis of protection of

plant verities: A Global Perspective
Protection of Pantomimes and
Choreographic Works

STEVE SALDANHA 54
RISHI RAJ 040
SHIVANK JHANJI 49
MOHAMMED SHADAB30

Analysis of non biological and micro

biological process as patentable
subject matter

KUMAR SHUBHAM 3
VAISHALI SINGH 59

Public Policy and patentability of

Invention
Exceptions to Patentees Right: A
Comparative Study US, EU and India

ABHAY JAIN2
AKHIL NENE 7
AVI DHIRENDRA 14
SABAH KHAN 42

Copyright collecting societies

Concept of Originality in
Topographies of Integrated Circuits

ESHNA SAXENA 20
NAMRATA SRIVASTAVA32

'Reverse payments': analysis of a

trend contributing to the evergreening

NAMRATA BEHERA 31
AASTHA TRIVEDI 1

Analysis of Development of IP
Sentiments in India and Its Effect
on Economy
Biotechnologicalpatent: law nad
limitations

Software patent vs free software

Copyright in entertainment
industries (mainly film and music
industry)
Copyright: Economic Right vs
human right

Protection of confidential
information in india

22. ANKITA GOSWAMI 13

of patents in pharmaceutical industry

Patenting agricultural biotechnology:
an obstacle to food security in india

SANSKRITI BHARDWAJ 44
SAMRIDDHI VERMA 43

Comparative study of protection of

public funded intellectual property

Conceptual issues in patenting of life

forms

MINAL SANGATWANI 29
PRIYANKA MURALI 35

Patenting of Synthetic
Microorganism

DISHA MOHANTY1
23.GANESH PRASAD G. - 023

AISHWARYA MOHANTY 24.NAINA CHOUDHURY30

VAISHALI BADERIYA 57
25.DUSHYANT KUMAR- 21

VEER VIKRAM SINGH-58

26.ASHISH SHUKLA 16

Challenges of breeder's rights in sugeneris protection of plant verities

A Comparative Study of IP
Administrative Procedures of USA,
EU, China and India
Biopatent vs bioethics

VIVEK RANJAN 60
27. SAKSHI SHARMA 43

SMRITI SINGH 50

Stem cell patenting: a comparative

study of UD, EU and Indian law

Note- 1. In case of getting complaint about non working or non cooperating of any partner by other partner, a fresh topic may be
allotted to non working or non cooperating partner last up to last three day before final submission date without giving any
relaxation for submission.
2. Any kind of group formation for project allotment will not be accepted now.