Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Research Guide
DR. RAJINDER. S. AURORA
M.Com, MFM, PhD, DHE, UGC-NET
June 2010
1
Submitted by
MRS. SUMATHI GOPAL
Enrolment NO: DYP-PHD-066100015.
Research Guide
DR. RAJINDER. S. AURORA
M.Com, MFM, Ph.D, DHE, UGC-NET
June 2010
DECLARATION
CERTIFICATE
at the
Place:
Date:
Signature of the
Head of the department
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
In the first place, I am indebted to the Padmashree Dr. D.Y. Patil
University Department of Business Management, which has accepted
me for their Doctorate program and provided me with an excellent
opportunity to carry out the present research work. I express my sincere
thanks to DR. RAJINDER.S.AURORA, my research guide for providing
valuable inputs, guidance from time to time and taking his precious time
in going through synopsis and the draft proposal meticulously and
helping in doing the research project.
I wish to take opportunity to express my sincere gratitude to director
DR.R.GOPAL for his valuable guidance and support in this endeavour.
Dr RAJINDER. S. AURORA and Dr. R. GOPAL have been a constant
source of inspiration throughout in my completion of the research. I
would also like to thank my family for supporting me in this noble
endeavour and help me to complete this research. Last but not the least
I thank all the respondents, the officials of Banks, and Financial
Institutions, the subject experts and other authorities, and friends who
have helped me directly or indirectly in completing my research project,
without the support of all my well wishers this project would not become
a reality.
Place:
Date:
CONTENTS
Chapter No.
1.
TITLE
Introduction to NPAs
1.1
3.
4.
1-11
1-2
1.2
Classification of NPAs
2-5
1.3
1.4
1.5
2.
Theme
Page No.
and NBFI
6-9
9-10
1.6
10-11
1.7
Conclusion
11
12-43
2.1
Introduction
12
2.2
Review of Literature
13-35
2.3
35-40
2.4
40-43
2.5
Conclusion
43
44-49
3.1
44
3.2
44
3.3
Objectives
45
3.4
Limitations
46
3.5
Methodology
46-48
3.6
Conclusion
48-49
50-65
4.1
Introduction
50-51
4.2
51-52
5.
4.3
52-61
4.4
61-62
4.5
4.6
Conclusion
66-96
5.1 Introduction
66
5.2 Classification
66-69
69-80
5.4
80-84
84-86
5.6
86-96
5.7 Conclusions
6.
64-65
96
97-248
6.1 Introduction
97-99
99-134
134-165
165-183
184-192
Conclusion
192-247
247-248
249-263
7.1 Introduction
249-251
251-253
257-262
7.5 Conclusion
262-262
8.
264-272
8.1 Introduction
264-266
266-268
269-271
8.4 Conclusions
9.
271-272
273-276
Appendix
I-XVI
Annexure
XVII-XXVIII
Abbreviation
XXIX-XXXII
Bibliography
XXXIII-XLIV
Chapter No
List of Tables
Page No.
5.1
5.2
5.3
73
5.4
75
5.5
5.6
78
5.7
70
82
85
5.8
5.9
92
5.10
94
5.11
7.1
95
252
7.2
254
7.3
258
10
Executive Summary
A strong banking sector is important for flourishing economy. The
failure of the banking sector may have an adverse impact on other
sectors. Non-performing assets are one of the major concerns for banks
in India. NPAs reflect the performance of banks. A high level of NPAs
suggests high probability of a large number of credit defaults that affect
the profitability and net-worth of banks and also erodes the value of the
asset. The NPA growth involves the necessity of provisions, which
reduces the overall profits and shareholders value.
The problem of NPAs is not only affecting the banks but also the whole
economy. In fact level of NPAs in Indian banks is nothing but a
reflection of the state of health of the industry and trade. However
lending also carries a risk called credit risk, which arises from the failure
of borrower. Non-recovery of loans along with interest forms a major
hurdle in the process of credit cycle. Though complete elimination of
such losses is not possible, but banks can always aim to keep the
losses at a low level.
Study includes Public Sector Banks, Private Sector Banks, Scheduled
Urban Co-operative Banks and Non Banking Financial Institutions and
includes the views of borrowers, facilitators who are directly or
indirectly
connected
with
the
banks
and
financial
institutions.
Comparative analysis has been carried out between the banks and
analysis is carried out on issues like priority sectors, agricultural
lending, weaker sections, other Priority, Gross and Net Profit and Loss.
11
12
Many banks in East Asian countries had to close down due to high level
of NPA. The future picture of Commercial banks more so the banks &
financial institution seem to be brighter. Study suggests that the NPAs
of banks & FI will decline marginally both in terms of Gross and Net
figures over next three years. This may be due to higher provisions,
which the banks have been providing. The real issues are percentage of
NPA declining over the years but the absolute figures seem to be
increasing. A strong banking sector is important for a flourishing
economy. The failure of the banking sector may have an adverse impact
on other sectors. Credit to priority sectors have higher NPAs, due to
increase in outstanding amount in priority sector the banks face
problems in further disbursement and increase their existing profits.
Hence managers of rural and semi-urban branches generally sanction
these loans. In the changed context of new prudential norms and
emphasis on quality lending and profitability, managers should make it
amply clear to potential borrowers that banks resources are scarce and
these are meant to finance viable ventures so that these are repaid on
time and relevant to other needy borrowers for improving the economic
lot of maximum number of households. Hence, selection of right
borrowers, viable economic activity, adequate finance and timely
disbursement, correct end use of funds and timely recovery of loans is
absolutely necessary pre-conditions for preventing or minimizing the
incidence of new NPAs.
13
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION TO NPAS
1.1 Theme
A strong banking sector is important for flourishing economy.
The failure of the banking sector may have an adverse impact on other
sectors. Non-performing assets are one of the major concerns for banks
in India. NPAs reflect the performance of banks. A high level of NPAs
suggests high probability of a large number of credit defaults that affect
the profitability and net-worth of banks and also erodes the value of the
asset. The NPA growth involves the necessity of provisions, which
reduces the overall profits and shareholders value.
The issue of Non Performing Assets has been discussed at length
for financial system all over the world. The problem of NPAs is not only
affecting the banks but also the whole economy. In fact level of NPAs in
Indian banks is nothing but a reflection of the state of health of the
industry and trade. Granting of credit for economic activities is the
prime duty of banking. Apart from raising resources through fresh
deposits, borrowings and recycling of funds received back from
borrowers constitute a major part of funding credit dispensation activity.
Lending is generally encouraged because it has the effect of funds
being transferred from the system to productive purposes, which results
into economic growth. However lending also carries a risk called credit
risk, which arises from the failure of borrower. Non-recovery of loans
along with interest forms a major hurdle in the process of credit cycle.
14
Substandard Assets
I.e. those which are NPA for a period not exceeding two years (Up to 2
years).
ii.
Doubtful Assets
I.e. Loans which have remained NPA for a period exceeding two years
and which are not considered as loss assets. NPA accounts belonging
to this category are further classified as
D1 When the account remains NPA for 3rd year.
D2 When the account remains NPA for 4th and 5th year.
D3 When the account remains NPA for 6th year onwards.
iii.
Loss Assets
A loss asset is one where loss has been identified but the amount has
not been written off wholly or partly. In other words, such assets are
considered as uncollectible. As per RBI guidelines provisions for NPA
are to be made as under:a)
b)
c)
15
Legacy NPAs
ii.
New NPAs
i. Legacy NPAs
These are the NPAs acquired even before the prudential accounting
norms were introduced. Government has given the task of social
banking to the PSBs and issued guidelines and framed policies whereby
40% of the total advances must go to priority sector. Here only the
16
committee
report
assets
Directed
Credit
has
17
18
sector banks have higher NPA level than the private Sector banks.
Cooperative sector banks have more NPA than the private sector banks
due to priority lending and strict compliance of regulatory measures.
NBFC comparatively have less NPA they are more cautious at the time
of releasing loans and recovery process. Generally banks indulge in
creative accounting and loan rollovers ever greening to keep the level of
NPA low. The share of NPA is read as interest expenses is greater than
their earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
19
20
framing banking rules and regulations. Inspite of the strict banking laws
the cooperative banks are able to meet the required formalities. The
comparison is required to find out the scope of improvement in
scheduled Urban Cooperative banks so as to be as competitive as
Public Sector banks and Private sector banks Today schedule Urban
Cooperative banks are expected to support all sections of borrowers by
financing them to start a new business or for agricultural purpose the
banks accepts deposits from the members and lend money to needy
persons. Since their main objective is to support priority sector, farmer,
agriculturist, SSI, artisans, small traders and salary earners. Recovery
becomes difficult and leads to NPA. Generally cooperative banks do not
issue credit cards but they issue Kissan card which is may prove to be
doubtful debts.
Non Banking Finance Company is not a regular bank but they
raise the capital through public issues. Hence Reserve Bank of India is
very stringent in passing rules and regulations. The Non Banking
Financial Institution is more careful in lending loans. They prefer only
collateral security and also and along with collateral security they also
insist on Guarantors. The research study involves those Non Banking
Finance who provides general loans .Some Non Banking Finance lend
specific kind of loan which may not be appropriate to the research
study. The comparison enabled to bring about striking features of
success on recovery proceedings and quality of the assets with
reduction in NPA or not.
21
22
Creating a level playing field when global players enter the Indian
markets;
Hence it is necessary for the Indian financial market to bring about the
restructuring of the banking sector by comparing or merging banking
sector and non banking sector ensure the growth of the economy along
with the adequate availability of the credit to the fast growing sectors of
the economy.
23
1.7. Conclusions
The research thesis covers all the sectors of the banks and also
financial institutions. Since finance is very important for all the business
houses lending and recovery becomes a complex preposition. Recovery
strategy should be planned meticulously and executed properly. Failing
which may lead to NPA. The comparison of the entire sector will enable
the banks to know which sector contributes maximum NPA and the type
of lending that is the source of NPA.
24
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE AND GENISIS OF COMMITTEES
2.1 Introduction
RBI and Govt. of India had appointed various committees and Study
Groups from time to time to study in depth different aspects on Banks
Credit, , Legal Reform and Non-Performing Assets. All these subject
matters are co-related and interconnected to this research study and
hence it is necessary to know, in brief, about the purpose of
appointment of such Committees, their terms of reference and some of
the valuable recommendations made by them. Non- performing Assets
have been plaguing the Indian financial sector since long but were not in
the public domain till early nineties. By that time, significant amount of
loan assets involving uncertainly with respect to ultimate collection
piled up creating concerns with the opinion makers about health of
Indian banking and financial sector. NPAs reflect natural waste of any
economy. In advanced economies the financial markets are well
developed and segmented; with various players operating in identified
niches, catering to various users/risk segments. This constitutes an
effective institutional mechanism for targeting risks to players with
appetite for such risks. Commercial bank is conducted in a highly risk
managed and mitigated ambience, unlike their Indian counterparts who
are often required to take unmitigated risk as a part of business policy.
25
Sankarnarayanan3-(1992):
The
last
two
decades
have
26
applied
for
NPA
management.
The
research
study
27
B.Trivedi8-(2000):
brings
about
the
causes
and
factors
28
namely efficiency and profitability. The author suggested that week bank
should constantly monitored by Financial Restructuring Authority and
RBI. Such reform will enable to increase the profitability of Public Sector
Banks.
Mr.Kalkoti9-(2003)
.The
bank
faces
various
difficulties
in
good
29
The
study
evolves
modes
for
efficient
30
is
undergoing
transformation
since
the
beginning
of
31
SARFAESI Act and Basel II norms implies new challenges for Indian
banks as well as regulators. Financial performance of Indian banking
industry has become more competitive and raised issues about
efficiency and regulatory effectiveness.
Dr.Sukhdev Singh16 (2006): The author had suggested the alternative
measures for improvement in the banking industry. The study evaluated
the performance of banks against benchmark and ratio analysis was
employed as the tools. The analysis of the NPA observed the decline in
post liberalisation period .The study insisted that the ideal level
benchmark is less than 1 percent, the segments curtail the growth rate
of NPAs and followed certain policy like counterparts who had not only
arrested the NPA but reduced them.
Arabi.U17 (2007) Keeping in view the alternative sources of finance and
its role in economic development in India, the study aims at evaluating
bank credit role and how it is channelled to the different sectors in India.
The author has made an attempt to understand the effective
performance of credit delivered to different development sectors. The
paper also deliberated the analysis on the bank credit to the various
sectors
like
agriculture,
SSI,
micro
finance,
housing
finance,
32
only understand the various types of emerging risks but also the ways
and means to measure and mitigate them. The paper discussed the
important concepts in task management as applicable to banks against
the backdrop of Basel II. The paper thus aimed to develop a basic
understanding on major risks surrounding a banking institution as also
the more popular means of measuring them.
Dr Milind19 (2007): The objective of the paper is to measure the
productive efficiency of banks in developing country. The measurement
of efficiency in this paper is done using Data Envelopment Analysis. The
study shows the mean efficiency score of Indian banks compares well
with the world mean efficiency score and the efficiency of private sector
commercial banks as a group is, paradoxically lower than that of public
sector banks and foreign banks in India and brings an insight to the
existing policy of reducing non-performing assets
S.R.Shinde20 (1999) the importance of Return on Equity (ROE) as an
instrument to judge the financial performance of the bank. The author
has analyzed the component which determines Profit Margin (PM), Asset
Utilization (AU) and Equity Multiplier (EM). The study dealt with the
strategies which may be adopted by the bank management to improve
the PM and the AU which may be ultimately results into higher ROE. The
highlight of the study dealt by the author is major components of
banking risk. The author looked at various tools of financial analysis as
a yard stick to judge the performance of a bank and its management.
P.R.Kulkarni21 (1999) the small scale sector has been assigned an
important role in national economy. Competitiveness of the products of
33
34
35
27
36
37
38
the major event of dilution risk loss situations. Dilution of risk is the new
term in credit risk family. The study suggested that book-debt or
receivable financing should not be allowed and similarly no advance to
be allowed against the book-debt.
Abhinna Mohan Nanda35 (2006) Fraudster availed finance by creating
mortgages on fictitious title deed to the property or properties and also
mortgage fake title deeds to the non-existent property since no
registration of mortgage is done in banks favour in the office of Subregistrar. The author suggested in his articles a harmonious blend of
equitable and registered mortgage with a very nominal additional cost
with all attendant benefits of both. Banks charge under the suggested
method will be reflected in the Encumbrance Certificate serving as due
notice to the public at large and other banks/ financial institution which
will help in preventing fraud and supplementary recitals to be recorded
at the branch of the bank.
S.Khasnobis36 (2006) A large part of the banking sector growth, has
been on the back of financing consumptions, as reflected in the growth
of retail banking. Growth driver would involve financing the emerging
Small and Medium Enterprise sector of the economy. The evaluation of
the NPA has been blended by the author by the asset companies which
specialise in certain segment of the financial sector. The author
highlighted pre-liberalization and post liberalization effect through these
articles.
S.K.Bagchi37 (2006) Capital Stock in any business organisation is the
buffer against the vicissitudes of risks facing in the market driven
39
overdue of the loan of the banking system both credit cooperative credit
societies and of commercial banks, but also other regulating agencies
like RBI,NABARD and other policy makers at national level. It also gave
a solution that high overdue payment leads to the bank in inconvenient
position at the time of availing refinance facilities from the external
sources. The author in his research has preferred drought prone areas
since the trend recovery of loan has been worsening. The demand for
the recovery was higher than actual recovery.
40
Sankar Thappa40 (2007) has dealt with the Securitization process at the
time of lending and borrowing money from the banks and financial
institution. Globalization has resulted into rapid transformation of the
financial system all over the world. As a result capital market, money
market and debt market are getting widened and deepened. The study
has involved the process of securitization and five stages involved in
securitization of the assets. The author has also revealed the future for
securitization in India.
John Ferry41 December 2008 projected the most recent phase of the
financial crisis in reference to Basel lI, Pillar II that covers three aspects
for controlling risk viz. responsibility for the board and senior
management stressed the importance of internal control over external
suprvision and sets target for banks capital to match the risk profile of
the banks. Author highlighted liquidity risk management public
disclosure and the role of supervisors.
V.S.Kaveri42 (2008) The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
published a paper on Compliance Functions in Banks in April 2005,
which discussed certain principles of compliance. The RBI reviewed the
working of compliance system in banks, which was found to be not
effective. Subsequently, the RBI set up a working group to make
suitable recommendations to strengthen the compliance system. These
guidelines
cover
Compliance
Principles,
Process,
Procedures,
41
42
Basel
norms
and
the
various
challenges
and
impacts
of
43
of
Basel
II
norms,
Proper
implementation
of
risk
44
though there warning signal and underlines the fact that banks have
successfully waded through a tough liquidity scenario without
hampering the credit growth. The present study is based on the CAMEL
methodology which evaluates component that is prime importance from
the functioning of the banks perspective. The model examines the
efficiency of banks among parameter like Capital Adequacy, Asset
Quality, Management, Earnings Quality and liquidity.
Tarun Bhatia52 (2009) the global economic crisis had a significant impact
on the economies and financial systems of several countries. The paper
refer to the success of Indian performance is the accumulation of the
capital. Indias banks have maintained healthy capitalisation levels in
the past decade. The author observed that it is necessary and beneficial
for the banks to raise capital through hybrid instruments in order to
maintain a healthy Capital Adequacy ratio. Banks healthy and improved
capitalization cushions the impact of higher NPAs.
R.Vaidyanathan53 (2009) as the economy grows it is necessary to recast
financial system to ensure the growth. The author has made a
comparison between PSB, Private Bank and NBFC. The study made has
been evaluated on the reduction of interest, enhancing credit delivery
mechanism, revising relationship. PSB have been geared to Asset
Based Lending rather than lending based on the forecast cash flows.
Thus the author concludes NBFC need to integrate domestic financial
markets through the system of making UIBs (unincorporated Bodies).
Jagadish. R. Raiyani54 (2010) SSI contributes substantially to the
production, exports and employment in India. The paper dealt with the
45
progress made by SSI and policy laid by the government exclusively for
the socioeconomic objectives. The author has brought in the analysis
the major problem faced by the SSI. Problems, such as scarcity of
power supply, human resources, availability of raw material, etc. are the
cause of obstruction for the growth of SSI. The study reveals one of the
solution to the growth is developing policy by the government with the
result the development can be achieved.
A.S. Ghatpande55 of Bank of Maharashtra had submitted dissertation on
the subject of Recovery of Bank loans an investigation into the
existing judicial process review of costs and time factors and
recommendations. Banks seek intervention of courts for recovery of
dues... The study discussed the theoretical aspects of seeking
intervention of court and analyzed the existing legal system. This is
followed by the application of the legal system for suits filed by banks
and to review the amounts blocked in civil suits. It further classifies the
cases to know the different facts in recovery of Banks dues. Detailed
analysis of the time spent at various stages of suit and general causes
for delay at each stage is explained.
V.K. Sudhakar56: Bank of Baroda had submitted dissertation on the
subject of Policies and Perspectives of NPA Reduction in Public Sector
Banks to The Indian Banks Association, Mumbai, 1997-98.This study
attempted to examine the issue relating to policies and practices
prevailing in the area of NPA reduction. This study also indicated that
though the top management of Public Sector Banks (PSBs) were
enlightened and concerned about the dimensions of NPAs in their bank,
46
the same is not shared by the staff at operational level. NPA reduction
as organizational goals not translated into action in true spirit. The
methods and system followed by most PSBs can at best be categories
as conventional and crude.
Ranjana Kumar57 (2004) speech delivered at the Business Session
Strategies for Managing Risk in Volatile Time, on April 4, 2003 on the
occasion of Banking Summit 2003 organised by the Confederation of
Indian Industries at Mumbai April 3rd to 5th 2003. The address of the
chairperson emphasised on the annual financial inspection and the
process is based on the CAMELS (applicable to all domestic banks)/
CALCS (applicable to Indian operations of banks incorporated outside
India) approach where Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management
Aspects, Earnings, Liquidity and Systems and Control are examined
keeping in view the requirement of Section 22 of the Banking Regulation
Act, 1949. (BRA). Author concluded that implementation of Risk Based
Supervision has been firmly laid by the regulators.
C.Rangarajan Governor58, RBI at the Bankers Training Centre of the
Nepal Rashtra Bank Katmandu on 18th May 1997 addressed in his
speech in respect of direct lending, there is a prescription that 40% of
the net bank credit should go to priority sector such as agriculture,
small scale industries, small business man and programmes for poverty
alleviation without affecting the viability and profitability of the bank.
Speaker emphasized on operational efficiency and allocation efficiency.
Operational efficiency relates to the transaction cost and allocation cost
47
the
New
Millennium
delivered
at
22nd
Bank
Economists
48
lenders and
it
is
essential
for
banks
to
ensure
meaningful
49
2.3
1.
The then Union Finance Minister Shri Y.B. Chavan, while meeting the
Chairman/ Custodians of the Public Sector Banks on 22nd July 1970
indicated that the committee might be constituted to review the special
credit schemes of banks, with particular reference to their employment
potential. The terms of reference were to identify the types of selfemployed persons who should be considered for special financing.To
evolve guidelines in respect of security, rate of interest, period of
repayments and other terms and conditions.
2.
industries both in the private and public sectors and indicate the broad
criteria for deviating from these norms.
3.
51
RBI appointed the Working Group to review the system of cash credit in
all its aspect under the Chairmanship of Mr. K.B. Chore, Additional Chief
Officer, Department of Banking Operations and Development, RBI. The
terms of reference were to review the operation of the cash credit
system in recent years particularly with reference to the gap between
sanctioned credit limits and the extent of their utilization, to suggest
modifications in the system with a view to making the system more
amenable to rational management of fund by commercial banks.
52
7.
RBI constituted on 22nd March, 1981, a Study Group called the Study
Group of Development of Resources by State and Central Co-operative
Banks under the Chairmanship of Dr. M.V. Hate, Executive Director, RBI
to make an in-depth study of the problem of surplus resources and
profitable investment of loanable internal resources faced by the State
Co-operative Banks and Central Co-operative Banks The terms of
reference were to define and identify surplus resources with the State
and Central Co-operative Banks and to identify the causes and examine
the effects of this growing problem in relation to interest rate structure
and the concessional refinance facilities available from the RBI.
8.
9.
At the meeting of the Finance Minister with the Chief Executive Officers
of the Public Sector Banks held on 6th March, 1980.The
terms of
54
12.
2.4
1.
of
operations,
accountability
and
profitability
of
the
RBI had constituted a 7 member Working Group on 15th Dec. 1997 under
the Chairmanship of Shri S.H. Khan, Chairman and Managing Director of
IDBI, keeping in view the need for evolving an efficient and competitive
financial system. The terms of reference were to review the Role,
Structure and Operations of DFIs and Commercial Banks in the
55
56
5.
Reform of the Indian banking sector is now under way following the
recommendations of the Committee on Financial System (CFS), which
reported in 1991. The second generation of reform could be
conveniently looked at in terms of 3 broad interrelated issues and
actions that need to be taken to strengthen the foundation of the
banking system and structural changes in the system suggested capital
adequacy, asset quality, prudential norms, systems and methods in
banks.
6.
The RBI had set up Working Group in the month of March 1998 to review
the functioning of Debt Recovery Tribunals under the Chairmanship of
Shri N.V. Deshpandey. The objectives of the panel were to look into
various issues and problems confronting the functioning of DRTs in
expeditious recovery of banks dues and to examine the existing
statutory provisions and suggest necessary amendments to the
Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 and
Rules framed there under with a view to improving efficacy of legal
machinery,
7.
57
charge of this project whereas, Shri A.S. Rao and R.M. Thakkar, both
Deputy General Managers, assisted this project. This study has been
carried out using the RBI inspection reports on Banks, information /
data obtained from public sector banks and 6 private sectors banks and
those collected from the files on borrowable accounts maintained in
banks for assessing comparative position on NPAs and their recoveries
in banks. The causes for sickness /weak performance and consequently
the account turning NPA in respect of Public sector banks and private
sector banks.
2.5. Conclusions
In this Chapter, attempt is made to learn in brief, purpose, terms of
reference and findings of various Committees, Study Groups, and
Research work relating to the task of Credit, Legal Reforms and NPAs
which is very useful in this present research study. All these tasks are
discussed in detail in following Chapters where ever applicable.
58
CHAPTER 3
SCOPE OF THE STUDY
3.1
Need for the research study after observation that generally the authors
take separately Public Sector Banks, Private Sector Banks and
Cooperative Bank. Indeed the researcher have noticed similarities and
dissimilarities in these banks and also would like to perform detailed
study on NBFC along with these sectors and compare their NPA level
and their success.NPA is not only in Indian scenario but it is also
existing in foreign countries. Inspite of legal frame work and regulatory
have been appointed still NPA exist. As the need of time to regain trust
in all the sectors of as well as the Financial Institution the detailed
comparative analysis on policies, Cause for NPA at different stage and
level of NPA on priority, Non priority and SSI has been selected. Many of
the researchers studied the related topic only on Commercial banks or
separately on Private Banks or exclusively on Co operative Banks. It is
necessary to do the comparative analysis on all the sectors to get a fair
view of these related issues.
3.2
The study relates with the credit advances and recovery of loans by
banks and financial institutions. Recovery of loan is very important in
the success of performance of individual banks as well as sectors as a
whole. Failure to recover leads to overdues by the borrower. The
research study has been carried out to find out the measure to reduce
the bad loans in different sectors and the techniques to control the level
59
60
3.4
The study suffers from the limitations which are inherent due to
economic value and not physical value. The study is based on primary
data which carries its own limitations. The analysis is based on data
published by banks submitted to RBI. The cooperative banks are spread
over widely it is not possible to cover majority of the cooperative banks.
Cooperative banks are further classified into State Cooperative Banks,
Schedule Cooperative Banks, District
cooperative banks and Bhatti petti. The data is related to last 10 years
only. The research study mainly is based on Scheduled Urban
Cooperative banks. The study concentrated only on non performing
assets and related issues. The study is a combination of explanatory
and empirical.
3.5
61
i.
ACT,
Basel
Accord,
Recommendations
and
Public Banks
SBI subsidiaries
Private Sector Banks
Scheduled
Urban
Co-operative
Banks
NBFC (Multi Finance Loan)
Facilitators (Bank Advocates, Bank
Chartered Accountant, Industrial
borrower,
individual
borrower
collection Agent)
Total No. of
Banks
20
07
22
53
Sample size
114
-
30
81
18
07
15
15
62
3.5.2.Data Collection
Data analysis was analysed to meet the objectives and were presented
in graphical manner to bring about comparison to meet the above
objectives. Tables of all the Responses were drawn for the data. Simple
Statistical and Graphical method is used to present the facts observed
by the study.
3.6. Conclusion
The distribution of NPAs in the system follows 80-20 rule whereby 20%
by number of borrowers are responsible for 80% of value of impaired
assets and conversely. The large impaired assets comprise industrial
assets having good restructuring potential Arcil experience shows in
value terms more than 60% of the impaired assets are amenable to be
restructured or sold as a going concern. The small assets however have
to be put through a recovery process, where the collateral based
financing system followed in the country offers a fair recovery potential.
The seed of success of managing the impaired asset in any economy
lies in the speed of recycling these assets and their realization into
63
empowered
system
and
structure,
support
from
the
64
Chapter 4
LEGAL FRAME WORK AND NOTIFICATION
4.1 Introduction
Globalization has resulted into the rapid transformation of the financial
system all over the world1. As a result capital market, money market and
debt market are getting widened deepened. The growth of financial
market has increased the need for innovative instruments for raising
funds. There is increasing from investors, for high quality, low risk
securities. Today the toughest problem faced by the entire banking
industry in India is the NPAs, i.e. the loans, where the principal and
interest cannot be recovered, thus the assets stop earning any income.
The unbearable level of NPAs has led to lower interest income and loan
loss provisioning requirements which have destroyed the profitability of
the banks to great extent. Besides the recycling of funds is restricted,
thus leading to serious asset liability mismatches. The supply of credit
to potential borrowers have been blocked which is having a harmful
effect on the capital formation and hampering the economic activity of
the country. So the NPA problem is an issue of public debate and of
national priority.2
Indias legal system has traditionally been friendly towards borrowers
and famously slow and inefficient. In 1993, Debt Recovery Tribunal
(DRTs) was set up precisely to avert the said problem, to give bank
faster access to justice. In 2002, a major step in empowering banks in
65
their loan recovery effort came in the form of the NPA Ordinance, later
turned into the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets
and Enforcement of security Interest (SARFAESI) Act. The Act paves the
way for the establishment of Assets Reconstruction Companies (ARCs)
that can take the NPAs off the balance sheets of banks and recover
them.
66
loans,
consumer durable
farm
equipment
loans, personal
loans,
three-wheeler
loans,
and
or sale for
67
d. Send notice to a third person who has acquired the assets from
the borrower without the consent of the bank
2. In case NPA account is a consortium account or under multiple
finance the right to enforce securities can be exercised by the
banks/Financial institutions, only when secured creditors representing
not less than three fourth in value on the amount outstanding are
agreeable as laid down in sub-section 13(9).
3. After acquiring the possession of the assets charged to the bank and
selling the same and appropriation of scale proceeds towards the dues
of the bank, then the bank can approach DRT for recovering the balance
amount, if any, from the borrower/ guarantor as laid down in sub-section
13(10)
4. If the bank feels that there can be resistance for acquiring the assets
charged to the bank from the borrower, in such a case the bank can
approach the concerned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or the District
Magistrate by filing a written request for taking possession of the said
assets.(section 14)
5. After issuance of 60 days notice by the bank to the borrower, the
borrower shall not deal with the assets which are charged to the bank.
However, dealing in the said assets in the said assets in the ordinary
course of business of the borrower is permitted.
6. The provisions of the Act are not applicable to the following
transaction:
68
69
steps have been taken by the bank. But such an appeal shall not be
entertained by the DRT unless a specified amount of the outstanding
dues of the bank is deposited in the DRT. The right to appeal before
DRAT (Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal) within 30 days is given under
Section 18 to any person aggrieved by the order of DRT. The ousts the
jurisdiction of the Civil Courts and declares that no injunction shall be
granted in respect of any exercise of rights conferred by this ACT.
4.3. b. After the publication of this Act, several borrowers had filed writ
petitions in the Supreme Court of India, challenging the validity of the
Act. In the landmark case of Mardia Chemical Ltd. & Others vs. Union of
India & Others (2004) 120.Comp.Case 373 (SC), the Supreme Court has
upheld the validity of the Act. Some salient features of the judgement
are:
i. The Court directed that the banks should evolve appropriate
internal mechanism to thoroughly resolve the contentions raised
by the borrower. The bank should apply its mind to the objections
and communicate its reasons to the borrower. This shall be an
act of fairness on the part of the bank.
ii. The court held that banks and financial institution have been
have been provided with guidelines by the RBI laying down the
terms, conditions and circumstances in which the debt is to be
classified as non-performing assets. Hence, there is no arbitrary
illusory. It is also unreasonable and violation of Article 14 of the
constitution.
70
iii. Section 34 of the Act lays down that Civil Courts have no
jurisdiction to entertain any suit in respect of any matter which
DRT or DRAT (Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal) is empowered
to deal with. The court has upheld the validity of these
provisions.
iv. Accordingly, the Supreme Court upheld the whole of the Act
excluding Section 17 (2).5
4.3. c. The SARFAESI Act and the action of creditors have been
challenged in the courts almost immediately. In a decision in Mardia
Chemicals Vs ICICI case, the Supreme Court upheld the Act in 2004,
tilting the balance for the banks. Meanwhile the RBI has been
encouraging the banks to use the provisions of the SARFAESI Act. Ever
since the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and
Enforcement of Security Interests (SARFAESI) Act came into play, banks
and financial institutions have had a mixed experience. The initial
brouhaha over this devise to plug the burgeoning non-performing
assets (NPAs) in the country was stonewalled by Mardia Chemicals,
whose legal acumen persuaded the Supreme Court to pass a temporary
order permitting banks to take over the assets hypothecated but not
dispose them. This halfway house still continues. A decision was
expected on September 15, but Mardia Chemicals is proving to be very
tenacious litigant.6
The intent of the Act is to provide a remedy to the secured creditors to
minimise their NPAs. It is nobody's case that any bank or financial
71
72
73
need for further measures for the quick recovery of NPAs, and to
empower Banks and Financial Institutions to recover the NPAs without
intervention of judicial process. In that process guidance was found
from Section 69A of Transfer of Property Act and State Finance
Corporation Acts, where there is provision for the sale of secured assets
without the intervention of Courts. In that process Securitisation and
Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest
Act 2002 (SARFAESI) was enacted. The SARFAESI Ordinance 2002 was
promulgated on the 21st June 2002 to regulate securitization and
reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest
and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. The
provisions of the Ordinance would enable banks and financial
institutions to realize long-term assets, manage problem of liquidity,
asset liability Articles mismatches and improve recovery by exercising
powers to take possession of securities, sell them and reduce nonperforming
assets
by
adopting
measures
for
recovery
or
74
SARFAESI Act for the recovery of NPAs effective in letter and spirit.
SARFAESI Act is simply a procedural enactment like CPC and it seldom
deals with substantive rights on the properties. In effect SARFAESI Act,
explicitly or by implication overrides all other earlier procedural laws for
the recovery of NPAs. To be more specific Banks and Financial
Institutions
In Transcore case the Supreme Court has held in: In our view, Section
17(4) shows that the secured creditor is free to take recourse to any of
the measures under Section 13(4) notwithstanding anything contained
in any other law for the time being in force, When the Supreme Court
compared State Revenue law with the SARFAESI Act it sent wrong
signals as if the SARFAESI Act overrides even the substantive laws.
3.3.d. Secondly they drew an analogy with the provisions of CPC and
held that the Rules framed under the ITCP Rules largely correspond to
the relevant Rules occurring under Order 21 of the Code of Civil
Procedure relating to the execution of a decree. They held that Rule 39
of the ITCP Rules corresponds to Order 21 Rule 95 C.P.C. which deals
with delivery of possession in occupancy of judgment debtor and Rule
75
76
77
78
4.6. Conclusion
1. The Act is term as comprehensive and extraordinary piece of
legislation8. The only way to put a stop to NPA problem is to attack the
problems which are in built in the system like lack of infrastructure,
liberal terms of financing, holding the managers personally responsible
for any laziness and negligence on their part.
2. As Justice B.P.Banerjee puts in: The Act does not provide a magic
wand to remove the sickness in the industry, it can, at the best, be
looked upon a transient phase in the culture of financing9.
3. The Act gives sweeping powers to banks and FIs to seize the assets
charged to them and realize their loans without any intervention of the
Court. It is a tool and not a weapon in the hands of the banks to shoot
the defaulters10. Taking over the defaulters personal assets where the
wilful defaulters has siphoned out the assets under the banks charge
needs to be taken in the long run if the Act fails to deliver the required
result. Since the NPA is an integral part of the operational risk the
government provided a legal frame work through which banks can
transfer the NPAs to a separate entity called Special purpose Vehicles
(SPV) which is private owned Asset Management Companies (AMC).
4. The major originators/issuers of securitisation transactions have been
more private Banks, NBFC and Housing Finance Companies (HFCs).
Major investors in securitisation transaction have been public and
private sector banks, mutual funds and insurance companies. The
single loan CLO transaction involved a bank giving a loan to a corporate
the receivables were then securitized immediately using a Private Trust
79
80
CHAPTER 5
ANALYSIS OF POST LIBERALIZATION DEVELOPMENT IN BANKS
5.1. Introduction:
Indias commercial banking system consists of non scheduled banks
and scheduled banks. Scheduled banks consist of scheduled
commercial banks and scheduled co-operative banks. The former are
further divided into four categories:
i. Public Sector Banks (which are classified into Nationalised
Banks and State Bank of India (SBI) and its subsidiaries)
ii. Private Sector Banks (which are classified as old Private Sector
Bank and New Private Sector Banks that emerged after 1991.
iii. Foreign Banks in India
iv. Regional Rural Banks (which operate exclusively in rural areas to
provide credit and other facilities to rural areas). The SBI
group of banks consists of eight independently capitalised
banks-seven associate banks and SBI itself.
v. Scheduled Cooperative Banks are further divided into Scheduled
Urban Cooperative Banks and Scheduled State Cooperative
Banks.
81
82
83
Table 5.1
Advances Granted by the PSBs to Small Scale Industries
Total SSI Advances
March Ending
(Rs.Crores)
Percentage
1999
42674
17.3
2000
45788
15.6
2001
47909
5.32
2002
49742
3.91
2003
52988
11.1
2004
58278
10.4
2005
67634
9.4
2006
82434
8.1
2007
102550
7.8
2008
148651
10.9
Net NPAs
% to Advances
% to Advance
1998-1999
15.89
08.13
1999-2000
14.02
07.42
2000-2001
12.40
06.74
2001-2002
11.09
05.82
2002-2003
09.36
04.54
2003-2004
07.79
02.98
2004-2005
05.53
02.00
2005-2006
03.64
01.32
2006-2007
02.66
01.05
2007-2008
02.23
00.99
Year
86
87
Committee-I (1991) for its reduction from 40% to 10% while narrowing
the focus of priority sector on small farmers and other low income
groups rest crucially on nonperforming advances. This situation gave
raise NPA. Table 5.3 shows that gross NPA under priority sector is
increasing since 1999 to 2008. In 1999 the gross NPA under priority
sector is 43.70% and in 2008 gross NPA is 63.62%. The share of nonpriority sector shows the reduction in gross NPA. In 1999 the gross
NPA under non-priority is 53.40% and in 2008 it has reduced to 35.63%.
Similarly the share of NPAs in public sector shows reduction of gross
NPA, from 2.90 in 1999 to 0.75 in 2008.From Table 5.3 it clearly shows
the level of NPA in public sector bank is the least and the maximum
contribution of NPA emerges from the priority sector.
Table 5.3
Sector Wise Non Performing Advances of Public Sector Banks Public
Sector Banks
Sector wise NPAs (% to Gross NPAs)
Year Ending
March
1999
Priority
Sector
43.70
Non-Priority
Sector
53.4
Public Sector
2.90
Gross NPAs
(Rs.Crore)
51710
2000
44.50
53.5
2.00
53294
2001
45.43
51.35
3.22
53174.12
2002
44.49
53.54
2.00
56506.34
2003
47.20
50.70
2.10
52807
2004
47.74
51.14
1.12
34989.7
2005
49.05
50.00
0.94
47696.48
2006
54.07
45.11
0.82
41378.23
2007
59.46
39.27
1.27
38601.8
2008
63.62
35.63
0.75
39748.51
88
89
Table 5.4
Bank Group wise and Sector wise NPAs (percent of NPAs to Gross NPAs)
Year
Ending
March
Non-
Priority
Public
Priority
Sector
Sector
Sector
SBI
PSB
SBI
PSB
SBI
PSB
1999
44.6
43.7
51.9
53.4
3.5
2.9
2000
45.2
44.5
51.9
51.5
2.8
2.0
2001
44.2
45.4
49.8
51.4
6.0
3.2
2002
45.7
44.5
51.2
53.5
3.1
2.0
2003
47.5
47.2
49.4
50.7
3.1
2.1
2004
47.07
47.54
51.48
51.24
1.45
1.22
2005
47.39
49.05
51.48
50.0
1.13
49.05
2006
54.95
54.07
44.10
45.11
0.95
0.82
2007
57.15
59.46
41.6
39.27
1.50
1.27
2008
58.49
63.62
40.88
35.63
0.63
0.75
90
with its NBC value. The ratio in a particular sector is almost identical
since the regulatory body monitors and passes the rules and regulations
on a Uniform basis.
b. Agricultural Lending
Agricultural lending should not exceed one-fourth of the agricultural
sub-target of 18%, i.e.4.5% of NBC for the purpose of computing the
achievements of banks under the 18% targets. As per the available data
OBC had the least NPA during the research period between 1999 to
2008.The level of NPA was 6.61 in 2006.The level of NPA in three banks
During the research period exceeded 30% of agricultural advances.
Bank of India, Indian Overseas Bank and PNB are the three banks which
had the high level of NPA. Out of these three banks Bank of India had
32.01% of NPA in 2008. (As shown In the Appendix 1).The cause of
concern in those banks where NPA in agricultural credit to gross NPA
exceeded 20%.These banks have to take special initiative for reducing
their NPAs proportion in agricultural lending at least to the average
level of PSBs. It is stipulated that 40% of the priority sector credit should
go to agricultural lending (18% of NBC), keeping 40% in view, the
distribution of PSBs according to the percentage share of NPAs in
agricultural advances to NPAs in priority sector credit is calculated. It is
noted that banks wherein NPAs in agricultural credit is contributing
maximum NPA, the reason need to be identified and urgent remedial
measures should be initiated at all level. In case of high or low NPA it
appears to be not a good proposition. In fact to that extent it affects the
profitability of the bank because the net NPA is adjusted from the
91
reserve set aside by the bank and it reduces the profits of the banks
such. With the result it has an impact on the performance of the bank.
Bank
No
Group
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Lowest
5.6
8.0
5.5
2.4
10.1
8.5
14.4
14.1
12.4
16.1
Average
10.2
11.2
10.4
11.1
11.9
15.5
19.7
25.4
27.4
26.6
Highest
16.0
17.8
12.0
22.1
19.2
22.9
26.0
31.3
31.3
33.9
Lowest
5.6
6.9
5.5
2.4
8.2
9.9
7.1
15.4
15.7
17.1
Average
10.9
11.8
12.1
11.9
11.9
15.5
17.4
22.4
27.5
28.2
Highest
17.7
22.0
22.3
22.2
22.2
29.3
33.3
32.6
36.6
39.9
State
A
Bank
Group
Public
B
Sector
Bank
93
The advances granted to small business, retail trades, roads and water
transport Operators, professionals, educated self-employed, housing,
etc, are usually covered under the other priority (OPS). During the recent
years the share of OPS to NBC of the PSBs has been increasing. During
the reform period (1991-1996) the share of OPS to NBC of the PSB was
8% to 10%, it got slightly reduced in 1997 and 1998.Since then there was
an increase in the OPS advances. In PSB the lowest level of NPA was 2.4
% in 2002 and in the same level it was 17.1% in 2008 this shows an
increase in the level of NPA. In 1999 the ratio of NPA was 5.6% and there
was reduction until 2002 and steep increase in the level of NPA. In the
highest level the PSB shows an increase ratio. In 1999 it had the
percentage of 17.7 and showed an upward tendency of 39.9% of gross
NPA Bank group wise data shows the NPA level in SBI and its
Associates in lower segment it was 5.6% in 1999 and 2.4% in 2002. This
shows that in the year 2002 the performance of the PSB and S.
BIremains the same. In the highest segment in 1999 the NPA showed
16% of its SSI gross NPA and there was reduction in the level of NPA
in2001which showed 12% under SSI category. Subsequently there was
an increase and it reached to the extent of 39.9% under the highest level
in SSI segment. Bank wise data from 1999 to 2004 the ratio of NPA was
under control i.e. the ratio was less than 30%.Since 2005 onwards they
exceeded the limit of 30% gross NPA. Canara bank in the year 2007 had
36.6% proportion under OPS and it reduced drastically to 25.3% in 2008
and Indian Bank in 2006 and 2007 had 31.8% and 39.4% respectively
Union bank of India showed in 2007 31.3% and in 2008 39%, similarly
94
inter
alia,
by
the
recently
enacted
Securitisation
and
95
to
educational
loan
would
be
100%
as
against
96
Pradesh, Punjab and Rajasthan), the NPA ratio was less than 10 per
cent, while the NPA ratio was higher than 50 per cent in Jharkhand (76.4
per cent) and Bihar (54.5 per cent). NPAs in two States, viz., Jharkhand
and Tamil Nadu declined in 2006-07 as compared with the previous year.
However, the NPA ratio in three States, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and
Punjab, which traditionally had relatively lower NPAs (less than 20 per
cent), declined further, while in two States, Uttarakhand and Rajasthan,
the NPA ratio increased. NPAs, as percentage of advances made by
SCARDBs, varied widely across States at end-March 2007 from 100 per
cent in Manipur to 0.03 per cent in Punjab. In as many as seven States
(Assam, Manipur, Orissa, Jammu and Kashmir, Bihar, Gujarat and Uttar
Pradesh), the NPA ratio was more than 50 per cent. In all, the NPA ratio
in only four States (Punjab, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh and West Bengal)
was less than 20 per cent.
Table 5.6
Gross Non-Performing Assets to Total Advance of Urban Cooperative
Banks
2008
11.7
15.5
12.2
16.1
21.9
19.0
22.7
23.2
18.9
NA
97
Source:RBI Report
Net Non-performing Assets to Total Advance of Urban Cooperative Banks
1999
_
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
13.0
12.1
12.5
12.3
8.8
7.7
The trend analysis in Table 5.6 shows that there is a fluctuation in the
gross NPA of Scheduled Urban Cooperative bank. In 1999 the level of
gross NPA was 11.7% and subsequently in 2002 it increased to 21.9%
and in 2003 it reduced to 19% and again in 2004 it rose to 22.7% and in
2005 it increased to 23.2%. This shows comparing to other sector of
banks cooperative bank has more NPA since they give preferences to
priority and weaker section of the borrowers. The data for net NPA to
98
99
Table 5.7
Percentage of Gross NPA to Gross Advance and Net NPA to Net
Advance of NBFC
Year
Advances
Advances
2001
11.5
5.6
2002
10.6
3.9
2003
8.8
2.7
2004
8.2
2.4
2005
5.7
2.5
2006
3.6
0.5
2007
2.2
0.2
2008
2.1
0*
2009 P
2.7
0*
P: Provisional.
* : Provision exceeds NPA
Source: Half-Yearly Returns.
The trend analysis in Table 5.7 Gross NPA and Net NPA of NBFC clearly
exhibit that there is overall reduction in the Gross and Net NPA since
2001 to 2009.since the Net NPA is calculated after the adjustment made
from the reserves set aside in the balance sheet. In 2001and 2002 the
100
Net NPA is approximately 50% of gross NPA and since 2003 onwards it
is more than 50% difference between Gross NPA and Net NPA.
102
103
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
9.5
9.1
9.6
8.5
10.8
12.3
12.1
18.9
15.7
14.4
13.7
8.3
7.1
13.0
13.9
14.42
14.4
21.3
23.1
2006
2007
2008
13.5
12.8
15.4
5.4
4.2
3.9
13.4
24.5
23.4
22.9
17.5
104
In case of other priority sector the trend shows there was an increase
since 1999 to 2005 and since then there is a reduction in the advances
made by the private banks. In 1999 it was13% priority advances and in
2005 it showed the highest level of the advances 24.5% and later it
showed a reduction in the level of advances. It reduced to 17.5% in 2008.
As compared between SSI and Priority sector level of NPA in SSI
showed positive trend i.e. there was reduction in the level of NPA but the
priority sector showed increased level. The average of all the banks NPA
under priority sector was 30.64% in 2001and NPA increased to 45.35%
under priority sector and in 2008 the level of NPA was 41.61%.This
shows there was a reduction in NPA from 2007 to 2008.As compared to
SSI and Priority Sector the level of NPA under priority sector is very
high. The cause of high level NPA in sector shall be analysed in the
sixth chapter of this research. Bank wise analysis shows the level of
NPA in SBI Commercial and International Bank Ltd had 100% NPA under
priority sector during 2006 and 2008.Nainital Bank had 82.78% in 2001
and 70.15% in 2004. Many other banks at various levels had above 50%
NPA during this research period.
5.5.3. Small Scale Industries (SSI)
The general trend in the level of NPA under SSI is reducing since 2001 to
2008. The percentage of NPA is not available for the year 1999 and
2000.The level of NPA in the year 2001 was 17.73% and it marginally
increased to 17.87% in 2002.Since then 2003 onwards there is a
reduction in the level of NPA from 14.65% to 13.12% in 2008. During this
105
106
of NPA under OPS (Other Priority Sector) had 15.79%, in 2007 the level
increased to 19.29% and reached 19.47% in 2008. Bank wise analysis
revealed Nainital bank had consistently high level of NPA since 2003
0nwards.39.42%, 40.54%, 40.32%, 42.62%, 34.05% and 36.48% for 2003,
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 respectively. Other private banks had
moderate level of NPA and it can be controlled and reduced with proper
implementation and legal formulation which shall be discussed in the
later chapter. (Refer to Appendix 8)
5.5.5 Gross NPA/Gross Advances and Net NPA/ Net Advance
Table 5.9
Year
1999
11.5
7.68
2000
9.74
6.25
2001
10.22
6.58
2002
11.22
7.12
2003
10.65
6.57
2004
9.71
5.39
2005
7.12
3.84
2006
4.96
1.93
2007
4.44
1.57
2008
2.48
0.91
107
108
This statistics shows that the reserves retained by the bank during this
period could adjust the gross NPA and mitigate majority of the NPA and
reduce its net NPA level. Table 5.10 as stated below.
Table 5.10
YEAR
1999
Gross NPA %
5.55
NET NPA %
3.35
2000
4.45
2.85
2001
4.73
2.97
2002
4.89
3.15
2003
4.87
2.93
2004
4.41
2.22
2005
3.76
1.7
2006
2.81
1.04
2007
1.98
0.87
2008
1.32
0.5
109
5.5.7
Table 5.11
Gross Profit/Loss and Net Profit/Loss
Year
Gross Profit
Net Profit
1999
1.42
0.72
2000
1.86
1.34
2001
1.67
0.48
2002
2.35
0.95
2003
2.41
0.84
2004
2.36
0.85
2005
1.48
0.23
2006
1.58
0.50
2007
1.68
-0.02
2008
1.85
0.98
The aforesaid Table 5.11 shows the comparison between the Gross
Profit/Loss and Net Profit/Loss. In 1999 the gross profit made by the
private banks were 1.42% and net profit was 0.72 which means in 1999
the net profit earned is 50% of the gross profit. There is no stability in
the profitability of the private banking sector. The earning varies from
110
year to year. Since the profit depends upon various other factors such
as the success of the borrower there is fluctuation in the earning
capacity of the banks. In 2002 the gross profit earned by the private
banking sector was 2.35%, in 2003 the gross profit was 2.41% and 2004
again it reduced to 2.36%. In 2008 the gross profit earned by the private
banks was 1.85%.Similarly the net profit earned by the banks were
0.72% and in 2001 the net profit was 0.48 and again there is a dip in the
profit in the year 2005 0.23% of the profit and in 2007 further there is a
reduction of profit which reveals -0.02.in 2008 it achieved gross profit of
1.98% and net profit was0.98, almost 50% of the gross profit.
5.6. Conclusions:
In many other studies the researchers have done a study separately Public
Sector bank, Private Sector Bank, Cooperative Banks. In this research the
detailed study has been covered by comparison and the position has been
highlighted. Minute details have been included and each sector has been
analyzed. In this chapter secondary data are collected and the analysis
along with the graphical representations has been made. Performances of
public banks are better as compared to other banking sectors. NBFC is
recommended to increase the level of advances to various other sectors.
111
CHAPTER 6
POLICIES AND STAGE WISE ANALYSIS OF DATA ON NPA
6.1. Introduction
This chapter is divided into four parts, namely
Stage I Policies and Procedural Analysis
Stage II Appraisal stage
Stage III Disbursement stage
Stage IV Post Disbursement stage
Sample Collections are carried in the following manner:
Types of Banks
Total No. of
Sample
Banks
size
Public Banks
20
18
SBI subsidiaries
07
07
22
15
53
15
114
30
81
112
No of
14
Agriculture
31
Weaker
Non-
Section
priority
16
36
Responses
Solution:
The Data Collected is Unbiased.
Every Response can only be any of the one response above, i.e. 1/4.
Total no of Responses are 97 i.e. 97 X 1/4 = 24.5
113
Observed
Desired
(Oi -
Frequency OiF
Frequency Ei
Ei)
SSI
14
24.25
-10.25
105.06
4.33
Agriculture
31
24.25
6.75
45.56
1.88
16
24.25
-8.25
68.06
2.81
36
24.25
11.75
138.06
5.69
(Oi - Ei)
(Oi - Ei)
/Ei
Weaker
Section
Nonpriority
14.71
Less than
Rs.25,000
Rs.50,000 to
Rs.1,00,000
Banks business
Rs.25,000
to
Rs.1,00,000
and Above
(deposits + advances)
Rs.50,000
(Rs. in crore)
Co-op Bank
87%
13%
0%
0%
NBFC
42%
14%
29%
14%
Private Sector
43%
13%
25%
19%
Public Sector
0%
0%
12%
88%
Cumulative Score
37%
8%
15%
40%
114
Analysis Reveals
Public Sector is the Dominating player, as it has the maximum share in
terms of the Business. Cumulative score has an equal share from the
co-operative as well as Public Sector Bank. 88% of the public sector
banks have a business above 1, 00,000 Crores. Majority of the Cooperative Banks has a turnover less than 25000 Crores. In case of NDFC
and private Bank less than 50% has the business less than 25000
Crores.29% of NBFC and 25% of Private Banks have business above
50000 Crores and up to 100000 Crores.
q2_a
YES
NO
Co-op Bank
93%
7%
NBFC
100%
0%
Private Sector
100%
0%
Public Sector
100%
0%
Cumulative Score
98%
2%
115
Analysis Reveals
All the banks incorporated the integrated management except few of the
cooperative banks Because of the size of the banks. Total 15 SUC banks
were asked this information out of which 93% had integrated
management and also adopted modern technology. As far as PSB,
Private Banks, NBFC all the banks adopted integrated management. PSB
was 25 in number including. The SBI and its associates, Private banks
were 15 in number and NBFC were 30 in number.
YES
NO
Co-op Bank
100%
0%
NBFC
100%
0%
Private Sector
100%
0%
Public Sector
100%
0%
Cumulative Score
100%
0%
Analysis Reveals
All the Banks under study compulsorily follows the Operational Risk
Management Policy. The question asked was close end questions and
116
100% were in positive reaction stating that their banks have adopted the
necessary operational policy in relation to the NPA policy.
YES
NO
Co-op Bank
100%
0%
NBFC
100%
0%
Private Sector
100%
0%
Public Sector
100%
0%
Cumulative Score
100%
0%
NPA
Analysis Reveals
All the Banks under study compulsorily follows the Operational Risk
Management Policy. The question asked was close end questions and
100% were in positive reaction stating that their banks have adopted
the necessary operational policy in relation to the NPA policy
117
YES
NO
Co-op Bank
100%
0%
NBFC
100%
0%
Private Sector
100%
0%
Public Sector
96%
4%
Cumulative Score
98%
2%
Analysis Reveals
Analysis Reveals
All the banks have adopted the information technology to meet the
customers needs and only a small portion of the public sector ban has
not adopted the information technology. As far as NBFC, Private Banks
and Cooperative banks showed 100% for adoption of technology
3
Early
Alert
Advance
stage
Stage
Stage
Co-op Bank
74%
13%
13%
NBFC
29%
71%
0%
Private Sector
32%
42%
26%
Public Sector
45%
45%
10%
Cumulative Score
46%
41%
13%
118
Analysis Reveals
Analysis Reveals
Equal Responses have been observed during the Early stage and Alert
Stage, Pertaining to Planning of measurement of NPA. Reasonable
share of 13% have an Intervention an Advanced Stage, which is majorly
contributed by Private sector. NBFC is more stringent in their rules and
shall take appropriate action against the borrowers at an early stage
itself.
4 How would you
Poor
slow
Moderate
Good
Co-op Bank
0%
13%
40%
47%
NBFC
13%
29%
29%
29%
Private Sector
12%
44%
22%
22%
Public Sector
4%
23%
15%
58%
Cumulative Score
7%
27%
24%
42%
119
Analysis Reveals
42% of the cumulative score says their progress is Good. Almost equal
% has the opinion on Slow and Moderate Progress. Across Groups the
Responses for Poor and Slow are Minor as compare to Moderate and
Good
What
is
the
Less
Above
Above
Above
quantum of losses
than
25%-
50%-75%
75%
because of frauds
25%
50%
Co-op Bank
100%
0%
0%
0%
NBFC
88%
12%
0%
0%
Private Sector
100%
0%
0%
0%
Public Sector
96%
0%
4%
0%
Cumulative Score
97%
2%
1%
0%
in your bank?
120
Analysis Reveals
All the Banks under study had expressed the Quantum of Losses
because of frauds to be less than 25%.In case of private banks and Cooperative Banks all the respondents accepted for fraud less than
25%.As per information provided by the NBFC 13% of fraud lie between
25% and 50%.4% of the public banks were of the opinion that their fraud
lie between 50% and 75% fraud.
Low
Medium
High
Co-op Bank
7%
33%
53%
7%
NBFC
13%
24%
63%
0%
Private Sector
20%
33%
33%
14%
Public Sector
36%
40%
16%
8%
Cumulative Score
22%
35%
35%
8%
outstanding entries in
priority sector in Bank?
121
Analysis Reveals
Majority of the banks under study belongs to low and medium term
outstanding.High score of outstsanding is against the private banks.the
study revels that 53% of the priority sector outstanding against the
cooperative banks and 63% against NBFC.Private sector shows almost
equal distribution between low and medium outstanding.The study
revels that in case of public sector bank 36% of the respondent banks
informed that their outstanding againt priority sector is poor and 40%
accpt it as moderate outstanding.
Have you responded to RBIs NPA
7
YES
NO
Co-op Bank
87%
13%
NBFC
88%
12%
Private Sector
94%
6%
Public Sector
100%
0%
Cumulative Score
94%
6%
Supervision?
122
Analysis Reveals
Marjory All the Banks under study Responded to RBIs Risk Based
Supervision. Exceptions are Co-operative banks and NBFC, followed by
Private Sector with a minor share. 100% Public Sector banks followed
the Risk Based Supervision. 94% Private Banks, 88% NBFC, And 87% of
Co-operative Banks followed these procedures.
Low
Medium High
NIL
14%
72%
14%
0%
NBFC
50%
25%
0%
25%
Private Sector
15%
69%
8%
8%
Public Sector
33%
48%
14%
5%
Cumulative Score
27%
55%
11%
7%
123
Analysis Reveals
Majorly All the Banks under study Expressed Medium and Low View on
the Regulatory measure proposed by BIS on NPA.50% of NBFC is of the
opinion that the regulatory measures proposed by BIS are low, 71% of
the Co-operative Bank ,69% Private Sector banks,48% of the opinion
that the Regulatory measures provided by BSI is medium in nature.14%
each Co-operative Bank and Public Sector Banks is of the opinion that
Regulatory measure proposed by BSI is high level. No NBFC opines the
measures proposed are high.
9
According to you
Less
25% to
50% to
Above
than
50%
75%
75%
the regulatory
25%
measures proposed
by BIS on NPA?
Co-op Bank
25%
37%
13%
25%
NBFC
100%
0%
0%
0%
Private Sector
70%
30%
0%
0%
Public Sector
53%
16%
21%
11%
Cumulative Score
54%
23%
13%
10%
124
Analysis Reveals
Majorly All the Banks under study Expressed that the Percentage is
below 50%. Reasonable share of 23% of cumulative share can be
observed for above 50%. 100% NBFC, 70% Private Bank and 53% Public
sector Banks is of the opinion that 25% are the regulatory measures
proposed by the bank.37% Co-operative Banks, 30% private Banks and
16% ranges between 25% to 50% proposed by BSI on NPA.13% Cooperative Banks and 21% Public Sector Banks are of the opinion that it
ranges between 50% to 75% and 25% Cooperative Bank and 11% are
above 75% proposed by BSI on NPA.
10
What percentage of
Less
25% to
50%
Above
account attributes
than
50%
to
75%
25%
Co-op Bank
87%
13%
0%
0%
NBFC
86%
0%
14%
0%
Private Sector
100%
0%
0%
0%
Public Sector
84%
8%
8%
0%
Cumulative Score
89%
6%
5%
0%
75%
125
Analysis Reveals
Majorly All the Banks under study Expressed that the Percentage is
below 25%.Above 25% to 75%NPA is observed by 11% cumulative,
which is major contributed by NBFC, Co-operative bank followed by
Public Sector under study. 87% Co-operative Bank,86% NBFC, 100%
Private Bank and 84% Public sector has expressed their opinion that
less than 25% of the account outstanding in their bank is NPA.
11
What precautions
does your bank
Security
measures
Collateral
adopt in providing
Security
loan to the
customer?
Co-op Bank
11%
11%
78%
0%
NBFC
30%
10%
60%
0%
Private Sector
18%
14%
63%
5%
Public Sector
24%
15%
56%
5%
Cumulative Score
20%
13%
63%
4%
126
Analysis Reveals
Majority of the Banks under study prefers Guarantee & Collateral
Security both. NBFC Focuses approximately 1/3 component as Collateral
Security and nearly 2/3 accepts both Guarantee and collateral
simultaneously.30% of NBFC and 24% Public Sector Bank accepts only
collateral security. Nominal percentage such as 14% private and 15%
public Sector banks accept only Guarantee. High percentage of banks
such as 78% Co-operative Bank, 60% NBFC, 63% Private Sector Bank
and 56% Public Sector Banks accept both Guarantee and collateral
security.
12
Retail
Education
Agricultur
Personal
Loan
al Loan
al Loan
Loan
Co-op Bank
29%
24%
26%
21%
NBFC
25%
25%
25%
25%
Private Sector
31%
20%
31%
18%
Public Sector
30%
35%
35%
0%
Cumulative Score
29%
27%
31%
13%
provide to your
customer?
127
Analysis Reveals
Majority of the Banks under study prefers Retail and Agricultural loan.
Public Sector bank doesnt prefer Personal Loan. Almost all the sector
gives equal importance to all kinds of loan except Public Sector Banks..
31% of the private banks gives loan to this category. Public Sector bank
gives equal preferences to educational loan and agricultural loan. 35%
each category the preference is provided by the Public Sector Banks.
NBFC gives equal preference in all the categories.
13
18 years
Above 25
Above 40
Above
to 25
years - 40
years - 60
60
prefer in providing
years
years
years
years
Co-op Bank
11%
54%
35%
0%
NBFC
26%
37%
37%
0%
Private Sector
14%
46%
36%
4%
Public Sector
26%
34%
27%
13%
Cumulative Score
20%
41%
32%
7%
credit to the
customer? Why?
128
Analysis Reveals
Most Preferable age group for providing Loan is 25 - 40, as compared
below 25 and above 60 yrs. 26% of NBFC and public sector banks prefer
to give loan to the age group of 18 years to 25 years. Majority of the COoperative Banks and private banks give preference of loan to borrower
above 25 years and up to the age of 40 years.54% of the Co-operative
banks and 46% of private banks prefer to give loan to borrowers less
than 40 years. 37% of the NBFC gives loan to age between the ages of
40 to 60 years.
1
Sale of
Filing a
Appointing
up measures in
Collateral
suit in the
Recovery
reading the
Security
Court
Agent
Co-op Bank
43%
27%
20%
NBFC
29%
29%
39%
Private Sector
37%
40%
17%
Public Sector
36%
40%
24%
Cumulative Score
37%
36%
24%
outstanding credit?
129
Analysis Reveals
More than 75% prefers to Collateral Security, and Filing suit for
outstanding credit. Appointing of Recovery Agent is most preferred by
NBFC and least preferred by Private Sector.43% of the CO-operative
Banks prefer sale of securities in case of default in the payment of loan
amount.37% in case of Private Banks and 36% in case of Public Sector
Banks.40% each Private Bank and public bank prefer to file a suit in the
court. Maximum preference is given by a recovery agent for the
collection of outstanding dues. 3% NBFC did not respond to this
question and 6% of private sector did not respond to this question.
Does your Bank prefer
15 Mortgage?
Pledge
Mortgage
Co-op Bank
6%
94%
NBFC
0%
100%
Private Sector
32%
68%
Public Sector
23%
77%
Cumulative Score
19%
81%
130
Analysis Reveals
Majority of the Banks under study Prefers Mortgage, over pledge. Pledge
is preferred to some extend only by Public and Private sector Banks.6%
Co-operative Banks prefer only pledge and 32% private banks prefer
pledge and 23% prefer pledge.94% Co-operative Banks prefer mortgage
100% NBFC prefer Mortgage.68% Private Bank and 77% public Banks
prefer mortgage of the property.
16
0-25
26-50
50-75
75-100
Co-op Bank
67%
0%
0%
33%
NBFC
33%
67%
0%
0%
Private Sector
75%
25%
0%
0%
Public Sector
79%
16%
5%
0%
Cumulative Score
73%
21%
3%
3%
131
Analysis Reveals
73% agrees that Issue of credit card has been a cause for NPA for range
of less than 25%. 67% of the Co-operative is of the opinion that if the
credit card is issued it could cause at least less than 25% of NPA. Hence
the cooperative banks do not prefer credit card. They prefer Kissan Card.
NBFC is also of the same opinion like the Co-operative banks. 75% of
private Banks and 79% of the Public Sector banks share the same views
that it could cause less than 75% of NPA if the cards are issued.67% of
NBFC share the same views as that of a private banks.
17
What measures do
Educational
Background
Age
Monthly
Value
Wages
Of
Asset
to your customer?
Co-op Bank
13%
13%
61%
13%
NBFC
0%
50%
50%
0%
Private Sector
24%
38%
33%
5%
Public Sector
19%
33%
44%
4%
Cumulative Score
18%
34%
43%
5%
132
Analysis Reveals
The Cooperative Banks refer to their Kissan credit card only should be
able to read and write and basic literacy.13% cooperative bank deals
with the educational ad age factor of the card holder. 61% give
importance to the monthly remuneration of the card holder.13%.In case
of default the lender can recover the money from sale of the property.
50% each NBFC gives importance to age and wages in case of issue of
credit card. In case of private banks 24% provide weight age to
educational background,38% weight age to the age of the borrowers and
33% weight age to the monthly income of the borrowers so that the
bankers can avoid the account to be termed as NPA. 19% public sector
bank gives importance to educational background.
18
High
Medium
Low
None
of educational
Risk
Risk
Risk
of the
loan?
above
Co-op Bank
7%
46%
40%
7%
NBFC
0%
100%
0%
0%
Private Sector
20%
60%
7%
13%
Public Sector
15%
54%
31%
0%
Cumulative Score
13%
57%
25%
5%
133
Analysis Reveals
Majority in the study group feels Educational Loan to be of Low and
Medium Risk. 40% and 46% 0f the Cooperative banks feels that risk
involved is either low or medium as the case may be.100% NBFC
respondent feel that it is medium risk. 20% of the private banks opine
the educational rule has high risk than any other kinds and 50% accept
to high risk in business. In case of public banks 54% of the public
sector banks identifies as medium risk and 31% as low risk
19
Which level of
Officer
Manager
management is
General
Vice-
Manager
Presid
ent
made accountable
for not recovering
the outstanding
credit?
Co-op Bank
26%
61%
9%
4%
NBFC
0%
87%
13%
0%
Private Sector
19%
47%
29%
5%
Public Sector
29%
48%
17%
6%
Cumulative Score
23%
55%
17%
5%
134
Analysis Reveals
The Trend observed is the Manager is Primarily held accountable then
followed
by
officer
grade
for
not
recovering
the
outstanding
Bank
Employee Customer
Co-op Bank
25%
37%
38%
NBFC
33%
17%
50%
Private Sector
13%
20%
67%
Public Sector
26%
43%
31%
Cumulative Score
24%
34%
42%
135
Analysis Reveals
Reasonable share of responses also agrees that employee and bank
shall also be made liable. Cooperative banks under this prevailing
situation equal percentage have stated that the employee and the
customer should be made liable 33% of NBFC is of the opinion that in
case of outstanding amount employee should be made liable and 50%
by the customer. 67% of the responses of the private bank are customer
should be made liable. 43% and 31% of the responses of the public bank
is employee and customer respectively.
21
Initial
Will Full
Persistent
None of
The
Above
CIBIL helps in
bringing awareness
to the bank?
Co-op Bank
17%
17%
58%
8%
NBFC
9%
58%
33%
0%
Private Sector
12%
58%
24%
6%
Public Sector
30%
37%
33%
0%
Cumulative Score
19%
43%
35%
3%
136
Analysis Reveals
The awareness is largely being brought in case of will full Defaulters,
followed by Persistent Defaulters. In case of response received for
cooperative Banks 17% is in favour of the initial default. Similarly 17%
received is in favour of wilful default.58% is in favour of persistent
default. In case of NBFC 58% response received is in favour of wilful
default and 33% is in favour of persistent default. private Banks
response states that majority response is in favour of wilful default i.e.
58% is in favour of wilful default and 24% is in favour of persistent
default. Only 12% responses were under the opinion that initial default
could be a cause of NPA. The response from Public Sector Bank is
almost equal in all level.30% is in favour of initial default, 37% is in
favour of wilful default and 33% is in favour persistent default.
137
22
In realizing the
Recovery
Files
Meeting
Appointm
amount whom
agent
Suit
with
ent of
Borrower
Arbitrator
11%
27%
31%
31%
NBFC
18%
26%
30%
26%
Private Sector
18%
31%
40%
11%
Public Sector
22%
35%
39%
4%
Cumulative Score
18%
31%
36%
15%
Analysis Reveals
Meeting with the Borrower is the Most Preferred way for Recovery. Filing
a suit is the second most preferred option for recovery, dominating by
Public sector banks. Meeting with the borrower is most acceptable
wherein 31% each meeting with borrowers and appointing arbitrator 27%
response prefer to file a suit and 11% prefer to appoint recovery agent. In
case of NBFC 26% each of response goes in favour of filing a suit and
appointing arbitrator,30% response is for meeting the borrower and 18%
in case of recovery agent. In case of private sector 31% is in favour of
filing a suit and 40% is in favour of meeting the borrower. Other category
has only marginal response. In case of public sector banks 35%
138
Low
Medium High
66%
7%
27%
0%
NBFC
0%
100%
0%
0%
Private Sector
13%
75%
6%
6%
Public Sector
65%
27%
8%
0%
Cumulative Score
45%
42%
11%
2%
Analysis Reveals
Majorly Banks under study consider Low and Medium Level contribution
in terms of recovery cost impacting banks profit. 66% of the response is
in favour of low cost involved
response states high level of cost involved with the result reducing the
profitability of the banks. In case of NBFC 100% response received is in
favour of medium cost involved and to that extent they opine that
139
Farmers
Students
Weaker
Vendors
Section
Cards?
Co-op Bank
50%
0%
0%
50%
NBFC
0%
33%
33%
34%
Private Sector
11%
33%
33%
23%
Public Sector
24%
34%
26%
16%
Cumulative Score
20%
33%
27%
20%
Analysis Reveals
Issuing of Credit Card to Farmers is only encouraged by the Co-op
Banks, followed by Public Sectors. Co-operative Bank issues credit card
i.e. Kissan card to farmers and vendors who are dealing in cultivated
goods as vendors. Private, Public and NBFC have moreover similar
140
Which Section of
Farmers
Students Weaker
Vendors
Section
people contribute
maximum credit
card outstanding?
Co-op Bank
63%
0%
0%
37%
NBFC
0%
50%
0%
50%
Private Sector
20%
40%
30%
10%
Public Sector
13%
41%
29%
17%
Cumulative Score
17%
35%
33%
15%
141
Analysis Reveals
As Students and weaker Sections are Preferred in terms of issuing of
credit card, hence their contribution towards outstanding is High, as
compare to farmers and Vendors in case of private banks and PSB. In
case of co-operative sector there is high level of outstanding amount
from the farmers and vendors. As far as NBFC is concerned the analysis
revels that they do not prefer to give to farmers. In Cooperative Bank
farmers outstanding amount is 63% where as vendors outstanding
amount is 37%.In case of NBFC student contribution to outstanding
dues and vendors contribution is equal i.e. 50% each. In case of private
banks all section contribute to the outstanding amount out of which 40%
outstanding amount is from student, 30% from weaker sections, 20%
farmer and 10% from vendor. PSB is similar to private banks wherein all
the sections contributes to outstanding amount against the card.41%
from students,29% from weaker section, 17% from vendor and 13%
against farmers.
26
Sanction
Monitoring
NPA
Recovery
measures adopted by
the bank in recovery
procedures?
Co-op Bank
16%
48%
36%
NBFC
17%
39%
44%
Private Sector
16%
39%
43%
Public Sector
3%
63%
34%
Cumulative Score
11%
50%
38%
142
Analysis Reveals
Half of the group have adopted remedial measures at Monitoring level,
followed by NPA Recovery level .In case of Co-operative banks the
remedial measures adopted at the time of monitoring is 48% whereas
NBFC and private bank has 39% remedial measures and PSB has made
63% provisions against monitoring stage. During NPA recovery stage
36% in case of co-operative banks, 44% in case of NBFC, 43% in case of
private banks and 34% in case of PSB.2% of the private bank did not
respond.
27
Within the
Beyond
Time Limit
Time Limit
Co-op Bank
71%
29%
NBFC
50%
50%
Private Sector
71%
29%
Public Sector
66%
34%
Cumulative Score
65%
35%
your customer?
143
Analysis Reveals
Apart from NBFC, all other amongst the group majorly recover the
money within the Time Limit. Beyond the Time limit is almost 50% in
case of NBFC, rest others have reasonable share. On analysing it is very
evident that NBFC has 50% share in both stages i.e. within time limit and
beyond time limit whereas Co-operative bank has 71%, Private Banks
71% and PSB 66% within time limit. In case beyond time limit Cooperative bank has 29%, Private bank has 29% and PSB has 34%
respectively.
28
Whether a Foreign
India
Foreign
Partly in
Country
India and
partly in
if yes, whether it be
Foreign
availed overseas?
Country
Co-op Bank
71%
29%
0%
Private Sector
64%
36%
0%
Public Sector
49%
21%
30%
Cumulative Score
55%
26%
19%
NBFC
144
Analysis Reveals
Majority of the Foreign Currency is given in India only, where as foreign
Country comprises to 26%.NBFC has no foreign currency arrangement.
Hence it shows Nil. Private sector and Public sector has these kinds of
facilities for their customers. Private Banks and PSB also facilitate the
availability of foreign currency loan in India as well as outside India. Cooperative bank need to cater special arrangement for such functions
with the help of RBI and other banks.
Housing
Complex
Commercial
Complex
25%
33%
33%
9%
NBFC
24%
35%
24%
17%
Private Sector
29%
38%
19%
14%
Public Sector
19%
27%
29%
25%
22%
32%
27%
19%
Agricultural
Under
Land
Developed
areas
Cumulative
Score
145
Analysis Reveals
With respect to financing for developmental Project, Commercial
Projects are most Preferred, followed by Agricultural and Housing
Project. Under the study Cooperative bank preferred 33% commercial
complex loan, 33% finance for the development of agricultural land, 25%
finance for housing complex and 9% for underdeveloped areas. NBFC
prefers to finance for commercial project than housing and agricultural
purpose. Private bank give more preference to commercial development
secondly to housing complex and then to agricultural land and at last to
the underdeveloped areas. Public bank through their study explains that
more preference is given to agricultural land then to the commercial
development land, thirdly underdeveloped areas and lastly for the
commercial purpose.
146
30
Priority
Cooperative
Weaker
Commercial
Section
Establishment
loan to their
borrowers?
Co-op Bank
43%
18%
18%
21%
NBFC
20%
27%
6%
47%
Private Sector
43%
17%
17%
23%
Public Sector
30%
25%
27%
18%
Cumulative Score
34%
22%
21%
23%
Analysis Reveals
Every Institution has their own set Priority sector, which they prefer to
Lend over the other sector. The Cooperative banks feedback shows that
they provide more facilities to priority sector than cooperative societies.
Besides this sector to have better viability 21% Co-operative banks
highlighted more preference to the Commercial establishment. 18%
each to weaker and cooperative sector. NBFC has a high preferential
treatment to commercial establishment followed by Cooperative sector.
Since Cooperative movement brings about certain unity amongst the
members NBFC gives second preference to this kind of movement.43%
loan is provided by NBFC to priority sector to the tune of 43% and
147
31
NonAgriculture Weaker
Section priority
Which sector
contributes
maximum NPA in
their bank and
their percentage?
Co-op Bank
26%
17%
17%
40%
NBFC
0%
40%
0%
60%
Private Sector
13%
30%
17%
40%
Public Sector
12%
39%
20%
29%
Cumulative Score
14%
33%
16%
37%
SSI
Analysis Reveals
NBFC observes a Bigger share of NPA, from Non Priority Sector.
considering the groups cumulative score. Maximum NPA is from Non
148
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
87%
13%
NBFC
75%
25%
Private Bank
80%
20%
Public Sector
72%
28%
Cumulative Score
78%
22%
appraisal
149
Analysis Reveals
Majority of the Group Agrees, that there is a lack of critical presentation
Appraisal. Cooperative bank strongly agrees where as PSB has shown a
reasonable amount of disagreement.87%, 75%, 80% and 72% of
Cooperative banks, NBFC, Private Bank and PSB feel one of the causes
for account becoming bad or NPA is the criticality of the business is not
properly presented by the borrower. As compared to critical agreement
proportion of disagreement is very nominal.
Part A_2
Deliberate attempt of
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
80%
20%
NBFC
75%
25%
Private Bank
87%
13%
Public Sector
60%
40%
Cumulative Score
73%
27%
loose appraisal
150
Analysis Reveals
Majority of the group in the study agrees that there is a deliberate
attempt of loose appraisal. 87% of the private banks strongly agree to
this factor and 40% of the PSB strongly disagrees to this factor. The
analysis shows that the banker is unable to get the clear idea about the
borrowers business and their intention. 80% 0f the co-operative bank
and 75% of the NBFC also agrees along with the private sector banks.
Cumulatively73% of the banks strongly accept regarding the concept of
deliberate attempt of loose appraisal and 27% banks cumulatively
disagrees to this concept.
Part A_3
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
53%
47%
NBFC
62%
38%
Private Bank
80%
20%
Public Sector
56%
44%
Cumulative Score
62%
38%
151
Analysis Reveals
Majority of the Group Agrees, that there are unrealistic projects
submitted by borrower, but Reasonably good Amount of Responses say
that they Disagree. Private Bank strongly agrees where in Co-operative
banks has reasonable disagreement Cumulative score of 62% shows
that the bankers is of the opinion that there are unrealistic project
submission is one of the cause for NPA. Similarly There is a strong
support from the private sector bank to the extent of 80% of the private
banks in the study sample was of the opinion that they present project
submission which may be partially unrealistic or it may be fully
unrealistic.62% of the NBFC, 53% of the Co-operative and 56% agrees to
the views of the private banks. 38% cumulatively disagreed to the views
of projection of unrealistic views.
Part
Preparation of incorrect
A_4
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
33%
67%
NBFC
62%
38%
Private Bank
67%
33%
Public Sector
16%
84%
Cumulative Score
38%
62%
Analysis Reveals
152
Analysis Reveals
When the question was raised to the respondent the study sample
revealed that majority of the banks disagreed to the incorrect loan
repayment schedule. As per the study conducted the sample shows
private banks strongly agrees but PSB strongly disagrees to this
statement. Cumulative score of 62% disagrees and 38%agreed to this
schedule.67% Private bank and 62% NBFC agreed to default repayment
and 67% Co-operative and 84% PSB disagreed to default repayment.
Part
A_5
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
53%
47%
NBFC
37%
63%
Private Bank
80%
20%
Public Sector
72%
28%
Cumulative Score
65%
35%
153
Analysis Reveals
Majority of the Group agrees, and reasonable strength responded
disagreement. PSB strongly feels that there is improper assessment
where in NBFC strongly disagrees with it.80% of Private banks and 72%
of PSB agreed to the statement that improper assessment is one of the
factor for bad loan or NPA.63% of the NBFC disagreed and 47%
Cooperative banks disagreed regarding improper assessment of
repayment schedule. Cumulatively 65% of the banks agreed for this
statement and 35% disagreed.
Part
A_6
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
53%
47%
NBFC
37%
63%
Private Bank
50%
50%
Public Sector
56%
44%
Cumulative Score
52%
48%
154
Analysis Reveals
All the Group under study has almost 50 - 50 view, pertaining to non
availability of reliable market study.50% of the Private banks,53% of
Cooperative banks and 56% PSB agrees to the non availability of the
reliable market study and 63% NBFC strongly disagrees to the non
availability and cumulative score of 52% banks agreed and 48%
disagreed.
Part A_7
Non-Availability of Industry wise data on
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
53%
47%
NBFC
50%
50%
Private Bank
60%
40%
Public Sector
64%
36%
Cumulative Score
59%
41%
Analysis Reveals
Majority group in the study agrees to Non availability of Industry wise
data, to which a reasonable strength disagrees. Public sector strongly
155
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
67%
33%
NBFC
50%
50%
Private Bank
93%
7%
Public Sector
56%
44%
Cumulative Score
67%
33%
Analysis Reveals
Majority group in the study agrees that relying on the unaudited and
provisional data is one of the factors for NPA to which a reasonable
strength disagrees. Private bank strongly agrees to the same to which
NBFC disagrees. NBFC have almost 50-50 views on these issues.
Cumulative score of 67% agrees to this fact of unaudited and
156
provisional data and 33% disagree to the fact. 93% of private banks,67%
of Cooperative bank and56% strongly agrees to
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
80%
20%
NBFC
63%
37%
Private Bank
93%
7%
Public Sector
72%
28%
Cumulative Score
78%
22%
Analysis Reveals
Majority in the groups agree that there is lack of network system
amongst the branches /banks enabling the borrowers to enjoy the fund
from more than one bank. Multiple borrowing is one of the factors for an
account turning NPA. Cumulative score of 72% banks from the study
group have accepted and 28% disagrees.93% private banks, 80%
157
cooperative banks and 72% PSB agree. In case of NBFC 63% agrees and
37% disagrees to the fact.
Part A_10
Lack of confidence in credit
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
13%
87%
NBFC
37%
63%
Private Bank
53%
47%
Public Sector
24%
76%
Cumulative Score
30%
70%
officers
Analysis Reveals
Majority group in the study disagrees of having 70% score in the study
group and 30% agrees to this issue as a cause of NPA.87% of
Cooperative banks, 63% of NBFC ,76% of PSB disagreed to this
response when questioned to them.53% of Private banks accepted on
this factor. Majority disagrees of having lack of confidence in the credit
officers and minor strength agrees to it.
158
Part A_11
Lack of knowledge in the subject to
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
20%
80%
NBFC
25%
75%
Private Bank
40%
60%
Public Sector
32%
68%
Cumulative Score
30%
70%
credit officer
Analysis Reveals
70% cumulative scores disagree to the factor regarding lack of
knowledge in the Subject to credit officers.80% of Co-operative banks
and 75% of NBFC strongly disagreed to the lack of knowledge of the
credit officers. Whereas 68% PSB disagreed. The opinion of the private
banks and public banks were almost identical.40% of private banks
agreed to this factor and 32% of PSB agreed. Minor strength agreed and
majority strength disagreed.
159
Part A_12
Lack of Economy Lack of
economic Study on the Production
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
73%
27%
NBFC
50%
50%
Private Bank
53%
47%
Public Sector
48%
52%
Cumulative Score
56%
44%
Analysis Reveals
Majority in the study sample agrees to the fact regarding the lack of
economic viability on the production activity of the borrowers business.
NBFC has 50-50 views on this factor.73% of the Co-operative banks and
53% of private banks agrees to this issues.52% of the PSB disagrees to
the fact that the lenders have lack of knowledge on the economic
viability of the borrowers business production. Cumulative Score of
56% agrees and 44% disagrees.
160
Part A_13
Fear of staff accountability on account
turning NPA in future in the mind of credit
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
87%
13%
NBFC
63%
37%
Private Bank
67%
33%
Public Sector
52%
48%
Cumulative Score
65%
35%
Analysis Reveals
65% of the study sample agrees for the factor that staff fear for being
held responsible for any account going wrong.35% disagrees on this
response.87% Co-operative banks, 63% NBFC, 67% Private banks and
52% PSB agrees to this responsibility to be shared by the staff. On
analyzing the figures it is found that almost the opinion of PSB agreeing
and disagreeing similar.
161
Part A_14
Absence of right to select good
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
40%
60%
NBFC
37%
63%
Private Bank
80%
20%
Public Sector
56%
44%
Cumulative Score
56%
44%
Analysis Reveals
Officer in charge of credit department exclusively does not have the
right to choose the borrowers. They can perform their duties through
certain predetermined policy.60% of the Co-operative Banks disagrees
on this fact. similarly 63% NBFC disagrees on this views.80% of the
Private banks asserts this views and 56% PSB also asserted their views
and agreed to this fact regarding lack of power to choose by the credit
department. Average of the cumulative score shows that 56% agrees
and 44% disagrees to the absence of right to select good borrowers by
the credit department.
162
Part A_15
Non-availability of skilled/ trained staff
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
33%
67%
NBFC
12%
88%
Private Bank
60%
40%
Public Sector
40%
60%
Cumulative Score
40%
60%
in credit department
Analysis Reveals
60% of the average cumulative score of the sample study disagrees
about the non availability of the skilled staff in the credit department to
which 40% agrees. Sector wise analysis shows that 67% of the Cooperative banks, 88% of the NBFC and 60% of the PSB strongly
disagrees to the fact about the non availability of the skilled staff in the
department. 60% of the private bank agrees to this fact regarding non
availability of the skilled staff in the department is one of the cause for
the account turning NPA.
163
Part A_16
Fraudulent approach of borrowers
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
46%
54%
NBFC
25%
75%
Private Bank
80%
20%
Public Sector
36%
64%
Cumulative Score
48%
52%
Analysis Reveals
Average of the cumulative score of the study group has almost similar
views about borrowers having fraudulent approach. Cumulative score
shows 52% disagreed and 48% agreed to the fraudulent approach of the
borrowers. Sectoral analysis of the study sample shows that 54% of the
Co-operative bank,75% 0f the NBFC,and 64% of the PSB disagrees to
the fraudulent approach of the banks.80% of the private banks agrees to
the fact that borrowers fraudulent approach can be one of the cause for
NPA in banking industry.
164
Part A_17
Fraudulent and irresponsible attitude of
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
67%
33%
NBFC
75%
25%
Private Bank
79%
21%
Public Sector
37%
63%
Cumulative Score
59%
41%
bank officials
Analysis Reveals
Average of the cumulative score of group under study agrees to which
41% of the banks disagree and 59% agree with respect to bank official
having fraudulent and irresponsible attitude. 67% of the Co-operative
banks, 75% of NBFC and 79% private banks agrees with fraudulent and
irresponsible attitude of the bank officials but opinion of PSB differ from
these views.63% of PSB disagree with the views of other sectoral banks
and financial institution.
165
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
33%
67%
NBFC
75%
25%
Private Bank
67%
33%
Public Sector
72%
28%
Cumulative Score
62%
38%
Analysis Reveals
On comparison between long relationship and project viability the
majority views highlight the preference of relationship over the project
viability.67% of the study sample under Cooperative banks disagrees
with this views.75% of NBFC sample survey agrees to the concept of
long standing relations to project viability 67% of private banks agrees
and 72% PSB agrees to relationship over project viability.
166
Part B_2
Political interference i.e. pressure to
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
29%
71%
NBFC
50%
50%
Private Bank
60%
40%
Public Sector
68%
32%
Cumulative Score
55%
45%
sanction loan
Analysis Reveals
Average of the cumulative score of 55% is of the views that there is
political interference for sanctioning the loan and 45% disagreed on this
issue. NBFC gave equal views regarding acceptance and non
acceptance from politicians where as 71% Cooperative banks disagreed
to the political interference and 60% of Private Banks and 68% of PSB
agreed to this views.
167
Part B_3
Political favouritism to particular
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
73%
27%
NBFC
75%
25%
Private Bank
53%
47%
Public Sector
80%
20%
Cumulative Score
71%
29%
Analysis Reveals
Average of 71% of the cumulative score of group under study has
agreed to existence of political favouritism to which 29% disagreed on
these
grounds.73%
favouritism
towards
Cooperative
the
banks
borrower
in
agreed
to
order
to
the
political
please
the
168
Part B_4
Delay in decision making in sanction of
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
87%
13%
NBFC
75%
25%
Private Bank
60%
40%
Public Sector
68%
32%
Cumulative Score
71%
29%
loan
Analysis Reveals
Majority of the group under the study agrees that delay in decision
making in sanction of a loan is a challenge. Cumulative score of 71%
agrees and 29% disagrees to the delay in decision making. 87% of
cooperative banks agree to this views.75% of Cooperative banks,60% of
the private sector, 68% of the PSB agrees to these views. Since there is
a delay in decision making due to indulgence of external and internal
factors there can be a fluctuation in the level of project submitted and
with the result the account may turn NPA. Maximum percentage of
disagreement shown is from Private banks.
169
Part B_5
Delay in disbursement in credit
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
73%
27%
NBFC
63%
37%
Private Bank
60%
40%
Public Sector
68%
32%
Cumulative Score
67%
33%
Analysis Reveals
Disbursement of finance at appropriate time is very essential as far as
any project is concerned. When opinions of the different banks within
the study group were conducted the analysis shows that cumulative
score of 67% agrees to the fact there is a delay in disbursement in
finance assistance.33% disagreed to the same. Only 40% private bank
had a major share in disagreeing the fact. Other banks have much less
than 40% disagreement under such circumstances strong disagreement
came from the private sector for delay in disbursement. 73% cooperative
banks 63%NBFC, 60% Private sector; PSB 68% respectively.
170
Part B_6
Disbursement of loan before the
compliance of terms and conditions
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
53%
47%
NBFC
50%
50%
Private Bank
60%
40%
Public Sector
76%
24%
Cumulative Score
63%
37%
of sanction
Analysis Reveals
Majority of the group agrees that Disbursement of loan before the
compliance exist and cumulative score of 63% agrees and 37%
disagrees to the fact of compliance of the loan account. NBFC has 50%50% views. exactly 50% agrees and 50% disagrees the same. Study
group which comprise of 25 PSB out of which 76% PSB agrees to the
disbursement of loan before the compliance of the terms and conditions
and out of 15 private sector banks 60% agrees to the compliance of the
terms and conditions only after the disbursement of loan. 53% of the
Cooperative banks from the study sample of 15 Urban Schedule Banks
171
Part B_7
Incomplete and defective legal
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
60%
40%
NBFC
63%
37%
Private Bank
40%
60%
Public Sector
84%
16%
Cumulative Score
65%
35%
documentation
Analysis Reveals
84% of the PSB under study group consisting of sample size of 25 banks
including SBI and its associates agrees to incomplete and defective legal
documentation. 63% NBFC out of 30 sample study group agrees to the
defective legal documentation and so also may not be complete.60% out
of the study sample of 15 Urban Schedule Co-operative Banks agrees to
172
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
13%
87%
NBFC
25%
75%
Private Bank
67%
33%
Public Sector
24%
76%
Cumulative Score
32%
68%
statements in time.
173
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative score of 68% of the group under study disagrees to the fact
that the audited financial statement is not available in time could be a
cause of NPA. Only 67% of private banks agree to the non availability of
the audited financial account 87% Cooperative banks, 75% NBFC and
76% PSB disagrees to the fact that non availability of the audited
financial statement is a cause of NPA. According to these banks
unaudited statement is not a cause of a factor where a loan becomes
bad or NPA.
Part C_2
Non-submission of stock and other
required periodical statements by the
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
27%
73%
NBFC
37%
63%
Private Bank
80%
20%
Public Sector
52%
48%
Cumulative Score
51%
49%
borrowers
174
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative score under the study group exhibits 51% agrees and 49%
disagrees to the fact that non submission of stock and other required
statement by the borrowers. 80% Private banks and 52% PSB agree to
the fact that due to non submission of stock and other required
statement by the borrowers where as 73% Cooperative banks and 63%
NBFC disagrees to the non submission of statement and other relevant
information.
Part C_3
Negligent approach by the bank officials in
regards to inspection of stock etc.
Agree Disagree
Co-operative Bank
53%
47%
NBFC
88%
12%
Private Bank
67%
33%
Public Sector
60%
40%
Cumulative Score
63%
37%
175
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative score of the group under the study shows that 63% agrees
at times there could be negligence on the bank officials to which 37%
disagrees. They opine that the officials approach is not negligent. 53%
cooperative banks,87% NBFC,67%Private Banks, 60% PSB agrees to the
fact that feels that one of the factors for an account becoming NPA
could be negligence of bank officials or Banks negligent approach.
Part C_4
Non-submission of stock and other
required periodical statements by the
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
27%
73%
NBFC
38%
62%
Private Bank
80%
20%
Public Sector
52%
48%
Cumulative Score
51%
49%
borrowers
176
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative score of group under the study 56% agrees regarding the
issue raised to the banks. The issues were with respect to non
submission of stock which 49% disagrees. 37% Co-operative banks,38%
NBFC and 80% PSB agrees to the fact that Cause of account becoming
bad could be due to absence of effective monitoring by the banks.48%
private banks disagrees to this issues raised to the study sample.
Part C_5
Absence of close supervision of loan
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
40%
60%
NBFC
50%
50%
Private Bank
67%
33%
Public Sector
52%
48%
Cumulative Score
52%
48%
account
177
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative score of the group under study shows 52% agreed for the
absence of close supervision of loan account.48% of the responses
disagreed for the same.60% Cooperative banks disagreed to the fact
that there is absence of close supervision amongst the banks. Similarly
NBFC agreed and disagreed equal in number. The 67% score of private
banks agrees to the absence of close supervision where as 52% PSB
also agrees to the fact like private banks that there is absence of close
supervision of all the accounts by the banks.
Part C_6
Delayed detection of warning signals
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
47%
53%
NBFC
50%
50%
Private Bank
93%
7%
Public Sector
52%
48%
Cumulative Score
60%
40%
178
Analysis Reveals
Study group is under the impression that there is still delayed detection
of warning signal.60% of the total sample survey conducted agrees to
this views to which total 40% disagrees to this views.93% of private
banks out of sample size of 15 accepts to this delayed detection of
warning signal. Only a small magnitude disagrees to the same. Whereas
52% of the PSB agrees to the delayed detection.
Part C_7
Delay in initiating remedial
Agree
Disagree
Co-operative Bank
60%
40%
NBFC
63%
37%
Private Bank
93%
7%
Public Sector
44%
56%
Cumulative Score
62%
38%
179
Analysis Reveals
62% cumulative score of the group under study agrees that delay in
initiating remedial measures and actions as to 38% of the score disagree
to the fact.
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
67%
33%
NBFC
75%
25%
Private Bank
100%
0%
Public Sector
87%
13%
Cumulative Score
82%
18%
180
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under the study shows that 82% agrees
to the compromise and settle to reduce the level of NPA in their bank to
which 18% were not in favour of compromise or one time settlement.
67% Co-operative banks agrees for compromise and settlement for
reducing the level of NPA. Similarly 75% of the NBFC sample study and
100% of private banks were in favour of settlement to reduce the level of
NPA to which 87% PSB agrees overall from the sample size as
mentioned above. PSB includes even SBI and its 7 associates
sec3_2
Can this method develop a tendency among bank
borrowers to make deliberate attempt of default
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
40%
60%
NBFC
75%
25%
Private Bank
80%
20%
Public Sector
65%
35%
Cumulative Score
62%
38%
181
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative score of the group under the study shows that 62% agrees
that compromise and settlement can be misused by the borrowers to
which 38% disagrees.80% response from private banks strongly agrees
so also 75% NBFC agrees and similarly 65% of PSB under study groups
agrees to the same.60% Cooperative banks under study group disagrees
to the views presented by other three groups that this settlement can be
misused by the borrowers.
sec3_3
What is your opinion about credit
monitoring system existing presently in
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
67%
33%
NBFC
50%
50%
Private Bank
80%
20%
Public Sector
61%
39%
Cumulative Score
64%
36%
182
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative score of the group under the study shows that 64% agrees
that the existing credit monitoring system is adequate to which 36%
disagrees. Private banks strongly agrees with 80% score whereas 67%
Cooperative banks agree to this fact that credit monitoring is adequate.
PSB with 61% agrees to the view that the existing system is adequate to
which
NBFC
shows
equal
opinion
regarding
agreement
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
80%
20%
NBFC
38%
62%
Private Bank
80%
20%
Public Sector
65%
35%
Cumulative Score
68%
32%
and
disagreement.
sec3_4
Do you feel that improvement in this
system is necessary?
183
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 68% feels there
is a need for improvement of the existing credit monitoring system to
which 32% of the study sample disagrees. Cooperative bank and private
bank with score of 80% each agrees that there is a need for
improvement and PSB with a score of 65% agrees for the need to
improve the system. NBFC with a score of 62% disagrees to the need for
improvement.
sec3_5
Do you feel that specialized cadre skilled officer be
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
53%
47%
NBFC
50%
50%
Private Bank
90%
10%
Public Sector
59%
41%
Cumulative Score
62%
38%
184
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 62% feels there
is a need for specialised and skilled officer to be selected for the credit
department to which 38% of the study sample disagrees. Cooperative
bank with 53% score agrees and private bank with score of 90% agrees
that there is a need for specialised and skilled officer to selected for the
credit department and PSB with a score of 59% agrees for the need for
specialized and skilled officer. NBFC with a score of 50% disagrees and
50% agrees for specialized and skilled officer in the credit department
sec3_6
Will this selection help bank to reduce the
risk of account becoming NPA in early
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
67%
33%
NBFC
62%
38%
Private Bank
80%
20%
Public Sector
70%
30%
Cumulative Score
70%
30%
185
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 70% feels there
is a need for specialised and skilled officer to be selected for the credit
department will reduce the level of NPA to which 30% of the study
sample disagrees. Cooperative bank with 67% score agrees and private
bank with score of 80% agrees that there is a need for specialised and
skilled officer to selected for the credit department with the result the
NPA percentage can be reduced and PSB with a score of 70% agrees for
the need for specialized and skilled officer to bring down the NPA
percentage. NBFC with a score of 62% agrees and 37% disagrees for
reduction in bad loans.
sec3_7
Whether there is a need of a special recovery
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
60%
40%
NBFC
75%
25%
Private Bank
20%
80%
Public Sector
78%
22%
Cumulative Score
62%
38%
186
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 62% feels there is
a need for special recovery officer to be selected for the credit
department will reduce the level of NPA to which 37% of the study sample
disagrees. Cooperative bank with 60% score agrees and private bank with
score of 80% disagrees that there is a need for special recovery officer to
selected for the credit department with the result the NPA percentage can
be reduced and PSB with a score of 78% agrees for the need for special
recovery officer to bring down the NPA percentage. NBFC with a score of
75% agrees and 25% disagrees for reduction in bad loans.
sec3_8
Do you favour appointments of External
Recovery Agents to recover banks hard
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
47%
53%
NBFC
75%
25%
Private Bank
80%
20%
Public Sector
83%
17%
Cumulative Score
71%
29%
core dues?
187
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 71% feels there
is a need for external recovery agent for collection of hard core dues to
reduce the level of NPA to which 29% of the study sample disagrees.
Cooperative bank with 47% score agrees and disagrees with 53% and
private bank with score of 80% agrees that there is a need for recovery
agent for collection of hard core dues to reduce the level of
NPA
percentage can be reduced and PSB with a score of 83% agrees for the
need for recovery agent for collection of dues to bring down the NPA
percentage. NBFC with a score of 75% agrees and 25% disagrees for
reduction in bad loans.
sec3_9
Do you favour cash incentive scheme for
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
47%
53%
NBFC
50%
50%
Private Bank
80%
20%
Public Sector
74%
26%
Cumulative Score
64%
36%
188
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 64% feels there
is a need for incentives to staff is good option and will reduce the level
of NPA to which 36% of the study sample disagrees. Cooperative bank
with 47% score agrees and private bank with score of 80% agrees that
there is a need for incentives to staff
percentage can be reduced and PSB with a score of 74% agrees for the
need for incentives to staff shall motivate them to work hard and bring
down the NPA percentage. NBFC with a score of 50% agrees and 50%
disagrees for reduction in bad loans
189
sec3_10
Whether
system
of
credit
audit
i.e.
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
53%
47%
NBFC
75%
25%
Private Bank
50%
50%
Public Sector
83%
17%
Cumulative Score
68%
32%
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 68% feels there
is a need for introducing a credit audit before disbursement is good
option and will reduce the level of NPA to which 32% of the study
sample disagrees. Cooperative bank with 53% score agrees and private
bank with score of 50% agrees that there is a need for introducing a
credit before disbursement and with the result the NPA percentage can
be reduced and PSB with a score of 83% agrees for the need for audit
190
before the disbursement to bring down the NPA percentage. NBFC with
a score of 75% agrees and 25% disagrees for reduction in bad loans.
sec3_11
Can this system be made compulsory/
statutory like or similar to internal audit
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
67%
33%
NBFC
100%
0%
Private Bank
40%
60%
Public Sector
70%
30%
Cumulative Score
68%
32%
in the bank?
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 68% feels there
is a need for introducing a credit audit before disbursement is good
option and should be made compulsory and will reduce the level of NPA
to which 32% of the study sample disagree. Cooperative bank with 67%
score agrees and private bank with score of 40% agrees and 60%
disagrees that there is a need for
191
result NPA percentage can be reduced and PSB with a score of 70%
agrees introducing a credit audit before disbursement is good option
down the NPA percentage. NBFC with a score of 100% agrees for
reduction in bad loans.
sec3_12
Whether the scope of separate Rating
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
67%
33%
NBFC
50%
50%
Private Bank
70%
30%
Public Sector
74%
26%
Cumulative Score
68%
32%
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 68% feels that
setting up a separate rating agency for risk rating is required to reduce
the level of NPA to which 32% of the study sample disagrees. Co-
192
operative bank with 67% score agrees and private bank with score of
70% agrees that there is a need for separate rating agency is with the
result the NPA percentage can be reduced and PSB with a score of 74%
agrees for the setting up a separate rating agency to bring down the
NPA percentage. NBFC with a score of 50% agrees and 50% disagrees
for reduction in bad loans.
sec3_13
Whether such risk rating system if introduced
should cover all the aspects of credit
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
87%
13%
NBFC
50%
50%
Private Bank
90%
10%
Public Sector
83%
17%
Cumulative Score
80%
20%
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 80% feels the
rating System should cover all items such as type of product, nature of
193
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
60%
40%
NBFC
63%
37%
Private Bank
90%
10%
Public Sector
96%
4%
Cumulative Score
77%
33%
194
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 80% agrees that
Management Information system on the performance of various sector
of Economy need to be developed to which 20% of the study sample
disagrees. Cooperative bank with 60% score agrees and private bank
with score of 90% agrees that there is a need for specialised
information system. PSB with a score of 96% agrees for the need for
specialized information system to bring down the NPA percentage.
NBFC with a score of 63% agrees and 37% disagrees for reduction in
bad loans.
sec3_15
Are you in favour of fixing of
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
64%
36%
NBFC
62%
38%
Private Bank
70%
30%
Public Sector
91%
9%
Cumulative Score
76%
24%
195
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 76% feels there
is a need for fixing of bank officials for an account to become NPA due
to their oversight or negligence etc. reduce the level of NPA to which
24% of the study sample disagrees. Cooperative bank with 64% score
agrees and private bank with score of 70 % agrees that there is a need
for fixing of bank officials with the result the NPA percentage can be
reduced and PSB with a score of 91% agrees for the need for
specialized and skilled officer to bring down the NPA percentage. NBFC
with a score of 62% agrees and 37% disagree for reduction in bad loans
sec3_16
Whether in your opinion strict
appraisal will help to reduce the
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
93%
7%
NBFC
75%
25%
Private Bank
90%
10%
Public Sector
91%
9%
Cumulative Score
89%
11%
196
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 89% feels that
concept of Strict appraisal will reduce the level of NPA to which 11% of
the study sample disagrees. Cooperative bank with 93 % score agrees
and private bank with score of 90% agrees that there is a need for strict
appraisal with the result the NPA percentage can be reduced and PSB
with a score of 91% agrees for the need for specialized and skilled
officer to bring down the NPA percentage. NBFC with a score of 75%
agrees and 25% disagrees for reduction in bad loans.
sec3_17
Whether this Strict Appraisal will become
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
73%
27%
NBFC
88%
12%
Private Bank
70%
30%
Public Sector
78%
22%
Cumulative Score
77%
23%
197
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 77% feels that
concept of Strict appraisal will become harassment to the borrowers
and will reduce the level of NPA to which 23% of the study sample
disagrees. Cooperative bank with 73% score agrees and private bank
with score of 70% agrees that for strict appraisal will become
harassment for the credit department and PSB with a score of 78%
agrees for the need for harassment to the borrowers. NBFC with a score
of 88% agrees and 12% disagrees
198
6.5. SECTION IV
sec4_1
It is often said that Lawyers/ advocates
delays the hearing of the case before Courts
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
60%
40%
NBFC
75%
25%
Private Bank
90%
10%
Public Sector
65%
35%
Cumulative Score
70%
30%
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 70% feels that
Lawyers or Advocate is the cause for adjournment which result in delay
in Justice to which 30% of the study sample disagrees. Cooperative
bank with 60 % score agrees and private bank with score of 90% agrees
that lawyers are the cause for the delay in court orders. and PSB with a
score of 65% agrees that advocate is the cause for the delay. NBFC with
a score of 75% agrees and 25% disagrees for the cause of delay.
199
sec4_2
Is it a fact that bank does not provide their
advocates with proper papers/ list of
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
47%
53%
NBFC
88%
12%
Private Bank
80%
20%
Public Sector
48%
52%
Cumulative Score
59%
41%
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 59% feels that
Incomplete documentation and securities delays the Justice and
completion of the court procedures to which 41% of the study sample
disagrees. Cooperative bank with 47% score agrees and private bank
with score of 80% agrees that insufficient papers or securities is a cause
for the delay in court orders and PSB with a score of 48% agrees that
improper documents pose problems to lawyers to get orders. NBFC with
a score of 88% agrees and 12% disagrees for the cause of delay.
200
sec4_3
Is it true that most of the bankers do not
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
40%
60%
NBFC
50%
50%
Private Bank
70%
30%
Public Sector
61%
39%
Cumulative Score
55%
45%
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 55% feels that
Renewal of documentation lacks and delays the Justice and completion
Of the court procedures to which 45% of the study sample disagrees.
Cooperative bank with 40% score agrees and private bank with score of
80% agrees that non renewal or delayed renewal is a cause for the delay
in court orders and PSB with a score of 61% agrees the same. NBFC
with a score of 50% agrees and 50% disagrees for the cause of delay.
201
sec4_4
Do you feel that delay in getting decree
from court to recover banks dues make
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
60%
40%
NBFC
25%
75%
Private Bank
40%
60%
Public Sector
61%
39%
Cumulative Score
52%
48%
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 52% feels that
delay in getting decree from the court to recover dues makes recovery
impossible or difficult to which 48% of the study sample disagrees.
Cooperative bank with 60% score agrees and private bank with score of
40% agrees that delay in getting decree is one of the cause for the delay
in recovery procedures and PSB with a score of 61% agrees the same.
NBFC with a score of 25% agree and 75% disagrees for the cause of
delay.
202
sec4_5
Do you agree that time consuming and
tedious legal procedure is responsible for
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
67%
33%
NBFC
75%
25%
Private Bank
70%
30%
Public Sector
65%
35%
Cumulative Score
68%
32%
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 68% feels that
lengthy and tedious procedures are the cause for delay in recovery of
the dues. to which 32% of the study sample disagrees. Cooperative bank
with 67% score agrees and private bank with score of 70% agrees that
delay in recovery of the dues is one of the cause for the delay in
recovery procedures and PSB with a score of 65% agrees the same.
NBFC with a score of 75% agree and 25% disagrees for the cause of
delay.
203
sec4_6
Do you agree that outdated laws are the major
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
67%
33%
NBFC
100%
0%
Private Bank
80%
20%
Public Sector
87%
13%
Cumulative Score
82%
18%
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 82% feels that
amendment of laws are required to be made often so that recovery
procedures can be made faster to which 18% of the study sample
disagrees. Cooperative bank with 67% score agrees and private bank
with score of 80% agrees that amendment need to be made quite often to
keep pace with the current scenario. PSB with a score of 87% agrees the
same. NBFC with a score of 100% agree for the cause of delay to be
outdated laws.
204
sec4_7
Do you feel that effective working of Board
for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
60%
40%
NBFC
62%
38%
Private Bank
90%
10%
Public Sector
87%
13%
Cumulative Score
77%
23%
Analysis Reveals
Cumulative Score of the group under study shows that 77% feels that
effective functioning of BIFR will enable the banks to recover long
outstanding dues to which 23% of the study sample disagrees.
Cooperative bank with 60% score agrees and private bank with score of
90% agrees that effective functioning of BIFR will reduce the NPA
level.PSB with a score of 87% agrees the same. NBFC with a score of
62% agree for the reduction of NPA and recovery of dues.
205
sec4_8
Do you feel that the Public Debt Recovery
Act (DRT) be extended or made applicable
YES
NO
Co-operative Bank
93%
7%
NBFC
75%
25%
Private Bank
70%
30%
Public Sector
83%
17%
Cumulative Score
82%
18%
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have almost similar views. 80% borrowers
agree that DRT should work more effectively and should be extended to
wider jurisdiction . 86% facilitators opinion shows recovery of due is
possible with efficient functioning and wider coverage of jurisdiction. 82
% banks are also of the same opinion as borrowers and facilitators to
which 20% borrowers, 14% facilitators and 18% banks disagree with the
view efficiency DRT and DRAT.
206
Sec4_9 is an open end question. The question asked was regarding the
reason for considerable delay in getting the decree from the court for
banks dues. Since it is an open end question with three reasons for the
delay the opinion is considered for findings and recommendations
chapter. It is not presented by graphical representation.
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
90%
10%
Facilitator
90%
10%
BANK
78%
22%
207
Analysis Reveals
Borrowers and facilitators have similar stand point as 90% agrees and
10% disagrees. Banks has slight difference where 78% agrees and 22%
disagrees to this views.
Part A_2
Deliberate attempt of loose appraisal
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
90%
10%
Facilitator
80%
20%
BANK
73%
27%
Analysis Reveals
Majority of the group in the study agrees that there is a deliberate
attempt of loose appraisal. 73% banks strongly agree to this factor and
27% of the bank strongly disagrees to this factor. The analysis shows
that the banker is unable to get the clear idea about the borrowers
business and their intention. 80% 0f the facilitator and 90% of the
borrowers also agree along with the banks.
208
Part A_3
Submission of unrealistic project by
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
70%
30%
Facilitator
71%
29%
BANK
62%
38%
the borrower
Analysis Reveals
Majority of the group in the study agrees that there is submission of
unrealistic Project report by the borrowers. 62% banks strongly agree to
this factor and 38% of the bank strongly disagrees to this factor. The
analysis shows that the banker is unable to get the clear idea about the
borrowers business and their intention. 71% 0f the facilitator and 70% of
the borrowers also agree along with the banks.
209
Part A_4
Preparation of incorrect loan repayment
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
60%
40%
Facilitator
45%
55%
BANK
38%
62%
schedule
Analysis Reveals
Borrowers have very different opinion about the repayment plan.60%
borrowers agrees to this statement and 40% disagree to this
opinion.62% banks disagree to which 48% agree to this views.45%
facilitators agree to the defective repayment schedule and 65% disagree
to default in repayment structure.
210
Part A_5
Incorporation of improper assessment of
experience of the borrower or his capacity
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
60%
40%
Facilitator
65%
35%
BANK
65%
35%
Analysis Reveals
All the three groups in the study has almost same stand bearing a
marginal difference. Opinion of the banks and the facilitators were
identical regarding improper assessment or their capacity to pursue the
business activity.65% each banks and facilitators agreed to this factor of
assessment.60% of the Borrowers agreed to improper assessment.
211
Part A_6
Non-Availability of reliable market
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
60%
40%
Facilitator
63%
37%
BANK
52%
48%
Analysis Reveal
Market study to the credit officers.60% of the borrowers agrees to this
fact and 40% disagrees to this statement where as 63% of the facilitators
and 52% of the banks revealed their consent to agree 37% facilitators
and 48% banks disagrees with the non availability of credit officer
Part A_7
Non-Availability of Industry wise data on
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
50%
50%
Facilitator
71%
29%
BANK
59%
41%
212
Analysis Reveals
The entire group in the study has different views pertaining to non
availability of industry wise data on demand and supply to the Credit
officer. Borrowers have equal opinion on non availability of data.50%
borrowers agrees and 50% disagrees. 71% facilitators agree to this
views and 29% disagrees.59% opine that there is no proper information
to the credit officers.
Part A_8
Reliance on provisional/ unaudited
data as submitted by the borrower to
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
65%
35%
Facilitator
65%
35%
BANK
67%
33%
Bank.
213
Analysis Reveals
The entire group in the study has different views reliability on the
provisions of the unaudited accounts. Borrowers and Facilitators have
similar views. 65% borrowers and 65% facilitators were having their
identical opinion borrower agrees and 50% disagrees. 67% facilitators
agree to this views and 29% disagrees.59% opine that there is no proper
information to the credit officers.
Part A_9
Lack of network/ information system
amongst branches/ banks enabling
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
75%
25%
Facilitator
80%
20%
BANK
78%
22%
214
Analysis Reveals
All the group in the study has almost similar stand point.75% of
borrowers agree there is lack of network/information system amongst
banks enabling borrowers to enjoying bank funds from more than one
bank and 80% facilitators have similar views.78% banks from the sample
selected agree to the multiple borrowing and 22% disagree to the
prevailing multiple borrowing.
Part A_10
Lack of confidence in credit
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
50%
50%
Facilitator
36%
64%
BANK
30%
70%
officers
215
Analysis Reveals
All the group in the study has different stand point.50% of borrowers
agree there is lack of confidence in the credit officers and 36%
facilitators agree to this views and 64% disagree regarding the
confidence level of the credit officer.30 % banks from the sample
selected agree to the lack of confidence level on the credit officer and
60% disagree to the issues on lack of confidence in their bank
employees
Part A_11
Lack of knowledge in the subject to
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
50%
50%
Facilitator
37%
63%
BANK
30%
70%
credit officer
216
Analysis Reveals
All the group in the study has different stand point.50% of borrowers
agree there is lack of knowledge in the subject to the credit officers and
37% facilitators agree to this views and 63% disagree regarding the level
of knowledge in the subject to the credit officer.30 % banks from the
sample selected agree to the lack of knowledge in the subject to the
credit officer and 70% disagree to the issues on lack of knowledge in
their bank employees.
Part A_12
Lack of Economic Study on the Production
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
55%
45%
Facilitator
55%
45%
BANK
56%
44%
217
Analysis Reveals
All the group in the study has same stand point.55% of borrowers agree
there is lack of Economic Study on the Production activity of the
proposed borrower and 55% facilitators agree to this views and 45%
disagree regarding the lack of Economic Study on the Production
activity of the proposed borrower.56 % banks from the sample selected
agree to the lack of knowledge in the production activity and 44%
disagree to the issues on lack of knowledge in the borrowers activity.
Part A_13
Fear of staff accountability on account
turning NPA in future in the mind of
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
70%
30%
Facilitator
55%
45%
BANK
65%
35%
218
Analysis Reveals
All the group in the study has different stand point.70% of borrowers
agree there is fear of staff accountability on account turning NPA in
future in the minds of the credit officer and 55% facilitators agree to this
views and 45% disagree regarding the accountability on account turning
NPA.65 % banks from the sample selected agree to the staff
accountability on account turning NPA and 44% disagree to the issues
on lack of knowledge in the borrowers activity.
Part A_14
Absence of right to select good
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
85%
15%
Facilitator
49%
51%
BANK
56%
44%
219
Analysis Reveals
The entire group in the study has different stand point.85 % of borrowers
strongly agree that the credit department does not have any option to
select by the credit department. And 49% facilitators agree to these
views and 51% disagree regarding the non availability of option to
choose the borrower by the credit department.56 % banks from the
sample selected agree to the non availability of the option by the credit
department 44% disagree. Banks response is very distinct from that of
the borrower.
Part A_15
Non-availability of skilled/ trained staff in
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
55%
45%
Facilitator
55%
45%
BANK
40%
60%
credit department
220
Analysis Reveals
Bank responded 60% against the views of non availability of skilled and
trained staff and only 40% accepted it. Similarly Borrowers opinion and
Facilitators opinion were very similar and 55% agreed to the fact due to
lack of trained and skilled staff were as 45% failed to disagree this issue.
Part A_16
Fraudulent approach of borrowers
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
55%
45%
Facilitator
67%
33%
Bank
48%
52%
221
Analysis Reveals
Average of the study group reveals that 55% of the borrowers admit that
NPA is due to fraudulent approach adopted by the borrowers High
percentage of facilitator is of the opinion that NPA is due to fraud
committed by the borrower. High percentage precisely means 67% of
the facilitator opines this issue. Similarly 48% bank is under the opinion
that fraudulent act of the borrower is one of the causes for NPA in
banking industry.
Part A_17
Fraudulent
and
irresponsible
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
55%
45%
Facilitator
67%
33%
Bank
59%
41%
222
Analysis Reveals
Average of the study group shows 60% response agrees to the
fraudulent and irresponsible attitude of the bank official.55 % of
borrowers strongly agree that there is a fraudulent and irresponsible
attitude of the bank official and 67% facilitators agree to this views and
33% disagree regarding the fraudulent act of the bank official.59% banks
from the sample selected agree to the fraudulent act of the bank official
and 41% disagree.
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
40%
60%
Facilitator
67%
33%
BANK
62%
38%
223
Analysis Reveals
Borrowers and facilitators have similar stand point as 90% agrees and
10% disagrees. Banks has slight difference where 78% agrees and 22%
disagrees to this views.
Part B_2
Political interference i.e. pressure to
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
30%
70%
Facilitator
61%
39%
BANK
55%
45%
sanction loan
Analysis Reveals
30 % of borrowers feel that there is a political interference and 70%
disagree to this concept. Banks and facilitators possess similar opinion
61% and 55% agree to this views and 39 % disagree regarding political
interfearance.39 % and 45%facilitators and banks disagree with this
opinion.
224
Part B_3
Political favouritism to particular borrower
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
45%
55%
Facilitator
63%
37%
BANK
71%
29%
Analysis Reveals
45 % of borrowers feel that there is a political favouritism to the
borrowers in order to please the politicians and 55% disagree to this
concept. Banks and facilitators possess similar opinion 71% and 63%
agree
to
this
views
and
29
disagree
regarding
political
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
55%
45%
Facilitator
76%
24%
BANK
71%
29%
sanction of loan
225
Analysis Reveals
55 % of borrowers feel that there is a delay in decision making with the
result the project and the business could be termed old and out of
fashion. And 45% disagree to this concept.
possess similar opinion 71% and 76% agree to this views and 29 %
disagree regarding political interference. 24 % and banks disagree with
this opinion.
Part B_5
Delay in disbursement in credit
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
58%
42%
Facilitator
64%
36%
BANK
67%
33%
226
Analysis Reveals
8 % of borrowers feel that there is a delay in disbursement in credit
facility i.e. untimely finance can be a factor for an account becoming
NPA because when there is a delay the project viability may become
obsolete and out dated. With the result the project and the business
could be termed old and out of fashion and 42% disagree to this
concept. Banks and facilitators possess similar opinion 67% and 64%
agree to this views and 33% banks disagree regarding political
interference 36 % facilitator disagree with this opinion.
Part B_6
Disbursement of loan before the
compliance of terms and conditions of
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
50%
50%
Facilitator
69%
31%
BANK
63%
37%
sanction
227
Analysis Reveals
Borrowers have 50-50 stand in terms of instances where the loans are
Disbursed Even before the compliance of terms and conditions of
sanction. 50% disagree to this concept. 63% Banks and 69% facilitators
possess similar opinion and 37% banks and 31% facilitators disagree
regarding disbursement before fulfilling the conditions. Disbursement
the means the loan sanctioning should be kept ready at the time of final
signature and loan should be immediately disbursed
Part B_7
Incomplete and defective legal
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
55%
45%
Facilitator
65%
35%
BANK
65%
35%
documentation
228
Analysis Reveals
55 % of borrowers feel that there is a defective and incomplete legal
documentation and 45% borrower disagree to this concept. Banks and
facilitators possess similar opinion 65 % each possess the similar
views. 35% of both facilitators as well as banks disagree that there are
instances where incomplete and defective legal documentation are
presented for the purpose of sanctioning loan.
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
30%
70%
Facilitator
33%
67%
BANK
32%
68%
statements in time.
229
Analysis Reveals
All the three groups share similar views.
the problem of
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
35%
65%
Facilitator
43%
57%
BANK
51%
49%
the borrowers
230
Analysis Reveals
All the three groups have distinct response to this statement. A concern
for the 35% borrowers had the opinion that non submission of
statement of stock and other required periodical statements by the
borrower be the cause for NPA. 43% facilitators opined that non
submission of statement of stock and other relevant document can be
the problem of NPA.51 % banks are also of the same opinion as
borrowers and facilitators to which 65% borrowers, 57% facilitators and
49% banks disagreed to the concept of compromise and settlement.
Part C_3
Negligent approach by the bank officials in
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
50%
50%
Facilitator
55%
45%
BANK
63%
37%
231
Analysis Reveals
All the three groups have distinct response to this statement. A concern
for the 50% borrowers had the opinion that negligent approach by the
bank officials in regard to inspection of stock can be the cause for NPA.
55% facilitators opined that negligent approach by the officer in-charge
can be the problem of NPA.63 % banks are also of the same opinion as
borrowers and facilitators to which 50% borrowers, 45% facilitators and
37% banks disagreed to the concept of compromise and settlement.
Part C_4
Absence of effective monitoring
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
60%
40%
Facilitator
53%
47%
BANK
56%
44%
232
Analysis Reveals
All the three groups have similar response for absence of effective
monitoring. 60% borrowers had the opinion that absence of effective
monitoring by the bank officials in regard can be the cause for NPA.
53% facilitators opined that absence of strong monitoring approach by
the officer in-charge can be the problem of NPA.56 % banks are also of
the same opinion as borrowers and facilitators to which 40% borrowers,
47% facilitators and 44% banks disagreed to the concept of lack of
effective monitoring by the bank officials.
Part C_5
Absence of close supervision of loan
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
60%
40%
Facilitator
51%
49%
BANK
52%
48%
account
233
Analysis Reveals
All the three groups have different response for absence of close
supervision of loan account. Opinion between facilitator and banks are
close knit. 60% borrowers had the opinion that absence of effective
supervision by the bank officials in regard can be the cause for NPA.
51% facilitators opined that absence of strong monitoring approach by
the officer in-charge can be the problem of NPA.52 % banks are also of
the same opinion as borrowers and facilitators to which 40% borrowers,
49% facilitators and 48% banks disagreed to the concept of lack of
effective supervision of the loan account.
Part C_6
Delayed detection of warning signals
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
65%
35%
Facilitator
76%
24%
BANK
60%
40%
234
Analysis Reveals
Bank and the borrower has almost similar approach.60% borrowers had
the opinion that delayed detection of warning signal can be the cause
for NPA. 51% facilitators agrees that delayed detection of warning signal
can be the source for the loan account becoming NPA.52 % banks are
also of the same opinion as borrowers and facilitators to which 40%
borrowers, 49% facilitators and 48% banks disagreed to the concept of
delayed detection of warning signal is bad.
Part C_7
Delay in initiating remedial
Agree
Disagree
Borrower
65%
35%
Facilitator
78%
22%
BANK
62%
38%
235
Analysis Reveals
63% agrees that there is delay in initiating remedial measures and
actions wherein 37% differed in their approach. Opinion between
borrowers and banks are close knit. 65% borrowers had the opinion that
there is a delay in initiating remedial measures by the officials can be
the cause for NPA. 78% facilitators opined that absence of initiative by
the bank officer for remedial measures can be the problem of NPA.62 %
banks are also of the same opinion as borrowers to which 35%
borrowers, 22% facilitators and 38% banks disagreed to the concept of
delay in remedial measures.
SECTION III
sec3_1
YES
NO
Borrower
85%
15%
Facilitator
80%
20%
BANK
82%
18%
236
Analysis Reveals
Banks borrowers and facilitator have slightly similar opinion. Approach
made by borrowers, facilitators and banks are close knit. 85% borrowers
had the opinion that compromise and settlement can be the cause for
NPA. 80% facilitators opined that one time settlement and compromise
by the borrowers to the bank official can reduce the problem of NPA.82
% banks are also of the same opinion as borrowers and facilitators to
which 15% borrowers, 20% facilitators and 18% banks disagreed to the
concept of compromise and settlement with the borrowers.
sec3_2
Can this method develop a tendency
among bank borrowers to make deliberate
YES
NO
Borrower
70%
30%
Facilitator
69%
31%
BANK
62%
38%
237
Analysis Reveals
Banks borrowers and facilitator have slightly similar opinion. Approach
made by borrowers, facilitators and banks are close knit.62% across the
group agrees that borrower may misuses the compromise options. 70%
borrowers had the opinion that compromise and settlement can be
misappropriated and the borrowers may ask for concession or waiver of
interest is a concern and can be the cause for NPA. 69% facilitators
opined that settlement of loan amount by means of compromise by the
borrowers to the bank official can be the problem of NPA. 63% banks
are also of the same opinion as borrowers and facilitators to which 30%
borrowers, 31% facilitators and 38% banks disagreed to the concept of
compromise and settlement can be misused by the borrower by not
making payment deliberately and subsequently asking for relief in the
interest rate.
238
sec3_3
What is your opinion about credit
monitoring system existing presently in
YES
NO
Borrower
70%
30%
Facilitator
55%
45%
BANK
64%
36%
Analysis Reveals
Banks borrowers and facilitator have slightly different opinion. 70%
borrowers had the opinion that inadequate monitoring of credit on loan
account can be the cause for NPA. 55% facilitators opined that credit
monitoring by banks in India is not appropriate should be improved by
the banks to reduce the problem of NPA.64 % banks are also of the
same opinion as borrowers and facilitators to which 30% borrowers,
45% facilitators and 36% banks disagreed to the concept of inadequate
credit monitoring by banks in India.
239
sec3_4
YES
NO
Borrower
45%
55%
Facilitator
64%
36%
BANK
68%
32%
is necessary?
Analysis Reveals
Banks borrowers and facilitator have slightly different opinion. 45%
borrowers had the opinion that improvement in the system can reduce
the level of NPA. 64% facilitators opined that system is in adequate and
improvement need to be made to reduce the level of NPA.68 % banks
are also of the same opinion as borrowers and facilitators to which 55%
borrowers, 36% facilitators and 32% banks disagreed to the concept of
inadequate credit monitoring system in India.
240
sec3_5
Do you feel that specialized cadre skilled
officer be selected and posted in credit
YES
NO
Borrower
70%
30%
Facilitator
67%
33%
BANK
62%
38%
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have similar views. 66% average across
the group agrees that specialised and skilled officer can definitely
contribute well. 60% borrowers had the opinion that skilled and efficient
credit officer can reduce the level of NPA. 76% facilitators opined that
efficiency of credit department need to be increased by appointing
skilled officer to reduce the level of NPA.70 % banks are also of the
same opinion as borrowers and facilitators to which 30% borrowers,
241
33% facilitators and 38% banks disagreed to the fact that skilled and
efficient officers appointment shall reduce the level of NPA.
sec3_6
Will this selection help bank to reduce
the risk of account becoming NPA in
YES
NO
Borrower
60%
40%
Facilitator
76%
24%
BANK
70%
30%
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have marginal difference in their views.
60% borrowers had the opinion that selection of skilled and efficient
credit officer can reduce the level of NPA in early stage or in future. 76%
facilitators opined that efficiency of credit department need to be
increased by appointing skilled officer to reduce the level of NPA and
possible to be deducted at early stage itself.70 % banks are also of the
same opinion as borrowers and facilitators to which 40% borrowers,
242
24% facilitators and 30% banks disagreed to the fact that skilled and
efficient officers appointment shall reduce the level of NPA neither at
early stage nor in future.
sec3_7
Whether there is a need of a special
recovery officer in bank for better
YES
NO
Borrower
75%
25%
Facilitator
59%
41%
BANK
62%
38%
recovery?
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have marginal similarities in their views.
75% borrowers had the opinion that selection of recovery officer can
reduce the level of NPA in early stage or in future. 59% facilitators
opined that efficiency of credit department need to be increased by
appointing recovery officer to recover the dues efficiently which in turn
243
will reduce the level of NPA and possible to be deducted at early stage
itself.62% banks are also of the same opinion as borrowers and
facilitators to which 25% borrowers, 41% facilitators and 38% banks
disagreed to the fact that appointment of recovery officer shall not make
any difference in the performance of the banks.
sec3_8
Do you favour appointments of External
Recovery Agents to recover banks hard
YES
NO
Borrower
60%
40%
Facilitator
63%
37%
BANK
71%
29%
core dues?
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have marginal similarities in their views.
60% borrowers agree for appointment of external recovery agency for
hard core due which enable to reduce the level of NPA in early stage or
in future. 63% facilitators opined that appointment of recovery agent can
244
YES
NO
Borrower
60%
40%
Facilitator
55%
45%
BANK
64%
36%
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have marginal similarities in their views.
60% borrowers agree for cash incentives for recovery of hard core due
245
which enable to reduce the level of NPA in early stage or in future. 55%
facilitators opined that cash incentives can motivate the staff and can
produce better performance to recover the dues efficiently which in turn
will reduce the level of NPA and possible to be deducted at early stage
itself.64 % banks are also of the same opinion as borrowers and
facilitators to which 40% borrowers, 45% facilitators and 36% banks
disagreed to the fact that cash incentives shall not make any difference
in the performance of the banks or recovery status of the bank.
sec3_10
Whether a system of credit audit i.e.
verification of total proposal financially and
YES
NO
Borrower
45%
55%
Facilitator
65%
35%
BANK
68%
32%
246
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have difference in their views. 60%
borrowers agree with the concept of credit audit. Credit audit should be
conducted before the disbursement of the loan amount. 55% facilitators
opined that performance of credit audit at appraisal or disbursement
stage will enable to eliminate the sanction of defective loan account
which in turn will reduce the level of NPA and possible to be deducted
at early stage itself.64 % banks are also of the same opinion as
borrowers and facilitators to which 40% borrowers, 45% facilitators and
36% banks disagreed to the fact that there could be any difference in the
performance of the bank due to credit audit.
sec3_11
Can this system be made compulsory/
statutory like or similar to internal audit in
YES
NO
Borrower
60%
40%
Facilitator
71%
29%
BANK
68%
32%
the bank?
247
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have difference in their views. 60%
borrowers agree with the concept of credit audit. and also agreed that it
should be made as a statutory requirement for better recovery
proceedings.71% facilitators opined that performance of credit audit at
appraisal or disbursement stage will enable to eliminate the sanction of
defective loan account which in turn will reduce the level of NPA and
possible to be deducted at early stage itself. 68 % banks are also of the
same opinion as borrowers and facilitators to which 40% borrowers,
29% facilitators and 32% banks disagreed to the fact that there could be
any difference in the performance of the bank Inspite of making credit
audit as statutory requirement.
sec3_12
Whether the scope of separate Rating
Agencies like ICRA, CRISIL, CARE etc. are
extended for the purpose of giving risk
YES
NO
Borrower
60%
40%
Facilitator
74%
26%
BANK
68%
32%
248
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have difference in their views. 60%
borrowers agree with separate credit agencies for credit audit.74%
facilitators opined that performance of credit agencies at appraisal or
disbursement stage will enable to eliminate the sanction of defective
loan account which in turn will reduce the level of NPA and possible to
be deducted at early stage itself. 68 % banks are also of the same
opinion as borrowers and facilitators to which 40% borrowers, 26%
facilitators and 32% banks disagreed to the fact that there could be no
difference it the success of the bank
sec3_13
Whether such risk rating system if introduced
should cover all the aspects of credit proposal
such as type of product, nature of industries,
YES
NO
Borrower
50%
50%
Facilitator
73%
27%
BANK
80%
20%
249
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have difference in their views. 50%
borrowers agree to the audit and rating system to cover all the factors
73% facilitators opined that performance of credit rating by agencies at
appraisal or disbursement stage will enable to reduce the level of NPA
and banks are also of the same opinion as borrowers and facilitators to
which 50% borrowers, 27% facilitators and 20% banks disagreed to the
fact that there could be no difference to the success
sec3_14
YES
NO
Borrower
45%
55%
Facilitator
80%
20%
BANK
80%
20%
250
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have difference in their views. 45%
borrowers agree to the concept of Management Information System on
the various sectors of the economy for better credit appraisal.80 %
facilitators opined that MIS and information system will be helpful in
increasing the performance of the bank. 80% banks are also of the same
opinion as borrowers and facilitators to which 55% borrowers, 20%
facilitators and 20% banks disagreed to the fact that there could be no
difference to the success
sec3_15
Are you in favour of fixing of responsible on
bank officials when particular accounts turn
YES
NO
Borrower
75%
25%
Facilitator
82%
18%
BANK
76%
24%
NPA?
251
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have difference in their views. 75%
borrowers agree to the concept of fixing the responsibility on the bank
officials in case of account turning NPA .82 % facilitators opined that
responsibility to hold bank officer or officials more vigilant. 76% banks
are also of the same opinion as borrowers and facilitators to which 25%
borrowers, 18% facilitators and 24% banks disagreed to the fact that
there could be no difference shall be made in case the officials are held
responsible.
sec3_16
Whether in your opinion strict appraisal
will help to reduce the chances of any
YES
NO
Borrower
75%
25%
Facilitator
88%
12%
BANK
89%
11%
252
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have slightly similar views. 75% borrowers
agree to the concept that strict appraisal can reduce the account turning
NPA. 88% facilitators opinion shows that having 89% banks are also of
the same opinion as borrowers and facilitators to which 25% borrowers,
12% facilitators and 11% banks disagreed to the fact that there should
be strict appraisal to reduce the level of NPA.
sec3_17
YES
NO
Borrower
85%
15%
Facilitator
56%
44%
BANK
77%
23%
253
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have slightly similar views. 75% borrowers
agree to that strict appraisal being a kind of harassment can reduce the
account turning NPA. 88% facilitators opinion shows that strict
appraisal can be a source of harassment to the borrowers. 89% banks
are also of the same opinion as borrowers and facilitators to which 25%
borrowers, 12% facilitators and 11% banks disagreed to the fact that
strict appraisal shall be a cause of harassment to the borrowers.
SECTION IV
sec4_1
It is often said that Lawyers/ advocates
delays the hearing of the case before Courts
YES
NO
Borrower
80%
20%
Facilitator
73%
27%
BANK
70%
30%
254
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have slightly similar views. 80% borrowers
agree that due to delay attitude of the advocates or lawyers by taking
adjournment the justice is postponed indefinitely. 73% facilitators
opinion shows that the court order is delayed due adjournment opted by
advocates or lawyers.70% banks are also of the same opinion as
borrowers and facilitators to which 20% borrowers, 27% facilitators and
30% banks disagreed to the fact that advocates or lawyers are the cause
for delayed court order.
sec4_2
Is it a fact that bank does not provide their
advocates with proper papers/ list of
YES
NO
Borrower
65%
35%
Facilitator
61%
39%
BANK
59%
41%
255
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have slightly similar views. 65% borrowers
agree that banks do provide advocates or lawyers with complete and
proper document during hearing of the case before the court. 61%
facilitators opinion shows that the court order is delayed due to
improper documentation or papers at the time of court hearing.59 %
banks are also of the same opinion as borrowers and facilitators to
which 20% borrowers, 27% facilitators and 30% banks disagreed to the
fact that advocates or lawyers are not provided with required
documents or incomplete papers during the court proceedings.
sec4_3
Is it true that most of the bankers do not
YES
NO
Borrower
60%
40%
Facilitator
55%
45%
BANK
55%
45%
256
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have slightly similar views. 60% borrowers
agree that banks do not renew the loan account from time to time.55%
facilitators opinion shows that non renewal of loan account and
upgradation of document is a cause of NPA.55 % banks are also of the
same opinion as borrowers and facilitators to which 40% borrowers,
45% facilitators and 45% banks disagreed that non renewal of the loan
account is no barriers for the success of the bank.
sec4_4
Do you feel that delay in getting decree
from court to recover banks dues make
YES
NO
Borrower
65%
35%
Facilitator
55%
45%
BANK
52%
48%
257
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have different views. 65% borrowers agree
that delay in getting the decree creates recovery of loan amount difficult
or impossible.55% facilitators opinion shows that delay in court order
leads to impossibility or difficult in recovering due from the borrowers.
.52 % banks are also of the same opinion as borrowers and facilitators to
which 35% borrowers, 55% facilitators and 48% banks disagreed that
delay in decree is a concern for recovery.
sec4_5
Do you agree that time consuming and
tedious legal procedure is responsible for
YES
NO
Borrower
60%
40%
Facilitator
68%
32%
BANK
68%
32%
258
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have identical views. 60% borrowers agree
that tedious and time consuming legal procedure are one of the factors
for
account
turning
NPA.68%
facilitators
opinion
shows
that
YES
NO
Borrower
40%
60%
Facilitator
67%
33%
BANK
82%
18%
259
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have different views. 40% borrowers agree
that out dated laws need to be amended at a lucid intervals.67%
facilitators opinion shows that old and outdated laws need to be
amended..82 % banks are also of the same opinion as borrowers and
facilitators to which 60% borrowers, 33% facilitators and 18% banks
disagreed that regarding outdated laws.
sec4_7
Do you feel that effective working of Board for
Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR)
YES
NO
Borrower
60%
40%
Facilitator
76%
24%
BANK
77%
23%
260
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have different views. 60% borrowers agree
effective working of BIFR will enable bank to recover long outstanding
dues. 76% facilitators opinion shows BIFR should function more
effectively to enable recovery faster. . 77 % banks are also of the same
opinion as borrowers and facilitators to which 40% borrowers, 24%
facilitators and 23% banks disagree with the efficiency of BIFR.
sec4_8
Do you feel that the Public Debt Recovery Act
(DRT) be extended or made applicable in all the
YES
NO
Borrower
80%
20%
Facilitator
86%
14%
BANK
82%
18%
261
Analysis Reveals
All three groups in the study have almost similar views. 80% borrowers
agree that DRT should work more effectively and should be extended to
wider jurisdiction. 86% facilitators opinion shows recovery of due is
possible with efficient functioning and wider coverage of jurisdiction. 82
% banks are also of the same opinion as borrowers and facilitators to
which 20% borrowers, 14% facilitators and 18% banks disagree with the
view efficiency DRT and DRAT.
6.7. Conclusions
In this chapter the analysis have been carried out in two parts:
Comparison between the banks (PSB, Private Banks, Co-operative
Banks and NBFC)
Comparisons between the Borrowers, Facilitators and Banks.
262
In both the comparison the analysis has been classified into three stages
and four sections. In section II there are open end questions which are
considered for findings and conclusions in chapter no 8 and 9 in this
research thesis. The views of respondents are taken for the suggestion
they are not exhibited in the graphical representations. All close end
questions are presented in graphical representation.
Unstructured interviews conducted with bank officials are also projected
in chapter no. 7 and 8 in the following chapters in this thesis. The
policies practised by the banks have been presented in this chapter
which gives clear idea as to what percentage of response from the banks
have been received and what is their opinions available and the
implementations of policies by a particular sectors.
263
CHAPTER 7
MANAGEMENT OF NPAs IN PRIORITY AND NON PRIORITY SECTOR
ADVANCES OF BANKS
7.1 Introduction
Priority sector was regarded as a Peoples Sector by the policy
makers, regulators and banks till 1990. As stated earlier, during 19691991, institutional viability was neglected, risk management practices
missing, credit provided under concessional interests rates and loans
were wrongly allocated. Combining all these factors resulted in decline
in profit margins and increased over dues. The NC-I tried to correct
these weaknesses by introducing the priority sector credit targets from
40-10 percent. The GoI did not accept this recommendation. In Indian
economy feels that the high level of the NPAs and low productivity of
capital that the economy had in the late 1980s and early 1990s was
caused by directed credit. Government of India and the RBI have not
denied this views directly, but attempted to mitigate the risks by
reforming priority sector credit by widening/ expanding the scope,
definition and liberalized interests rates, etc.
7.1. a. Findings of the Studies/Reports
The main factors responsible for increasing NPAs in priority sector
advances as reported by studies conducted by the PSBs were: poor
management and failure to detect the causes of incipient sickness; lack
of management capability of the borrowers; absence of regular visits to
units by the branch staff to monitor the operations; and lack of proper
infrastructure in the areas. Some of the reports and studies on NPAs
264
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
265
266
02-03
03-04
04-05
05-06
06-07
07-08
08-09
31424
39786
42480
48258
35747
20435
25312
25852
Credit from
Banks
RRBS
6070
7581
12404
15223
Commercial
39774 52441
81481
Banks
Grand Total
As per Table 7.1 in the year 2006-07, commercial banks were advised to
grant relief of two percentage points in the interest rate on the principal
amount up to Rs.1 lakh on each crop loan granted by banks during
kharif and Rabi of 2005-06, and credit the relief so granted to the
borrowers account before March 31, 2006... On analysing the availability
of the institutional credit to agricultural and other activities there is a
facilities provided by the Commercial banks, RRB and Cooperative
267
banks. The credit limit has increased from 23716 to 48258 in the year
2007-08 and subsequently due to changing scenario of the banks due to
farmer suicide and there was a reduction by the Cooperative Banks. The
credit created was only 35747 in 2008-09.RRB increased its institutional
credit limit from 6070 in 2002-03 to 25852 in 2008-2009. Commercial bank
released a credit from 399774 in 2002-2003 increased to 202856 in 200809.Total credit increased from 69560 to 264455 in 2008-09.
As mentioned in Table 7.2 in the next page the Kissan Credit Card (KCC)
Scheme was introduced in 1998-99 to enable the farmers to purchase
agricultural inputs and draw cash for their production needs. During
2007-08, 84.7 lakh KCCs amounting with limits aggregating Rs. 88,264
Crores were issued. During 2008-09 (till February 2009), a total of 47.26
lakh KCCs amounting with limits aggregating Rs. 26,828 Crores were
issued. Total KCC issued by the Cooperative banks, RRB and
Commercial banks amount to 808.00 lakh since 1998-99 to 2008-09.out
of this Cooperative banks issued 358.63 lakh and 336.74 by Public
Sector Commercial Banks and RRB issued 112.63 lakh. Major KCC is
issued by the Cooperative banks to help the farmers though involve risk
associated with farming.
268
Co-operative
RRBs
Banks
Public sector
Total
commercial banks
1998-99
1.56
0.06
6.22
7.84
1999-00
35.95
1.73
13.66
51.34
2000-01
56.14
6.48
23.90
86.52
2001-02
54.36
8.34
30.71
93.41
2002-03
45.79
9.64
27.00
82.43
2003-04
48.78
12.75
30.94
92.47
2004-05
35.56
17.29
43.95
96.8
2005-06
25.98
12.49
41.65
80.12
2006-07
22.97
14.06
48.08
85.11
2007-08
20.91
17.73
46.06
84.7
2008-09#
10.63
12.06
24.57
47.26
Total
358.63
336.74
808.00
112.63
269
adjustment
programs
may
also
affect
employment
270
year
housing, personal
2007-08
the
bank
and educational.
had
participated
In the
in
the
272
Gross NPA
Net NPA
2002
27.85 (8.13)
19.29 (5.77)
2003
46.11 (10.81)
32.16 (7.78)
2004
76.12 (13.20)
37.26 (6.93)
2005
96.07 (13.79)
42.21 (6.56)
2006
88.05 (9.98)
13.59 (1.59)
2007
95.65 (8.54)
61.15 (6.320
2008
150.30 (11.31)
26.08 (2.03)
273
274
study carried out by the Credit Suisse revealed that equity investment in
the US yielded almost close to zero return in real terms during 20002008.This is quiet contrary to the expectations of the US investors.
Since 1802goverment control they have been enjoying a return in
excess of an average of 4% over government bondholders. Following
such untruly profit without proper supervision and credit bubble finally
burst. Improved financial literacy results in better understanding of
financial products both assets and liabilities products by the customer.
Such knowledgeable consumers make more discerning choice of
investments and other financial products.
7.4. C.The collapse of the Global Trust Bank
On July 24, 2004, RBI imposed 3 month moratorium on withdrawals
exceeding Rs. 10000/- for depositors of the Global Trust Bank (GTB).
Depositors were caught by surprise and close to a run on the bank
ensued. The government allayed the fears of the depositors within 48
hours though announcing the merger of the bank with Oriental Bank of
Commerce (OBC) a healthy profit making public sector banks. Collapse
of a private bank is not a new concept. Nedungadi Bank BenarasState
Bank within two preceding years to GTB. The fall of GTB is special for
several reasons. For one, unlike the failures, GTB is a new PSB started
in 1994with several high profile investors, including the International
Finance Corporation. The case also raises troubling questions about the
supervisory mechanism in India. At the time of its collapse, GTB had a
portfolio, 20% of which was made of NPAs. Its total losses amounted to a
whopping Rs. 272 Crores in 2003-04.The RBI was aware of the problems
275
of GTB since at least 2001-02.In March 2002, RBIs special audit found
that GTB had a negative net worth, a quiet different figure from GTBs
own audited results showing a net worth of Rs.400 Crores. The RBI
forced GTB to change its auditors and complained about the old auditors
to the institute of the Chartered Accountant of India.GTB was in RBIs
close inspection since then and in September, 2003 the apex bank
expressed satisfaction at its positive operating profits.
The financial mismanagement is only one portion of the fact. The banks
promoter, Ramesh Gelli, had been indicted of close relationship with
Ketan Parekh, master mind behind a major stock market scam. The
promoters had been blamed for rigging the stock price of GTB before a
proposed merger with the UTI bank in 2001.Gelli was forced to step
down as GTB chairman after these findings. He made his way back to the
GTB board yet again. These issues raise important questions about
corporate governance in the banks and the efficacy of the regulators in
the system.
Merging failing banks with healthy private sector banks seems to be
favoured strategy of the RBI and government. Benares State Bank was
merged with the Bank of Baroda and Nedungadi Bank with Punjab
National Bank. With the merger of GTB with the several times larger
OBC, a bank with Zero NPAs and a profit of Rs.686 Crores in 2003-04,
confirms the pattern. Apparently OBC was on a look out for a bank with
strong presence in the south and GTB fitted the bill in that regard.
Clearly the government will not let private bank depositors suffer.
276
7.5. Conclusions
The retail loan has contributed significantly in credit growth of the
banks in past few years. It has also fuelled overall economic growth.
Assets impairment in housing loan in India so far is much less than
other sector and there is no systemic finance bubble as such. Since
retail loan is different ball game and banks have no previous experience,
it is necessary that banks should put in place required risk management
system so that credit is given to right person and default is kept to
minimum. With setting up of CIBIL credit history of the borrowers will
come handy to manage operational risks. Housing Finance is an
emerging area having a huge potential for the deployment of bank
funds. It is also social responsibility of the government to provide
shelter to the people and therefore a lot of initiatives are being taken by
the government to provide houses to the public. Systems and
procedures of public sector banks are very good, if followed properly,
the chances of fraud will be minimized upto a great extent. Nevertheless
above mentioned precautions will enable the bankers to curb frauds and
public money can be saved.
The traditional canons of lending and investment VIZ liquidity, safety and
profitability hold good even today. Liquidity through inflow of funds by
277
278
CHAPTER 8
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
8.1. Introduction
Banking in has transformed itself from a sluggish business to a dynamic
industry since the economic liberalisation of the 1990s.The mighty PSBs
dominated until 1990s and enjoyed strong system support and the
benefits of government ownership. They still hold 70% of the sectors
assets. Private banks have focused on leaner retail banking operations,
and are wilfully moving away from the bank brand hub with more focus
on the other channels like online banking mobile banking etc. New
private sector banks in the country are leading from the front with the
nifty technology and sophisticated management, while the PSB have
well documented processes, with multiple levels of controls and
approvals, and are more branch-oriented.PSB has not experienced the
kind of losses that financial institutions of other countries have faced.
Supported by the strong economic growth of the past, prudent
regulations, absence of complex financial products and low defaulters
ratio, the sector managed to withstand the global financial turmoil.
Indian banks have proved to be efficient users of capital and compare
positively with the banking sector in other emerging markets on metrics
like profitability and NPAs.
8.1. a. NPA is those loans given by banks or financial institutions which
borrowers default in making payment of principal amount or interest.
279
When a bank is not able to recover the loan given or not getting regular
interest on such loan, the flow of funds in banking industry is affected.
Also the earning capacity is adversely affected. This has direct and
immediate impact on bank profitability and efficiency. Under the
prudential norms, banks are not allowed to book any income from NPA.
Also they have to make necessary provisions for NPA which affects the
profitability adversely. Lower profitability of banking sector affects its
growth and expansion. NPA is double edged sword. On one hand banks
cannot recognize interest income on NPA and on the other hand, it is a
drain of banks profitability. Moreover profits earned are required to be
diverted for provision on NPA. The high level of NPA is dangerous to the
very existence of banks. Many banks in East Asian countries had to
close down due to high level of NPA.
8.1. b. Since there is slow down in economy since last two years, credit
off take has come down significantly. While there is plenty of liquidity,
the fear of NPA resulted in banks exhibiting a definite reluctance to lend.
Such situation has had an adverse effect on profitability as income by
way of interest on advances reduces, whereas due to excess liquidity in
the system, interest expenditure on deposits increases.
8.1. c. Public sector banks in India are covering nearly 85% of Indian
banking. Inspite of various private sector banks, and starting of new
private sector banks, the PSBs are dominating as far as banking
business in India is concerned. The profitability and operational
280
efficiency of each PSB is different from that of others and most of them
are having poor efficiency and profitability.
8.1. d. Organizational restructuring for improving governance of the
banks and enhancement in management involvement and efficiency.
Financial restructuring refers to injecting capital by the government with
required and necessary conditions. Systemic restructuring provides for
legal changes and institutional building for supporting the restructuring
process.
281
282
283
284
cooperative bank has more NPA since they give preferences to priority
and weaker section of the borrowers.
8.3. d. The trend analysis of Gross NPA and Net NPA of NBFC clearly
shows that there is overall reduction in the Gross and Net NPA since
2001 to 2009.since the Net NPA is calculated after the adjustment
made from the reserves set aside in the balance sheet. In 2001and
2002 the Net NPA is approximately 50% of gross NPA and since 2003
onwards it is more than 50% difference between Gross and Net NPA.
8.3.e. Several Committees, Task Forces and Research Studies have
identified the main causes for the increasing of NPAs in priority sector
advances of the banks. The banks face NPAs due to external and
internal factors. External factors are due to non viable activities in
rural areas. The internal factors are due to faulty assessment of the
loan, ineffective supervision and absence of timely action, etc.
External factors are more dangerous than internal factors. External
factors are natural calamities, wrong selection of borrowers etc.
8.3.f. In the management of NPAs reduction of NPA is healthy practice
than curing it at a later date. Reward for the bank staff and punishment
for the defaulter borrowers. The banker should realize that they have
lent the loan and should also recover personally and should not
depend on some external factor. Recovery of loan is the sole
responsibility of bankers who agreed to grant loan. On the other hand
a combination of directed lending and social banking relegated
profitability and competitiveness to the background. The net result
was unsustainable NPAs and consequently a higher effective cost of
285
banking service. One of the main causes of NPAs into banking sector
is the directed loans system under which commercial banks are
required a prescribed percentage of their credit (40%) to priority
sector. The problem India faces is not lack of strict prudential norms
but
8.4. Conclusions
Bhagirathi Gramvikas Pratishthan, a Registered Voluntary organization
working in the Kokan Region of Maharashtra, Specifically working in
the Area of Rural Development. As a part of routine Project planning,
Bhagirathis Team had done a Baseline Survey to identify the financial
requirements of Rural Populations, and the purpose of requirement.
After the Detailed analysis, they found that; The Financial requirement
of Rural Person or a Farmer is quite less. I.e. amount ranging between
Rs. 5,000/- to Rs. 20,000/.
The Challenges a Rural Person encounters specifically for availing the
loan is the Time Taken for Disbursement, as well as multiple visit to
Bank for availing the Loan is not a viable option. As the rural person or
farmer has to travel to a long distance, due to which the loss of time and
money for travel is one of the major reason, along with the disturbance
in routine farm activity. All these Factors make the loan Disbursement a
Painful task for the Rural Customer. Over and above this, at times the
Designated Bank official will have a Negative Perception towards the
Farmer and Agro allied activity, which further increases the frustration
of rural customer while availing the loan. All these Findings were
286
Bank
had
implemented
the
Concept
of
Single
Day
Source:
Personal Interaction with Dr. Prasad Deodar, President Bhagirathi
Gramvikas Pratishthan, Sindhudurg, Maharashtra.
(Website: www.bhagirathgram.org)
287
CHAPTER 9
SUGGESTION & RECOMMENDATIONS
9.1. The future picture of Commercial banks more so the banks &
financial institution seem to be brighter. Study suggests that the NPAs
of banks & FI will decline marginally both in terms of Gross and Net
figures over next three years. This may be due to higher provisions,
which the banks have been providing. The real issues are percentage of
NPA declining over the years but the absolute figures seem to be
increasing. A strong banking sector is important for a flourishing
economy. The failure of the banking sector may have an adverse impact
on other sectors.
9.2. Credit to priority sectors have higher NPAs, due to increase in
outstanding amount in priority sector the banks face problems in further
disbursement and increase their existing profits. Hence managers of
rural and semi-urban branches generally sanction these loans. In the
changed context of new prudential norms and emphasis on quality
lending and profitability, managers should make it amply clear to
potential borrowers that banks resources are scarce and these are
meant to finance viable ventures so that these are repaid on time and
relevant to other needy borrowers for improving the economic lot of
maximum number of households. Hence, selection of right borrowers,
viable economic activity, adequate finance and timely disbursement,
correct end use of funds and timely recovery of loans is absolutely
288
289
290
291
Appendix 1
NPAs Agriculture/Gross NPAs
Name of the
Sr.No Banks
1999
2000
India Group
15.1
Bank of India
13.32 18.62 13.80 11.69 14.08 19.10 17.88 21.34 20.57 32.01
Canara Bank
10.87 15.93 16.60 20.17 15.55 13.99 10.34 18.69 15.36 18.72
Indian Bank
8.74
Punjab
2007
2008
8.21
11.20
9.32
9.47
9.93
17.60 15.15 13.70 12.65 12.35 20.60 13.57 16.96 17.64 19.59
16.79 15.35 20.50 23.36 20.90 21.23 18.14 15.71 12.17 13.84
7.14
6.61
8.88
13.06
12.29 11.59 10.10 11.09 12.46 13.36 19.95 19.77 29.34 27.52
Corporation
Bank
11
2006
Allahabad
Bank
10
2005
Oriental Bank
of Commerce
2004
Bank of
Maharashtra
2003
Union Bank of
India
2002
State Bank of
National Bank
6
2001
9.93
7.23
10.39
13.2
7.10
7.81
8.16
30.72
Indian
Overseas
Bank
12
13
9.72
10.66 24.15
Bank of
Baroda
15.59 15.96 16.70 14.39 15.13 16.44 14.08 14.68 20.48 22.11
Dena Bank
11.80 12.88
7.90
8.09
8.74
292
14
United Bank of
India
15
13.43 16.78 15.00 15.08 19.01 20.36 20.81 19.69 18.10 17.56
Central Bank
of India
13.59
15.4
17.52
22.8
16
Andhra Bank
9.67
4.70
3.42
17
Punjab and
8.28
8.33
21.65 39.28
Sind Bank
18
8.93
8.31
6.96
9.92
22.1
10.73 56.86
Syndicate
Bank
13.76 13.36 14.63 15.03 15.55 14.11 11.07 12.42 12.78 14.01
19
Uco Bank
20
Vijaya Bank
21
10.7
8.69
10.75
0.5
5.3
3.1
293
Appendix 2
Distribution of PSBs According to percentage of NPAs in SSI to NPAs Priority Sector
Lending
Percentage of NPAs in SSI to Gross NPAs
Sr.
Name of the
No
Bank
2005
India Group
19.4
19.1
18.8
18.6
18.1
15.0
12.36
12.1
10.8
10.1
Bank of India
12.4
10.7
15.6
15.4
18.3
19.1
19.1
21.3
21.9
22.9
Canara Bank
18.7
22.0
31.8
22.5
24.2
14.0
12.9
24.0
10.1
4.72
Indian Bank
13.2
14.3
19.8
18.2
23.8
29.4
35.8
36.7
34.3
34.0
Punjab
17.1
23.6
21.1
19.4
14.7
19.9
24.3
25.4
29.2
27.4
24.1
20.7
17.2
16.2
19.6
20.6
18.1
14.7
13.4
17.4
18.4
19.9
27.5
21.9
21.8
21.2
20.3
18.6
15.3
15.5
of Commerce
27.5
31.4
14.5
26.6
21.2
25.4
19.0
14.5
13.7
19.8
Allahabad
18.4
17.5
14.4
14.3
14.6
13.4
18.5
13.0
14.3
12.5
10
Corporation
18.0
16.3
17.8
11.2
12.4
10.5
9.7
7.11
5.7
9.0
11
Indian
20.3
20.6
20.9
20.9
20.2
24.2
25.1
27.4
33.2
26.6
Baroda
22.2
16.9
18.7
17.5
18.8
16.4
18.4
20.8
13.8
12.4
Dena Bank
21.4
14.1
13.6
17.8
19.7
20.1
19.3
19.3
17.3
10.2
State Bank of
National Bank
6
Union Bank
of India
Bank of
Maharashtra
Oriental Bank
Overseas
Bank
12
13
Bank of
294
14
United Bank
of India
24.1
20.7
17.2
16.2
19.6
20.4
20.5
19.1
18.1
23.2
of India
24.5
23.5
22.7
23.4
23.0
22.1
23.9
22.6
20.2
27.1
16
Andhra Bank
23.9
22.6
22.6
24.3
22
18.9
17.3
14.9
9.7
18.9
17
Punjab and
18.7
18.8
21.1
19.4
14.7
12.9
7.2
21.1
14.4
18.0
Bank
24.2
23.2
22.9
22.5
19.7
19.2
18.1
13.4
43.5
9.8
19
Uco Bank
23.9
24.8
16.4
14.3
16.3
11.0
12.1
12.9
33.4
11.8
20
Vijaya Bank
14.9
14.8
22.8
15.8
15.3
15.5
11.8
5.8
56.4
6.6
21
0.9
4.9
3.1
15
Central Bank
Sind Bank
18
Syndicate
295
Appendix 3
Proportion of NPA in Other priority Sector Credit to Gross NPAs of Public Sector Banks
Percentage of NPAs in Other Priority Sector to Gross NPAs (March Ending)
Sr.
No
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
10.2
11.2
10.4
11.1
11.9
15.5
19.7
25.4
27.4
26.6
Bank of India
8.7
6.9
11.0
10.1
10.5
12.9
14.5
18.1
23.8
29.2
Canara Bank
8.2
13.0
12.0
7.6
14.6
14.5
18.8
18.2
36.6
25.3
Indian Bank
7.0
7.5
8.9
8.9
13.2
24.2
29.8
31.8
39.4
17.1
Punjab National
5
Bank
9.1
11.2
13.5
14.4
13.0
12.4
12.8
18.5
25.7
25.3
16.8
21.7
18.5
22.2
26.9
29.3
21.3
28.9
31.3
39.0
17.7
22.0
16.5
15.7
17.3
19.3
20.2
19.1
27.9
34.6
Bank of
7
Maharashtra
Oriental bank of
Commerce
9.6
14.7
22.3
9.1
8.7
12.1
8.0
11.3
15.65
21.4
Allahabad bank
12.7
12.1
13.2
13.3
14.9
22.5
21.8
29.9
27.7
31.8
10
Corporation bank
11.0
18.0
14.5
14.9
16.1
22.6
30.5
26.0
34.9
39.9
Indian Overseas
11
Bank
8.9
8.1
8.7
7.8
6.2
11.7
14.2
17.2
21.9
24.8
12
Bank of Baroda
9.8
10.6
9.3
8.9
8.8
9.9
11.1
15.4
19.8
31.3
13
15.0
14.1
14.2
13.8
15.1
17.0
21.3
28.9
31.3
39.0
16.8
21.7
18.5
22.2
26.9
29.3
33.3
32.6
29.4
30.6
15.6
15.5
15.3
15.5
16.4
18.8
23.0
21.5
24.4
20.4
United Bank of
14
India
Central Bank of
15
India
296
16
Andhra Bank
14.2
14.1
14.04
17.04
15.65
20.79
27.08
25.11
23.84
14.35
Bank
17.2
11.4
9.66
8.23
21.53
10.24
6.83
14.66
34.49
23.94
18
Syndicate Bank
9.30
13.4
14.84
14.85
14.63
17.36
23.10
29.50
43.47
35.88
19
Uco Bank
17.4
17.7
22.29
17.87
18.83
19.91
21.33
24.27
33.35
39.40
20
Vijaya Bank
12.0
12.1
17.06
19.13
35.55
19.35
25.24
47.71
56.38
60.84
21
297
Appendix 4
Table: Loans Sanctioned and Disbursed under RIDF
(As at end-March 2009)
Source: NABARD.
RIDF
Year
No. of
Projects
1
I
2
1995
3
4,168
4
2,000
5
1,906
6
1,761
Ratio of loans
disbursed to loans
sanctioned
(Per cent)
7
92.4
II
1996
8,193
2,500
2,636
2,398
91.0
III
1997
14,345
2,500
2,733
2,454
89.8
IV
1998
6,171
3,000
2,903
2,482
85.5
1999
12,106
3,500
3,434
3,055
89.0
VI
2000
43,168
4,500
4,489
4,071
90.7
VII
2001
24,598
5,000
4,582
4,053
88.5
VIII
2002
20,887
5,500
5,950
5,142
86.4
IX
2003
19,548
5,500
5,639
4,870
86.4
2004
17,190
8,000
7,717
6,198
80.3
XI
2005
29,875
8,000
8,301
5,728
69.0
XII
2006
42,279
10,000
10,601
5,771
54.4
XIII
2007
36,948
12,000
12,749
5,057
39.7
XIV
2008
85,527
14,000
14,719
3,013
20.5
3,65,003
86,000
88,359
56,052
63.4
Total
Loans
Disbursed
(Rs. Crores)
2006
4,000
4,000
4,000
100.0
XIII
2007
4,000
4,000
4,000
100.0
XIV
2008
4,000
4,000
4,000
100.0
12,000
12,000
12,000
100.0
Total
Source: NABARD.
298
Appendix 5
Advances of private Bank to Agriculture & weaker Sections as on last reporting Friday 0f March
Weaker Section Advances
Sr.
No
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2.72
6.09
0.93
0.00
1.45
1.6
1.69
1.63
0.08
4.93
0.05
0.01
0.67
0.7
3.29
3.79
Ltd
Development Credit
Bank Ltd.
6.23
0.00
0.00
0.10
1.0
0.70
2.30
0.65
7.55
0.00
42.43
0.07
0.5
0.80
0.72
6.82
0.00
0.32
0.13
0.5
1.11
2.03
3.75
9.41
4.30
1.02
4.12
4.5
4.17
4.16
6.45
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.31
Bank Ltd
Bank Ltd
1.59
8.78
0.00
1.34
2.39
6.9
6.27
6.56
1.94
7.04
2.09
1.65
0.67
3.2
6.43
7.18
10
4.02
11.58
3.76
0.37
5.33
5.1
6.59
6.92
0.00
6.53
14.68
4.36
8.24
3.16
7.2
6.50
9.06
3.27
8.83
2.46
2.53
1.9
1.12
1.42
1.65
13.04
3.59
2.04
3.16
3.8
3.86
2.65
Ltd
12
13
14
Bank of Rajasthan
Vysya Bank/Ing Bank
15
Ltd
16
0.00
0.00
23.62
3.39
0.8
0.53
0.24
17
4.5
2.66
0.82
0.64
1.36
1.7
1.54
1.83
Bank Ltd
12.1
3.07
3.62
27.91
3.04
3.1
3.13
6.03
19
1.3
2.04
2.04
4.18
2.07
1.7
1.37
1.26
1.11
10.12
10.2
NA
NA
Ganesh Khurwad
20
Bank Ltd
299
Ltd
0.13
0.29
0.9
1.03
NA
22
9.1
6.40
5.10
0.19
3.08
2.4
1.24
8.2
23
2.7
1.71
1.51
0.09
0.98
1.8
2.23
2.41
0.00
0.00
25
2.60
2.17
1.94
2.87
3.42
2.7
4.05
4.49
26
3.94
4.28
5.08
0.28
2.28
2.0
7.63
NA
2.04
7.32
5.35
10.32
4.84
5.1
NA
NA
Ltd
28
Bank of Punjab
0.00
0.00
23.62
3.39
0.8
0.53
0.24
29
0.00
0.10
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
30
0.00
0.00
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.16
0.00
0.32
0.13
0.5
NA
NA
Bank Ltd
300
Appendix 6
Non-Performing Assets in Advances to Weaker Section Under Priority Sector with reference to Private
Sector Banks
Sr.
No
1
2
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
67.23
49.24
44.09
26.49
28.70
51.2
32.09
61.94
0.43
79.66
27.03
1.94
0.75
64.66
0.01
0.03
27.18
0.00
_
2.56
_
5.52
_
5.80
0.00
5.70
_
5.88
_
3.75
__
3.75
_
3.75
13.00
4.79
1.76
6.1
9.23
4.48
0.8
3.19
15.62
39.82
25.99
3.14
10.85
9.09
3.85
1.72
0.99
0.24
0.70
_
18.36
_
13.19
_
11.72
_
11.99
_
9.07
_
6.79
_
4.60
_
5.70
30.73
31.93
39.72
31.67
23.34
15.71
11.06
29.88
_
_
_
14.8
NA
6.55
_
5.74
_
3.36
_
6.94
_
1.3
_
7.22
7.34
13.91
7.83
2.83
4.67
3.20
0.69
30.99
6.21
23.29
14.03
12.78
13.34
13.32
1.77
8.3
6.3
8.77
4.7
5.07
1.28
9.95
10.04
20
5.61
8.77
NA
NA
21
16.19
19.67
23.61
NA
NA
22
11.92
10.21
8.28
5.78
10.09
1.27
23
15.27
12.6
13.38
15.71
27.19
21.33
14.68
24
25
29.62
15.53
27.17
28
35.24
40
9.34
7.10
26
24.85
14.68
20.17
18.51
16.67
17.10
NA
12.61
14.77
24.32
13.14
15.65
23.29
NA
NA
27
28
Bank of Punjab
10
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
29
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
30
11.90
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
31
301
Appendix 7
Sectorwise Non Performing Assetsof Private Sector Bank As on 31st March -----(SSI)
Sr.
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Catholic Syrian
No
1
Bank Ltd
2
3.78
4.81
1.04
0.81
9.73
4.48
3.28
8.91
12.23
21.92 3.04
2.48
3.27
1.83
1.60
0.03
0.31
5.52
4.04
6.59
3.04
Bank Ltd
6
Ltd
7
Bank of Rajasthan
7.60
16.61 7.25
Tamilnad
9.54
11.3
11.81 9.82
16.56
Mercantile Bank
Ltd
9
Danalakshmi Bank
10.92 9.16
9.19
Ltd
10
Lakshmi Vilas
Bank
11
Kotak Mahindra
0.00
7.47
Bank Ltd
12
13
14
Development
credit Bank
15
Vysya Bank/Ing
Bank Ltd
302
16
Centurion Bank
0.32
4.40
0.00
3.57
2.67
18.30
Ltd
17
7.46
8.37
Ltd
18
Jammu and
Kashmir Bank Ltd
19
Karnataka Bank
Ltd
20
Ganesh Khurwad
16.84 9.64
13.45 6.82
14.79 16
8.90
9.49
NA
NA
Bank Ltd
21
9.47
10.54 2.85
NA
Ltd
22
23
24
20.57 7.21
4.15
17.96 0.71
10.78 16.51
_
International Bank
Ltd
25
Ltd
26
20.57 7.21
27
United Western
7.33
4.15
17.96 0.71
_
NA
India Ltd
28
Bank of Punjab
29
7.54
30
31
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
10.21 3.44
7.86
NA
NA
NA
5.52
5.66
NA
NA
4.04
7.69
4.40
NA
Bank Ltd
Source: RBI Publication & WWW.rbi.org.in
303
Appendix 8
Sectorwise Non Performing Assets of Private Sector Bank As on 31st March -----Other
Priority
Name of the
Sr.No Bank
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Catholic Syrian
1
Bank Ltd
0.15
4.72
1.86
0.00
0.20
0.01
0.05
6.54
0.22
0.91
6.50
3.93
5.37
6.18
11.58 11.20
8.84
7.07
10.42
9.23
7.11
7.65
29.88 11.80
5.28
0.11
0.59
14.03
4.68
0.00
1.46
0.08
17.85
6.29
6.36
7.02
10.46
8.94
UTI Bank
Ltd/Axis Bank
5
Ltd
Karur Vysya
Bank Ltd
Bank of
Rajasthan
Tamilnad
Mercantile Bank
Ltd
Danalakshmi
9
Bank Ltd
0.75
35.92 23.46
Lakshmi Vilas
10
Bank
5.80
7.35
Kotak Mahindra
11
Bank Ltd
12
13
23.19 38.49
35.74
4.95
0.89
9.45
11.37
5.92
4.53
5.14
3.20
9.53
24.98
Development
14
credit Bank
18.26 11.40
Vysya Bank/Ing
15
Bank Ltd
8.66
304
Centurion Bank
16
Ltd
3.81
3.07
2.85
0.28
7.09
6.7
7.4
7.31
9.86
9.33
7.99
9.18
11.60
Ltd
Jammu and
Kashmir Bank
18
Ltd
Karnataka Bank
19
Ltd
5.96
6.49
5.67
6.04
7.28
9.87
15.73 16.90
NA
NA
1.41
3.62
3.86
3.81
NA
Ganesh
Khurwad Bank
20
Ltd
Lord Krishna
21
Bank Ltd
1.85
2.47
4.37
Nainital Bank
22
Ltd
Ratnakar Bank
23
Ltd
SBI Commercial
& International
24
Bank Ltd
0.00
4.05
South Indian
25
Bank Ltd
10.57 11.24
8.97
26
10.66
9.76
8.53
6.31
6.40
6.47
49.06
NA
United Western
27
India Ltd
8.36
8.50
NA
NA
28
Bank of Punjab
1.15
1.53
1.24
2.76
0.94
NA
NA
NA
Global Trust
29
Bank
0.29
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
30
7.06
23.83
NA
NA
NA
NA
6.54
0.22
0.19
0.00
1.46
0.08
NA
NA
UTI Bank
Ltd/Axis Bank
31
Ltd
305
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2.72
6.09
0.93
0.00
1.45
1.6
1.69
1.63
0.08
4.93
0.05
0.01
0.67
0.7
3.29
3.79
Catholic Syrian
1
Bank Ltd
Development Credit
Bank Ltd.
6.23
0.00
0.00
0.10
1.0
0.70
2.30
0.65
7.55
0.00
42.43
0.07
0.5
0.80
0.72
6.82
0.00
0.32
0.13
0.5
1.11
2.03
3.75
9.41
4.30
1.02
4.12
4.5
4.17
4.16
6.45
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.31
1.59
8.78
0.00
1.34
2.39
6.9
6.27
6.56
Bank Ltd
Karur Vysya Bank
Ltd
Bank Ltd
Danalakshmi Bank
Ltd
1.94
7.04
2.09
1.65
0.67
3.2
6.43
7.18
10
4.02
11.58
3.76
0.37
5.33
5.1
6.59
6.92
0.00
6.53
14.68
4.36
8.24
3.16
7.2
6.50
9.06
3.27
8.83
2.46
2.53
1.9
1.12
1.42
1.65
13.04
3.59
2.04
3.16
3.8
3.86
2.65
Kotak Mahindra
11
Bank Ltd
12
13
14
Bank of Rajasthan
Vysya Bank/Ing
15
Bank Ltd
16
0.00
0.00
23.62
3.39
0.8
0.53
0.24
17
4.5
2.66
0.82
0.64
1.36
1.7
1.54
1.83
306
Bank Ltd
12.1
3.07
3.62
27.91
3.04
3.1
3.13
6.03
19
1.3
2.04
2.04
4.18
2.07
1.7
1.37
1.26
Ganesh Khurwad
20
Bank Ltd
10.1
_
1.11
10.2
NA
NA
0.13
0.29
0.9
1.03
NA
9.1
6.40
5.10
0.19
3.08
2.4
1.24
8.2
2.7
1.71
1.51
0.09
0.98
1.8
2.23
2.41
0.00
0.00
25 Ltd
2.60
2.17
1.94
2.87
3.42
2.7
4.05
4.49
3.94
4.28
5.08
0.28
2.28
2.0
7.63
NA
2.04
7.32
5.35
10.32
4.84
5.1
NA
NA
28 Bank of Punjab
0.00
0.00
23.62
3.39
0.8
0.53
0.24
0.00
0.10
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
0.00
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.16
0.00
0.32
0.13
0.5
NA
NA
Ltd
22
United Western
27 India Ltd
307
Sir / Maam,
I am a Research Scholar registered with Padamshree Dr. D.Y.Patil
Universitys Department of Management Studies, CBD Belapur for Ph.D.
The Research Work is being carried out under the guidance of Dr.
Rajinder S. Aurora. The topic of my research is NPAs-A comparative
Analysis on Banks & Financial Institutions & its Implications. As a part
of my research work I am required to substantiate my hypothesis
through primary data. I am writing to you in this connection. I shall be
highly obliged if you could spare some time from your busy schedule
and respond to the questionnaire attached herewith. We would like to
assure you that the data collected would be used only for the purpose of
research and the same shall be kept confidential.
Looking forward to your support in this regard and thanking you in
anticipation, I remain
Yours truly,
Mrs. Sumathi Gopal
Research Scholar
Annexure-QUESTIONNAIRE-1
308
Rs.25,000 to Rs.50,000
Rs.50,000 to Rs.1,00,000
Yes
Alert Stage
Advance Stage
Slow
Moderate
Good
309
Above 50%-75%
Above
Low
Medium
High
No
Medium
High
NIL
25% to 50%
50% to 75%
Above
75%
10. What percentage of account attribute NPA in your bank?
Less than 25%
75%
25%-50%
50%-75%
Above
11. What precautions does your bank adopt in providing loan to the
customer?
Collateral
Security
Guarantee
Guarantee and
Any other
Collateral Security
measures
12. What type of loan does your bank provide to your customer?
Retail Loan
Loan
Educational Loan
Agricultural Loan
Personal
310
13. What age group does your bank prefer in providing credit to the
customer? Why?
18 years to
60
25 years
Above 25 years
Above 40 years
Above
-60 years
years
40 years
14. What are the follow up measures in reading the outstanding credit?
Sale of Collateral Security
Recovery
Appointing
Agent
Mortgage
26-50
50-75
75-100
17. What measures do you take while issuing Credit Card to your
customer?
Educational Background
Ass
Age
Monthly Wages
Value Of
High Risk
above
Medium Risk
Low Risk
None of the
Officer
Manager
General Manager
Vice-President
311
20. Who shall be made liable incase of failure to recover the outstanding
loan amount?
Bank
Employee
Customer
Appointment of
Arbitrator
23. Does your bank incur losses since recovery involves a huge cost
thus resulting in reduction in banks profit?
Low
Medium
High
NIL
Which
Students
Section
of
Weaker Section
people contribute
endors
maximum
credit
card
outstanding?
Farmers
Students
Weaker Section
Vendors
26. Any special remedial measures adopted by the bank in recovery
procedures?
Sanction
Monitoring
NPA Recovery
312
27. How much time does it take to recover the money from your
customer?
Within the Time Limit
28. Whether a Foreign Currency Loan is also available from the Bank, if
yes, whether it be availed overseas?
India
Country
Foreign Country
Cooperative
Weaker Section
Commercial
31. Which sector contributes maximum NPA in their bank and their
percentage?
SSI
priority
Agriculture
Weaker Section
Non-
313
ANNEXURE- Questionnaire 2
INTERVIEW FOR THE PURPOSE OF RESEARCH ON NPA/ BAD LOANS
FOR PH.D.
NAME: _______________________________________________________
STATUS
: __________________________________________________
ADDRESS : ___________________________________________________
__________________________________________________
QUALIFICATION: _______________________TEL. NO.________________
SECTION I
Following are some of the causes of any Bank Account turning NPA/
BAD. In case you disagree with any of the cause please give reason in
support.
PART-A : APPRAISAL STAGE
1)
2)
3)
4)
Please Put
Agree
__________________________________________________
Disagree
Agree
__________________________________________________
Disagree
Agree
__________________________________________________
Disagree
Agree
__________________________________________________
Disagree
Agree
Disagree
Agree
Disagree
Agree
Disagree
Agree
Disagree
Agree
Disagree
314
Agree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Disagree
Agree
Disagree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Agree
Agree
Disagree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Disagree
Agree
Disagree
315
Agree
Disagree
Agree
Disagree
__________________________________________________
3) Negligent approach by the bank officials in regards to
inspection of stock etc.
Agree
Disagree
__________________________________________________
4) Absence of effective monitoring
__________________________________________________
5) Absence of close supervision of loan account
__________________________________________________
6) Delayed detection of warning signals
__________________________________________________
7) Delay in initiating remedial measures and actions
__________________________________________________
Agree
Disagree
Agree
Disagree
Agree
Disagree
Agree
Disagree
SECTION II
PART A
In your opinion are three any causes other than mentioned above
1)
________________________________________________________
2)
________________________________________________________
3)
________________________________________________________
4)
________________________________________________________
5)
________________________________________________________
PART B
Which in your opinion and experience are the main causes responsible
for any account turning NPA out of causes mentioned above. (Only five
in each of the following category)
316
1)
1)
________________________________________________________
2)
________________________________________________________
3)
________________________________________________________
4)
________________________________________________________
5)
________________________________________________________
2)
1)
________________________________________________________
2)
________________________________________________________
3)
________________________________________________________
4)
________________________________________________________
5)
________________________________________________________
SECTION III
1.
YES/NO
2.
3.
in
Indian banking
system, is
it
adequate?
YES/NO
4.
5.
6.
Will this selection help bank to reduce the risk of account YES/NO
becoming NPA in early stage or even in future?
7.
317
8.
9.
Do you favour cash incentive scheme for banks staff for YES/NO
recovery of dues
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Whether
Management
Information
System
on
the YES/NO
16.
17.
318
SECTION - IV
1. It is often said that Lawyers/ advocates delays the hearing of the YES/NO
case before Courts by taking dates. Do you agree.
2. Is it a fact that bank does not provide their advocates with proper YES/NO
papers/ list of securities and documents during hearing of the
case before Court?
3. Is it true that most of the bankers does not care to renew loan
documents in time?
4. Do you feel that delay in getting decree from court to recover
banks dues make such recovery impossible difficult?
5. Do you agree that time consuming and tedious legal procedure is
responsible for slow recovery of banks overdues?
6. Do you agree that outdated laws are the major causes for
ineffective recovery of banks dues?
7. Do you feel that effective working of Board for Industrial and
Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) will help banks to recover the
long outstanding dues?
8. Do you feel that the Public Debt Recovery Act (DRT) be extended
or made applicable in all the states of India for fast recovery of
banks dues?
9. What in your opinion are the main reasons for considerable delay
in getting decree from the Court of law for Banks dues?
i)
______________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
ii) ______________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
iii)______________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
319
Abbreviation
ABC: Adjusted Bank Credit
ABS: Asset Backed Securities
AFCs: Assets Financing Companies
ALM: Asset Liability Management
AMC: Asset Management Company
ANBC: Adjusted Net Bank Credit
ARC: Asset Reconstruction Company
BCBS: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
BFS: Board for Financial Supervision
BIS: Beaureu of international Settlement
CADP: Common area development programme
CAPM: Capital Assets Pricing Model
CAR: Credit Adequate Ratio
CARE: Credit Analysis and Research Ltd
CCF: Credit Conversion Factor
CFSA: Committee on financial sector assessment
CIBIL: Credit Information Bureau Ltd
CLO: Collateralized Loan Obligation
CPs: Commercial Papers
CPC: Civil Procedure Code
CRR: Cash Reserve Ratio
CRAR: Capital Risk Weighted Asset Ratio
CRISIL: Credit Rating Information Service of India Ltd
DDP: Dessert development programme
DEA: Data Envelopment Analysis
DFI: Development Financial Institution
320
321
322
323
BIBLIOGRAPHY
CHAPTER 1
1.
2.
3.
4.
Estimates of
credit have
been made
by
D.K.Desai
(1988)
CHAPTER 2
1. Mrs. Mohina Kulkarni1 - (1986) Review of Progress Made by
Scheduled Banks since Nationalization in Financing AgricultureA study in Interstate and Regional imbalances- Mumbai University
2. Srinivasan2 - (1991) Priority Sector Lending: A study Of Indian
Experience Mumbai University
324
(2007)
Comparative
Study
on
financial
325
to
Benchmarks
Indian
Banker,
IBA
Journal,
326
327
Misleading
Ratio-Searching
Holistic
Ratio
for
Credit
Appraisal, Indian Banker, IBA Journal, Published by IBA, Vol INo.4, April, pp10-14
32. Dr. Amrit Patel32 (2006) Financing Small and Marginal Farmers:
Some Policy Issues, Indian Banker, IBA Journal, Published by
IBA, Vol I- No.4, April, pp 24-32
33. D.Rabindran James33 (2006) Educational Loan Scheme: Mitigating
Credit risk, Indian Banker, IBA Journal, Published by IBA, Vol INo.5,May, pp 16-18
34. Bagchi34 (2006) Dilution Risk: A silent Killer under Banking Credit
Risks, Indian Banker, IBA Journal, Published by IBA, Vol I- No.5,
May, pp 35-37
35. Abhinna Mohan Nanda35 (2006) Frauds in Mortgages: Prevention
Measures, Indian Banker, IBA Journal, Published by IBA, Vol INo.5October, pp 38-41
36. S.Khasnobis36 (2006) NPAs: Emerging Challenges Indian Banker,
IBA Journal, Published by IBA, Vol I- No.11, November, pp 17-20
37. S.K.Bagchi37
(2006)
Multi
Tier
Bank
Capital
under
Risk
328
(2008)
Compliance
Risk
in
Banks:
Concept,
329
330
331
CHAPTER 4
1)
2)
3)
4)
Ibid (3)
5)
Ibid (2)
6)
7)
Ibid (7)
8)
9)
332
In the 1960s and 1970s the CRR was 5% but was raised to 15% in early
1991.The SLR was 25% in 1970 and was increased to 38.5% in 1991nearly to the level of its upper limit of 40%
2.
3.
4.
5.
333
6.
7.
8.
9.
10. CMIE, Monthly Review of Indian Economy, May 1999, pp. 119.
11. CMIE, Monthly Review of Indian Economy, June 1999, pp. 110.
CHAPTER 7
1.
Shete. N.B., Priority Sector Advances of Banks during the PostReform Period, Prajnan, VOL.XXXI, No. 1, 2002-2003, NIBM, Pune,
pp21-37
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
334
7.
8.
9.
10.
335