Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Standard staining methods have been developed for carbonate rocks that are specific
for calcite (Friedman, 1959), ferroan calcite (Dickson, 1965) and magnesium-calcite
(Choquette and Trusell, 1977). These techniques are applicable to many types of
carbonate rocks, but except for a combined calcite and ferroan calcite stain, are not
normally used in any combination because they are incompatible alkaline and acidic
stains. Except for preparing and alternately staining serial thin sections, there would
be little way to examine the relationship of intergrown calcite, ferroan calcite,
magnesium-calcite and dolomite.
During a study of the mineralogy of coal balls, it became evident that standard
staining techniques were inadequate to study the relationship of the carbonate
minerals present in the coal balls. A combined calcite and ferroan calcite stain
overpowered the thin section and made observation of the intergrowths of mineral
grains difficult. Separate staining using a modified potassium ferricyanide stain and a
titan yellow stain for ferroan calcite and magnesium calcite, respectively, revealed
many details about the coal ball mineralogy, but could not be easily combined to yield
textural information.
Experimentation with staining techniques led to the realization that separate sides of a
thin section could be stained with otherwise incompatible stains and, when viewed in
transmitted light, the stains would superimpose in such a way that information about
the relationship of the minerals could be recovered.
METHOD
Step 1:
The thin section black must be smoothed to at least a semi-polish. Sanding to 6001200 mesh grit is acceptable and depends on the grain size. Fine grained
microdolomites require 1200 mesh or a 3 micron pre-polish. After sanding, the blank
should be lightly etched (15 to 30 seconds) and 1% acetic acid or 1% hydrochloric
acid are recommended.
Step 2:
The thin section blank is stained in the first stain. For this research the initial stain was
a Titan yellow stain specific for magnesium calcite:
1.0 g Titan yellow
8.0 g sodium hydroxide
4.0 g EDTA
1.0 l water
The blanks were stained at room temperature for approximately 30 minutes, rinsed
with distilled water and fixed with a 30 second immersion in:
200 g sodium hydroxide
1.0 l water
After fixing the blank was allowed to air dry.
Step 3:
The stained blank was then attached to the glass slide with epoxy mounting medium.
Tests showed that mounting of the blank using a vacuum degassing processing
resulted in less parting of the blank and also infilled porous areas that might "bleedthrough" when the second stain was applied to the thin section.
Step 4:
The mounted blank was then reduced to a thin section using standard techniques. The
surface was additionally smoothed using 600-1200 grit and lightly etched.
Step 5:
The thin section was immersed in a potassium ferricyanide (PFS) stain specific for
ferroan calcite (combined PFS and Alizarin red S can also be used but represented
"overkill" on the coal ball samples):
X-ray diffraction analysis showed that this mineral was "kutnahorite", but kutnahorite
is a manganese-magnesium member of the dolomite group (figure 6). Apparently this
mineral represents a metastable product intermediate between magnesium-calcite and
dolomite and probably has a formula of Ca(Ca,Mg)(CO 3)2. Work is proceeding on
characterizing this mineral.
REFERENCES
Barwood, H.L. 1995. Mineralogy and origin of coal balls. Geol. Soc. Am. Abst. with
Programs, North-Central and South-Central Sections 27(3):37
Choquette, P.W. and F.C. Trusell. 1978. A procedure for making the titan-yellow stain
for Mg-calcite permanent. J. Sed. Petrology 48:639-641
Dickson, J.A.D. 1965. A modified staining technique for carbonates in thin section.
Nature 205:587
Friedman, G.M. 1959 Identification of carbonate minerals by staining techniques. J.
Sed. Petrology 29:87-97
BACK
2.
Introduction
Examples
References
Introduction
Acid Rock Drainage (ARD), as described in the Introduction Page, is the product formed by the
atmospheric oxidation (i.e. by water, oxygen and carbon dioxide) of the relatively common iron sulfide
minerals pyrite (FeS2) and pyrrhotite (FeS) in the presence of (catalyzed by) bacteria (Thiobacillus
ferrooxidans), and any other products generated as a consequence of these oxidation reactions (i.e.
heavy metals solubilized by acidic solutions). To understand this more fully the basic chemistry must be
examined.
Basic Chemistry of ARD Generation
The following chemical reactions describe the oxidation of pyrite (FeS 2) to the products that constitute the
contaminants generically termed Acid Rock Drainage (ARD), although similar equations may be written
for the oxidation of pyrrhotite (FeS).
FeS2 + 7Fe2(SO4)3 + 8H2O = 15FeSO4 + 8H2SO4
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
Neutralization of the acidic metal-rich solutions that can be generated by the above chemical reactions
may also occur as a result of dissolution of neutralizing minerals (most importantly carbonates) that come
in contact with the acidic solutions. These chemical reactions must also be examined to fully understand
the processes occurring and to be able to predict the chemistry of solutions resulting from the
combination of oxidation and neutralization processes. Examples of these reactions include:
Calcite dissolution by sulfuric acid
CaCO3 + H2SO4 -> CaSO4 + H2O + CO2
(7)
(8)
Reactions of other gangue minerals may also contribute to the neutralization potential of the system
under specific pH conditions (Ritchie, 1994), for example:
Muscovite dissolution
KAl2[AlSi3O10](OH)2(s) + H+ + 3/2H2O -> K+ + 3/2Al2Si2O5(OH)4(S)
(9)
Biotite dissolution
KMg1.5Fe1.5AlSi3O10(OH)2(s) + 7H+ + 1/2H2O -> K+ + 1.5 Mg2+ + 1.5 Fe2+ +
H4SiO04 + 1/2Al2Si2O5(OH)4(s)
(10)
Albite dissolution
NaAlSi3O8(s) + H+ + 9/2H2O -> Na+ + 2H4SiO04 + 1/2Al2Si2O5(OH)4(s)
(11)
Anorthite dissolution
CaAl2Si2O8(s) + 2H+ + H2O -> Ca2+ + Al2Si2O5(OH)4(s)
(12)
K-feldspar dissolution
KAlSi3O8(s) + H+ + 9/2H2O -> K+ + 2H4SiO04 + 1/2Al2Si2O5(OH)4(s)
(13)
(14)
When studying these reactions and the resulting systems it should be clear that mineralogy is the key
factor. However, in many instances where ARD systems are studied in order to assess or predict water
quality, it is the mineralogy that is largely ignored. The primary excuse for excluding or doing only minimal
mineralogical characterization is that detailed mineralogy is often time consuming, expensive and
specialized. In recent years, more and more people in the industry have acknowledged that mineralogical
characterization is necessary, however there remains a lack of detailed work and/or interpretation of it.
Methods and Techniques
Petrographic or mineralogic examination of samples in ARD predictive work is usually conducted by
transmitted and reflected light microscopy, and by various X-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques. Although
electron probe microanalysis (EPMA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and other more specialized
techniques are employed, their use is generally confined to sulphide minerals where compositional
abnormalities affect ARD testwork interpretation. Such techniques are particularly useful in the
determination of the chemical composition of sulphide oxidation products such as rims, inclusions and
amorphous (non-crystalline) species.
Transmitted light microscopy utilizes thin (30 m) sections of samples and reflected light microscopy
utilizes polished mounted samples. Current practice combines the two sample preparation procedures to
produce polished thin sections, so that the two techniques can be used on the same sample. McCrone et
al. (1979) describe in detail the techniques of thin and polished section microscopy. Samples may be
prepared from whole rock in the form of drill core, or from fragmented material such as humidity cell feed
and residue samples, or from tailings.
Transmitted light microscopy is used to examine those minerals that transmit light in thin section, and
these include most of the gangue or non-metallic minerals that may have neutralizing capability. Reflected
light microscopy is used to examine those minerals that do not transmit light in thin section, but reflect
light to varying degrees when polished. Such minerals include metallic sulphides that may oxidize to
generate acid.
Both types of microscopy are used (often with supplementary techniques such as selective
staining or etching) to identify individual mineral grains, to determine mineral grain size and size
distribution, and to identify mineral grain spatial interrelationships.
Reaction products of sulphide oxidation (rimming of grains) are readily observed, as are many
other characteristics of mineral grains (such as inclusions) not readily seen by other investigative
techniques. These capabilities of microscopic examination are extremely useful in ARD studies of
both tailings and waste rock.
The ultimate size limitation of these methods is the wavelength of the light used, and the optical
arrangement of the microscope, but it is typically about 1 m grain size. Consequently, samples
containing significant quantities of clay minerals (< 2 m) present identification problems to the
microscopist.
It is usually possible to determine the frequency of occurrence of individual minerals within a sample by
the examination of a number of fields of view. Quantitative mineralogical analysis by this method is
termed modal analysis.
For some well-defined, unaltered, rock types it has been possible to calculate a modal analysis (or
quantitative mineralogical analysis) from elemental oxide analyses of whole rock samples using
mathematical techniques. Such calculations, known as CIPW from the initials of their original developers
(Cross et al., 1902), can be undertaken by computer programs such as NewPet for DOS (Clarke, D.,
1993). However, for the rock types typically associated with significant sulphide mineralization, CIPW
calculations have not yet been shown to have general applicability (Lawrence and Sheske, 1997,
Paktunc, 1998c) because they were developed for unaltered magmas, and cannot be applied to
sedimentary or metamorphic rocks or to altered igneous rocks. This is most unfortunate, since whole rock
elemental oxide analysis is generally less expensive than microscopic analysis and does not require the
considerable skill of an mineral microscopist. Paktunc (1998b) has developed a computer program called
MODAN that may be used to determine modal mineralogy from whole rock elemental oxide analysis and
a knowledge of the mineral species present in a sample. Paktunc (1998a) has also discussed the use of
MODAN in conjunction of mineral reactivity data to estimate the Neutralizing Potential (NP) of samples
containing neutralizing silicates in addition to carbonates.
Low-power stereoscopic microscopy is also a useful tool, particularly in the examination of tailings and
other relatively fine, fragmented samples. This technique is valuable in the determination of degree of
sulphide mineral liberation and may also be used as an aid in sulphide mineral identification. The
identification of mineral grains is well covered by Jones and Fleming (1965). It is usually preferable to
examine screen-size fractions when using low-power stereoscopic microscopy, and it is helpful also to
remove the bulk of the gangue mineral particles using one or more heavy liquid procedures at a Relative
Density of 2.8 to 2.9 (Mills, 1978,1985).
Some workers (Jambor and Blowes, 1998) obtain an X-ray diffractogram for each sample examined by
transmitted and reflected light microscopy and compare the mineral identification data obtained from the
two procedures for corroboration. This is a highly recommended approach.
Individual mineral grains greater than about 100 m may be positively identified by XRD using the X-ray
film method with Debye-Scherrer or Gandolfi cameras, or with modern microdiffractometry instruments
(Jambor and Blowes, 1998). These XRD methods all give qualitative data on mineral identity.
Examples
It is the intention of this site to act as an introduction to the mineralogical and petrological basics
associated with ARD in an effort to emphasize the importance of mineralogical characterization in ARD
studies and prediction. One of the major criticisms of petrological characterization of minerals is that it is
largely non-quantitative or semi-quantitative. In an effort to quantify sulfide oxidation, Blowes and Jambor
(1990) have developed a Sulfide Alteration Index tailored to the oxidation of mine wastes. Although it is
objective it serves to put into relative terms the degree of oxidation occurring or having occurred at one
site and give an indication of the progression and remaining oxidation of a particular waste as it is easily
adapted to specific site mineralogy. The index (developed initially for the Waite Amulet Tailings, Quebec)
is reproduced below.
Numerical
Scale
10
8-7
6-2
1-0
A second criticism of petrological characterization of minerals is that it is relatively abstruse to the majority
of people studying in this field. The following photomicrographs (1-9) and their corresponding descriptions
and interpretations have been included as examples of sulfide oxidation and dissolution of neutralizing
minerals from various sites throughout North America.
Photomicrograph 7: Element x-ray maps of the same pseudomorph (field of view=300 microns).
The x-ray maps allow for non-destructive, semi-quantitative analysis of the chemistry of alteration
products.
These mineralogical "tools" , although documenting a snapshot in time, illustrate clearly that alteration of
sulfides is a progressive process with complex mineralogical changes occurring throughout and various
intermediate phases dominating different stages. The above grain would be classified on the S.A.I. given
above as a 9 or 10, depending on the alteration of other sulfides in the sample. If this grain was typical of
an entire site, it may suggest that the rate of oxidation, and therefore acid generation, would be slowing.
This conclusion could affect the selection of particular control technologies or closure requirements. For
example, the selection of a complex tailings cover to prevent oxygen infiltration as a means of controlling
sulfide oxidation at a site where the sulfides were typical of the above example may not be appropriate.
Other predictive tools that are commonly used include the acid-base-accounting (ABA) tests and other
static and kinetic laboratory procedures. Interpretation of these results is critical and as proven more than
once, very site specific. One of the issues most difficult to interpret is the neutralization potential (NP) of
the ABA test. Carbonates play a dominant role in acid neutralization, but other minerals, depending on pH
conditions, can contribute to NP. Plagioclase feldspar and biotite are two such minerals as seen in the two
photomicrographs (8 and 9) presented below.
indicating alteration to vermiculite. Similar results were reported by Jambor (1994). This grain, as was
seen with the plagioclase in Fig. 8. is also coated with a secondary phase, likely an iron-oxyhydroxide.
The identification of secondary alteration products also plays an important role in the prediction of pore
water quality. Geochemical equilibrium speciation models, such as MINTEQA2 (Allison et al., 1991), are
frequently used for these predictions. Pore water chemistry is dependent on the solubility constraints of
the minerals through which the pore water migrates. Therefore, minerals identified during mineralogical
characterization, in particular the secondary alteration products and carbonates, can be used in
geochemical models as constraints and controls on the predicted pore water chemistry.
The contents of this web page are protected by copyright law. Please contact
the authors for permission to re-use the contained information.
REFERENCES
Allison, J.D., Brown, D.S., and Novo-Grada, K.J. (1991), MINTEQA2/PRODEFA2, A Geochemical
Assessment Model for Environmental Systems, version 3.0, EPA/600/3-91/021, 1991, Office of Research
and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.
Blowes, D.W. and Jambor, J.L. (1990), The Pore-water Geochemistry and the Mineralogy of the Vadose
Zone of Sulfide Tailings, Waite Amulet, Quebec, Canada., Applied Geochemistry, vol. 5, pp. 327-346.
Clarke, D. (1993), NewPet for DOS, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St.
John's, NF.
Cross, W., Iddings, J.P., Pirsson, L.V. and Washington, H.S. (1902), A Quantitative Chemicomineralogical
Classification and Nomenclature of Igneous Rocks, Journal of Geology, v10, p555-690.
Jambor, J.L. (1994), Mineralogy of Sulfide-rich Tailings and Their Oxidation Products., in Environmental
Geochemistry of Sulfide Mine-wastes, Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course Vol. 22., pp. 59102.
Jambor, J.L. and Blowes, D.W. (1998), Theory and Application of Mineralogy in Environmental Studies of
Sulfide-Bearing Mine Wastes, in Modern Approaches to Ore and Environmental Mineralogy (Cabri, L.J.
and Vaughan, D.J., Eds.), Mineralogical Association of Canada Short Course Vol. 27, p367-402..
Jones, M.P. and Fleming, M.G. (1965), Identification of Mineral Grains, Elsevier, London, 102p.
Kwong, Y.T.J. and Ferguson, K.D. (1997), Mineralogical Changes during NP Determinations and their
Implications, Proc. 4th International Conference on Acid Rock Drainage, Vancouver, BC, p435-447.
Lawrence, R.W. and Sheske, M. (1997), A Method to Calculate the Neutralization Potential of Mining
Wastes, Environmental Geology, v32, p100-106.
McCrone, W.C., McCrone, L.B. and Delly, J.G. (1979), Polarized Light Microscopy, Ann Arbor Science
Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 251p.
Mills, C. (1985), Specific Gravity Fractionation and Testing with Heavy Liquids, in SME Mineral
Processing Handbook, American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers, New York,
30:44-52.
Mills, C. (1978), Mineralogy and Heavy Liquid Analysis in Gravity Separation, Short Course on Gravity
Concentration Technology, University of Nevada, Reno, October, 25p.
Paktunc, A.D. (1998a), Characterization of Mine Wastes for the Prediction of Acid Mine Drainage, in
Environmental Impacts of Mining Activities - Emphasis on Mitigation and Remedial Measures (Azcue,
J.M., Ed.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin (in print).
Paktunc, A.D. (1998b), MODAN: An Interactive Computer Program for Estimating Mineral Quantities
based on Bulk Composition, Computers & Geosciences, v24, n5, p425-431.
Paktunc, A.D. (1998c), Discussion of A Method to Calculate the Neutralization Potential of Mining Wastes,
Lawrence, R.W. and Sheske, M., Environmental Geology (in print)
Ritchie, A.I.M. (1994), The Waste-rock Environment, in Environmental Geochemistry of Sulfide Minewastes, Mineralogical Association of Canada Shortcourse Handbook (J.L. Jambor and D.W. Blowes,
eds.), vol. 22, pp. 133-161.
INTRODUCTION
It is recommended that the thin section or the cut and polished surface of the
hand specimen be etched with diluted HC1 acid before staining. Diluted acetic acid or
formic acid may also be used in place of HC1 acid (Williams, Turner, Gilbert, 1954).
Different carbonate minerals in a rock specimen, immersed in an appropriate HC1
solution for an appropriate period of time, wili show -different reactions. When this
specimen, after being thoroughly washed with distilled water, is inspected under a
binocular or polarizing microscope, the textural and mineralogic features of carbonate
minerals may be observed in detail. In Table 1, acid densities and the periods of
time for each test employed by various workers are indicated. However, it will be
more appropriate to determine the exact acid density and the duration of test, according
to the lithological characteristics of each specimen to be tested. All acid solutions shown
in Table 1 have been used cold (at room temperature). However, Warne (1962) points
out that in tests carried out with cold acid solutions, calcite, aragonite and witherite
fizzes quickly, rhodochrosite, ankerite, cerussite, smithsonite and strontianite show a
weak fizzing, whereas siderite, dolomite and magnesite do not react at all. He suggests
that minerals that show a weak reaction should be treated with warm HC1 acid for
about 30 seconds to 1 minute.
STAINING METHODS
time. Once again it is rinsed and dried. While calcite becomes black, no color change
will be observed in dolomite.
II. 2 - Lemberg test
This test was first described by Lemberg (1887) and slightly modified later by
Steidtmann (1917) (Rodgers, 1940).
Solution. 4 gr AlC13 and 6 gr logwood chips are boiled in 60 cc distilled
water for 20-25 minutes. The amount of loss due to evaporation is replaced by the
addition of some more distilled water. After cooling the solution is filtered and kept
in a bottle.
Steidtmann, slightly modifying the formula, has used 6 gr of logwood spirit
(hematoxilin) instead of logwood chips and has diluted the solution with 1200 cc
distilled water before making the tests (Rodgers, 1940).
CHEMICAL STAINING METHODS OF CARBONATE MINERALS 137
Test.The specimen is kept immersed in the solution for about 5-10 minutes.
Result. During this time calcite acquires a purple color as opposed to
dolomite, which does not change color within the first 20 minutes. However, after 20
minutes, dolomite turns into pale blue (Rodgers, 1940; Twenhofel and Tyler, 1941).
The outstanding disadvantages of this test are the instability of the solution and the
ease of scratching and flaking of the acquired color.
II. 3 - Fairbanks test
This test was first described by Lemberg. (1892) for the discrimination between
calcium minerals and magnesium minerals. Some details of this test have been given
later by Rodgers (1940) (Friedman, 1959).
Solution. 10 % silver nitrate (AgNO3) and potassium chromate (K2CrO4).
Test. Specimen is soaked in silver nitrate solution at a temperature of
60-70 C for about 2-5 minutes (Rodgers, 1940; Twenhofen and Tyler, 1941;
Friedman, 1959). After washing with distilled water, the specimen is immersed in
potassium chromate solution for about 1 minute.
Result. Calcite and aragonite acquire a chocolate or red-brown color, while
dolomite and magnesite do not show any change in color.
II. 5 - Copper nitrate test
This test was first described by Hinden (1903) as a means of identification of
calcite by the use of FeCl3. Mahler (1906) and Spangenberg (1913), who also worked
on this subject, have considered it more suitable to use copper salts [CuSO 4 or Cu (NO3)2],
instead of FeCl3. Lately, Rodgers (1940) has further developed this test and has given
some more details, which have bearing on the results of the test, such as duration of
test, density of the solution, degree of acidity, temperature and the calcite percentage
of the specimen tested.
Solution- Copper nitrate molar solution. Prepared by mixing 188 gr of
Cu (NO3)2, 225 gr of Cu(NO3)2 . 3H2O or, 332 gr Cu (NO3)2 . 6H2O and 1000
gr distilled water. In addition there should be a sufficient amount of NH4OH
available.
Test. Specimen is soaked in copper nitrate molar solution for about 5-6
hours. Care must be taken that the particular surface of the specimen to be stained
should not be in contact with the walls of the vessel containing the solution, and also
that no bubbles should accumulate on this surface. After the treatment, the specimen
is washed. dried and immersed in NH4OH solution for a few seconds. Once again the
specimen is washed carefully.
Result. Calcite acquires a green or bluish-green color, while dolomite does
not show any change in color (Rodgers, 1940).
II. 6 - Trypan blue test
Solution- There are two different sets of formula available (Friedman, 1959).
a) 10 gr of potassium aluminium sulphate [KA1 (SO4)2 . 12H2O] is dissolved in
100 cc of warm water and this solution is mixed with the solution obtained by dissolving
0.25 gr trypan blue in 5-8 cc methanol. Also 8 cc of 10 % HC1 is added.
b) Preparation of the other solution is much easier : 6 cc of 10 % HC1 is added
to the solution obtained by dissolving 0.1-0.2 gr of trypan blue.
Test- Specimen is soaked in the solution for an unspecified period of time.
Result. As a result of this test, both calcite and dolomite acquire colors.
Color of calcite becomes dark blue, while dolomite becomes pale blue
II. 7 - Harris hematoxilin test
Solution. Harris hematoxilin may be either obtained commercially in a
ready-made form or prepared in the following way as described by Gurr (1956): 5 cc
of hematoxilin (C16H14O6) solution (10 % hematoxilin in pure alcohol) and 100 ml of
potassium aluminium sulphate solution are mixed and heated. When the mixture reaches
boiling point, 0,25 gr of mercury oxide (HgO) is added. Heating is stopped when the
color of the solution becomes dark lilac. After cooling, 4 ml of acetic acid (CH 3.COOH)
is added to the solution.
For the test, a mixture of 50 cc Harris hematoxilin solution and 3 cc 10 %
HC1 is used. Hematoxilin bottle must be well shaken before use.
Test. Specimen to be inspected is soaked in the solution for 3-10 minutes.
With freshly prepared solutions the results are obtained in 9-10 minutes. When the
solution is re-used, the test duration must not exceed 3 minutes.
Result. Color of calcite changes to lilac, while there is no corresponding
color change in dolomite (Friedman, 1959).
II. 8 - Alizarin red test
Alizarin red was first used by Huegi (1945) to discriminate between ankerite
and siderite. Later, Friedman (1959) has succesfully applied this technique to other
caibonate minerals Warne (1962), Evamy (1963) and Dickson (1965) have all contributed
to the development of this test.
Solution. According to Friedman, the solution is obtained by dissolving
0.1 gr of alizarin red [sodium alizarin sulphonate = CO.C6H4.CO.C6H (OH)2.SO3 Na
+ H2O] in 100 ml of 0.2% cold HG1. 0.2 % HC1 can be prepared by adding 2ml
conc. HC1 to 998 ml distilled water.
CHEMICAL STAINING METHODS OF CARBONATE MINERALS 139
red.
Dickson has slightly altered formula by dissolving 0.2 gr of alizarin red in
100 cc of 1.5 % cold HCl.
Tests carried out by the author were made with a solution obtained by dissolving
0.1 gr of alizarin red in 100 cc 2 % cold HC1.
Test. Previously etched and washed specimen is soaked in the solution for
a certain period. This period has been determined as 5 minutes by Warne, 2-3 minutes
by Friedman, 1 minute by Evamy, 10-15 seconds by Dickson and as 3 minutes by
the author. Care should be taken that no accumulation of air bubbles occurs on the
surface of the specimen. After the test, specimen is washed lightly with distilled water.
If tap water has to be used, damage due to the pressure of water can be prevented
by holding the opposite side of the specimen of thin section against the water.
Result. Color of calcite will turn into red-brown, whereas dolomite will not
be affected (Friedman).
Evamy states that calcite and ferrocalcite will be colored red, while no change
will take place in the color of dolomite, ferrodolomite and ankerice.
Dickson states that calcite and ferrocalcite will acquire a color between pink
and red, whereas dolomite and ferrodolomite will acquire no color.
According to the observations made by the author, calcite and ferrocalcite acquire
a color between light and dark-pinkish red, as opposed to dolomite and ferrodolomite
which do not acquire any color at all.
According to Warne, as a result of this test calcite, abundant magnesium-bearing
calcite, aragonite and witherite acquire a dark red color, while ankerite, ferrodolomite,
strontianite and cerussite acquire a lilac color. On the other hand, the colors of siderite,
dolomite, rhodochrosite, magnesite and smithsonite are not affected at all.
II. 9 - Friedman test
This test has been described by Friedman (1959).
Solution. 0.2 gr of an organic dye (titan yellow, eosin Y, Congo red, alizarin
red, etc. may be used) is boiled in 25 cc methanol, while 15 cc of 30 % sodium
hyroxide (30 gr NaOH + 70 cc distilled water) are added.
Test- Specimen is soaked in boiling solution for about 5-10 minutes.
Result. Dolomite acquires a color depending on the organic dye used. Thus,
with :
Titan yellow dark orange-red
Eosin Y - dark pink
Congo red red
Alizarin red lilac
Faded colors may be restored back by reheating the specimen with diluted
NaOH.
140 Tamer AY AN
II. 10 - Potassium ferricyanide test
Lemberg has first used potassium ferricyanide [K 3Fe (CN)6] in determining FeS
in the hydroxide test. The same compound was used by Krech (1909) for the staining
of Fe++ in dolomite. Later it was used by Heegel (1913) for discriminating between
dolomite and calcite, according to their iron content. Also Rodgers (1940), Twenhofel
and-Tyler (1941), Friedman (1959), Warne (1962) and Evamy (1963) have all contributed
to the development of this test.
Solution It can be prepared in different ways according to different
workers:
Krech has obtained his solution by acidizing freshly prepared potassium ferricyanide
solution by the addition of one or two drops of HC1.
Heeger has mixed a couple of drops of potassium ferricyanide with diluted HC1.
Henbest (1913) has added 10 parts of K3Fe(CN)6 to 2 parts of concentrated
HC1 and 88 parts of distilled water.
Twenhofel and Tyler have added one or two drops of potassium ferricyanide
to diluted hydrochloric acid (1 part conc. HCl+100 parts of distilled water).
Friedman recommends that the solution - be prepared by adding one or two
drops of potassium ferricyanide to diluted HG1 (1:50 - 100).
Warne has considered it best to use a solution obtained by mixing equal parts
of 2 % HC1 acid and potassium ferricyanide (0.01 gr K3Fe(CN)6 + 100 ml distilled
water).
Evamy has used a mixture of 0.2 % HC1 and 0.5-1.0 % potassium ferricyanide.
In tests made by the author this mixture was prepared by adding 2 cc of
concentrated HCl and 98 cc distilled water into the solution of 2 gr of potassium
ferricyanide in 100 cc of water. However, since the solution is not stable, it should be
used up within one or two days. Otherwise it changes into HCN and acquires a dark
color.
color only after treatment with a warm solution. During heating tests change of color
occurs in siderite earlier than in dolomite.
Evamy reports that ferrocalcite, ferrodolomite and ankerite acquire a light or
dark blue color (depending on the amount of Fe++ component), while neither pure
calcite nor pure dolomite will show any change of color.
In tests carried out by the author, ferrodolomite and ferrocalcite have acquired
a blue color, while no change appeared in pure calcite and pure dolomite. The degree
of darkness of blue is proportional to the iron content of the minerals.
II. 11 - Alizarin red and potassium ferricyanide composite test
This test is used for discriminating between four different types of carbonates
(calcite, ferrocalcite, dolomite and ferrodolomite) in a single series of operation. The
test and results were described by Evamy (1963) and Dickson (1965).
Solution. Evamy has obtained the solution by mixing 0.2 % HC1, 0.2 %
alizarin red, and 0.5-1.0 % potassium ferricyanide.
According to Dickson, two solutions are prepared separately :
a) Alizarin red solution: This solution is obtained by dissolving 0.2 gr of
alizarin red in 100 cc of 1.5% hydrochloric acid (98.5 cc distilled water + 1.5 cc
concentrated HC1).
b) Potassium ferricyanide solution : 2 gr of potassium ferricyanide is dissolved
in 100 cc 1.5 % HC1.
The mixed solution, to be used in the test, is prepared by mixing 3 parts of
alizarin red solution and 2 parts of potassium ferricyanide solution.
Solutions for the tests carried out by the author have been prepared in the
following way :
a) 0.1 gr of alizarin red is dissolved in 100 cc of 2 % HC1.
b) To the mixture of 2 gr of potassium ferricyanide and 100 cc distilled
water, 100 cc of 2 % HCl is added.
These two solutions are mixed in equal parts for obtaining the mixed solution
to be used in the test.
Test Specimen is soaked in cold solution for 3 minutes (according to the
author). Evamy considers 1 minute as sufficient, while according to Dickson a period
of 30-45 seconds is adequate. After the test, specimen is carefully washed and dried.
Kesults- According to Evamy, the results of the test are as follows :
Calcite : Red.
Ferrocalcite, (low ferrous iron content) : lilac red dominant.
Ferrocalcite (high ferrous iron content) : scarlet blue dominat.
Dolomite: no coloring.
Ferrodolomite: pale blue.
Ankerite: dark blue.
142 Tamer AYAN
This test was described by Ramsden (1954) for the discrimination between
calcite and dolomite.
Solution It is prepared by dissolving 2.5-3.0 gr of A1C13 and 1 gr methyl
red in 1000 cc of warm water. This is a stable solution.
Test In a small beaker, 2 parts of solution are mixed with one part of
powdered specimen.
CHEMICAL STAINING METHODS OF CARBONATE MINERALS 143
boreholes. Also, some of the more easily preparable and relatively stable solutions can
be easily carried by the field geologist in strong bottles. Simple tests carried out in the
field may enable the field geologist to recognize his lithological boundaries or important
marker horizons in sedimentaryespecially carbonateareas. Thus, the geologist may
have some idea about the lithological and mineralogical details on his maps and
sections, even before final chemical analyses and sedimentary petrographic determinations
are concluded.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
BISSEL, H. J (1957) : Combined preferential staining and cellulose peel technique. Journal of Sedimentary
Petrography, v. 27, pp. 417-420.
BRITISH DRUG HOUSE LTD. (1946) : The B. D. H. book of organic reagents for analytical use.
The British Drug House Ltd., B.D.H. Laboratory Chemicals Group, Poole, Dorset, 196 p.
DICKSON, J. A. D. (1965) : A modified technique for carbonates in thin section. Nature, v. 205, no.
4971, p. 587.
EVAMY, B. D. (1963) : The application of a chemical staining technique to a study of dedolomitisation.
Sedimentology, v. 2, pp. 164-170.
FAIRBANKS, E. E. (1925) : A modification of Lemberg's staining method. American Mineralogist, v.
10, pp. 126-127.
FEIGL, F. (1937) : Qualitative analysis by spot tests Nordemann Publishing Company, p. 400, New York.
(1947) : Qualitative analysis by spot tests, III. Edition, Elsevier Publishing Company, New York.
(1954) : Spot tests, V. I. Elsevier Publishing Company, London, p. 518.
FRIEDMAN, G. M. (1959) : Identification of carbonate minerals by staining methods. Journal of Sedimentary
Petrology, v. 29, pp. 87-97.
HALLIMOND, A. F. (1925) : Iron ores : bedded ores of England and Wales. Petrography and chemistry.
Mem. Geol. Survey, Min. Resources, v. 29, p. .111.
HAMBL1N, Wm.K. (1962) : Staining and etching techniques for studying obscure structures in clastic
rocks. Journal of Sedimentary Petrography, v. 32, pp. 530-533.
HEEGER, W. (1913) : ber die mikrochemische -Untersuchung fein verteilter Karbonate im Gesteinsschliff.
Centeralbl. f. Min., pp. 44-51.
HENBEST, L.G. (1931): The use of selective stains in paleontology. Journal of Paleontology, v. 5, pp.
355-364.
146 Tamer AYAN
HINDEN, F. (1903) : Neue Reaktionen zur Unterscheidung von Calcit und Dolomit. Verh. Naturf. Ges.
Basel, v. 15, no. 2, p. 201.
(1913) : Centralblatt fr Min. Geol. und Palaont., p. 44.
HOBBS, C.R.B.,Jr. (1954) : Staining methods for differentiating limestones and dofomites. Virginia Journal
of Science, v. 5, no. 4.
(1955) : Geological Abstracts, v. 3, no. 2, pp. 126-127.
HOGBERG, E. (1950) : Staining methods for examination of carbonate rocks in the field. Geol. Foren.i.
Stockholm Forh., v. 72, pp. 348-358.
HOLMES, A. (1921) : Petrographic methods and calculations. Thomas Murby Comp., London.
HUEGI, Th (1945) : Gesteinbildend wichtige Karbonate und deren Nachweis mittels Farbmethoden.
Schweizerische Mineralog. und Petrographische Mitteilungen, v. 25, pp. 114-140.
IVES (1955) : Evaluation of acid etching of limestone. Kansas Geol. Sur. Bull. 114, pt. 1.
JIROVA, D. (1956) : Modifications of CaCO3 in the shells of Foraminifera. Casopis mineral, geol, v.l,
pp. 101-104.
KELLER, W. D. & MOORE, G.E. (1937) : Staining drill cuttings for calcite-dolomite differentiation.
Am. Assoc. Pet Geol. Bull., v. 21, pp. 949, 951.
KIRCHBERG, H. (1940) : Die Bestimmung des Ankerites in Spateisenerzen. Berg- und Huettenmannische
Monatshefte, v. 88, pp. 73-77.
(1941) : ber Feinbauuntersuchungen an Eisenerzen. Metal und Erz, v. 38, pp. 361-365.
KRAUS, HUNT & RAMSDELL (1951) : Mineralogy. McGraw-Hill Book Comp., pp. 225-226.
KRECH (1909) ; Jahrbuch der kniglichen preussischen geologischen Landesanstalt, I, p. 68.
LEMBERG. J. (1887) : Zur mikrochemischen Untersuchung von Calcit, Dolomit und Predazzit. Zeitschrift
der deutschen geologischen Gesellschaft, v. 39, pp. 489-492.
(1888) : Zur mikrochemischen Untersuchung von Calcit, Dolomit und Predazzit. Zeitschrift der
deutschen geologischen Gesellschaft, v. 40, pp. 357-359.
(1892) : Zur microchemischen Untersuchung einiger Minerale. Zeitschrift der deutschen geologisihen
Gesellschaft, v. 44, pp. 224.242.
LEITMEIER, H. & FEIGL, F. (1930) : Der Nachweis von Magnesium in Mineralien. Tscherm. Min.
Petr. Mitt., v. 40, pp 325-334.
LEROY, L.W. (1950) : Stain analysis : Subsurface geologic methods. Colorado School of Mines, Golden,
Colo., pp. 193-199.
MAHLER, O. (1906) : ber das chemische Verhalten von Dolomit und Kalkspath. Freiburg.
MANN, V.I. (1955) : A spot test for dolomitic limestones. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 25, pp.
58-59.
MEIGEN, W. (1901) : Eine einfach Rraktion zur Unterscheidung von Aragonit und Kalkspath. Centralb.
fur Min. Geol. und Paldont., pp. 577-578.
RAMSDEN, R.M. (1954) : A colour test for distinguishing limestone and dolomite. Journal of Sedimentary
Petrology, v. 24, p. 282.
RODGERS, J. (1940) : Distinction between calcite and dolomite on polished surfaces. American Journal
of Science, v. 238, pp. 788-798.
RUDI, D. I. (1954) : Method for investigating (research) the composition of carbonate rocks by means
of stains. Miner. Sbornik Lvov Geol. Soc., no. 8, pp, 295-296.
SPANGENBERG, K. (1913) : Die kunstliche Darstellung des Dolomites. Zeitschrift fr Krystall. u. Min.,
v. 52, pp. 529-567.
STEIDTMANN, E. (1917) : Origin of dolomite as disclosed by stains and other methods. Geol. Soc. Am.
Bull, v. 28, pp. 431-450.
TAYLOR, J. H. (1949; : Petrology of the Sand Ironstone formation. Mem. Geol. Survey Great Britain,
VI, p. III.
CHEMICAL STAINING METHODS OF CARBONATE MINERALS 147
TOGARI, K. & TOGARI, S. (1955) : Conditions controlling the crystal form of calcium carbonate
minerals (I). Jour. Fac. Sci., Hokkaido Uni., Geol. and Min., v. 9, pp. 55-60.
TWENHOFEL, W.H. & TYLER, S.A. (1941) : Methods of study of sediments. McGraw-Hill Book
Comp., London, pp. 128-131.
VOGEL, A.I. (1945) : A textbook of qualitative analysis including semimicro qualitative analysis: III.
Edition. Longmans-Green and Comp., London, p. 578.
WARNE, S. St.J. (1962) : A quick field or laboratory staining scheme for the differentiation of the major
carbonate minerals. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 32, pp. 29-38.
WELCHER, F. J. (1948) : Organic analytical reagents. D. Van Nostrand Comp., v. 4, p. 624.
WILLIAMS, TURNER & GILBERT (1954) : Petrography. Freeman Comp., pp. 335-337.
WOLF, K.H. & WARNE, S. St.J. (1960) : Remarks on the application of Friedman's staining methods.
Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 30, pp. 496-497.
4. Scribd
Explore
Community
Upload a Document
Search Books, Presentations, Business, Academics...
Login
http://w w w .scrib
Sign Up
Log In
http://w w w .scrib
/ 22
Search coming
4gen
<a title=
XIAMETER Silicones
Buy chemical business online.
Save your time. Find out more!
www.xiameter.com/chemical+business
Some of them are restricted difficult to obtain. (A good relationship with a high
school or college chemistry instructor helps there.) They really need to be lab grade.
Industrial grade hydrochloric acid (aka mureatic acid) might be fine for cleaning
specimens. But it is not a testing lab chemical. Ditto the sulfuric acid that is used in
car batteries. And other industrial chemicals that arent lab grade. You substitute such
inferior chemicals at the risk of screwing up tests. If you stick to lab grade chemicals,
youll be able to trust the results with a much higher degree of confidence. Honest!
Most of what you will need is available from chemical supply houses. If you do not
live in an urban area where one of these is handy, some pharmacies will order things
for you though not restricted chemicals. Again, a local chemistry instructor is your
best bet for those. Get to know one, gain their respect - and their understanding of
what you are doing. They can help you in a lot of ways safety, chemicals and
labware, protocols and procedures, and tests that might not get mentioned here. (I
cant think of a good reason NOT to strike up a relationship with a chemistry
instructor if you want to get into the chemical testing of minerals Even if the
nearest school is an hour away.)
A BASIC APPROACH TO TESTING
Think small! It doesnt take a beaker full of HCl to dissolve a tiny pinch of powdered
mineral. And you dont need a pound or two of powdered mineral to do the testing.
Work in small batches pinches of powders and drops of liquids. Work in the flat
glass dish under your microscope, placing the powders and liquids on a glass
microscope slide (those with depressions ground in them work best keeping the
drops where you put them) for ease of cleanup and positioning, and use the scope to
observe reactions. While not all tests require this, most can be done this way. Even
when you dont work under the scope, thinking small is still a good idea minimal
amounts in the bottom of a test tube. Its cheaper, it should be safer, and it should be
easier to mix the solutions youll need get the strengths youll need. Besides, with a
lot of mineral testing you probably wont have much pure mystery mineral to work
with. Maybe just a tiny crystal or two tweezed off its matrix. If you start out learning
to work in small amounts, you wont get caught short when you run into this situation
which will be quite often.
Be methodical. And take notes. Working helter-skelter gets helter-skelter results. And
often a miss instead of a hit. And if you dont take notes you may not remember
exactly what you did to get the results you got good or bad. Its nice to be able to
repeat the good tests avoid the bad ones. Notes help guide you in that direction.
Keep them to refer back to the next time you test something. It might be a year
between doing certain tests for certain things and those notes will be worth their
weight in gold as reminders.
There are basically two broad categories into which tests fall: Qualitative and
quantitative. Qualitative tests tell you whether or not a certain element, radical, or
compound is present in your mystery mineral. Quantitative tests tell you how much of
that constituent is present weight percents or mole percents of various elements or
oxides of elements, etc. Quantitative tests are rather tricky or at least reliable ones
are. They are advanced mineral chemistry. Well stick to qualitative tests for this
basic introduction to home lab work, with maybe some hints on rough quantitative
measurements now and then. Youre interested in seeing what the mystery mineral
contains, not how much of it or how pure the sample is. At least that should be the
focus when you start out. Any quantitative hints that get discussed will serve to point
out that there is that next level of chemistry available when you feel up to moving
on.
In qualitative testing the goal is to find out whether or not certain constituents are in the mystery
mineral. If you suspect a calcium-bearing mineral, you test to see if there really is calcium present.
And so on. Most of the tests well discuss here are of that type. Is it or isnt it present? Negative
results are as important as positive ones. They tell you what isnt present. So you can move on to find
out what is.
METHODOLOGY & THOROUGHNESS
You dont need a home lab to identify minerals that can be identified from gross
physical features such as quartz, kyanite, and muscovite (usually) Save the lab
work for stuff that is defying identification by simpler means. Except its not a bad
idea to experiment on knowns see if you can prove a pyrite sample is pyrite by
chemical testing. Same with other species you are familiar with. The practice will
familiarize you with testing procedures, give you experience working with the
chemicals, and give you some confidence once you get things worked out and are
proving the samples are what you know they are. But, by-and-large, save the lab
work for the tough ones.
As stated in the previous post, lab tests are all about finding out whats in your
mystery mineral(s). You narrow down the possibilities to two or a few species, and
then you say Okay now what are the chemical differences between these species
that I can test for to figure out which I have? Lets take a simple example: You have
a sample that youve narrowed down to being one of the following species: calcite,
magnesite, siderite, or smithsonite. Normally, figuring out the specific gravity of the
mineral would tell you which you have but your sample is small crystals, nothing
big enough for you to work with on the triple beam balance (or whatever you use to
do S.G. tests.) So you look these species up and find that calcite is CaCO3, magnesite
is MgCO3, siderite is FeCO3, and smithsonite is ZnCO3. The only difference between
these species is their metallic ion: Ca, Mg, Fe and Zn. So the way to find out which
species you have is to test for those ions find out which is present. You therefore
need a chemical test that will identify Ca, another that will identify Mg, and so on
A simple chemical test for Ca is to dissolve a pinch of the powdered sample in a drop
or two of hydrochloric acid (HCl) and then add sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) to the
solution. If you get a white precipitate (its CaSO4) there is Ca in the sample. Its
probably calcite. BUT a single test is not conclusive. Any of these minerals may
have Ca in them in small amounts as a substitution for the principal metallic ion.
(We get the ideal formulas fed to us in books not actual formulas.) So you
would still need to test further. You can test for Mg by dissolving a pinch of the
powdered mineral in HCl and adding several drops of a strong solution of ammonia to
it. Then add a bit of Na2HPO4.12H2O to the solution. If you get a white precipitate
(its NH4MgPO4) then there is Mg in the sample. To test for Fe you could use any of
several test. One simple one is to dissolve a pinch of the powdered sample in a drop or
two of HCl and then add several drops of ammonia hydroxide (NH4OH) solution to it
to make it alkaline. If you get a tannish to white precipitate (its Fe(OH)3 ) then there
is Fe in the sample. Then, for Zn, dissolve a pinch of powdered sample in HCl and
add sodium disulfide (Na2S) solution if you get a white precipitate (its ZnS) theres
Zn in the sample.
As you do each test, observe the volume of precipitate formed keep adding the
reagent to the solution (in tiny amounts) until no more reaction is taking place, no
more precipitate forming. (If you keep the slides (or test tubes) of each solution lined
up on the table, when all the tests are done you can compare the solutions with one
another directly if necessary.) Note any negative results such as no Mg found. Those
eliminate species from your list of likely suspects. Lets say you got negatives for
Ca and Mg, positives for Fe and Zn. But the Zn test barely showed a trace, while the
Fe test showed the sample is loaded with Fe. Youre mystery mineral is no longer a
mystery its siderite with a little bit of Zn substituting for the Fe. Actual formula:
(Fe,Zn)CO3. Ideal formula: FeCO3. [And here weve looked at rough quantitative
testing: How much? As opposed to Is it there?]
Aha! Someone says. But how do you know it is an iron *carbonate*? not a
sulfate or something else? Well I said youd already decided it had to be on of the
carbonates named. And you probably did that be testing a sample or two with HCl to
see if it fizzed. And it did Which is another chemical test a simple test for CO2
(which is what comes bubbling out of a solution of carbonate mineral and acid.) See
you already knew one chemical test and didnt even realize it! If you didnt do that
test, and decided it must be one of those carbonates by other means, then that test
needs to be done to prove your guess is correct. Because without knowing for sure
that the mineral is a carbonate, it may well be something else, like a sulfate. (Actually,
if you think about it, you proved the mineral to be a carbonate as you dissolved the
powder in acid because it bubbled as it dissolved PS: The sulfates of Fe, Mg and
Zn are readily soluble in acids and likely to stay dissolved not precipitate out of
solution. Another reason youd know the mineral was a carbonate not a sulfate - in
the above scenario.)
You have to test for EACH of the suspected constituents in a mineral not just one.
Which can be tricky if you only have a little bit of powdered mineral to work with and
need to do a bunch of tests. Here the minimalist approach I recommend becomes
critical else you may not be able to do all the tests needed. It is always a good idea
to figure out how many tests you are going to need to do and then divide up the
available mineral powder solution into that many batches. In some cases this may
mean that all you have to work with are a drop or two of solution for each test. A
micro-eyedropper is handy for working with tiny amounts of solutions and youll
probably need to work under the microscope in order to see the reactions in the tiny
drops of solutions you have. But it can be done. You can also divide up the mineral
powder into tiny piles ahead of time and then make the solutions you need from
them. This is handy if you need different powder solutions for different tests. But it
can be tough to do with tiny quantities of powder possibly ending up with just a few
grains of powder to make solutions from.
Of course not all tests are as simple as the series described above. Or all results as
certain as our hypothetical case. I picked an easy one to illustrate the methodology.
And to point out that you cant just test for one thing and if its positive say
Voila! You cant. You have to take other possibilities besides your prime suspect
into consideration. In the above case, if youd just tested for Zn you would have
falsely concluded the mineral was smithsonite Chemical testing is about proving
your case beyond a reasonable doubt. Any single test is more than likely to leave
plenty of room for doubt. Conclusive results come from being thorough testing for
all possible culprits and finding out which you have, and which is the most likely
prime candidate based on comparisons.
LAB PROCEDURES & TIPS
MAKING SOLUTIONS
Nearly all of the tests require that you first dissolve some of the powdered mystery
mineral to make a solution that is then used for testing. This can be a problem in itself:
What do you use to dissolve the powder? (And here we are talking about *dissolving*
the powder not just mixing it in liquid. In a mixture, the powder is not dissolved,
just stirred in and floating around. In a solution the powder has been dissolved
broken up into its constituent ions.)
Only a few minerals are soluble in water mostly halides and iodides. (Which can be
a quick test to see if you have one of those species.) But the odds are that your powder
wont dissolve in water youll have to try something else. Try hydrochloric acid
(HCl) first. A great many minerals will dissolve in HCl. If that doesnt work, try nitric
acid (HNO3). If that doesnt work, try sulfuric acid (H2SO4) last. If that doesnt work
the odds are your mystery mineral is a silicate, few of which will dissolve in acids.
Zeolites do, and a few others, but by-and-large silicates are insoluble in anything short
of hydrofluoric acid (HF) and thats one acid you cant play with at home. (Its
extremely dangerous and requires special lab equipment including a negative
pressure ventilation hood to work with safely.) If you run through the list of acids
you can use at home and still cant get the powder to dissolve, youve pretty much
determined the mineral is a silicate and probably not a Zeolite. Important
information in itself.
A few other acids are also used in making solutions, such as acetic and oxalic. But
these are rather weak acids, comparatively speaking (they can still be strong, for
them, and are dangerous.) They are usually not used unless a specific test calls for
them. And if a test does call for one and you cant get the powdered mineral to
dissolve in it, the odds are the mineral is not what you think it is and are testing for:
You can scratch that possibility and move on to other tests.
ACIDITY vs ALKALINITY
Quite a few of the tests require you to start with an acid solution and then make it alkaline by adding
a base, such as ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH). In some cases you simply overload the solution
with the base to get it there. In others you need to work carefully to make the solution just slightly
alkaline.
You use litmus paper for checking the pH of solutions. But since you are working
with such small quantities of liquids, you dont want to just stick the tip of the test
strip in the solution it might wick up your entire batch of liquid! Instead, dip a small
diameter (approx. 2.5 mm) glass rod in the solution and then touch the wetted end of it
to a fresh spot on the litmus paper. The wetted spot on the paper will then tell you
where things stand alkalinity wise.
Also, sometimes (though rarely) you need a neutral solution pH of 7. Which can be tricky to
achieve. You pretty much need to use a micro-eyedropper to slowly add the base and drop by drop
neutralize the acid, testing your solution with a glass rod and litmus paper after each drop has been
added and stopping the first time the litmus paper doesnt turn color.
MAKING A MICRO-EYEDROPPER
You can buy eyedroppers with small diameter ends if you have a good chemical
supply house in your area. But otherwise they can be hard to come by and they
arent really micro eyedroppers. So you might want to try and make your own. Take
an 8 inch length of glass tubing about the same diameter as a typical medicine
eyedropper. Heat the center of it over a propane torch flame until its soft. Then
remove it from the flame and pull on both ends so the middle stretches out. Snap the
middle so there is a roughly 3 inch long thin capillary tube coming off the end of the
unstretched part of the tube. Once the glass has cooled, then heat the wide end of the
tube until its soft and flare it slightly with the tang of a file so it looks roughly like
the top end of a regular medicine dropper. After it cools again, fit the flared end with a
medicine dropper bulb.
Ads by Google
www.sealseastern.com
Alfa Mirage Gold Tester
Test Precious Metals Accurately
LOW Prices ! GK-2000 & GK-300
www.starstruckllc.com
Flame Hardening Machines
Localized Hardening of Your Parts
Lower Cost Choice Over Induction
www.flametreatingsystems.com
Reads:
800
Uploaded:
01/11/2010
Category:
Books - Fiction
Tags:
tests
Gold
chemical
Refining
mineralogy
Rated:
0
false
false
aflacglobal
Follow
Ads by Google
Chemical Etching Supplier
Photo Chemical Machining
Free Photo-Tooling Offered
www.qualitetch.co.uk
Flame Hardening Machines
Localized Hardening of Your Parts
Lower Cost Choice Over Induction
www.flametreatingsystems.com
Global Mining Consultants
Wide Range of Specialist Services
From Exploration to Mine Closure
www.srk.co.uk
Oxygen lancing burners
Reduce energy costs and arc-on
time to improve your EAF process
www.americancombustion.com
Chemical Microscopy
120 Reagents. Follows approach of
Chamot and Mason ( Cornell )
www.Cargille.Com
Width:
Height:
Start on page:
Preview View:
Auto
(auto)
300
Scroll
<a title=
Related
1. 88 p.
59 p.
Overlooked Fortunes
Reads: 920
56 p.
72 p.
Minerals
Reads: 4607
300 p.
47 p.
mp-95-4 wilson
Reads: 917
125 p.
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 332
6 p.
Aure8 InQuartation Gold Refini...
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 359
2. 5 p.
The History Of Touchstone Testi...
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 153
3 p.
Cleaning Laboratory Glassware f...
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 171
14 p.
Gold Recovery From Casting Inve...
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 162
3. 148 p.
Gold Iodine Carbon
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 91
38 p.
CIP Process
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 171
17 p.
Carbon Gold Chloride Patent
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 130
4. 11 p.
ACTIVATED CARBON for Precious M...
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 229
10 p.
Leaching and Recovery of Platin...
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 430
40 p.
Extraction and Scrubber Neutral...
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 622
5. 14 p.
USE OF HYDROMETALLURGY IN DIREC...
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 399
37 p.
Gold Amalgamation
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 428
37 p.
Placer Gold Recovery Methods
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 267
6. 6 p.
Precious Metal Recovery Using U...
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 335
6 p.
Ions Atoms & Charged Particles ...
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 157
5 p.
Inquarting Gold Notes
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 543
7. 5 p.
Touching Precious Metals ( Test...
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 330
9 p.
Liquid Gold
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 737
16 p.
Peroxide Acid Method
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 1,095
8. 6 p.
Gold Content List in CPU Chips
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 2,492
37 p.
Placer Gold Concentration Methods
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 361
26 p.
How to Build and Operate a Mill...
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 2,102
9. 9 p.
4612093 Method and Apparatus fo...
From: aflacglobal
Reads: 582
4gen
Bala Gangadhar Tilak read this 5 days agoLearn more about Readcast.
Kawasiades read this 07 / 09 / 2010Learn more about Readcast.
liuting read this 07 / 06 / 2010Learn more about Readcast.
rasashastra read this 07 / 05 / 2010Learn more about Readcast.
ferakyol read this 06 / 21 / 2010Learn more about Readcast.
Yatindra Dutt read this 06 / 18 / 2010Learn more about Readcast.
legiopatrianostra read this 06 / 15 / 2010Learn more about Readcast.
spolonggoy read this 06 / 13 / 2010Learn more about Readcast.
www.ZenithCrusher.com/Crusher
XIAMETER Silicones
Buy chemical business online.
Save your time. Find out more!
www.xiameter.com/chemical+business
Ore Dressing Equipment
Ore Dressing Equipment, Separator
Sizing Equipment, Conveyor,Deryer
www.china-ball-mill.com
Esperanza Silver Corp.
A Gold Mining Company Focusing
on San Luis & Cerro Jumil
www.esperanzasilver.com
Chemical Resistant Seals
Chemical resistant elastomer seals
for all chemical reagents.
www.sealseastern.com
Alfa Mirage Gold Tester
Test Precious Metals Accurately
LOW Prices ! GK-2000 & GK-300
www.starstruckllc.com
Cabot Position on Coltan
Cabot has not, and will not, mine
tantalum in the Dem. Rep. of Congo.
www.cabot-corp.com/tantalum
Chemical Etching Supplier
Photo Chemical Machining
Free Photo-Tooling Offered
www.qualitetch.co.uk
http://w w w .scrib
http://w w w .scrib
default
Log In
Email address:
Submit
Upload a Document
Search Books, Presentations, Business, Academics...
Scribd
About
Press
Jobs
Contact
Blog
Scribd Store
Legal
Terms - General
Terms - API
Terms - Privacy
Copyright
Getting Started
Community Guidelines
Web Stuff
Partners
Partners / Publishers
Branded Reader
Developers / API
Subscribe to Us
On Scribd
On Twitter
On Facebook
Sign Up
What's New
Branded Reader
Desktop Uploader
scribd. scribd.
5. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
23
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
24
found elsewhere e.g., Hutchinson [1], St. John et al. [2], Ahmed [3-6], ASTM
standards C 295, C
457, C 856, and C 1324 [7-10], French [11], Mielenz [12, 13], Walker [14],
Campbell [15],
Detwiler et al. [16], and Buehler Sum-Met [17]. The present review is mainly
adapted from these
above references, along with the authors own experience on various sample
preparation tips, and
several manufacturers product literature.
MATERIALS AND SAMPLING
Petrography, as the name implies, is a pictorial-based descriptive science
that follows the
principle that a picture is worth a thousand words. Petrography: (a) provides
detailed
compositional, textural, mineralogical, and microstructural properties of a
material including its
detailed characterization and quality assurance, and (b) diagnoses evidences
and causes of
improper behavior, poor performance, or failure to provide satisfactory
performance. Since
photographs provide an excellent documentation of the appearance and
condition of a material,
samples received for petrographic examinations should first be adequately
photographed,
described in detail, and properly documented prior to the subsequent
destructive sample
preparations steps for microscopical examinations. Samples, as received,
should be adequately
representative of the material in question and for the purpose of the
examination. Locations of
25
regolith, soils, and other subbase materials. Due to the opaque, nontransparent nature, asphaltic
materials (except aggregates in asphaltic concrete) have limited applications
in petrography.
A subset of the laboratory sample selected for a specific sample preparation
(e.g.,
grinding, polishing, or thin sectioning) must be representative of the entire
sample to be
examined. Following is a brief description of field sampling strategies for
various materials.
Clinker - In clinker microscopy, various authors practice different sampling
preferences
(e.g., see Campbell [15] for details). Usually, a representative amount is
collected at regular
intervals from the kiln during clinker production, mixed, quartered down to
smaller size,
sometimes crushed, and used for sample preparation. A grab sample is
preferable to composite
samples. Various sample preparation steps including sectioning, grinding,
polishing, staining,
etching, thin sectioning, and half sectioning described in this article are
common in the
microscopy of clinkers and raw feeds.
Cement - For lime, gypsum, portland cement, blended cement, high alumina
cement,
pozzolans, and other special cementitious materials, a representative
amount is selected from the
lot to be analyzed, which upon further quartering is reduced down to a
manageable amount for
appropriate sample preparation. Various modes of petrographic examinations
of cements and
pozzolans include: (a) immersion of a small amount transferred by a needle
to a refractive index
oil on a clean glass slide for examination of individual grains in a
petrographic microscope (oilimmersion
mounts), (b) a small amount of grains sprayed on an epoxy-coated frosted
glass slide
for grain thin section examination in a petrographic microscope, (c)
approximately 10 grams of
the representative sample is encapsulated with epoxy as a binder in a
castable mold to be used
26
Manual [18]. Strategies of condition survey and sampling concrete in the
field are described in
ACI Committee 201[19], ASTM C 823 [20], and C 856 [9]. Water-cooled
diamond-bit coring
using a 1-in. to as large as 12-in. diameter drill bit is common for
petrographic sampling in the
27
Plaster and Gypsum products - For plaster, stone, tile, and floor
underlayments, single or
more preferably, multiple representative samples should be collected and
the petrographer should
choose appropriate pieces for sample preparation and subsequent laboratory
examinations.
Gypsum based plaster or floor underlayments should be collected in dry
conditions and handled
carefully. Portland cement plaster products (stucco), shotcrete, and
swimming pool plasters are
28
petrographer provides many valuable information about the condition of
concrete in the field,
structural integrity, locations, severity and extent of deterioration, and may
even the cause(s) of
failure or poor performance.
A detailed communication between the petrographer and the
engineer/architect about the
project background and service history is necessary. A field survey,
examinations of field
photographs, review of the results of previous testing, and information about
the original mix
design(s) are helpful to determine the total number and locations of
representative samples to be
taken for examination. Adequate communications between client and
petrographer should
ensure that: (a) the samples selected for petrographic examinations are
representative of the
structural unit and field conditions, (b) sample locations were carefully
selected considering the
29
Petrographer should observe the sample as thoroughly as possible and
gather sufficient
information regarding the condition of sample in terms of its integrity,
composition, fabric, and
imprints of any external or internal deterioration processes in the field.
Preliminary laboratory
examinations should be made visually, with the help of a hand (magnifying)
lens, and with a low
power stereomicroscope.
During the visual and low-power stereomicroscopical examinations, multiple
sample
photographs should be taken by using a 35-mm color camera, or a digital
camera with at least 3mega pixel resolutions, and a flatbed scanner. Preliminary examinations
should determine the
areas of interest in the samples and mark locations for subsequent sample
preparation steps.
SAMPLE PREPARATION TECHNIQUES
The primary purpose of sample preparation is to reveal the in-situ
microstructure and
composition of the sample. Care must be exercised in all preparation stages
to avoid any loss or
alteration of the original composition and microstructure. Appropriate sample
preparation
techniques are, therefore, crucial for obtaining maximum and accurate
information. Ability to
observe various minute details in the microstructure depends strongly upon
the sample
preparation procedures. Inadequate preparation may not reveal the details
clearly whereas overpreparation
may lose much of the in-situ information, which is almost always crucial for
interpretation; both can introduce preparation-artifacts that are not related
to the original material
or problem. Depending on the nature and condition of a sample, various
preparation methods
such as epoxy impregnation, sectioning, grinding, polishing, staining,
etching, thin sectioning,
coating, pulverizing, etc. are followed. Brief descriptions of these procedures,
mainly from the
references mentioned in the introduction, are given below.
(1) Cleaning
Cleaning of a hardened concrete core in running tap water removes the dust,
dirt, and
muddy coating of drilling dust that are sometimes present on the cylindrical
surface due to wet
drilling. Such cleaning can highlight: (a) the pristine condition of the sample
after removing the
artifacts from coring; (b) the type of aggregates and their grading and
distribution; (b) large
voids, cracks, joints, and reinforcements; (c) variation in color, density, water
absorption, and
other properties through depth or in a single location in the sample, which
can indicate variation
in the concrete composition; and (d) different layers in a composite core.
Wetting is sometimes
helpful to highlight many fine or wide cracks in a concrete core; cracks
become prominent
during differential drying of concrete between the cracked and uncracked
portions. Exudations
of white alkali-silica reaction gel through the cracks are sometimes distinct
when a core dries out
from its moist condition and contains alkali-silica reactive aggregates. Drying
after cleaning of
concrete and masonry units sometimes reveals soft, white, powdery
efflorescence deposits on the
air-dried surface, which can be characterized by examinations of oilimmersion mounts.
Thorough cleaning of a sample is essential within and between various
sample preparations steps
to wash the debris generate in each step (e.g., cleaning in running water or
in ultrasonic cleaner
in between the steps of sectioning, grinding, polishing, thin sectioning). Soft,
fragile, and watersensitive
materials (e.g., clinker, cement, gypsum based materials), however, should
not be
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
30
cleaned in water, for which non-aqueous isopropyl alcohol, acetone (Ahmed,
[3]), 1,1,1,
trichloroethane (Walker [14]), or other non-aqueous media can be used.
Cleaning, however,
should be done carefully, after knowing its effect on the material being
examined, subsequent
possible alterations, and its effects on the interpretation of the
microstructure.
(2) Fresh Fracturing
31
properties including size, shape, relief, color, interference color,
birefringence, refractive index,
extinction angle, pleochroism, and dispersion staining.
Particle mounts on removable resins or on permanent thin epoxy films
Campbell [15]
mentioned examination of fine clinker grains and cement by immersing small
powders on a
molten Hyrax or Meltmount resin (refractive index 1.70) on a glass slide and
placing a cover
glass before the hardening of the resin. Fine particles (74 to 149-m1)
sprinkled on a glass slide
coated with a thin film of epoxy (where only the bases of the particles are
permanently mounted
in the epoxy) can be examined in a series of refractive index oils with
intermediate washings of
the oils and cover glasses by gentle streams of acetone or xylene, and rinse
with isopropyl
alcohol.
Applications - Oil-immersion mounts are helpful for rapid identifications of:
(a) cement
and clinker phases including their relative abundances and various optical
properties; (b) clinker
raw feeds; (c) secondary deposits in concrete; (d) cement hydration
products, residual cement
particles, degree of cement hydration in the paste, and the type of cement
used; (e) fly ash,
ground granulated blast-furnace slag, other pozzolanic and cementitious
materials, and
microfillers in paste; (f) the presence of hydrated lime, portland cement, and
limestone fines in
mortars and from that the types of mortars (i.e., lime mortar, portland
cement-lime mortar,
masonry cement mortar); (g) efflorescence deposits on masonry walls
(calcium and alkali
sulfates, carbonates, and hydrates); (h) lime and gypsum based products,
and various forms of
gypsum (gypsum, alpha hemihydrate, beta hemihydrate, soluble anhydrite,
and insoluble
anhydrite) and lime (calcitic, dolomitic, hydraulic); (i) various potentially
expansive materials
including alkali-silica reaction gel (e.g., ettringite and gypsum in a concrete
exposed to surface
attack; epezite or epizet and brucite in concrete cracked by delayed
hydration of free lime and
magnesia, respectively); (j) types and mineralogy of aggregates; and (k)
depending on the
situation and the depth of the examination, the overall type, composition,
and characterization of
the material, and the cause of deterioration, if any.
(4) Encapsulation and Vacuum Impregnation
Purpose - Encapsulation and/or impregnation of a sample with a resin,
especially if it is
soft, powdery, cracked, brittle, friable, or broken is helpful to: (a) fill the
voids, pores and cracks;
(b) improve the overall integrity and ease of handling; (c) preserve the
original microstructure
and distribution of components and edges in the sample; (d) keep the
detached, de-bonded,
fragmented portions adhered to the rest of the sample; and (e) prepare a
solid mass of the original
fragmented or powdery sample for sectioning, grinding, thin-sectioning, or
polishing.
Encapsulation indicates immersion of the sample within a resin in a mold to
improve the external
integrity of brittle, friable materials and for better handling for subsequent
sampling steps,
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
32
phenolic or epoxy-based thermosetting resins, or methyl methacrylate-based
thermoplastic
resin), castable mounting method is more common for encapsulating both
metallurgical and
construction materials, where the material is mounted without using a press
in a plastic or metal
mold by using an acrylic or epoxy-based resin and is cured at relatively low
temperatures (except
for the acrylic and some fast-cured epoxy resins, which can generate heat by
exothermic
polymerization reactions as high as the heat generated in the compression
mounting). The term
cold mounting is sometimes used for the castable mounting method due to
the absence of
external heat and pressure for mounting, however, the term cold can be a
misnomer for
mounting heat-sensitive materials in an acrylic resin, or in a fast-curing
epoxy resin, or in a
large-volume epoxy medium, or in an insulating mounting mold - all of which
can generate high
exotherms during resin polymerization.
Acrylic resins: (a) cure quickly, (b) have low cost, (c) are too viscous for
impregnation,
(d) can generate heat in excess of 100C by polymerization, (e) usually do
not bond to the
sample, (f) have classic problems with high shrinkage during cuing, which
creates shrinkage
gaps between the resin and sample, and (g) have poor edge retentions.
Epoxy resins, although more expensive than acrylics, are more commonly
used because:
(a) epoxy will physically adhere to the sample with good bond and eliminate
shrinkage gap, (b)
epoxy will not react with the sample and with other solvents, etchants,
chemicals, and oil
33
Encapsulation Procedure - For encapsulation, a small sample (with a small
paper of
sample identification) is placed in a 1 to 1.25-in. diameter plastic
(polyethylene, reusable PVC
pipe sections), flexible (silicon mold, or Buehlers reusable EPDM cup mold),
or metal (brass,
copper pipe sections) ring form, cup, or other (square or rectangular-shaped)
cold mounting
container coated with a thin film of mold release agent (such as petroleum
jelly, or Buehlers
release agent). The sample should be dry as moisture in the sample can
interfere with
polymerization of epoxy and affects adhesion. Freshly mixed, clear, or dyed
epoxy (at correct
resin-to-hardener ratio) is poured on and around the sample to immerse it
completely in the
epoxy, the epoxy is allowed to cure, and eventually the sample in hardened
epoxy is removed
from the mold, properly identified, and sectioned. For larger samples such as
a severely cracked
or fragmented concrete sample, it is wrapped in an aluminum foil to form a
bowl or placed in a
disposable plastic or aluminum bowl, oven-dried at ~ 30-40C to remove its
free moisture; then
encapsulated in epoxy. Sample should be re-identified immediately after
removing it from the
mounting mold.
Vacuum Impregnation - The lower the viscosity of the epoxy, the deeper its
depth of
penetration into the sample during impregnation, and the better its
mechanical bond to the
constituents.
For effective epoxy penetration, the following procedure is helpful. A thin
slice of
sample, approximately 5-10 mm thick, is first thoroughly dried either in an
oven at 30 to 40C
for 12-16 hours to a constant mass, or, by immersing it in alcohol for
removing free internal
moisture by the solvent replacement method, or, by rapid freeze-drying by
immersing the sample
34
removes air bubbles within the epoxy, which usually prevent good bonding.
In the absence of
such sealing with epoxy, pores and margins of cracks or air voids may be
enlarged during
sectioning, grinding, or polishing operations and may entrap various foreign
materials like
grinding and polishing abrasives, solvents and stain-producing etchants.
Impregnation with a
colored or fluorescent dye mixed low-viscosity epoxy can highlight pores,
voids, and cracks. The
effective epoxy-impregnation procedure depends on thorough pre-drying of
the sample to a
constant mass so that all free water in the pores, cracks, and voids are
removed to make room for
the epoxy. Drying should be restricted to a temperature of around 30-40C to
prevent excessive
shrinkage and cracking of the concrete or mortar by dehydration of cement
hydration products.
Sample is commonly dried overnight in an oven or on a slide warmer or hot
plate at 30-40C.
To check the tendency of paste to crack during drying, the oven-dried sample
could be compared
with the room-temperature-dried sample. High curing temperatures can
induce strain
birefringence in the epoxy. Drying a field concrete at > 60C can cause
dehydration of ettringite
and microcracking due to temperature gradients. For fragmented and
powdered samples like
mortar fragments, cement, aggregate, and ground clinker successive stages
of oven drying,
vacuum impregnation and encapsulation into blocks of epoxy resin and
hardening the resin under
heat (~50C) are not uncommon before sectioning, grinding, polishing, and
thin sectioning
operations.
Stutzman and Clifton [22] described a three-stage procedure for
impregnation of very low
viscosity epoxy in cement paste, mortar, and concrete without drying (to
avoid drying shrinkage
cracking), by solvent replacement, first by replacing the pore solution with
ethanol, and then by
replacing ethanol with a low-viscosity epoxy, which is then cured at room
temperature.
Removable Mounting Medium - If the bonding medium needs to be removed
after the
examinations, instead of epoxy, which permanently hardens in the sample,
other types of
temporary mounting media can be used. Roberts and Scali [23] suggested a
1:5 solution of
commercially available colorless nylon fingernail hardener in methanol,
which can be later
removed by soaking in an appropriate solvent. ASTM C 457 mentions use of
Carnauba wax that
must be used with safety precautions to prevent accidental explosion during
the heating over the
flash point to remove the excess wax. Alternately, some mounting epoxy can
be dissolved in
methylene chloride (carcinogenic), or softened by dipping it in boiling
glycerin for 1 to 2 hours
(Ahmed [6]).
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
35
(5) Sectioning
Purposes Sectioning helps to: (a) obtain a smaller, manageable sized
specimen from
the parent material, which helps to keep the rest of the sample for other
analysis; (b) expose the
internal surface of interest for grinding; and (c) reduce the thickness of the
sample to minimize
time for subsequent grinding as in thin sectioning. Concrete samples should
be sectioned at
longitudinal and transverse directions relative to their orientations in the field
(i.e., direction of
placement) to reveal the microstructural details in all orientations including
the most crucial
near-surface zone. Sectioning can be the most damage-producing step
(especially for a brittle or
poorly consolidated material) in the entire process of sample preparation.
Proper selections of
saw and blade are, therefore, crucial to minimize the surface damage. More
damage will
increase the grinding time, which, in turn, can increase the relief. Minimizing
surface damage
during sectioning is, therefore, beneficial for subsequent grinding.
Large Saws Various abrasive-wheel or diamond-bonded sectioning
machines
containing blades from 8-10 in. to 18-24 in. in diameter and using water or
oil as coolant are
used for sectioning large samples. Wet cutting produces a smooth, sectioned
surface and
prevents excessive surface damage from overheating. An oil-cooled saw
usually produces
less heat generates during sectioning and the sectioned surfaces have
minimal deformations.
Although cubic boron nitrade (CBN), aluminum oxide, and SiC are used for
abrasives in
precision blades for metallurgical applications, diamond blades are most
common for both
metallurgical and petrographic sample preparations. Selection of a thin,
proper diamond blade is
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
36
crucial to reduce the surface deformation. Various types of wafering blades
are: bonded blades
composed of inner metal core and an outer rim of metal or resin bonded
abrasive; plated blades
consisting of a solid metal core with diamonds nickel-coated to the rim; and
diamond segmented
rim or continuous rim blades. Table 5 lists various manufacturers of abrasive
cutters, precision
saws, and blades.
Coolant Water is the most common coolant, which should be mixed with a
corrosion
resistant chemical to prevent rusting of the blade. Water-sensitive materials
should be sectioned
with a cutting fluid, propylene glycol, isopropyl alcohol, or more economically
with a low
viscosity cutting oil, or a hydraulic food-line mineral oil (e.g., baby oil or Mobil
DTE FM 32,
Campbell [15]). Cutting fluids should not be flammable and should not
impose any health
hazards in the form of vapor or aerosol, in which case proper safety
precautions and ventilations
should be taken in handling and disposing the fluid. Use of gloves is
recommended.
The sectioned sample should be thoroughly cleaned with water, acetone, or
isopropyl
alcohol to remove the debris formed by sectioning, and any cutting fluid, and
then air- or ovendried
prior to subsequent grinding and other preparation steps. Small samples
should be cleaned
in a sonic cleaner with the appropriate cleaning solution.
(6) Lapping and Grinding
Purpose - Grinding1 and lapping remove deformations, surface irregularities,
and saw
marks induced during sectioning and provide a smooth, perfectly flat, and
matt-finished surface.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
37
(b) A single or dual-deck bench top or stand alone grinding/polishing unit
housing horizontal
rotary wheel(s) (usually 8 to 12 in. diameter) to accept clean, or PSA-backed
grinding papers,
or magnetic discs with or without single/multiple sample holding fixtures
(head); a wide
remove the sectioning damage, produces less damage from grinding than a
coarser abrasive.
Diamond discs have a long service life but can be far more aggressive for
grinding soft and
sensitive materials than the SiC abrasive papers, which have relatively short
service life but are
better for grinding soft materials.
Common abrasive grains are: (a) silicon carbide (SiC) or aluminum oxide
(Al2O3) with
the following various ANSI/CAMI (USA) grit numbers (the corresponding
median micron size
of the particle size distribution is in parenthesis, Buehler [17]): 60 (268-m),
80 (188-m), 100
(148-m), 120 (116-m), 180 (78-m), 220 (66-m), 240 (51.8-m), 280
(42.3-m), 320 (34.3m), 360 (27.3-m), 400 (22.1-m), 500 (18.2-m), 600 (14.5-m), 800
(12.2-m), 1000 (9.2m), 1200 (6.5-m), and 3000 (3.5-m); and (b) diamond paste or
suspension applied on a
grinding paper, disc, or cloth attached to a horizontal rotary wheel (10 to15m size diamond
paste and 9.5-m alumina powder slurry are commonly used for the
intermediate to final fine
grinding operations). The Mohs hardness of alumina and SiC are 9, and
diamond is 10
(corresponding Knoop hardnesses are 2100, 2300, and 8000, respectively).
Due to its high
hardness, diamond is the abrasive of choice for grinding hard materials such
as rocks, concrete,
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
38
ceramics, and glass. Diamond abrades faster, removes more material per
unit time, and produces
a more consistent surface finish (usually with less relief) than alumina or SiC.
SiC and alumina
both occur either as loose powders or as fixed abrasive paper. Aluminum
oxide crystals are
more blocky than SiC crystals - the former breaks down into uniformly
shaped particles.
Alumina is a better choice for a scratch-free surface and for grinding a soft
material than SiC.
Alumina is available in hexagonal and cubic crystal forms and produced by
calcination (tends to
have agglomerated forms) or by sol-gel process (agglomerate-free).
Deagglomerated alumina
produces a better surface finish than agglomerated form of the same particle
size. Methods for
sizing the SiC/Al2O3 abrasives in the abrasive papers are by sieving for the
coarsest grits,
sedimentation grading for the intermediate grits (240-600), and electrical
resistance method for
the very fine grits. Hack-sawed, bandsawed, and other rough sections
produced on a rough or
thick diamond blade or abrasive cut-off wheel require coarse grinding to
remove surface
irregularities by using grit sizes of 60 to 100; whereas samples sectioned by
using a thin,
precision blade (which produces minimum surface deformation) should start
grinding with grit
sizes of 320 or 400.
A grinding disc of fine stainless steel mesh attached to a substrate (e.g.,
Buehlers UltraPlan disc charged with diamond slurries or sprays) is promising to produce a
surface finish
between grinding and coarse polishing, for rapid sample removal without
producing large
amounts of deformation in the sample, and to minimize surface relief,
especially during the final
thinning of a thin section on a glass slide from 30 to 40-m down to 15 to 20m (Campbell
[personal communication]).
Clinker, Cement, and Concrete Grinding Sectioned whole or crushed clinker
samples
and encapsulated cement samples are commonly ground on a horizontal
rotary wheel with
successively finer sized fixed abrasive papers charged with SiC, Al2O3, or
diamond and
lubricated with a solvent (propylene glycol), or oil. Concrete samples are
lapped on a larger
diameter (18 to 24-in.) horizontal rotary cast iron lapping wheel charged with
SiC or Al2O3
powder abrasives, or, more efficiently, with a series of diamond magnetic
discs. Samples are
either lapped by holding in hand (for larger samples) or placed inside a
lapping ring on the
lapping plate with weights on the samples (for samples up to 4 6-in.
dimension). Single or
dual-wheeled 8 to10-in. diameter horizontal rotary grinding/polishing
machines are also used for
grinding concrete samples prior to thin sectioning, and for polishing.
39
Lapping Although in many literatures the term lapping is used
synonymously with
grinding, lapping is the type of grinding where the abrasive particles are
applied as loose grains
and roll freely on the surface of a cast iron or plastic lapping wheel or disc.
The wheel is usually
charged with slurries of small amounts of SiC, alumina, or diamond.
(7) Polishing
Purpose - Polishing produces a smooth, flat, deformation-free, and scratchfree surface,
which is bright, shiny, and mirror-like in appearance with sharp edges and
good differentiation
between the constituents. Polishing minimizes all fine surface irregularities
left over during the
grinding operation. A polished surface is essential for observations of stained
and etched
surfaces in a high-power reflected-light (metallurgical) microscope and for
detailed
microstructural evaluations including secondary and backscatter electron
imaging and x-ray
microanalysis in a scanning electron microscope. Polishing operations should
not introduce
extraneous structures such as damage on the surface, pitting, scratches,
dragging out of
inclusions, comet tailing, staining, or relief. Grain mounts, small finely ground
sections of
concrete, mortar, and other building materials, and uncovered thin sections
of materials can be
polished by using various polishing abrasives and lubricants on polishing
cloths attached to a
horizontal rotary wheel. Prolonged polishing can introduce relief or height
difference due to
differential rates of abrasion of soft and hard components.
Polishing Abrasives Unlike grinding abrasives, the smallest of which are
around 5-m
in size, polishing abrasives are usually from 5-m to submicron in size.
Traditional polishing
abrasives are: (a) diamond paste or suspension in distilled water, oil, or in an
appropriate carrier,
(b) deagglomerated aluminum oxide in powder form or in suspension in
distilled water, or in an
organic solvent (ethylene glycol, alcohol, kerosene, glycerol), or in polishing
oil, and (c)
amorphous silicon dioxide in colloidal suspension. Water-based carrier is
avoided in polishing
water-sensitive materials. Cerium oxide, chromium oxide, magnesium oxide,
or iron oxide are
sometimes used for polishing specific materials (e.g., glass). Diamond pastes
or suspensions
containing either virgin natural diamond, or, synthetic monocrystalline, or
more effective
polycrystalline forms of diamonds are excellent polishing abrasives and have
been used for
metallurgical polishing since the late 1920s (Buehler [17]). Aqueous fine
alumina powders and
slurries, such as Buehlers MicroPolish deagglomerated alumina powders and
suspensions of
alpha alumina (0.3-m size) and gamma alumina (0.05-m size) slurries (or
suspensions) are
good for final polishing (either in sequence or singularly) with medium nap
polishing cloths. As
mentioned in grinding, deagglomerated alumina produced by the sol-gel
process produces a
better surface polish than fine alumina abrasives of the same size produced
by the traditional
calcination process (which always includes some agglomeration). Colloidal
amorphous silica
suspension is common in metallurgical applications and produces a good
surface polish in
40
hardness/softness and low, medium, or high nap (fiber) depending on the
polishing abrasive
used, and (e) be clean of any processing chemicals (such as dye), which may
react with the
sample. Many cloths of different fabrics, weaves, or naps are available.
Napless or low nap
cloths are good for coarse polishing with diamond abrasives. Napless, low,
medium, and
occasionally high nap cloths are good for final polishing. A hard polishing
cloth that does not
have a nap is good for minimizing surface relief. A soft cloth that has a nap
controls
scratching and produces a better quality surface finish. Usually, successively
finer sized
diamond or alumina abrasives on moderately hard to hard napless or lownap polishing cloths
(e.g., Buehlers TexMet) are used for coarse to fine polishing, and softer,
submicron-sized
deagglomerated alumina or colloidal silica abrasives on a soft, napped cloth
(e.g., Buehlers
MicroCloth) is used for the final polishing.
Polishing Methods - Coarse polishing involves the use of successively finer
(from 6 or 5m to 1-m) diamond or alumina abrasives charged onto napless or low-nap
polishing cloths.
Intermediate and fine polishing involve the use of successively finer submicron-sized (0.3-m
and 0.05-m) deagglomerated alumina or diamond abrasives on napless or
low nap to medium
nap polishing cloths. Mechanical polishing indicates procedures involving the
use of polishing
abrasives on cloths; the cloths may be attached to a rotating wheel or a
vibratory polisher bowl;
and then dried. Thorough cleaning of the surface after grinding and polishing
are important to
remove the abrasive residues and their interference during x-ray
microanalysis in SEM. Rapid
drying of the ground/polished surface can be done by applying a stream of
forced warm air or
compressed air to the surface.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
41
Table 2 provides various grinding and polishing methods. Table 5 provides a
list of
various manufacturers of polishing abrasives, cloths, and equipments.
(8) Etching and Staining
Etching Etching a polished section of a clinker, cement, slag, or concrete
with a
chemical reagent (etchant) highlights various components (e.g., individual
clinker phases,
residual clinker particles in concrete, slag, etc.) by selective absorption of the
etchant with
removal of surface layers of the components of interest in solution. The
etched surface is
observed in a high-power reflected-light (metallurgical) microscope. Etching
of carbonate
aggregates by dilute hydrochloric acid produces CO2-effervescence.
Limestone aggregates
show higher effervescence than dolomitic aggregates. Etching can be
performed on a smooth,
dry, highly polished section, which is free of any surface irregularities and
lubricants from the
previous grinding or polishing operations. Usually the polished surface is
immersed into a thin
layer of etchant in a shallow petri dish (or held above in case of diluted HF
acid vapor etchant;
HF acid is placed in a platinum crucible and the inverted polished surface is
held above it) and is
then washed with alcohol to stop the reaction and quickly dried in an air
current. Nital, HF
vapor, potassium hydroxide in alcohol, and salicylic acid in alcohol are the
most common
etchants used in clinker microscopy (see Campbell [15]). Borax and sodium
hydroxide solutions
are the etchants for examinations of high alumina cement. Table 3 provides
twenty different
staining and etching procedures for examination of polished sections of
clinker, cement, raw
feeds, slag, concrete, and aggregates (see Campbell [15], St. John et al. [2],
Walker [14], and
Hutchinson [1] for comprehensive reviews).
Crack Identification Various authors suggested a dye impregnation method
for
highlighting cracks in concrete by solvent replacement procedure, which
involves immersing a
wet, cleaned, finely ground, and polished section of concrete (polished with
6-m diamond
paste) in a red or fluorescent dye-mixed alcoholic solution, followed by
careful re-polishing in
water with 1 to 3-m diamond to remove any excess dye from the surface
(Hornain et al. [24];
Gran [25). Dye-impregnated micro and macro cracks are easily highlighted in
reflected-light
examination. A fluorescent dye mixed alcohol treated ground or polished
surface can highlight
many fine cracks when examined in ultraviolet light. Dye-mixed epoxy
impregnated thin
sections are also excellent for highlighting cracks (described later).
Staining Selective staining of finely ground, polished or thin sections of
clinker,
cement, or concrete with a chemical reagent highlights various components
with a reaction
product remaining on the surface which is either colored or can develop
characteristic colors by
further treatment. Tables 3 and 4 describe various staining techniques for
identification of
different phases in clinker, cement, aggregate, and concrete. Hutchinson [1]
and Campbell [15]
described various staining techniques applied on uncovered or polished thin
sections to highlight
various silicates (feldspar, quartz, mica) and carbonates (calcite versus
dolomite) in rocks,
aggregates, and raw feeds.
(9) Thin Sectioning (Including Fluorescent Thin Section Preparation)
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
42
Thin sectioning indicates reducing a sample thickness down to approximately
20-m
(0.020 mm), through which light can transmit. Thin sectioning is an
important step in sample
preparation, which provides the detailed anatomy of a materials
microstructure, and a wealth of
information about the overall texture, condition, mineralogy, composition,
and the depth of
43
down to a small slice, slightly smaller than the glass slide of the final thinsection and around 510 mm in thickness. Trimming is usually done in a wet tile saw or in a
precision saw having a
thin diamond-bonded blade, which produces a very smooth cut with
minimum surface
deformation. For water-sensitive materials, a cutting fluid or oil is used. For
soft and brittle
materials, a second epoxy impregnation is sometimes required after
trimming of the epoxyimpregnated
sample if the trimmed surface (which will be the final thin-section) does not
achieve
the desired hardness and integrity by vacuum impregnation.
(c) Fine Grinding Fine grinding of the saw-cut surface of trimmed sample is
necessary for
good bonding of that surface to the glass slide. Fine grinding at 320 or 600
grit abrasive paper is
necessary to remove the minimum surface irregularities created during
sectioning and to achieve
a perfectly smooth and flat surface that will bond intimately to the glass
slide. After grinding,
the surface should be thoroughly cleaned, freed of oil, dirt, grease or
lubricant from previous
actions, and oven-dried to a constant mass at 30-40C.
(d) Bonding the Ground Sample to a Glass Slide The oven-dried, smooth,
flat, clean,
ground surface of the sample is glued with an adhesive to a clean, dry, and
ground (frosted) glass
slide of known thickness. A low-viscosity, fast-setting liquid adhesive is used
for bonding (e.g.,
see Table 1, Canada balsam resin, having a refractive index of 1.54, is
commonly used, other
choices are Buehlers Epothin, Logitechs Epoxy Pack 301, or Loctite
manufactured by Loctite
Corporation, which cures in 15 minutes in a 385nm UV light having an
intensity of 300
microwatt at 6 in.). Various spring-loaded thin-section bonding fixtures (e.g.,
Buehlers
PetroBond) are helpful for applying uniform pressures over the slide during
the hardening of the
thin film of epoxy at the sample-slide interface. Glass slides up to 50 75
mm in size are
usually 1-1.5 mm in thickness; larger slides up to 100 150 mm should be 3
to 4 mm thick and
all slides should be frosted or ground in one side for uniform thickness of the
slide, better
adhesion, and flat, continuous contact of the ground sample to the slide.
Usually, a few drops or
a thin film of epoxy is spread on the ground surface and the frosted side of
the glass slide is
placed onto the surface from a 45 angle. Pressing and rubbing the back of
the slide against the
sample surface remove all trapped air bubbles.
(e) First-stage Thinning by Precision Sectioning The excess portion of the
glass-mounted
sample block is removed by using a micrometer-controlled diamond wafering
blade in a
precision saw, leaving a thickness of about 0.5 mm attached to the glass
slide (or about 1 mm
thick slice if done by hand on a regular tile saw with a thin diamond blade).
Table 2 lists various
precision sectioning machines that can be used for this purpose.
(f) Second-stage Thinning by Precision Grinding After the first sectioning,
the sample is
44
first order gray interference color of quartz indicates 25 to 30-m thickness
of the sample (in
thicker samples, quartz grains are usually yellow or purple). In the absence
of a thin-sectioning
equipment, precision grinding can be done by holding the glass slide with a
suitable sample
holder (with the sample side down) on a horizontal rotary grinding wheel
covered with a fine
steel mesh or a metal- or resin-bonded diamond disc or Buehlers Ultra-Pad
and charged with
fine (5 to 15-m) diamond or alumina abrasive slurries.
(g) Final Thinning by Hand Grinding - Some authors (Ahmed [5], Campbell
[15]) and thin
sectioning equipment manufacturers (Buehler, Logitech) suggest thinning of
the sample down to
40 to 50-m by using the precision sectioning/grinding machine and then
final thinning down to
20-m by careful hand grinding of the sample on a glass plate charged with
5 to 10-m sized
alumina or SiC abrasive slurry in water, light oil, or glycol, or, more
efficiently, on a fine woven
steel-mesh pad (e.g., Buehlers UltraPlan) charged with 15 to 25-m size
diamond suspension or
paste. Thinning of the paste of portland cement concrete (relative to much
harder aggregates) can
be accomplished with the Buehlers Ultra-Pad on a rotary wheel with a slurry
of silicon carbide
much dye in the epoxy, or too thick section will increase the total amount of
fluorescence (show
brighter image) and gives an apparent water-cement ratio, which is higher
than the actual value.
If the epoxy appears too pale or too yellow in large voids this would indicate
a wrong dosage of
fluorescent dye during the preparation of epoxy. Usually, the amount of dye
to add is 1 percent
by mass of the epoxy resin. Inhomogeneity in color distribution may indicate
insufficient mixing
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
45
of dye in epoxy. The thickness of thin-section should provide first order gray
interference color
of quartz (i.e., 20-m or 0.02-mm thick). The thin section should be located
in the fully epoxyimpregnated
part of the sample. Due to the very small depth of impregnation of epoxy
into
concrete, thin section should be prepared from the top impregnated surface
with as little grinding
after impregnation as possible. Depending on the water-cement ratio (i.e.,
density or porosity) of
a concrete and the viscosity of epoxy, this depth of epoxy penetration can
vary from as little as
0.05 mm to 1.5 mm. Insufficient impregnation is indeed a common problem,
therefore, check
the small voids in thin-section in plane-polarized light to make sure that they
are completely
filled with the fluorescent or colored epoxy. Also, since the intensity of
fluorescent dye
decreases with time and exposure to light, new standards should be
prepared relatively often and
fluorescent thin-section should be kept in dark cupboard. The intensity of
light source in the
microscope should also be constant. Areas of carbonated or leached paste
should be avoided as
these processes change the porosity of paste and hence the degree of
fluorescence. Avoid the
areas of the paste that are too close to a large void or crack or at the edges
of thin-section because
the bright light flares from the epoxies may increase the brightness of the
paste and, hence, the
apparent water-cement ratio. Depending on the inhomogeneities of the
paste, approximately 10
to 30 randomly selected areas in each thin-section are selected for ratio
determination (avoiding
46
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
47
weight is placed on the slide and the epoxy is allowed to harden. After
hardening, the
encapsulation easily separates from the non-stick paper, the excess epoxy is
trimmed from the
edges of the slide with a single-edge razor blade, and the sample is ready for
coarse and fine
polishing with diamond pastes or slurries on Buehler's TexMet or equivalent
cloth. The particles
can be seen at the base of the epoxy.
Grain mounts normally require no lapping with silicon-carbide papers. No. 2
rubber
stopper, or a cabinet door "bumper" is affixed with Super-Glue to the back of
the microscope
slide, facilitating holding the slide to the horizontal polishing wheel.
The first polishing step is primarily for thinning the grain mount until broad
cross
sections of individual particles can be seen under the microscope. The entire
preparation of the
specimen surface can be done on a horizontal polisher-grinder. In the final
stages of polishing,
seeing the particles with the naked eye is normally difficult if the particles
are, say, cement-grain
size. Therefore frequent checking with the microscope is necessary until the
desired thickness
(usually 20 to 40 microns) and degree of polish is attained. The stopper is
removed with a singleedged
razor blade after final polishing or etching. If no transmitted-light
observations are
planned for the section, then a ceramic tile and Super-Glue can be used
instead of a glass
microscope slide and epoxy. The method normally requires roughly 15 to 30
minutes, depending
on temperature and embedding liquid characteristics. Gridded microscope
slides are helpful for
returning to a particular grain.
(12) Thin-Sections for Aggregate Petrography (ASTM C 295)
For aggregate petrography (ASTM C 295), the author uses several 50 75
mm thinsections
for preparation of coarse and fine aggregates. Following careful washing,
oven drying,
and sieve analysis of the aggregates, a representative size fraction retained
in each sieve is
collected by coning and quartering. At least 150 particles are examined in
each sieve. For the
size fractions coarser than 3/8 in., the author uses one or multiple 50 70
mm-thin sections, or a
large-area (up to 100 150 mm. size) thin section per size fraction to
include adequate number
of grains. For sizes finer than 3/8 in., one frosted, 50 75 mm glass slide is
first covered at four
sides and partitioned inside into multiple compartments by gluing several
small glass or plastic
partitions on the glass slide with a rapid setting commercial resin (e.g.,
superglue). Alternately, a
plastic, compartmented, disposable sample mold with 4 to 6 compartments
placed on a silicone
grease-coated glass plate (or glued to a frosted glass slide by superglue) can
also be used (e.g.,
plastic fluorescent-light diffuser panels with multiple square chambers
described for preparation
of clinker and raw feed thin sections by Campbell [15]). Each selected sieve
fraction is mixed
with enough epoxy to create a thick paste-like consistency and poured into
each labeled
compartment on the glass slide and then vacuum impregnated. For fine
aggregate, one 50 70
mm glass slide can hold up to 5 or 6 different sieve sizes with more than
enough grains to
examine. A few minutes in a vacuum chamber removes most air bubbles.
The epoxyencapsulated
grains are cured either in air, or in an oven, or on a hot plate at 40-50C. The
hardened sample is then thin-sectioned according to the steps described in
thin sectioning. The
hardened sample is first sectioned down to 300 to 500-m in a precision saw
and then reduced to
the final thickness by precision grinding. The frosted glass slide on which the
epoxy-mixed
grains were poured can be used to make the final thin-section. The method is
similar to grain
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
48
thin section preparation, which is also recommended by ASTM C 295 for
examining particles
finer than No. 50 (300-m) sieve.
(13) Phenolphthalein and Rainbow Indicators for Determining the
Depth of Carbonation
The above-two solutions are used for determining the depth of carbonation in
a portland
cement concrete. A fresh fracture surface or a fresh saw-cut section of a
concrete is treated with
a 1 percent phenolphthalein alcoholic solution - the non-carbonated concrete
turns to pink color
due to its inherent high alkalinity (pH > 9) whereas the carbonated portion
does not change to
pink due to a drop in alkalinity by carbonation (pH < 9). Carbonation of paste
along a crack can
be distinctly observed by application of phenolphthalein. Upward migration
of soluble alkalis
through a concrete slab by moisture and accumulation of those ions near the
carbonated surface
can give a false pink coloration, which should be corrected for the true
depth of carbonation
(usually by further examinations of the true depth of carbonation in a thinsection). Another less
common method is the similar treatment of a fresh fracture surface with a
solution called
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
49
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
50
Though not common, dye-mixed epoxy impregnated large-area (50 75
mm) thin
sections prepared from the top, middle, and bottom portions of a concrete
core, or, an ultra-large
100 150 mm thin section prepared from a 4-in. (100 mm) diameter
concrete core can be used
to study air voids in a stereomicroscope or petrographic microscope
equipped with an automated
air void analyzer (Buckingham and Spaw [36]). An area of at least 12 in.2 (77
cm2) is needed for
image, one method suggests treatment of a finely ground, clean, and oven
dried concrete section
to black ink (by slightly wetting a surface of a stamp pad with black ink and
gently pressing that
surface against the ground surface without filling the voids with ink),
followed by oven drying
the ink and filling all the voids with white zinc oxide paste (smeared over the
warm, dry, black
ink-treated surface). The surface is then cooled and re-dried to harden the
paste, carefully
scrapped with a plastic scraper or putty knife to remove the excess paste,
and slightly re-ground
to highlight the white paste-filled air voids and pore spaces against the black
background
(Ahmed [4]). Void spaces within the aggregate particles should be manually
darkened with a
black marker pen to reduce errors in air void calculations.
Another method suggests vacuum impregnating the sample with a lowviscosity epoxy,
which is thoroughly mixed with a white titanium dioxide pigment (where the
voids will be filled
and thus highlighted by the white epoxy), treating the epoxy impregnated,
lapped and oven dried
clean surface with black ink, drying the ink in an oven, followed by slightly
re-grinding the
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
51
surface just to remove the ink stain from the white epoxy filled voids so that
the white voids can
stand out against the black background (Ahmed [3]).
Several other authors have proposed determination of air void parameters by
semiautomated
image analysis techniques where similar white filling materials were used to
highlight
the air voids against the dark background of surrounding matrix in the finely
ground or polished
section and to enhance their contrasts in the image (Chatterji and
Gudmundsson [32]; Cahill et
al. [33]; Roberts and Scali [23]; Peterson et al. [34]; Laurencot et al. [35],
Buckingham and Spaw
[36], Pade et al. [37], and Zhang et al. [38]).
Any surface defects resulting from sample preparation (e.g., grain plucking)
may increase
the void content in an automated image analysis procedure. Coalescence
and clustering of
52
very fine grain size of many cement clinkers and portland cement hydration
products in a
concrete (finer than 25-m), ultra-thin sections are necessary. They are
usually prepared by a
vibratory polisher (e.g., Buehlers Vibromet, Ahmed [3, 5, 6], Ray [40]) which
slowly and very
gently polishes a conventionally prepared thin section to carefully grind it
down to the desired
thickness and provide microstructural details by removing the grain stacking.
The vibratory
polisher uses a polishing cloth attached to a polishing bowl and receives a
micron to submicron
size abrasive. Generally, a steel mesh cloth (e.g., Buehlers Ultra-Plan)
charged with 5 to 6-m
diamond slurry is used for first stage ultra-thinning down to 12 to15-m and
then a hard, napless
cloth (TexMet pad) charged with 1-m diamond slurry, or a soft napped cloth
(MicroCloth)
charged with submicron sized alumina is used for final delicate thinning
down to 6 to 10-m
(Ahmed [5, 6]). Due to the very slow sample removal, the entire process can
take 12 to16 hours
depending on the sample hardness.
The second type, i.e., ultra thinning a slice of concrete down to less than 0.1m, is in fact
a very delicate procedure, which is needed for observation in a transmission
electron microscope.
This is done first by mechanical abrasion and then by careful slicing,
polishing, and finally
bombarding the doubly polished disc of sample with argon ion or atom beam
until perforation.
Differential rates of thinning by different constituents, and heat and radiation
damage during
53
containing a single-crystal quartz glass plate, or by using a thin-film sample
holder. Other
methods for analyzing fine samples are smearing the fine mineral powder on
a normal
petrographic slide and slurry it with acetone (can led to preferred orientation
of platy minerals),
or, sprinkling powder onto a tacky adhesive coat on a glass slide (will provide
less preferred
orientation than the slurry with acetone). Hutchinson [1] described various
other preparation
techniques for clay minerals such as powder pressing, smearing clay paste
on a glass slide,
suction on ceramic tile, and centrifugation on ceramic tile.
Various selective extraction techniques of portland cement and clinker1, such
as
potassium hydroxide/sugar extraction, salicylic acid/methanol extraction, and
nitric
acid/methanol extraction selectively dissolve the interstitial (aluminate,
ferrite) phases, calcium
silicate phases, and silicate/aluminate phases in the cement, respectively,
which, thereby, reduce
the peak interference problem, and highlight the selectively un-dissolved
phases in the
diffraction pattern. Cement and other moisture-sensitive materials should be
handled carefully
during the preparation steps, and stored in a vacuum desiccator to eliminate
hydration.
(20) Sample preparation for environmental and cryo-SEM and other
new x-ray
microscopical techniques
Cryo-SEM and environmental SEM (ESEM) offer examination of early
hydration of
cement and associated microstructural development without any possible
alteration induced by
drying of sample in a conventional SEM. In cryo-SEM, sample is freeze rapidly
in liquid
nitrogen at 195C to stop any ongoing hydration (e.g., of freshly mixed
cement paste) where the
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
54
preparations (e.g., ease of sectioning and grinding, depth of epoxy
penetration, etc.) can provide
clues about the nature of the sample or even the cause of deterioration.
Table 6 provides various
common sample preparation steps for clinker, cement, aggregate, concrete,
mortar, and plaster
materials. The basic methods of preparation remain the same with some
necessary and minor
surfaces, ground surfaces, thin sections, and polished surfaces are the
common modes of
observations of concrete and masonry in optical microscopes. Powder
mounts on a conductive
carbon tape, carbon or gold coated fresh fracture surfaces, polished sections,
and polished thin
sections are the common modes of examinations in scanning electron
microscopy. A pulverized
sample is used for x-ray diffraction and chemical analysis.
There are some specific claims of minimum sample preparation and
examination of as
received, fresh fractured, or saw-cut (unlapped, carbon-coated) section for
concrete materials
characterization and failure investigation in SEM (Marusin [43, 44]). Minimum
sample
preparation may be preferable at some specific cases, such as examination
of water-soluble salts,
efflorescence deposits, or specific areas of interest in a sample, which could
be lost by
subsequent sample preparation. Despite such specific cases, careful and
appropriate sample
preparation, often adequate and satisfactory enough to show the necessary
microstructural details
are very crucial for detailed examination and correct interpretation of
materials and
microstructures.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
55
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author acknowledges help from Prof. David Walker of Columbia
University, George
Vander Voort and late Wase U. Ahmed of Buehler Ltd., and Dr. Donald H.
Campbell of
Campbell Petrographic Services on various issues of sample preparation. A
thorough review of
the manuscript by Dr. Campbell is highly appreciated. Dr. Campbell has
contributed the section
on polished grain mounts. This article is dedicated to late Wase U. Ahmed for
his significant
contributions in sample preparation techniques for more than three decades.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
56
REFERENCES
[1] Hutchinson, C. S., Laboratory Handbook of Petrographic Techniques, John
Wiley and
Sons, New York, 1974, pp. 527.
[2] St. John, D.A., Poole, A. W., and Sims, I., Concrete Petrography: A
Handbook of
Investigative Techniques, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998, 474 pp..
[3] Ahmed, W.U., "Petrographic Methods for Analysis of Cement Clinker and
Concrete
Microstructure", Petrography of cementitious materials, S. DeHays, and D.
Stark eds,
ASTM STP 1215, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA,
1994, pp.
1-12.
[4] Ahmed, W.U., Advances in sample preparation for clinker and concrete
microscopy,
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Cement Microscopy,
1991, pp.1729.
[5] Ahmed, W.U., New equipment & methods for preparing concrete &
concrete making
materials for petrographic examination, Proceedings of the 19th
International
Conference on Cement Microscopy, 1997, pp. 130-139.
[6] Ahmed, W.U., Petrographic Examination Methods, Buehler, Ltd. TechNotes, Vol. 3,
Issue 5, 2000.
[7] ASTM C 295 (1998): Standard Guide for Petrographic Examination of
Aggregates for
Concrete, In: ASTM Vol. 4.02 (Concrete and Aggregates), Philadelphia, USA,
American
Society for Testing and Materials.
[8] ASTM C 457 (1998): Standard Test Method for Microscopical
Determination of
Parameters of the Air-Void System in Hardened Concrete, In: ASTM Vol. 4.02
(Concrete
and Aggregates), Philadelphia, USA, American Society for Testing and
Materials.
[9] ASTM C 856 (2004): Standard Practice for Petrographic Examination of
Hardened
Concrete, In: ASTM Vol. 4.02 (Concrete and Aggregates), Philadelphia, USA,
American
Society for Testing and Materials.
[10] ASTM C 1324 (2004): Standard Test Method for Examination and
Analysis of Hardened
Masonry Mortar, In: ASTM Internationals Masonry Standards for the Building
Industry,
Fifth Edition, Philadelphia, USA, American Society for Testing and Materials.
[11] French, W.J., Concrete Petrography: A Review, Quarterly Journal of
Engineering
57
[18] US Department of the Interior Concrete Manual, Water Resources
Technical Publication,
8th Ed., Revised, Denver, US Department of the Interior, 1981.
[19] ACI 201.1R-92, Guide for Making a Condition Survey of Concrete in
Service, American
Concrete Institute, 2004.
[20] ASTM C 823 (2000): Standard Practice for Examination and Sampling of
Hardened
Concrete in Constructions In: ASTM Vol. 4.02 (Concrete and Aggregates),
Philadelphia,
USA, American Society for Testing and Materials.
[21] Diamond, S. Cement Paste Microstructure, Proceedings of 8th
International
Conference on Chemistry of Cement, 1986.
[22] Stutzman, P.E. and Clifton J.R. Sample preparation for scanning electron
microscopy,
Proceedings of 21st ICMA Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, 1999.
[23] Roberts, L. R., and Scali, M. J., Factors affecting image analysis for
measurements of air
58
[34] Peterson, K. W., Swartz, R. A., Sutter, L. L., Van Dam, T. J., Air void
analysis of
hardened concrete with a flatbed scanner, Proceedings of the 24th
International conference
on cement microscopy, San Diego, California, 2002, pp. 304-316.
[35] Laurencot, J. L., Pleau, R., and Pigeon, M., The microscopical
determination of air voids
characteristics in hardened concrete: Development of an automatic system
using image
analysis techniques applied to micro-computers, Proceedings of 14th
International
Conference on Cement Microscopy, 1992.
[36] Buckingham and Spaw, Direct measure of spacing factor in air
entrained concrete,
Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Cement Microscopy, 1988,
pp. 82-92.
[37] Pade, C., Jakobsen, U. H., Elsen, J. A new automatic analysis system for
analyzing the air
void system in hardened concrete, Proceedings of the 24th International
Conference on
Cement Microscopy, San Diego, California, 2002, pp. 204-213.
[38] Zhang, Z., Ansari, F., and Vitillo, N., Automated determination of
entrained air-void
parameters in hardened concrete, ACI Materials Journal, V 102, No. 1,
January-February,
2005.
[39] Goldstein, J. I., Newbury, D. E., Echlin, P., Joy, D. C., Roming, A. D.,
Lyman, C. E., Fiori,
C., and Lifshin, E., Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis A
Text for
Biologists, Materials Scientists, and Geologists, 2nd Edition, Plenum Press,
1992, pp. 819.
[40] Ray, James A., Preparation of concrete samples for petrographic
studies, Proceedings
of 6th International Cement Microscopy Association, 1984, pp. 294-308.
59
Table 1: List of various encapsulating and impregnating castable resins and dyes 1
Epoxy and
Acrylic
Resins
Reference, Manufacturer Resin-to-hardener
mix ratio
Peak
temperature
(C)
Curing time
at room
temperature
Comments
Epoxide resin
and hardener
Buehler Ltd. 5:1, by weight 29 6-8 hours Medium viscosity; best
for encapsulation,
refractive index is 1.565.
EpoKwick Buehler Ltd. 5:1, by weight 85 90 minutes Fast cure, some
shrinkage, high heat,
transparent
EpoThin Buehler Ltd. 5:1.95, by weight 27 9 hours Low viscosity (250 cps at
60C in a oven
and so does
the sample
Shell Chemical Co. Suitable amount of epoxy
is mixed with 10-15 ml
of curing agent
60 Overnight Recommended method
for impregnating highly
friable or porous rocks
(Hutchinson 1974).
Refractive index of Epon
epoxy is 1.59.
EpoFix resin
and hardener
Struers Inc. 810 Sharon
Drive, Westlake, OH,
44145,
800-321-5834 (Tel)
9:1, by weight (8:1, by
volume)
43 8 hours Low viscosity resin good
for impregnation,
refractive index 1.57
Epo-Tek 301 Epoxy Technology, Inc.,
14 Fortune Drive,
Billerica, MA 01821, 978667-3805 (Tel)
4:1, by weight - - Low viscosity resin,
refractive index 1.56.
Permanent
mounting
media
Various petrographic
supply houses
Canada Balsam Resin or
Lakeside 70 synthetic
resin
- - Refractive indices 1.537
for Canada Balsam and
1.54 for Lakeside 70 used
for attaching sample to
glass slide
Meltmount for
grain mounts
Cargille Laboratories, Inc.
Cedar Grove, NJ 07009,
- - - Refractive indices 1.539
to 1.704 for grain mounts
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
60
973-239-6633 (Tel)
Quickmount Fulton Metallurgical
Products Corp., PO Box
118A, Saxonburg Blvd.,
Saxonburg, PA 16056,
724-265-1575 (Tel)
2 parts powder to 1 part
liquid, by volume
- - Used for grain mount and
encapsulation, a medium
viscosity resin
LR White Ernest F. Fullam, Inc.
900 Alabny Shaker Road,
Latham, NY 12110,
518-785-5533 (Tel)
Premixed resin - - Low viscosity good for
encapsulation and
especially impregnation
Loctite 363 Henkel Loctite Corp.
Rocky Hill, CT 06067
- - - 365 nm wavelength UVlight
cure rapid setting
glue for bonding samples
to frosted glass slide for
thin sectioning
Epoxy EPON
Resin 815C,
HELOXY
Modifier 61,
and
EPI-CURE
Curing Agent
3223 (DETA)
Miller-Stephenson
Chemical Company, Inc.,
George Washington
Highway, Danbury, CT
06810,
203-743-4447 (Tel)
E. V. Roberts,
8500 Steller Drive,
Culver City, CA 90232,
800-374-3872 (Tel);
70% epoxy+25%Heloxy
modifier+15% Curing
agent by weight
- 6-8 hours Low viscosity epoxy
good for impregnation
Epoxy Resin
GCR 324
mixed with
EPI-CURE
3234 (TETA)
Gulf Coast S & S, 6322 E.
Hwy 332, P. O. Box. E,
Freeport, TX, 77541, 408233-7277; EPI-CURE
3234 is from MillerStephenson
12 mL Epi-Cure in 100
61
diamond, deagglomerated
alumina, or colloidal
silica abrasive
Distilled water
for alumina
abrasive, water or
propylene or
ethylene glycol
for diamond
abrasive
Diamond paste or suspension
and alumina or colloidal silica
suspension on a hard, napless
or low-nap polishing cloth
(e.g., Buehlers TexMet).
For polishing a thin section or a
small piece of sample for SEM or
metallurgical microscope study; to
produce a low relief surface.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
62
Intermediate Polishing
Sub-micron sized
diamond, 0.3-m
deagglomerated alumina,
or colloidal silica
abrasive
Distilled water
for alumina
abrasive, water or
propylene or
ethylene glycol
for diamond
abrasive
Diamond paste or suspension
and alumina or colloidal silica
suspension on a moderately
hard to hard, napless or lownap
polishing cloth (e.g.,
Buehlers TexMet).
For polishing a thin section or a
small piece of sample for SEM or
metallurgical microscope study; to
produce a low relief surface.
Final Polishing
0.05-m deagglomerated
alumina powder or
colloidal silica
Water or
Propylene Glycol
or Ethylene
Glycol
Soft, napped polishing cloth
(e.g., Buehlers MicroCloth).
For fine polishing with a high
quality surface finish. MicroCloth
produces relief, which helps to
identify periclase in clinker,
cement, and concrete polished
sections.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
63
Bright white
Hydrofluoric acid (HF) vapor (kept at 20-22C) exposure for 5-10
sec.
Alite - Buff brown; Belite-Blue; C3A - Light gray; Ferrite-Bright
white; C2AS (melilite) in a high alumina cement is colored in HF
vapor
10% Isopropyl Alcohol (10mL isopropyl alcohol plus 90 mL water),
immersed for 30 sec.
Reacts strongly with alite and weakly with belite; C 3A shows a
weak reaction
Ammonium chloride (saturated, aqueous), 10 sec. Hexagonal section of alite perpendicular
to the three-fold axis
stains light yellow; prismatic section parallel to the c-axis turns
blue; zoned alite shows light-blue core and dark-blue rim
Ammonium chloride stain = 1g NH4Cl + 20 mL H2O + 20 mL ethyl
alcohol + 10 mL acetone + 150 mL isopropyl alcohol, 10-20 sec.
Alite turns brown, belite is unaffected. After 30-45 sec., Alite turns
yellow to yellowish green, belite to brown
Ammonium nitrate solution (1g NH4NO3 + 20 mL H2O + 20 mL
ethyl alcohol + 10 mL acetone + 150 mL isopropyl alcohol), 20-30
sec. etch.
Alite turns yellow-green; belite turns brown
Ammonium nitrate solution after the salicylic acid stain, 30 sec. Shows internal structure of
alite and belite.
Distilled water, 3-5 sec. Free lime (CaO) shows rapid etching from dark to iridescent green
and blue. C3A turns dark blue. Alite becomes brown, belite is
distinguished morphologically. Alkali sulfates are dark.
Water pH 6.8-7 on a saturated microlap cloth, 3 secs. Isopropyl
alcohol wash, warm air dry
MgO hard high physical relief, CaO turns dark to green/blue, C 3A
turns dark blue, C3S turns brown, C2S shows lamellar structure
10% MgSO4 solution, etch for 60 secs at 50C C2S in slag shows striation.
1% borax solution, etch for 30 sec., wash with alcohol C12A7 in high alumina cement turns
gray
Borax solution (1%, boiling) immersed for 10 sec. Etches blade-like pleochroite crystals in
high alumina cement
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
64
Table 4: Various staining techniques in concrete, aggregate, and clinker raw feeds
Specimen Method Observation Reference
Sulfates
Lapped, polished or
thin sections
Immerse in 2:1 mixture of BaCl2 : KMnO4
6% solution for 2 minutes, wash first with
water then with saturated oxalic acid.
Ettringite, gypsum,
anhydrite, plaster stain pink
to purple.
St. John et al. [2]
Feldspar, Quartz, and
Calcite for staining
raw feeds, aggregates,
and thin sections
aggregates
Prepare a methylene blue solution containing
4.5 grams of trihydrate methylene blue dye or
4.283 grams of dihydrate dye per liter of
distilled water; a uncovered grain thin section
Smectite particles turns
blue, muscovite, biotite and
other rock forming
minerals do not stain,
Higgs [46]
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
65
Hover [28]
Poole, McLachlan
and Ellis [29]
Guthrie and Carey
[30, 31]
Highlighting
microcracks
by fluorescent dye
mixed alcoholic
solution
Treatment of a ground section of moist
concrete with a fluorescent dye mixed
alcoholic solution followed by rinsing excess
solution, drying, and observation in a UV
light.
UV light at 240 nm
wavelength gives yellow
green fluorescence of
microcracks.
Gran [25], Mayfield
[47]
[Note: Consult the original reference before using a particular procedure for the first time]
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
66
67
above list of various equipments and consumables are for information purposes only. In
no case does this imply that these
products are the best, nor the only materials available. Manufacturers addresses and phone
numbers: (1) Buehler Ltd.; 41 Waukegan
Road, Lake Bluff, IL 60044; 847-295-6500; (2) Struers, Inc., 810 Sharon Drive, Westlake, OH
44145, 440-871-0071; (3) SBT - South
Bay Technology, Inc., 1120 Via Callejon, San Clemente, CA 92673, 800-SBT-2233; (4)
Microtec Engineering Laboratories, Inc., PO
Box. 636; Clifton, CO 81520; 970-434-8883; (5) Wards Natural Science Establishment, Inc.
PO Box 1712, Rochester, NY, 14603, 800962-2660; (6) Mobil Oil Corp. Products and Technology Dept., 3225 Gallows Rd., Fairfax,
Virginia, USA 22037, 703-849-3265; (7)
McCrone Associates and Companies, 850 Pasquinelli Drive, Westmont, IL 60559-5531 800622-8122; (8) Diamond Pacific Tool
Corporation, P. O. Box 1180, Barstow, CA 92312, 800-253-2954; (9) Covington Engineering
Corp., P. O. Box 35, Redlands, CA
92373, 877-793-6636; (10) ASW Diamond Trust, P.O. Box 116, Gorman, CA 93243, 800-8252792; (11) Electron Microscopy
Sciences, 321 Morris Rd. Box 251, Fort Washington, PA 19034, 800-523-5874; (12) Leco
Corporation, 3000 Lakeview Avenue, St.
Joseph, MI, 49085-2396, 269-983-5531; (13) Pace Technologies, 1802 W. Grant Rd. Suite
102, Tucson, AZ 85745, 888-PACE-654,
(14) Lapmaster International, 6400 West Oakton Street, Morton Grove, IL 60053, 877-3528637; (15) Hillquist Inc, 1144 S. Bannock
Street, Denver, CO 80223, 303-722-9766 (Tel), (16) Allied High Tech Products, Inc. 2376 East
Pacific Place, Rancho Dominguez, CA
90220, 800-675-1118; (17) Extec Corp. 99 Phoenix Avenue, P.O. Box 1258, Enfield, CT
06083-1258, 800-54-EXTEC.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
68
Table 6: Some common petrographic sample preparation steps for clinker, cement,
concrete, aggregate,
mortar, and other construction materials1
Sample Preparation Clinker Cement Aggregate
(after sieve
analysis)
Concrete and
Masonry
Units
Mortar Plaster and
Gypsum
Products
Washing and drying - - Optional Optional Drying Optional
Encapsulation 1A, B 1A, B 1A 1A, B
If fragile
1A
If fragile
1A If fragile
Vacuum Impregnation 2A, B 2A, B 2A 2A, B Of
trimmed or
impregnated
section
2A Of
trimmed or
impregnated
section
2A Of
trimmed or
impregnated
section
Sectioning/Trimming 3A, B 3A, B 3A 1A, B 3A 3A
Coarse Grinding (with
SiC/diamond grit)
4A, B 4A, B 4A 3A, B 4A 4A
Fine grinding (320 and
600 SiC/diamond grits)
5A, B 5A, B 5A 4A, B 5A 5A
Coarse Polishing (with
5-m Al2O3/diamond
abrasive on hard cloth)
6A 6A - 5A Optional Optional
Fine Polishing (with
0.3 and 0.05-m
Al2O3/diamond
abrasives on cloth)
7A 7A - 6A Optional Optional
Bonding to glass slide 6B 6B 6A 5B 6A 6A
Precision sectioning 7B 7B 7A 6B 7A 7A
Precision grinding
down to m-size
thickness
8B 8B 8A 7B 8A 8A
Coarse and fine
polishing of thin
sections
9B 9B - 8B Optional
Oil-immersion mounts 1C 1C Fine size, 1B 1C 1B 1B
Grain thin sections 1D 1D Fine size, 1C 1D 1C Grain mounts in epoxy 1E 1E Fine size, 1D 1E 1D Pulverization for XRD 1F Use as is 1E 1F 1E 1C
1A,
69
Ground sections 1 - - 2 2 1
Polished sections 2 1 - 1 - 1
Thin sections 2 - 1 - - 1
Grain thin sections - - 1 - - 1
Polished thin
sections - 1 1 1 - 1
Fluorescent
alcohol treated
ground sections
22---1
Fluorescent thin
sections - - 1 - - 1
1 = Primary method of examination, 2 = Secondary method of examination, Image analysis
system includes image
capture device (scanner, camera, digital camera, micro video camera) and an image
analysis software.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON CEMENT MICROSCOPY, DENVER, COLORADO, U.S.A., APRIL 30 MAY 4, 2006
70