Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
4, AUGUST 2015
1991
AbstractThis paper presents a new control strategy for a distributed static compensator (also known as distributed STATCOM
or DSTATCOM), congured to regulate the reactive (VAr) ow at
a point in a transmission system. This new control strategy takes
into account the operating VAr limits of that reactive ow in determining the steady-state output of the DSTATCOM. The new control strategy applies a slow reset regulator (SRR) to slowly bias
the VAr set point of the DSTATCOM master controller to maintain its steady-state output within a target bandwidth. The operating result maintains an appropriate VAr reserve level from the
DSTATCOM for dynamic events in the system. This paper also
presents a new algorithm to calculate the operating constraints of
the SRR that reect the VAr ow at the local or remote point in
the transmission system and the allowable VAr thresholds for that
ow. These allowable thresholds can be utilized to the full extent
to lower the steady-state output of the DSTATCOM, maximize its
VAr reserve for dynamic events and reduce equipment and associated system operating losses. Modeling, implementation, and simulation of an engineering project show that the new control strategy
and algorithm are functioning properly as expected.
Index TermsDistributed static compensators (Distributed
STATCOMs or DSTATCOMs), exible ac transmission systems
(FACTS), proportional-plus-integral (PI) controller, reactive
power regulator, slow reset regulator (SRR), slow susceptance regulator, static compensators (STATCOM), static VAr compensator
(SVC), VAr reserve regulator, voltage regulation.
I. INTRODUCTION
Manuscript received August 27, 2014; revised November 19, 2014; accepted
January 05, 2015. Date of publication January 09, 2015; date of current version
July 21, 2015. Paper no. TPWRD-01277-2014.
The authors are with S&C Electric Company, Franklin, WI 53132 USA
(e-mail: xiaokang.xu@sandc.com).
Color versions of one or more of the gures in this paper are available online
at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.
Digital Object Identier 10.1109/TPWRD.2015.2389621
1Flexible ac transmission systems (FACTS) generally include static
VAr compensators (SVCs), thyristor-controlled series capacitors/reactors
(TCSC/TCSRs), or static series synchronous condensers (SSSCs), static
compensators (STATCOMs), unied power-ow controllers (UPFCs), and
interline power-ow controllers (IPFCs).
0885-8977 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
1992
bipolar transistor
and then decreases to a new lower setpoint when three capacitor banks (green line) are switched in with a delay time of 10 s.
B. DSTATCOM Master Controller With the
-Control Mode
XU et al.: NEW CONTROL STRATEGY FOR DSTATCOMs CONSIDERING TRANSMISSION REACTIVE FLOW CONSTRAINTS
1993
Other Signals
(1)
where
troller,
Fig. 3. DSTATCOM master controller, slow reset regulator, and interface with
a transmission system.
3) the calculation of remote parameters using local measurements in a technique that is called line drop compensation
(LDC), when the remote measurements are unavailable.
The DSTATCOM master controller is based on a proportional-plus-integral (PI) controller with the operating limits
(
and
in Fig. 3) calculated based
on the operating point and short-time rating of the DSTATCOM.
This DSTATCOM master controller is also congured to control and coordinate the inverter output with switched shunt devices (SSDs). These devices include mechanically switched reactors (MSRs) located in the same plant location or mechanically controlled capacitors in a remote location (e.g., 230-kV
MSC in Fig. 3) for system reactive power and voltage support.
C. New Control Strategy and Modeling
The new control strategy applies the SRR to slowly bias the
VAr setpoint of the DSTATCOM operating in the -control
mode to maintain the steady-state output of the DSTATCOM
within a predened target bandwidth (i.e.,
in Fig. 3).
This new feature is different when compared to standard V-control-based SRR [1][3] that forces the output to zero independent of other observations. This new control strategy only allows the output to move toward zero within the operating range
of the VAr ow target level at the local or remote point. Other
transmission system constraints or generation sources may also
require the limitation of that VAr ow. The SRR addition allows
the DSTATCOM to work within the allowable range by moving
the operating output point toward a low target value. This can
minimize the steady-state output of the equipment and associated operating losses and maximize the VAr reserve for dynamic
events in the transmission system.
The -control-based SRR, as used in the new control
strategy, is essentially a proportional-integral (PI) controller
with varying control or operation constraints (
,
in Fig. 3) as determined or calculated by the allowable VAr
is the input to the DSTATCOM master conis the VAr setpoint for the DSTATCOM,
is the actual VAr ow at the remote point in the transis the output of
mission system (e.g., at the POI),
the SRR for biasing the VAr setpoint of the DSTATCOM, and
other signals (which may include the system voltage and real
power at the local or remote point or the status of the remote
230-kV MSC, etc.).
The tuning of this PI controller and calculation of its operation constraints are important for SRR operation. In general, the
PI controller parameters are tuned such that the SRR begins to
regulate over a relatively long period of time after system dynamics (caused by faults, line trips, loss of renewable or conventional generation, etc.) have passed and the system has almost
settled down to a new operating point. The operating constraints
are determined and calculated based on the allowable VAr ow
thresholds and the actual VAr ow at the remote point in the
system, which is described in the next subsection.
D. New Algorithm for the Calculation of SRR Operation
Constraints
The
(7)
where
1)
and
are upper and lower VAr
ow limiting values at the POI;
2)
is the actual VAr ow at the POI;
1994
Fig. 5. DSTATCOM output response without with the slow reset regulator after
a step change (Increase) in the setpoint (red without the SRR; green with
the SRR).
3)
and
are the differences
between the upper or lower VAr ow tolerance and the
actual VAr ow at the POI;
4)
and
are the upper and lower SRR operation constraints.
III. IMPLEMENTATION, SIMULATIONS, AND CASE STUDIES
XU et al.: NEW CONTROL STRATEGY FOR DSTATCOMs CONSIDERING TRANSMISSION REACTIVE FLOW CONSTRAINTS
Fig. 6. DSTATCOM output response without with the slow reset regulator after
a step change (Decrease) in the setpoint (red without the SRR; green
with the SRR).
1995
Fig. 8. VAr ow responses at the POI without the SRR (red Case 1) and with
the SRR (green Case 2; blue Case 3; black Case 4).
TABLE I
SUMMARY OF SIMULATION RESULTS
Fig. 10. Postcontingency power ow with the slow reset regulator (Case 2,
25 MVAr).
allowable VAr ow thresholds at the
DSTATCOM output is adjusted by the SRR, which is functioning as expected. The details of postcontingency power ows
are shown in Figs. 712 and will be discussed.
1996
Fig. 11. Postcontingency power ow with the slow reset regulator (Case 3,
10 MVAr).
allowable VAr ow thresholds at the POI
POI is 15.5 MVAr (Fig. 10). Thus, the benet of using the
allowable VAr ow thresholds is that the steady-state output
of the DSTATCOM and its associated operating losses can be
minimized, and the VAr reserve from the equipment can be
maximized for dynamic events in the system.
When the actual VAr ow is at the threshold, the operation
constraints of the SRR would be zero according to (2)(7) in
Section II-D. Thus, there is no regulation room for the SRR
and it stops regulation, and the DSTATCOM output settles at
the value corresponding to the VAr ow threshold at the POI.
This is shown in Cases 3 and 4 where the DSTATCOM settles
at 2.5 MVAr and 4.2 MVAr, respectively, and the VAr ow at the
POI is 9.9 MVAr and 5.1 MVAr, respectively (Figs. 11 and 12).
As long as the VAR ow thresholds are nonzero, the benet of
the SRR regulation can be seen because the DSTATCOM does
not need to operate at the full capacitive or inductive output, a
condition with little dynamic VAr reserve that usually causes
the highest operating losses.
These case studies further show that the -control-based
SRR is functioning properly as expected under either the
nonlimiting or limiting VAr ow condition at the POI.
IV. CONCLUSION
Fig. 12. Postcontingency power ow with the slow reset regulator (Case 4,
5 MVAr).
allowable VAr ow thresholds at the
XU et al.: NEW CONTROL STRATEGY FOR DSTATCOMs CONSIDERING TRANSMISSION REACTIVE FLOW CONSTRAINTS
REFERENCES
[1] R. M. Mathur and R. K. Varma, Thyristor-Based FACTS Controllers
for Eletrical Transmission Systems. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2002,
IEEE.
[2] N. G. Hingorani and L. Gyugyi, Understanding FACTS: Concepts and
Technology of Flexible AC Transmission Systems. Piscataway, NJ,
USA: IEEE, 2000.
[3] WECC Static VAr Compensator Task Force, Generic static
VAr system models for the Western Electricity Coordinating
Council, Rep. no. 4/18/11, Apr. 18, 2011. [Online]. Available:
https://www.wecc.biz/Reliability/GenericStaticVarSystemModelsforWECC.pdf
[4] Y. Xu and F. Li, Adaptive PI control of STATCOM for voltage regulation, IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 10021011, Jun.
2014.
[5] S. Kincic, X. (G.) T. Wan, D. T. McGillis, A. Chandra, B.-T. Ooi, F.
D. Galiana, and G. Joos, Voltage support by distributed Static VAr
Systems (SVS), IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 20, no. 2, pt. 2, pp.
15411549, Apr. 2005.
[6] Jain, K. Joshi, A. Behal, and N. Mohan, Voltage regulation with
STATCOMs: Modeling, control and results, IEEE Trans. Power Del.,
vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 726735, Apr. 2006.
[7] D. Soto and R. Pena, Nonlinear control strategies for cascaded
multilevel STATCOMs, IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 19, no. 4, pp.
19191927, Oct. 2004.
[8] C. Hochgraf and R. H. Lasseter, STATCOM controls for operation
with unbalanced voltage, IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 13, no. 2, pp.
538544, Apr. 1998.
[9] A. H. Norouzi and A. M. Sharaf, Two control schemes to enhance
the dynamic performance of the STATCOM and SSSC, IEEE Trans.
Power Del., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 435442, Jan. 2005.
[10] V. Spitsa, A. Alexandrovitz, and E. Zeheb, Design of a robust state
feedback controller for a STATCOM using a zero set concept, IEEE
Trans. Power Del. , vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 456467, Jan. 2010.
[11] L. Wang and D. Truong, Dynamic stability improvement of four parallel-operated PMSG-based offshore wind turbine generators fed to a
power system using a STATCOM, IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 28,
no. 1, pp. 111119, Jan. 2013.
[12] C. Wang, X. Yin, Z. Zhang, and M. Wen, A novel compensation technology of static synchronous compensator integrated with distribution
transformer, IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 10321039,
Apr. 2013.
[13] J. M. Bloemink and T. C. Green, Benets of distribution-level power
electronics for supporting distributed generation growth, IEEE Trans.
Power Del., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 911919, Apr. 2013.
[14] T. Aziz, M. J. Hossain, T. K. Saha, and N. Mithulananthan, VAR planning with tuning of STATCOM in a DG integrated industrial system,
IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 875885, Apr. 2013.
[15] S. Du and J. Liu, A study on dc voltage control for chopper-cell-based
modular multilevel converters in d-STATCOM application, IEEE
Trans. Power Del., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 20302038, Oct. 2013.
[16] L. M. Castro, E. Acha, and C. Fuerte-Esquivel, A novel STATCOM
model for dynamic power system simulations, IEEE Trans. Power
Syst., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 31453154, Aug. 2013.
[17] M. S. E. Moursi and A. M. Sharaf, Novel controllers for the 48-pulse
VSC STATCOM and SSSC for voltage regulation and reactive
power compensation, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 20, no. 4, pp.
19851997, Nov. 2005.
[18] G. E. Valdarannma, P. Mattavalli, and A. M. Stankonic, Reactive
power and unbalance compensation using STATCOM with dissipativity based control, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 19, no.
5, pp. 598608, Sep. 2001.
[19] A. Luo, C. Tang, Z. Shuai, J. Tang, X. Y. Xu, and D. Chen, Fuzzy-PIbased direct-output-voltage control strategy for the STATCOM used in
utility distribution systems, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 56, no. 1,
pp. 24012411, Jul. 2009.
[20] A. Khodabakhshian, M. J. Morshed, and M. Parastegari, Coordinated
design of STATCOM and excitation system controllers for multi- machine power systems using zero dynamics method, Int. J. Elect. Power
Energy Syst., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 269279, 2013.
1997
[21] C. Wessels, N. Hoffmann, M. Molinas, and F. W. Fuchs, StatCom control at wind farms with xed-speed induction generators under asymmetrical grid faults, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 60, no. 7, pp.
28642873, Jul. 2013.
[22] H. Mehrjerdi, E. Ghahremani, S. Lefebvre, M. Saad, and D. Asber,
Authenticated voltage control of partitioned power networks with optimal allocation of STATCOM using heuristic algorithm, IET Gen.,
Transm. Distrib., vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 10371045, 2013.
[23] S. Li, L. Xu, and T. A. Haskew, Control of VSC-based STATCOM
using conventional and direct-current vector control strategies, Int. J.
Elect. Power Energy Syst., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 175186, 2013.
[24] T. Lee, S. Hu, and Y. Chan, D-STATCOM with positive-sequence admittance and negative-sequence conductance to mitigate voltage uctuations in high-level penetration of distributed-generation systems,
IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 14171428, Apr. 2013.
[25] V. Pant, B. Das, and A. Bhargava, Periodic output feedback technique
based design of STATCOM damping controller, Int. J. Elect. Power
Energy Syst., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 344350, 2012.
[26] B. Rajani and P. S. Raju, Comparison of facts controllers for improvement of voltage/line stability in transmission system using SSSC
STATCOM, J. Theoret. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 7179,
2012.
[27] T. Tummala and K. Vaisakh, Design and Performance Evaluation of
STATCOM Supplementary Modulation Controller in Power Systems,
Int. J. Emerging Elect. Power Syst., vol. 13, no. 2, 2012.
[28] X. Xu, M. Bishop, E. Camm, and M. Edmonds, Transmission voltage
support using distributed static compensation, presented at the IEEE
Power Energy Soc. Gen. Meeting, National Harbor, MD, USA, Jul.
2731, 2014.
[29] P. Hassink, D. Matthews, R. O'Keefe, F. Howell, S. Arabi, C. Edwards,
and E. Camm, Dynamic reactive compensation system for wind generation hub, in Proc. IEEE Power Energy Soc. Power Syst. Conf.
Expo., Atlanta, GA, USA, Oct. 29Nov. 1, 2006, pp. 470475.
[30] PSSE Rev 32.0.5 Program Operation Manual and Model Library,
Siemens PTI, 2010.
Xiaokang Xu (SM00) received the B.S. degree in
electrical engineering from Southeast University,
Nanjing, China, in 1982, the M.S. degree in electrical
engineering from the Graduate School of China
Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing, China, in
1984, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering
from the University of Western Ontario, London,
ON, Canada, in 1999.
Currently, he is a Principal Engineer of the
Global Strategic Studies Group at S&C Electric Co.,
Franklin, WI, USA. Previously, he was with China
Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing, China; Ontario Hydro, Toronto,
ON, Canada; CAE Electronics Ltd., Montreal, QC, Canada; and Power
Technologies Inc. (PTI and now Siemens PTI), Schenectady, NY, USA. His
primary work areas include modeling, simulation, and application of exible
ac transmission systems devices and energy-storage systems, transmission
voltage stability analysis, transmission planning and reliability assessment, and
renewable energy integration.
1998
Donna G. Oikarinen (M93) received the B.Sc. degree in electrical engineering from Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.
Currently, she is Senior Electrical Engineer,
Global Strategic Studies Group, S&C Electric
Company, Franklin, WI USA, where she has been
since 2011, working on power system and harmonic
studies to analyze systems for capacity, stability,
transfer capability, power quality, renewable energy
interconnections, and applications for reactive
compensation systems and large energy-storage
applications using S&C inverter-based products. Prior to S&C, she was with
AMSC in the Network Planning and Applications Group, Wisconsin Public
Service Corp., in the areas of transmission planning, substation engineering,
and distribution planning and operations.
Ms. Oikarinen is a member of Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu, Omicron Delta
Kappa, and the IEEE Power Engineering Society.