Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Serge LE NEVE
E-mail : Serge.le-neve@dga.defense.gouv.fr
Various test methods, standards or guides are used to assess the fire behaviour
of various components used in fire zones
9 Aircraft Material Fire Test Handbook :
Chapter 12 is used to determine the capability of components & constructions to control the
passage of fire or its effects in powerplant compartments,
9 AC 20.135 :
Guidance to demonstrate the compliance with the powerplant fire protection requirements of the
FAR (materials & components used in engines & APU installations and in areas adjacent to fire
zones).
9 ISO 2685 :
Test procedure for airborne equipments to assess the fire resistance of components, equipments &
structures located in fire zones.
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
2 / 26
Various methods of Heat Flux calibration are specified to set the burners
9 Aircraft Material Fire Test Handbook Chapters 11 & 12 :
requirement : > 10.6 W/cm (9.3 Btu/ft.s) or > 4500 Btu/hr
Heat Flux density is measured by a water-cooled calorimeter
Power is measured by the heat transfer device
9 AC 20.135 : requirement : > 10.6 W/cm (9.3 Btu/ft.s) or > 4500 Btu/hr
Parameters are measured by the heat transfer device or calorimeter. AC 20.135 does not clearly specify if
the heat flux density must be measured from a water-cooled calorimeter or if it can be calculated from
the power measured by the heat transfer device.
9 ISO 2685 : requirement : 11.6 W/cm (+/- 1 W/cm)
The Heat Flux density is calculated from the heat transfer device (the total heat recorded by the heat
transfer device is supposed to come from the surface of the tube in front of the burner exit).
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
3 / 26
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
4 / 26
2 inches
Oil Burner
Gas Burner
FAR / CS
(Handbook / AC 20-135)
4 (101,6 mm)
2 (50,8 mm)
ISO 2685
Env 75 mm (3)
3 inches
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
5 / 26
To test the same kind of components used in the same area (fire zones) :
Several standards or guidance providing :
2 different methods of heat flux calibration,
2 different burners,
Various test configuration (positions of the burner)
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
Fire resistant : 5 mn
Fireproof : 15 mn
6 / 26
Experiences with the Park burner has shown the difficulty to obtain the same test
results using only one type of burner
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
7 / 26
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
8 / 26
Test Program
Tested samples
-Simulating critical areas to be
tested
-Sizes of the samples / critical
areas were in accordance with
all test methods (< 2xSburner)
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
9 / 26
Flame calibrations
T Gas Burner
1200
1100
T Oil Burner
1000
900
TH1 (C)
Temprature (C)
800
TH2 (C)
700
TH3 (C)
600
TH4 (C)
TH5 (C)
500
1200
TH6 (C)
400
1100
TH7 (C)
1000
300
900
200
TH1 (C)
0
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
Tem ps (s)
Temprature (C)
800
100
TH2 (C)
700
TH3 (C)
600
TH4 (C)
TH5 (C)
500
TH6 (C)
400
TH7 (C)
300
200
100
0
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
Tem ps (s)
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
10 / 26
Flame calibrations
13
12
11
Flux (W/cm)
10
13
12
11
5
30
60
90
Tem ps (s)
120
150
180
10
Flux (W/cm)
(L=280mm)
5
0
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
30
60
90
Tem ps (s)
120
150
11 / 26
180
Gas Burner
Oil Burner
Oil Burner
Melting (s)
290
Burnthrough (s)
> 600
309
> 600
315
> 600
Alumina
sheet
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
Gas Burner
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
4mn41s
Fail
7mn16s
Pass
4mn06s
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
4mn41s
Fail
4mn35s
Fail
4mn06s
Fail
4mn50s
Fail
5mn09s
Pass
5mn25s
Pass
281
281
Behaviour at 10mn
Burnthrough
4mn41s
Fail
7mn16s
Fail
4mn06s
Fail
Pass
Pass
Pass
275
436
246
246
Melting (s)
Burnthrough (s)
12 / 26
308
Pass : 3
samples
250
200
(s)
Fail
150
+ 40s (+ 15%)
Pass
Fail : 2
samples
100
50
0
Oil Burner
Gas Burner
Melted areas
Gas Burner
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
Oil Burner
13 / 26
failure time :
Failure time :
1mn 42 s
1mn 10 s
(+45 %)
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
14 / 26
Comparaison
AC
20-135 / ISO
des
2685
brleurs gaz / krosne
Comparison
ISO 2685
of gas burner to oil burner
Tests on Essai
2024 aluminium
sur cadre Alu
former
2024 (p.
ISO 5mm)
2685 standard
dist. Burner = 4 inches
thickness=5 mm
Failure time : fall of the bolt
Failure time :
> 15 mn
Failure time :
4 mn 45 s
Pass
Fail
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
15 / 26
Comparaison
AC
20-135 / ISO
des
2685
brleurs gaz / krosne
Comparison
ISO 2685
of gas burner to oil burner
Essai
Comparison
sur cadre Alu
of failure
2024 (p.
times
5mm)
Comparison of Failure Times
> 600s
500
450
Oil Burner
> 900s
> + 87 %
> + 200 %
Gas Burner
400
350
+ 15 %
Time (s)
300
250
308
321
Fire resistant
285
268
200
+ 46 %
150
102
100
70
50
0
Plate (melting)
Plate
(burnthrough)
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
Tube
Former
16 / 26
(d = 2 inches)
Cartographie de flux sur une ligne du brleur gaz horizontal 2 pouces - 10/09/08
12
11
10
9
Flux (W/cm)
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
-30
-20
-10
10
20
30
Position (cm )
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
17 / 26
Comparaison
AC
20-135 / ISO
des
2685
brleurs gaz / krosne
Comparison
ISO 2685
of gas burner to oil burner
Failure Time :
> 15 mn
Fire resistant (5mn) : Pass
Fireproof (15mn) : Pass
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
(d = 2 inches)
Failure Time :
5 mn 13 s
Fire resistant (5mn) : Fail
Fireproof (15mn) : Pass
Failure Time :
4 mn 45 s
Fire resistant (5mn) : Fail
Fireproof (15mn) : Fail
18 / 26
Comparaison
AC
20-135 / ISO
des
2685
brleurs gaz / krosne
Comparison
ISO 2685
of gas burner to oil burner
Essai
Comparison
sur cadre Alu
of failure
2024 (p.
times
5mm)
> 600s
> 900s
> + 87 %
> + 200 %
ISO gas burner at d = 3 inches
+ 15 %
Fire resistant
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
19 / 26
Cartographie ligne centrale du brleur gaz vertical avec rglages ISO2685, distance 75 m m
1500
15
1400
1300
14
13
12
1200
11
1000
10
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
3
2
200
100
1
0
0
-40
-30
-20
-10
10
Position (cm )
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
20
30
40
Flux (W/cm)
Temprature (C)
1100
20 / 26
Com parison Gas Burner / Oil Burner setted according to ISO 2685
HEATFLUX DENSITY (w ater cooled Heatfluxm eter)
Oil Burner : Horizontal line - 4 inches from the burner (H test)
Gas Burner : 3 inches above the burner (V test)
12
11
10
Flux (W/cm)
9
8
7
6
5
Park Oil Burner setted according to the ISO 2685 (11,6 (+/- 1) W/cm (Heat transfert device))
4
3
2
1
0
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
10
12
12
Position (cm )
11
10
Flux (W/cm)
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
-13 -12 -11 -10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
Position (cm )
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
21 / 26
10
11
12
13
700
600
500
Gas Burner
Temprature (C)
TH1 (C)
TH2 (C)
400
TH3 (C)
TH4 (C)
300
TH5 (C)
TH6 (C)
200
100
7 cm
S : ~ 28 inch
(>5x5)
60
120
180
240
300
360
420
480
540
600
660
720
780
840
900
960
Tem ps (s)
Tem pratures pendant therm ographie IR avec brleur krosne sur tle acier 500*500*3m m - 04/08/08
7 cm
700
600
500
TH1 (C)
Temprature (C)
Oil Burner
TH2 (C)
400
TH3 (C)
TH4 (C)
300
TH5 (C)
TH6 (C)
200
100
0
0
60
120
180
240
300
360
420
480
540
600
660
720
780
840
900
960
Tem ps (s)
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
22 / 26
Oil Burner 1 mn
Gas Burner 1 mn
Oil Burner 3 mn
Gas Burner 3 mn
Oil Burner 5 mn
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
Gas Burner 5 mn
23 / 26
Conclusion 1
Within the ISO 2685 standard, the gas burner flame is always less severe than the oil
burner flame,
Heat flux methods of measurement are not equivalent and the values of heat flux
calibrations must not be compared,
When the gas burner and oil burner are calibrated according to the ISO standard, their
flames are not in accordance with the Handbook / AC 20-135 requirements,
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
24 / 26
Conclusion 2
Gas burner :
Practical aspect : Should not be used on medium size items under the Handbook test
configuration (d=2 inches) (too close to the burner => possible burner damages (heat
concentration radiation from the sample)
When this burner is used, as specified in the various standards it should be used only
on small critical parts
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
25 / 26
Conclusion 3
As the ISO standard is often used in substitution with the FAA guidances and as the gas
burner can be less severe than the oil burner :
The ISO 2685 standard and (or) the Handbook / AC should be revised to fix all these
anomalies
As the ISO 2685 is currently under discussion within the TC20 ISO committee, the
french mirror committee will probably ask for a complete review
MINISTRE DE LA DFENSE
26 / 26