Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PERSPECTIVE
The official online newsletter of Tanzeem e Islami
Uploaded twice a month to www. Tanzeem.org
Volume 2, Issue 16
16 August 31 August, 2016
TANZEEM E ISLAMI
PERSPECTIVE
EDITORIAL
Editorial
2&4 All praise is due to Allah (SWT), and peace & blessing on his noble
Press Releases issued by
Messengers (AS), in particular, on the last of them all the blessed Prophet
Tanzeem e Islami
3
Muhammad (SAAW).
Cyber-crime bill passed
4
Patron:
Hafiz Aakif Saeed
Chief Editor: Dr. Absar Ahmad
Editor:
Raza ul Haq
This is the question that has riddled many a mind since the National
Assembly (NA) of Pakistan passed the amended Cyber-crime Bill, 2016
after it had been scaled down by the Senate by making 55 amendments to
the original bill submitted to the upper house of the parliament for approval
by the NA in April 2015. While making the amendments to the original
document, the senate committee suggested that it was doing so to protect
the rights of people as guaranteed in the 1973 Constitution of the Islamic
Republic of Pakistan.
While we do agree in principle that cyber-crime has been on the rise all over
the globe and there is a need to ensure that criminal and terrorist activities
do not prosper in cyberspace, it is equally imperative that legislation of such
critical nature is done by due process and by taking all stakeholders on
board. Moreover, every law MUST include adequate checks and balances
to avoid, or at least restrict, any chances of abuse of power. All laws also
ought to be all-embracing and inclusive, without prejudice against certain
criminal acts, while ignoring other, equally pervasive crimes.
(Surah Al-Maida: 48-part) The detailed study of the Cyber-crime Bill, 2016 reveals that it clearly lacks
Selected Hadith:
Narrated
(RA):
Awf
ibn
(Sahih Muslim)
(Continued on page 4)
Page 3
PERSPECTIVE
Follow us:
@tanzeemorg
https://www.facebook.com/Tanzeem.org
PERSPECTIVE
Page 4
Editorial
b. The definitions of terminologies used in Chapter II of the bill such as act, access to data, access to
information systems, unauthorized access, interference with information system or data, critical
infrastructure, data damage and dishonest intention. None of these terms have been clearly defined
and as a result can be interpreted to include many things, and literally anything, should the State choose
to criminalize a particular action, person, group of people or organization, in particular the religious
organizations operating peacefully in Pakistan.
We sincerely hope and pray that the policy-makers in Pakistan review the bill to remove all inadequacies
in it before promulgating it as a law and make it an example of fair, just and equitable piece of legislation.
After all, laws ought to be made for the benefit of the general public; not for bullying them!
Signing off
Focus of criticism
1. Critics say the bill is too harsh, with punishments that do not fit crimes;
2. The bill's language leaves it open to abuse by LEAs, agencies and the government;
3. Recommendations of stakeholders were ignored in the formulation of the law;
4. The bill is silent about the crime of spreading blasphemous content as a cyber-offence;
5. The bill is extremely vague about the definition of obscenity and while it does talk about childpornography as an offence, it totally ignores the spread of pornographic content in general as an
offence;
6. The bill does not place sufficient burden of responsibility on Service providers for curbing the
dissemination of in-appropriate content;
7. The bill restricts freedom of expression and access to information;
8. The offences are too numerous and many of them overlap with other existing laws;
9. The wording of the bill leaves many clauses open to interpretation;
10. The bill can be misused to target religious organizations, journalists sources and whistleblowers;
11. Criteria for surveillance is even more open-ended than in the Fair Trial Act 2013;
12. Mechanisms for streamlining the implementation of the bill in its various dimensions and in
accordance with existing laws appear to be vaguely described in the bill;
13. The authority designated under the new law should have been independent of the executive;
14. The authority has been given sweeping powers to block and destroy online material, without a
court order; and
15. The bill does not adequately define the context and scope of international cooperation when
dealing with offences that amount to a cyber-crime.
Note: This is not an exhaustive list of the criticism against the bill. A full text copy of the Bill can be viewed at the link below.
https://www.scribd.com/document/320884537/PECB-bill-Senate#from_embed
Source adapted from: Reported by Raza Hassan for Dawn.com;
used by the Perspective Team with due editorial discretion
Markaz Tanzeem e Islami, 67-A, Allama Iqbal Road, Garhi Shahu, Lahore. 54000