Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Introduction
Conceptual Vision
Well Challenges
Well Design
(Load cases
Environment )
Exploration Drilling
(Associated
services)
Casing +
Cementing
Completion
Production
etc
Federico Daguerre
Introduction
Conceptual Vision
Well Challenges
Well Design
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
(Load cases
Environment )
Casing +
Cementing
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
rfo ter tion
s
rm ial
an
ce
9Fluid dynamics
or
ki
ng
(Associated
services)
9Thermal profile
W
Exploration Drilling
materials
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin Life ncy
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
9Multiaxial Loads
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
Completion
Production
etc
Federico Daguerre
Introduction
From needs to requirements
Well Challenges
Well Design
Casing +
Cementing
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
rfo ter tion
s
rm ial
an
ce
NACE MR0175
/ISO15156
or
ki
ng
(Associated
services)
Mechanical
Properties
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin Life ncy
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
Exploration Drilling
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
(Load cases
Environment )
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
Completion
Production
etc
Federico Daguerre
Introduction
From needs to requirements
Well Challenges
Well Design
Casing +
Cementing
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
rfo ter tion
s
rm ial
an
ce
NACE MR0175
/ISO15156
or
ki
ng
(Associated
services)
Mechanical
Properties
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin Life ncy
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
Exploration Drilling
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
(Load cases
Environment )
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
Completion
Production
etc
Federico Daguerre
Material Performance
Material Properties
Federico Daguerre
Material Performance
Material Properties
40 45 50 55 60 65
Group I
H40
70
75
80
85
90
95
100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150
Max HRC
J55 - K 55
N80 Type1 & N80Q
Group II
22
M65
23
L80
25,4
C90
C95
T95
Group III
P110
Group IV
25,4
Q125
Federico Daguerre
Material Performance
Material Properties
or
ki
ng
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
t
rfo er tion
s
rm ial
an
ce
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
Mechanical
Properties
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin
fe ncy
i
L
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
Federico Daguerre
Material Performance
Federico Daguerre
Material Performance
Federico Daguerre
10
Material Performance
Material Properties
or
ki
ng
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
t
rfo er tion
s
rm ial
an
ce
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
Mechanical
Properties
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin
fe ncy
i
L
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
Federico Daguerre
11
Material Performance
Sulfide Stress Cracking Resistance
Federico Daguerre
12
Material Performance
Sulfide Stress Cracking Resistance
or
ki
ng
W
Mechanical
Properties
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin
fe ncy
i
L
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
t
rfo er tion
s
rm ial
an
ce
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
Federico Daguerre
13
Material Performance
Sulfide Stress Cracking Resistance
Factors interacting in the performance of steels
1. Chemical composition, method of manufacture, product form, strength,
hardness of the material and its local variations, amount of cold work,
heat-treatment condition, microstructure, microstructural uniformity,
grain size and cleanliness of the material;
2.
Federico Daguerre
14
Material Performance
Sulfide Stress Cracking Resistance
H2S pp > 0,3Kpa (0,05psi)
Federico Daguerre
15
Material Performance
Material Properties
Federico Daguerre
16
Material Performance
Material Properties
Supplementary
Requirements
Product specification
Level
Mechanical Properties
Statistical testing
NDT acceptance criteria
Inspection Frequencies
Federico Daguerre
17
Material Performance
Structural Performance
or
ki
ng
W
Mechanical
Properties
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin
fe ncy
i
L
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
t
rfo er tion
s
rm ial
an
ce
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
Federico Daguerre
18
Material Performance
Structural Performance
or
ki
ng
W
Mechanical
Properties
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin
fe ncy
i
L
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
t
rfo er tion
s
rm ial
an
ce
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
Federico Daguerre
19
Material Performance
Structural Performance
Federico Daguerre
20
Material Performance
Structural Performance
Federico Daguerre
21
Material Performance
Structural Performance
Internal Pressure
_ Ys
Ys
Compression
Tension
External Yield
External Pressure
23 May 2011
Federico Daguerre
22
Material Performance
Structural Performance
Federico Daguerre
23
Material Performance
Structural Performance
Federico Daguerre
24
Material Performance
Structural Performance
or
ki
ng
W
Mechanical
Properties
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin
fe ncy
i
L
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
t
rfo er tion
s
rm ial
an
ce
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
Federico Daguerre
25
Material Performance
Structural Performance
Federico Daguerre
26
Material Performance
Structural Performance
Federico Daguerre
27
Validation Tests
GALLING RESISTANCE
ISO 13679 Galling Evaluation & Seal capacity under combined loads
Specimen preparation
Specimen 1
Specimen 2
Specimen 3
Thread-seal interference
H-L
L-L
H-H
Thread taper
PSBF
PSBF
NOM-NOM
PFBS
MU (A)
MU (A)
MU (A)
7.2.2
7.2.2
7.2.2
H/L
H/H
H/H
RRG (B)
7.2.4
L/H
Make and
Specimen 4
Specimen 5
Specimen 6
Specimen 7
H-L
L-H
L-H
PSBF
PSBF
PFBS
PFBS
MU (A)
MU (A)
MU (A)
MU (A)
MU (A)
7.2.2
7.2.2
7.2.2
7.2.2
7.2.2
H/H
H/L
H/H
H/L
H/L
RRG (B)
RRG (B)
RRG (B)
7.2.4
7.2.4
7.2.4
L/H
L/H
L/H
L-H
H-L
8 SPECIMENS
Specimen 8
break properties
Amount thread
compound/torque shown in
each block
MBG (B)
MBG (B)
MBG (B)
MBG (B)
7.2.3
7.2.3
7.2.3
7.2.3
L/H
L/H
L/H
L/H
FMU (B)
FMU (B)
FMU (B)
FMU (B)
FMU (B)
FMU (B)
FMU (B)
7.2.5
7.2.5
7.2.5
7.2.5
7.2.5
7.2.5
7.2.5
7.2.5
H/L
H/H
H/H
H/H
H/L
H/H
H/L
H/L
Bake
Bake
Bake
Bake
Bake
Bake
Bake
Bake
Bake
7.3.2
7.3.2
7.3.2
7.3.2
7.3.2
7.3.2
7.3.2
7.3.2
T/C pi/po
T/C pi/po
T/C pi/po
T/C pi/po
7.3.3
7.3.3
7.3.3
7.3.3
COMBINED
LOADS
FMU (B)
Series A
Series B
T/C pi w B
T/C pi w B
T/C pi w B
7.3.4
7.3.4
7.3.4
7.3.4
Thermal Cycle
7.3.5
Thermal Cycle
7.3.5
Thermal Cycle
7.3.5
Thermal Cycle
7.3.5
Failure test
pih+T to F
Failure test
C+po to F
Failure test
CAL
Failure test
po+C to F
Failure test
T+pi to F
IV & III
7.5.1
7.5.2
7.5.3
Path No.
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
Series C
Structural tests
th
T/C pi w B
T to F
FAILURE
TESTS7.5.5
7.5.4
Federico Daguerre
Failure test
pi+C to F
Failure test
po to F
Failure test
pil+T to F
7.5.6
7.5.7
7.5.8
P6
P7
P8
28
Material Performance
Structural Performance
Load Points
Collapse Pressure
15.0
95% VMES
Pressure [ksi]
-3,000
10.0
5.0
0.0
-2,000
-1,000
1,000
2,000
3,000
-5.0
-10.0
-15.0
-20.0
Test Failure
Federico Daguerre
29
Conclusions
From needs to requirements
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
rfo ter tion
i
s
rm al
an
ce
or
ki
ng
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin
fe ncy
i
L
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
Federico Daguerre
30
Sansana Malaiarisoon
Assistant Manager - Corporate Responsibility
Chevron Thailand Exploration and Production, Ltd.
4th Petroleum Forum
May 27, 2011
2010 Chevron
May 2011
Outline
I.
II.
2010 Chevron
Complimentary Initiatives
I.
Project Rationale
2010 Chevron
I.
2010 Chevron
Chevrons Vision : to be the energy company most admired for its people, partnership and performance
Chevrons OEMS Vision : to be recognized and admired by industry and local communities for its world-class performance on safety, health, the
environment, reliability and efficiency
Phase 2 :
Phase 3 :
Phase 4 :
Phase 5 :
Opportunity
Develop
Alternatives
Develop
Preferred
Alternative
Execute
Operate
and
Evaluate
Acceptance /
EIA submission
Commitment /
EIA/HIA and Permit
approval
Understanding
Monitoring
and
Evaluation
Awareness
2008
2010
Continual
Improvement
2013
People
Engaged with
27
440
2,258
Attitude Survey
467
In Depth Interview
1,147
18,655
86
2,706
213
368
> 10,000
11
343
Within
5 km Radius
Regular Visits
Stakeholder
Engagement
Beyond
5 km Radius
2010 Chevron
Regular Visits
Open House Trips
Committed to
companys
vision & the
Chevron Way
Sincere &
Respectful to
community
opinions
Transparent &
easily
accessible
2010 Chevron
Strategy
Lessons
Lessons Learned
Learned &
& Share
Share Information
Information with
with Project
Project
Team
Team
Principles
Outcomes
Community Participation from inception
of the project
Community needs/concerns &
suggestions revealed and listened to
2010 Chevron
2010 Chevron
With the new design, fishing boats can go under the jetty, alleviating any
obstruction and the public beach is no longer obstructed
2010 Chevron
10
2010 Chevron
11
12
2010 Chevron
13
No. of participants
(1,600 PAX)
1.
2010 Chevron
14
2.
3.
4.
2010 Chevron
15
2010 Chevron
16
Presentation Outline
How
X
Seismic and well integration for well placement , interpretation and reservoir mapping
Pattani
Basin
Jasmine
field
Reserves
X
2P
2P
1P
latf
or
latf
or
ms
latf
or
ms
WPD
WPB
WPB
WPA
WPA
WPC
WPC
BYA
BYA
PHIE
C20
PSTM_FINAL_NO_WHITING
C20
Strong correlation between seismic and net sand observed from existing wells
Net Sand map is conditioned by seismic attribute
Reservoir Mapping
D24
D24
D24ST
Existing penetration
Existing penetration
i i f
WPA
C16
C22
TD @ 11077ftMD
TD @ 10343ftMD
Infill drilling
WPC
50 Reservoir Interval
140
HS
Intra HS
50
680
B15ST
B20
660
640-2
Infill drilling
B15ST
N
680
660
640-2
Increasing oil recovery of reservoirs with defined fluid contacts through horizontal wells
B20
BYA04
BYA-09
Infill drilling
BYA-04
D-17
D-16
D-14
C16 Periscope
ICD - BYA-09
Integration of Static and Dynamic data to develop
full field reservoir model
Seismic,
Exploration,
Appraisal
Raw Data
Hierarchical
Rock Model
Property
Model
UpUp-scaled
Simulation
Model
Next step is to apply the static and dynamic modelling for evaluation of the potential
for IOR -- specifically utilizing produced water for water-flooding 050 reservoir.
Acknowledgements
Val Kienast (Co-Author)
Piyatad Tabmanee
Jasmine PE
Theeranun Limniyakul
Jasmine PE
Carlos Rodriguez
Jasmine Senior PE
Fred Houtzager
Christopher Platt
Chief Petrophysicist
Jason McClure
Chris Oglesby
Chief Geologist
David Carter
Chief Geophysicist
Mike Pine
VP Development
Ian Anderson
Senior VP Exploration
David Johnson
President
20
The End
21
C17
7 wells drilled
6 wells completed
C22
C20
Oil Producer
C21
C19
Well
Fault Block
Sands
Initial Rate/Status
C-17
Del-6B
390/50
180/336
>650
C-18
Del-6C
50
250/156
C-19
Del-6D
HS
200/200
530
C-20
Del-6
245/200/HS/50
125/170
190
C-21
216/0
P&A
HS/50(Gas/Wet)
C-22(H)
Jas A_CW
50
230/321
>600
C-23(H)
Jas A_East
50
275/To be evaluated
500
23
BYA09
BYA24
BYA10
Well
Fault Block
Ban Yen
BYA23
Oil Producer
Sands
Initial Rate/Status
BYA-9(H)
Main
250
300/300
1370 (ESP)
BYA-10
South
245/200/180/160
240/470
500 (ESP)
BYA-23
South/BY2D
460/50
330/316
620 (ESP)
BYA-24
Main
540/50
300/To be evaluated