Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
April 2013
DRAFTS IN
WIDE CIRCULATION
DOCUMENT DESPATCH ADVICE
Reference
Date
CED 38/T-6
22 04 2013
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE:
Special Structures Sectional Committee, CED 38
ADDRESSED TO :
1. Interested Members of Civil Engineering Division Council, CEDC
2. All Members of CED 38
3. All others interested
Dear Sirs,
Please find enclosed the following draft standard:
Doc No.
CED 38 (7892)
Title
Draft Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design of Reinforced Concrete
Chimneys (Third Revision of IS 4998(Part 1)
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
Doc. No.:_CED 38 (7892)__ BIS Letter Ref: _CED 38/T-6__ Dated: 22.04.2013
Title: Draft Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design of Reinforced Concrete Chimneys
Name of the Commentator/ Organization:
Sl
No.
Comments/ Suggestions/
Modified Wordings
Justification of
Proposed Change
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
FOREWORD
Formal clause will be included later
This standard (Third Revision) was first published in 1968 as IS: 4998 and subsequently revised
in 1975. The second revision was brought out in 1992 supposed to be in two parts, with the Part 1
(published in 1992) dealing with the assessment of loads and the Part 2 envisioned to deal with
design criteria for reinforced concrete circular (RC) Chimneys.
In the present revision, both the above aspects of assessment of loads and design criteria are
consolidated into a single standard. Only Chimneys of circular cross section have been included.
For the case of non-circular RC Chimneys, specialist advice shall be sought for estimating
dynamic wind loads.
The rapid growth of RC Chimney construction with a significant increase in capacity, size and
height has led to several queries being raised by designers and practicing engineers with regard to
procedures recommended in IS 4998 (Part 1):1992 for estimation of dynamic wind loads and
responses of chimneys. These include,
(i) use of simplified method for calculation of across-wind loads,
(ii) use of discrete strakes as aerodynamic remedial measures for suppressing or
alleviating vortex induced oscillations,
(iii) high values of magnification factors to be used for wind induced interference
effects, and
(iv) incorporation of limits state design. These aspects are addressed in this standard.
Presently, Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel (BLWT) tests continue to be the reliable design tool for
obtaining design inputs of tall chimneys. It is recommended to determine the
enhancement/shielding of structural response, if any, due to presence of important surrounding
structures which affect the aerodynamics of the flow considerably, BLWT tests on models of tall
chimneys be carried out for investigating interference effects.
Reference has been made to the following documents in preparing this revision.
1. ACI Committee 307-08, (2008), Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete Chimneys
(ACI 307-08) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, USA.
2. CICIND, (2001), Model Code for Concrete Chimneys Part A: The Shell (Second edition,
Revision 1), Zurich, Switzerland.
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
Cc
2. REFERENCES
Csf
Cs
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
f STC
f STV
'
f STV
f ck
f ck'
fy
f
(N/mm2)
= modified characteristic strength
'
y
g ac
H
I ref
Ka
= aerodynamic damping
parameter
K ao = mass damping parameter of
small amplitudes
Ki = coefficient of heat transmission from
gas to inner surface of chimney lining
when chimney is lined, or to inner
surface of chimney shell when
chimney is unlined (Watt/(m2
Kelvin)) see Fig. 3.
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
Sp
= spectral parameter
k1
Ss
t (z )
T
Tx
t
tO
tH
V*
5
H varying over a range of
6
0.5 V ( zref ) and 1.3 V ( zref )
Vb
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
Ymax
z
zref
z0
te
a
s
1
1'
2'
cu
= aerodynamic roughness
height (m)
= power law exponent
= thermal coefficient of
expansion of concrete and of
reinforcing steel (/oC)
= aerodynamic damping factor
su
'
a
ck
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
4.
MATERIALS
4.1 General
dH
Total
height of
chimney
(H)
Ground level
dO
LOADS
Dead Loads
5.2
Imposed Loads
Inside
diameter
Outside
diameter
5.4 Temperature Effects
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
z
k2 0.1423ln z0 0.0706
z0
where z0 is the aerodynamic roughness
height which shall be taken as 0.002 m for
terrain category 1, and 0.02 m for terrain
category 2 and other terrain categories.
5.5.4 Design wind pressure due to hourly
mean wind speed, p (z )
The design wind pressure due to hourly
mean wind speed, p (z ) , in N/m2,
corresponding to V (z ) shall be computed
as follows:
p( z )
V (z )
In this standard for the purpose of
computing along-wind loads at various
levels along the height of a chimney, the
hourly mean wind speed shall be taken as
the reference wind speed and at a given
height, z, the design wind speed, V (z ) in
m/s can be computed by multiplying Vb with
modification factors, k1, k 2 and k3, and is
given by:
V ( z ) Vb k1k 2 k3
F ( z ) F z F ' ( z )
1
2
a V ( z )
2
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
rt 0.622 0.178log10 H
F z CD d z p z
where
CD is the mean drag coefficient taken as 0.8
H 0.63
B 1
265
height z
The fluctuating component of along-wind,
F z in N/m, at height z shall be computed
as :
F z 3
0.88
(G 1) z
F ( z ) z dz
H2 H 0
f1 0.21
123
H
V (10)
2
f1 0.42
1
330
H
V
(10)
0.83
where
G is the gust response factor, (as per
Cl. 5.5.6)
H is the total height of the chimney above
ground level (in m).
0.88
1.14
f1
0.98
S 1 5.78
H
V (10)
SE
G 1 g f rt B
where
g f is the peak factor, defined as the ratio of
5.5.7
g f 2ln ( T )
0.577
2ln ( T )
where
3600 f1
B
1
SE
1/ 2
Across-wind loads
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
V2
M ac g ac S s CL a cr d H 2
2
0.5
2L
SP
H C
4 s a
E
d
0.5
V*
V* V ( zref )
1.0 0.95
V ( zref )
where
s 0.01
CL CLo F1B
where
CLo is the RMS lift coefficient modified for
local turbulence and is given by
1.0
I
ref
zref
ln
z0
S t 0.25F1A
where
Ss is the mode shape factor taken as 0.57 for
the 1st mode and 0.18 for the 2nd mode
CE is the end effect factor taken as 3
gac is the peak factor for across-wind load
taken as 4.0
where
f 1 and f 2 are the natural frequencies of
unlined chimney in the first and second
modes of vibration, respectively in Hz as per
Cl. 5.5.8.
H
F1 A 0.333 0.206 ln
d
where
f1d
for the first mode and
St
5 f 2 d for the second mode
Vcr
Ka ad 2
mave
where
mave is the average mass in top one third of
chimney per unit height (kg/m)
Ka = Kao F1B
where
K ao
1 5I ref
1.0
k 1
1
I ref 0.10
where
H
F1B 0.089 0.337 ln
d
V ( zref )
0.10 V* V ( zref )
V*
Vcr
Sp
k 1.5
Bw 0.25
1 k 1
1
exp
2 Bw
where
Bw is the bandwidth parameter, given by
Bw 0.10 2 I ref
10
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
Fac (z)
M ac m( z)i ( z)
H
m ( z)i ( z)z dz
0
where
m(z) is the mass per unit height of chimney
at level z (kg/m)
i(z) is the mode shape corresponding to ith
mode
Using Fac(z), the across-wind bending
moments at any height, Mac(z), can be
obtained.
5.5.8 Natural frequencies
For preliminary design, the natural
frequency of unlined chimney in the first
mode of vibration, f 1 (in Hz) may be
approximated using the following formula:
d Eck tO
f1 0.2 O2
H ck tH
0.3
where
tO is the thickness of the shell at bottom (m)
tH is the thickness of the shell at top (m)
dO is the centerline diameter of the shell at
bottom (m)
ck is the mass density of concrete
(kg/m3)
Eck is dynamic modulus of elasticity of
concrete (N/m2)
Grade of Concrete
M25
M30
M35
M40
Dynamic Modulus of
Elasticity (N/mm2)
3.20 1010
3.35 1010
3.50 1010
3.60 1010
d t
f 2 6 f1 H H
dO tO
0.2
where
dH is the centerline diameter of the shell at
top (m)
However, for final design, the natural
frequency shall be computed by dynamic
analysis.
If the lining is supported in any manner by
the shell, the effect of lining on the natural
frequency shall be investigated.
5.5.9
11
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
0.5
V*
where Fal ( z ) F ( z )
V ( z )
ref
where
Moe or Moi is the external and internal ring
moments, respectively, (N-m/ m)
p(z) is the design wind pressure due to 3
second gust wind speed at height z (N/m2),
and
rm(z) is the mean radius of the shell at the
section under consideration (m).
The design wind pressure (pz) due to 3
second gust wind speed at height z, for the
circumferential ring moments, shall be
obtained in accordance with IS 875 (Part 3),
treating the chimney as Class A structure.
(LIMIT
DESIGN
12
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
a) DL
TL
(5)
-
b) DL + WL + TL
0.9
1.2
1.6*
1.6*
1.2
1.2
c) DL + EL + TL
0.9
1.2
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.2
d) WL + TL
(for circumferential ring moments)
NOTE:
*
The factor 1.6 shall be used for the along-wind loads of Cl.5.5.5. For the across-wind loading combined
with the along-wind loading of Cl.5.5.7, a factor of 1.4 shall be used.
13
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
1.2 m '
f ck' f ck
f CTV
0.8
1.2 m '
f ck
f CTC
0.8
Replace fy with
f y'
f y 1.2 m f STC
'
where f CTC
and
Cl. 6.2.6.
te c Tx Ec
te c 1 2 Tx Es
where
1 , f STV and
defined in Cl. 6.2.6.
are
'
f STV
f STV
ring
te 2 c Tx Es
te c' Tx Ec
f STC
where
f ck'
Replace fy with
1.2 m
'
f STV 1 f STV
f y' f y
1
'
f CTV
,
14
te 2 'c' Tx Es
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
c n( 1 1)
n( 1 1)
2 n 2 1 (1 2 )
' n( 1 ' 1)
td
Ti To
Tx ci
td
d ci
1
Cc d c
ci
K i Cc d c K o d co
Draft for Comments only
td bi
Ti To
Tx
t b d bi t s d bi
td bi
d bi
Cc d c 1
K C d C d C d K d
b b
s s
c c
o co
i
td bi
Ti To
Tx
t
d
d
td
d bi
Cc d c 1
b bi bi bi
K i Cb d b K r d b C c d c K o d co
td bi
Ti To
Tx
Cc dc 1 tb dbi dbi td bi dbi
rq K i rqCb db K s d s Cc dc K o dco
where
db is the centerline diameter of uninsulated
lining or insulation around liner (m)
dbi is the inside diameter of uninsulated
lining or insulation around liner (m)
dc is the centerline diameter of concrete
chimney shell (m)
dci is the inside diameter of concrete
chimney shell (m)
dco is the outside diameter of concrete
chimney shell (m)
ds is the centerline diameter of space
between lining and shell (m)
Unless complete heat balance studies are
made for the particular chimney, it is
permissible to use the approximate values
given as follows. These constants, when
entered into equations for temperature
differential through the chimney shell, T x
will give values of accuracy in keeping with
the basic design assumptions:
rq is the ratio of heat transmission through
chimney shell to heat transmission
15
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
Ko
Kr
Ks
d 6000
150 ci
, where dci is the inside
120
16
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
6.4.3 Foundations
6.4.3.1 General
Shallow (raft) or deep (piled) foundations
may be provided for chimneys as required
from
geotechnical
considerations.
Foundations must be designed to transfer the
vertical (gravity) and lateral (wind/
earthquake) loads safely to the subgrade.
The foundations must also be sufficiently
rigid to prevent excessive deflection of the
chimney.
Tall chimneys are more susceptible to
differential settlement than ordinary
structures firstly because the width of the
foundation is small in relation to the height
of the structure, and secondly because of the
lack of redundancy in the structure.
Uplift shall not be permitted for a raft
foundation under the critical load
combination of (0.9DL + 1.0WL). For piled
foundations, the tension capacity of the piles
may be utilised to permit a small amount of
uplift.
6.4.3.2 Layout of foundations
Foundations for chimneys are usually
circular or annular in plan. Polygonal raft/
pile cap with 8 or more sides may also be
used. Foundations may be simple solid
slabs or cellular, consisting of top and
bottom slabs interconnected by vertical
diaphragms.
6.4.3.3 Stability
The foundation of the chimney must provide
adequate stability and safety. Foundation
stability may be assumed to be adequate if
the relevant clauses of IS 456 are satisfied.
6.4.3.4 Analysis
Foundations may be analyzed by using
typical elastic analysis procedures. Detailed
finite element analyses are desirable for
unusual geometries and cellular foundations.
17
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
As
0.048 f ck tl
fy
6.4.4 General
a)
18
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
8. CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS
8.1 Forms
i) Forms for the chimney shell shall be made
of metal, wood, or other suitable materials.
ii) Forms shall be sufficiently tight to
prevent leakage of mortar.
iii) Load shall not be placed on the concrete
19
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
20
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
21
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
Section 1-1
Fig. 3 EXTRA REINFORCEMENT AROUND OPENING
22
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
ANNEX A
REFERENCE
IS No.
456 : 2000
Title
Plain and reinforced concrete Code of practice (Fourth revision)
1893
(Part 4) : 2005
875
(Part 1) : 1987
(Part 2) : 1987
(Part 3) : ****
Dead loads
Imposed loads
Wind loads (Third revision of IS 875 Part 3:1987- Finalized)
11089 : 1984
15498 : 2004
23
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
Annex B
[Clauses 6.2.1 (d) and 6.2.2]
B-1
DESIGN
STRENGTH
CIRCULAR CHIMNEY SECTION
E s for sy sy
fs f y
( / ) for sy su
s
fy
where sy
s Es
s = 1.15
OF
Es = 200000 N/mm2
su = 0.07
fc
0.67 C sf f ck
2
c
cu
cu
for cu
Stress (fs)
Upto 0.8 fy / s
0.85 fy / s
0.9 fy / s
0.95 fy / s
0.975 fy / s
f y / s
f y / s
where
cu = 0.002
fck = characteristic cube strength of concrete
(N/mm2)
c = 1.5
Csf = short-term loading factor
= [0.95 0.1 (Pu/Pumax)]/0.85
Pu = Factored axial load
Table B.1
Strain ()
0.8 fy / (s Es)
[0.85 fy / (s Es)] + 0.0001
[0.9 fy / (s Es)] + 0.0003
[0.95 fy / (s Es)] + 0.0007
[0.975 fy / (s Es)] + 0.0010
[ fy / (s Es)] + 0.0020
Upto 0.05
/ need to be
0.67 f ck
2rt
c
p
p
1
f s ( cu )
100
100
24
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
0.002
0.002
xu
Neutral Axis
Tension
xu
2r x u
0.002
xu
0.07
(a) Neutral axis
within section
Neutral Axis
Pu f c 1
2 r t d
100
0
p
fs
2 r t d
100
0
M u f c 1
2 r t ( r cos ) d
100
0
p
fs
2 r t ( r cos ) d
100
0
25
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
Vertical Reinforcement
r
t
1 1
26
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
5.0
fy = 415 N/mm2
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
4.5
4.0
3.5
Pu / (fck r t )
3.0
r
t
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
27
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
4.5
fy = 415 N/mm2
3.5
3.0
Pu / (fck r t )
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
4.0
1 = 100
1
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
28
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
4.0
fy = 415 N/mm2
p/fck
3.5
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
3.0
Pu / (fck r t )
2.5
1 = 200
1
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
29
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
3.5
fy = 415 N/mm2
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
3.0
Pu / (fck r t )
2.5
1 = 300
1
1.2
1.4
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
30
1.0
1.6
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
4.0
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
3.5
3.0
2.5
Pu / (fck r t )
= 300; 2 = 100
fy = 415 N/mm2
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
31
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
3.5
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
3.0
2.5
Pu / (fck r t )
= 300; 2 = 200
fy = 415 N/mm2
1.2
1.4
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
32
1.0
1.6
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
4.0
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
3.5
3.0
2.5
Pu / (fck r t )
= 600; 2 = 100
fy = 415 N/mm2
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
33
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
4.0
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
3.5
3.0
2.5
Pu / (fck r t )
= 600; 2 = 200
fy = 415 N/mm2
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
34
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
3.0
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
2.5
2.0
Pu / (fck r t )
= 600; 2 = 300
fy = 415 N/mm2
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
35
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
4.0
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
3.5
3.0
2.5
Pu / (fck r t )
= 900; 2 = 100
fy = 415 N/mm2
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
36
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
4.0
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
3.5
3.0
2.5
Pu / (fck r t )
= 900; 2 = 200
fy = 415 N/mm2
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
37
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
3.5
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
3.0
2.5
Pu / (fck r t )
= 900; 2 = 300
fy = 415 N/mm2
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
38
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
4.5
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
4.0
3.5
3.0
Pu / (fck r t )
= 1200; 2 = 100
fy = 415 N/mm2
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
39
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
4.5
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
4.0
3.5
3.0
Pu / (fck r t )
= 1200; 2 = 200
fy = 415 N/mm2
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
40
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
4.0
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
3.5
3.0
2.5
Pu / (fck r t )
= 1200; 2 = 300
fy = 415 N/mm2
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
41
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
4.5
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
4.0
3.5
3.0
Pu / (fck r t )
= 1500; 2 = 100
fy = 415 N/mm2
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
42
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
4.5
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
4.0
3.5
3.0
Pu / (fck r t )
= 1500; 2 = 200
fy = 415 N/mm2
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
43
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
4.0
fy = 415 N/mm2
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
3.5
3.0
Pu / (fck r t )
2.5
1 1
r
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
44
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
3.5
fy = 415 N/mm2
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
3.0
2.5
1 1
r
Pu / (fck r t )
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
45
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
3.0
fy = 415 N/mm2
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
2.5
Pu / (fck r t )
2.0
1 1
r
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
46
1.0
1.2
1.4
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
3.5
fy = 415 N/mm2
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
3.0
2.5
1 1
r
Pu / (fck r t )
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
47
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
3.0
fy = 415 N/mm2
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
2.5
Pu / (fck r t )
2.0
1 1
r
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
48
1.0
1.2
1.4
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
2.5
fy = 415 N/mm2
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
2.0
1 1
r
Pu / (fck r t )
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
49
0.8
1.0
1.2
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
3.0
fy = 415 N/mm2
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
2.5
Pu / (fck r t )
2.0
1 1
r
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
50
1.0
1.2
1.4
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
2.5
fy = 415 N/mm2
p/fck
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
2.0
1 1
r
Pu / (fck r t )
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
M u / (f ck r 2 t )
51
0.8
1.0
1.2
CED 38 (7892)WC
April 2013
ANNEX C
INFORMATIVE ANNEX
Dynamic wind loads are dominant loads in the structural design of tall Reinforced Concrete (RC)
Chimneys of circular cross-section, which are one of the important power plant structures. From
the aerodynamics point of view, the circular cross-section, although simple in its form, poses
several challenges in the understanding of its flow behaviour, flow-structure interaction
characteristics and hence in the prediction of the wind-induced aero-elastic response of a
chimney. Significant advancements have been made during the past few decades all over the
world towards scientific and rational assessment of loads, analysis, design concepts and methods
of construction of chimneys. A chimney in an isolated condition is subjected to both (i)
atmospheric buffeting effect due to turbulent velocity fluctuations in the approach flow
contributing to along wind loads and (ii) vortex shedding and lateral component of the turbulence
in the approach flow contributing to across-wind loads. Since wind speed varies randomly both in
time and space, the analysis of wind loads is based on the principles of statistics and theory of
random vibrations. The mean along-wind load per unit height, at any given height, is estimated by
multiplying the design wind pressure due to hourly mean wind speed at that height with the mean
drag coefficient and outer diameter. The Gust Response Factor (GRF) method, originally
developed by Davenport, and modified later by Vickery for the computation of along-wind loads /
response of a chimney is widely recognized and being used in most of the international codes and
hence the same method is recommended in this standard.
The estimation of across-wind loads, due to vortex shedding is relatively a more complex issue.
The challenges which retard the better understanding of the behaviour of chimney are due to (i)
the effect of Reynolds number and the turbulence intensity on the aerodynamic parameters such
as mean and fluctuating drag and lift coefficients, Strouhal number, correlation length, wake
pressure characteristics, etc., (ii) proper extrapolation of boundary layer wind tunnel experimental
results to full-scale chimney conditions, (iii) limited information from full-scale measured data on
various aerodynamic parameters with considerable scatter, etc. Despite the above, concerted
research efforts are still being undertaken in India and elsewhere to develop improved predictive
models on the response of chimneys subjected to across-wind loads. Although a complete
understanding of the across-wind response of a chimney due to vortex shedding is presently not
available, the semi-empirical method developed by Vickery and his coworkers is regarded as
most satisfactory method and it is included in the international codes of ACI 307-08 and CICIND.
For this reason, the method that is in line with ACI 307-08 is recommended in the present
standard.
In the structural design provisions, the philosophy of limit states design is adopted in this
standard, in line with international practice.
****************
52