Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
8715
REVIEWS
Review of Mass-Transfer Correlations for Packed Columns*
G. Q. Wang,, X. G. Yuan,*,, and K. T. Yu,
State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, and
Chemical Engineering Research Center, Tianjin University, Tianjin, Peoples Republic of China
Mass-transfer correlations developed during the last several decades for packed column used
for industrial fractionation, adsorption, etc. are reviewed. Theoretical basis and applicability of
the reviewed correlations are discussed and compared concisely. Some dominant correlations
and their parameters, as well as some considerations for further improvement, are also
summarized and discussed.
Introduction
A packed column is a common, important piece of
mass and heat transfer equipment extensively used in
chemical process industries, typically in the domain of
distillation, absorption, desorption, extraction, etc. Even
though, for many cases, the tray column is less expensive and its performance prediction is more accurate,
packed columns are increasingly sharing a significant
part of the tower equipment market as they demonstrate advantages in their lower pressure drop, higher
efficiency, and controlling sensitivity versus the tray
column. Especially, the structured packing, having been
developed and having gained a booming use in the
process industries during last two or three decades, can
provide more advanced hydraulic behavior, e.g., higher
capacity (throughput) and efficiency, smaller scalingup effect, and much lower pressure drop, which is
precious for the cases of lower pressure operation,
typically like vacuum distillation in the refinery crude
units. Some heat-sensitive material treatment relies
also on this extra low-pressure drop operation.
The extensive utilization of packings, especially structured packing, calls for reliable and accurate models for
the prediction of the hydrodynamic and mass-transfer
behavior of packed columns for design and analysis
purposes. Since the 1930s, many academic organizations
and packing suppliers have carried out numerous
research studies for the random packing and, since the
1980s, for the structured packings.
A number of mass-transfer models, empirical or semitheoretical for packed columns, have been published in
the literature. These models are built on a variety of
experimental bases and theoretical hypothesis, and they
have different precisions, limitations, and ranges of
suitability for application.
In this paper, we tried to give a comprehensive
summary of the models we have found in the open
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 22 27404732. Fax: +86
22 27404496. E-mail: yuanxg@tju.edu.cn.
HETP )
ln
(HTUG + HTUL)
-1
(1)
HETP )
uLs
ln uGs
+
- 1 kGae
kLae
(2)
where uGs and uLs are the gas- and liquid-phase superficial velocity, kG and kL are the gas- and liquid-phase
mass-transfer coefficients, respectively, and ae is the
effective interfacial area provided by the packing to
mass transfer. The accuracy of the model given by eq 2
obviously depends on the accuracy of the correlations
used for predicting the basic parameters, i.e., the masstransfer coefficients for the gas phase and liquid phase,
8716
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 44, No. 23, 2005 8717
8718
Table 1. Correlations for the gas- and/or liquid-side mass-transfer coefficients for random packings
commentsa
author
correlations
( )( )
( )
DL FLuL
kL ) m
ae
L
DG FLuL
kG ) 0.2
dc apL
ScL0.5
ScG1/3
( )
ScL1/3
HTUG )
99.7C00.75uG0.25
uL
1RGCGap
uG
HTUL )
C0
L 0.3
32.4RLCL W
dpFGuG
HTUG )
kG ) c
kL )
apdp2
ScG-2/3
ScL0.5
Zp 0.15
ScL0.5
3.05
FGuG 0.7
ScG1/3
apG
( )( )
0.0051 Lg
(apdp)-0.4 FL
1/3
FLuL
aeL
2/3
ScL-0.5
DG + 0.12 FGuGdp
kG ) K G
dp (1 - )-1 (1 - )G
x (
(6)
x
x
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
-0.15
ScG1/3
uLgdpe
3
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
1/6
( )( )
( )( )
kL )
(11)
2/3
) ( )
6DL FLgdpe2
dpe
L
partial wetting:
-0.75
( )
DG
(5)
0.45
( )( )
kL ) KL
Mangers and Ponter 30
(dc/3.66)m(Zp/3.05)1/3
ScG0.5
(3600FLuLffFf)n
HTUL ) Cf
-0.36
G(1 - )
DL dpFLuL
kL ) 25.1
dp
L
(4)
2/3
kG ) 0.0137(FGuG)0.65ScG-2/3
kL is computed by eq 3
OC
x
0.8
kG ) 1.195uG
CW
(3)
FLuL
DL
kL ) 0.015 2
2
1/3 a
[L /(FL g)]
e L
Shulman et al.11
PT
1-n
FL2ghpe3
(16)
(17a)
(17b)
0.27
L2
Wagner et al.36
Piche et al.38,39
DL
dh
0.5
uL
ap
Zt-0.5
Cpk
4GDGuG
kL )
Zt-0.5
Cpk
4LDLuL
ht
a p DL
kGae
ap2DG
3/4
(18)
L1.4FL0.3ap2.4
kG )
kL a e
-0.183
FGuG
dh( - hL) apG
1/6
FL2ghpe3
ScG1/3
6DL
dpe
FL g
L
1.44
2/3
ap0.5DG
kG ) C G
kL ) CL
2.03DLScL0.5 FLuL
ae
L
( )
x x{
( )
x
( )( )()
x
x
[( ) ( ) ( ) (
[( ) ( ) ( ) (
DG FGuGdpe
kG ) K G
dpe
G
kL ) 0.86
kL )
ScG1/3
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
1/3
( - ht)
) ( x )]
) ( x )]
)f
FLuL apuL2
FL g
Zt
uG
,
, 2
,ScL,
,
a p L
g
Zt + dc uL
ap L
FG
FL
(24)
)f
FLuL apuL2
FL g
Zt
uG
,
, 2
,ScG,
,
apL
g
Z
+
d
uL
a p L
t
c
FG
FL
(25)
a PT stands for penetration theory, CW stands for correlation based on wetted-wall columns as in eq 74, and OC stands for other
correlations.
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 44, No. 23, 2005 8719
8720
Table 2. Correlations for the Gas- and/or Liquid-Side Mass-Transfer Coefficients for Structured Packings
commentsa
author
Bravo et al.41
kL ) 2
x ( )
DL 92g
s 8FLL
where uGe )
Nawrocki et al.44
correlations
ScG0.33
kL )
DL dequLFL
deq L
0.8
ScG1/3
ScL0.5
( )(
B1
Xu et al.50
ScG0.33
ShG,turbDG
dhG
kL )
(36)
(37a)
dhG
ReGrv
lG,pe
(ReGrvScGGL/8)[1 + (dhG/lG,pe)2/3]
1 + 12.7xGL/8(ScG2/3 - 1)
sin R 4FLq
lratio L
1/3
FL gb
4DGuG
2/3
3LuL
FLgeff sin R
4DLuL
3LuL
FLgeff sin R
)(
4Ft
l
s
2/3
1/3
x
x
3 1/6
L2
[ ( )(
4Ft
l s
(37b)
(38)
( )( )
0.4185DL
b
x
x(
(35)
DLuLe
0.9dhG
kG is computed by eq 33
kG )
B2
) (
kL )
uG
uL
,u )
( - hL) sin R Le hL sin RL
ShG,lamDG
dhG
kL ) 2
(33)
0.8
sin RL uLed
Zt
DL
x(
ShG,turb )
(34)
DG FGdh(uLe + uGe)
kG ) 0.054
dh
G
kG )
(32)
uG
uL
,u )
(1 - hL) sin R Le hL sin R
DL L4g
d 3 F
L
ScG0.33
0.9DLuLe
s
where uGe )
0.8
where uGe )
(31)
0.5
DG FGs(uLe + uGe)
kG ) 0.054
s
G
kL ) A
(28)
(30)
DG deqKV(FL/FG)0.5
deq (1 - f/f )p
G
c
Olujic et al.57,58 b
0.8
DL
u (1-C2)/2
C1l cos R L
kG )
1/3
Hanley et al.48
kL ) 2
(29)
kL ) 2
Rocha et al.55
(26)
DL 3VL
s 2wdyn
Henriques et al.45
OC
( )
uG
92g
,u )
sin R Le
8FLL
x
x
ScG0.33
(27)
CW
0.8
1/3
DG FGdequGe
kG ) 0.0338
deq
G
kL ) 2
PT
DG FGdeq(uLe + uGe)
kG ) 0.0338
deq
G
)]
1/3
ScL1/2
(39)
(40)
(41)
a PT stands for penetration theory, CW stands for correlation based on wetted-wall columns as in eq 74, and OC stands for other
correlations. b Adjustment is using RL developed by Spekuljak and Billet63 for calculations of and uLe instead of R.
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 44, No. 23, 2005 8721
Table 3. Sum-Up of Shortcut Methods for Mass Transfer of Packed Columns
authors
shortcut correlations
dNL
FLuL
Whitt68
HTUG ) 36/
Murch69
Ellis70
Harrison and
Kister72
Strigle73
France71
(42)
( )
(
RL
FL
(43)
FGuG
-1
FLuL
)]( )
Zp
3.05
0.5
HETP ) 100/ap
HETP ) 100/ap + 0.102
atmospheric distillation (0.4-4 atm):
HETP ) exp(m - 0.187 ln L + 0.213 ln L)
restrictions: L ) 4-36 mN/m, L ) 0.08-0.83 cP
pressure distillation (>4 atm):
HETP ) n - 0.213 ln ML
restrictions: ML) 22-72 g/mol
1.54g0.5(FL - Fg)0.5-0.06
Lockett74
HETP )
Carillo et al.75
sheet packing:
HETP )
gauze packing:
HETP )
1.54g0.5(FL - Fg)0.5-0.06
ap[1 + 0.78 exp(0.00058ap)(Fg/FL)0.25]2
PxFLFV0.42
(2712 + 82.0P)[1 + 1.505(Fg/FL)0.25]2
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47a)
(47b)
(48)
(49a)
(49b)
8722
Table 4. Correlations for the Effective Interfacial Area for Random Packings
authors
Shulman et. al.11
Onda et al.20,21
correlations
L s-0.262 log L
ae ) m(808FG0.5uG)nLp 0.84
q
0.073
FL (AL - 1)
where A, B, m, n, p, q, r, and s can be obtained from ref 94, p 205, Table 6.4
ae
[ ()
aw
ap
ap
adyn
ap
ae
ap
() ()
ae
ap
ap
EV
()
ae
ap
PA
( ) ( ) ()
( )
FLuL
Lap
) 1.045
CR
) 0.229 - 0.091 ln
) 0.498
FLuL2
Lap
0.133
0.49
ap2L
0.5
FL g
ae
ae
ap
) 0.0277
FLgdpe2
L
(apdp)0.42
(53)
(54)
0.392 0.5
L
(55)
Zt0.4
ae
ap
3.477
( ) ( )
)a
()
1 + cos
2
0.13
FLuL
apL
uL2ap
FLL
(apdp)1.585
ae
ap
neg
ae
ap
) 0.6119
( )
FLuL
apL
0.641-0.407(1+cos )/2
(c/L)0.18
(58)
(59)
(apZt)b
( ) (
FLuLdh
L
() ()
( ) ( )
)
(56)
(57a)
(57b)
0.38
) 1.5(apdh)-0.5
neu,pos
(52b)
0.45
(52a)
0.196
ae ) 39L0.7uL0.326
ae ) (2.944 104)L0.28uL0.313 ( < 1.54 10-6)
ae ) 0.165L-0.625uL0.313 ( > 1.54 10-6)
ap
(51)
(52c)
uL2ap
g
uLL 6FGuG
L apG
(50)
0.182
c
L
aw astat
ap
ap
FL g
FLuL
Ldpe
0.041
ap2L
( ) ( )
( )( )
ae ) K L
ae
ae
ap
) 0.583
ae
ap
Nakajima et al.85
c 0.75
ReL0.1FrL-0.05WeL0.2
ap
L
where ReL ) FLuL/(apL), FrL ) uL2ap/g, WeL ) n LuL/(Lap)
limitations: 0.04 < ReL < 500, 1.2 10-8 < WeL < 0.272;
5 10-9 < FrL < 1.8 10-2, 0.3 < c/L < 2
) 1 - exp -1.45
astat
Kolev91
( )
BL0.57rL
-0.2
) ( )
uL2FLdh
L
0.75
uL2
gdh
-0.45
(1 - 2.4 10-4|MaL|0.5)
(60a)
(60b)
neu,pos
uLL
L
0.4305
FGuG
apG
1.0-0.192L/LR
(61)
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 44, No. 23, 2005 8723
Table 5. Correlations for the Effective Interfacial Area for Structured Packings
authors
correlations
ae
ae
ap
ae
ap
ap
Rocha et al.55
Olujic et al.56
Gualito et al.101
Siminiceanu et al.80
Xu et al.50
Olujic58
0.4
( )
0.2
0.76mdpe uL L
ap
1 - 0.93 cos
ae ) A(FLuL)0.2
ae/ap ) 0.5 + 0.0058Fr
ae/ap ) 1 (Fr > 0.85)
ae
Brunazzi et al.99
1.1
ae
ap
) 0.465
( )
FLuL
L a p
FL
L g
[
()[
1 - (f/fc)p
(1 - f)-1
1.5
deq hL
4
(62)
0.6
(63)
(64a)
(64b)
0.3
(65)
)]
)]
dequL2FL
L
) (1 - f) 1 - exp -
)
0.15a 0.2
p
dequL2FL
L
1 - exp -
FLg(sin R)2
3LuL
(66a)
(66b)
0.5
(67)
( )
29.12uL0.4L0.2s0.159
FL
) FseFt ) Fse
0.3 0.6 g
ap
(1 - 0.93 cos )(sin R)
L
ae
ae
ap
ae
ap
ae
ap
1-
1 + A/uBL
eq 68
) 0.1245
(68)
(69)
() [
ae
ap
0.15
1.2
1 + 0.2 exp(15uL/uG)
]
( ) (
6FLuL(1 - )
Lap
(70)
0.4
(71)
) ( ) ( )
-0.2
uL2FLdh 0.614 uL2 -0.45 FGdhuG 0.647
0.00842 FLuLdh
(1 ( SR0.358)
ap (a d )0.5
L
L
gdh
G
p h
where ( stands for surface tension positive and negative systems, respectively.
ae
ae
ap
) (1 - )
() ( )
ae
ap
where n ) 1 -
eq 51
sin 45
sin RL
)(
) (
(73)
ap
RL
RL
ae,Onda
1+ ln
+ (0.49 - x760/P) 1.2 250
45
250
45
(72)
ShG ) CReGmScGn
(74)
8724
Table 6. Exponents or Expressions Used in Correlations for the Effective Interfacial Area
eq 50
FL
uL
L
L
FG
uG
G
c d
ap
dpe
R
Z
g
-0.15b
-1.74 to
-1.04 to 0.08c
-0.90 to 0.69b
-0.20 to 0.92d
0.13 (L < 12 cP)
0.31 (L > 12 cP)
R ) f(FL,uL)
) g(FL,uL)
2
eq 51a
eq 52a
0.3
0.174
0.49
0.95
0.4
0.307
0.392
0.5
0.392
-0.1
-0.041
-0.5
0.392
-0.95
-0.315
-0.49
-0.45
0.108
0.392
0.392
-0.392
0.75
0.65
0.182
0.826
0.216
(1 - )0.42
0.608
eq 56
-0.4
0.05
0.294
eq 61
eq 59
0.641 - 0.407we
0.641 - 0.407w
0.407w - 0.641
-0.05
0.4
0.2
-0.15
-0.25
0.89
-0.13
-0.56
(1 + cos )3.477
0.407w + 0.359
(1-)1.585
0.18
0.6-1.25
-0.05
0.4
0.2
-0.15
0.45
eq 60a
eq 65
eq 67
0.55
0.4
0.2
-0.75
0.3
0.3
-0.3
0.5
hL1.5
-1.0
0
0.5
0.7
1.0
-1.0
1.0
sin R
-0.65 to 0
-0.15
eq 68
FL
uL
L
L
FG
uG
G
c
ap
dpe
R
Z
g
eq 54
0.4
eq 58
FL
uL
L
L
FG
uG
G
c
ap
dpe
R
Z
g
eq 53
0.45
eq 61
0.4305
0.4305
-0.4305
) f(L)f
-
1-
-0.15
eq 71
0.5
eq 73a
eq 72
0.4
0.4
-0.4
0.414
0.128
0.2
-0.614
0.647
0.647
-0.647
0.6
(1 - )0.4
-1.011
1.511
0.3
0.4
-0.1
-0.95
0.75
0.65
sin-n RL g
0.45
0.05
c
The analysis is based on the power progression of corresponding correlations. bFrom Raschig. From Berl. The critical surface tension
c is related with contact angle by cos ) 1+m(c - L). e w ) (1 + cos )/2. f ) 0.1-0.8. g n ) f(Rp, P, RL).
tion theory. In general, the flow of two phases in wettedwall columns was within the laminar region, and eq 74
was based on the assumption of laminar flow. But in
fact, liquid flow instabilities due to waves, film detachment, and drop formation often violate this assumption.
Olujic56 was the first author who directly considered the
more common phenomenon, transitional flow, which
usually exists in packed columns. On the basis of the
assumption that the extent of mass-transfer enhancement, which is due to entrance effects imposed by
abrupt changes in flow direction at each transition
between packing elements, is equal to that observed
with heat transfer in laminar and turbulent regimes
under similar conditions; the author gave Sherwood
number expressions for both the laminar and turbulent
flow regimes. This modeling idea could be considered
as a more realistic and favorable approach.
Anyway, it is reasonable and necessary to take
transitional flow into consideration for modeling mass-
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 44, No. 23, 2005 8725
8726
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 44, No. 23, 2005 8727
) contact angle, deg
) stripping factor
) viscosity, kg/(ms)
RL ) reference liquid viscosity (pure water at 20.2 C),
kg/(ms)
) kinematic viscosity, m2/s
GL ) gas-liquid friction factor
F ) density, kg/m3
) surface tension, N/m
c ) critical surface tension, N/m
) fraction of the triangular flow channel occupied by
liquid defined by 2s/(b + 2s)
) packing-related parameter in eq 11, m
) packing-related parameter in eq 12, m
) enhancement factor for turbulent diffusion in eqs 22
and 23
) decay rate of the stretched exponential used in eqs
66a and 66b
) packing surface void fraction
Subscripts
CR ) chemical reaction
dyn ) dynamic
e ) effective
EV ) evaporation
G ) gas or vapor
lam ) laminar flow
L ) liquid phase
neu ) surface tension neutral systems
neg ) surface tension negative systems
pos ) surface tension positive systems
PA ) physical absorption
stat ) static
turb ) turbulent flow
Acknowledgment
Financial support from the National Natural Science
Foundation of China through grant 20136010 is acknowledged.
Literature Cited
(1) Whitman, W. G. A Preliminary Experimental Confirmation
of the Two Film Theory of Gas Adsorption. Chem. Metall. Eng.
1923, 29, 146.
(2) Sherwood, T. K.; Shipley, G. H.; Holloway, F. A. L. Flooding
Velocities in Packed Columns. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1938, 30, 765.
(3) Sherwood, T. K.; Holloway, F. A. L. Performance of Packed
TowerssExperimental Studies of Absorption and Desorption.
Trans. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. 1940, 36, 21.
(4) Sherwood, T. K.; Holloway, F. A. L. Performance of Packed
TowerssLiquid Film Data for Several Packings. Trans. Am. Inst.
Chem. Eng. 1940, 36, 39.
(5) Van Krevelen, D. W.; Hoftijzer, P. J. Studies of Gas
Absorption. 1. Liquid Film Resistance to Gas Absorption in
Scrubbers. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas. 1947, 66, 49.
(6) Van Krevelen, D. W.; Hoftijzer, P. J. Studies of Gas
Absorption. 2. Application of the Liquid Film Resistance Relationship to the Absorption of Carbon Dioxide by Solution of Diethanolamine. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas. 1947, 66, 67.
(7) Van Krevelen, D. W.; Hoftijzer, P. J. Kinetics of Simultaneous Absorption and Chemical Reaction. Chem. Eng. Prog. 1948,
44, 529.
(8) Morris, G. A.; Jackson, J. Absorption Towers; Butterworth:
London, 1953.
(9) Shulman, H. L.; de Gouff, J. J. Mass Transfer Coefficients
and Interfacial Areas for 1-Inch Raschig Rings. Ind. Eng. Chem.
1952, 44, 1915.
(10) Shulman, H. L.; Ullrich, C. F.; Wells, N. Performance of
Packed Columns. 1. Total, Static and Operating Holdups. AIChE
J. 1955, 1, 247.
(11) Shulman, H. L.; Ullrich, C. F.; Proulx, A. Z.; Zimmerman,
J. O. Performance of Packed Columns. 2. Wetted and Effective
8728
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 44, No. 23, 2005 8729
(89) Maalej, S.; Benadda, B.; Otterbein, M. Mass Transfer
Phenomena in High-Pressure Agitated Bubble Reactor. Presented
at 4th International Symposium on High-Pressure Process Technology and Chemical Engineering, Venice, Italy, September 2225, 2002.
(90) Puranik, S. S.; Vogelpohl, A. Effective Interfacial Area in
Irrigated Packed Columns. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1974, 29, 501.
(91) Kolev, N. Operational Parameters of Randomly Packed
Columns. Chem. Ing. Tech. 1976, 48, 1105.
(92) Linek, V.; Petricek, P.; Benes, P.; Braun, R. Effective
Interfacial Area and Liquid Side Mass Transfer Coefficients in
Absorption Columns Packed With Hydrophilised and Untreated
Plastic Packings. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1984, 62, 13.
(93) Costa Novella, E.; Ovejero Escudro, G.; Uguina Zamorano,
M. A.; Lopez Gomez, C. Mass Transfer in Liquids. Determination
of Effective, Specific Interfacial Areas for Packing. Int. Chem. Eng.
1992, 32, 292.
(94) Treybal, R. E. Mass transfer operations; McGraw-Hill:
New York, 1980.
(95) Billet, R.; Shultes, M. Prediction of Mass Transfer Columns
with Dumped and Arranged Packings-Updated Summary of the
Calculation Method of Billet and Shultes. Chem. Eng. Res. Des.
1999, 77, 498.
(96) Spiegel, L.; Meier, W. Correlations of the Performance
Characteristics of the Various Mellapak Types (Capacity, Pressure
Drop and Efficiency). Inst. Chem. Eng. Symp. Ser. 1987, 62, A203.
(97) Fair, J. R.; Bravo, J. L. Distillation Columns Containing
Structured Packings. Chem. Eng. Prog. 1990, 86, 19.
(98) Henriques de Brito, M.; von Stockar, U.; Bangerer, A. M.;
Bomio, P.; Laso, M. Effective Mass Transfer Interfacial Area in a
Pilot Column Equipped with Structured Packings and with
Ceramic Rings. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1994, 33, 647.
(99) Brunazzi, E.; Nardini, G.; Paglianti, A.; Potarca, L. Interfacial area of Mellapark Packing: Absorption of 1,1,1-Trichloroethane by Genesorb 300. Chem. Eng. Technol. 1995, 18, 248.
(100) Aroonwilas, A.; Tontiwachwuthikul, P. Mechanistic Model
for Prediction of Structured Packing Mass Transfer Performance
in CO2 Absorption with Chemical Reactions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2000,
55, 2401.
(101) Gualito, J. J.; Cerino, F. J.; Cardenas, J. C.; Rocha, J. A.
Design Method for Distillation Columns Filled with Metallic,
Ceramic, or Plastic Structured Packings. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
1997, 36, 1747.
(102) Murrieta, C. R.; Seibert, A. F.; Fair, J. R.; Rocha-U, J. A.
Liquid-side Mass Transfer Resistance of Structured Packings. Ind.
Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 7113.
(103) Valluri, P.; Matar, O. K.; Mendes, M. A.; Hewitt, G. F.
Modeling Hydrodynamics and Mass Transfer in Structured
PackingssA Review. Multiphase Sci. Technol. 2002, 14, 303.
(104) Negny, S.; Meyer, M.; Prevost, M. Simulation of Velocity
Fields in a Falling Film with a Free Interface Flowing over a Wavy
Surface. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1998, 22, S921.
(105) Negny, S.; Meyer, M.; Prevost, M. Enhancement of
Absorption Efficiency for a Laminar Film Flow by Hydrodynamic
Conditions Generated by a New Type of Column Wall. Chem. Eng.
J. 2001, 83, 7.
(106) Negny, S.; Meyer, M.; Prevost, M. Study of a Laminar
Falling Film Flowing over a Wavy Wall Column. Part 1. Numerical
Investigation of the Flow Pattern and the Coupled Heat and Mass
Transfer. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 2001, 44, 2137.
(107) Negny, S.; Meyer, M.; Prevost, M. Study of a Laminar
Falling Film Flowing over a Wavy Wall Column. Part 2. Experimental Validation of Hydrodynamic Model. Int. J. Heat Mass
Transfer 2001, 44, 2147.
(108) Sherwood, T. K.; Pigford, R. L.; Wilke, C. R. Mass transfer;
McGraw-Hill: New York, 1975.
(109) Gandhidasan, P. Estimation of the Effective Interfacial
Area in Packed-Bed Liquid Desiccant Contactors. Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res. 2003, 42, 3420.
(110) Hoek, P. J.; Wesselingh, J. A.; Zuiderweg, F. J. Small
Scale and Large Scale Liquid Maldistribution in Packed Columns.
Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1986, 64, 431.
(111) Zuiderweg, F. J.; Kunesh, J. G.; King. D. W. Model for
the Calculation of the Effect of Maldistribution on the Efficiency
of a Packed Column. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1993, 71, 38.
(112) Zuiderweg, F. J.; Nutter, D. E. Evidence of Vapor Backmixing in Packed Columns in the Case of High-Pressure Distillation. Inst. Chem. Eng. Symp. Ser. 1992, 128, A481.
(113) Zuiderweg, F. J.; Olujic, Z.; Kunesh, J. G. Liquid Backmixing in Structured Packing in High-Pressure Distillation. Inst.
Chem. Eng. Symp. Ser. 1997, 142, 865.
(114) Yoshida, F.; Koyanagi, T. Mass Transfer and Effective
Interfacial Area in Packed Columns. AIChE J. 1962, 8, 309.
(115) Versteeg, H. K.; Malalasekera, W. An introduction to
computational fluid dynamics: The finite volume method; Longman: Harlow, U.K., 1995.
(116) Sun, Z. M.; Liu, B. T.; Yuan, X. G.; Liu, C. J.; Yu, K. T.
New Turbulent Model for Computational Mass Transfer and Its
Application to a Commercial-Scale Distillation Column. Ind. Eng.
Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 4427.
(117) Yin, F. H.; Sun, C. G.; Afacan, A.; Nandakumar, K.;
Chuang, K. T. CFD Modeling of Mass Transfer Processes in
Randomly Packed Distillation Columns. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
2000, 39, 1369.
(118) Yin, F. H.; Afacan, A.; Nandakumar, K.; Chuang, K. T.
CFD Simulation and Experimental Study of Liquid Dispersion in
Randomly Packed Metal Pall Rings. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2002,
80, 135.
(119) van Baten, J. M.; Krishna, R. Liquid-Phase Mass Transfer
within KATAPAK-S Structures Studied using Computational
Fluid Dynamics Simulations. Catal. Today 2001, 69, 371.
(120) van Baten, J. M.; Krishna, R. Gas and Liquid-Phase Mass
Transfer within KATAPAK-S Structures Studied Using CFD
Simulations. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57, 1531.
(121) Gu, F.; Liu, C. J.; Yuan, X. G.; Yu, K. T. CFD Simulation
of Liquid Film Flow on Inclined Plates. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2004,
27, 1099.