Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
[Year]
AHLUSSUNNAH WAL
JAMAAH
AHLUSSUNNAH
1
2
[REFUTATION OF NUR
ARGUMENT OF
BARAILVISM]
[Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary
of the contents of the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The
abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.]
3
Page
5A NUMBER OF BARAILVIS ARGUE THAT HOLY PROPHET WAS A NU:R . SOME CROSS
6LIMITS BY CLAIMING THAT HE WAS NOT A HUMAN BEING [INSAN\BASHAR] BUT
7BELONG TO A SPECIAL SPECIES CALLED NUR WHICH APPEARED AS A HUMAN BEING
8YET NEVER BECOME A HUMAN BEING. SOME BELIEVE THAT HE WAS A HUMAN BEING
9BUT OF VERY SPECIAL TYPE WHICH WAS MADE FROM NUR.
10THE WORD NUR MEANS LIGHT YET THIS IS JUST AN ANTERNATIVE WORD. IN THIS
11ARTICLE THEIR ARGUMENT FROM AL MAIDAH 14 IS DISCUSSED IN DETAIL.
12BARAILVI ARGUMENT FROM AL MAIDAH 14:13THE VERSE SAYS:-=
14QAD JAA ACUM MINALLAHI NU:RUN VA KITA:BUM MUBI:N. 15 AL MAIDAH.
15VARILY CAME INTO YOU FROM DEITY [ALLAH] NUR AND CLEAR BOOK. Barailvis argue
16that Va/VAU means and implies a distinction unless there is a Qarinah [Indicator ]. So
17Nur is not Kitab. If and Kitab is Quran. So Nur is Not Quran. If not Quran then the
18Holy Prophet . So he is the Nur. Some further add if nur then not a human being.
19ANSWER: BISMILLAHIRRAHMAANIRRAHIM. BISMILLAHIO VAL HAMDULILLAH
20ASSALATU VASSALAMU ALA RASULLILLAH
21First PREMILINAY
22HOLY PROPHET WAS A HUMAN BEING [BASHAR/INSAN] .THIS IS A ISLAMIC AXIOM.
23IF NUR CONTRADICTETH HIS HUMANITY [BASHARIAH/INSANIAH] THEN HE IS NOT
24NUR [GHAIR NUR], IF NOT THEN HE MAY BE A NUR BUT NOT AS A BELIEF BUT AS A
25PROBABLITY.
26NOTE:IF NOT NU:R THEN AFDAL MIN CUL LI AN NU:R AL HADIS
27DISCUSSION:
28IF by the Word NU:R AL CALA:M AN NAFISY is meant and by the Word KITA:B AL
29CALA:M AL LAFZ:IY is meant then the Letter [Word] VAU remains as a word of
30distinction since:311] ACCORDING to majority of SUNNIS who believe in AL CALA:M AN NAFSI:Y , AL
32CALA:M AN NAFSIY IS ETERNAL [QADI:M] and AL CALA:M AL LAFZ:IY IS H:ADI.
33There is no one among those Sunnis who believe in AL CALA:M ANNAFI:Y, that
34<<<<AL CALA:M AN NAFI:Y is NOT ETERNAL.>>>> .
35Majority of Majority Of Sunnis [ASHAIRAH AND MA:TURIDIAH] do believe that AL
36CALA:M AL LAFZ:I:Y is Not Eternal
42
5
Page
56
57Proof of the claim:AL CALA:M AL LAFZIY is Active if it is Eternal.
58PROOF:- According to ASHARITES Of the Majority of Sunnis ACTIVE AFFIRMATIVE
59ATTRIBUTES are HADIS. [1]
60There are only SEVEN[or eight]AFFIRMATIVE ESSENTIAL ATTIBUTES.THEY ARE AS
61FOLLOW:621]HAYA:H [LIFE OF DEITY]
632]ILM [KNOWLEDGE/OMNISCIENCE OF DEITY]
643] QUDRAH [POWER/OMNIPOTENCE]
654]IRA:DAH or MASHYAH [INTENTION/WILL/VOLUTION OF DEITY]
665]BASR [ATTRIBUTE OF CAPABILITY OFSEEING/WATCHING OF DEITY]
676]SAM [ATTRIBUTE OF CAPABILITY OFHEARING/LISTENING OF DEITY ]
687]AL CALA:M AN NAFIY[SPEECH/DICTUM/DICTIONIS OF DEITY].
69Any other affirmative Attribute of Deity is Active and Not Essential.
73
8
9
10
70
71So if AL CALA:M AL LAFZ:IY is and Affirmative Attribute Of Deity then it must
72ACTIVE and Not Essential.
73If ACTIVE then Temporal.So an ASHARITE can not claim that AL CLA:M AL LAFZ:IY is
Page | 4
74an ESSSENTIAL ATTRIBUTE since:751] ONLY THE ESSENTIAL AFFERMATIVE ATTRIBUTES OF DEITY ARE ETERNAL [1]as
76according to them.
772]THERE ARE ONLY SEVEN AFFIRMATIVE ATTRIBUTES WHICH ARE SSENTIAL[2] as
78according to them.
79So if some one claims that AL CALA:M AL LAFZ:IY is Eternal then He cannot be an
80ASHARITE unless and other vise he has been influenced either by SALAPHITES
81[SALAFIS ONE OF THETHE MINORITIES OF AHLUSSUNNAH] OR MATURIDITES
82[MATURIDIAH ,A SUB DIVISION OF MAJORITY OF AHLUSSUNNAH] or both.[3]
83So such a person is either BELONGS TO H:ANABALAH OR BELONGS TO MATURIDIAH.
84Since SALAFIS do not believe in the Eternity Of CALA:M AL LAFZ:IY. So they are
85differ on this ISSUE from H:ANA:BALAH.
86IF such a person is Maturidi then he can not believe that AL CALA:M AL LAFZI:Y is
87ESSENTIAL AFFIRMATIVE ATTRIBUTE OF DEITY. Since Maturidiah are relatively more
88inclined to reason then ASHARIES and believe in only eight ESSENTIAL DIVINE
89ATTRIBUTES OF DEITY. SEVEN OF THEM ARE THE SAME AS STATED ABOVE. THEY
90ADD AN OTHER ATTRIBUTE TACVI:N. FOR CERTAIN REASONE THEY ARE GIVEN
91BELOW.
92
931]HAYA:H [LIFE OF DEITY]
942]ILM [KNOWLEDGE/OMNISCIENCE OF DEITY]
953] QUDRAH [POWER/OMNIPOTENCE]
964]IRA:DAH or MASHYAH [INTENTION/WILL/VOLUTION OF DEITY]
975]BASR [ATTRIBUTE OF CAPABILITY OFSEEING/WATCHING OF DEITY]
986]SAM [ATTRIBUTE OF CAPABILITY OFHEARING/LISTENING OF DEITY ]
997]AL CALA:M AN NAFIY[SPEECH/DICTUM/DICTIONIS OF DEITY].
1008] TAKVIN [EXISTANTIALITY,CREATIVITY,CAPABILITY TO BRING IN EXISTENCE]
101Any other affirmative Attribute of Deity is Active and Not Essential.
11
12
Page
102AS CALA:M AL LAFZ:IY does not belong to the above CLASS of ATTRIBUTES, it is an
103ACTIVE ATRIBUTE.
104IF one how EVER claims THAT the ETERNITY OF CALA:M AL LAFZI:Y ,AND CLAIM
105THAT HE is MATURIDIY, he cannot believe that IT IS ESSENTIAL.[4]
106THIS COMPLETES THE PROOF.
Q.E.D
135
14
15
16
135meaning/sense).But a minority of them are called ATHARIAH which are divided into
136several groups. Most well known of them are SALAPHITES [Salfiah]and H:ana:balah.
137Salaphites deney ALCALA:M AN NAFSIY. But even according to them the Divine
138CALA:M is divided into two types. A] One That Is Associated With Divine Essence Of
Page | 6
139Deity.[5]. B] One That Is Not Associated With the Divine Essence stated above.
140There is no dispute among the Stated above Majority over the division or over the types
141stated above. However the dispute is upon the identification of the first type ID EST
142One That is Associated With The Divine Essence. According to Majority Of Sunnis It Is
143NAFSIY while according to the this fraction of Minority It Is Lafz:iy.
144So One can safely claim on this standard that THE WORD NU:R meanet THE TYPE A
145OF CALA:M stated above and the words KITA:BUM[m]MUBI:N is used for the type B
146stated Above. The H:ana:balah also agree with Salaphites on the issue ,except that
147they differ over the Nature of type A Of Divine Cala:m stated above. But this does not
148disturb the stated above commentary of the verse id est << The word NU:R In the
149Verse is used for The type A stated above, and the words KITA:BUM[m]MUBI:N In
150the Verse is used for the type B stated Above>>.[5]
151NOTES:1521]Some Elders of AHARITES how ever believed in Eight ESSENTIAL AFFIRMATIVE
153ATTRIBUTES adding Q-dm TO THE LIST. Few added Existence /Esse TO THE LIST.
154Some added the attributes which are appearently parts like V-JH,YAD,EYE etc.as
155well.
156But none of them added Active Attribute to the list.They are how ever few in
157number.
158[2]May also be called AFFIRMATIVE POSATIVE ATTRIBUTES Of Deity.
159[3]How ever this requires a proof and an evidence. That is the REQUIRMENT OF an
160EXPLICIT quotation which beyond any shadow of doubt MUST SAY that<< The
161PERSON X in ASHARITES believeth that AL CALAM AL LAFZ:I is Eternal or Essential
162or Both.
163[4]Although Majority Maturidiah believe in the Eternity of Active Attributes in a way
164which is different the Eternity of Essential Attributes , IT is very unlikely that that
165they believe that AL CALA:M AL LAFZ:IY is eternal. AL CALA:M AL LAFZ:IYIs Not
166Eternal even according to them. Since it is believed by all Muturidiah
167As aAudible[MASMU].If it was believed to be Eternal they would have considered it
168as
17
18
Page
Preliminary
200There are certain objections on this answer. How ever it must be noted once for all
201that even the weakest Probability of this maketh the argument to cease ,the
202necessary condition of an argument to be valid , is that it MUST be Cetrain.So it is
203immaterial whether the probability is Weak or strong. Even the weakest probability
204is Sufficient to Annhiliate the validity Of the Argument.
197
20
21
22
205A NUMBER OF OBJECTIONS are made to disprove the probability and to disprove this
206explanation of the commentary.
207But if they are supposed to be valid even then this does not prove that the word
208Nu:r it used for the Essence Of the Prophet PeaceBe Upon Him.But if it is supposed
209thatPage
the Word
| 8 Nu:r is used for the ESSENCE OF THE PROPHET, then it is necessary
210that each and every objection is true ALONG WITH OTHER NECESSARIES.
211In this preliminary one must discuss the objections which may be raised against this
212Explanation Of the Commentary Of The Verse.
213FIRST OBJECTION.
214I f the word Nu:r is used for AL CALA:M AL LAFZ:IY then the Word/Letter Vau
215cannot be used in the meaning of CALA:M ALAFZ:IY. Since in this case the real
216meaning of Vau is a<< distinctive and /And Of Distinction>> that implies that
217Cala:m Al lafz:iy Is distinct from itself ,Since the Words Kita:b un [m]Mubi:n is used
218for CALA:M AL LAFIY.
219If the word Nu:r is used for CALA:M AN NAFSIY, then this implies an impossibility.
220<<<< AL CALA:M AN NAFSIY is Eternal According to All the believers Of AL
221CALA:M AN NAFSIY.And An Eternal Can Not Come In Creations. As the Universe,
222Space-Time Manifold ,Human Beings all are creations and creatures It is Impossible
223and Rationally Absurd for The Eternal AL CALA:M AN NAFSIY to COME in one of
224the Creations , in some of the creations or in All the creations. Further it cannot
225assume any Non-Eternal Nature. The Divine Expression ANA:M : says that Nu:r and
226Kita:bun[m]Mubi:n Came among you [people]>>>>.
227ANSWER: This is an incorrect objection, even incorrect according to MAJORITY OF
228BARAILVIS.The reasons are given below:2291] According to majority of Barailviah Both AL CALA:M AL LAFZ:IY and AL CALA:M
230AN NAFSIY Are Eternal. Only a minority of Barailiah believes that AL CALA:M AL
231LAFZ:IY is Not Eternal. So this objection is also upon them. It is illogical ,irrational
232AND, unreasonable to claim that CALA:M AL NAFSIY cannot come since it is eternal,
233yet Cala:m Al Lafz:y can come even it is eternal. Such a claim is incorrect.
234Thus this objection can be made only by the minority of Barailviah, and not from
235Majority of Barailviah. But they can only make it if they make an objection upon the
236Majority Of Their Sect. Since their Majority believes that the words KITA:BUN[M]
237MUBI:N is used for CALA:M AL LAFZ:IY.
238The official representative of Barailiah is the majority of Barailviah and not the
239minority of Barailviah. One who maketh such an objection cannot belong to the
23
24
240majority of Barailviah since if a person can believe that One Eternal[say AL CALA:M
Page
241AL LAFZ:IY] Can Come in Created [Human] Beings, then he can not believe in the
242impossibility of an other Eternal[say AL CALA:M AN NAFSIY].
2432] According to The founder of the sect Maul-vi Rad:a: /Raz;a:[1856-1920/21] Of
244Bans Baraili, United Provinces ,British india [1858A.C-1947A.C], AL CALA:M AL
245LAFZ:I and AL CALA:M AN NAFSIY are one and the same; he declairs all those who
246believes them as two Attributes ,as in Error in a single stroke.
247So if in any case he is compelled to take an Eternal ATTRIBUTE.
248
249AL CALA:M AN NAFSIY both are ONE and SAME , AND IS ETERNAL .He
250did not claimed that there is a
251WELL AS NAFSIY .
252LAFZ:IY
Non Eternal
HE DID NOT CLAIM THAT THERE IS ONLY ONE CALA: M THAT IS NEITHER
NOR NAFCIY .
253Thus according to the stated above founder there is only ONE Divine
254CALA:M which is LAFZ:IY as well as NAFSIYThis Only Divine Calaam Is
255Eternal.So according to his specific belief there is No Non Eternal
256Divine Calaam. So this objection is upon the very founder himself, since
257almost and atleast the founder chose the only Cala:m either for The
258words Kita:bun [m] Mubi:nor for the wor Nu:r.
259SINCE IF THERE IS ONLY ONE CALA:M WHICH IS LAFZ:IY AND NAFCIY THEN IT IS
260CERTAINLY ETERNAL.
261If he taketh it for Nu:r then he cannot say:-1] that the word Nu:r is used
262for the Essence Of Holy Prophet [S:AL LAL LA: HU ALAI VA
263SALLAMA].2] He becometh one of the denouncer of the claim that
264Eternal Cannot come in [Creations] [say Human Beings.]
265 If he CHOSETH it for the words KITA:B UN[ m]MUBI:N, then at least he
266becometh one of the denouncer of the claim that Eternal Cannot come
267in [Creations] [say Human Beings.].Even this is sufficient to shew that
268this objection is based on an Claim which is not accepted even by the
269founder of the sect.
270[[So if the Words NU:R and KITABUN[M]MUBI:N in the verse mean Quran
271the the word /letter VAU means A DISCTINCTIVE ANDeven then it Possible
259
26
10
27
28
272that the word Nu:r doeth mean AL CALA:M AN NAFSIY and the words
273KITABUN[M]MUBI:N do mean AL CALA:M AL LAFZ:IY.
274The only objection on it is that If the word Nu:r meaneth AL CALA:M AL
275LAFZ:IY then THEN IT can not come in Human beings since an Eternal
276Cannot
IN CREATIONS, It is Rationally Immpossible.
Page | Come
10
277This objection is invalid and unsound since A large nuber of Barilvis
278believe that AL CALA:M AL LAFZ:IY is also Eternal AND DUE TO VERY
279SAME REASON , they cannot take the words
280KITABUN[M]MUBI:N in the meaning of AL CALA:M AL LAFZ:IY.
281Even their founder cannot take these sated above words for the only
282Divine CALA:M which is both]]
283AL CALA:M AL LAFZ:IY and AL CALA:M AL LAFZ:IY.
284Now a minute minority of Barailvis can make such an objection, ie those
285who believe that AL CALA:M AL LAFZ:ITY is NOT ETERNAL.
286But they can be responded . They shall be responded latter.
287Second
Objection.
30
Page
11
305how ever that Affirmative Essential Attributes Of the Essence Of Deity are
306Identical in Misda:q and areNot Identical in Mafhum which the consider as
307abstraction [Intiza:].Some other expressions for their ideas are as
308Affirmative Essential Attributes Are Identical but the Mafhu:m [Concept]Of
309each Essential Attribute is SEPERATE. A number of other possible
310expressions are as follow
3111] The Manashi [ORIGINATORS] Of Essential Sifa:t Are AIN Of DHA:T and
312The Mafahim are Ghair Of DHA:T.
3132]Manashi Of Mafahim are the S:iFAT which are Identical to the Divine
314Essence and the Mafahim of S:IFAT are Separate [Non Idsentical].
315The founder Of Khaira badi sect and an extreme critic of traditional
316Asharism and Maturidism who neither believed in Jal AlBasi:t nor in Jazz
317La tajazza , and a believer in the Identity Of Essential Attributes, accepted
318that If Mutacallamin means by the term La AIN Va La Ghair la AIN Bil
319Mafhum and La Ghair Bil Misda:q THEN they are right. See Imtina: An Nazir
320[ Persian work].
321So the word AL AIN does not means AIN in Misdaq and Ain In Mafhum,
322[ABSOLUTE IDENTITY], but Ain Only In Misdaq.
[Non Absolute Identity].
323The believers of Identity do not believe in La Ain Vala Ghair, they disoute
324from the traditional ASHRAISM AND MATURISM on the following issues.
325They do not consider the Mafahim as sifat but the Mansha of each Mafhum
326AS Sifah.
327They consider that the Mansha Of each Mafhum is Identical To the Divine
328Essence.But The believer Of La Ain Vala Ghair do not believe that the
329Divine Essence is the MANSHA of Sifat. Also the do not believe that Sifat is
330the Mansha of Mafhum of themselves.
331 The dispute between Mutazila and these Identitist Sunnis is that the
332former do not believe in such a way. Some of them deney openly that No
333Sif-h is Affirmative . They are all negative. That is Divine Omniscience
334means Divine Non Ignorence, Divine Power means Divine Non Weakness
335etc.This is negation of Sifa:t [Attributes].Some of them term Essential
336Attributes as Relatives. Example. They say that the Divine Essence is
337Powerful and Power with reference to the Object Of Powers [Maqdur], the
338Divine Essence Is Knowledge and Knower with reference to Object Of
339Knowledge [Malum]. And so on.
340But these Identitist[Of Indian Sunnis] do not believe in this RELATIVE
341IDENTITY OR IDENTITY OF REFERENCE(S). The Mafahim are not relative the
3111
32
33
34
12
342are abstracted directly from their Manashi which are Absolutely identical
343TO THE Divine Essence, and does not require a terminal object as is seen
344in references and relations.
345Any how what so ever be the explanation it is actually out of the original
346scope
this article.
Pageof
| 12
347The actual answer is that they are Not Identical in Mafhu:m/ Mafa:hi:m.
348So if Cala:m Al Lafz:i and Cala:m An Nafsi are both supposed to be
349Essential Attributes then they are not Identical In MafahIm. The word Vau
350is Distinctive in regard to Mafhum. This is sufficient for Vau to be
351Grammatical distinctive.There is no condition of distinction in regaer to
352Masadiq as according to these Identitist. Sot they allow the sayings as
353AlIlm Val Qudrah Val IradaH Val Cala:m etc. How ever these Identitists
354only believe in the stated above Identity of Affirmative Essential
355Attributes , and not of Affirmative Active Attributes. Even the Identitist
356who claim them selves as Maturidiah did not say that ACTIVE ATTRIBUTES
357OR IDENTICAL TO DIVINE ESSENCE.
358So this argument that the word Vau cannot be used between Nu:r and
359Kitabun [m] Mubin IF THE former means AL CALA:M AN NAFSI, AND THE
360Latter means AL CALA:M AL LAFZIY, BECOMES INVALID.
361So it is accurate and valid to use the word Vau between any two Essential
362Attributes Of Deity even if they are consider to be Identical To Divine
35
36
Page
13
with
14
39
40
412NOW IF THEY HAVE USED THE WORD QURAN THEN THERE ARE THE
413FOLLOWING LOGICAL POSIBILITIES.
414A] THEY HAVE USED THE WORD FOR ALCALAAM AL LAFZI.
415B] THEY HAVE USED THE WORD FOR AL CALAAM AN NAFCIY.
Page | 14
SUNNIS WHO TAKE THE WORD KITAB IN THE VERSE FOR QURAN
444AND THE WORD NUR FOR QURAN CAN NOT TAKE CALAAM AN NAFCIY
41
42
15
445AT
447SO
OBJECTION.
IS NOT NUR BUT THE PROPHET IS THE NUR.
455ANSWER.
16
45
46
480Those
Page | 16
484
485
486
487
FORTH PRIMILINARY
495
496
497BIN
47
48
Page
17
509This means any thing with these two attributes/qualities 1] Zahu:r 2] Izha:r is called
510Nur whether it is a Matter or it is Material or any other type of Substance .If the
511Essence of any human Being is associated with these two Attributes the Human
512Essence can be termed as Light.
513The Addition of these two Attributes Can Not Exclude any Human Essence from the
514domain of Human Beings [Insa:n/ Bashar]. Thus if the word Nu:r means any Thing
515whether Essence or Attribute which is Muz:hir Li Ghairihi Va Z:a:hir Bi Nafsihi then
516the Essence Of any human being does not cease to be the Essence of the human being if
517DEITY Bestowes these two attributes stated above to a human Essence.
518Similarly the SIMILARITY/LIKENESS of a human Essence doesnot Cease to be from an other
519Human Essence just because of these to Additional Attributes.
520If it is insisted that some of the similarity is lost and if this is accepted just for an argument
521then if is the case that the Principle Similarity is preserved and conserved. It is not lost. But
522Holy Prophet doeth not cease to be A human being and doeth not become some being which
523is beyond human being by the addition of these to stated above attributes , then he continues
524to be a Human being and His Similarity stated above also continues and none of them ceaseth
525in any meaning or sense of the word TO CEASE.
526So if a Barailvi argues that The Essence Of the Holy Prophet is (a) Nu:r , then he cannot claim
527that the said Nu:r is a Non Matterial Substance with these two Additional Attributes.At best he
528can claimthat any thing OR ANY SUPPOSITUM OR ANY ESSENCE OR ANY SUBSTANCE OR
529ANY NATURE [whether an Human being or an animal being or a plant being or a material
530being or a spiritual being or a piece of mud or clay or a portion of liquid or a star or a planet
531what so ever] has only two Attributes stated above then it is a Nu:r.
532So if the Holy Prophet or His Essence Is Nu:r then:-a)
533 He doeth not cease to be a human being.
534b)He doeth not cease to be in likeness of other human being.
535It may be noted that the Essence of Holy Prophet is Identical to the Holy Prophet,
536and Identical to the very self Of the Holy Prophet since the Essence of every Person
537is identical to the Person and Identical to the Self of the person.[ A suppsitum may
538be defined as an Essence with Its All Essential Attributes, not mere Essence] . Also it
539may be noted that that the words in the square brackets is just an explanation and
540not a disgrace,]
541Thus it is clear that if Holy Prophet is Nu:r then he does not cease to be a Human
542Being [insa:n/Bashar] and also does not
543human beings , and does not cease to be Similar to other human beings WHO do
544lack these two Attributes.
4917
50
18
51
52
545So Nur is not some thing which is beyond human beings and has become a human
546being with out ceasing to be the nu:r, but the very human being it self. Since the
547word Nu:r can be used for any thing of any Nau which possess these two Attributes
548as stated above.
549Actually
Page |to
18claim that Nu:r is an Immeterial Substance can be trace back to the
550Dogma Of Saikh AL Ashraq AND Majus.
551Arabic concept of Nu:r is some what different from them.
552So if the word Nu:r means any thing that is phiscal light AND NOT A HUMAN BEING
553THEN in this meaning Holy Prophet is CERTAINLT Not Nu:r . But If It means any thing
554whether a human Essence or ANY THING ELSE which has only these two additional
555properties then Holy Prophet may be termed as Nu:r.It is not necessary that the
556word Nu:r means one that is Muz:hir for physical bodies and is Z:ahir as a physical
557body.
558In physical meaning the addition of just two non essential Attributes neither implies
559RITHTOUSNESS or WRONGNESS of the person. How ever in some non physical
560meaning it may be applied to ONLY lightous persons and essences.
561IN WHAT MEANING SOME ANCIENT COMMENTATORS CALLED HOLY
562PROPHET SALLALAHU ALAIHI VA SALLAMA AS NU:R
563Holy prophet exposed the TRUTH, THE TRUTH OF THE TRUE RELIGION, LAWS OF
564DEITY, SPEECH OF DEITY, VAH:Y etc. so He was termed as NU:R which neither
565contradicteth His Humanity and Of His Essence nor contradicteth his Similarity and
566likehood/likeness to other Human Beings and Human Essences. For an example one
567may quote I-MAM T-BRI:.
568The same is true for those Commentaries which use the word NU:R for the Essence Of HOLY PROPHET Peace be
569Upon Him.
Note. It may please be noted that some scholars have ascribed a Non
571Existential Attribute which is negation of Heat or Hotness, in order to exclude
572Fire from the definition of Nur. If Nur is heatless then even the Body Heat of a
573Person is sufficient to exclude a person from the definition of the word Nur.
570
574FIFTH
575There
PRIMILINARY
are several other possible options for the word NU:R like 1]
576ISLAM,2] VAH:Y GHAIR MATLU:3,]H:ICMAH , 4]HIDAYAH,5]NABVAH
577[NOTE THE DIFEERENCE BETWEEN NABI AND NABVAH],4] HAQQ
578[ REALITY] 5] SIDQ [TRUTH] 6]IMAN [FAITH]7] MA-ARFAH
5798]TAUHID[ABSOLUTE UNICITY OF DEITY]8] SHARIAH 9]TASDIQ UL
53
54
19
580AQAID.[TASDIQ
589Some
Sufis say that Nur of Book and Nur Of Tauhid are due to
594Divine Grace. DIVINE ESSENCE GUIDETH PEOPLE TOWORDS IT
595SELF BY ITS ATTRIBUTES. IT MAY BE SAID THAT NUR OF QURAN IS
596SOME THING ADDITIONAL TO QURAN. Generalizing it may be said
597that NUR is some thing which is ascribed to QURAN, TAUHID,HID
598DIN PROPHET ETC. AND MAKETH THEM ZAHIR, YET IT IS
599RECONGNIZATION AND SELF EVIDENT TO EACH PERSON.
600NOTE.
604CONCLUSION:605NU:R
606SIXTH Preliminary
607Literal
5519
56
20
57
58
609So
614B]
the traditions that the holy prophet was created from the nur
618of deity belongs to the set ofmutashabihat and cannot be used in
619arguments and argumentations.
620A
FABRICATION
621IN
PRIMILINARY.
59
60
21
638accepting
640SOME
PRIMILINARY
63
64
22
671refuge
66
23
703Humanity
707So
PRIMILINARY
711The
7151]
6723
68
69
70
24
732SIMILARITY
This is a special topic and one may see the word Nur in
754Quran For Quran itself. It may be discussed separately in
755an independent article.
753
756How
71
72
25
762BOTHE
778WITH
TENTH PRIMILINARY
785
7325
74
26
75
76
that Holy Prophet Was NOT a Nabui but just in the Fabric
793of a Nabui . Naudhubillanh.
792
Eleventh PRIMILINARY
800
807
1] Predicates Of A.
808
809
810
811
77
78
27
817
832
TWELVETH PRELIMINARY.
833
834
835
836
837One
7927
80
81
82
28
843So
83
84
29
876HOLY
887In
the end one may say If Holy Prophet is a Nur then His HOLY
888HUMANITY is higher then his Nuraniah, IOf He is Not Nur then He
889is AFDAL MIN CULL AN NUUR AL HADIS.
890
891I
892
893Books of Barailvism
8941] SUBHAANUSSUBUUH BY MAULVI RAZA OF BANS BARAILI UNITED
895PRIVINCES INDIA
8962] VASAYA SHARIF BY MAULVI RAZA OF BANS BARAILI UNITED
897PRIVINCES INDIA
898
8993] MALFUZAT BY MAULVI RAZA OF BANS BARAILI UNITED PRIVINCES
900INDIA
901
9024] -NBA AL MUSTAFA BY MAULVI RAZA OF BANS BARAILI UNITED
903PRIVINCES INDIA
8529
86
30
87
88
904
9055] AL AMAN WAL ULA BY MAULVI RAZA OF BANS BARAILI UNITED
906PRIVINCES INDIA
907
Page | 30
89
90
Page
31
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
9131
92
32
93
94
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
95
Page | 32