Counter Fort Retaining Walls Penul TPT Counterfort

Malana-II Design of counterfort retaining wall:
EL
EL
587
578
14 deg
30 deg
Unit weight of concrete
25 kN/m3
Unit weight of Backfill material
22 kN/m3
Bearing capacity of soil
SBC
Co-efficient of internal friction

Partial factor of safety
FOS
Grade of concrete
fck
Yield stress of steel
fy
Cover provided
Dimensioning of retaining wall:
Height of stem
Thickness of stem
Spacing of counterforts
Thickness of counterfort
Vertical component
Weight of earth fill
W5`
W1
Load
1
2
3
4
5
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
0.04 m
9
0.50
3.00
0.40
EL 578.00
1.5
4.00
W2
C
0.85
6.00
Toe
m
m
m
m
0.54545455
4.00 m
0.85 m
9.85 m
0.367
9.997 m
10.847 m
0.8593887
3.0
(Surcharge angle)
0.21043771
0.78956229
475.20 kN
Wh
461.08 kN
(Act at 1/3 of H)
Wv
114.96 kN
835.88 kN
(Act at end of Heel)
Description
Unit
Weight of stem
Weight of base slab
Weight of earth Fill
Earth pressure
Earth Pressure
kN
kN
kN
kN
kN
Total
W
P
Magnitude
Vertical
Horizontal
112.50
127.50
835.88
461.08
114.96
1190.84
kN
1190.84
kN
461.08
kN
Heel
(Assume)
1.50 m
6.00 m
W3
Total Vertical load

Total Horizontal load
W3
150 kN/m2
Stability Analysis:
Assume of 1m strip of retaining wall for stability analysis:
S.No
0.58
1.5
H
Ka
Active earth pressure co-efficient
Height of backfill at the end of base slab
Height of backfill at the end of base slab+base slab
We
Active Earth Pressure
Horziontal Component
W4`
20 N/mm2
B
b2
Heel width
Base slab thickness
Height of retaining wall
415 N/mm2
b1
Toe width
Base width
EL 587.00 0.50
9.997
Top level of retaining wall

Bottom level of counterfort
Surcharge angle
Angle of repose
Distance from
point A
1.75
3.00
4.00
3.62
6.00
Resisting
moment
196.88
382.50
3343.53
Overturning
moment
1667.17
689.77
4612.67
1667.17
4
6
Factors of safety:
Against oveturning:
FOS
2.77
FOS
1.49
Safe
Against sliding:
Unsafe, Shear Key Required
Pmax
302.98 kN/m2
>
150
Pmin
At Heel
93.97 kN/m2
Upward Pressure not exceding the Bearing capacity of soil
Design of stem:
<
150
At Toe
Pressure Intensity
Factored Pressure
P
Pu
117.53 kN/m2
Factored Moment
Mu
88.15 kNm
Thickness required
dreqd
0.179 m
Effective depth provided
deff
0.46 m
Area of steel required

Dia of bar
Spacing required
Ast
#VALUE! mm2/m
20 mm
#VALUE! mm
93.97
Pressure Distribution
233.31
2.47
0.527
250.73
z
e
302.98
Eccentricity calculation:
6.00
78.35 kN/m
Distribution reinf:
Dia of bar
Spacing required
Check for Shear:
Shear Force at the base
552 mm2/m
12 mm
200.00 mm
Shear stress devoloped
0.29852 N/mm2
Area of steel provided

Percentage of steel provided
#VALUE! mm2/m
#VALUE! %
Horizonatal reinf
Vertical reinf
149.26 kN
#VALUE! N/mm2
#VALUE!
Allowable shear stress

Check for development length:
M/V+L
Ld
M/V+LLd
Point of contraflexure:
1051
mm
L=12*dia or depth whichever is greater
940
mm
IS456:2000
Safe in Development Length
For fixed support with udl the point of contraflexure occurs at 0.211*L, so the main reinforcement has to be extended upto pt of
contraflexure from both the supports. At mid, 3/4 th of reinforcement shall be provided.
0.75
m
Since it may be difficult for detailing of reinforcement the same reinforcement shall be provided at both the tension and compression
face
Also main reinforcement shall be reduced at the top
Design of Toe Slab:

Maximum Bending moment acting on the toe slab is calculated by considering moments of all forces about the point c
S.No
Load
1
3
Wup1
W6
Description
Unit
Upward Pressure (ACEF)

Weight of Toe slab
kN
kN
Total
Maximum working moment

Factored moment
Thickness required
Effective Thickness Provided
Magnitude
Vertical
Horizontal
415.28
-31.88
383.40
297.35
446.03
0.40
0.81
Moment
about C
321.26
-23.91
297.35
kNm
kNm
m
m

Dia of bar
Spacing required
Ast3
#VALUE! mm2/m
25 mm
100.00 mm
Distribution reinf:
Dia of bar
Spacing required
Ast4
972 mm2/m
16 mm
200.00 mm
Distance from
point C
0.77
0.75
4908.739 mm2/m
a
b
c
(Parallel to the length of retaining wall)
(Parallel to counterfort)
7.491788
-292450.5
4.5E+008

Check for Shear: (Toe Slab)
Critical section for shear is at d distance from face of the stem.
Shear Force
Shear Stress
0.606 %
i.e
132.27 kN
0.69 m from A
0.163 N/mm2
#VALUE! N/mm2
#VALUE!
Design of Heel Slab:

Maximum Bending moment acting on the toe slab is calculated by considering moments of all forces about the point b
Weight of soil on strip
208.97 kN/m2
Self weight of heel slab
21.25 kN/m2
Total doward force
230.22 kN/m2
Upward pressure
93.97 kN/m2
Net Downward Pressure

Maximum negative moment
Factored Moment
Depth Provided
136.25
102.19
153.28
0.81
kN/m2
kNm
kNm
m
#VALUE! mm2/m
Area of steel requried

Minimum reinforcement required
Dia of bar
Spacing required
Percentage of reinforcement provided
Distribution reinforcement:
972
25
100.00
0.61
mm2/m
mm
mm
%
0.12% of c/s area

Dia of bar
Spacing required
Check for Shear:
Shear force developed
972 mm2/m
16 mm
200.00 mm
0.12% of c/s area
V
v
204.38 kN
Shear stress developed

#VALUE! N/mm2
#VALUE!
Design of counterforts:
Top width of counterfort
Bottom width of counterfort
Inclination angle of counterfort
Depth from face of the stem
Effective depth of counterforts
Maximum bending moment
Factored Bending moment
0.24 N/mm2
0.40
0.5
4.50
23.96
3.62
4.12
4609.60
6914.39
#VALUE! mm2/m

Min reinforcement required
Dia of bars
No. of bars
m
m
m
deg
m
m
kNm
kNm
4214.4 mm2/m
f
n
25 mm
#VALUE! nos
Check for Shear:

Shear force
0
4.50 m
326.72 kN
d'
V
v
Pt
0.20 N/mm2
#VALUE! %
#VALUE! N/mm2
#VALUE!
Curtailment of Counterfort bars:

Half the bars shall be curtailed at distance of
Connection between counterfort and stem:
Horizontal force
Factored Force
3.16 m from top

.
181.74
272.61
Steel required
Dia of bar required
Spacing required
Connection between counterfort and Heel slab:
755.04 mm2/m
20 mm
400.00 mm
Tension transferred in 1m width of counterfort near the heel

Factored force
Steel required
Dia of bar required
Spacing required
Design of shear Key:
340.63 kN/m2
510.95 kN
1415.16 mm2/m
20 mm
200.00 mm
Co-efficient of passive pressure
Kp
Upward pressure near the key

Let depth of shear key
Width of the shear key
P
a
250.73 kN/m2
0.50 m
0.50 m
Passive pressure developed
Kp*P
682.91 kN/m2
Total passive pressure
Pp *a
341.45 kN
Weight of earthfill in the key

Self weight of the key
FOS against sliding
Wa
2.72
66 kN
1190.84 kN
2.31
Cost Estimation:
Cost compuatation for counterfort spacing
S.No
Component
C/s area
Thicness/Le
ngth
m
4.50
5.10
18.00
m
3.00
3.00
0.40
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Stem
Base Slab
Counter forts
Steel in Stem
Toe Slab
Heel Slab
Counterfort (1 No.)
Quantity
m
13.50
15.30
7.20
#VALUE!
0.415
1.107
2.447
Total
3
Rate
Rs/m
4500.00
4500.00
4500.00
45000.00
45000.00
45000.00
45000.00
cost
3
Cost
Rs
60750.00
68850.00
32400.00
#VALUE!
18682.478
49819.942
110095.08
#VALUE!

Surcharge angle
Angle of repose
EL
EL
1403
1393
5 deg
30 deg
25 kN/m3

18 kN/m3
150 kN/m2
SBC

Height of stem
Thickness of stem
Toe width
Base width
0.5
10 m
0.4 m
3.5 m
L
b1
1.5
1.5 m
6m
B
b2
Heel width
Base slab thickness
(Assume)
4.1 m
0.7 m
Ka
0.337
(Surcharge angle)
Stability Analysis:
S.No
Load
1
2
3
4
W1
W2
W3
W4
Description
Weight of stem
Weight of base slab
Horizontal earth pressure

Total Vertical load
Unit
Magnitude
kN
kN
kN
kN
Total
100.00
105.00
738.00
303.48
1246.48
W
P
Distance
from Heel
1.70
3.00
3.95
3.33
943.00 kN
303.48
Factors of safety:
Against oveturning:
FOS =
3.36
Safe
FOS =
1.55
Safe
Against sliding:
Resisting
moment
170.000
315.000
2915.100
3400.10
Overturning
moment
1011.59
1011.59
0.4
10.00
4.1
0.70
6
Malana-II Design of Cantilever retaining wall:

Surcharge angle
Angle of repose
EL
EL
1398
1393
0 deg
30 deg
EL 1398.00
0.250
25 kN/m3
18 kN/m3

SBC
125 kN/m2
0.50
1.5
Grade of concrete
fck
20 N/mm
fy
C
415 N/mm2
0.04 m
FOS

Cover provided
Height of stem
height of back fill
Thickness of stem at Top
Thickness of stem at Bottom
3.00
2
EL 1393.00
h
5
3
5.45
0.250
0.45
b1
Toe width
Base width
0.45
0.70
0.45
(Assume)
3.00
0.70 m
3.00 m
B
b2
Heel width
Base slab thickness
m
m
m
m
m
1.85 m
0.45 m

Ka
0.333
3.000 m
H1
3.450 m
We
35.71 kN
Wh
35.71 kN
(Act at 1/3 of H)
Vertical component
Wv
0.00 kN
99.90 kN
W3
S.No
Load
Description
W1
Weight of stem
kN
2
3
4
W2
W3
W4
W5
Weight of Base slab

Weight of Earth fill
Earth Pressure
Earth Pressure
kN
kN
kN
kN
Magnitude
Unit
Total
Total vertical Load
Total Horizontal Load
Factors of safety:
Against oveturning:
(Surcharge angle)
Vertical
31.25
12.50
33.75
99.90
Horizontal
7.31
FOS
2.48
Resisting
moment
1.025
0.83
1.50
2.08
1.15
3.00
32.03
10.42
50.63
207.29
35.71
0.00
177.40
177.40 kN
35.71 kN
FOS
Distance from
point A
35.71
Overturnin
g moment
41.06
0.00
300.37
41.06
Safe
Against sliding:
Safe, Shear Key Not Required
At Toe
At Heel
Design of stem:
Height of stem
Moment at the base
Factored Moment
Thickness required
Thickness Provided
Pmax
63.67 kN/m2
<
125
Pmin
54.60 kN/m2
<
125
M
Mu
3.00 m
27.00 kNm
40.50 kNm
d
dpro
0.121 m
0.41 m
#VALUE! mm2/m
Ast
Min reinforcement
492 mm2/m
32 mm
#VALUE! mm
#VALUE! mm2/m
#VALUE! %
Dia of bar provided

Spacing provided
Reinforcement provided
Distribution reinf:
Dia of bar provided
Spacing provided
pt
492.00
10 mm
150.00 mm
Check for shear:

35.71 kN
0.09 N/mm2
#VALUE! N/mm2
#VALUE!
Permissible shear stress

Design of heel slab:
S.No
Load
1
2
W2
W3
Description
Weight of heel slab
Unit
kN
kN
Magnitude
Vertical
Horizontal
20.81
0.00
Distance from
point B
0.925
0.00
Moment about B
+ve
-ve
19.2515625
0.00
60.19
61.55
1.46
0.038
63.67
z
e
3.00
3
4
W4
W5

Upward Pressure
kN
kN
Total
35.71
106.18
162.70
1.00
0.94
35.71
54.96
99.8131393
99.81
Net downward force

Netupward force
Net force
Net working moment
Factored moment
Depth required
M
Mu
dreqd
dprov
Ast
Reinforcement reqd
56.52
106.18
-49.66
44.85
67.28
0.16
0.41
#VALUE!
kN
kN
kN
kNm
kNm
m
m
492 mm2/m
20 mm
#VALUE! mm
#VALUE! mm2/m
#VALUE! %
Min reinf
Dia of bar
Spacing reqd
Percentage of steel
Check for Shear:
-49.66 kN
-0.12 N/mm2
#VALUE! N/mm2
#VALUE!
Minimum reinforcement:
492 mm2/m
10 mm
150.00 mm
Min reinf
Dia of bar
Spacing reqd
Design of toe slab:
S.No
Load
W1
W2
Description
Weight of toe slab
Upward Pressure
Total vertical force

Net working moment
Factored moment
Depth required
Reinforcement reqd
Magnitude
Vertical
Horizontal
7.88
43.83
51.70
35.95 kN
12.67 kNm
19.00 kNm
0.08 m
0.41 m
Unit
kN
kN
Total
M
Mu
dreqd
d prov
Ast
Distance from
point C
0.35
0.35
+ve
Moment about C
-ve
2.75625
15.4253158
2.76
15.43
#VALUE! mm2/m
492.00 mm2/m
20 mm
#VALUE! mm
Min reinf
Dia of bar
Spacing reqd
#VALUE! mm2/m
#VALUE! %
Minimum reinforcement:
Min reinf
Dia of bar
Spacing reqd
492.00 mm2/m
10 mm
150.00 mm

Kp

P
a
Kp*P
Pp *a

FOS against sliding
Wa
3.00
61.55 kN/m2
0.35 m
0.35 m
184.65 kN/m2
64.63 kN
18.9 kN
177.40 kN
4.56
Cost Estimation:
S.No
Component
C/s area
m
1
2
3
4
5
Stem
Base slab
Steel in stem
Steel in Heel slab
Steel in Toe slab
1.75
1.35
Thicness/L
ength
m
17.885
17.885
Quantity
Rate
m3
31.30
24.14
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
Rs/m3
Rs
3500.00 109545.625
3500.00 84506.625
38000.00
#VALUE!
38000.00
#VALUE!
38000.00
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
Cost Comparison:
a)
Cantilever Retaining wall
#VALUE! Rs
b)
Counterfort Retaining wall
#VALUE! Rs
It is suggested to provide Counterfort type retaining wall
a)
The retaining wall height is greater than 6.0m, it is economical to proivde counterfort type retaining wall.
Cost
3.000
1.85
54.60
3.00
3.00
Design of counterfort retaining wall:

EL
EL
590
582
0 deg
20 deg
25 kN/m3
18 kN/m3
SBC

FOS
Grade of concrete
fck
fy
Cover provided
Height of stem
Thickness of stem
W4`
W5`
312.29179308
W1
W3
400 kN/m2
0.50
1.5
25 N/mm2
0.04 m
8
0.50
3.00
0.40
EL 582.00
0.75
3.75
W2
0.50
Toe
m
m
m
m
0.75 m
5.00 m
B
b2
Heel width
Base slab thickness
500 N/mm2
b1
Toe width
Base width
EL 590.00 0.50
8.000

Surcharge angle
Angle of repose
3.75 m
0.50 m
8.50 m
Heel
6250
(Assume)
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
0.545
0.859
3.0
#VALUE!
4
6
H
Ka
We
318.81 kN
Wh
318.81 kN
(Act at 1/3 of H)
3.101
Wv
0.00 kN
540.00 kN
0.016
0.127
1.526
Vertical component
0.490
8.000 m
8.500 m
W3
50
(Surcharge angle)
0.210
0.790
0.137
0.050
Stability Analysis:
S.No
Load
1
2
3
4
5
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
Description
Unit
Weight of stem
Weight of base slab
Earth pressure
Earth Pressure
kN
kN
kN
kN
kN
Total
W
P
Total Vertical load

Magnitude
Vertical
Horizontal
100.00
62.50
540.00
318.81
0.00
702.50
kN
702.50
kN
318.81
kN
Distance from
point A
1.00
2.50
3.13
2.83
5.00
Resisting
moment
100.00
156.25
1687.50
Overturning
moment
903.30
0.00
1943.75
903.30
Factors of safety:
Against oveturning:
FOS
2.15
FOS
1.10
Safe
Against sliding:
Unsafe, Shear Key Required
0.83
Pmax
312.29 kN/m2
Pmin
At Heel
-31.29 kN/m2
Design of stem:
At Toe
Pressure Intensity
<
400
<
400
P
Pu
70.60 kN/m
564.81476724
Factored Pressure
105.90 kN/m2
282.40738362
Factored Moment
Mu
79.43 kNm
282.40738362
Thickness required
dreqd
0.152 m
1035.4937399 547.85319
deff
0.46 m

Dia of bar
Spacing required
Ast
#VALUE! mm2/m
20 mm
#VALUE! mm
Horizonatal reinf
-31.29
226.40
1.48
1.019
260.75
z
e
312.29
5.00
314.159265
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
Distribution reinf:
Dia of bar
Spacing required
Check for Shear:
552 mm2/m
12 mm
200.00 mm
0.30164 N/mm2
256345.5

#VALUE! mm2/m
#VALUE! %
2.92254E-005
7.4917875
Vertical reinf
150.82 kN
#VALUE! N/mm2
#VALUE!
M/V+LLd
M/V+L
987
mm
Ld
940
mm
IS456:2000
0.75
m
Since it may be difficult for detailing of reinforcement the same reinforcement shall be provided at both the tension and compression face
Design of Toe Slab:

S.No
Load
1
3
Wup1
W6
Description
Magnitude
Vertical
Horizontal
214.89
-9.38
-
Unit

Weight of Toe slab
kN
kN
Total
205.52
79.48
119.23
0.19
0.46

Factored moment
Thickness required
79.48
Ast3
#VALUE! mm2/m
25 mm
100.00 mm
Distribution reinf:
Dia of bar
Spacing required
Ast4
552 mm2/m
16 mm
200.00 mm
Shear Stress
Moment
about C
83.00
-3.52
kNm
kNm
m
m

Dia of bar
Spacing required

Shear Force
Distance from
point C
0.39
0.38
4908.739 mm2/m
1.067 %
i.e
29.80 kN
0.29 m from A
0.065 N/mm2
#VALUE! N/mm2
#VALUE!

144.00 kN/m2
12.5 kN/m2
Total doward force
156.50 kN/m2
Upward pressure
-31.29 kN/m2

Factored Moment
Depth Provided
187.79
140.84
211.27
0.46
kN/m2
kNm
kNm
m
#VALUE! mm2/m

Dia of bar
Spacing required
Distribution reinforcement:
552
25
100.00
1.07
mm2/m
mm
mm
%
0.12% of c/s area

Dia of bar
Spacing required
Check for Shear:
552 mm2/m
16 mm
200.00 mm
0.12% of c/s area
V
v
281.69 kN

#VALUE! N/mm2
#VALUE!
0.56 N/mm2
0.40
0.5
4.25
25.11
3.36
3.86
2550.49
3825.74
#VALUE! mm2/m
3277.2 mm2/m

Dia of bars
m
m
m
deg
m
m
kNm
kNm
32 mm
No. of bars
Check for Shear:
#VALUE! nos
Shear force
d'
V
v
Pt
4.26 m
284.86 kN
0.18 N/mm2
#VALUE! %
#VALUE! N/mm2
#VALUE!

Horizontal force
Factored Force
2.83 m from top

.
176.50
264.76
Steel required
Dia of bar required
Spacing required
608.64 mm2/m
16 mm
325.00 mm

Factored force
Steel required
Dia of bar required
Spacing required
469.48 kN/m2
704.22 kN
1618.89 mm2/m
16 mm
100.00 mm
Kp

P
a
260.75 kN/m2
0.50 m
0.50 m
Kp*P
531.84 kN/m2
Pp *a
265.92 kN

FOS against sliding
Wa
45 kN
702.50 kN
2.01
2.04
Cost Estimation:
S.No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Component
Stem
Base Slab
Counter forts
Steel in Stem
Toe Slab
Heel Slab
Counterfort (1 No.)
C/s area
Thicness/Le
ngth
m2
4.00
2.50
15.00
m
3.00
3.00
0.40
Quantity
m3
12.00
7.50
6.00
#VALUE!
0.219
1.049
3.134
Total
Rate
Rs/m3
4500.00
4500.00
4500.00
45000.00
45000.00
45000.00
45000.00
cost
Cost
Rs
54000.00
33750.00
27000.00
#VALUE!
9858.1293
47223.086
141010.82
#VALUE!
Design of counterfort retaining wall:

EL
EL
590
582
0 deg
30 deg
25 kN/m3
22 kN/m3
SBC

FOS
Grade of concrete
fck
fy
Cover provided
Height of stem
Thickness of stem
W4`
W5`
175.100
W1
W3
400 kN/m2
0.50
1.5
25 N/mm2
0.04 m
8
0.50
3.00
0.40
EL 582.00
1.5
4.00
W2
C
0.50
Toe
m
m
m
m
1.50 m
6.00 m
B
b2
Heel width
Base slab thickness
500 N/mm2
b1
Toe width
Base width
EL 590.00 0.50
8.000

Surcharge angle
Angle of repose
4.00 m
0.50 m
8.50 m
Heel
6250
(Assume)
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
0.545
0.859
3.0
#VALUE!
4
6
H
Ka
We
264.92 kN
Wh
264.92 kN
(Act at 1/3 of H)
3.101
Wv
0.00 kN
704.00 kN
0.016
0.127
1.526
Vertical component
0.333
8.000 m
8.500 m
W3
50
(Surcharge angle)
0.210
0.790
0.137
0.050
Stability Analysis:
S.No
Load
1
2
3
4
5
W1
W2
W3
W4
W5
Description
Unit
Weight of stem
Weight of base slab
Earth pressure
Earth Pressure
kN
kN
kN
kN
kN
Total
W
P
Total Vertical load

Magnitude
Vertical
Horizontal
100.00
75.00
704.00
264.92
0.00
879.00
kN
879.00
kN
264.92
kN
Distance from
point A
1.75
3.00
4.00
2.83
6.00
Resisting
moment
175.00
225.00
2816.00
Overturning
moment
750.60
0.00
3216.00
750.60
Factors of safety:
Against oveturning:
FOS
4.28
FOS
1.66
Safe
Against sliding:
Safe, Shear Key Not Required
1.00
Pmax
175.10 kN/m2
Pmin
At Heel
117.90 kN/m2
Design of stem:
At Toe
Pressure Intensity
<
400
<
400
P
Pu
59 kN/m
469.33333333
Factored Pressure
88 kN/m2
234.66666667
Factored Moment
Mu
66 kNm
234.66666667
Thickness required
dreqd
deff
0.46 m

Dia of bar
Spacing required
Ast
#VALUE! mm2/m
20 mm
#VALUE! mm
0.138 m
276 mm2/m
12 mm
400 mm
Distribution reinf: on each face

Dia of bar
Spacing required
Check for Shear:
117.90
156.03
2.80
0.195
160.80
z
e
175.10
6.00
860.44444444 499.40383
Horizonatal reinf
314.159265
#VALUE!
#VALUE!
Vertical reinf
126 kN

0.252 N/mm2
256345.5
#VALUE! mm2/m
#VALUE! %
2.92254E-005
7.4917875
#VALUE! N/mm2
#VALUE!
M/V+LLd
M/V+L
984
mm
Ld
940
mm
IS456:2000
0.75
m
Since it may be difficult for detailing of reinforcement the same reinforcement shall be provided at both the tension and compression face
Design of Toe Slab:

S.No
Load
1
3
Wup1
W6
Description
Magnitude
Vertical
Horizontal
251.92
-18.75
-
Unit

Weight of Toe slab
kN
kN
Total
233.17
178
266
0.28
0.46

Factored moment
Thickness required
177.56
Ast3
#VALUE! mm2/m
25 mm
100 mm
Distribution reinf: on each face

Dia of bar
Spacing required
Ast4
276 mm2/m
12 mm
200 mm
Shear Stress
Moment
about C
191.62
-14.06
kNm
kNm
m
m

Dia of bar
Spacing required

Shear Force
Distance from
point C
0.76
0.75
4909 mm2/m
1.067 %
i.e
121 kN
1.04 m from A
0.264 N/mm2
#VALUE! N/mm2
#VALUE!

176 kN/m2
12.5 kN/m2
Total doward force
189 kN/m2
Upward pressure
118 kN/m2

Factored Moment
Depth Provided
71
53
79
0.46
#VALUE! mm2/m

Dia of bar
Spacing required
Distribution reinforcement:on each face
Dia of bar
Spacing required
Check for Shear:
kN/m2
kNm
kNm
m
mm2/m
mm
mm
%
0.12% of c/s area
276 mm2/m
12 mm
200 mm
0.12% of c/s area
552
20
250
0.27
V
v
105.90 kN

#VALUE! N/mm2
#VALUE!
0.21 N/mm2
0.40
0.50
4.50
26.57
3.54
4.04
2119
3179
#VALUE! mm2/m
3432 mm2/m

Dia of bars
m
m
m
deg
m
m
kNm
kNm
32 mm
No. of bars
Check for Shear:
#VALUE! nos
Shear force
d'
V
v
Pt
4.51 m
235 kN
0.15 N/mm2
#VALUE! %
#VALUE! N/mm2
#VALUE!

Horizontal force
Factored Force
2.83 m from top
To be seen later
.
147
220
Steel required
Dia of bar required
Spacing required
506 mm2/m
16 mm
375 mm

Factored force
176 kN/m2
265 kN
Steel required
Dia of bar required
Spacing required
609 mm2/m
16 mm
325 mm
Kp
3.00

P
a
161 kN/m2
0.50 m
0.50 m
Kp*P
482 kN/m2
Pp *a
241 kN

FOS against sliding
Wa
W
66 kN
879 kN
2.69
Cost Estimation:
S.No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Component
Stem
Base Slab
Counter forts
Steel in Stem
Toe Slab
Heel Slab
Counterfort (1 No.)
C/s area
Thicness/Le
ngth
m2
4.00
3.00
16.00
m
3.00
3.00
0.40
Quantity
Rate
m3
Rs/m3
12.00
4500
9.00
4500
6.40
4500
#VALUE!
45000
0.384
45000
0.341
45000
2.797
45000
Total cost
Cost
Rs
54000
40500
28800
#VALUE!
17293
15350
125853
#VALUE!

Counter Fort Retaining Walls Penul TPT Counterfort

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Counter Fort Retaining Walls Penul TPT Counterfort

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Malana-II Design of counterfort retaining wall:

Unit weight of concrete

Unit weight of Backfill material

Bearing capacity of soil

Co-efficient of internal friction

Yield stress of steel

(Act at end of Heel)

Total Vertical load

Top level of retaining wall

Effective depth provided

Area of steel required

Shear stress devoloped

Area of steel provided

Allowable shear stress

L=12*dia or depth whichever is greater

Safe in Development Length

Design of Toe Slab:

Upward Pressure (ACEF)

Maximum working moment

Area of steel required

Area of steel provided

(Parallel to the length of retaining wall)

Percentage of steel provided

Allowable shear stress

Design of Heel Slab:

Self weight of heel slab

Net Downward Pressure

Area of steel requried

0.12% of c/s area

Area of steel required

0.12% of c/s area

Shear stress developed

Area of steel required

Check for Shear:

Percentage of steel provided

Allowable shear stress

Curtailment of Counterfort bars:

3.16 m from top

Tension transferred in 1m width of counterfort near the heel

Co-efficient of passive pressure

Upward pressure near the key

Passive pressure developed

Total passive pressure

Weight of earthfill in the key

Top level of retaining wall

Unit weight of concrete

Unit weight of Backfill material

Co-efficient of internal friction

Active earth pressure co-efficient

Total Horizontal load

Malana-II Design of Cantilever retaining wall:

Unit weight of concrete

Unit weight of Backfill material

Bearing capacity of soil

Yield stress of steel

Active earth pressure co-efficient

Height of backfill at the end of base slab+base slab

Active Earth Pressure

(Act at end of Heel)

Weight of Base slab

Dia of bar provided

Check for shear:

Shear stress developed