Example 1 - Geotechnical Data Report

Geotechnical Data Report
Proposed I-71 HDD Cores D12-A and D12-B

Ashland County, Ohio
March 27, 2015
Terracon Project No. N4149328
Prepared for:
Project Consulting Services, Inc.
Prepared by:
Terracon Consultants, Inc.
Columbus, Ohio
March 27, 2015

Project Consulting Services, Inc.
155 Lafayette Road
Suite 2
New Hampton, NH 03862
Attn:
Mr. Ronald P. Gourgeot, Jr., P.E.

P: [603] 379 6490
E: rgourgeot@projectconsulting.com
Re:

Proposed I-71 HDD Cores D12-A and D12-B
Dear Mr. Gourgeot:

Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) has completed the geotechnical field and laboratory
services for the proposed I-71 HDD project. This report presents the findings of the subsurface
exploration and results of laboratory tests performed on selected soil and rock samples.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions
concerning this report, or if we may be of further service, please contact us.
Sincerely,
Mohammad Kayser
Staff Engineer
Steven B. Larimer
Staff Geologist
Prasad S. Rege, P.E.

Regional Manager/Senior Principal

P [614] 863 3113
800 Morrison Road

F [614] 863 0475
Columbus, Ohio 43230
terracon.com
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Page
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1
PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 1
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ........................................................................................ 2
3.1
Geology ............................................................................................................... 2
3.2
Typical Subsurface Profile ................................................................................... 2
3.3
Water Level Observations .................................................................................... 3
GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN PARAMETERS.................................................................... 3
4.1
Soil and Rock Parameters ................................................................................... 3
GENERAL COMMENTS ................................................................................................. 4
APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION

Field Exploration Description ............................................................................Exhibit A-1
Boring Location Plan ........................................................................................Exhibit A-2
Boring Logs ........................................................................................... Exhibit A-3 to A-4
Subsurface Profile ............................................................................................Exhibit A-5
APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING
Laboratory Testing............................................................................................Exhibit B-1
Laboratory Test Results....................................................................... Exhibit B-2 to B-28
APPENDIX C SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
General Notes ................................................................................................ Exhibit C-1
Unified Soil Classification System.................................................................... Exhibit C-2
Description of Rock Properties ........................................................................ Exhibit C-3
Sample Photos ................................................................................................ Exhibit C-4
GEOTECHNICAL DATA REPORT

PROPOSED I-71 HDD CORES D12-A AND D12-B
ASHLAND COUNTY, OHIO
March 27, 2015
1.0
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of our geotechnical field and laboratory services performed for the
proposed I-71 HDD project located in Ashland County, Ohio. Our scope of work for this project
included the advancement of two (2) borings, designated D12-A and D12-B which were extended
to an approximate depth range of 70 to 75 feet below the existing ground surface, visual
classification and laboratory testing of representative soil and rock samples, groundwater sample
lab results (if applicable) and preparation of this geotechnical data report. Logs of the borings and
a boring location plan are included in Appendix A of this report.
2.0
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project consists of crossing Interstate 71 using horizontal directional drilling means and
methods for the Rover Pipeline Project. Details are presented below for your information.
Item
Locations
Description
Boring D12-A (4049'1.62"N 8220'55.12"W) is located on the
south side of Interstate 71 and D12-B (4049'4.93"N
8220'59.65"W) is located on the north side of Interstate 71.
Current Ground Cover
The existing ground cover in the area of the proposed HDD

pipeline is mainly mowed grass fields, agricultural fields, and
wooded areas.
Existing Topography
Based on provided survey information, the ground surface

elevation across the proposed HDD pipeline alignment ranges
from about elevation 1308 to 1314 feet.
Structures
Horizontally directionally drilled (HDD) natural gas pipeline

crossings. A bridge runs across the proposed HDD.
Responsive Resourceful Reliable

Proposed I-71 HDD Cores D12-A and D12-B Ashland County, Ohio
March 27, 2015 Terracon Project No. N4149328
3.0
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
3.1
Geology
The project area is located in the physiographic region known as the Central Lowland Till Plain
generally characterized as having Pleistocene-age cohesive till and, more specifically, within the
Killbuck-Glaciated Pittsburgh Plateau (ridges and flat uplands generally above 1200 feet,
covered with thin drift and dissected by steep valleys; valley segments alternate between broad
drift-filled and narrow rock-walled reaches; elevation 600 feet -1505 feet) overlying
Mississippian-age sedimentary bedrock from the Maxville Limestone (which was not
encountered at these sites); Rushville (not encountered at these sites), Logan, and Cuyahoga
Formations, Undivided.
The Rushville, Logan, and Cuyahoga Formations, Undivided is shale, siltstone and sandstone
that is interbedded. Sandstone is the dominant rock type however, lithology percentages vary
geographically. It is typically various shades of gray, yellow and brown in color, thin to very
thick bedding, fine to coarse grained, occasionally fossiliferous, and sometimes can be
conglomeratic with lithology composed of mainly quartz granules and pebbles. Unit was derived
from sediments that were eroded from Devonian aged Highlands and Mississippian aged
sediments that were transported by rivers and streams and deposited into the shallow sea that
covered this area during Mississippian time. Compressive strength in unweathered rock is
typically medium to high but is typically much lower in areas where siltstone and shale interbeds
occur. Weathered zones typically have low to high compressive strength depending on extent
of weathering. Siltstones and shales are susceptible to slaking. It is overlain by the Pottsville
Group and underlain by the Sunbury shale.
D12-A and D12-B are both located within the Canfield Silt Loam
The Canfield series consists of very deep, moderately well drained soils formed in low-lime
Wisconsinan-age till on till plains. Commonly, the till is thinly mantled with loess. Slope ranges
from 0 to 35 percent. Saturated hydraulic conductivity is moderately high above the fragipan
and moderately low in the fragipan and substratum.
3.2
Typical Subsurface Profile
Boring D12-A encountered native cohesive soils (sandy lean clay and sandy lean clay with gravel)
of medium stiff to very stiff consistency to a depth of about 20 feet below existing grades. The
cohesive soils were underlain by sandstone bedrock. The test boring was terminated at an
approximate depth of 75 feet below the existing ground surface.
Boring D12-B encountered native cohesive soils (lean clay with sand and sandy lean clay) of
medium stiff to stiff consistency to a depth of about 15 feet below the existing ground. These soil

layers were underlain by sandstone bedrock to the test boring termination depth of approximately
70 feet below the existing ground surface.
Specific conditions encountered at each boring location are indicated on the individual boring logs.
Stratification boundaries on the boring logs represent the approximate location of changes in soil
types; in-situ, the transition between materials may be gradual.
3.3
Water Level Observations
The boreholes were observed while drilling for the presence and level of groundwater.
Groundwater was encountered in borings D12-A and D12-B at a depth range of about 5 to 23 feet
while drilling.
Groundwater level fluctuations occur due to seasonal variations in the amount of rainfall, runoff
and other factors not evident at the time the borings were performed. In addition, perched or
trapped water can develop over low permeability soils. Therefore, groundwater levels during
construction or at other times in the life of the structure may be higher or lower than the levels
indicated on the boring logs. The possibility of groundwater level fluctuations should be
considered when developing the design and construction plans for the project.
4.0
GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN PARAMETERS
4.1
Soil and Rock Parameters
Based on the borings and laboratory test results, the following shear strength and unit weight
values may be considered for design:
Soil description
Average Undrained
Shear Strength, su (psf)
Angle of Internal
Friction,
(degrees)
Total Unit Weight

of Soil, (pcf)
Medium stiff cohesive soils

(sandy lean clay and lean clay
with sand)
1000
--
125
Stiff to very stiff cohesive soils

(sandy lean clay and lean clay
with sand)
2000
--
128
Rock description
Average Unconfined
Compressive Strength (tsf)
Total Unit Weight of

Rock, (pcf)
Moderately hard (sandstone)
350
140

5.0
GENERAL COMMENTS
The information presented in this report is based upon the data obtained from the borings
performed at the indicated locations, laboratory testing of selected samples obtained from the
borings and from other information discussed in this report. This report does not reflect
variations that may occur between borings, across the site, or due to the modifying effects of
construction or weather. The nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until
during or after construction.
The scope of services for this project does not include either specifically or by implication any
environmental or biological (e.g., mold, fungi, bacteria) assessment of the site or identification or
prevention of pollutants, hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner is concerned about the
potential for such contamination or pollution, other studies should be undertaken.
This data report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client for specific application to
the project discussed and has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
geotechnical engineering practices. No warranties, either expressed or implied, are intended or
made. Site safety, excavation support, and dewatering requirements are the responsibility of
others. In the event that changes in the nature, design, or location of the project as outlined in
this report are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not
be considered valid unless Terracon reviews the changes and either verifies or modifies the
conclusions of this report in writing.
APPENDIX A
FIELD EXPLORATION

Field Exploration Description

The subsurface exploration consisted of drilling and sampling two (2) borings at the site within a
depth of range about 70 to 75 feet below existing grades. The boring locations were staked in
the field by the Rover Pipeline surveyor. The approximate boring locations are indicated on the
attached Boring Location Plan. Surveyed elevations at the ground surface were provided by the
surveyor. Elevations are rounded to the nearest foot. The locations and elevations of the borings
should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the means and methods used to
define them.
The borings were drilled with a track-mounted rotary drill rig using continuous flight hollow-stem
augers to advance the boreholes. Samples of the soil encountered in the borings were obtained
using the split barrel sampling procedures. Water was added at 30 and 28.5 feet in borings D12-A
and D12-B respectively to assist drilling.
In the split-barrel sampling procedure, the number of blows required to advance a standard 2-inch
O.D. split-barrel sampler the last 12 inches of the typical total 18-inch penetration by means of a
140-pound auto-hammer with a free fall of 30 inches, is the standard penetration resistance value
(SPT-N). This value is used to estimate the in-situ relative density of cohesionless soils and
consistency of cohesive soils. An automatic SPT hammer was used to advance the split-barrel
sampler in the borings performed on this site. A significantly greater efficiency is achieved with
the automatic hammer compared to the conventional safety hammer operated with a cathead and
rope. This higher efficiency has an appreciable effect on the SPT-N value. The effect of the
automatic hammer's efficiency has been considered in the interpretation and analysis of the
subsurface information for this report.
Rock coring was performed in both borings using a NQ2-size double tube-swivel core barrel.
Recovery and rock quality designation (RQD) were calculated for the core samples and are noted
at their depths of occurrence on the boring logs. RQD is the percent of total length cored
consisting only of rock pieces at least 4 inches or more in length and is a measure of the integrity
of the rock mass in-situ. Rock quality, in terms of RQD, can generally be designated as excellent
(90%-100%), good (75%-90%), fair (50%-75%), poor (25%-50%) and very poor (<25%). The
recovered samples were sent to the laboratory for testing and classification.
The samples were tagged for identification, sealed to reduce moisture loss, and taken to our
laboratory for further examination, testing, and classification. Information provided on the boring
logs attached to this report includes soil descriptions, consistency evaluations, boring depths,
sampling intervals, and any groundwater conditions. The borings were backfilled with cement
bentonite grout prior to the drill crew leaving the site.
A field log of each boring was prepared by the field engineer/geologist. These logs included visual
classifications of the materials encountered during drilling, as well as, the engineer/geologists
interpretation of the subsurface conditions between samples. Final boring logs included with this
Exhibit A-1
report represent the geologist's interpretation of the field logs and include modifications based on
laboratory observation and tests of the samples.
Exhibit A-1
D12-B
D12-A
APPROXIMATE
BORING
LOCATION
DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION
ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR
CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES
Project No.
Project Manager:
PSR
N4149328
Scale:
Drawn by:
N.T.S.
MK
Checked by:
File Name:
PSR
N4149328 BLP
800 Morrison Road
Date:
Approved by:
PSR
March. 2015
PH. (614) 863-3113
Columbus, Ohio 43230

FAX. (614) 863-0475
TEST BORING LOCATION PLAN
Exhibit
I-71 HDD Cores D12-A and D12-B

Various Locations in Ohio
A-2
BORING LOG NO. D12-A

PROJECT: ETC Rover Pipeline
CLIENT: Project Consulting Services, Inc.

New Hampton, NH
1.5
14
3-3-3
N=6
0.25
(HP)
30
18
5-9-10
N=19
2.0
(HP)
13
18
4-5-6
N=11
1.5
(HP)
16
18
6-8-17
N=25
2.5
(HP)
16
16
4-4-5
N=9
1.25
(HP)
14
14
19-10-16
N=26
1312.5
RQD %
WATER
CONTENT (%)
ELEVATION (Ft.)
SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, dark brown,

medium stiff
LABORATORY
TORVANE/HP (tsf)
DEPTH
Penetration Per foot
Surface Elev.: 1314 (Ft.)
FIELD TEST
RESULTS
Longitude: -82.348644
RECOVERY (In.)
Latitude: 40.817117
SAMPLE TYPE
LOCATION I-71 HDD
WATER LEVEL
OBSERVATIONS
Mainline Segment (various locations in OH)
DEPTH (Ft.)
GRAPHIC LOG
SITE:
Page 1 of 3
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
LL-PL-PI
SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, brown to dark

brown, very stiff
noted iron stainings @ 3.5 feet
THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL ETC ROVER PIPLINE MAINLINE.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 3/26/15
5.0
1309

brown, stiff
10.0
1304

brown, very stiff
15.0
1299
SANDY LEAN CLAY WITH GRAVEL (CL),

brownish-gray to gray, stiff
20.0
1294
SANDSTONE, completely weathered, orangish-brown

to yellowish-brown, soft
25-15-10
10
15
23-14-9
20
11
25
Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.
Advancement Method:
3.25" Hollow Stem Auger
Hammer Type: Automatic
See Exhibit A-1 for description of field procedures

See Appendix B for description of laboratory
procedures and additional data (if any).
Abandonment Method:
Boring backfilled with cement/bentonite grout upon
completion.
Notes:
Water was encountered at 5 feet while drilling
Encountered hard layer at 7 feet
See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and

abbreviations.
WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS

Water observed at 5 feet while drilling
800 Morrison Road
Columbus, Ohio
Boring Started: 1/16/2015
Boring Completed: 1/16/2015
Drill Rig: Track
Driller: Bartlett
Project No.: N4149328
Exhibit:
A-3


New Hampton, NH
ELEVATION (Ft.)
WATER
CONTENT (%)
RQD %
LABORATORY
TORVANE/HP (tsf)
DEPTH
FIELD TEST
RESULTS
RECOVERY (In.)
Latitude: 40.817117
SAMPLE TYPE
LOCATION I-71 HDD
WATER LEVEL
OBSERVATIONS
DEPTH (Ft.)
GRAPHIC LOG
SITE:
Page 2 of 3
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
LL-PL-PI
SANDSTONE, completely weathered, orangish-brown

to yellowish-brown, soft (continued)
30.0
1284
SANDSTONE, fresh to moderately weathered,

moderately hard, close joints, thin to thick bedding, fair to
good RQD, tight to open, brown and gray, contains few
interbedded shales and argillaceous laminations, pyritic
30
2.0m
2.5m
22
26
1.5m
2.0m
1.5m
35
1.8m
59
60
2.0m
Qu = 339.44tsf @ 36.7ft
2.0m
1.8m
2.0m
40
1.3m
81
60
2.0m
2.0m
2.0m
1.8m
45
1.8m
89
56
2.0m
2.2m
Qu = 349.36tsf @ 46.8ft
2.0m
2.0m
50
2.5m
60
93
1.8m
Advancement Method:
Notes:

Abandonment Method:
completion.

abbreviations.

800 Morrison Road
Columbus, Ohio
Drill Rig: Track
Driller: Bartlett
Exhibit:
A-3


New Hampton, NH
ELEVATION (Ft.)
SANDSTONE, fresh to moderately weathered,

moderately hard, close joints, thin to thick bedding, fair to
good RQD, tight to open, brown and gray, contains few
interbedded shales and argillaceous laminations, pyritic
(continued)
WATER
CONTENT (%)
RQD %
LABORATORY
TORVANE/HP (tsf)
DEPTH
FIELD TEST
RESULTS
RECOVERY (In.)
Latitude: 40.817117
SAMPLE TYPE
LOCATION I-71 HDD
WATER LEVEL
OBSERVATIONS
DEPTH (Ft.)
GRAPHIC LOG
SITE:
Page 3 of 3
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
LL-PL-PI
1.8m
60
2.5m
2.2m
55
1.8m
81
51
Qu = 384.22tsf @ 55.6ft
1.8m
2.2m
1.5m
1.3m
60
1.5m
55
60
1.8m
1.0m
2.0m
2.0m
65
2.0m
54
60
2.5m
Qu = 442.97tsf @ 66.4ft
1.8m
2.5m
2.0m
70
2.0m
94
60
2.0m
high angle near vertical fracture @ 71.3' - 72.2'
2.0m
2.0m
78
24
75.0
1239
Boring Terminated at 75 Feet
75
Advancement Method:
2.0m
Notes:

Abandonment Method:
completion.

abbreviations.

800 Morrison Road
Columbus, Ohio
Drill Rig: Track
Driller: Bartlett
Exhibit:
A-3
BORING LOG NO. D12-B


New Hampton, NH
1.5
16
2-3-3
N=6
1.0
(HP)
22
14
2-9-6
N=15
1.0
(HP)
20
18
4-5-10
N=15
15
14
4-5-7
N=12
16
14
12-12-26
N=38
16
50/1"
11
1306.5
RQD %
WATER
CONTENT (%)
ELEVATION (Ft.)
LEAN CLAY WITH SAND (CL), trace gravel, dark

brown to brown, medium stiff
LABORATORY
TORVANE/HP (tsf)
DEPTH
FIELD TEST
RESULTS
RECOVERY (In.)
Latitude: 40.818036
SAMPLE TYPE
LOCATION I-71 HDD
WATER LEVEL
OBSERVATIONS
DEPTH (Ft.)
GRAPHIC LOG
SITE:
Page 1 of 3
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
LL-PL-PI
LEAN CLAY WITH SAND (CL), trace gravel, brown to

orangish brown mottled gray, stiff
39-16-23
10.0
1298
SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, brown to

orangish brown mottled gray, stiff
15.0
1293
SANDSTONE, very severely to completely weathered,

brown to orangish brown, soft to very soft
10
26-16-10
15
20
25
Advancement Method:
Abandonment Method:
completion.
Notes:

Water was encountered at 23 feet

Grounwater sample was collected at 23 feet while drilling. Water
properties are 8.7F, pH 9.8, ORP 10mV

abbreviations.

800 Morrison Road
Columbus, Ohio
Drill Rig: Track
Driller: Bartlett
Exhibit:
A-4


New Hampton, NH
ELEVATION (Ft.)
WATER
CONTENT (%)
50/1"
RQD %
LABORATORY
TORVANE/HP (tsf)
DEPTH
FIELD TEST
RESULTS
RECOVERY (In.)
Latitude: 40.818036
SAMPLE TYPE
LOCATION I-71 HDD
WATER LEVEL
OBSERVATIONS
DEPTH (Ft.)
GRAPHIC LOG
SITE:
Page 2 of 3
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
LL-PL-PI
SANDSTONE, very severely to completely weathered,

brown to orangish brown, soft to very soft (continued)
28.5
1279.5
SANDSTONE, fresh to slightly weathered, moderately

hard, close joints, thick bedding fair to good RQD, tight to
moderately open, gray, contains few interbedded shales
and argillaceous laminations and calcareous clasts,
pyritic
30
2.0m
0.5m
73
32
0.5m
1.0m
1.3m
1.0m
1.3m
86
58
35
1.0m
1.3m
Qu = 587.31tsf @ 36.1ft
1.0m
2.0m
1.6m
90
57
40
1.5m
3.0m
2.0m
2.0m
2.0m
85
58
45
1.2m
1.8m
Qu = 432.57tsf @ 46.5ft
1.2m
1.3m
1.5m
86
60
50
1.2m
1.3m
Advancement Method:
Notes:

Abandonment Method:
completion.

abbreviations.

800 Morrison Road
Columbus, Ohio
Drill Rig: Track
Driller: Bartlett
Exhibit:
A-4


New Hampton, NH
ELEVATION (Ft.)
WATER
CONTENT (%)
RQD %
LABORATORY
TORVANE/HP (tsf)
DEPTH
FIELD TEST
RESULTS
RECOVERY (In.)
Latitude: 40.818036
SAMPLE TYPE
LOCATION I-71 HDD
WATER LEVEL
OBSERVATIONS
DEPTH (Ft.)
GRAPHIC LOG
SITE:
Page 3 of 3
ATTERBERG
LIMITS
LL-PL-PI
1.5m
SANDSTONE, fresh to slightly weathered, moderately

hard, close joints, thick bedding fair to good RQD, tight to
moderately open, gray, contains few interbedded shales
and argillaceous laminations and calcareous clasts,
pyritic (continued)
1.5m
1.2m
95
60
55
1.8m
2.0m
1.8m
2.0m
2.0m
Qu = 495.75tsf @ 59ft
93
60
60
1.3m
1.5m
2.0m
2.2m
1.5m
72
59
65
1.8m
1.5m
2.0m
2.0m
75
36
1.5m
70.0
Qu = 390.78tsf @ 69.5ft
Boring Terminated at 70 Feet
1238
70
Advancement Method:
Notes:

Abandonment Method:
completion.

abbreviations.

800 Morrison Road
Columbus, Ohio
Drill Rig: Track
Driller: Bartlett
Exhibit:
A-4
A-5
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY TESTING

Laboratory Testing
As a part of the laboratory testing program, the soil samples were classified in the laboratory based
on visual observation, and texture. The soil descriptions presented on the boring logs for native
soils are in accordance with our enclosed General Notes and Unified Soil Classification System
(USCS). A brief description of the Unified System is included in this report. Classification was
predominantly by visual manual procedures. Moisture content, grain size analysis, Atterberg limit,
and unconfined compressive strength tests were performed on selected samples. Chloride
corrosivity testing was also performed on groundwater sample. The results of this laboratory testing
are presented on the boring logs and laboratory data sheets included in Appendix B.
Exhibit B-1
#200
#140
#100
#60
#40
#30
#20
#10
#4
3/8 in.
in.
in.
1 in.
1 in.
2 in.
3 in.
6 in.
Particle Size Distribution Report

100
90
80
PERCENT FINER
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
10
0.1
0.01
0.001
GRAIN SIZE - mm.

% Gravel
Coarse
Fine
% +3"
0.0
2.6
Coarse
5.1
% Sand
Medium
6.7
SIEVE
PERCENT
SPEC.*
PASS?
SIZE
FINER
PERCENT
(X=NO)
1
100.0
3/4
97.4
1/2
94.2
3/8
94.2
#4
92.3
#10
85.6
#20
79.5
#40
75.1
#100
67.2
#200
60.3
0.0300 mm.
40.0
0.0197 mm.
33.2
0.0118 mm.
26.4
0.0085 mm.
22.3
0.0061 mm.
19.6
0.0036 mm.
15.5
* (no specification provided)
Source of Sample: D12-A
Sample Number: S-3
% Fines
10.5
Fine
Silt
Clay
14.8
42.2
18.1
Soil Description
Brown to dark brown SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace gravel
Atterberg Limits
LL= 25
PL= 15
D90= 3.4050
D50= 0.0464
D10=
Coefficients
D85= 1.8576
D30= 0.0155
C u=
USCS=
Classification
AASHTO=
CL
PI= 10
D60= 0.0739
D15=
Cc=
A-4(3)
Remarks
F.M.=1.31
Depth: 8.5'-10.0'
Date:
2/2/15
TERRACON
Client: Project Consulting Services, Inc.

Project: Proposed Rover ETC Pipeline Project - "MAIN LINE SEGMENT"
CONSULTANTS, INC.
Columbus, Ohio
Project No:
Tested By: DS
N4149328
Figure
Checked By: CG
Exhibit B-2
LIQUID AND PLASTIC LIMITS TEST REPORT

60
Dashed line indicates the approximate

upper limit boundary for natural soils
50
PLASTICITY INDEX
CH
or
OH
40
30
20
O
or
CL
10
CL-ML
ML or OL
MH or OH
4
7
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LIQUID LIMIT
70
80
90
100
110
27.8
27.4
27
WATER CONTENT
26.6
26.2
25.8
25.4
25
24.6
24.2
23.8
5
10
20
30
25
NUMBER OF BLOWS
40
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
LL
PL
PI
%<#40
%<#200
USCS
Brown to dark brown SANDY LEAN CLAY, trace gravel
25
15
10
75.1
60.3
CL
Project No.
Project:
N4149328
Proposed Rover ETC Pipeline Project - "MAIN LINE SEGMENT"

Sample Number: S-3
Remarks:
Date: 2/2/15
Depth: 8.5'-10.0'
TERRACON CONSULTANTS, INC.

Columbus, Ohio
Tested By: DS
Figure
Checked By: CG
Exhibit B-3
#200
#140
#100
#60
#40
#30
#20
#10
#4
3/8 in.
in.
in.
1 in.
1 in.
2 in.
3 in.
6 in.

100
90
80
PERCENT FINER
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
10
0.1
0.01
0.001
GRAIN SIZE - mm.

% Gravel
Coarse
Fine
% +3"
0.0
6.0
Coarse
12.4
% Sand
Medium
10.1
SIEVE
PERCENT
SPEC.*
PASS?
SIZE
FINER
PERCENT
(X=NO)
1
100.0
3/4
94.0
1/2
89.8
3/8
88.5
#4
81.6
#10
71.5
#20
66.5
#40
64.1
#100
59.6
#200
54.0
0.0295 mm.
34.7
0.0194 mm.
29.2
0.0116 mm.
23.6
0.0084 mm.
20.3
0.0060 mm.
18.1
0.0036 mm.
13.7
Sample Number: S-5
% Fines
7.4
Fine
Silt
Clay
10.1
37.2
16.8
Soil Description
Brownish-gray to gray SANDY LEAN CLAY with gravel
Atterberg Limits
LL= 23
PL= 14
D90= 13.2546
D50= 0.0602
D10=
Coefficients
D85= 6.3207
D30= 0.0209
C u=
USCS=
Classification
AASHTO=
CL
PI= 9
D60= 0.1620
D15= 0.0041
Cc=
A-4(2)
Remarks
F.M.=2.07
Depth: 18.5'-20.0'
Date:
2/2/15
TERRACON

CONSULTANTS, INC.
Columbus, Ohio
Project No:
Tested By: DS
N4149328
Figure
Checked By: CG
Exhibit B-4

60

50
PLASTICITY INDEX
CH
or
OH
40
30
20
O
or
CL
10
CL-ML
ML or OL
MH or OH
4
7
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LIQUID LIMIT
70
80
90
100
110
26
25.6
25.2
WATER CONTENT
24.8
24.4
24
23.6
23.2
22.8
22.4
22
5
10
20
30
25
NUMBER OF BLOWS
40
LL
PL
PI
%<#40
%<#200
USCS
Brownish-gray to gray SANDY LEAN CLAY with gravel
23
14
64.1
54.0
CL
Project No.
Project:
N4149328

Sample Number: S-5
Remarks:
Date: 2/2/15
Depth: 18.5'-20.0'

Columbus, Ohio
Tested By: DS
Figure
Checked By: CG
Exhibit B-5
#200
#140
#100
#60
#40
#30
#20
#10
#4
3/8 in.
in.
in.
1 in.
1 in.
2 in.
3 in.
6 in.

100
90
80
PERCENT FINER
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
10
0.1
0.01
0.001
GRAIN SIZE - mm.

% Gravel
Coarse
Fine
% +3"
0.0
0.0
Coarse
0.1
5.5
SIEVE
PERCENT
SPEC.*
PASS?
SIZE
FINER
PERCENT
(X=NO)
3/8
#4
#10
#20
#40
#100
#200
0.0265 mm.
0.0176 mm.
0.0107 mm.
0.0077 mm.
0.0056 mm.
0.0033 mm.
% Sand
Medium
100.0
99.9
94.4
93.3
92.0
86.1
80.4
63.9
56.6
47.7
43.3
38.9
33.0
% Fines
2.4
Fine
Silt
Clay
11.6
42.9
37.5
Soil Description
Brown to mottled orangish-brown and gray LEAN CLAY with
sand, trace gravel
Atterberg Limits
LL= 39
PL= 16
D90= 0.2784
D50= 0.0123
D10=
Coefficients
D85= 0.1274
D30=
C u=
USCS=
Classification
AASHTO=
CL
PI= 23
D60= 0.0212
D15=
Cc=
A-6(17)
Remarks
F.M.=0.42

Source of Sample: D12-B
Sample Number: S-2
Depth: 3.5'-5.0'
Date:
2/2/15
TERRACON

CONSULTANTS, INC.
Columbus, Ohio
Project No:
Tested By: DS
N4149328
Figure
Checked By: CG
Exhibit B-6

60

50
PLASTICITY INDEX
CH
or
OH
40
30
20
O
or
CL
10
CL-ML
ML or OL
MH or OH
4
7
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LIQUID LIMIT
70
80
90
100
110
42
41.5
41
WATER CONTENT
40.5
40
39.5
39
38.5
38
37.5
37
5
10
20
30
25
NUMBER OF BLOWS
40
LL
PL
PI
%<#40
%<#200
USCS
Brown to mottled orangish-brown and gray LEAN CLAY

with sand, trace gravel
39
16
23
92.0
80.4
CL
Project No.
Project:
N4149328

Sample Number: S-2
Remarks:
Date: 2/2/15
Depth: 3.5'-5.0'

Columbus, Ohio
Tested By: DS
Figure
Checked By: CG
Exhibit B-7
#200
#140
#100
#60
#40
#30
#20
#10
#4
3/8 in.
in.
in.
1 in.
1 in.
2 in.
3 in.
6 in.

100
90
80
PERCENT FINER
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
10
0.1
0.01
0.001
GRAIN SIZE - mm.

% Gravel
Coarse
Fine
% +3"
0.0
9.0
Coarse
2.6
% Sand
Medium
4.8
SIEVE
PERCENT
SPEC.*
PASS?
SIZE
FINER
PERCENT
(X=NO)
1-1/2
1
3/4
1/2
3/8
#4
#10
#20
#40
#100
#200
0.0290 mm.
0.0192 mm.
0.0115 mm.
0.0083 mm.
0.0060 mm.
0.0035 mm.
100.0
91.0
91.0
91.0
91.0
88.4
83.6
79.1
75.4
68.4
60.8
42.3
34.7
28.3
24.5
22.0
17.6
% Fines
8.2
Fine
Silt
Clay
14.6
40.2
20.6
Soil Description
Brown to mottled orangish-brown and gray SANDY LEAN CLAY,
trace gravel
Atterberg Limits
LL= 26
PL= 16
D90= 6.5508
D50= 0.0420
D10=
Coefficients
D85= 2.5949
D30= 0.0133
C u=
USCS=
Classification
AASHTO=
CL
PI= 10
D60= 0.0712
D15=
Cc=
A-4(3)
Remarks
F.M.=1.45

Sample Number: S-4
Depth: 13.5'-15.0'
Date:
2/2/15
TERRACON

CONSULTANTS, INC.
Columbus, Ohio
Project No:
Tested By: DS
N4149328
Figure
Checked By: CG
Exhibit B-8

60

50
PLASTICITY INDEX
CH
or
OH
40
30
20
O
or
CL
10
CL-ML
ML or OL
MH or OH
4
7
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
LIQUID LIMIT
70
80
90
100
110
28.6
28.2
27.8
WATER CONTENT
27.4
27
26.6
26.2
25.8
25.4
25
24.6
5
10
20
30
25
NUMBER OF BLOWS
40
LL
PL
PI
%<#40
%<#200
USCS
Brown to mottled orangish-brown and gray SANDY LEAN

CLAY, trace gravel
26
16
10
75.4
60.8
CL
Project No.
Project:
N4149328

Sample Number: S-4
Remarks:
Date: 2/2/15
Depth: 13.5'-15.0'

Columbus, Ohio
Tested By: DS
Figure
Checked By: CG
Exhibit B-9
Exhibit B-10
ETC Rover Pipeline Project

Terracon Project No: N4149328
Exhibit B-11
Exhibit B-12

Exhibit B-13
Exhibit B-14

Exhibit B-15
Exhibit B-16

Exhibit B-17
Exhibit B-18

Exhibit B-19
Exhibit B-20

Exhibit B-21
Exhibit B-22

Exhibit B-23
Exhibit B-24

Exhibit B-25
#=AR#
Pace Analytical Services, Inc.

Not NELAP Accredited
7726 Moller Road
4860 Blazer Parkway
Indianapolis, IN 46268
Dublin, OH 43017
(614)486-5421
(317)228-3100
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Project:
Rover Pipeline N4149238
Pace Project No.:
50111674
Sample: D12-B
Parameters
4500 Chloride
Chloride
Lab ID: 50111674001

Results
Units
Collected: 01/13/15 08:00

Report Limit
Received: 01/29/15 09:09
DF
Prepared
Analyzed
Matrix: Water
CAS No.
Qual
Analytical Method: SM 4500-Cl-E

143 mg/L
2.0
02/06/15 12:28 16887-00-6
REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS

This report shall not be reproduced, except in full,
Date: 02/09/2015 04:15 PM
without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc..
Exhibit B-26
#=QC#

7726 Moller Road
4860 Blazer Parkway
Dublin, OH 43017
(614)486-5421
(317)228-3100
QUALITY CONTROL DATA

Project:
Pace Project No.:
50111674
QC Batch:
WETA/14544
Analysis Method:
SM 4500-Cl-E
QC Batch Method:
SM 4500-Cl-E
Analysis Description:
4500 Chloride
Associated Lab Samples:
METHOD BLANK:
50111674001, 50111674002, 50111674003, 50111674004, 50111674005, 50111674006, 50111674007,

50111674008, 50111674009
1232952
Associated Lab Samples:
Parameter
Matrix: Water
50111674001, 50111674002, 50111674003, 50111674004, 50111674005, 50111674006, 50111674007,

50111674008, 50111674009
Blank
Reporting
Analyzed
Units
Result
Limit
Qualifiers
Chloride
mg/L
LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE:
1232953
Parameter
ND
Spike
Conc.
Units
Chloride
mg/L
Chloride
Units
50111932001
Result
mg/L
MATRIX SPIKE SAMPLE:
40.9
% Rec
Limits
106
Qualifiers
90-110
1232955
MS
Spike
Conc.
MSD
Spike
Conc.
20
20
MS
Result
61.1
MS
% Rec
MSD
Result
61.7
MSD
% Rec
101
104
% Rec
Limits
Max
RPD RPD
90-110
Qual
20
1232956
Parameter
Chloride
21.1
1232954
02/06/15 12:28
LCS
% Rec
LCS
Result
20
MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE:
Parameter
1.0
Units
mg/L
50111508001
Result
ND
Spike
Conc.
MS
% Rec
MS
Result
20
21.8
% Rec
Limits
107
Qualifiers
90-110
Results presented on this page are in the units indicated by the "Units" column except where an alternate unit is presented to the right of the result.

Date: 02/09/2015 04:15 PM
Exhibit B-27
#=QL#
7726 Moller Road
4860 Blazer Parkway
Dublin, OH 43017
(614)486-5421
(317)228-3100
QUALIFIERS
Project:
Pace Project No.:
50111674
DEFINITIONS
DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation, dilution of
the sample aliquot, or moisture content.
ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit.
J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit.
MDL - Adjusted Method Detection Limit.
PQL - Practical Quantitation Limit.
RL - Reporting Limit.
S - Surrogate
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine (8270 listed analyte) decomposes to Azobenzene.
Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values.
LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate)
MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate)
DUP - Sample Duplicate
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
NC - Not Calculable.
SG - Silica Gel - Clean-Up
U - Indicates the compound was analyzed for, but not detected.
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine decomposes and cannot be separated from Diphenylamine using Method 8270. The result reported for
each analyte is a combined concentration.
Pace Analytical is TNI accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes.
TNI - The NELAC Institute.

Date: 02/09/2015 04:15 PM
Exhibit B-28
APPENDIX C
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

Soil Classification
Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests
Coarse Grained Soils:

More than 50% retained
on No. 200 sieve
Gravels:
More than 50% of
coarse fraction retained
on No. 4 sieve
Sands:
50% or more of coarse
fraction passes No. 4
sieve
Silts and Clays:

Liquid limit less than 50
Fine-Grained Soils:
50% or more passes the
No. 200 sieve
Silts and Clays:
Liquid limit 50 or more
Highly organic soils:
A
B
Cc =
Well-graded gravel
GP
Poorly graded gravel F
GM
Silty gravel F,G,H
Fines classify as CL or CH
GC
Clayey gravel F,G,H
SW
Well-graded sand I
Sands with Fines:

More than 12% fines D
Inorganic:
Organic:
Inorganic:
Organic:
D10 x D 60
F
GW
Fines classify as ML or MH
Cu
4 and/or 1
6 and 1
Cc
Cc
If soil contains 15% sand, add with sand to group name.

If fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM, or SC-SM.
Cu 6 and/or 1 Cc 3
Fines classify as ML or MH
SP
Poorly graded sand I
SM
Silty sand G,H,I
Fines classify as CL or CH
SC
Clayey sand
CL
Lean clay
PI
7 and plots on or above A line
PI 4 or plots below A line

Liquid limit - oven dried
Liquid limit - not dried
ML
0.75
OL
Silt
K,L,M
Organic clay
Organic silt
Fat clay
PI plots below A line
MH
Elastic Silt
Liquid limit - not dried
0.75
OH
PT
K,L,M,N
K,L,M,O
K,L,M
CH
Liquid limit - oven dried
G,H,I
K,L,M
PI plots on or above A line
Primarily organic matter, dark in color, and organic odor
(D 30 )
Gravels with Fines:

C
More than 12% fines
Based on the material passing the 3-inch (75-mm) sieve

If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add with cobbles
or boulders, or both to group name.
Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well-graded
gravel with silt, GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay, GP-GM poorly
graded gravel with silt, GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay.
Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well-graded
sand with silt, SW-SC well-graded sand with clay, SP-SM poorly graded
sand with silt, SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay
Cu = D60/D10
3E
Group Name
Cu
Clean Sands:
D
Less than 5% fines
Cc
Group
Symbol
Clean Gravels:
C
Less than 5% fines
Cu
4 and 1
K,L,M
Organic clay
Organic silt
K,L,M,P
K,L,M,Q
Peat
If fines are organic, add with organic fines to group name.

If soil contains 15% gravel, add with gravel to group name.
J
If Atterberg limits plot in shaded area, soil is a CL-ML, silty clay.
K
If soil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 200, add with sand or with gravel,
whichever is predominant.
L
If soil contains 30% plus No. 200 predominantly sand, add sandy to
group name.
M
If soil contains 30% plus No. 200, predominantly gravel, add
gravelly to group name.
N
PI 4 and plots on or above A line.
O
PI 4 or plots below A line.
P
PI plots on or above A line.
Q
PI plots below A line.
I
Exhibit C-2
DESCRIPTION OF ROCK PROPERTIES

WEATHERING
Fresh
Very slight
Slight
Moderate
Moderately severe
Severe
Very severe
Complete
Rock fresh, crystals bright, few joints may show slight staining. Rock rings under hammer if crystalline.
Rock generally fresh, joints stained, some joints may show thin clay coatings, crystals in broken face show
bright. Rock rings under hammer if crystalline.
Rock generally fresh, joints stained, and discoloration extends into rock up to 1 in. Joints may contain clay. In
granitoid rocks some occasional feldspar crystals are dull and discolored. Crystalline rocks ring under hammer.
Significant portions of rock show discoloration and weathering effects. In granitoid rocks, most feldspars are dull
and discolored; some show clayey. Rock has dull sound under hammer and shows significant loss of strength
as compared with fresh rock.
All rock except quartz discolored or stained. In granitoid rocks, all feldspars dull and discolored and majority
show kaolinization. Rock shows severe loss of strength and can be excavated with geologists pick.
All rock except quartz discolored or stained. Rock fabric clear and evident, but reduced in strength to strong
soil. In granitoid rocks, all feldspars kaolinized to some extent. Some fragments of strong rock usually left.
All rock except quartz discolored or stained. Rock fabric discernible, but mass effectively reduced to soil with
only fragments of strong rock remaining.
Rock reduced to soil. Rock fabric not discernible or discernible only in small, scattered locations. Quartz may
be present as dikes or stringers.
HARDNESS (for engineering description of rock not to be confused with Mohs scale for minerals)
Very hard
Cannot be scratched with knife or sharp pick. Breaking of hand specimens requires several hard blows of
geologists pick.
Hard
Can be scratched with knife or pick only with difficulty. Hard blow of hammer required to detach hand specimen.
Moderately hard
Can be scratched with knife or pick. Gouges or grooves to in. deep can be excavated by hard blow of point of
a geologists pick. Hand specimens can be detached by moderate blow.
Medium
Can be grooved or gouged 1/16 in. deep by firm pressure on knife or pick point. Can be excavated in small
chips to pieces about 1-in. maximum size by hard blows of the point of a geologists pick.
Soft
Can be gouged or grooved readily with knife or pick point. Can be excavated in chips to pieces several inches in
size by moderate blows of a pick point. Small thin pieces can be broken by finger pressure.
Very soft
Can be carved with knife. Can be excavated readily with point of pick. Pieces 1-in. or more in thickness can be
broken with finger pressure. Can be scratched readily by fingernail.
Spacing
Less than 2 in.
2 in. 1 ft.
1 ft. 3 ft.
3 ft. 10 ft.
More than 10 ft.
Joint, Bedding, and Foliation Spacing in Rock

Joints
Very close
Close
Moderately close
Wide
Very wide
Bedding/Foliation
Very thin
Thin
Medium
Thick
Very thick
a. Spacing refers to the distance normal to the planes, of the described feature, which are parallel to each other or nearly so.
Rock Quality Designator (RQD) a

RQD, as a percentage
Diagnostic description
Exceeding 90
Excellent
90 75
Good
75 50
Fair
50 25
Poor
Less than 25
Very poor
a. RQD (given as a percentage) = length of core in pieces
Joint Openness Descriptors

Openness
Descriptor
No Visible Separation
Tight
Less than 1/32 in.
Slightly Open
1/32 to 1/8 in.
Moderately Open
1/8 to 3/8 in.
Open
3/8 in. to 0.1 ft.
Moderately Wide
Greater than 0.1 ft.
Wide
4 in. and longer/length of run.

References: American Society of Civil Engineers. Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice - No. 56. Subsurface Investigation for
Design and Construction of Foundations of Buildings. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1976. U.S.
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Engineering Geology Field Manual.
Exhibit C-3

Photograph 1:
Sample-1
Depth: 0-1.5 feet
Photograph 2:
Sample-2
Depth: 3.5-5.0 feet
Boring D12-A
Exhibit C-4

Photograph 3:
Sample-3
Depth: 8.5-10.0 feet
Photograph 4:
Sample-4
Boring D12-A
Exhibit C-4

Photograph 5:
Sample-5
Photograph 6:
Sample-R-6
Boring D12-A
Exhibit C-4

Photograph 7:
Sample-R-1, 2
Photograph 8:
Sample-R-3, 4
Boring D12-A
Exhibit C-4

Photograph 9:
Sample-R-5, 6
Photograph 10:
Sample-R-7, 8
Boring D12-A
Exhibit C-4

Photograph 11:
Sample-R-9, 10
Boring D12-A
Exhibit C-4

Photograph 1:
Sample-1
Depth: 0-1.5 feet
Photograph 2:
Sample-2
Depth: 3.5-5.0 feet
Boring D12-B
Exhibit C-4

Photograph 3:
Sample-3
Photograph 4:
Sample-4
Boring D12-B
Exhibit C-4

Photograph 5:
Sample-5
Photograph 6:
Sample-R-6
Boring D12-B
Exhibit C-4

Photograph 7:
Sample-R-1, 2
Photograph 8:
Sample-R-3, 4
Boring D12-B
Exhibit C-4

Photograph 9:
Sample-R-5, 6
Photograph 10:
Sample-R-7, 8
Boring D12-B
Exhibit C-4

Photograph 11:
Sample-R-9
Boring D12-B
Exhibit C-4

Example 1 - Geotechnical Data Report

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Example 1 - Geotechnical Data Report

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Geotechnical Data Report

Proposed I-71 HDD Cores D12-A and D12-B

March 27, 2015

Mr. Ronald P. Gourgeot, Jr., P.E.

Geotechnical Data Report

Dear Mr. Gourgeot:

Prasad S. Rege, P.E.

Terracon Consultants, Inc.

800 Morrison Road

Columbus, Ohio 43230

APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION

GEOTECHNICAL DATA REPORT

Current Ground Cover

The existing ground cover in the area of the proposed HDD

Based on provided survey information, the ground surface

Horizontally directionally drilled (HDD) natural gas pipeline

Responsive Resourceful Reliable

Geotechnical Data Report

Typical Subsurface Profile

Responsive Resourceful Reliable

Geotechnical Data Report

Water Level Observations

GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN PARAMETERS

Soil and Rock Parameters

Total Unit Weight

Medium stiff cohesive soils

Stiff to very stiff cohesive soils

Total Unit Weight of

Moderately hard (sandstone)

Responsive Resourceful Reliable

Geotechnical Data Report

Responsive Resourceful Reliable

Responsive Resourceful Reliable

Geotechnical Data Report

Field Exploration Description

Responsive Resourceful Reliable

PH. (614) 863-3113

Columbus, Ohio 43230

TEST BORING LOCATION PLAN

I-71 HDD Cores D12-A and D12-B

BORING LOG NO. D12-A

CLIENT: Project Consulting Services, Inc.

SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, dark brown,

Penetration Per foot

Surface Elev.: 1314 (Ft.)

LOCATION I-71 HDD

Mainline Segment (various locations in OH)

SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, brown to dark

SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, brown to dark

SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, brown to dark

SANDY LEAN CLAY WITH GRAVEL (CL),

SANDSTONE, completely weathered, orangish-brown

Hammer Type: Automatic

See Exhibit A-1 for description of field procedures

See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and

WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS

Boring Started: 1/16/2015

Boring Completed: 1/16/2015

Drill Rig: Track

Project No.: N4149328

BORING LOG NO. D12-A

CLIENT: Project Consulting Services, Inc.

Penetration Per foot