Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
a
Dipartimento di Chimica Organica U. Schiff, via della Lastruccia 13, I-50019 Sesto F.no (Firenze), Italy
Dipartimento di Chimica Farmaceutica e Tossicologica, Universita` Federico II, via Montesano 49, I-80131 Napoli, Italy
c
Dipartimento di Scienze Farmaceutiche, via Marzolo 5, I-35131 Padova, Italy
AbstractA convenient route to new 3(2H)-furanones is described through hydrogenolysis and subsequent acidic hydrolysis of isoxazoles.
The antiproliferative activity of title compounds were evaluated against leukemia-, carcinoma-, neuroblastoma-, and sarcoma-derived human
cell lines in comparison to the natural compound geiparvarin. The structure activity relationship indicated that the maximum in vitro
antiproliferative activity correlates with the presence of a heterocyclic ring on the ethenyl moiety. q 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights
reserved.
1. Introduction
In the last years, increasing attention has been devoted to the
study of 3(2H)-furanones that were found to be present in a
number of natural antitumoral agents such as geiparvarin,
jatrophone, eremantholides and chinolone.1 The ability of
these compounds to act as alkylating agents by means of
conjugate addition (Michael acceptors) seems to be related
to their biological activity.1 The same literature revealed
that model synthetic derivatives such as 2,2-dimethyl-5isopropenyl-3(2H)-furanone have been shown to exhibit
significant in vitro activity. Our initial investigations in this
field were directed towards the synthesis of geiparvarin
analogues containing the pharmacophore 3(2H)-furanone
ring system;2,3 strong antiproliferative activity compounds
and selective MAO-B inhibitors have been obtained by
substitution of the methyl group on the allyloxy bridge of
geiparvarin with an hydrogen atom (Fig. 1A). With the aim
Figure 1.
Keywords: 3(2H)-furanones; ethenyl-3(2H)-furanones; antitumoral
compounds.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: 39-554573537; fax: 39-554573568;
e-mail: stefano.chimichi@unifi.it
Scheme 1.
00404020/03/$ - see front matter q 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(03)00776-2
5216
Scheme 2.
Scheme 3.
Route
Yield (%)
5a R1R3H, R2Me
5a R1R3H, R2Me
5b R1R3H, R2Ph
5c R1R2Me, R3H
5d R1Me, R2Ph, R3H
5e R1Me, R2p-F-Ph, R3H
5f R1H, R2R3Me
5f R1H, R2R3Me
5g R1R2R3Me
5h R1R3Me, R2Ph
A or B
C
A or B
A or B
A or B
C
A or B
C
A or B
A or B
4249
52
5862
4050
5674
53
5052
51
55
5255
Scheme 4.
Scheme 5.
5217
Scheme 7.
Scheme 6.
Recently, we investigated the reaction between 3(2H)furanones and cumarinyloxyaldehydes that provided a new
entry to geiparvarin analogues.3 We wish now to point out
that this procedure can be applied only to furanones having
R2 not equal to H (Scheme 6). Thus, for compounds 6c,d,g,h
the procedure can be conveniently extended to the synthesis
of 2,2-disubstituted-5-alkenyl-3(2H)-furanones 8 by reaction with formaldehyde and subsequent dehydration of the
intermediate alcohols 7 in nearly quantitative yields
($95%). This procedure can be considered to be a more
convenient and general alternative to that one reported by
Smith1 for 8c and 8g.
After proving the formation of the carbanion on the
g-carbon of furanones in absence of an hydrogen atom at
position 2, we turned our attention to the extension of such a
reaction to the synthesis of new ethenyl substituted
furanones, employing aromatic and heteroaromatic aldehydes. Thus, following the procedure reported by Felman
et al.,8 the new derivatives 9 20 have been synthesized
(Scheme 7).
We wish to point out here that the applied procedure is
remarkably efficient from the stereoselectivity point of
view: the E-diastereoisomer being the unique product for all
the obtained compounds 9 20. Stereochemical assignment
was achieved on the basis of H-10 /H-20 coupling constant
values (,16 Hz) from the 1H NMR spectra. To this end,
unambiguous assignment of H-10 and H-20 resonances is
however compulsory. This attribution was reached by 13C
NMR experiments as follows. Apart from chemical shifts
consideration on C-20 and C-10 (e.g. signal at 139.0 and
116.1 ppm in compound 12), C-20 resonances are easily
assigned on the basis of fully coupled C H spectra. The
high-frequency signal always appears as a doublet of triplets
5218
Compounds
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Geiparvarin
a
b
K562
HL-60
HT-1080
A549
SHSY5Y
17.4^1.4
n.d
7.7^0.3
.40
24.0^1.6
21.5^3.1
n.d.
5.2^0.2
17.5^1.2
25.1^2.4
5.1^0.25
2.9^0.1
9.2^0.5
.40
.40
10.9^0.6
20.1^1.8
15.7^1.4
26.3^4.4
.40
8.6^0.4
21.7^1.6
24.5^1.3
6.3^0.7
7.2^1.3
6.3^0.6
34.0^2.3
.40
17.0^1.8
.40
.40
25.5^3.0
23.0^2.5
8.6^0.3
.40
.40
12.8^2.4
10.7^2.4
9.8^0.9
n.d.
.40
.40
.40
.40
n.d.
n.d.
n.d.
.40
.40
15.4^1.2
12.6^1.1
11.5^2.8
33.4^1.3
36.8^1.4
16.1^3.9
.40
40.4^0.7
.40
30.4^3.8
7.3^0.6
.40
.40
9.5^0.9
7.8^0.5
5.7^1.6
Compounds
CEM
11
16
19
20
Geiparvarin
a
3.2^0.3
2.1^0.1
1.8^0.6
2.4^0.4
1.8^0.1
CEM/Vbl100
1.5^0.2
0.9^0.1
0.5^0.2
0.2^0.07
4.8^0.7
LoVo
18.9^1.6
14.0^1.3
6.0^1.0
6.6^2.7
9.2^1.3
LoVo/Doxo
4.7^0.4
2.4^0.4
3.4^0.2
3.7^0.5
5.6^0.6
4. Experimental
4.1. General
Melting points were measured using a Buchi apparatus and
are uncorrected. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on
a Varian Gemini 200 (operating at 50.29 MHz for 13C) and
on Varian Gemini 300 (operating at 75.43 MHz for 13C)
instruments in the Fourier transform mode at 21^0.58C in
CDCl3. Chemical shifts (d) are in ppm relative to TMS as
secondary internal reference standard; coupling constants
are in Hz. Attributions of 13C NMR resonances were
performed on the basis of gated decoupled or DEPT
experiments. Mass spectra were registered with a Carlo
Erba QMD 1000 instrument at 70 eV. IR spectra were
recorded with a Perkin Elmer 881 spectrophotometer.
Elemental analyses were obtained by Elemental Analyzer
Perkin Elmer 240C apparatus. Silica gel plates (Merck
F254) and silica gel 60 (Merck 230 400 mesh) were used for
analytical TLC and for flash chromatography, respectively.
Solvents were removed under reduced pressure. g-Manganese dioxide and lithium diisopropylamide, 2.0 M solution
in heptane/tetrahydrofuran/ethylbenzene, were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich.
4.1.1. 1-(3-Ethyl-5-isoxazolyl)-1-ethanone 4 (R35Me).
Method C. A solution of nitropropane 2 (8.6 g, 95 mmol)
and triethylamine (20 drops) in dry benzene (20 mL) was
added dropwise to a solution of phenyl isocyanate (20.7 g,
174 mmol) and 3-buten-2-one (6.7 g, 95 mmol) in dry
benzene (35 mL). After stirring for 1 h, the reaction mixture
was refluxed for an additional hour, cooled and checked.
The solid was filtered off, and the filtrate was concentrated
to give a yellow oil which was distilled to afford pure 1-(3ethyl-4,5-dihydro-5-isoxazolyl)-1-ethanone (3 RMe)
(78%); 55 568C/0.078 mm Hg [lit.11 104 1068C/10 Torr].
Compound 3 (2.2 g, 15.7 mmol) in dry benzene (50 mL)
and active g-manganese dioxide (5.0 g) were refluxed for
3 h, while the water formed was removed by means of a
Dean Stark trap. The end of the reaction was monitored by
1
H NMR. The solid was filtered through Celite and washed
with the same solvent. Evaporation of the filtrate left a
compound which was purified by flash-chromatography
(ethyl acetate/petroleum ether1:3, v/v as eluant, yield
76%) and identified as the corresponding 1-(3-ethyl-5isoxazolyl)-1-ethanone (4) identical to the product obtained
by Tamariz et al.12
4.2. General procedure for the preparation of
isoxazolylalcohols 5a d,f h
Method A. A solution of POCl3 (3.93 mL, 42.2 mmol) in
5219
5220
NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.47 7.33 (m, 5H, Ar), 5.41 (d,
1H, 4J0.7 Hz, H-4), 2.35 (d, 3H, 4J0.7 Hz, 5-CH3), 1.74
(s, 3H, 2-CH3); 13C NMR (75.43 MHz, CDCl3): 204.8 (s,
C-3), 188.5 (s, C-5), 138.1 (s, C-10 ), 128.5 (d, C-20 , C-60 ),
128.0 (d, C-40 ), 124.5 (d, C-30 , C-50 ), 102.2 (d, C-4), 90.4 (s,
C-2), 24.3 (q, 2-CH3), 17.0 (q, 5-CH3); EI-MS m/z (%) 188
(M, 67), 105 (49), 104 (38), 77 (68), 68 (46), 51 (38), 43
(85), 40 (100).
4.3.5. 2,5-Dimethyl-2-(4-fluoro)phenyl-3(2H)-furanone
6e. Colourless oil (63%);8 bp 78 808C/0.07 mm Hg; IR
(neat) 2982, 2933, 1702 (CvO), 1604, 1228, 834 cm21; 1H
NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) d 7.51 7.43 (m, 2H, Ar), 7.08
6.99 (m, 2H, Ar), 5.41 (d, 1H, 4J0.7 Hz, H-4), 2.34 (d, 3H,
4
J0.7 Hz, 5-CH3), 1.72 (s, 3H, 2-CH3); 13C NMR
(75.43 MHz, CDCl3) d 204.5 (s, C-3), 188.6 (s, C-5),
162.3 (d, C-40 ), 133.8 (d, C-10 ), 126.3 (dd, C-20 , C-60 ), 115.2
(dd, C-30 , C-50 ), 102.0 (d, C-4), 89.7 (s, C-2), 24.3 (q,
2-CH3), 16.7 (q, 5-CH3); EI-MS m/z (%) 206 (M, 70), 123
(54), 122 (62), 95 (67), 68 (100), 43 (63), 39 (66).
4.3.6. 5-Ethyl-2-methyl-3(2H)-furanone 6f. Yield: 88%;
bp 64 668C/15 mm Hg [lit.14 66 688C/15 Torr]; IR (neat)
1697 (CvO), 1591 cm21. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d
5.41 (br s, H-4), 4.47 (qdd, 1H, 3J7.0 Hz, 5J4J1.0 Hz,
H-2), 2.49 (m, 2H, 3J7.5 Hz, 4J0.7 Hz, 5J1.0 Hz, H-1a0
and H-1b0 ), 1.42 (dd, 3H, 3J7.0 Hz, 2-CH3), 1.21 (dd, 3H,
3
J7.5 Hz, CH2CH3); 13C NMR (75.43 MHz, CDCl3) d
205.7 (s, C-3), 195.0 (s, C-5), 101.8 (d, C-4), 82.5 (d, C-2),
24.2 (t, CH2), 16.3 (q, 2-CH3), 10.2 (q, CH3); EI-MS m/z
(%) 126 (M, 45), 97 (2), 82 (23), 81 (20), 54 (100).
4.3.7. 2,2-Dimethyl-5-ethyl-3(2H)-furanone 6g. Yield:
72%;2 bp 48 508C/0.07 mm Hg; IR (neat) 1700 (CvO),
1591 cm21; 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) d 5.33 (t, 1H,
4
J0.8 Hz, H-4), 2.48 (qd, 2H, 3J7.6 Hz, 4J0.8 Hz,
CH2CH3), 1.35 (s, 6H, 22-CH3), 1.20 (t, 3H, 3J7.6 Hz,
CH2CH3); 13C NMR (75.43 MHz, CDCl3) d 207.5 (s, C-3),
193.0 (s, C-5), 100.1 (d, C-4), 88.5 (s, C-2), 24.2 (t,
CH2CH3), 22.8 (q, 22-CH3), 10.2 (q, CH2CH3); EI-MS m/z
(%) 140 (M, 58), 82 (38), 81 (43), 54 (100).
4.3.8. 5-Ethyl-2-methyl-2-phenyl-3(2H)-furanone 6h.
Yield: 80%; bp 87 888C/0.02 mm Hg; IR (neat) 3063,
2979, 1705 (CO), 1600 cm21; 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3)
d 7.49 7.39 (m, 5H, Ar), 5.39 (dd, 1H, 4J0.8 Hz, H-4),
2.61 (qd, 2H, 3J8.0 Hz, 4J0.8 Hz, H-10 a and H-10 b), 1.17
(s, 3H, 2-CH3), 1.29 (dd, 3H, 3J8.0 Hz, CH2CH3); 13C
NMR (75.43 MHz, CDCl3) d 204.6 (s, C-3), 193.6 (s, C-5),
138.3 (s, C-10 ), 128.4 (d, C-20 , C-60 ), 128.2 (d, C-40 ), 124.5
(d, C-30 , C-50 ), 100.3 (d, C-4), 89.9 (s, C-2), 24.3 (q, 2-CH3),
24.1 (t, CH2CH3), 10.2 (q, CH2CH3); EI-MS m/z (%) 202
(28, M), 187 (3), 173 (7), 105 (60), 77 (83), 54 (100). Anal.
calcd for C13H14O2: C, 72.20; H, 6.98. Found: C, 77.21; H,
6.99.
4.4. General procedure for the synthesis of 3(2H)furanones 8c,d,g,h
A 2.0 M lithium diisopropylamide (LDA) solution in
heptane/tetrahydrofuran/ethylbenzene (0.75 mL) was
added under nitrogen to a solution of the furanone 6
(1.5 mmol) in dry tetrahydrofuran (10 mL) at 2788C. The
5221
J1.5, 0.8 Hz, 10 -CH3), 1.76 (s, 3H, 2-CH3); 13C NMR
(75.43 MHz, CDCl3) d 204.9 (s, C-3), 183.7 (s, C-5), 138.5
(s, C-100 ), 133.6 (s, C-10 ), 128.5 (d, C-200 , C-600 ), 128.0 (d,
C-400 ), 124.5 (d, C-300 , C-500 ), 121.6 (t, C-20 ), 100.2 (d, C-4),
90.0 (s, C-2), 24.4 (q, 2-CH3), 18.9 (q, 10 -CH3); EI-MS m/z
(%) 214 (M, 16), 199 (2), 186 (4), 171 (4), 105 (20), 77
(28), 66 (100). Anal. calcd for C14H14O2: C, 78.48; H, 6.59.
Found: C, 78,51; H, 7.00.
4
5222
5223
References
1. Smith, A. B., III.; Levenberg, P. A.; Jerris, P. J.; Scarborough,
R. M.; Wovkulich, P. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103,
1501 1513.
2. Chimichi, S.; Boccalini, M.; Cosimelli, B.; Viola, G.; Vedaldi,
D.; DallAcqua, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7473 7476.
3. Carotti, A.; Carrieri, A.; Chimichi, S.; Boccalini, M.;
Cosimelli, B.; Gnerre, C.; Carotti, A.; Carrupt, P. A.; Testa,
B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002, 12, 3551 3555.
4. Jerris, P. J.; Smith, A. B., III. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46,
577 585.
5. Mukaiyama, T.; Hoshino, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82,
5339 5342.
6. Chimichi, S.; Cosimelli, B. Synth. Commun. 1992, 22,
2909 2920.
7. Grunanger, P.; Vita-Finzi, P. In Isoxazoles, Part One. The
Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds; Taylor, E. C., Ed.;
Interscience/Wiley: New York, 1991; Vol. 49.
8. Felman, S. W.; Jirkovsky, I.; Borella, L.; Wells, C.; Russell, J.;
Ward, J. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 1183 1190.
9. Schaefer, T.; Peeling, J.; Penner, G. H.; Lemire, A.; Sebastian,
R. Can. J. Chem. 1985, 63, 24 29.
10. Grandi, M.; Geroni, C.; Giuliani, F. C. Br. J. Cancer 1986, 54,
515 518.
11. Sharma, S. C.; Torsell, K. Acta Chem. Scand. Ser. B 1979, 33,
379 380.
12. Herrera, R.; Nagarajan, A.; Morales, M. A.; Mendez, F.;
Jimenez-Vazquez, H. A.; Zepeda, L. G.; Tamariz, J. J. Org.
Chem. 2001, 66, 1252 1263.
13. Musante, C. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1941, 71, 172 182.
14. Anderesen, S. H.; Das, N. B.; Joergensen, R. D.; Kjeldsen, G.;
Knudsen, J. S. Acta Chem. Scand. Ser. B 1982, 36, 1 14.
15. Mosmann, T. J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 65, 55 63.