Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Traveling Identities
Author(s): Jeannette Marie Mageo
Source: Ethos, Vol. 34, No. 4 (Dec., 2006), pp. 456-487
Published by: Wiley on behalf of the American Anthropological Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4129778 .
Accessed: 23/07/2014 04:13
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Wiley and American Anthropological Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and
extend access to Ethos.
http://www.jstor.org
456
ETHOS
ETHOS,Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 456-487, ISSN 0091-2131, electronicISSN 1548-1352. ? 2006 by the
AmericanAnthropologicalAssociation. All rightsreserved. Please directall requestsfor permissionto photocopy
or reproducearticlecontentthroughthe Universityof CaliforniaPress'sRightsand Permissionswebsite,
http://www.ucpress.edu/journals/rights. htm.
FIGURATIVE
ANALYSISAND TRAVELING
IDENTITIES457
means to be a person-that is, about identity-fit together into "culturalselfmodels."' Here I use self as a domain term that encompasses all aspects of
personhood and subjectivity.
Previously,1 (1995, 1998, 2002b) have exploredculturalself-models in discourse.
What I am proposinghere is, first,that we also hold sharedself-models in figurative form-that is, through figures associatedin cultural experience with these
models. Here byfigure I refer to images (e.g., a car), along with affiliatedthemes
which may have symbolicsignificancein the culture.Second,
(such as "traveling"),
when such figures occur in the manifest content of dreams, they continue to
represent self-models. Third, dreams' depiction/development of self-models is
clearestin dreamcollections.Dream collections,figurativelyunderstood,offer the
"nightlynews"of culture-potentially revealinghow rangesof people subjectively
experiencea model. And, fourth,by capturingthis rangeof experience,dreamcollections disclose the dynamic tensions inherent in a current self-model and its
directionsof change.
Anthropologists have long collected dreams but commonly prefer either to
document dreambeliefs and practicesor to adopt a person-centeredapproachin
which they drawlargerculturalimplicationsfrom analyzingthe corpus of dreams
by a single individualor a small number of individuals.2In recent decades, they
have been reluctantto explorehow culturalpsychology is reflectedby dreamcollections sampled across a group. In the field of psychology, however, Hall and
Van de Castle's (1966) content analysis measures comparative emotional and
behavioralfeaturesof groups through dreamcollections. Hall and Van de Castle
were inspiredby Eggan's(1952) call to consider the manifest content of dreams.
In content analysis,the analystscoresa set of dreamson 19 preestablishedscales16 empirical scales and three theoretical scales, the latter borrowed from
psychoanalysis.The assumptionis that these scales correspondto universalvariables. Anticipatingselective correlationsbetween groups and the variationsthey
observedin dreamcontent, Hall andVan de Castle (1966) took the frequencyof a
dreamelement to indicatethe extent of an individual'spreoccupationwith related
materialin wakinglife and collected dataon "types"of individualsbasedon factors
such as age, gender, and culture.Van de Castle (1983) was also interestedin the
symbolic nature of dream content and conducted a major study of dreamswith
animal figures. The form of analysisI propose here-"figurative analysis"-also
looks at recurrentfiguresbut enlists an anthropologicalapproach.
458 ETHOS
Culturalanthropologists
since Geertzhave favoredletting analyticcategories
from
emerge
ethnographicdata,althoughGeertz(1984)himselfbelievedthat
certaincategoriessuchas "person"
havecomparative
validity.A figurativeanalysis focuseson the manifestcontentof dreamsbut allowssignificantelementsto
contextrather
emergefroma set of dreamaccountscollectedin anethnographic
thanprecedingit. The presumptionhereis thatdreamanalysisneedsto begin
with culturallyspecific interpretiveframeworks.An ethnographerrecords
dreamsin the processof investigatingandparticipating
in a culture,reviewing
the resultingcollectionformajorfigures.Figuresaremajorif (1) theyoccurin a
significantpercentageof the dreamsin the collection;(2) they are salientin
diverseculturalmaterial-popularentertainment,
commerce,andso forth;and
to whichthesedreamfigures
(3) culturememberstreatthe objectsor characters
refer in wakinglife as psychologicallymeaningful-as targetsof emotions,
desires,andneeds.
Working from the hypothesis that dreams depict/developself-models, a
researcherusing figurativeanalysisaskswhetheran emergentfigureis used
in an ambiguousselfambiguouslyby subjectsand,if so, how it mayparticipate
modelin the culture-one withcontradictory
features.Takingambiguityasa sign
that a sharedself-modelis in historicalprocess,figurativeanalysisdirectsthe
researcherto furtherinterrogatethe dreamfigureat issue and the model it
Forinsights,onedrawson largerstudiesof thedreamers'
cularguably
represents.
tureandits history,alongwithoralandwrittenliteratures,
mythology,song,and
otherpopulartextsin whichthe dreamfigureandcloselyrelatedfiguresappear.
All the dreamswithina collectionin whichanemergentfigureplaysa majorrole
composea relevantsubset.One reviewsthis subsetto detectaffiliatedthemes.
Numerous studies indicatethat recurrentdream themes illustratecultural
schemas(Ewing2003; Hollan 2003;Mageo 2002a, 2003:3-42;Shulmanand
Stroumsa1999;Stephen2003).In figurative
analysis,theresearcher
goesfurther,
how
the
subset's
themes
illustrateschemasrelevantto the selfasking
specifically
modelunderinvestigation.
Last,one zoomsin on individualdreamsthatfeature
these themes,nestinga person-centered
approachwithina broaderanalysisof
otherdreams.Workingwith dreamersto interpretthismaterial,the researcher
exploreshow thesedreamstransformthe figurethatdefinesthe set alongwith
the affiliatedthemes discoveredin subset analysis.These transformationsopen a
window on identity constructionwithin a specific cultural-historicalworld.
FIGURTIVEANALYSISAND TRAVELING
IDENTITIES459
Car Tropes
When I began leafingthroughmy collectionof U.S. undergraduate
dream
accounts,carsemergedas a majorfigure.The frequencyof carsin U.S. dreams
is no surprise.Carsarenecessaryto U.S. lifeways,andadvertisements
attestthey
areobjectsof emotions,needs,anddesires.Basedon his psychoanalytic
workin
Los Angeles,Hollan saysthe caris also a "highlysalientsymbolof the self in
North Americanculture."Cars are "usedby people to expresstheir status
theirsenseof fashion,theirsexuality,
theirwishforfreedom,mobility,
aspirations,
andautonomy,andso on. The identificationbetweenselfandautois promoted
by hugeadvertisingbudgets,andis reinforceddayin anddayout by the amount
of time most North Americansspendin theircars"(Hollan2003:70).It is not
unexpectedthen, that a collectionof dreamaccountsfrom studentsin the
UnitedStatesincludescarsasa significantfigure.This figure,moreover,should
cast light on the currentstate of one importantself-modeland its affiliated
schemas,alongwithyoungpeople'sreactionsto thismodel.
The caris a keydreamsymbolin the UnitedStatesbecausethe United Statesis
a "travelingculture,"to invoke Clifford's(1992:101-103)famousessay and
analysisof modernculturesas characterized
by sitestraversed.Surelytraveling
culturesmust correspondto kindsof subjectivitiesand to certainsharedselfmodels. Self as a mode of transit?Undoubtedlythere is a diversearrayof
traveling cultures and self-models that go with them-from nomadic cultures
to diasporic ones.
460
ETHOS
FIGURATIVE
ANALYSISAND TRAVELING
IDENTITIES461
United States, where does this leave women? What do the male roots of this
self-model mean about women's transits and their citizenship in a traveling
culture?
Here Allison's(2001) work on toys offers a point of departure.Allison arguesthat
toy manufacturers-via movies, video games, and action figures-merchandise
subjectivity along Fordist lines of marketing strategies and assembly-line
efficiency.What is autonomy in a Fordist world?Is it a choice among consumer
items, a la Baudrillard(1988), where a system of objects directsdesirevia an overriding hedonistic ethic-"Fulfill yourself' by buying the latest product?
Toys, Allison believes, are about more than simple hedonism: they are fetishes
in the psychoanalyticsense. The fetish is a stand-in, as in the famous "Fort/Da
game" (Freud 1922). Whenever his mother went out, Freud'slittle nephew cast
and then reeled in a spool of thread as he chanted "Fort"(gone) and then "Da"
(here). The game assuaged the child's anxiety about loss through ritualistic
mastery of his mother's transits, her absence/presence. The fetish stand-in,
Allison reminds us, acquiresadditionalmeanings at the Oedipus crisis. Fetishes
also assuage the shock boys feel at the discovery that when it comes to gender
there are haves and have-nots and at their inference that, if have-nots exist, they
could lose their penises. Fetishes do so by standing in for the lost penis, which
boys imagine women once had. Thus, the fetish represents boys' ambivalence
about gender difference through a stand-in that assertsmale gender.
Allison traces the development of toys/fetishes and their affiliated stories from
Superman in the 1950s to the cyborg heroes in the 1990s, which originated in
Japan and became popular among U.S. kids. With Superman,"phallicismcame
in and on his body, but with cyborg heroes it is displaced onto removable or
detachable things-robots, belts, wands, guns. ... Today'sheroes have powers
that reach beyond the body and materialize into tools or machines that could
and are operated by more than just men-women and bugs" (Allison
2001:87-88). Why do girls want to play with toys that assert male gender?
Feminist psychoanalysts have long seen phallic symbolism in sociopolitical
terms, positing that men's privileges are first represented by bodily difference.
Adult toys, too, may be fetishes through which both sexes try to ritualistically
master the anxious politics of gendered bodies. Is the car then a Lacanian
phallus-a detachable symbol of masculine identity and privilege that men can
lose and women can appropriate?As the Beach Boys' song goes, "She'll have
462 ETHOS
Car Dreams
We havehit on an ambiguityin a self-modelthatone mightcall"genderedyet
the carself-model,despiteits phallicnature,hasslippedits moorungendered":
in
ings biologicalgender.Again,ambiguityin a self-modelsignifiesthatit is in
historicalprocess.My dataofferwhat I am temptedto call a regionalreport
aboutcontemporarytransformations
of the carself-model.But how does one
speakof regionsin a travelingculture-as siteson a pilgrimageas Cliffordasks
at the conclusionto his essay?Cliffordwrites:
I hangonto"travel"
asa termof culturalcomparison,
preciselybecauseof
its historicaltaintedness,
its association
withgendered,racialbodies,class
beatenpaths,agents,frontiers...
privilege,specificmeansof conveyance,
and the like. I preferit to more apparently
neutral,and "theoretical,"
whichcanmakethe drawingof equivaterms,suchas "displacement,"
lencesacrossdifferenthistoricalexperiences
too easy.... AndI preferit to
termssuchas"nomadism,"
oftengeneralized
withoutapparent
resistance
fromnon-Western
...
...
includes
a
broad
experience. "Pilgrimage"
range
of Westernandnon-Westernexperienceand is less classand genderbiasedthan"travel."
[1992:110]
U.S. universitiesare visitationson careerpaths;studentsfrom an aleatory
rangeof locationstry to makecommunitiesand enduringfriendshipsthere.I
collecteddreamaccountsspringandfallsemesters2004 in two classeson culture and the self at WashingtonState University(WSU). At that time, the
WSU undergraduate
fifteenthousand
populationconsistedof approximately
studentsfrom Washingtoncounties,approximately
fifteenhundredstudents
fromotherstatesmostlyin the West,a fewpeoplefromU.S. territories,several
hundredfrom other countriespredominatelyin Asia, and a roughly equal
numberof malesandfemales.
Crapanzano(2003) stresses that dream accounts alwaysoccur in cultural
context-a contextthatshapestheirnatureandrelationto the experienceof the
dream.Besidesbeinga university
classin thenorthwestern
UnitedStates,thecontext of these accountsis the cultureof what Giddens(1991) calls"highmodernity."
In high modernity, the self becomes a reflexive project "which consists in the
ANALYSISAND TRAVELING
IDENTITIES463
FIGURATIVE
464 ETHOS
IDENTITIES465
FIGURATIVE
ANALYSISAND TRAVELING
his car;he too becomes frantic, then angry,and rolls down a hill as a ball. None
of my male dreamers steal cars in dreams, but one is the victim of a theft. In
one woman's dream, the dreamerand her friend steal a car,but then it turns out
only the friend has stolen it. In another, a woman steals a car along with a
friend who is driving but who keeps getting depressed and slowing down. The
dreamer takes the wheel, but the car will not go.
In male dream accounts, cars are associatedwith aggression:they may transport
murderers,be weapons, or be symbolicallyreplacedby weapons. Male dreamers
tend to identify with cars: a dreamer referred to the speed the car goes, for
example, as the "speed I am going." This phraseology did not occur in female
dream accounts. Males did not see their conscious personalityas symbolized by
a car, but one did act the role of the car in "dreamplay" (an analytic method
describedbelow). In another analysis,a woman chose to role-play the road.
Car Self-Models
If the car is a trope for the self as free, mobile, and autonomous-a figurative
model with lots of affiliated schemas alluded to by dream themes-in my data,
this trope signifies different problems for the two genders. Male identity is
troubled by female autonomy, as represented by women driving, holding
authority roles such as teacher, not needing or wanting rescuing, and so forth.
This trouble seems to undermine male dreamers'sense of themselves as heroic;
heroic identity seems more assumable for women. Yet male dreamers retained
the auto accessories of heroism, supercars,which females did not dream about.
Women dreamerswere more willing to appropriateautonomy through car theft
and to feel guilt and fear about appropriation,but they were also more willing to
accept autonomy loss in the form of car loss. This accepting attitude together
with the phraseology "we drove" indicates porous boundaries rather than
"sacred"boundaries,as Hollan suggests. I doubt that these women confine this
phraseology to dream accounts. I am reminded here of my fieldworkin Samoa.
After a drive there, a passenger politely remarks,"Thanks for driving"and the
driverresponds, "Thanksfor your support,"as if drivingwere a joint enterprise.
In riposte to theorists such as Gilligan (1982), who distinguishes moral orientations between males and females in the United States, Kondo points out that
Western women are still "solidly within a linguistic and historical legacy of
individualism"(1990:33-34); this is no doubt true. What I see in car dreams is
466
ETHOS
IDENTITIES467
FIGURATIVE
ANALYSISAND TRAVELING
the speech patternsof elders (Ochs 1982:93).Two people gazing into one
another'seyes,asWesternmothersandbabiesandWesternloversdo, I suggest,
is a tropeforthe intersubjective
self.
If an intersubjective
patternof relatinghelpsto developour formof self in the
UnitedStates,Chodorow's
(1974,1978)workimpliesthat,inasmuchasa woman
is a primarycaretaker,
thisis truerfor girlsthanfor boys.Chodorowarguesthat
witha person
girlstendto constructtheirgenderidentitythroughidentification
the
mother.
Because
males
are
often
distant
intimatelyknown,
figures,boystend
to constructtheirsby definingthemselvesagainsttheirmothers.An oppositional
self-definitionlaysthe groundwork
for ego identity-a definitionof self in distinctionto others.At thisjunction,Chodorowbelieves,boysalsotendto reject
whatthe motherrepresentsto them,one-to-oneintimacy,in preferenceforcompetitivepeerrelations.Inasmuchas girlsconstructtheirgenderidentitythrough
an unbrokenidentificationwith theirmothers,they have less reasonto reject
as a basisfor identity.Tannen(2001),in hervideorecordingof
intersubjectivity
in theUnitedStates,showslittlegirlsembracingone
earlychildhoodinteractions
another,gazinginto one another'seyes, andtellingone anotherthey are alike,
whereasboyssit uncomfortably
withchairsparallel,gazingoff into spaceas they
talk.My maleandfemaledreamers'
of carstraveling,specidifferingdescriptions
or
not
the
to
a
fying
specifying driver,speaks
continuityof gendersubcultures
congruentwith those formsof self thatChodorowand Benjaminposit.These
formsreflectdifferentversionsof the carself-model.Thereis an "ego"versionof
this modelthatdreamersconfigureas one driverandwhichfeaturesindividual
versionin whichmorethanoneperautonomy;thereis another,"intersubjective"
son "drives"
andwhichfeaturesan inclusivemodelof autonomy.This statement
seem
WhatI amarguingis thatin the intersubjective
version
may
contradictory.
of the carself-model,peoplesee themselvesasindividuals
who floweasilyin and
out of onenesswith another.Evenwhenboundariesexpandto includeanother,
thislargerentitycanact"autonomously"
on a basisof volitions,desires,andneeds
thatparticipants
In
as
alike.
other
words,the two peopletogetheract
perceive
of others.
independently
How significantgender differencesare among individualshas long been
controversial
(Hyde2005;Tavris1992).Whena majorityof peoplefromeachsex
share a common experience,however,that experienceis likely to become subculturallysalient:that is, the basisfor norms and socializationpraxis.Childrenenter a
468
ETHOS
A Dream Pilgrimage
I now zoomin on an individualdreamaccountandanalysisthatdevelopseveral
carthemesmentionedabove.I callthisdreamerAnn.ShewasCaucasian,
23 years
old, andin her senioryear.I didnot helpher to interpretthe dreampresented
here andsawher resultsonlyin a finalpaperafterthe semesterwasover:
I dreamtthatI wasin myex-boyfriend,
Arne's,Camaro.My goodfriend,
was
also
there
and
we
were
headed
outon thestartof a roadtrip....
Sheila,
Ourcarwasat a completestopon a roadwithheavy,bumperto bumper
traffic.Suddenlythe groundbeganto shakebeneathus, andthe flat
road ... dramaticallydroppeddownward.The nose of our carnow looked
down a steep hill. ... Our car seemed ... almost vertical to the road.
Somehow,though, our carwas managingto hold onto the road.
FIGURATIVE
ANALYSISAND TRAVELING
IDENTITIES469
Our windows were rolled up, but I could hear screamingall aroundus.
Terrified,I turned to look out the backwindow. Other cars on the road
were beginning to lose their grip and were hurling down towardus ... as
if ... fallingoff a cliff. On the side of the roadway,in a patchof grass,was a
baby carriagelying on its side. Next to the carriagelay a baby,possiblya
one-year-old.I panickedand began screaming,"Oh my God! There's a
baby!There'sa baby!"BeforeArneor Sheilacould turnto look, a minivan
came crashingdown, hitting the baby and the carriage.I began to bawl,
uncontrollably,and coveredmy face with my hands.The van, takingthe
baby,came to a crashinghalt nearly 200 yardsbelow us, where the road
had eveneditself out.
Now our Camaro is parkedin a store lot. Arne stayed in the car, and
Sheilawaited outsidewith me. We both staredup at the cliff, which used
to be our road. I told her, "I have to go up there, and tell someone about
the baby.Someone has to bringsome help."I startedto climb the road,as
if I were a rock climber.The roadwas no longer made of concrete,but ...
of cold, deadflesh.My handsandfeet clung to it, andit would rip andtear
as I climbed. I reachedanotherman on this wall of flesh and I told him
about the baby,and that we needed a rescueteam.He told me therewere
too manypeoplehurt,anda rescueteamcouldn'tbe sent downfor one baby.
I returnedto Sheila,and the two of us decidedto make our way down to
the van, to see if there was anythingwe could do. We reached the van
safely,and I opened the backtwo doors to find a woman. ... She was lying
on her back,dressedin a Quaker'soutfit. To me she looked like a pilgrim.
She had bright red hair and freckles.There was blood coming into her
eyes from her forehead,but her eyes were wide open, staringat me. It was
very gory,and frightening.
I askedher, "Whereis the baby?"She respondedvery softly,"She'sright
here."Crawlingtowardme, fromthe frontof the van, camea toddler,possibly a three-year-old.She crawledright into my arms.I snatchedher out
of the van,holdingher tight to my chest.I placedher down on the ground,
and kneltto look into her eyes. She was the most beautifulchildI had ever
seen. Her skinwas porcelainand her hairwas brightwhite. For manyseconds we just staredat each other, silently.The woman in the van got out
and said in panic, "Where'smy baby?"I yelled, "She'sright over here!"I
pickedup the toddlerandhandedher to the woman.I then awoke.
Insteadof specifyingthedriver,Annsays,"wewereheaded":
herreferenceis inclusive of threepeople-herself,Arne,and Sheila-and evokesthe intersubjective
self-model discussedpreviously.As the car belongs to Arne, one presumes he is
driving,but Ann does not conceive the situationin terms of his agency:he is silent
470
ETHOS
andpassivethroughout-abystander
whomAnn,lateranalyzingthe dream,saw
asa "hole."Anndecidedto usea projective
1(2001)devisedcalleddream
technique
to
this
dream.
The
dreamer
first
chooses
severaldreamfiguresto
play interpret
and
abilitiesin her
role-play thenguesseswhatunexpressed
feelingsandunrealized
consciouspersonality
andculturethe dreamrepresents.
shorthand
for these
My
personalandculturalabsencesis "hole.""Whentryingto guesswhatthe holes...
themissingpartsof thedreamwere,"Annwrote,"Arne's
helpwasmissing,aswell
asthe causeof theroadshaking,anda rescueteam."
If the dreamis a "roadtrip,"it beginswith motionlesscars.For class,Annread
the paperby Hollan,citedearlier,in whichhe analyzesthreecardreamsfroma
client,Steve,whichillustratea "senseof being
depressedmale psychoanalytic
stalledanddamaged"
(2003:71).Did readingHollan'sessay,whichportrayscars
as a symbol for self, bring cars into students'dreams?Less than one-sixth
dreamedof cars.Giventhe prevalenceof carsin youngpeople'sdailylives,one
wouldexpectcarsto be commondreamfiguresforthem.It doesnotseem,therefore, that their readinghad a stronginfluenceon their dreamcontent.Ann's
dream,likeSteve's,beginswithmotionlesscars,butshewasnot depressed.Ann's
dreamcarsaremotionlessbecauseof a trafficjam,evokingscenesfrommodern
citylife-freeways,crowdeddowntownstreets,andso on. Soon her boyfriend's
Camaro"isparkedin a storelot."The traffic-jammed
carsdepicta problemthat
the parkedcar reiterates:the intersubjective
car self-modeldoes not get Ann
whereshewantsto go;it is no vehicleof progressforher.
In cardreams,dreamers
oftenreferto carsasif theyareagents;followingHaraway
(1991),one mightcall them cyborgs.In Ann'searthquake
scene,her car has a
and
"looked
down
a
like
in
"nose"
steephill," cars cartoonsthathaveheadlightsfor
Ann's
car
also
onto
theroad,justasshedoesin theclimbingscene,sugeyes.
hangs
an
betweenAnnandthe car.Overthe courseof the
gesting initialidentification
dreamanddreamplay,however,sheexplorestheproblemswiththisidentification.
ForAnn,the roadis animatedtoo. Whileit appearsdeadassheripsandtearsher
wayupward,it hasbeenaviolentactorupto thispoint,firstshaking,thenangling
Ann'sroad,I suggest,
down,andtheneveningitselfout,andit is madeof "flesh."
posesa travelingidentitythatis feminineratherthanmasculine.Femaleecstatics
in Sri Lanka describe themselves in trance as "shakingbelow" (the waist), and
Obeyesekere (1981) sees this bodily reaction as female orgasm. Inasmuchas the
dream earthquakehas orgiasticimplications(as Hemingway [1940] puts it, "the
IDENTITIES
471
ANALYSISAND TRAVELING
FIGURATIVE
472 ETHOS
Dream Playing
When demonstratingdreamplay in class, I staged dialogues between individual
dreamersand their dream figures. Ann acted out and dialogued with her dream
figureson her own, not before an audience:her role-playingwas purelyimaginal.3
She first chose to play the three year old; although "a toddler,"she named this
IDENTITIES473
ANALYSISAND TRAVELING
FIGURATIVE
I am 3 yearsold. I havewhiteskinandwhitehair.I am a
beautifulchild,angeliclooking.
Areyou allright?
Of courseI am.I knewyou'dcomeforme.
Who areyou?
I amyou.Don'tyourecognizeme?
I thoughtI'dlostyou.
No. I'mnothurt,not one scratchon me.
Whois thatwoman?
Shetakescareof me.
I loveyou,andI wasso scared!
Yousavedus,thereis nothingmoreyoucando.
474
ETHOS
ME [ANN]:
W:
M:
W:
M:
Is thisyourbaby?
I amresponsible
forher.
Whyareyoudressedlikethat?
BecauseI walkwithGod.
I wasn'texpectingto findyouhere.
W:
M:
Why?
Sheseemedso alone.
Do I makeyouangry?
No, butI amsad.
It is okto loveher.I'msurethatshelovesyoutoo.
I justwantedto keepher.
She'snotyourresponsibility.
W:
M:
W:
M:
W:
"Woman"concatenatesopposites.On the one hand,Womanis a spiritualtraveling figure: Ann said she "looked like a pilgrim."While Clifford likes
as a metaphorfortravelingcultures,he is uncomfortable
withthis
"pilgrimage"
term because "its 'second' [spiritual] meanings tend to predominate"
(1992:110). This dreameris very comfortablewith these meanings:she
the Quaker,to beherpilgrim
appointsa properlyAmericanimageof spiritualism,
who "walkswith God."On the otherhand,Womanis not one of those puritanicalpilgrimswiththeirScarletLettermodelsof femininity.Her redfreckles
and hairimplypassion,and "quake"puns on the earthquakewith which the
dreamopened,an eventthat,psychoanalytically
considered,suggestsorgasm.
The term Quakeris descriptiveof bodilyquaking:it derivesfromits founder's
admonitionto "trembleat the wordof the Lord"(Morris1979:1067).
The Quaker'sbleedingis a terrifyingeventin this dreamthatAnn finds"very
For women,sexualcoming-of-ageis concomitantwith
gory,and frightening."
and
defloration-both
of whichintimateporousboundaries
bleeding-menses
like the intersubjective
self-model.In Ann'sQuakerimage,blood is displaced
fromlowerto upper.Froma psychoanalytic
anupwarddisplacement
perspective,
of sexualsymbolismis classic.Decapitation,for example,maysignifycastration,
or a bignose,a bigpenis.Blood,in fact,fastensWoman'stwoapparently
opposed
meanings, spiritualismversus sexuality."She was bleeding from her forehead,"
Ann wrote, "likeJesus on the cross."While Woman appearsto need saving, she
is actuallya female version of the Savior.In Ann'swords, Woman
475
FIGURATIVE
ANALYSISAND TRAVELING
IDENTITIES
476
ETHOS
car self-model and intersubjectivity.In Ann's dream, lack of car control leaves a
baby and a mother figure exposed to a crash. This sequence inspires Ann to
emerge from her intersubjectiveidentity and assume the role of an adventurer
who overcomes a great obstacle (a wall of cold dead flesh) to rescue another.
Baby confirms Ann's identity as a hero, telling her, "Yousaved us"; this plural
again evokes the intersubjective mother/child relation, which Ann fears she
endangered by growing up. As she put it, "I have reached an important part of
my life where change is inevitable, but I am afraidto lose ... relationships as I
now know them." Baby assures Ann, "I'm not hurt, not one scratch on me."
Establishing that what she values in the past is safe, Ann began exploring her
identity as a savior-herothrough Woman. Whereas Baby and what she signifies
are unaffected by the hurling cars, Woman, the dream's personification of
mothering, is harmed. It makes narrativesense, then, that through this identification Ann decides (at least for the present) againsta mother identity:Woman
tells Ann that Baby is "not your responsibility."
Next, Ann developed another aspect of Woman-the pilgrim-or, more precisely, the pilgrimage. She decided to play a charactershe called "Road":
ROAD:
ME[ANN]:
R:
M:
But you'rehurtingeveryone.
R:
M:
R:
Cars are the most obvious figure for U.S. travelingidentities-as in the science
fiction joke where cars are the earth'smost prominent inhabitants, and outer
space beings, observing global life, think all would be well if the cars were not
ridden with those awful parasites!But roads are a venerable figure for traveling
identities as well. At the opening of this article, discussing cars, I inevitably also
invoked U.S. road metaphors-Route 61, Route 66, "my way or the highway,"
and so on. As an example of the road self-model, I turn to a favorite children's
traveling movie, The Wizardof Oz (Langley et al. 1988).
FIGURATIVE
ANALYSISAND TRAVELING
IDENTITIES477
Goodroads,goodroads,wishingyoua goodroad
Mayyoufindyourcomfortin friendsalongtheway.[1989]
This song alsoassociates"theroad"with following-"a calling"or "acompulsion."The roadhas long been a majorfigurein U.S. popularmusicbecause,
akinto the car,it offersfreedom-an escapefromthe intractableproblemsof
realsocialcontexts.Does it alsosuggesta travelingself-modelcompatiblewith
Justas therearetwo featuresto the suitcaseself-the ego and
intersubjectivity?
intersubjectivity-thereappearto be two figuresthatconveyit in dreams:the
carandthe roadway.
Like Dorothy,Ann'sfirstreactionto transportis panic,but afterdreamplay
Ann wrote, "The roadlets me know that I shouldbe excitedfor change. ..
Transitionis difficultfor me, but I do knowthatI'll soon be comfortableand
findhappinessin my new adventures."
Throughthis dreamworkAnn realized
that"fearis not failureand ... my subconscious[is]cheeringon my own independence.Beingscaredof the futuredoesn'tmeanit stillwon'thappen."
Ann'sdreamaccountand dreamworkanticipatethe transitionto postcollege
life, practicingfor it like playpracticesfor adulthood-mimingits threatsand
dangers.AsJung (1972),Wallace(1952),andBasso(1987)hold, this dreamis
prospective,supportingthe forwardmovementof Ann'spersonalityand the
forwardmovement of her culture. Independencein the sense of moving
beyond the limiting worlds of home and known relationshipsinto an uncertain
future often seems at odds with protecting one's capacity for love, trust, and
intimacy.This incipient antipathyis the underside of the car self-model and is a
478 ETHOS
FIGURATIVE
IDENTITIES479
ANALYSISAND TRAVELING
new sensory data by sorting them into and helping to transform emotion
schemas (cf. Ewing 2003; Mageo 2002a, 2003:23-42).
Dreams, dream accounts, and dreamworklike Ann's in this sense do "the work
of culture."This phrase, of course, comes from Obeyesekere (1981, 1990), but
culturalwork, in his view, occurs through the evolution of "personalsymbols,"
not through dream symbols. When individualsexpress private experience with
public symbols, those symbols become personal. As an example, Obeyesekere
presents the Sri Lankan ecstatics mentioned earlier.Their schizophrenogenic
personal histories induce visions in which a god gives them matted locks. In Sri
Lankan religious traditions, matted locks are a public symbol, which Sri
Lankansgenerally see as signs of divine patronage and spiritualpower. By articulating their private traumaswith a culturalcommon of religious images, these
women forge personal symbols, which gradually move them beyond painful
affect and provide a path back into the social world: they become paid religious
specialists. In contrast, Obeyesekere argues, dream symbols are simply products of "deep motivation"-those compulsions that psychoanalysts attribute
to early family relations and see as "biologically based" even if "culturally
influenced" (1981:80).
In light of the foregoing figurative analysis, I question this distinction. Early
family relations effect an internalization not only of quasi-universal family
dynamics but also, in Vygotsky's(1978:57) terms, of the culturally and historically specific social relations in which children develop. The contemporary
culture of boys growing up in the United States, for example, is likely to favor
ego development, while that of girls' usually favorsintersubjectivity.People use
the car as a symbol for self-models that these early relations foster, but Ann's
dream discloses more than these relations and concomitant models: it illuminates her reactions to these models. Cultural models, together with our
reactions to them, constitute deep motivations-motivations that render the
self as a changing system entangled with others in shifting contexts, ratherthan
merely with the verities and vicissitudes of its own biology. This interplayis the
"motivation"behind Ann's dreams and dreamwork.
Many see the conscious ego alone as having motives-reasons and aims for
action. Theorists since Jung, however, have viewed the self as characterizedby
subself systems with identities of their own, identities that people may not recognize (Hollan 2000). Thus, Ann said to Baby, "Who are you?" and Baby
480
ETHOS
FIGURATIVE
ANALYSISAND TRAVELING
IDENTITIES481
482
ETHOS
FIGURATIVE
IDENTITIES483 )
ANALYSISAND TRAVELING
MARIE
JEANNETTE
MAGEOis Professorof Anthropologyat WashingtonState
Pullman.
University,
Notes
Acknowledgments. I thankJanetKeller,my "Publishingand ProfessionalCommunication"classes,
and StanleyP. Smith for their carefulreadingof the manuscriptand for their generous comments.
1. I see the self as constituted by acts of identification with internal elements of experience, with
persons, groups, and representations in the culturalworld (Mageo 1998:3-36; Mageo and Knauft
2002), and as fluctuatingbetween contexts (Hall 1996). People organize and give culturalmeanings
to these identifications through shared self-models.
2. For examples, see Lohmann 2003; Mageo 2003; Stewart 2004.
3. For a comparison ofJung's (1976) active imagination, Perls's (1971) gestalt therapy,and Rogers's
(195 1) client-centered therapy,see Mageo 2001.
4. Both The Wizardof Oz and "Good Roads"depict opposed urges toward "home"and "the road."
"Homes/houses"are anotherprominent figurein my dreamcollection. Homes might be apartments
and have a variety of rooms that often appearedseparately.In varying forms and ratios, images of
dwelling and of travelingareprobablyimportantfiguresin many culturesthat depictmodels for being
a person. Other common figures in my collection include TVs, planes, forests, pets, guns, and of
coursenumeroustypes of people such as boyfriends,girlfriends,parents,siblings,friends,and spouses.
5. Lohmann (2003) takes traveling to be a uniting theme in Pacific Islands dreaming.
References Cited
Ahnert,L., M. R. Gunnar,M. E. Lamb,andM. Berthel
2004 Transition to Care. Child Development
75:639-650.
Ainsworth,MaryD. Salter
1973 The Developmentof Infant-MotherAttachment.In Reviewof ChildDevelopment Research, vol. 3. B. M. Caldwell and H. N. Ricciuti, eds. Pp. 1-94.
Chicago:Universityof ChicagoPress.
Allison, Anne
2001 Playing with Power. In Power and the Self. J. Mageo, ed. Pp. 71-93. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Barthes, Roland
1977 Image-Music-Text. S. Heath, trans. New York: Hill and Wang.
Basso, Ellen B.
1987 The Implications of a Progressive Theory of Dreaming. In Dreaming. B. Tedlock,
ed. Pp. 86-104. School of American Research, Advanced Seminar Series. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Baudrillard, Jean
1988 Jean Baudrillard. M. Poster, ed. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
484
ETHOS
Benjamin,Jessica
1988 The Bonds of Love. New York:Pantheon.
Bunyan,John
N.d. Pilgrim's Progress. New York:H. M. Caldwell.
Cassidy,Judy, and Phillip R. Shaver
1999 Handbook of Attachment. New York:Guilford.
Chodorow, Nancy
1974 Family Structure and Feminine Personality. In Women, Culture and Society.
M. Z. Rosaldo and L. Lamphere, eds. Pp. 42-66. Stanford: Stanford University
Press.
1978 The Reproduction of Mothering. Berkeley:University of California Press.
Clifford,James
1992 Traveling Cultures. In Cultural Studies. L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, and P. A.
Treichler, eds. Pp. 96-111. New York:Routledge.
Crapanzano,Vincent
2003 Concluding Reflections. In Dreaming and the Self. J. Mageo, ed. Pp. 175-189.
Albany: State University of New YorkPress.
Damasio, Antonio R.
1994 Descartes' Error.New York:Avon Books.
1999 The Feeling of What Happens. New York:Harcourt Brace.
D'Andrade, Roy
1995 The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Davidoff, Leonore, and Catherine Hall
1987 Family Fortunes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Eggan, Dorothy
1952 The Manifest Content of Dreams. AmericanAnthropologist 54(4):469-485.
Ewing, Katherine P.
2003 Diasporic Dreaming, Identity and Self Constitution. In Dreaming and the Self.
J. Mageo, ed. Pp. 43-60. Albany: State University of New YorkPress.
Fairbairn,W. Ronald D.
1952 Endopsychic Structure Considered in Terms of Object-Relationships. In Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality. W. Ronald D. Fairbairn,ed. Pp. 82-136.
London: Tavistock.
Foucault, Michel
1988 Technologies of the Self. In Technologies of the Self. L. H. Martin, H. Gutman,
and P. H. Hutton, eds. Pp. 16-49. Amherst: University of MassachusettsPress.
1990 The History of Sexuality,vol. 1. R. Hurley, trans. New York:Random House.
Freud, Sigmund
1922 Beyond the Pleasure Principle. C.J. M. Hubback, trans. London: International
Psycho-Analytical Press.
1956[1900] The Interpretationof Dreams. New York:Basic Books.
1961 Civilization and Its Discontents. James Strachey, trans. New York: W. W.
Norton.
Geertz, Clifford
1984 From the Natives' Point of View. In Culture Theory. R. A. Shweder and R. A.
LeVine, eds. Pp. 123-136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ANALYSISAND TRAVELING
IDENTITIES485
FIGURATIVE
Giddens,Anthony
1991 ModernityandSelf-Identity.Stanford:StanfordUniversityPress.
Gilligan,Carol
1982 In a DifferentVoice.Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversityPress.
Hall, Calvin,andRobertVande Castle
1966 The ContentAnalysisof Dreams.New York:Appleton-Century-Croft.
Hall, Stuart
1996 Introduction.In Questionsof CulturalIdentity.S. Hall andP.DuGuy,eds.Pp.
1-17. London:Sage.
Haraway,Donna
1991 A CyborgManifesto.In Simians,Cyborgs,and Women.Pp. 149-182. New
York:Routledge.
Hemingway,Ernest
1940 ForWhom the BellTolls.New York:Scribner.
Hollan,Douglas
2000 Constructivist
Modelsof Mind,Contemporary
andthe DevelPsychoanalysis,
American
of
Culture
opment
Theory.
Anthropologist102(3):538-550.
2003 SelfscapeDreams.In Dreamingandthe Self.J. Mageo,ed. Pp. 61-74. Albany:
StateUniversityof New YorkPress.
2005 Dreamingin a GlobalWorld.InA Companionto PsychologicalAnthropology.
C. CaseyandR. B. Edgerton,eds.Pp. 90-102. Oxford:BlackwellPublishing.
Hyde,JanetS.
2005 The GenderSimilarityHypothesis.AmericanPsychologist60:581-592.
Jung,CarlG.
1972 The StructureandDynamicsof the Psyche,vol. 8:The CollectedWorks.R. E
C. Hull, trans.BollingenSeries.Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress.
1976 The VisionSeminars.Vol. 2. Zurich:Spring.
Kohut,Heinz
1971 The Analysisof the Self.New York:International
UniversitiesPress.
Kondo,DorinneK.
1990 CraftingSelves.Chicago:Universityof ChicagoPress.
Langley,Noel, FlorenceRyerson,andEdgarAllanWoolf
1988 The Wizardof Oz. Screenplay.
SantaMonica:Janus/FilmsandVoyagerPress.
Levy,RobertI.
1973 Tahitians.Chicago:Universityof ChicagoPress.
1974 Tahiti,Sin,andthe Questionof IntegrationbetweenPersonalityandSocioculturalSystems.In Cultureand Personality.R. A. LeVine,ed. Pp. 287-306. New
York:Aldine.
Lohmann,RogerI., ed.
2003 DreamTravelers.New York:Palgrave.
Mageo,Jeannette
1995 The ReconfiguringSelf.AmericanAnthropologist97(2):282-296.
1998 TheorizingSelfin Samoa.AnnArbor:Universityof MichiganPress.
2001 DreamPlayandDiscoveringCulturalPsychology.Ethos29(2):187-217.
2002a IntertextualInterpretation,
Fantasy,and SamoanDreams.Cultureand Psychology8:417-448.
486 ETHOS
2002b Self Models and Sexual Agency. In Power and the Self. J. Mageo, ed. Pp.
141-176. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
2003 Dreaming and the Self. J. Mageo, ed. Albany: State University of New York
Press.
Mageo, Jeannette, and Bruce Knauft
2002 Introduction. In Power and the Self. J. Mageo, ed. Pp. 1-28. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Markus, Hazel R., and Shinobu Kitayama
1991 Culture and the Self. Psychological Review 98:224-253.
Morris, William, ed.
1979 The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. Boston:
Houghton Mifflin.
Muller, Heidi
1989 Good Road. FromMatters of the Heart. CD. Twisp, WA: CascadiaMusic.
Noy, Pinchas
1969 A Revision of the PsychoanalyticTheory of the PrimaryProcess. International
Journal of Psychoanalysis50:155-178.
1979 The PsychoanalyticTheory of Cognitive Development. Psychoanalytic Study
of the Child 34:169-216.
Obeyesekere, Gananath
1981 Medusa'sHair. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
1990 The Work of Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ochs, Elinor
1982 Talking to Children in Western Samoa. Language in Society 11:77-104.
Perls, Frederick S.
1971 Gestalt Therapy Verbatim.New York:Bantam.
Rogers, Carl R., ed.
1951 Client-Centered Therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Shulman, David, and Guy G. Stroumsa
1999 Dream Cultures. New York:Oxford University Press.
Spiro, Melford
2003 The Anthropological Import of Blocked Access to Dream Associations. In
Dreaming and the Self. J. Mageo, ed. Pp. 165-174. Albany: State University of
New YorkPress.
Stephen, Michele
1989 Self, the Sacred Other, and Autonomous Imagination. In The Religious Imagination in New Guinea. G. Herdt and M. Stephen, eds. Pp. 41-66. New
Brunswick,NJ: Rutgers University Press.
1995 Dreaming and the Hidden Self. In A'aisa'sGifts. Michele Stephen, author. Pp.
111-173. Berkeley:University of CaliforniaPress.
2003 Memory, Emotion and the Imaginal Mind. In Dreaming and the Self. J.
Mageo, ed. Pp. 97-132. Albany: State University of New YorkPress.
Stewart, Charles, ed.
2004 Anthropological Approaches to Dreaming. Special issue, Dreaming 14(2-3).
Strauss, Claudia, and Naomi Quinn
1997 A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
FIGURATIVE
IDENTITIES487
ANALYSISAND TRAVELING
Tannen,Deborah
2001 He Said,She Said.Video.55 min.Los Angeles:Into the ClassroomMedia.
Tavris,Carol
1992 The Mismeasureof Women.New York:SimonandSchuster.
Vande Castle,Robert
1983 AnimalFiguresin Fantasyand Dreams.In New Perspectiveson Our Lives
with CompanionAnimals.A. KacherandA. Beck,eds.Pp. 148-173.Philadelphia:
Press.
Universityof Pennsylvania
Vygotsky,L. S.
1978 Internalizationof Higher PsychologicalFunctions.In Mind in Society.M.
Cole,V.John-Steiner,S. Scribner,andE. Souberman,eds.Pp. 52-57. Cambridge,
MA:HarvardUniversityPress.
Wallace,AnthonyF.C.
1952 HandsomeLake and the Great Revivalin the West. AmericanQuarterly
149-165.
(Summer):
D.
W
Winnicott,
UK:Penguin.
1967 PlayingandReality.Harmondsworth,