Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A.
Historical growth
Britains constitutional title today is the United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Northern Ireland or UK. The nation comprises large and smaller islands off the
north-western European mainland, which at various points are touched by the
North Sea, the English Channel, the Irish Sea or the Atlantic Ocean.
In prehistory, these areas were visited by Old, Middle and New Stone Age
nomads. Some of whom settled permanently.
From about 600 BC-AD 1066 / invasions and settlements from people originated
in mainland Europe: Celts, Belgic tribes, Romans, Germanic tribes (Anglo-Saxons),
Scandinavians and Normans (French). These immigrants collectively created a
multi-ethnic British population with mixed identities and different origins.
Between the ninth and twelfth centuries AD settlers and invaders contributed to
the building of blocks on which were gradually established the separate nations
of England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland.
Developments within the islands were influenced first by expansionist (military
aims of English monarchs) and second by a series of political unions.
Ireland and Wales have been under English control since the 12 th and 13th
centuries.
Scotland was joined dynastically to England in 1603.
Movement towards a British state was achieved by political unions between
England, Wales and Scotland (Great Britain) in 1707 and between Great Britain
and Ireland in 1801. In 1921 southern Ireland left the union while Northern Ireland
remained part of the UK.
These historical developments encouraged the gradual creation of a centralized
British state, the UK, which owed much to English models and dominance. State
structures, social organizations and constitutional principles 1 developed slowly
and unevenly with periods of violent upheaval. The modern British state
developed in an evolutionary and pragmatic manner supposedly thanks to
insular and conservative mentalities with peoples preference for
traditional habits and institutions. Some influences may have come from
1 Parliamentary democracy, government, the law, economic systems, a welfare
state and religious faiths.
abroad but the absence of any successful external military invasion since the
Norman Conquest (AD 1066) has allowed the nations to develop internally in
distinctive ways. The structures and philosophies of British statehood have been
imitated by other countries or exported abroad through the creation of a global
empire from the sixteenth century and a commercial need to build world markets
for British goods.
British Empire: English monarchs tried military expansionism within the islands
and mainland Europe. Following initial reversals in Europe they sought raw
materials, possessions, trade and power overseas.
Successive agricultural revolutions added to the countrys wealth, exports,
prestige and international trade. Britain became an industrial largely urban
country from the late eighteenth century because of a series of industrial
revolutions and inventions been responsible for major influential scientific,
medical and technological advances.
By the nineteenth century the country had become a dominant industrial and
political world power, a main player developing Western ideas and principles of
law, property, business, liberty, capitalism, parliamentary democracy and civil
society.
Political union within Britain encouraged the idea of British identity (Britishness)
which all components countries of the UK could share although national identities
in the four countries of the union persisted. Changes have come in the latest
century first with the partition of Ireland in 1921 second in devolution of some
political power from the London parliament to Scotland, Wales and Northern
Ireland by 1998-9. A fierce debate about the nature of Britishness national
identity within the union and the future constitutional and political structure of
the United Kingdom is still alive.
There have been other political reforms as extension of vote in the nineteenth
and twentieth century, diminishing power of aristocratic House of Lords and
increasing authority of elected House of Commons or parliamentary monarchy
and substantial collectivist social changes such as nationalization and creation of
a welfare state.
Significant change and relative decline experienced in the twentieth century. Its
social and economic strength was reduced by the effects of the two world wars
and dismantling of the imperial power, increased foreign competition and internal
social change. Its ethnic composition, state structures, social policies, religious
beliefs and economic institution have been all affected by profound domestic
developments and external pressures.
The nation has been forced into a search of a new identity, internationally and
nationally while maintaining many of its traditional worldwide commercial,
cultural and political links. It has moved from empire toward a membership of the
European Union.
Britain has rarely seen itself as an integral part of mainland Europe. Its
psychological and physical isolation from Europe is slowly changing increasing
the cooperation between Britain and other European Countries (opening of a
Channel train between England and France in 1994). Nevertheless in many British
people still appear scepticism about Europe linked with historical impulses to
national independence and isolation.
British politicians argue that isolationism is not a viable option in a globalized
world and Britain has been involved in recent overseas military action (Bosnia,
Afghanistan, etc) attracting terrorism threats itself (Bomb attack in 7 July 2005).
These terrorist attacks have raised debate about the nature and loyalty of the
countrys multi-ethnic population.
B.
Structural change
conditioned
by
social,
economic,
legal,
religious
and
political
with
inadequate
policies.
May
people
disenchanted
distrust
of
model. But these communities can also be dominated by elites. This situation at
both local and national levels may provoke a sense of alienation and
powerlessness in the excluded groups.
The British way of life and British identities are determined by how people
function within and react to social structures (in their daily lives). These structural
features reflect a range of practices on both high and popular cultural levels on
Britain.
High cultural forms may often appeal to a minority and be connected to wealth
and class concerns although now they are opened up to more widespread
participation.
Popular cultural activities have always been present in British society. They have
become more numerous since 1960s because a great affluence, more varied life
opportunities and new accessible forms. Such a mass popular culture is now
significant and influences social patterns, behaviour, economic consumption and
the adoption of very diverse lifestyles which is for some a trivialization of British
life.
The number and variety of top-down and bottom-up structures mean that there
are many different and often conflicting ways of life reflection of the
pluralistic nature of the society. Some critics defend that the main defining
features of British life are a healthy diversity and change at all levels meanwhile
other believe these phenomena have led to social fragmentation and antisocial
behaviour, a weakened sense of community.
It has historically been argued that national and local behaviour in Britain has
often reflected a strong individualistic streak in the British mentality which views
authority with suspicion. In the latest general election (2010) was debated
whether the country was an entrepreneurial, a cooperative or a centralized state.
It was also questioned whether traditional notions of community, engagement
and commitment are failing in Britain leading towards a broken society without
fixed social or familiar points.
Traditionally organizational structures must adapt themselves to new situations if
they are to survive and their present roles may therefore be different from their
original functions. They are nowadays supposed to respond to current public
worries. It is questioned whether British national and international institutions are
able to cope with and reflect the needs and demands of a complex contemporary
life.
It is also questioned how the country should be organized socially, politically and
economically. It is debated whether this soul-searching results in action or
promotes divisive. After 2010 election these doubts and concerns remain.
C.
Contemporary conditions
Since the last thirty years a multicultural Britain can no longer rely for its
cohesion on a common background, the old certainties no longer prevail.
Immigration has enhanced and enlivened the country; it has brought to Britain
people with beliefs, values and backgrounds at odds with the prevailing culture.
A
misunderstood
multiculturalism
has
led
to
social
and
cultural
fragmentation.
Britain is today a complex society in which diversity and change have created
problems as well as advantages. There are divisions caused by such factors as
the influence of London on the rest of the country, the cultural distinctiveness of
Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and England, demands for greater autonomy,
less centralized control from London and greater democracy; disparities between
affluent and economically depressed areas, cultural and economic gaps between
areas (north-south) political variety, position of women, special-interest groups
and minority ethnic communities,
and
support
for
national
institutions.
Britons
are
now
more
of 2007-09. Opinion polls suggest that greater prosperity has not brought greater
happiness for many Britons. Consumerism, increased ethnic diversity, feminism,
greater individual freedom and tolerance for alternative lifestyles, technological
advances and new economic policies have transformed Britain. However,
continuing structural and social problems warn against undue complacency.
Conservative governments under Margaret Thatcher (1979-90) tried to reform
social structures and promote new economic attitudes reducing the states role in
public affairs and replace it with market-forces. The focus was upon economic
growth; competition; privatization; the creation of choice and standards in public
services such as education and health; and the reform of bodies such as the
trade
unions,
some
professions
and
local
governments.
People
were
market
or
neo-liberal
economic
programmes
continued
under
the
Conservative Prime Minister John Major (1990-97), Labour Prime Minister Tony
Blair (19997-2007) and Gordon Brown (2007-10).
Since gaining power in 1997 the Labour government followed the Conservative
economic approach. It also attempted to modernize Britain by creating a new,
young and inclusive society. The Labour Party has modernized its internal
structures and moved to the political centre to appeal to middle Britain. Labour
claimed it was addressing social and economic realities, emphasizing personal
initiative. It spent large amounts of public money on education, health, transport,
social security and the police service but a vast majority of people didnt see
great improvements in public services and they lost their trust in the Labour
leadership. Difficulties continued with a growing disbelief by voters in the Labour
governments ability to steer the country through recession. In 2010 election
Labour lost ninety-one seats in the House of Commons.
Social change can occur in various, interconnected, ways. Some social
structures wither away because they are no longer used while others are
reformed internally. Additional forces for change are opposition political parties,
pressure groups, grassroots movements, campaigns by the media to promote
D.
demonstrations, petitions
Individualistic, independent and dissenting British tradition that has been
historically cynical, irreverent and critical about state structures and
powerful individuals.
In recent years the state has intruded further into peoples lives, micro-managing
their work and leisure.
Although polls can be significant and accurate indications of how people are
reacting to the state of British society they have to be approached with a certain
caution.
Most important issues facing Britain today (April 2010):
1.
2.
3.
4.