Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 28 September 2015
Received in revised form
9 March 2016
Accepted 10 March 2016
Available online 11 March 2016
Bread made with corn our has a rich tradition in several countries. On the other hand, nixtamalization is
a process conferring malleability and functionality to corn our via calcium incorporation. The aim of this
work was to study the rheological and thermal properties of dough, and the textural and microstructural
features of bread obtained from nixtamalized corn (NCF)/wheat our (WF) blends. Thermal analysis
indicated that NCF promoted the interaction between starch molecules and lipids. The incorporation of
NCF improved the viscoelasticity of dough, indicative that the participation of lower amounts of gluten
(protein) due to WF substitution by NCF might be compensated by the cross-linking capacity of calcium
ions. Morphological analysis via SEM showed that as NCF was incorporated, a more compact and porous
microstructure arose that caused breads to exhibit increasing hardness, but a decrease in the rest of the
textural characteristics. Increasing amounts of NCF led to more homogeneous bread crust color, characterized by a more subdued lightness and yellow hue. Overall, NCF offers a mean to improve dough
viscoelasticity and granular microstructure of wheat-based bread.
2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Dough
Nixtamalized corn our
Thermal properties
Viscoelasticity
1. Introduction
Bread made with wheat our accounts for about 50% of dietary
energy requirements in many countries. Although ours from other
botanical sources offer also high carbohydrate contents, the widespread usage of wheat our for bread making can be attributed to
its relatively high gluten content. Wheat proteins have the ability of
developing a viscoelastic network when the our is mechanically
blended with water. In turn, the viscoelastic network allows an easy
manipulation of dough for fabrication of a wide diversity of specialties. Besides, the viscoelastic matrix enables the retention of the
gas produced during fermentation, leading to aerated crumb bread
morphology.
It has been recognized that high costs of wheat importation in
regions where climatic conditions do not favor its cultivation (e.g.,
tropical and sub-tropical Africa) limits its utilization as a source of
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: jjar@xanum.uam.mx (J. Alvarez-Ramirez).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2016.03.011
0733-5210/ 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
159
t
J1 1 expt=lret ; for t < t1
h0
t1
Jt
J1 1 expt=lret ; for t > t1
h0
Jt J0
where J is the compliance, J0 (1/E0) is the instantaneous compliance, J1 is the retardation compliance, h0 is the (Newtonian) zero
shear stress viscosity, lret is the retardation time-constant and t1 is
the time at which the shear stress is removed. E0 is the instantaneous elastic modulus.
2.5. Bread variations
100 g of each dough variation were put into metallic containers
160
161
Table 1
Thermal parameters of dough and bread variations.
Sample
Dough variations
To ( C)
D0
D25
D50
D75
D100
Sample
36.72
36.91
37.45
38.22
38.39
0.92
0.65a
1.04a
0.76a
0.97a
38.60
38.68
38.73
39.23
39.89
0.77
0.97a
0.58a
1.10a
1.00a
1.70
2.78
3.92
4.02
4.57
Tm ( C)
a
0.03
0.08b
0.10c
0.14c
0.09d
44.07
44.75
44.83
45.67
45.92
DH2 (J g1)
Tp2 ( C)
a
1.10
1.25a
0.90a
1.17a
0.69a
49.94
50.16
50.55
51.25
51.97
0.89
1.00a
1.52a
1.43a
1.30a
7.69
6.02
5.74
5.31
4.65
Te ( C)
d
0.27
0.18c
0.14b,c
0.17b
0.10a
54.19
55.06
55.43
56.43
57.89
2.17a
1.10a
1.00a
1.58a
1.74a
Bread variations
To ( C)
B0
B25
B50
B75
B100
DH1 (J g1)
Tp1 ( C)
a
90.91
85.66
81.91
77.58
73.33
DH1 (J g1)
Tp1 ( C)
d
1.82
2.57c,d
2.05b,c
2.71a,b
1.98a
112.24
109.76
107.91
104.18
101.85
2.81
2.19b,c
3.02a,b,c
2.60a,b
1.83a
553.70
498.70
441.80
379.00
321.85
Te ( C)
e
13.84
9.97d
12.37c
8.34b
9.65a
174.41
168.07
163.40
156.76
150.09
3.84d
5.04c,d
3.27b,c
3.92a,b
4.20a
Values are means standard error, of three replicates. Superscripts with different letters in same column indicate signicant differences (P 0.05).
Fig. 1. Viscoelastic properties of the different dough variations: (a) apparent viscosity, (b) storage modulus, (c) loss modulus, and (d) loss factor.
Table 2
Parameters of Burger's model of dough variations.
Sample
D0
D25
D50
D75
D100
J0 102 (Pa1)
1.92
0.59
0.65
0.54
0.04
0.10
0.06a
0.06b
0.08c
0.09c
J1 102 (Pa1)
7.98
6.91
6.63
6.31
5.64
0.23
0.26b
0.19b,c
0.20c,d
0.18e
h0 103 (Pa s)
lret (s)
63.27
69.62
76.41
77.61
83.60
0.43
0.62b
0.48c
0.65d
0.62e
1.63
2.83
10.09
12.68
18.86
0.23a
0.24a,b
0.29c
0.33c
0.31d
Values are means standard error, of three replicates. Superscripts with different
letters in same column indicate signicant differences (P 0.05).
162
starch chains, which promotes the formation of stronger gel networks (Lobato-Calleros et al., 2015). This way, the addition of NCF
enhanced dough microstructure by improving the viscoelasticity.
Fig. 2. Images of bread variations. Left panel: Photography showing nal color pattern of the bread crest. Figures Center panel: SEM images at 500 x. Right panel: SEM images at
1000 x. Figures (a) to (c) correspond to the bread formulation B0. The crumb appears with some fractures induced by the heterogeneous surface ow when the dough was baked.
Figures (d) to (f) corresponds to the formulation B25, gures (g) to (i) to the formulation B50, gures (j) to (l) to the formulation B75, while gures (m) to (B) to the formulation B100.
Arrows in SEM images indicate fractures and holes in the bread microstructure.
163
Table 3
Color parameters of the bread variations.
Sample
L*
B0
B25
B50
B75
B100
61.04
58.12
55.27
54.21
54.34
a*
1.2a
0.9b
1.1c
1.2c
1.1c
9.92
10.36
11.60
11.42
11.73
b*
0.7a
0.8b
0.7b
0.9b
0.7b
26.43
25.56
22.88
22.12
22.24
1.2a
1.1b
0.9b
1.0b
0.9b
Values are means standard error, of three replicates. Superscripts with different
letters in same column indicate signicant differences (P 0.05).
164
Table 4
Textural prole analysis (TPA) of bread variations.
Sample
Hardness (g)
B0
B25
B50
B75
B100
4893.50
5104.00
5409.50
5757.00
6121.50
97.87e
78.76d
75.33c
82.48b
95.27a
Adhesiveness (mJ)
0.92
0.81
0.65
0.49
0.23
0.03d
0.01c
0.02b
0.02b
0.01a
Resilience
0.19
0.16
0.12
0.11
0.09
0.02c
0.01b,c
0.01a,b
0.01a
0.01a
Cohesiveness
0.56
0.49
0.38
0.36
0.29
0.01e
0.02d
0.02c
0.01b
0.01a
Springiness (mm)
12.91
11.50
10.06
9.30
7.43
0.32e
0.35d
0.20c
0.25b
0.16a
Gumminess (g)
1989.80
1655.30
1443.70
1176.00
997.90
35.82d
38.80c
31.21b
33.88a
28.45a
Chewiness (mJ)
319.72
213.06
162.81
155.70
102.22
4.80e
5.72d
3.01c
2.80b
1.97a
Values are means standard error, of three replicates. Superscripts with different letters in same column indicate signicant differences (P 0.05).
165
Thachil, M.T., Chouksey, M.K., Gudipati, V., 2014. Amylose-lipid complex formation
during extrusion cooking: effect of added lipid type and amylose level on cornbased puffed snacks. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 49, 309e316.
Torbica, A., HadnaCev, M., Dap
cevi
c, T., 2010. Rheological, textural and sensory
properties of gluten-free bread formulations based on rice and buckwheat our.
Food Hydrocoll. 24, 626e632.
Torres, M.D., Fradinho, P., Raymundo, A., Sousa, I., 2014. Thermorheological and
textural behaviour of gluten-free gels obtained from chestnut and rice ours.
Food Bioproc. Technol. 7, 1171e1182.
Witczak, M., Juszczak, L., Ziobro, R., Korus, J., 2012. Inuence of modied starches on
properties of gluten-free dough and bread. Part I: rheological and thermal
properties of gluten-free dough. Food Hydrocoll. 28, 353e360.