Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ABSTRACT
Globally many firms are currently undergoing strategic change to adapt to the new market environment in order to
retain their market share and enhance their profitability. The strategic change programs arise from organized management
strategies such as culture change, business process engineering, empowerment and total quality. Various studies suggest
that strategic initiatives were mainly around improving quality and productivity, reducing costs, restructuring and culturebuilding, rather than finding partnerships and assistance from across the newly opened boundaries. The purpose of this
study therefore was to establish the influence of strategic change initiatives on operational performance of East African
Portland Cement Limited, Kenya. The study employed a descriptive design using quantitative approaches. The target
population was all 500 employees of East African Portland Cement Company. The study used questionnaires to collect
primary data. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences was used to analyze the data and the results obtained were
presented using tables. The R2 value of 0.6851 implies that 68.5% of the variations in operational performance can be
explained by the variations in independent variables. This therefore means that other factors not studied in this study
contribute 31.5% of operational performance. It was established that all the independent variables positively related to
operational performance and were statistically significant at the 5% significance level.
to
Buchanan and Boddy (2009), to remain competitive, modern organizations should aim at uniqueness and superiority in all
spheres of their operations, technology, work procedures, goods and services, approaches in the various management
functions.
14
According to Kim and Mcintoch (2002), rapid technological change, easier entry by foreign competitors, and the
accelerating breakdown of traditional industry boundaries subject firms to new, unpredictable competitive forces.
Contemporary firms, operating in dynamic market contexts, often deal with these contingencies by implementing strategies
that permit quick reconfiguration and redeployment of assets to deal with environmental change. Manimala (2011) asserted
that strategic responses to environmental changes were mainly around improving quality and productivity, reducing costs,
restructuring and culture-building, rather than finding partnerships and assistance from across the newly opened
boundaries. The findings suggest that competition does have an impact on self-improvements and that the primary impetus
for strategy making is from ones own internal strengths than from the environment. In Kenya, many firms are currently
undergoing strategic change to adapt to the new market environment in order to retain their market share and enhance their
profitability. The strategic change initiatives arise from organized management strategies such as culture change, business
process engineering, empowerment and total quality. Other strategic change initiatives are driven by the need for
organizations to reposition themselves in the face of changing competitive conditions.
To establish the influence of business process initiatives on the operational performance of EAPC, Kenya.
To evaluate the influence of culture values initiatives on the operational performance of EAPC, Kenya.
To determine the effect of employee engagement initiatives on the operational performance of EAPC, Kenya.
15
LITERATURE REVIEW
With the ever changing environment, continuous change must be inculcated in the day-to-day running of
organizations if they want to keep pace with the goings on. Studies have noted that change is so complex and multifaceted
that mastering the challenge is not a specialized activity to be facilitated or driven by an expert but an increasingly
important part of every managers role. For the purpose of this study we review three strategic change initiatives, namely:
business process, culture values and employee engagement initiatives.
Business Process Initiatives and Operational Performance
According to Grigori et al., (2004), as business environment changes dynamically and competition becomes
fierce, it is important for enterprises to handle risks and to build efficient management strategies. Under these changes in
business environment, enterprises need to define their own critical success factors and key performance indicators to
evaluate the present state of operations, and then they try to find the method for improving performance. One of the most
widely used approaches considering the horizontal flow is business process management system. The system extends the
functionality of workflow management systems beyond automation into areas such as analysis, monitoring and
cross-organizational interactions. It also enables all stakeholders to have an understanding of an organization and its
performance, and to facilitate process improvement. Most of earlier studies have been focused upon process modeling,
execution, monitoring. Studies related to process improvement suggest general guidelines through establishment of a
framework rather than specific methods. Most of them assume that tasks or components of a process are mutually
independent (Lundberg, 2006). One of the key components of business process management is monitoring (Prisecaru,
2008). The degree of monitoring depends on what information the business wants to evaluate and analyze and how
business wants it to be monitored. To cope with such requirements, organizations must develop initiatives such as those in
business process management system since such initiatives enable organizations to manage and improve their processes
continuously.
Culture Values Initiatives and Operational Performance
In both private and public sectors, the key to success begins with the values of the organization. Values are deeply
held principles, ideals, or beliefs that people hold or adhere to when making decisions (Aluko, 2003). Individuals express
their values though their personal behaviors; organizations express their values through their cultural behaviors. According
to Kotter and Heskett (1992), companies with strong adaptive cultures based on shared values outperform other companies
by a significant margin. They found that, over an elevenyear period, the companies that cared for all stakeholders grew
four times faster than companies that did not. The values that make up the culture of an organization are either a reflection
of the underlying beliefs of the current leaders or they are the reflection of the heritage of past leaders. Most organizations
operate with default cultures. Because no one is measuring or paying attention to the culture, the underlying values and
beliefs of the leaders become the way things are done around here. According to Acar and Acar (2012, when there is a
lack of alignment between the values of the culture of the organization and the personal values of employees, the result is
low performance which can further result in low levels of staff engagement and poor quality of products and services. All
of these factors can have a significant impact on the financial performance of the organization or its ability to deliver
services of sustainable high quality. On the other hand, when the values of the organization are in alignment with the
inspirational values of employees, the result is high performance (Rajendra et al., 2007). There are two other major benefits
Impact Factor(JCC): 1.7539 - This article can be downloaded from www.impactjournals.us
16
to values alignment. First, when values are aligned, the culture of an organization is able to attract and retain talented
individuals. This gives organizations a significant commercial advantage, especially when talent is in short supply. Second,
values alignment builds a strong brand (Baird et al., 2011).
Employee Engagement and Operational Performance
According to Robinson et al., (2004), employee engagement can be seen as a positive attitude held by the
employee towards the organization and its value. An engaged employee is aware of business context, and works with
colleagues to improve performance within the job for the benefit of the organization. Many studies have tried to identify
factors leading to employee engagement and developed models to draw implications for managers. Their diagnosis aims to
determine the drivers that will increase employee engagement level. According to Penna (2007) meaning at work has the
potential to be valuable way of bringing employers and employees closer together to the benefit of both where employees
experience a sense of community, the space to be themselves and the opportunity to make a contribution, they find
meaning. Similarly, Blessing (2006) found that almost 60% of the surveyed employees want more opportunities to grow
forward to remain satisfied in their jobs. Strong manager-employee relationship is a crucial ingredient in the employee
engagement and retention formula. They suggest that a manager must align efforts with strategy, empower, promote and
encourage teamwork and collaboration, help people grow and develop and provide support and recognition where
appropriate. Studies have found positive relationship between employee engagement and organizational performance
outcomes: employee retention, productivity, profitability, customer loyalty and safety. Researches also indicate that the
more engaged employees are, the more likely their employer is to exceed the industry average in its revenue growth.
Employee engagement is found to be higher in double-digit growth companies. Research also indicates that engagement is
positively related to customer satisfaction (Coffman, 2000).
Concept of Operational Performance
Operational performance of a manufacturing organization can be measured through various indicators such as
quality, productivity, costs, capacity and inventory. In the case of lean manufacturing the specific performance indicators
include: factory time efficiency, flow time, through put and work in process inventory. According to Ondiek and Kisombe
(2012) factory time efficiency in the context of the sugar industries in Kenya is the index that measures the ability of a
factory to sustain operations throughout the year without interruptions. This is the time taken from when customers make
an order to the time they receive their order. According to Birech, (2011), standard individual performance measures
include: productivity measures, quality measures, inventory measures, lead-time measures, preventive maintenance,
performance to schedule, and utilization. According to the study, specific measures include: cost of quality; measured as
budgeted versus actual, variances - measured as standard absorbed cost versus actual expenses, period expenses - measured
as budgeted versus actual expenses, safety -measured on some common scale such as number of hours without an accident,
profit contribution.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The study adopted a descriptive research design. Saunders et al., (2009) describes descriptive research design as a
systematic, empirical inquiring into which the researcher does not have a direct control of independent variable as their
manifestation has already occurred or because the inherently cannot be manipulated. The design is appropriate as it entails
17
the collection of data on more than one case and at a single point in time in order to collect a body of quantitative or
quantifiable data in connection with two or more variables, which are then examined to detect patterns of association. The
target population comprised all 500 employees of East African Portland Cement Company, Kenya. The study utilized
simple random sampling technique which ensured that the target population was representative, reliable, flexible and
efficient. In this study an appropriate method to collect the primary data was a questionnaire. For the purposes of this
study, quantitative data was collected using a closed-ended questionnaire. The primary data was sourced from the answers
the participants gave during the survey process. The data collected from the questionnaires was analyzed with Statistical
Package for Social Sciences.
69
4.16
.831
3.82
.897
69
4.12
.785
69
3.77
.913
69
4.16
.812
18
Table 1: Condt
The organization has process improvement and
management in place which enhances operational 69
performance
Our organization values process input from
employees which helps in improvement of
business processes
69
4.27
.797
2.13
.911
Majority of the respondents agreed that their organization initiated work process documentations to keep business
processes up to date (4.16), that the organization used various performance data to manage various business processes
(3.82), that their organization used developed standard measures for evaluating process performance (4.12), that most
business processes in their organization were automated which made operations easier (3.77), that their organization
ensured that all employees had the requisite skills for effective task performance (4.16) and that the organization had
process improvement and management in place which enhanced operational performance (4.7). However, majority of
respondents disagreed when asked whether their organization valued process input from employees which helps in
improvement of business processes (2.13). The respondents had a high variation (0.913) shown by the standard deviation
value when asked whether most business processes in their organization were automated which made operations easier.
Influence of Culture Values Initiatives on Operational Performance
In this section the researcher presents various aspects touching on culture values initiatives and operational
performance and the findings are depicted in Table 2.
Table 2: Influence of Culture Values Initiatives on Operational Performance
n
Min
Max
Mean
Std. Dev.
69
2.18
.966
69
2.37
.947
69
3.98
.962
69
2.45
.971
69
4.31
.786
69
2.29
.933
69
2.42
.897
From the findings in Table 2, it was established that majority of the respondents agreed that their departments
highlighted mutual team goals and focused on promoting effective intergenerational workforce (3.98) and that their
organization had high level of staff engagement and a pursuit of excellence regarding the quality of products and services
(4.31). The respondents were however disagreed when asked whether their organizations had entrenched values which
NASS Rating: 3.18 - Articles can be sent to editor@impactjournals.us
19
helped in guiding employees in decision making (2.18), whether values that make up the culture of their organization
reflected the underlying beliefs of the current management (2.37), whether the organization ensured alignment between the
culture values of the organization and the personal values of employees(2.45), whether as a result of the culture values,
their organization was able to attract and retain talented individuals (2.29) or whether the culture values in their
organization had enabled them build a strong brand image (2.42). The study further analyzed the standard deviations and
found that all responses had a standard deviation of <1.00 which indicated smaller dispersion which was interpreted to
mean convergence of responses on all the propositions about the influence of culture value initiatives on operational
performance.
Influence of Employee Engagement Initiatives on Operational Performance
In this section the researcher presents various aspects touching on employee engagement initiatives and
operational performance and the findings are depicted in Table 3.
Table 3: Influence of Employee Engagement on Operational Performance
n
69
2.27
.898
69
2.34
.944
69
4.13
.677
69
2.11
.874
69
2.33
.992
69
2.16
.817
69
4.08
0.852
From the findings on Table 3, it was established that majority of the respondents agreed that the organization
ensured continuous training covering areas of increased job complexity which enhances performance (4.13) and that their
organization had a strong manager-employee relationship which is a crucial ingredient in the employee engagement and
retention formula (4.08). The respondents however disagreed when asked whether the organization aligned job design to
the requisite role and responsibilities for better operations performance (2.27), whether their organization recruited,
selected, trained, compensated and managed all the employees effectively which enhanced performance (2.34), whether
their organization recognized and rewarded voluntary contributions and proactive work behaviors thereby motivating
employees. (2.11), whether the organization had various schemes that enhanced job security, long-term engagement and
commitment (2.33) or whether their organization had necessary budgetary support from top management to invest in
engagement and commitment initiatives (2.16).
Impact Factor(JCC): 1.7539 - This article can be downloaded from www.impactjournals.us
20
Operational Performance
Table 4 shows the findings related to operational performance at EAPCC, Kenya.
Table 4: Operational Performance
n
69
4.35
.793
69
3.99
.952
69
2.19
.877
69
3.87
.899
4.11
.919
69
3.77
.991
69
2.39
.912
69
4.33
.827
From the findings in Table 4, majority of the respondents were in agreement that their organization had standards
that must be met to ensure factory time efficiency (4.35), that the organization had set stringent flow time schedules for all
functional departments that must be met throughout the manufacturing process (3.99), that they had maintenance schedules
that were adhered to and improvement made when needed (3.87), that their organization had a waste reduction policy that
guides all manufacturing operations (4.11), that the organization ensured strict compliance to all regulatory requirements
(3.77) and that legislations and regulations played some role in influencing operational performance of their organization
(4.33). The respondents however disagreed that they had an effective customer delivery systems management that ensures
delivery times are met (2.19) and that the organization had scheduled cycle times for their various products which ensured
throughput efficiency (2.39). The responses had a high variation (.991) when asked whether their organization ensured
strict compliance to all regulatory requirements.
Regression Analysis
The study carried out a regression analysis to test the significance of the influence of business process, culture
values and employee engagement initiatives. The model summary is depicted in Table 5.
Table 5: Regression Model Summary
Model
1
R
0.8277
R2
0.6851
Adjusted R2
0.6672
The R2 value of 0.6851 implies that 68.5% of the variations in operational performance can be explained by the
variations in independent variables. This therefore means that other factors not studied in this study contribute 31.5% of
operational performance at East African Portland Cement Company, Kenya. The researcher further conducted a multiple
21
regression analysis and the findings are depicted in Table 6. From the model, holding business process, culture values and
employee engagement initiatives constant, operational performance would increase by 3.511. It was established that a unit
increase in business process initiatives would cause an increase in operational performance by a factor of 0.438, a unit
increase in culture values initiatives would cause an increase in operational performance by a factor of 0.197 and a unit
increase in employee engagement initiatives would cause an increase in operational performance by a factor of 0.513.
Table 6: Multiple Regression Analysis
Model
1
Constant
Business Process
Culture Values
Employee Engagement
Un standardized
Coefficients
B
SE
3.511
1.393
0.438
0.117
0.197
0.075
0.513
0.138
Standardized
Coefficients
B
0.391
0.188
0.453
t
1.497
2.543
1.951
2.911
p
0.081
0.019
0.042
0.011
From the findings on Table 6, it was established that both employee engagement initiatives and business process
initiatives had the most influence on operational performance while culture values initiatives had the least influence on
operational performance. The un-standardized beta coefficients in Table 6 were then used to obtain the overall relationship
of the independent variables and the dependent variable and model was formulated as:
Y = 3.511 + 0.438X1 + 0.197X2 + 0.513X3
Where Y = Operational Performance, X1 = Business Process Initiatives, X2 = Culture Values Initiatives,
X3 = Employee Engagement Initiatives,
From the model it was established that all the independent variables positively related to operational performance
and were statistically significant at the 5% significance level. Furthermore, since all the p-values had values less that 0.05,
all the null hypotheses were rejected and the alternative hypotheses confirmed to be true. The findings are in agreement
with those of Malonza (2014) who established a similar trend in their study on lean manufacturing and operational
performance at Mumias Sugar Company Limited, Kenya.
CONCLUSIONS
The study concluded that though EAPCC had initiated various schemes to enhance business processes, the
organization needs to put in place measures that would enhance value process input from employees which helps in
improvement of business processes. It was concluded that for enhanced operational performance the organization needs to
entrench values which help in guiding employees in decision making and ensure alignment between the culture values of
the organization and the personal values of employees. Finally, it was concluded that for effective operational performance
the organization needs to align job design to the requisite role and responsibilities for better operations performance,
recruit, select, train, compensate and manage all the employees effectively which would enhance performance, recognize
and reward voluntary contributions and proactive work behaviors which would motivate employees, have various schemes
that enhanced long-term engagement and commitment and that the organization should have the necessary budgetary
support to invest in engagement initiatives.
22
REFERENCES
1.
Acar, A., & Acar, P. (2012). The effects of organizational culture and innovativeness on business performance in
healthcare industry. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 58, 683692.
2.
Acur, N., & Englyst, L. (2006). Proactive Assessment of Strategy Formulation Processes-how to ensure quality in
process and outcome. Int. J. of Operations & Production Management. 26, 63-78.
3.
Aluko, O. (2003). The impact of culture on organizational performance in selected textile firms in Nigeria. Nordic
Journal of African Studies. 12(2), 164179.
4.
Baird, K., Hu, J., & Reeve, R. (2011). The relationships between organizational culture, total quality management
practices and operational performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 31(7),
789814.
5.
Birech, W. (2011). The effect of performance contracting strategy on the Performance of state corporations in the
Energy sector in Kenya. Unpublished MBA Thesis, University of Nairobi.
6.
Blessing, W. (2006). Employee Engagement Report 2006. New Jersey: Princeton Inc.
7.
Buchanan, E., & Boddy, W. (2009). Strategic management and organizational dynamics:
the
challenge
of
choice.
of
Coffman, C. (2000). Is Your Company Bleeding Talent? How to become a true employer
The
Kazmi, A. (2002). Business Policy and Strategic Management, (2nd Ed.), New York:
10. Lundberg, A. (2006). Leverage Complex Event Processing to Improve Operational Performance, Business
Intelligence, 11, 55-65.
11. Malonza, A. (2014). Lean Manufacturing and Operational Performance of Mumias Sugar Company Limited,
Kenya. Unpublished MBA Thesis, University of Nairobi
12. Manimala, J. (2011). Entrepreneurial Heuristics: A Comparison Between High PI (Pioneering-Innovative) and
Low PI Ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 477-504.
13. Ondiek, G., & Kisombe, S. (2012). Lean manufacturing tools and techniques in Industrial
operations.
analysis,
Enterprise
23
16. Rajendra, S., David, B., & Jagdish, N. (2007). Firms of Endearment: The Pursuit of
Purpose
and
Profit.
408,
London;