Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
What is Microwave
Communication
A communication system that utilizes
the radio frequency band spanning 2 to
60 GHz. As per IEEE, electromagnetic
waves between
b t
30 and
d 300 GHz
GH are
called millimeter waves (MMW) instead
of microwaves as their wavelengths are
about 1 to 10mm.
What is Microwave
Communication
Small capacity systems generally
employ the frequencies less than 3 GHz
g capacity
p
y
while medium and large
systems utilize frequencies ranging
from 3 to 15 GHz. Frequencies > 15
GHz are essentially used for short-haul
transmission.
transmission
Microwave Link Design
Line-of-Sight Considerations
Microwave radio communication requires a
clear
l
liline-of-sight
f i ht (LOS) condition
diti
Under normal atmospheric conditions, the
radio horizon is around 30 percent beyond
the optical horizon
Radio LOS takes into account the concept of
Fresnel ellipsoids and their clearance criteria
Line-of-Sight Considerations
Fresnel Zone - Areas of constructive and
destructive interference created when
electromagnetic
l t
ti wave propagation
ti iin ffree space
is reflected (multipath) or diffracted as the wave
intersects obstacles
obstacles. Fresnel zones are specified
employing ordinal numbers that correspond to the
g multiples
p
that
number of half wavelength
represent the difference in radio wave
propagation path from the direct path
The Fresnel Zone must be clear of all
obstructions.
Microwave Link Design
R
Radius
di off th
the fifirstt F
Fresnell zone
R=17.32(x(d-x)/fd)
( ( ) )1/2
where d = distance between antennas (in Km)
R= first Fresnel zone radius in meters
f= frequency in GHz
R
x
y
d
d=x+y
Line-of-Sight Considerations
Typically the first Fresnel zone (N=1) is used to
determine obstruction loss
The direct path between the transmitter and the
receiver needs a clearance above ground of at
least 60% of the radius of the first Fresnel zone to
achieve free space propagation conditions
Earth-radius factor k compensates the refraction
in the atmosphere
Clearance is described as any criterion to ensure
sufficient antenna heights
g
so that, in the worst
case of refraction (for which k is minimum) the
receiver antenna is not placed in the diffraction
region
Microwave Link Design
Effective Earths
Earth s Radius = k * True Earth
Earths
s Radius
True Earths radius= 6371 Km
k=4/3=1.33, standard atmosphere with normally
refracted path (this value should be used whenever
local value is not provided)
Line-of-Sight Considerations
Clearance criteria to be satisfied under
normall propagation
ti conditions
diti
- Clearance of 60% or greater at the
minimum k suggested for the certain path
k 4/3
- Clearance of 100% or greater at k=4/3
- In case of space diversity, the antenna can
have a 60% clearance at k=4/3 plus
allowance for tree growth, buildings (usually
3 meter)
Microwave Link Design
10
11
Frequency
F
Planning
Propagation losses
Branching
B
hi
losses
Other Losses
Link Budget
Fading
Predictions
Quality
and
Availability
Calculations
Microwave Link Design
Rain
attenuation
Diffractionrefraction
l
losses
Multipath
propagation
12
13
14
Propagation Losses
Free-space loss - when the transmitter and
receiver have a clear
clear, unobstructed line
line-ofof
sight
Lfsl=92.45+20log(f)+20log(d)
=92 45+20log(f)+20log(d) [dB]
where f = frequency (GHz)
d = LOS range between antennas (km)
Vegetation attenuation (provision should be
taken for 5 years of vegetation growth)
( )
L=0.2f 0.3R0.6(dB)
f=frequency (MHz)
R=depth of vegetation in meters (for
R 400 )
R<400m)
Microwave Link Design
15
Propagation Losses
Obstacle Loss also
also called Diffraction Loss or Diffraction
Attenuation. One method of calculation is based on knife
edge approximation.
Having an obstacle free 60% of the Fresnel zone gives 0
dB loss
0 dB
0 dB
6dB
Microwave Link Design
16dB
20dB
16
Propagation Losses
Gas absorption
Primarily due to the water vapor and
oxygen in the atmosphere in the radio relay
region The absorption peaks are located
region.The
around 23GHz for water molecules and 50
to 70 GHz for oxygen molecules
molecules.The
The
specific attenuation (dB/Km)is strongly
p
on frequency,
q
y temperature
p
and
dependent
the absolute or relative humidity of the
atmosphere.
Microwave Link Design
17
T=30o
RH=50%
RH
50%
Frequency (GHz)
25
Microwave Link Design
50
18
Propagation Losses
Attenuation due to precipitation
Rain attenuation is the main contributor in the
frequency range used by commercial radio
links
Rain attenuation increases exponentially
y with
rain intensity
The percentage of time for which a given rain
intensity is attained or exceeded is available
for 15 different rain zones covering the entire
earths surface
Microwave Link Design
19
Propagation Losses
The specific attenuation of rain is dependent
on many parameters such as the form and size
of distribution of the raindrops, polarization,
rain intensity and frequency
Horizontal
H i
l polarization
l i i gives
i
more rain
i
attenuation than vertical polarization
Rain attenuation increases with frequency and
becomes a major contributor in the frequency
bands above 10 GHz
The contribution due to rain attenuation is not
included in the link budget and is used only in
the calculation of rain fading
Microwave Link Design
20
Ground Reflection
Reflection on the Earths surface may give
rise
i tto multipath
lti th propagation
ti
The direct ray at the receiver may interfered
with by the ground-reflected ray and the
reflection loss can be significant
Since the refraction properties of the
atmosphere are constantly changing the
reflection loss varies.
Microwave Link Design
21
Ground Reflection
The loss due to reflection on the ground is
dependent on the total reflection coefficient of
the ground and the phase shift
The highest value of signal strength is
obtained for a phase angle of 0o and the
o est value
a ue is
s for
o ap
phase
ase a
angle
geo
of 180
80o
lowest
The reflection coefficient is dependent on the
q
y, g
grazing
g angle
g ((angle
g between the
frequency,
ray beam and the horizontal plane),
polarization and ground properties
Microwave Link Design
22
Ground Reflection
The grazing angle of radio-relay paths is very
small usually less than 1o
It is recommended to avoid ground reflection
by shielding the path against the indirect ray
The contribution resulting from reflection loss
is not automatically included in the link
budget.When reflection cannot be avoided,
g may
y be adjusted
j
by
y including
g
the fade margin
this contribution as additional loss in the link
budget
Microwave Link Design
23
Amax
-20
20
Signal
Strength
(dB)
Amin
0.2
0.6
1.0
Total reflection coefficient
Microwave Link Design
24
Link Budget
The link budget is a calculation involving
the gain and loss factors associated with
the antennas, transmitters, transmission
lines and propagation environment, to
determine the maximum distance at which
a transmitter and receiver can successfully
operate
Microwave Link Design
25
Li k B
Link
Budget
d t
Receiver sensitivity threshold is the signal
level at which the radio runs continuous
errors at a specified bit rate
System gain depends on the modulation
used (2PSK, 4PSK, 8PSK, 16QAM,
32QAM, 64QAM,128QAM,256QAM) and
on the design
g of the radio
26
Link Budget
The gains from the antenna at each end are added to the
system gain (larger antennas provide a higher gain)
gain).
The free space loss of the radio signal is subtracted. The
longer the link the higher the loss
These calculations give the fade margin
In most cases since the same duplex radio setup is
applied to both stations the calculation of the received
signal
g
level is independent
p
of direction
27
Link Budget
Receive Signal Level (RSL)
28
Link Budget
The fade margin is calculated with
respect to the receiver threshold level
for a g
given bit-error rate ((BER).The
)
radio can handle anything that affects
the radio signal within the fade margin
but if it is exceeded, then the link could
go down and therefore become
unavailable
Microwave Link Design
29
Link Budget
The threshold level for BER=10-6 for
microwave equipment used to be about
3dB higher
g
than for BER=10-3.
Consequently the fade margin was 3 dB
larger for BER
BER=10
10-6 than BER
BER=10
10-3. In
new generation microwave radios with
power forward error correction schemes
this difference is 0.5 to 1.5 dB
Microwave Link Design
30
waveguide
Transmitter 2
Splitter
Splitter
Receiver 1
Anntenna Gaiin
Branching
Losses
Proopagation
Lossses
Output
Power (Tx)
Receiver 2
Branching
B
hi
Losses
Received
R
i d
Power (Rx)
Fade Margin
31
F di and
Fading
dF
Fade
d margins
i
Fading is defined as the variation of the
strength of a received radio carrier signal
due to atmospheric changes and/or
ground and water reflections in the
propagation path.Four fading types are
considered while
hile planning links.They
links The are
all dependent on path length and are
estimated as the probability of exceeding
ag
given ((calculated)) fade margin
g
Microwave Link Design
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Frequency planning
The objective of frequency planning is
t assign
to
i frequencies
f
i tto a network
t
k
using as few frequencies as possible
and
d iin a manner such
h th
thatt th
the quality
lit
and availability of the radio link path is
minimally
i i ll affected
ff t d b
by iinterference.
t f
The following aspects are the basic
considerations
id ti
iinvolved
l d iin th
the
assignment of radio frequencies
Microwave Link Design
44
Frequency planning
Determining a frequency band that is suitable
for the specific link (path length, site location,
terrain topography and atmospheric effects)
Prevention of mutual interference such as
i
interference
f
among radio
di frequency
f
channels
h
l
in the actual path, interference to and from
other
ot
e radio
ad o paths,
pat s, interference
te e e ce to a
and
d from
o
satellite communication systems
Correct selection of a frequency band allows
th required
the
i d transmission
t
i i capacity
it while
hil
efficiently utilizing the available radio
frequency
q
y spectrum
p
Microwave Link Design
45
Frequency planning
Assignment of a radio frequency or radio
frequency
q
y channel is the authorization
given by an administration for a radio
station to use a radio frequency or radio
frequency channel under specified
conditions It is created in accordance with
conditions.
the Series F recommendations given by
th ITU-R.
the
ITU R IIn IIndia
di th
the authority
th it is
i WPC
(Wireless Planning & Coordination Wing)
Microwave Link Design
46
Frequency planning
Frequency channel arrangements
The available frequency band is subdivided
into two halves, a lower (go) and an upper
(return) duplex half. The duplex spacing is
always sufficiently large so that the radio
equipment can operate interference
f
free
f
under duplex operation. The width of each
channel
h
ld
depends
d on th
the capacity
it off th
the radio
di
link and the type of modulation used
Microwave Link Design
47
Frequency planning
The most important goal of frequency
planning is to allocate available
channels to the different links in the
network without exceeding the quality
and availability objectives of the
individual links because of radio
interference.
interference
Microwave Link Design
48
Frequency planning
Frequency planning of a few paths can be
carried out manuallyy but,, for larger
g networks,,
it is highly recommended to employ a
software transmission design tool. One such
vendor
d iindependent
d
d
tooll iis P
Pathloss
hl
4
4.0.
0 Thi
This
tool is probably one of the best tools for
complex microwave design
design. It includes North
American and ITU standards, different
diversity schemes, diffraction and reflection
(multipath) analysis, rain effects, interference
analysis etc.
Microwave Link Design
49
Frequency
q
yp
planning
g for different
network topologies
Chain/cascade configuration
f1 HP
f1 VP
f1 HP
50
Ring
g configuration
g
If the ring consisted of an odd number of sites there
would be a conflict of duplex halves and changing the
f
frequency
band
b d would
ld b
be a reliable
li bl alternative
lt
ti
f1 HP
U
f1 VP
f1 VP
f1 HP
U
f1 VP
f1 VP
L
Microwave Link Design
51
Star configuration
g
The link carrying the traffic out of the hub
should use a frequency band other than the
one employed inside the cluster
U
f2 VP
f1 HP
L
f1 HP
f2 VP
f1 HP
U
U
Microwave Link Design
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
Diversity Improvement
Space Diversity
Angle Diversity
Frequency Diversity
Crossband Diversity
Route Diversity
Hybrid Diversity
Media
M di Di
Diversity
it
Microwave Link Design
63
64
Basic Recommendations
Use higher frequency bands for shorter hops and
lower frequency bands for longer hops
Avoid lower frequency bands in urban areas
Use star and hub configurations for smaller
networks and ring configuration for larger networks
In areas with heavy precipitation , if possible, use
frequency bands below 10 GHz.
Use protected systems (1+1) for all important
g
p
y links
and/or high-capacity
Leave enough spare capacity for future expansion
y
of the system
Microwave Link Design
65
66
67
68