Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Midwifery
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/midw
Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Demography and Population Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 3 May 2011
Received in revised form
25 September 2011
Accepted 6 November 2011
Objective: to explain how women who choose to give birth at home perceive and manage the risks
related to childbirth.
Design: a qualitative, methodological approach drawing upon the principles of grounded theory. Data
were gathered by in-depth interviews with women who had given birth at home.
Setting: the study was conducted in Zahedan, the capital of Sistan and Balochestan province in
southeast Iran.
Participants: 21 Baloch women aged 1339 years who had a planned home birth were interviewed.
Nine had been attended by university-educated midwives, eight by trained midwives, and four by
traditional birth attendants.
Findings: concerning perceived risks, women perceived giving birth in hospital to be risky because of
medical interventions, routines and ethical considerations. The perceived risks for home birth were
acute medical conditions. Women made their decision to give birth at home based on existing verbal,
visual, and intuitive information. The following two categories related to risk management were
identied: (1) psychological preparation and (2) medical and logistican preparation. All of the women
relied on their own intuition, their midwife and the sociopsychological support of their families to
transfer them to hospital in the case of complications.
Key conclusions and implications for practice: the women who chose to give birth at home accepted that
there was a risk of complications, but perceived these to be due to fate. Technical risks were considered
to be a consequence of the decision to give birth in hospital, and were perceived to be avoidable.
In addition, the women considered ethical issues as risks that are sometimes more important than
medical complications. Womens perceptions of risk, and the ways in which they prepare to manage
risk, are central issues to help providers and policy makers adjust services to womens expectations in
order to respond to the individuality of each woman.
& 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Women
Home birth
Risk perception
Risk management
Introduction
Globally, there were around 358 000 maternal deaths occurred
in 2008, a 34 % decline from the levels of 1990 (World Health
Organisation, 2010). However, despite this decline, 99% of maternal deaths continued to occur in developing countries (World
Health Organization, 2010). Nearly two-thirds of maternal deaths
n
Correspondence to: Midwifery Department, Nursing and Midwifery School,
Mashahir Square, Zahedan, Sistan and Baluchestan Province, Iran.
E-mail address: zz_moudi@yahoo.com (Z. Moudi).
0266-6138/$ - see front matter & 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.midw.2011.11.001
45
Methods
Approach
This study draws methodologically on a qualitative approach.
This methodological approach may be most simply dened as the
techniques associated with the gathering, analysis, interpretation
and presentation of narrative data and/or information. Qualitative
research strategies are narrative in form, and qualitative (thematic) data are analysed using a variety of inductive and iterative
methods, including the grounded theory (Teddlie and Tashakkori,
2009). In considering the nature of research questions and the
purpose of this study, strategies and principles of grounded
theory were used to provide a logical set of procedures to answer
the research questions and manage the collected data and
evidence. The essence of grounded theory is an inductive
deductive interplay that does not begin with a hypothesis, but
with collecting data and allowing relevant ideas to develop
(McGhee et al., 2007). It is also an endeavour to declare the
anthropocentric nature of sociocultural life and its fundamental
interactional processes, as Chenitz and Swanson observe that the
reality or meaning of situation is created by people and leads to
action and consequences of action (Bassett, 2004). This implies
that a set of social or psychological relationships and process exist
in the world, can be reected in appropriate qualitative data, and
can be captured by grounded theory (Pidgeon and Henwood,
2009, p. 627). In this view, grounded theory can promote a better
and more comprehensive understanding of the decision-making
process and management of the risks of home birth by the
participants.
Sample and recruitment
Twenty-one Baloch women with a history of home birth
participated in the study. They were recruited using qualitative
purposeful sampling, which involves making choices about cases
or setting according to initial prespecied criteria (Pidgeon and
Henwood, 2009, p. 635). In order to recruit women with homebirth experience, the researchers contacted four midwives who
had a private ofce and assisted with home births. To identify
women who had given birth at home without the assistance of
educated or professional midwives, the Maternal Health Ofce
was contacted for the name and telephone number of a trained
birth attendant. This birth attendant recruited two additional
traditional birth attendants. The midwives were informed about
46
the study and asked to explain its purpose to the women they had
assisted during a home birth within the previous four months.
Women with precipitous labour who were forced to give birth at
home were excluded. The midwives asked women for their
consent, and then their telephone numbers were given to the
interviewer. The interviewer contacted the women and asked for
their informed consent to participate in the study. If the women
agreed to participate, a mutually agreeable appointment was
scheduled.
In addition, a theoretical sampling technique was used. In
conjoint with constant comparison, theoretical sampling is the
process whereby the researcher decides what data to collect next
and where to nd them in order to continue to develop theory as it
emerges (Holton, 2007, p. 627). Researchers deliberately seek
participants who had a particular response to experiences or for
whom particular concepts appear signicant (Morse, 2007, p. 240).
The sampling process ceased once comparative data analysis
showed that maximum theoretical variation had been achieved,
namely the saturation rule (Pidgeon and Henwood, 2009, p. 635).
In other words, the researchers were convinced that they understood what they were seeing, it was culturally consistent (Morse,
2007, p. 243), and new ideas would not be formed leading to a
dilemma (Bassett, 2004, p. 64). Twenty-one Baloch women who
had a planned home birth were interviewed. Of these women, nine
were attended by an educated midwife, eight by a trained midwife
and four by a traditional birth attendant. Of the 21 participants,
two women participated with their husbands; 16 participated
with their mother, mother-in-law or sister; and three participated
alone.
Data collection
Data were gathered through in-depth, unstructured interviews
in the participants homes. The interviews lasted between one
and 3 hrs. An unstructured interview was conducted to collect
data on the subject of risk related to home birthwhat did the
women think about probable risks related to childbirth at home?
Further open-ended questions built upon the womens responses
to the questions and further clarications or details of their
responses and the complete narrative; for example, how did
you handle these thoughts? How did your husband react to your
decision? All interviews were conducted in Persian with a slight
Baloch accent by one of the investigators who has a Baloch
background. The interviewees were reminded of their right to
withdraw from the study at any time. All interviews were audio
taped, transcribed verbatim and analysed.
Ethical considerations
Permission to conduct this study was obtained from the Shaheed
Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Ethical Committee and
relevant local authorities in Sistan and Balochestan province. The
investigators obtained the participants permission to perform and
audio tape the interviews. The condentiality of information was
guaranteed, as the name and personal information of the interviewees was not mentioned in the tapes or transcripts. All tapes,
transcripts and information sheets were given special codes and
kept separately to protect the womens anonymity.
Data analysis
In line with grounded theory methodology, data analysis
involved the complementary process of coding and categorising
data, and developing analytical questions and a conceptual model.
Following the transcription of the rst tape, the rst step was
line-by-line reading and open coding of the data, based on the
Findings
Twenty-one Baloch women aged 1339 years were interviewed. They had previously experienced 18 pregnancies. One
of them was illiterate and the education level of the others
ranged from elementary to high school national diploma. Previous
childbirth locations, parity, previous types of childbirth, and the
insurance status of the women are presented in Table 1. Regarding
the risks of home birth, two central themes emerged: perceptions
of risk and management of that risk. In terms of perceived
risks, women perceived giving birth in hospital to be risky
because of medical interventions, routines and ethical considerations. The perceived risks of home birth were acute medical
conditions. Categories related to risk management were as follows: psychological preparation, and medical and logistic
preparation.
Perceptions of risk
Perceptions of medical risks
The Baloch womens statements revealed that they did not
perceive chronic conditions to be a risk factor or a good reason to
visit a doctor. One of the women stated:
They told me, in the birth centre, that I was suffering from
severe anaemia and I should see a doctor; I replied that I have
had this problem for a long time and it is normal for me and
I do not think that something bad would happen to me.
(Interviewee 7, age 25 years).
Later in the interview, Interviewee 7 stated:
In the health centre, I was told: if you have massive bleeding
during labour you will probably die, but I had anaemia during
my previous delivery and you see I did not die. (Interviewee 7,
age 25 years).
In addition, other women did not consider the presence of a
chronic disease to be a reason to give birth in hospital:
She told me that my blood pressure was high (130 mmHg) and
I had to have a hospital birth, but during my last pregnancy,
my blood pressure was also 130 mmHg and I had home birth
without any problem. So, this time I also had a home birth and
refused to go to the hospital. (Interviewee 14, age 29 years).
The women considered acute signs (e.g. loss of consciousness)
to be an indication that they should attend hospital. The women
also considered their previous knowledge about the risk of
47
Religious belief
ion
uit
Int
Presen
ce o
f re
lati
ves
Accessibility
Financial
forecast
nce
ura
Self care
Emotional
supports
Ins
Pre
nat
al
ca
re
Management of
complications
rm
No
ien
ce
wife
Mid
Exp
er
Av
oid
an
ce
Psychological readiness
Risk management
Perceived
risk of
homebirth
Decision to birth at
home
Perceived
risk of
hospital birth
Fig. 1. Conceptual model explaining how women manage the risk of home birth.
Table 1
Background characteristics of participating women
at the time of interviews.
Characteristic
Number
7
7
7
Midwife
Educated midwife
Trained midwife
Traditional birth attendance
9
8
4
Type of delivery
Normal delivery
Caesarean section
Without previous delivery
Parity
First child
Second child
Third or more
Insurance
With insurance
Without insurance
11
3
7
7
5
9
10
11
48
Risk management
The following two categories address the management of the
risks of home birth: mental preparation (psychological readiness),
and medical and logistical preparation.
Psychological readiness
Sociocultural, economic, and spiritual contexts increased the
womens mental readiness for decision-making about home birth.
In line with their statements, the current study determined
that mental or psychological preparation is the main category in
rationalising and accepting home birth. The subcategories of
psychological readiness, and medical and logistical preparation
are shown in Fig. 1.
Norms. The data revealed that most women considered home birth
to be safe as it is the socio-cultural norm in their community. As one
of the women noted:
For Baloch women, risks are not merely medical, but are also
shaped and perceived based on sociocultural structures. In perceiving or constructing the risks of childbirth, the women accentuated the notions of gender and gender-based differences,
amongst other structural factors, in the intensively gendered
society of Iran. A 28-year-old woman addressed the issue in this
way:
Men think that hospitals are safer; they just know that blood
pressure might be low or high, they just know these things.
They do not enter the delivery room and they do not see what
happens there. (Interviewee 15, age 28 years).
From the viewpoint of Baloch women, threats to their beliefs,
schemas, values and dignity are sometimes considered as greater
dangers than medical risks. Several women shared the following
opinion:
The educated midwives and doctors are quarrelling when you
are complaining of pain and there is no one to help you.
(Interviewee 8, age 24 years).
Many women also addressed the issue of Hijab and their
related concerns in the hospital, asserting its meaning for Muslim
Baloch women. A number of women declared their general
concerns about Hijab as follows:
When we go there, they undress us and we are scared without
Hijab. (Interviewee 7, age 25 years).
They further expressed their feelings toward hospitals through
declarations such as:
I am afraid of hospitals, I have stress, and the name of hospital
itself is horrible. (Interviewee 1, age 37 years).
While the data reveal that medical risks are central to
womens health status and should be considered, they also
explain other dimensions of the risks of hospital birth, as
womens signicant beliefs, schemas, values and dignity were
questioned in the hospital. As a nal point, the women always
perceived and rationalised the risks of hospital birth by comparing them with the risks of home birth:
It was my rst childbirth, I had fear, I was afraid of hospitals
more than the risks of home birth. (Interviewee 4, age 21 years).
I wished to have a comfortable and secure childbirth. Therefore, I preferred to stay at home as I found home safer than the
hospital. (Interviewee 9, age 19 years).
49
50
Discussion
This study investigated how childbirth decisions are made by
Baloch women, and how they rationalise and justify their decisions to give birth at home. More specically, this qualitative
study explored Baloch womens constructions and lived
experiences of childbirth in order to develop an understanding
of how they perceive, typify and manage the risks of home birth
in comparison with the risks of hospital birth. This article
primarily calls attention to the point that childbirth does not
occur in a sociocultural vacuum, but is a sociocultural construction (Ishikawa et al., 2002). According to Selin and Stone (2009,
p. xvi), decisions about childbirth regarding place of birth,
position, who receives the baby and even how the mother may
or may not behave during the actual delivery, are usually made by
other people. This study revealed that Baloch women living in
51
Conclusion
The ndings of this qualitative study are signicant in that the
home is not simply a place to live with family, but also serves as a
shelter. It is a safe and amenable place for childbirth that protects
woman from the risks of hospital birth, including the risks of
caesarean section and other interventions, in the context of a
fairly medicalised society. In addition, being at home protects
women from the immorality perspective of hospital care, which is
sometimes a more important risk than the technical aspects of
hospital care. The ndings also showed that women who
expressed an anti-hospital view and chose to give birth at home
accepted the potential complications. However, they attributed
these complications to fate, unlike hospital complications related
to interventions. When women give birth at home after full
preparation, dimensional support and in the presence of a
qualied or educated midwife, documents have shown that
maternal mortality is lower than that for hospital birth
(Ministry of Health and Medical Education, 1996). Maternal
mortality data and research observations have also shown that
most maternal mortality in Iran is associated with women who
use defensive avoidance, rely on past experiences, and are
attended by traditional birth attendants and relatives (Ministry
of Health and Medical Education, 1996).
The limitations of the current study include the fairly small
group of women recruited from Zahedan in southeast Iran, and
the voluntary nature of participation. All interviewed women
were Baloch in terms of ethnicity and Sunni Muslim in terms of
religion. Therefore, the cultural, ethnic and religious contexts of
the participants were not deeply explored. The study may reect
a unique situation within the main city of the province; therefore,
no claims are made regarding the wider generalisability of
ndings, considering that the cities in Sistan and Balochestan
province are highly heterogeneous in terms of socio-economic,
demographic and ethnoreligious criteria. Further studies are
needed to explore the issues raised. It is expected that the audit
trail assists to establish trustworthiness, creditability and transferability of the ndings and the key implications developed.
Notwithstanding these limitations, the study ndings offer valuable insight into the lived experiences and socioculturally constructed reality of childbirth and modes of childbirth among
Iranian Baloch women. Given the limited body of evidence and
information concerning childbirth in Iran, the ndings of this
study may be valuable to other researchers in light of the recent
endeavours to explore the process of childbirth through globally
and culturally diverse perspectives, namely childbirth across
52
cultures (Selin and Stone, 2009). Finally, the multi- and transdisciplinary approach used in this study seems to offer a valuable
contribution to understanding the process of decision-making
and potential ambivalences that surround the rationalisation and
choice of mode of childbirth in communities with a traditional
and religious perspective. Furthermore, this study provides some
evidence to suggest that future scholars should be encouraged to
consider qualitative enquiry in understanding decision-making
and the ways of knowing about and managing the risks of home
birth.
References
Bassett, C., 2004. Qualitative Research in Health Care. Whurr Publisher Ltd.London.
Berry, N.S., 2006. Kaqchikel midwives, homebirth, and emergency obstetric
referral in Guatemala: contextualizing the choice to stay at home. Social
Science and Medicine 62, 19581969.
Bourdieu, P., 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
Catling-Paull, C., Dahlen, H., Homer, C.C.S.E., 2010. Multiparous womens condence to have a publicly-funded homebirth: a qualitative study. Women and
Birth 24, 122128.
Chan, Z.C.Y., 2009. Psychology of decision-making: 6Rs for qualitative research
methodological development. In: Murphy, D., Longo, D. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of
Psychology of Decision Making. , Nova Science Publishers, New York.
Cockerham, W.C., 2007. Social Causes of Health and Disease. Polity Press,
Cambridge.
Creyer, E.H., Kozup, J.C., 2003. An examination of the relationships between coping
styles, task-related affect, and the desire for decision assistance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 90, 3749.
Dahlen, H., 2010. Undone by fears? Deluded by trust? Midwifery 26, 156162
Donnay, F., 2000. Maternal survival in developing countries: what has been done,
what can be achieved in the next decade? International Journal of Gynecology
and Obstetrics 70, 8997.
Duong, D.V., Binns, C.W., Lee, A.H., 2004. Utilization of delivery services at the
primary health care level in rural Vietnam. Social Science and Medicine
59, 25852595.
East, R., Wright, M., Vanhuele, V., 2008. Consumer Behaviour. Sage, London.
El-Nemer, A., Downe, S., Small, N., 2006. She would help me from the heart: an
ethnography of Egyptian women in labour. Social Science and Medicine
62, 8192.
Gabrysch, S., Campbell, O.M., 2009. Still too far to walk: literature review of the
determinants of delivery service use. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 9:34 /http://
www.biomedcentral.com/14712393/9/34/S (last accessed July 2011).
Gibbs, G., 2007. Analyzing Qualitative Data. Sage, Los Angeles, CA.
Gutnik, L.A., Hakimzada, A.F., Yoskowitz, N.A., Patel, V.L., 2006. The role of emotion
in decision-making: a cognitive neuroeconomic approach toward understanding sexual risk behavior. Journal of Biomedical Information 39, 720736.
Holton, J.A., 2007. The coding process and its challenges. In: Bryant, A., Chatmaz, K.
(Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory.Sage, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 265289.
Integrated Management Evaluation System, 1994. Maternal Program Index.
Ministry of Health & Medical Education of Iran. Unpublished data.
Ishikawa, N., Simon, K., Porter, J.D.H., 2002. Factor affecting the choice of delivery
site and incorporation of traditional birth customs in a refugee camp, Thailand.
International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 78, 5557.
Jomeen, J., 2010. Choice, Control and Contemporary Childbirth. Understanding
Through Womens Stories. Radcliffe Publishing, Oxford.
Jordan, R.G., Murphy, P.A., 2009. Risk assessment and risk distortion: nding the
balance. Journal of Midwifery and Womens Health 54, 191200.
Kanti, P.B., Rumsey, D.J., 2002. Utilization of health facilities and trained birth
attendants for childbirth in rural Bangladesh: an empirical study. Social
Science and Medicine 54, 17551765.
Lindgren, H.E., Rsdestad, I.J., Kyllike, C., et al., 2010. Perception of risk and risk
management among 735 women who opted for a home birth. Midwifery
26, 163172.
Lindgren, H., Hildingesson, I., Radestan, I., 2006. A Swedish interview study:
parents assessment of risks in home births. Midwifery 22, 1522.
McGhee, G., Marland, G.R., Atkinson, J., 2007. Grounded theory research: literature
reviewing and reexivity. Journal of Advanced Nursing 60, 334341.
MacKenzie Bryers, H., Van Teijlingen, E., 2010. Risk, theory, social and medical
models: a critical analysis of the concept of risk in maternity care. Midwifery
26, 488496.
Malekafzali, H., 2009. Primary health care in the rural area of the Islamic Republic
of Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Health 38, 6970.
Maternal Health Ofce, 2011. Maternal Health Index. Zahedan. Unpublished data.
Ministry of Health and Medical Education, 1996. National Maternal Mortality
Surveillance System. Tandis, Iran.
Mitchell, M., 2010. Risk, pregnancy and complementary and alternative medicine.
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice 16, 109113.
Morison, S., Percival, P., Hauck, Y., McMurray, A., 1999. Birthing at home: the
resolution of expectations. Midwifery 15, 3239.
Morse, J.M., 2007. Sampling in grounded theory. In: Bryant, A., Charmaz, K. (Eds.),
The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Sage, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 229264.
Murphy, D., Longo, D. (Eds.), 2009. Encyclopedia of Psychology of Decision Making.
Nova Science Publishers, New York.
Nolan, M., 2011. Home Birth: The Politics of Difcult Choices. Routledge, London.
Oltedal, S., Moen, B.E., Klempe, H., Rundmo, T., 2004. Explaining Risk Perception. An
Evaluation of Cultural Theory. C Rotunde publikasjoner, Trondheim. /http://www.
svt.ntnu.no/psy/Torbjorn.Rundmo/Cultural_theory.pdfS (last accessed November
2011).
Pidgeon, N., Henwood, K., 2009. Grounded theory. In: Hardy, M., Hardy, M., Bryman
(Eds.), The Handbook of Data Analysis. Sage, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 625648.
Renn, O., 2004. Perception of risks. Toxicology Letters 149, 405413.
Say, L., Raine, R., 2007. A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal
health care in developing countries: examining the scale of the problem and
the importance of context. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 85,
812818.
Selin, H., Stone, P.K. (Eds.), 2009. Childbirth Across Cultures: Ideas and Practices of
Pregnancy, Childbirth and the Postpartum. Springer, London.
Sjoberg, L., 2000. Factors in risk perception. Risk Analysis 20, 111.
Sjoberg, L., 2004. Explaining Risk Perception. An Evaluation of the Psychometric
Paradigm in Risk Perception Research. C Rotunde publikasjoner, Trondheim. /
http://paul-hadrien.info/backup/LSE/IS%20490/utile/Sjoberg%20Psychometric_
paradigm.pdfS (last accessed November 2011).
Sjoblom, I., Nordstrom, B., Edberg, A.K., 2006. A qualitative study of womens
experiences of home birth in Sweden. Midwifery 22, 348355.
Soane, E., Chmiel, N., 2005. Are risk preferences consistent? The inuence of
decision domain and personality. Personality and Individual Differences 38,
17811791.
Steinberg, S., 1996. Childbearing research: a transcultural review. Social Science
and Medicine 43, 17651784.
Teddlie, C., Tashakkori, A., 2009. Foundations of Mixed Methods Research. Sage,
Los Angeles, CA.
Timmermans, D.R.M., 2005. Prenatal screening and the communication and
perception of risks. International Congress Series 1279, 234243.
Tinoco-Ojanguren, R., Glantz, N.M., Martinez-Hernandez, I., Ovando-Meza, I., 2008.
Risk screening, emergency care, and lay concepts of complications during
pregnancy in Chiapas, Mexico Social Science and Medicine 66, 10571069.
United Nations Population Fund, 2002. Maternal Mortality Update: A Focus on
Emergency Obstetric Care. UNFPA, New York. /http://www.unfpa.org/upload/
lib_pub_le/201_lename_mmupdate-2002.pdfS (last accessed November
2011).
Vedadhir, A., Hosseinejad, F., Sadati, S.M.H., Taghavi, S. Childbearing as a sociocultural problem: a constructionist approach to the cesarean section in Tabriz,
Iran. Iranian Journal of Anthropological Research 1, in press.
Viisainen, K., 2001. Negotiating control and meaning: home birth as a selfconstructed choice in Finland. Social Science and Medicine 52, 11091121.
World Health Organization, 2010. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2008.
World Health Organization, Geneva. /http://www.unfpa.org/webdav/site/glo
bal/shared/documents/publications/2010/trends_matmortality90-08.pdfS
(last accessed November 2011).