He makes the argument that fade means to end but that
is just not true. The resolution we are debating explicitly
says that Christianity will fade in the next 1,000 years. We are the only one offering an actual definition from a credible source which is Merriam Webster which defines fade as to lose strength or freshness or to become weak. Jason and Is only obligation is to prove that Christianity will lose strength or become weaker in the next 1,000 years. Dont let brother Ken just try to change the resolution in the middle of the round. Okay the argument he makes about our science argument is that Christianity has been the largest religion despite technological advancement. We have 4 answers to that. 1. He has conceded the fact that Islam is the fastest growing which means that even with technological advancement Christianity isnt growing as fast as islam 2. One reason Christianity has more people than Islam is because it is approxiamately 500 years older so of course it has more people 3. Another reason Christianity has more people is because of the crusades where Christians literally went to the middle east and murder tens of thousand of people and muslims there. 4. The reason Christianity has more adherents is because of things like colonization. Lets not forget the Spanish inquisition and the fact that Europeans powers went to places like the new world and north America and forced millions of people to convert to Christianity. Lets also not forget slavery and the
colonization of Africa which was a predominantly
muslim population but Europeans not only forced them to convert to Christianity but also took most of them as slaves and made them convert. a. Subpoint to that is that Charles Darwins theory of evolution and the big bang theory wasnt that big during the colonization era so people were forced to believe Christianity Okay so now we will address the 4 points he made that religion need to prosper The first argument is that it must retain cultural continuity. The only reason Christianity has had cultural continutity is because of colonialism. European white supremacists where able to spread English and the Christian language when they took over Africa and Indegenous populations in North America. The second argument is that the Doctrines have to be empirical and there is actual proof that Jesus walked on earth however we have 4 answers to this 1. There is proof that jesus Christ walked the earth but that doesnt mean there is proof that he was divine of performed the miracles. Christianity isnt just about Jesuss existence but about the faith that he was the son of God. 2. Muslims even believe that Jesus existed so that not a reason to belive in Christianity
3. There is proof that Muhamed was on earth so even if
he wins this argument it doesnt make Christianity any better than islam 4. There is also proof that Buddha whos real name was Siddartha Gautama was on earth but that doesnt mean we should be Buddhist The third argument is that a religion can be strict but not to strict and then he makes a comparison that Islam is very very strict and gives cherry picked examples of muslim terrorists. We have answers to this. 1. Thats just very islamophobic. 2. The bible is just as strict. The bible says you should be stoned to death for blaspheming or cursing, for adultry, for a woman who looses her virginity before marriage, for worshipping other gods, for disoberying your parent, or for cursing the king. Thats right kids, if you parent tell you to clean your room and you dont do it the bible says you should be stoned. http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/stonin g.html 3. Also terrorist arent muslims, the people in ISIS have said on several occasions that they cherry pick parts of the Quran for their agenda and propaganda. 4. There have and are currently extreme forms of Christianity too. Lets not forget the crusades when Christians did the same exact thing that terrorists are doing right now. And the fourth argument he makes is that a religion should have an authority and jesus is the authority. The only argument we have is that that is nonunique to
Christianity because Muslims have authority too thats
Muhammed, and Buddhists have authority to that Buddha.