Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
leadership role as Chair of the ASEAN, Non-aligned Movement (NAM) and Organization of
Islamic Conference (OIC); participating actively and meaningfully in the United Nations,
especially in the efforts to end injustice and oppression, and to uphold international law; and
lastly projecting Malaysia as a leading example of a tolerant and progressive Islamic nation
(Ministry of Foreign Affairs Malaysia, 2016).
Malaysias Pragmatism
According to the given principals of Malaysias foreign policy, it reflected the pragmatic way of
shaping its foreign policy in order to gain Malaysias best interest. As Datuk Seri Anifah Aman
mentioned on the dynamic of Malaysias foreign policy that the status quo requires Malaysia to
implement its foreign policy initiatives and make it a realization in order to remain relevant and
necessary in response to changing regional dynamics and the recessionary global economy,
Anifah said that this will enable the country to continue building on its good relations with
strategic partners and to have more focused relations with key countries (Divakaran, 2016). To
assure its chairmanship role in ASEAN, Malaysia has also been promoting the idea of
strengthening ASEANs internal institutions, particularly by the ASEAN Secretariat. Moreover,
Malaysia has launched the idea of AEC 2025, which builds upon ASEANs earlier idea of a
single market and production base extending it further to include sustainable economic
development (Das, 2015). However, the chairmanship failed to meet its expected target of further
negotiation on the status of South China Sea, Malaysia was expecting to gain statements on the
South China Sea during its April Summit and ASEAN Foreign Ministers Meeting in August, yet
they could not secure a joint declaration for the ASEAN Defense Ministers Meeting in
November. Nonetheless the failure of joint declaration could not solemnly be pinpointed on
Malaysias chairmanship but also on the mechanism of ASEAN itself, the ASEAN Dispute
Settlement Mechanism has been claimed as slow and redundant since it is subject to parties
consent on such measures; an opposed party can thus prevent the ASEAN High Council from
being formed (Nguyen, 2015).
As a state Malaysias foreign policy really portrayed the domestics tendencies in Malaysia,
starting from the pragmatic approach of foreign policy pairing it up with economic preferences in
fostering economic environment for the other ASEAN member states as how the agenda will be
fruitful for Malaysia and furthering ASEAN economic integration. Although due to this blunt
tendency and its current chairmanship position it is only fair to question where Malaysia will
position itself in between the Trans Pacific Partnership and Regional Comprehensive Economic
Partnership, its back and forth reaction signaled others that Malaysia wanted the best of both
world Malaysias, considering that Malaysias membership in the TPP does not imply that she is
shifting away from China and moving closer to the United States. Much like Singapore,
Malaysia will spread both its wings, courting the United States and China; extending concessions
to both in equal measure or as opportunities arise, regardless of their source (Nambiar, 2016).
Where does Malaysia stand now cannot be easily defined, as we can see Malaysia stands for
itself, despite of its current Chairmanship Malaysia is utilizing its position to gain what is needed
for the country. Moreover, Malaysia juggles over the influence of superpowers out of its strategic
means. Future steps are being observed by many, as Malaysia is heading either the TPP or RCEP
and her decision will affect the dynamic of the region.