Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Esperac
ion,
Angelic
a Marie
Suggested answer:
Yes, the common carrier is liable. The bag is considered a deposit after
proper notice was given to the driver. At that moment, the carrier became a
depositary thus liable for the loss of property caused by strangers.
Alternative answer:
No, the carrier cannot be made liable since the bag was never formally
turned over to the driver. Hence, the driver was not required to observe
extraordinary diligence in the transport of the bag.
Suggested answer:
No, the case should prosper. The non-submission of evidence by the plaintiffs
is not fatal to their case since in case of loss of effects of passengers or
death or injuries to passengers, the common carrier is presumed to be at
fault. Fault or negligence is presumed in these cases and the court need not
make an express finding of such.
Suggested answer:
Under the doctrine of inscrutable fault, where fault is established but it
cannot be determined which of the two vessels were at fault, both shall be
deemed to have been at fault.
Suggested answer:
Under the doctrine of limited liability the exclusively real and hypothecary
nature of maritime law operates to limit the liability of the shipowner to the
value of vessel, earned freightage and proceeds of the insurance. However,
such doctrine does not apply if the shipowner and the captain are guilty of
negligence.