Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
EDITED BY
REINHARD STROHM
AND
BONNIE J. BLACKBURN
?ART
OXFORD
UNIVERSITY PRESS
cno
VII
MUSIC THEORY AND MUSICAL
THINKING AFTER 1450
By BONNIE J. BLACKBURN
INTRODUCTION
THE
' On the problein that Boethius left to posterity in his delicately balanced claim for the
superiority of the sensus intellectus, while not neglecting the importance of the sensus auditus,
see Klaus-Jfirgen Sachs, 'Boethius and the Judgement of the Ears: A Hidden Challenge
in Medieval and Renaissance Music', in Charles Burnett, Michael Fend, and Penelope Gouk
(eds.), The Second Sense: Studies in Hearing and Musical Judgement from Antiquity to the Seventeenth Century (Warburg Institute Surveys and Texts, 22; London, 1991), 169-98, and also
John Caldwell's article in the same volume, 'The Concept of Musical Judgement in Late Antiquity', 161-8.
2 So at least it appeared to Jean Perreal, who placed Music in the company of Grammar,
Logic, and Rhetoric in his fresco of the Liberal Arts at Le Puy, painted c.1500; it has been suggested that the figure of Tubal-Cain is based on Josquin. See Edward E. Lowinsky, 'Helmuth
Osthoff's Josquin Monograph', in id., Music in the Culture of the Renaissance and Other Essays,
ed. Bonnie J. Blackburn, 2 vols. (Chicago, 1989), ii. 531-4 at 531-2.
302
musica practica; some were at home in both. The last quarter of the
century and the first decades of the next saw an explosion in writings
about music. Italy was the main site, although only three of the six
major theorists were native Italians.' The hot-headed Spaniard Bartolome Ramos de Pareja published his Musica practica in Bologna in
1482. In it he took on the whole musical establishment, from Guido
d'Arezzo, through Marchetto of Padua, down to his own contemporaries: Johannes Tinctoris, a Walloon who spent the major part of his
career at the Neapolitan court, and John Hothby, the English
Carmelite who taught music at Lucca Cathedral for the last twenty
years of his life. Niccolo Burzio violently attacked Ramos, who was
defended in turn by the most mordant tongue of all, that of his pupil
Giovanni Spataro, whose own running controversy with Franchino
Gaffurio erupted into print in 1520. In this flurry of treatises and
counter-treatises, where serious musical arguments are mingled with
ad hominem attacks, the burning musical questions of the day were
aired. Among these were the recovery of ancient Greek writings on
music and their relevance to contemporary practice (Gaffurio,
Hothby), the dissatisfaction with Pythagorean intonation as the basis
of the tuning system (Ramos, Gaffurio), the problem of rationalizing
the existence of sharps, flats, and microtones outside the Guidonian
system (Spanish theorists, Hothby, Aaron), the applicability of the
modal system to polyphony (Tinctoris, Aaron), and the nature of
music itself, especially as revealed in the changing concept of consonance and dissonance and the emergence of harmony as a technical
musical concept (Tinctoris). All these questions were crucial to the
future of music.'
In the fifteenth century, music reached out to other disciplines. Poets
were just as interested as musicians were in the fabled effects of ancient
Greek music, and when they declaimed their verses to musical accompaniment they saw themselves as imitating the Greeks. Artists envied
3 All the proponents were then living in Italy; owing to loss of sources we know little
about music theory in England and especially in France; apart from Tinctoris, Georg
Erber's notes on proportions, made in Paris c.1460, are a notable exception; see Renate
Federhofer-Konigs,
Beitrag zur Proportionenlehre in der zweiten Halfte des 15. Jahrhunderts', Studia musicologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 11 (1960), 145-57. In England
we have a rare witness in John Tucke's notebook, which reflects his personal interest in quite
abstruse aspects of musical notation but is not likely to reflect the normal studies of an aspiring theorist. See Ronald Woodley, John Tucke: A Case Study in Early Tudor Music Theory
(Oxford, 1993).
On the new directions in music theory of the 15th c., see Edward E. Lowinsky, 'Music
of the Renaissance as viewed by Renaissance Musicians', in Bernard O'Kelly (ed.), The
Renaissance Image of Man and the World (Columbus, Ohio, 1966), 129-77, reps. in Lowinsky,
Music in the Culture of the Renaissance, i. 87-105, and id., 'The Concept of Physical and Musical
Space in the Renaissance', in Papers of the American Musicological Society, Annual Meeting,
1941, ed. Gustave Reese (n.p., 1946), 57-84; rev. repr. in Music in the Culture of the Renaissance,
i. 6-18.
303
304
305
306
1450
307
Towards the end of the century we begin to find the more systematic approach to music theory that characterizes Tinctoris's and
Gaffurio's writings. Adam von Fulda's Musica of 1490 reflects his
humanistic education with its citations of ancient authors, but also an
awareness of the current state of music, and not just in Germany.' He
praises Innocent VIII for his patronage of musicians, following in the
footsteps of his predecessors, and also kings, princes, prelates, and
private citizens throughout Italy, France, and Germany (the order is
noteworthy, but there is an ulterior motive: Adam had just become a
singer at the court of Frederick the Wise of Saxony). To the inventors
of music in antiquity he adds Gregory, Isidore, Guido, Oddo, Berno,
and Johannes de Muris. Then he mentions 'the most learned' Guillaume Dufay and Antoine Busnoys, as models to be imitated.' The
former he credits with the extension of the range three notes beneath
I" and three above e la. And why, asks Adam, should music, which
belongs to the quadrivium and rejoices in measure, number, and proportion, which have no limit, not apply that same proportion to
harmonic voices and extend into infinity? The treatise is a curious
mixture of straightforward instruction, frequently taken directly from
medieval theorists (especially Guido, Johannes, and 'Odd in Enchiriade'), ancient dicta, and personal observations. For example, ch. 15 of
Book II begins with Guido's characterization of modal ethos, followed
by a line from Ovid matching song to affect, from which he moves to
the plagal and authentic ranges according to Berno and Oddo. Next
he notes that originally there were only four modes, similar to the four
seasons, as the Psalmist seems to indicate when he says `psallite Deo
nostro, psallite, psallite regi nostro, psallite' (Ps. 46: 7 Vulg.). This
passage comes straight from Johannes Votto' or Affligemensis, whose
twelfth-century treatise De musical' continues to be a mainstay of
music theory well into the sixteenth century, when he is sometimes
cited as 'Johannes Pontifex', a confusion with the learned French Pope
John XXII. But, continues Adam, since moderns are pleased by
variety, in polyphony they are not bound to single modes but may use
the paired modes, or one mode of the ancients. He does not discuss
monochord are also given in Conrad's third treatise, Novellus musicae artis tractatus (ibid.
207-11). On this instrument see Karl-Werner Giimpel, 'Das Tastenmonochord Conrads von
Zabern', Archly far Musikwissenschaft, 12 (1955), 143-66.
17 The treatise is in GS iii. 329-81. The unique source, in Strasburg, Bibliotheque de
la Ville,
was destroyed by fire in 1870.
It circa meam aetatem doctissimi Wilhelmus Duffay, ac Antonius de Busna, quorum & nos
sequaces esse volumus, verbis scilicet, utinam & factis' (ibid. 341).
9 Ed. J. Smits van Waesberghe (CSM 1; Rome, 1950), 76. Translated in Hucbald, Guido, and
John on Music, trans. Warren Babb, ed. Claude V. Palisca (Music Theory Translation Series; New
Haven and London, 1978).
308
SPANISH THEORY
309
all the notes of the gamut could be covered by the soft and hard hexachords, the natural hexachord was considered superfluous. And, since
it was necessary only to know where the semitone mifa occurred in
the scale, the whole cumbersome system of mutations fell by the
wayside. Ornithoparchus still describes Guido's syllables and the three
interlocking hexachordal properties, soft, natural, and hard, but when
it comes to mutation, his explanation is so brief that novice singers
would have been mystified. Significantly, there are none of the detailed
lists of where mutations are made that we find in Tinctoris and Gaffurio and later Italian theorists.
SPANISH THEORY
310
SPANISH THEORY
311
312
SPANISH THEORY
313
314
polyphony. (None of the rules is tied to a specific mode.) His rules and
exceptions may be paraphrased as follows:41
Rule 1. Every melody that rises from f to b or rises to b and
returns
to f is sung with B,, to avoid a tritone. He notes that some
disregard
this rule when the word has two consecutive vowels, for example in the
introits De ventre matris meae at meae (LU 1499) and
Scio cui credidi
at cui (LU 1344). He disagrees, saying that Ai is sung there becaus
e of
the first exception to the first rule:
First exception: If the passage coincides with a clausula on the note
a at the end of a word, Bil is sung, even if a tritone ensues:
Ba - pti - zat
Thus the well-known introit Gaudeamus will be sung with Bq. Other
theorists, beginning with Estevan, also specify 134, but Martinez is the
only one who cites the verbal structure as the reason.
Second exception: If a melody rises to b but before descending to f
touches g and/or a four or more times, BEI is sung:
De-us me-us
r.
es
to
ne dis - ce - das
This rule too goes back at least to Estevan, who requires only two
gs or as.
Third exception: If a melody rises from g or a to b, then descends to
a clausula where f should be sharpened, .13is sung:
Ne
a - ver
tas
>x<
fa - ci - em
SPANISH THEORY
315
r.11
0 vir - go
N. 'I -
316
317
318
writers') and merely presents his division as 'very easy' for singers to
understand. His pupil Giovanni Spataro stressed that this tuning was
to be used for musica activa, or performance, whereas Pythagorean
intonation remained the basis of musica theorica.' Ramos's proposal
was put on a firmer theoretical footing in Lodovico Fogliano's Musica
theorica of 1529, and by mid-century the general consensus among
Italian theorists was that the tuning system in practical use was indeed
Ptolemy's syntonic diatonic.'
In line with his emphasis on practical music, Ramos included interesting chapters on musical instruments, musica ficta, counterpoint
(including an early description of fuga, or imitation), mensuration
(reviewing different fifteenth-century usages of signs), and canonic
inscriptions, mentioning some of his own compositions, now lost.
Throughout the treatise he takes issue with many contemporary theorists, in often quite intemperate language. Ramos's broadsides inaugurated a new direction in music theory: theory as polemic, directed
not against time-honoured verities but authors themselves. Those
moved to respond were John Hothby, Niccolo Burzio, and Franchino
Gaffurio. Spataro took up the defence of his master, in equally polemical terms, in a treatise directed against Burzio and a famous running
controversy with Gaffurio, a pamphlet war that did not end with the
latter's death in 1522.'
JOHN HOTHBY
JOHN HOTHBY
319
was
Among the more measured responses to Ramos's polemics
ling
travel
after
who,
that of John Hothby, the English Carmelite friar
he
e
wher
in France, Germany, and Spain, had settled in Lucca,
1467
was chaplain and `magiscolus' at the Cathedral of St Martin from
in
os,
Ram
to
letter
a
of
to his death in 1487.56 It took the form
a
Music
the
from
which he quotes and refutes fourteen passages
ct,
practica.57 A major part of the work is given over to the corre
os's
Pythagorean, division of the monochord, opposing Ram
the
to
space
le
derab
more practical one. Hothby also devotes consi
by
n
refutation of Ramos's proposal to do away with solmizatio
out
substituting the syllables psal-li-tur per vo-ces is-tas, pointing
r
tur-pe
les,
syllab
ent
differ
with
that the mifa semitone must be sung
serve
must
is
le
syllab
and is-tas, but also ces-vo (i.e. Ai,G), and that the
ss
for all Bs, whether flat or natural. He criticizes Ramos on the premi
in
tage
of the medieval system, refusing to recognize any advan
he
ones,
semit
three
the
of
ion
quest
Ramos's innovations. As to the
incom
'an
ing
mean
defends Marchetto's use of the term (semitone
that
lains
plete tone'), but not its application. Furthermore he comp
ones
Ramos has misunderstood him: he does not claim that the semit
but
sizes
ent
differ
of
are
ore
belong to different genera and theref
the
of
y
qualit
the
they are called soft, hard, and natural according to
called a
B they contain, just as a house built of white stones is
white house.
ed at
Hothby had special cause (and also justification) to be offend
Fol.
works
his
of
Ramos's remarks because he had not published any
but
lowing Horace's injunction, he had kept them backnot just nine,
tio, is
twenty years. What Ramos must have seen, he says in his Excita
would
he
what
from
ent
notes taken down by his students, far differ
was installed as chaplain of
se Hothby, who was licensed to lecture in sacred theology,
ion of teaching plainchant
obligat
express
the
with
1467,
Feb.
in
s
Regulu
St
of
the altar
and chapter of the cathecanons
the
1469
In
Martin.
St
of
clerics
and
and polyphony to priests
that he also taught
noting
salary,
's
Hothby
to
ute
dral petitioned the city council to contrib
by Henry VII; he died there in
grammar and arithmetic. In 1486 he was called back to England
is derived from his treatises and
Nov. 1487. The only firm knowledge we have of Hothby's career
have been published by Luigi
which
of
most
,
archives
city
and
l
documents in the Lucca cathedra
letter to Lorenzo de' Medici
a
,
addition
In
1879).
Nerici, Storia della musica in Lucca (Lucca,
a favour on behalf of a friend,
ing
(request
e
Florenc
in
been
had
he
that
s
suggest
1469
Nov.
17
of
have always regarded me'); see
he praises Lorenzo's 'great humanity, with which I know you
that Hothby studied at Oxford
belief
The
193.
Ramos',
and
Seay, 'Florence: The City of Hothby
hical Register of the University
in 1435 rests on a mistaken identity: see A. B. Emden, A Biograp
be the John Otteby, a Carmelite
of Oxford to A.D. 1500, 3 vols. (Oxford, 1957-9), li. 969. He may
pton in 1451 (ibid. 1409).
Northam
in
on
subdeac
a
d
ordaine
was
who
,
convent
in the Oxford
published by Albert Seay in
been
has
nem
refutatio
per
artis
musicae
57 The Excitatio quaedam
17-57. This edition (which
1964),
Rome,
10;
(CSM
Tres tractatuli contra Bartholomeum Ramum
includes the Dialogus Johannis
must be used with caution: there are many misreadings) also
d cleric, only the latter of which
Octobi anglici in ante musica and a letter in Italian to an unname
s.
deals with Ramos's criticism
320
58 Traeterea opera mea nec to nec alius umquam vidisti, fortasse tamen quae a meis discipulis excepta sunt et valde diversa' (Tres tractatuli, 55). (This explains the Italian phonetic
spelling `Fich' of the English composer Thick; see Reinhard Strohm, Music in Late Medieval
Bruges (Oxford, 1985), 123.)
5 It confirms Gilbert Reaney's thesis that many of these treatises derive from lecture notes;
see 'The Manuscript Transmission of Hothby's Theoretical Works', in Michael D. Grace (ed.),
A Festschrift for Albert Seay (Colorado Springs, Colo., 1982), 21-31. Reaney traces the network
of relations between Hothby and Johannes Gallicus (Hothby calls him 'Johannes Legiensis',
from the diocese of Liege [not `Legrense', a misreading by Seay]; they were fellow students at
Pavia), Niccolo Burzio (Gallicus' student), and Johannes Bonadies (a fellow Carmelite, who
copied nine of Hothby's compositions into the Faenza Codex, and was the teacher of Gaffurio), and the copyists of some of Hothby's treatises, one of whom, Matheus de Testadraconibus,
expressly says that he studied with Hothby in Lucca in 1471. Reaney gives an overview of
Hothby's treatises in 'The Musical Theory of John Hothby', Revue beige de musicologie, 42
(1988), 119-33.
60 Five different versions of his treatise have been edited by Reaney in Hothby, Opera omnia
de musica mensurabili (CSM 31; Neuhausen-Stuttgart, 1983).
Hothby's nine musical works (all unica) have been edited by Albert Seay, The Musical Works
of John Hothby (CMM 33; n.p.: American Institute of Musicology, 1964). In some versions of
his treatises one sign is placed within another.
JOHN HOTHBY
321
322
Secondo
F
D
C
G
Terzo
G
F
D
C
A
From this it can be seen that Hothby has named all the flat notes in
the second order by the next lower natural note: B6, for example, is 'A
del secondo ordine'. The reason must stem from his conception of the
scale in terms of the keyboard, since Bi,s fall between A and A#.66
Accidentals are described in terms of the letter B 'painted' in three different ways: b diritto, or straight square b, which has the form of the
modern natural sign; b rotondo, or round b, the flat; and
quadro
iacente, slanting square b, the sharp. The notes of the gamut (le voci
famose') are classified according to function: principe (B and E in the
first order), comite (C and F in the first order), and demostratore (A,
D, and G in the first order). While one might understand these as
princes, counts, and demonstrators, they make better sense as leaders
(they are leading-notes), followers, and pointers. In imagery recalling
that of Fortune's wheel, leaders of the first order become followers
with respect to the third order (A4B, D#E). The leaders and followers govern all the `nomi officiali' in their `schiera', that is, the syllables in the hexachord. Only after this point does Hothby start using
the Guidonian syllables: leaders are mi, followers are fa. He reinforces
the notion of function when he says that mi should be pronounced
66
Hothby's conception of the gamut in terms of the keyboard, which has antecedents
in Prosdocimo, is an important point made by Karol Berger in Musica Ficta, esp. 32-7 and
42-3.
JOHN HOTHBY
323
`cordially and very sharp, because there is a large space between re and
mi, but fa should be pronounced moderately, because between mi and
fa there is less space than half the other'; they are 'closely entwined,
as good companions should be'.67 (This narrow leading-note is what
Tinctoris calls a 'chromatic semitone'; it is related to Marchetto of
Padua's diesis, a fifth of a tone.) Mutation is then explained in terms
of the Guidonian hexachords. Adding the hexachords involving flats
and sharps (`schiere promiscue') makes it possible to sing all six syllables on each degree of the gamut.
5. Tractatus quarundam regularum artis musice.' This is Hothby's
most developed treatise. A major component is the division of the
monochorda subject rarely treated by Hothby's time, but central to
his thought since it includes divisions yielding not only his second and
third orders, but also his fourth and fifth orders, not discussed in the
Calliopea. The fourth order is found by dividing the distance between
G and Ai, in half (and from this note generating the remaining notes
as in the first order), the fifth order by dividing the distance between
Git and A in half and generating the rest of the notes similarly. The
notes in these orders are to be shown by the b quadro iacente with a
dot in the centre, 'but up to now', he says, 'they have not been used
either in plainsong or in polyphony'.' In one version of this treatise
he even envisaged a sixth order, splitting the comma into two schismata." His interest in these matters was evidently piqued by reading
Boethius, De institutione musica iii. 8, on Philolaus' division of the
tone, since he uses the same terminology: schisma for half the comma,
and diaschisma for half the minor semitone (however, his preferred
term for the latter was diesis, which Philolaus used for the minor semitone; Hothbyfollowing later theorycalls it limma).
67 `Mi ascendendo debbe essere proferito cordialmente, et molto aciuto, perche intra re et mi
e grande spatio. Ma it fa debbe essere proferito moderatamente, perche intra mi et fa e meno
spatio della meta de laltro. . . . sono strettamente insieme abraciati, si chome debbono essere li
buoni compagni'. Calliopea, ed. McDonald, 25 (Coussemaker, 306-7).
" This is the title in Florence, Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale, MS Pal. 472, fos. 9r-15`. Other
versions go under the titles De musica intervallosa and Ars plane musice; for sources see Seay,
`Hothby', New Grove, viii. 730. It is not yet available in a modern edition. To some extent the
treatise duplicates the Calliopea, which is only in Italian and 'reducta in brevita'.
69 'Tutte le voci del quarto ordine et del quinto debbano essere dipinte per b quadro iacente
con uno puncto in meco, ut puta 1f, a differentia del terzo, benche facilmente possano essere
cogniosciuti per li principi et comiti delli ordini principali, conciosia cosa the sempre cadeno
intra loro. Ma infino a qui mai sono stati dipincti, ne in legale ne in chorale'; Florence, Pal. 472,
fo. 13".
70 `Chisma minor fit inter A secundi et A sexti, quequidem A sexti ordinis habetur divisionem
comatis in duas partes equales'; ibid., fo. 10". This would not have produced an equal temperament, since the tone remains at 9:8 and the minor semitones BC and EF at 256:243, but it
would have come very close to it: whereas the exact half of a 9:8 tone is 101.955 cents, the combination of a minor semitone with Hothby's minor and major schisma would yield respectively
101.92 and 101.99 cents.
324
JOHANNES TINCTORIS
325
326
was elected its procurator. Either before or after his period in Orleans
he was, according to his De inventione et usu musicae, master of the
choirboys at Chartres Cathedral.
Had Tinctoris remained in France, he might well have been no more
than a shadowy figure today, owing to the dearth of fifteenth-century
French musical and theoretical sources. But, like many northern
singers, he went south. By the early 1470s he was a singer and chaplain of Ferdinand I (Ferrante), king of Naples, where he spent the
major part of his career. What was probably his first treatise written
at the court, the Proportionale musices, was dedicated to the king, as
was the last of his didactic treatises, the Liber de arte contrapuncti,
completed 11 October 1477. Three treatises and two motets were dedicated to the king's young daughter Beatrice, to whom he probably
taught music. It is not known when he left Ferrante's service; he was
in Rome in 1492 (where a motet of his in honour of Pope Alexander
VI was sung) but was not a member of the papal chapel. He died in
1511, after retiring to Nivelles. He was sufficiently well known to have
merited an entry in Johannes Trithemius' Cathalogus illustrium
virorum Germaniae (1495), where he is called 'doctor of both laws, formerly archicapellanus and cantor of King Ferrante of Naples, a man
very learned in all respects, an outstanding mathematician, a musician
of the highest rank, of a keen mind, skilled in eloquence, [who] has
written and is writing many remarkable works', including 'many
remarkable letters to various personages'.79
Tinctoris was a born teacher. His treatises show the great care he
took to present the material in logical order, with each point illustrated, where feasible, by a musical example. The pedagogical treatises,
written during the 1470s, are found in the following order in a presentation copy:80
79 The full article is translated in Gustave Reese, Music in the Renaissance (New York, 1954;
rev. edn., 1959), 138, who gives an excellent summary of Tinctoris's treatises on pp. 139-49. Only
one of the letters is extant, to Giovanni Marco Cinico; see Ronald Woodley, `Tinctoris's Italian
Translation of the Golden Fleece Statutes: A Text and a (Possible) Context', EMH 8 (1988),
173-244 at 236-44.
80 Valencia, Biblioteca Universitaria, MS 835. The same order is followed in the two other
`collected works' copies, Bologna, Biblioteca Universitaria, MS 2573 (prefaced with the motet
Virgo Dei throno) and Brussels, Bibliotheque Royale, MS II. 4147 (which adds at the end the
Diffinitorium and an incomplete copy of the Complexus). These treatises, originally published
by Coussemaker (iv. 1-200), are now available (with the exception of the Diffinitorium) in Tinctoris, Opera. This edn. must be used with caution, and even more so Seay's translations: 'The
Expositio manus of Johannes Tinctoris', Journal of Music Theory, 9 (1965), 194-232; Concerning the Nature and Propriety of Tones (Colorado College Music Press Translations, 2; Colorado
Springs, Colo., 1967); The Art of Counterpoint (MSD 5; American Institute of Musicology,
1961); and 'The Proportionale musices of Johannes Tinctoris', Journal of Music Theory, 1 (1957),
22-75; rev. in Proportions in music (Proportionale musices) (Colorado College Music Press
Translations, 10; Colorado Springs, Cola, 1979). The Complexus is now available in a new
JOHANNES TINCTORIS
327
Expositio manus
Liber de natura et proprietate tonorum
Tractatus de notis et pausis
Tractatus de regulari valore notarum
Liber imperfectionum notarum musicalium
Tractatus alterationum
Liber de punctis musicalibus
Liber de arte contrapuncti
Proportionale musices
This arrangement does not reflect the order of writing (the book on
modes is dated 6 November 1476, that on counterpoint 11 October
1477; the rest were completed earlier) but a didactic one: the fundamentals of music (the explanation of the Guidonian hand, clefs and
locations of pitches, hexachords, mutation, and intervals), the modes,
mensural notation, counterpoint, and proportions.
A comparison with the order and contents of Ugolino's Declaratio
musicae disciplinae is instructive.' Ugolino divided his treatise into
five books: the fundamentals (musica plana, which also includes a treatment of the modes and a tonary), counterpoint, mensural notation (an
extended gloss on the Libellus cantus mensurabilis), proportions, and
speculative music (an inquiry into the subject of music in decidedly
philosophical terms, acoustics, and mathematical proportions of intervals). Ugolino is firmly rooted in the medieval scholastic tradition:
throughout, the emphasis is on the theoretical aspect of music, with no
mention of composers or compositions. The book on counterpoint
(the shortest), is restricted to note-against-note writing in two parts,
and that on proportions treats only mathematical ratios with reference
to intervals, not to mensuration. Tinctoris has very little interest in
speculative music (aspects of it are treated in his last treatise, De
inventione et usu musicae).' His orientation is not just towards practical music, but to polyphony. The treatises on counterpoint and
edition and translation in On the Dignity and the Effects of Music: Egidius Carlerius, Johannes
Tinctoris, Two Fifteenth-Century Treatises, trans. and ann. J. Donald Cullington, ed. Reinhard
Strohm and J. Donald Cullington (Institute of Advanced Musical Studies Study Texts, 2;
London, 1996).
81 On Ugolino, see above, Ch. 6.
az The complete treatise does not survive; six chapters were published in Naples c.1481-3,
and another five have been recovered in a manuscript in Cambrai. For the former, see Karl
Weinmann, Johannes Tinctoris ( 1445-1511) and sein unbekannter Traktat "De inventione et usu
musicae", ed. Wilhelm Fischer (Tutzing, 1961), for the latter Ronald Woodley, 'The Printing and
Scope of Tinctoris's Fragmentary Treatise De inventione et usu musice', EMH 5 (1985), 239-68,
including an edition of the new chapters. From the latter we discover that the Complexus effectuum musices, omitted from the two presentation copies of Tinctoris's works, was included in a
revised form in the De inventione, where it formed ch. 5 of the first book.
328
JOHANNES TINCTORIS
329
330
331
JOHANNES TINCTORIS
Ex. 7.1. Tinctoris's rules for dissonance illustrated in his Salve martyr virgoque Barbara
Supremum
4.2 J .1)
IBUI .
Tenor
IL
Contratenor
2
1# 0
1)r
7 -ljJ
J
o
E.:
.1
/7"
.r)
r
r
J
U.
(7\
co'
the same rules, but between composition and counterpoint. In composition (res facto) all the voices must obey the rules of counterpoint
(`the law and order of concords') in relation to each other; in singing
super librum the added voices are only required to harmonize properly with the tenor, though Tinctoris prefers the singers to agree
beforehand not to duplicate their counterpoints. Here lie the roots of
the distinction (first discussed specifically by Pietro Aaron in 1516)
between 'simultaneous' conception and successive composition (see
below). For Tinctoris, however, the method by which the result is
achieved is less significant than the result itself. Res facta could equally
well be composed in the successive manner, and then refined, since a
higher degree of harmonic relations is required in order to consider
the composition an opus perfectum et absolutum, as Listenius was to
332
term it in 1537. For this reason I have proposed to call the process
`harmonic composition' rather than 'simultaneous conception'.' Res
facta, the Latin equivalent of 'chose faite' (a term used in literary
sources of the time), denotes a finished work, one that exists apart
from its performance.
For Tinctoris, the music of his day had reached the pinnacle of perfection. The 'new art', ushered in by Dunstable, Dufay, and Binchois,
had blossomed in the works of the 'moderns', Ockeghem, Busnoys,
Regis, and Caron. Yet for all the subtlety and ingenuity of their compositions, they (and 'many other famous composers whom I admire')
`are either wholly ignorant of musical proportions or indicate incorrectly the few that they know', a defect that stems from ignorance of
arithmetic, 'a science without which no one becomes eminent, even in
music, for from its innermost parts all proportion is derived'.93 Hence
the treatise on proportions, undertaken not only to instruct the ignorant but to bring order into a mensural system whose inconsistencies
Tinctoris deplored.' Using mathematics as a model, he regarded the
minim as the basic unit of counting, of equal value in all mensurations. Therefore a breve in perfect tempus, with six minims, was
one-half longer than a breve in imperfect tempus, with four. As a consequence, only notes of equal value could be compared in proportions,
and the relationship could only be indicated (except in the case of coloration) by two figures, the upper one showing the number of notes
in the new section being compared with the number of like notes either
in the previous section or in another voice. Using this method, it was
possible to indicate such abstruse proportions as 17 : 8. The problem
92 This interpretation is argued in Blackburn, 'On Compositional Process'. Because of
changes that take place in the course of composing, it is difficult to determine how a given piece
of music has been composed, unless there are clashes between the upper parts. It flies in the face
of reason to suppose that composers of earlier eras did not conceive the voices to some degree
simultaneously; surely they were able to hear in their heads the sound of twoand not just
twovoices at the same time. Daniel Leech-Wilkinson has proposed that Machaut, in composing his four-part mass, had in mind the chord-progressions, though not the individual voices, at
a very early stage, and that he may even have used a single-stave score as a working tool; see
Machaut's Mass: An Introduction (Oxford, 1990), ch. 3.
9' See the preface to his Proportionale musices, trans. in Strunk, 193-6 (Strunk', 291-3). Tinetoris adds Faugues to the list of great composers in the preface to his Liber de arte contrapuncti
(Strunk, 197-9). On Tinctoris's rhetorical strategies in this treatise, see Ronald Woodley, 'Renaissance Music Theory as Literature: On Reading the Proportionale Musices of Iohannes Tinctoris', Renaissance Studies, 1 (1987), 209-20. See also below, Ch. 8.
94
Musicians of course were long familiar with the proportions governing musical intervals
(see the discussion of musica speculativa in Ch. 6); many theoretical treatises of the 15th c.
include sections explaining proportions in abstract mathematical terms (as, for example, the treatise by Hothby mentioned above). These had been applied to the mensural system since the late
14th c. and were first treated theoretically by Prosdocimo (see Anna Maria Busse Berger, Mensuration and Proportion Signs: Origins and Evolution (Oxford, 1993), esp. ch. 6). Inconsistencies
arose in practice because they were commonly indicated not by ratios but by mensuration signs,
which were subject to varying interpretation.
FRANCHINO GAFFURIO
333
was that this logical system did not fit the mainstream of musical practice at Tinctoris's time. Many other theorists, and most composers,
believed that the central note in the mensural system was not
the minim but the breve, that longs and maximas were aggregations of breves, and semibreves and minims were divisions of
the breve. Their system had the drawback that minims (and semibreves
in the same prolation) could have different lengths. But it also
meant that mensuration signs could be used to indicate proportions.
C followed by 0 meant sesquialtera (3 : 2) between semibreves, C
followed by C sesquialtera between minims. But mensuration signs
were ambiguous: the reversed C, for example, could mean sesquitertia, 4: 3, or proportio dupla, 2: 1. Other aspects of this system to which
Tinctoris objected were the use of signs of major prolation to mean
augmentation (unless an explanatory canon, such as `crescit in triplo',
was added) and signs of minor modus to mean diminution. Dufay
`wondrously erred' in two respects in the 'Qui cum patre' of his Missa
Sancti Antonii in the passage shown in Ex. 7.2: not only did he produce
sesquialtera by equating three perfect breves with two imperfect breves,
he used a sign of modus (03) to indicate diminution. According to
Tinctoris, he should have written 01, to indicate a dupla sesquiquarta
(9 : 4) relation between minims.' All Tinctoris's criticisms of composers in the Proportionale stem from the clash of the two notational
systems.96 Whether by force of his authority (and that of Gaffurio,
who agreed with him in these matters) or a general decline of interest
in mensural complexities, Tinctoris's reforms prevailed.'
FRANCHINO GAFFURIO AND MUSICAL HUMANISM
334
Ex. 7.2. Dufay, 'Qui cum patre' from Missa Sancti Anthonii. Trent, Museo
Provinciale d'Arte, Castello del Buon Consiglio, MS 90, fos. 401"--402r
03111111 0
11.7
'o
JJJ
ll
FRANCHINO GAFFURIO
335
336
GUILIELMUS MONACHUS
337
110
338
PIETRO AARON
339
340
341
The very same numbers that cause sounds to have that concinnitas, pleasing
to the ears, can also fill the eyes and mind with wondrous delight. From musicians therefore who have already examined such numbers thoroughly, or from
those objects in which Nature has displayed some evident and noble quality,
the whole method of outlining is derived.
Thus did Leon Battista Alberti introduce the method of proportioning private buildings in his De re aedificatoria of about 1450, first
printed in 1486.1' He went on to give a thumbnail sketch of the
phenomenon of sound and the intervals produced by ratios of
string lengths, using the terms diapentelsesquialtera, diatessaronl
sesquitertia, diapason, diapason diapente, disdiapason, and tonusl
sesquioctavus. Architects, he says, employ these numbers in pairs when
laying out flat areas, but in threes when designing three-dimensional
space, where height should be proportioned harmoniously to length
and width. For Alberti, as for generations after him, that which was
true was beautiful: he defines beauty as 'that reasoned harmony of all
the parts within a body, so that nothing may be added, taken away, or
altered, but for the worse'.124 That this notion was connected above all
122 Only nine of Aaron's letters have survived, but much of Spataro's side of the correspondence has been preserved. See Correspondence of Renaissance Musicians.
123 I quote from On the Art of Building in Ten Books, trans. Joseph Rykwert, Neil Leach,
and
Robert Tavernor (Cambridge, Mass., and London, 1991), 305 (from bk. ix, ch. 5). Christine
Smith is sceptical of a musical theoretical interpretation of Alberti's use of concinnitas, believing that his notion of harmony reflects heard music, and relates it therefore to rhetoric; see Architecture in the Culture of Early Humanism: Ethics, Aesthetics, and Eloquence, 1400-1470 (New
York, 1992), 89, 91-4. While not denying this aspect, it seems to me that Alberti was knowledgeable enough to know that pleasing harmonies were based on simple mathematical
ratiosthe very ones he names in this passage.
124 On the Art of Building, 156 (bk. vi, ch. 2). The fundamental study of this
idea, as expressed
in architecture, is Rudolf Wittkower, Architectural Principles in the Age of Humanism (2nd edn.,
London, 1952). Michael Baxandall, Painting and Experience in Fifteenth Century Italy (Oxford,
1972) offers valuable insights into the role of mathematics in art, especially the practical application of proportions using the 'Rule of Three' (pp. 86-102). He also makes a highly interesting comparison between the technical terms used in Domenico da Piacenza's treatise on the art
of dancingaere, maniera, misura, misura di terreno, memoriaand contemporary painting (pp.
77-81).
342
343
reason.) The case was more easily arguable for architects than for
painters. However, by drawing together the cosmological speculations
about the relationship between the harmony of the spheres and the
harmony of the human body and soulmusica mundana and musica
humanathe Renaissance fused, in the words of Erwin Panofsky, 'the
cosmological interpretation of the theory of proportions, current in
Hellenistic times and in the Middle Ages, with the classical notion of
"symmetry" as the fundamental principle of aesthetic perfection'.'
Mathematical relationships could be demonstrated to underlie paintingespecially with the newly invented art of perspectiveas well as
architecture.
Luca Pacioli, in his De divina proportione (Venice, 1509), felt so
strongly about the equal claim of music and perspective to belong to
the quadrivium that he wished either to remove the former or include
the latter: among his reasons he points to music's 'sonorous number
and measurement by the tempus of its prolations', perspective's
natural number according to definition and the measurement of the
visual line, as well as music's harmonic, perspective's arithmetic and
geometric, proportions. `Alas!', he remarks on the unfairness of
excluding perspective, 'who on seeing a graceful figure with its welldisposed lineaments (design), in which it appears that only breath is
lacking, would not judge it more divine than human'?13 Earlier, in the
dedicatory letter to Guidobaldo, duke of Urbino, of his Summa de
arithmetica, geometria, proportioni et proportionality (Venice, 1494), he
had listed all the arts that were dependent on the knowledge of
numbers and proportions for the practical application of the artist's
or artisan's skill, beginning with architecture and painting, the latter
for its use of perspective. Music comes next, which 'clearly gives us
the laws of number, measure, proportion, and proportionality'and
here he offers a compliment to Guidobaldo's 'celebrated chapel of
most excellent singers and players', headed by his fellow Franciscan,
frate Martino.131 Boethius' De musica is one of his primary sources;
the harmonic mean, he states, is found only in `suoni e canti', and 'is
129 Erwin Panofsky, 'The History of the Theory of Human Proportions as a Reflection of the
History of Styles', in Meaning in the Visual Arts (Garden City, NY, 1955), 55-107 at 89.
130 Part I, ch. 3. See Arnaldo Bruschi, Corrado Maltese, Manfredo Tafuri, and Renato Bonelli
(eds.), Scritti rinascimentali di architettura (Milan, 1978), 67-8.
131 'La musica chiaro ci rende lei del numero. misura. proportione. e proportionality. esser
bisognosa. Dela cui melodia V. ornatissima corte de ogni genere virtutum 6 piena. Maxime per
lo culto divino. La celeberrima capella de dignissimi canton e sonatori. Fra liquali el venerabil
padre nostro conterraneo per habito fratello frate Martino non immeritamente 8 connumerato'
(fo. 2'). Not much is known about musicians at the court of Urbino in the 1490s. Frate Martino
is possibly the Fra Martino who served as organist at the Duomo in 1475; see Bramante Ligi,
`La cappella musicale del Duomo d'Urbino', Note d'Archivio, 2 (1925), 38.
344
345