Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
METHODS. Patients with cytologically documented ALN metastases from inammatory breast carcinoma were treated in three prospective primary chemotherapy
trials. After surgery, patients were subdivided into those patients with and those
patients without residual ALN carcinoma. Survival was calculated using the
KaplanMeier method.
RESULTS. Of 175 patients treated, 61 had cytologically conrmed ALN metastases.
Fourteen patients (23%) achieved a pCR of the ALNs after primary chemotherapy.
The 5-year OS and RFS rates were found to be improved in those patients achieving
a pCR of the ALNs (82.5% [95% condence interval (95% CI), 62.8 100%] and 78.6%
[95%CI, 59.8 100%], respectively, vs. 37.1% [95%CI, 25.4 54.2%] and 25.4%
[95%CI, 15.5 41.5%], respectively) (P 0.01 [for OS] and P 0.001 [for RFS]).
Combination anthracycline and taxane-based primary chemotherapy resulted in
signicantly more patients achieving an ALN pCR (45% vs. 16%; P 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS. pCR of ALN metastases is associated with an excellent prognosis in
patients with inammatory breast carcinoma. The rates of ALN pCR are nearly 50%
in patients with inammatory breast carcinoma who are treated with anthracyclines and weekly paclitaxel before surgery. However, those patients with residual
ALN disease at the time of surgery greatly require the introduction of novel
therapeutic strategies. Cancer 2006;106:1000 6. 2006 American Cancer Society.
KEYWORDS: inammatory, breast carcinoma, primary tumor, chemotherapy, pathologic complete response.
Address for reprints: Bryan Hennessy, M.D., Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Unit 424;
The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer
Center; 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030;
Fax: (713) 792-3708; E-mail: bhennessy@
mdanderson.org
Received August 3, 2005; accepted August 24,
2005.
1001
1002
Data Analysis
Patient characteristics were tabulated or described using the median and range for all patients and by ALN
pCR group. Patient characteristics were compared between ALN pCR groups by using the Fisher exact test
or Wilcoxon rank-sum test as appropriate. OS was
calculated from the date of diagnosis to the date of
death or last follow-up. RFS was calculated from the
date of diagnosis to the date of local disease recurrence or metastasis. Patients who died before developing a local disease recurrence or metastasis were
considered censored at their date of death. The median follow-up time was calculated as the median
observation time among all patients. Survival curves
were estimated with the KaplanMeier method and
the log-rank statistic was used to compare groups.20,21
Cox proportional hazards models were t for OS and
RFS that included variables identied a priori as being
associated with survival. The t of the model and the
proportional hazards assumption was assessed visually with residual plots.
RESULTS
Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the patients
overall and by ALN pCR group. The median age at
diagnosis among all 61 patients was 50 years. Approximately half of the patients had ER- and/or PR-positive disease, and 79% had Blacks Nuclear Grading
(modied) Grade 3 disease. Fourteen patients (23%)
achieved an ALN pCR at the time of surgery; with the
exception of 1 patient who achieved an ALN pCR and
who had received preoperative radiation therapy in
addition to chemotherapy (with a subsequent residual
0.1-cm focus in the breast), 13 patients (21%) achieved
a pCR of the ALNs (and breast) after primary chemotherapy. Of the 11 patients treated on the third protocol with preoperative paclitaxel in addition to FAC, 5
patients (45% [excluding the sixth patient who
achieved a pCR of the ALNs after preoperative FAC/
paclitaxel/radiation therapy]) achieved a pCR of the
ALNs, and this was statistically superior to the rate of
ALN pCRs observed among those patients treated with
preoperative FAC only (8 of 50 patients [16%]; P
1003
TABLE 1
Patient Characteristics
All
No.
Age in yrs
Minimum
Median
Maximum
ERa
Negative
Positive
PRa
Negative
Positive
ER/PRa
Both negative
Either positive
Histologya
Ductal
Lobular
LVIa
No
Yes
MNG a
2
3
N classication
N0
N1
N2
N3
Total no. of lymph nodes at surgery
Minimum
Median
Maximum
Residual tumor in the breast
Minimum
Median
Maximum
No ALN pCR
ALN pCR
Frequency
Frequency
Percent
Frequency
Percent
P value
61
47
14
32
50
78
32
50
78
35
43.5
68
0.16
36
13
26
12
68%
32%
10
1
91%
9%
0.25
35
10
27
9
75%
25%
8
1
89%
11%
0.66
27
18
20
16
56%
44%
7
2
78%
22%
0.28
52
3
39
3
93%
7%
13
0
100%
0%
1.00
2
33
1
30
3%
97%
1
3
25%
75%
0.22
15
44
10
37
21%
79%
5
7
42%
58%
0.26
1
26
23
11
1
20
19
7
2%
43%
40%
15%
0
6
4
4
0%
43%
29%
29%
0.60
3
13
32
3
14
32
4
12
29
0.54
0
0.35
8.5
0
0.8
8.5
0
0
0.1
0.0001
ALN: axillary lymph node; pCR: pathologic complete response; ER: estrogen receptor; PR: progesterone receptor; LVI:lymphovascular invasion; MNG: modied Blacks nuclear grade; N: lymph node.
a
Numbers may not add up to total in categories because of unknown data.
1004
TABLE 2
Survival among All Patients and by Axillary Lymph Node Pathologic Complete Response Group
Overall survival
All patients
ALN pCR
No
Yes
Recurrence-free survival
All patients
ALN pCR
No
Yes
No.
No. of
events
Median
(mos)
5-year
estimate, %
95% CI
10-year
estimate, %
95% CI
61
36
47.4
46.7
(35.3%61.8%)
30.8
(18.9%50.3%)
47
14
33
3
40.9
37.1
82.5
(25.4%54.2%)
(62.8%100%)
21.8
68.8
(10.9%43.4%)
(43.9%100%)
61
38
22.9
37.4
(26.9%51.9%)
37.4
(26.9%51.9%)
47
14
35
3
19.8
25.4
78.6
(15.5%41.5%)
(59.8%100%)
25.4
78.6
(15.5%41.5%)
(59.8%100%)
P value
0.01
0.001
95% CI: 95% condence interval; ALN pCR: axillary lymph node pathologic complete response.
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 2.
DISCUSSION
Primary systemic chemotherapy is reported to completely eradicate cytologically conrmed ALN metastases in up to 23% of patients with inammatory
breast carcinoma. The data from the current study
excluded patients with clinically suspicious axillary
ndings in whom the cytology was negative or nondiagnostic. This is similar to the rate of ALN pCR re-
1005
TABLE 3
Survival by ER and ER/PR Group among Patients Who Did Not Achieve an Axillary Lymph Node Pathologic Complete Response
Overall survival
ER/PR
Negative
Positive
ER
Negative
Positive
Recurrence-free survival
ER/PR
Negative
Positive
ER
Negative
Positive
No.
No. of
events
Median
(mos)
5-year
estimate, %
95% CI
10-year
estimate, %
95% CI
P value
20
16
15
12
25.7
42.9
32.1
31.3
(16.4%63.1%)
(15.1%64.6%)
16.1
0.0
(4.9%52.8%)
0.43
26
12
19
9
34.4
40.9
36.7
25.0
(21.8%61.8%)
(9.4%66.6%)
13.1
25.0
(2.8%61.9%)
(9.4%66.6%)
0.93
20
16
17
12
14.8
20.7
13.3
25.0
(4.1%43.7%)
(10.7%58.4%)
13.3
25.0
(4.1%43.7%)
(10.7%58.4%)
0.35
26
12
21
9
19.3
19.8
18.5
25.0
(8.1%42.2%)
(9.4%66.6%)
18.5
25.0
(8.1%42.2%)
(9.4%66.6%)
0.77
ER: estrogen receptor; PR: progesterone receptor; 95% CI: 95% condence interval.
FIGURE 3. Overall survival among patients who did not achieve a pathologic
complete response of the axillary lymph nodes by estrogen receptor (ER)/
progesterone receptor (PR) group. E: events; N: number.
1006
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14. Levine PH, Steinhorn SC, Ries LG, Aron JL. Inammatory
breast cancer: the experience of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program. J Natl Cancer Inst.
1985;74: 291297.
15. Tabbane F, Bahi J, Rahal K, et al. Inammatory symptoms in
breast cancer. Correlations with growth rate, clinicopathologic variables, and evolution. Cancer. 1989;64:20812089.
16. Jaiyesimi IA, Buzdar AU, Hortobagyi GN. Inammatory
breast cancer: a review. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:1014 1024.
17. Buzdar AU, Singletary SE, Booser DJ, et al. Combined modality treatment of stage III and inammatory breast cancer.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Surg Oncol Clin
N Am. 1995;4:715734.
18. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al., editors. AJCC cancer
staging manual, 6th edition. New York: Springer-Verlag,
2002.
19. Hsu SM, Raine L, Fanger H. Use of avidin-biotin-peroxidase
complex (ABC) in immunoperoxidase techniques: a comparison between ABC and unlabeled antibody (PAP) procedures. J Histochem Cytochem. 1981;29:577580.
20. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;185:14571481.
21. Mantel N. Evaluation of survival data and two row rank
order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966;50:163170.
22. Schwartz GF, Birchansky CA, Komarnicky LT, et al. Induction chemotherapy followed by breast conservation for locally advanced carcinoma of the breast. Cancer. 1994;73:
362369.
23. Bear HD, Anderson S, Brown A, et al. The effect on tumor
response of adding sequential preoperative docetaxel to
preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide: preliminary results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and
Bowel Project Protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:4165
4174.
24. Fisher ER, Wang J, Bryant J, et al. Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy: ndings from the National Surgical
Adjuvant Breast and Bowel (NSABP) protocol B-18. Cancer.
2002;95:681 695.
25. Rouzier R, Extra JM, Klijanienko J, et al. Incidence and
prognostic signicance of complete axillary downstaging
after primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with
T1 to T3 tumors and cytologically proven axillary metastatic
lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1304 1310.
26. Shimazu K, Tamaki Y, Taguchi T, et al. Sentinel lymph node
biopsy using periareolar injection of radiocolloid for patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2004;100:25552561.
27. Trocha SD, Giuliano AE. Sentinel node in the era of neoadjuvant therapy and locally advanced breast cancer. Surg
Oncol. 2003;12:271276.
28. Breslin TM, Cohen L, Sahin A, et al. Sentinel lymph node
biopsy is accurate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for
breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3480 3486.
29. Mamounas EP, Brown A, Smith R, et al. Accuracy of sentinel
node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: updated results from NSABP B-27 [abstract 140]. Proc
Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2002.