Staking Plans PDF

ST
AK
ING
PL
AN
HORSE RACING
Staking Plans
Great Strategies for
Profitable Betting
PUBLISHED BY
Thanks for downloading!
Make sure you check out the ideas in this introductory guide.
Keep in mind, this is not a definitive guide on all things to do
with staking rather this is an introduction to the concept of
staking.
If you want to know everything about punting then join us for
free.
Over 80,000 members cant be wrong!

Join tens of thousands of happy members and get
instant access to thousands of articles.
Articles covering all aspects of betting and horse racing.You will have exclusive entry to
the worlds richest resource of betting knowledge obtained from leading racing experts
and betting professionals.
Everything you need to know about punting
practicalpunting.com.au
Contents
04 Staking - Introduction
07 How much to bet
10 What Follows
12 Staking Plans
Copyright Equestrian Publishing Pty Ltd ABN 18 106 237 199 All rights reserved. All materials contained
in this email are protected by Australian and International copyright laws and may not be reproduced,
distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the specific written permission from
Equestrian Publishing Pty Ltd.
Whilst past results can indicate a strong and reliable method, turf speculation cannot be guaranteed for
future performance. Equestrian Publishing Pty Ltd, its employees, agents or contractors, therefore cannot and
do not provide any guarantees or warranties against or in respect of fulfilment of future profits.
01 CHAPTER
STAKING INTRODUCTION
Level Stakes are the most common means of investment
STAKING
With The Optimist, Practical Punting
INTRODUCTION: Most investors would agree that how you place your money is every bit as
important as what you place it on. To put this another way, once you have made a selection
(by whatever means) you now have a responsibility to yourself to make your investment work
for you.
Level stakes are the most common means of investment: you just bet the same on
every horse. This is a time-honoured method of betting and most of the time will not
get you into much trouble (provided, of course, that your selections do the right thing!).
However, level stakes can usually be improved upon by judicious staking.
One of the most popular staking methods that I have ever devised is listed below as Plan
3. It is very easy and very safe. You decide at the very beginning what percentage of
your bank you will place on each selection and you never vary this percentage amount.
You must make your percentage very small. I recommend 1% and sometimes even
0.5% of the bank. The choice remains yours and depends on the type of selections you
make. You always bet to the highest point your bank has reached.
So if you start with a theoretical bank of $500, your initial bet is $5 (1%) and you never
go below that figure, even if your bank is showing a loss. This is because you have
allowed yourself 100 bets (1% of $500 is $5, and you get 100 of those even if you do
not back one winner).
When your bank rises to, say, $750, you will be betting $7.50 (1%) on each selection.
Again, your bets will never go backwards: you will always bet 1% of the highest point
the bank reaches, and consequently you will always be able to have 100 bets.
Using 0.5% you would always have 200 bets. It does seem to me that in the case of
single bets, % is just too safe and too slow. One hundred bets will usually be enough
to tell you whether your current method or system is going anywhere. However, there
will be systems (for example where favourites and short priced selections occur) where
you can raise your stake level.
When you are introduced below to the Level Logical Progression Plan, you will see how a
recommended brake can be applied, so that you can always remain comfortable with
your betting levels. Needless to say, you dont just go on forever- you can arrange this
plan so that you enjoy using it, and so that the stress in your betting virtually disappears.
02 CHAPTER
HOW MUCH TO BET
Great Strategies for Profitable Betting
HOW MUCH TO BET

INTRODUCTION: How much should you put away as a bank? Only you can answer that,
but I suggest to you that the bank must be viewed in two quite different ways.
The first way to view your bank is to have a very frank discussion with yourself as to
what you can afford. Any level of investment which makes you feel uncomfortable,
or which is going to impinge in any way on your standard of living, is a threat and you
should avoid it.
Besides this, you can rest assured that your betting will be influenced by your nervous
state. So bet within your limits, knowing that if you make the right investments then
the profits will come, and you will be able to increase your staking as you become more
affluent.
The second way to view your bank, and this is just as important as the first, is to
remember that you do not need to have your whole bank available to you on day one.
Hopefully, you will never invest more than 4 or 5 percent of any system bank on any one
day.
If this holds true, and you set your limit at 5% maximum for any day, your bank will
survive regardless of any occurrences, for at least 20 betting days. As long as you know
that in the long term you can financially support the bank you have established, you do
not need to have your entire bank available.
This second way of viewing your bank is very important because it allows you to make
bets at reasonable but not impossible levels. For example, if you are able to afford $50
per week for your racing investments, then theoretically you can set your bank at an
annual figure of $2600. On this basis, 1% of $2600 would be $26 and this could be
your first bet level.
On the other hand, you can start at 0.5% and make your first bet $13. On this basis,
with an average of perhaps four bets per week, your annual bank will allow you to have
200 bets (always). If the bank rises above $2600, then so will your single investments
rise above $13, and they will never decrease- you will always have 200 bets in your
bank.
The staking recommendation comes down to two rules:
1. Only ever bet what you can afford, and
2. Always base your betting on your long-term expectations.
03 CHAPTER
WHAT FOLLOWS
WHAT FOLLOWS
INTRODUCTION: A comprehensive set of staking plans is provided for you in the next
chapter, covering many different requirements.
The best policy is to make sure you can work them out on paper before you put your
money down. If you have past selections for a favourite plan of yours, apply the staking
plan that interests you and ask two basic questions:
1. Is it more successful than level stakes?
2. Can I operate it within my comfort zone?
If the answers are both yes, you have probably got yourself an appropriate betting
tool.
04 CHAPTER
THE STAKING PLANS
THE STAKING PLANS

1. LEVEL STAKES
The obvious staking plan- but nonetheless a plan. Bet the same amount on every
selection. Ensure before you begin that you have determined the percentage of the bank
you wish to bet, and stick to it.
This is the oldest method and, some would say, still the only one to follow. The choice of
how much to invest, as always, is yours, but if you dont win with this one, you probably
wont do very well with any help from a progressive betting plan.
It is ESSENTIAL that you bet level stakes where the strike rate is very low, as you
cannot guess where the next winner is coming from. If you do decide to bet level stakes
through, do yourself a favour and consider Staking Plans 3 and 10 as well. When they
can be applied, they represent outstanding modifications of level stakes betting.
2. THE GRADUAL INCLINE

This is a most conservative plan, designed to gradually incline in the right direction
without ever creating problems with your staking level. Bet level stakes, increasing
your original stake by 10% at the conclusion of a WINNING DAY. Never regress in your
betting.
Only increase your stake when the day before was a winning one overall. And only
increase by 1/10 of the original stake. This may seem tame to some bettors, but it is a
classical example of living to fight another day. Below, you will see a plan (Plan 3) based
on increasing stakes by a fixed percentage, the stake being always determined by the
bank level.
This Gradual Incline, however, takes no notice of the increase in the bank: it requires
that there simply has to be one. The increase in the stake that results from this bank
increase may appear quite small, but it remains extremely safe.
If, for example, you commence with a bank of $1000 and an initial bet of $10, you
remain on the bet of $10 until you strike a winning day. At the end of that day you
recalculate your betting for the next day as $11. You never regress, but you must wait
for the next winning day before you progress by another 10% of your original stake, that
is to say, another $1. Remember you go up by 10% of the original bet, that is, by $1.
You will appreciate that after 10 winning days you will have increased your bet to $20.
While this is a 100% increase, it is only the equivalent of one full unit (from $10 to $20).
You are only increasing your bets by 1/10 after each winning day- that is to say, 1/10 of
your single unit stake. Ten winning days will see you moving from one full staking unit
to two full staking units. So the progression is indeed quite moderate, it is a gradual
incline.
3. LEVEL LOGICAL PROGRESSION

Bet a specific percentage of the highest point your bank reaches. Never go back, even
if the bank falls. If you bet 1%, then you will always have one hundred bets in hand,
betting this way. This is The Optimists personal favourite and is outlined in detail in the
introduction above.
Following what has been written in the introduction, we might consider the situation
where a bettor establishes his devisor (the percentage he will bet of his bank) at 2 %.
This is well above the 1% used previously, but still allows for 40 bets to be made in any
sequence.
The argument for raising the percentage is that betting at 1% would take too long for
the bank to climb significantly. This is a decision only you can make. It depends on your
system and its likely percentage of winners, and of course their prices.
At 2 %, it would be wise to establish a reserve bank. Imagine that this reserve bank
and the original bank both commence at $1000. It is another way, in reality, of giving
yourself double the number of chances; it is a kind of insurance policy. You can afford to
bet 2 % because, at least in the initial situation, it is really 1 % of your total bank.
To start with, you will really have 80 and not 40 bets in hand.
Assuming things go well, your betting bank will eventually double (forget the reserve
bank for the time being- it is merely there as insurance). When the original $1000 bank
reaches $2000, apply a level and logical progression security brake.
This brake secures for you 50% of your profits each time
your bank doubles.
At this stage, you take $500 of your $1000 profit. This $500 is profit which leaves the
scene. You can put it into your holiday account, do whatever you want with it.
You then regard your revised bank as being at $1500, and you bet your 2 % of $1500,
staying with 2 % of the highest point the new bank reaches.
When the bank gets to $3000 (that is, it has again doubled) it will have made another
$1500 profit. Again you take 50% of the profit ($750) and you start again at a bank of
$2250.
By now you have collected $1250 in profit and you have probably realised that you have
covered your entire bank. Your bank was $1000 and you are well ahead of that: you are
betting with profits. Your entire remaining bank of $2250 is sheer profit.
You could at this stage, if you so wished, take another $1250 profit and go all the way
back to square one. But having got this far, and given that your entire bank is now
profit, it is probably logical to progress, with one thought in mind: what is your optimum
betting level?
This logical and controlled progression continues until you reach the betting unit with
which you are comfortable and satisfied. This is the optimum betting level for you and it
is the level above which things start to get clouded. It will differ for different people and
only you will know your level.
Should you exceed that level, you have a choice: stay on it (not above it), and bet level
stakes (clearly you are following a winning system and you have already subtracted
significant profits), or draw a line under everything and start again. Go right back to a
$1000 bank and a $1000 reserve fund.
This would mean the declaration of an extremely satisfying profit, insuring yourself
against losing any of it, and putting the original banks back into play. But those new
banks will be merely a part of profits. Where profits are concerned, there can be great
satisfaction in taking the money and running.
4. THE SNOWBALL
This is quite complex staking plan and if you prefer very simple plans, you can give this
one a miss. However, it can be very rewarding and lead to rapid profits, if you can find
the winners.
Bet as follows: 2.2.2.3.3.4.4.5.5.6.7.7.
What this means is that your first second and third bets are all two units, then you make
two bets of three units each, two bets of four units, two bets of five, one of six units and
two more bets at seven units each.
This totals fifty units for twelve bets. A high win strike rate system is recommended
here. The win strike rate is the percentage of wins you get from your bets. For
example, if you have 100 bets and you get 21 winners, your win strike rate is 21%. If
you have 100 bets and you get only 10 winners, your win strike rate is 10%. This is not
very high and would not be suitable for the Snowball staking plan.
Now we move to the details of the Snowball concept.
If at any stage a winner is backed at 4/1 or better, deduct the STAKE for that bet and
divide the Remaining Profit by 3.
This profit is invested on the Next Three Selections Equally (one third on each) As Well
As Having the usual bet in the sequence. This is the SNOWBALL effect.
For example, you strike a 5/1 winner at the sixth bet (4 units). You receive 24 units, less
your 4 unit stake, a profit of 20. That 20 is divided by 3, and 6.50 (nearest dollar if you
like) is placed on the next three bets, along with their normal stakes of 4,5 and 5 units.
So theyd have $10.50, $11.50 and $11.50 on them.
Comment: This can add up, and really SNOWBALL if you strike a handful of winners. At the
end of the series of bets, simply go back to Bet One, and take whatever is still
travelling on the Snowball with you into the next sequence.
5. STOP AT A WINNER FOR THE DAY

As soon as you are in front for the day, stop betting. Thats it! There many plans
that depend on this staking plan- while it may seem too simple to warrant inclusion,
British pros often still recommend it. They say there is nothing so good for a punters
confidence than to make the desired profit for the day and then shut up shop.
It will always remain a matter of opinion.
6. DOUBLE UP
Bet level stakes, UNLESS your selection won its last start on todays track over todays
distance. In other words, unless it is a course and distance winner and a last start
winner.
In your form guide, that selection will have a C alongside its name if it has won on that
track at that distance. If it is also a last-start winner, you add 100 per cent to the stake.
If that makes you nervous, add 50 per cent.
Many systems that are involved with last start winners fail in the long run, because
they blindly follow winning horses: this staking plan identifies a very crucial factor and
advises a double bet when it is detected in a selection.
7. THE ACTIVE/PASSIVE PLAN

This one is easy. It is a spin-off, in a way, from Plan 3s 50% concept.
You separate your bank into two equal parts (e.g. 40 and 40 for a bank of 80). Now you
save the PASSIVE 40 for emergencies, and bet with the other ACTIVE 40. You bet 2 units
per selection for 20 races.
If the ACTIVE 40 bank gets to 80 (i.e. it doubles), you declare a 50 per cent profit, take
out 20, and start again with a 60 active bank and bets of 3 units (again following a 20bet sequence).
If the 60 bank doubles to 120, you take 50 per cent of the profit (30) and start with a
bank of 90, and continue with bets of 4.50.
Each time the profits are creamed off, they go into the passive, waiting bank. So, when
the active bank gets to 90, the passive bank will have soared to 90 as well (40+20+30),
and whatever happens from now on, you cannot lose!
8. FIVE FIFTHS INSURANCE

This is a good one from an old but faithful staking book. Your bank is 100 units. You take
a fifth of that. Thats 20. You take a fifth of that. Thats 4. The other four-fifths (16) are
bet for the place, while the one-fifth (4) is bet to win.
The bet is, therefore, 4 by 16. Whatever the bank, you divide it by five, then by five
again. That second lot of fives is split four for the place and one for the win.
Do NOT use this plan with ANY system that does not show a 20 per cent or more winstrike rate.
9. ONE BET SAFETY

The bank is 90 units. The bets are 2.4.6.8.10.12.14.16.18; making 90 for a nine-bet
sequence.
Clearly, this plan expects a lot of winners. At any stage, to cut even, one winner at 4/1
will do trick. Except for the final stage, 7/2 is the maximum required to cut even. More
than that, at any stage, produces a profit for the entire series.
This concept is best applied to systems with a very small number of selections and a
high strike rate. Longer priced favourites might be considered for inclusion.
10. STATISTICAL ASSUMPTIONS

This is an excellent plan if you are prepared to make the extra effort.
Base your expectations on past performances. Check the WSR (win strike rate - it may
be 20 per cent, which is one in five, or one fifth). Check the Price Average (divide the
total returns by the number of selections, then deduct the selections total again, to
eliminate the cost of the stakes).
Example: Bank 100.
Win Strike Rate: 20 percent - this is one in five, or one fifth.
Price Average: 13/2 (say, 30 winners returning 225, less the stake, 30, is 195. Divide
this by 30, your win total, and you get 6.50).
You are anticipating a winner at the rate of one in five. The cut-even point would be to
get one winner in five at 4/1 (100 back for 100 out, in every 100 races), but you are
aiming to get one winner in five at better odds than that, and do a little better in profit
(with minimal risk) by betting to what you know has happened in the past.
Multiply the average price by the fractional strike rate: 6.5 x 1/5 = 1.30
Your bet is not one unit, but 1.30 units. This is designed to improve previous profit
results over 100 bets or more, based on what HAS happened.
You can calculate this for any of the systems. A small extra investment might be as
logical as a level stake outlay!
11. THE MONEYMAKER

This plan works on the premise that you are seeking a set return on investment, and
features the following:
1. It is extremely safe.
2. It can be continuously profitable.
3. It is flexible enough to be adapted to most requirements.
4. It is very easy to operate and monitor.
With a staking plan of this strength, you can be confident that you are not stepping into
the unknown when you set out on your betting plan. You can rest assured that the
staking plan will boost your profits, not batter them.
THE RULES
1. Set your profit level requirement. (In this case, for the purposes of
explanation, we are setting a 20 per cent return on investment.)
Virtually any percentage figure can be used, but the higher the figure,
the greater the risk.
2. Start with a basic unit investment and progress up the scale only
when you are not achieving your predetermined profit. Flat-stake
betting continues until the profit balance is less than the profit
required.
3. The progression scale is based on a 20 per cent rising scale, in line
with the required 20 per cent profit. Any progression scale can be
used, so long as it is a strict percentage progression, like 5%, 10%
and so on
PROGRESSION SCALE (at 20% profit demand)

($5 base unit)

Bet No.
Stake
Bet No. Stake Bet No Stake Bet No. Stake
11
12
21
30
31
74
12
14.5
22
36
32
89
13
17.5
23
43
33
107
8.5
14
21
24
52
34
128
10
15
25
25
62
35
154
12
16
30
26
74
36
185
14.5
17
36
27
89
37
222
17.5
18
43
28
107
38
266
21
19
52
29
128
39
320
10
25
20
62
30
154
40
385
Remember that you are seeking a 20 per cent profit on total investment. You only rise up
the scale if you have not achieved this. As soon as you have made 20 per cent (or more)
profit on your total investment, you return to bet No. 1, and stay there until your total
profit drops below 20 per cent on outlay.
REQUIRED BANK
This is a mild, conservative progression and the bank can be limited to 75 times your
base bet. We have assumed a $5 base bet, thus your required bank is $375.
Lets look at a theoretical workout:

Bet
Stake
Placed
Lose
Win
Lost
Lost
Lost
8.5
Lost
8.5
10
Lost
10
12
Lost
12
14.5
Lost
14.5
17.5
Lost
17.5
21
Won3/1
63
The bank now stands at: Staked $101.50, total return $84. You are still losing $17.50,
so you continue the progression:

10
25
Lost
25
11
12
Won 5/1
60
The bank now stands at: Staked $138.50, total return $156. This is a profit of $17.50,
or 12.5 per cent on outlay, so the required 20 per cent has not yet been achieved, so the
progression continues.

12
14.5
Won 3/1
43.5
Bank now stands at: Staked $153, total return $214. This is a profit of $61, which
represents a total of 39.86 per cent profit on turnover. Therefore, you have more than
achieved your 20 per cent profit on turnover, and you go back to level-stakes betting at
$5 per bet. You maintain this level-stakes approach until your profits go below 20 per
cent of your total outlay. If that happens, you start the progression again.
In the example above, we allowed for a run of eight losers at the commencement of the
progression. Do your own tests on paper and maybe allow for losing runs of 10 and
15. They will demonstrate how effective this plan is, even under the pressure of a long
run of outs. The plan is at its most attractive when you are dealing with a high win
strike rate but lower dividend expectations. This is a highly attractive plan for favourite
backers.
12. THE $16 BANK PLAN

There is a belief among punters that one should minimise losses and maximise profits.
This is a wise approach to all betting.
The aim of this staking plan is to keep the punters personal risk to a minimum, but gain
the maximum benefit from winners backed. This can be accomplished by making very
small bets with the players own money and large bets only with money won.
The system may be used on or off the track. A unit can be any amount from, say 50
cents upwards, but for the purpose of explanation we will make the minimum bet $2.
We will first explain the method using a total capital of $16. This is a straight-out play.
All bets are made WIN only.
Here is the scale of bets if you had six bets and they all lost - First bet, $2; second, $2;
third, $2; fourth, $3; fifth, $3; sixth, $4.
If you should lose six consecutive bets you start again with $2 and continue as before.
Now there are three rules to explain how you are to wager when you have hit a winner,
and this depends on price. Let us take this one step at a time, and the first step is the
bright one- when we back a winner returning a profit of more than 12 units.
Whenever we back a winner at such a pay-off, we deduct the amount of the stake and
divide the actual profit into three parts, regardless of the size of the bet.
The first part is one-sixth of the amount won. The second part is one-third of the
amount won. The third part is one-half of the amount won.
Thus, if we won $30 on one bet we divide 30 by six then by three then by two, which
would give us units of $5, $10 and $15 respectively. We will now explain how these
units are to be invested. The easiest way is with figures showing an actual play.
First bet, $2, LOST. Second bet, $2, LOST. Third bet, $2, won at 9/1. Profit on the bet
is $18. Now we make the division to the nearest dollar (1/6th, 1/3rd. one-half) and we
have three units of $3, $6 and $9. These now become our units of investment.
Fourth bet, $3, LOST. Fifth bet, $6, Lost. Sixth bet, $9, WON at 6/1. The PROFIT on this
6th bet is $54. We again divide to ascertain the new betting units, which are $9, $18
and $27, to cover the possibility of three more bets.
Seventh bet is the $9, which is LOST. Eighth bet, $18, WON at 10/1. Again we divide the
$180 profit, and the three units are $30, $60 and $90.
Ninth bet, $30, LOST. Tenth bet, $60, LOST. Eleventh bet, $90. Now if this bet lost we
would have used up our three units and would return to our starting wager of $2. If the
11th had won we could call it a day and start afresh, or we could again divide and carry
on with three new units. THE PROGRESSION ALWAYS STOPS WHEN YOU WIN TWO
SUCCESSIVE BETS. Had the ninth bet won we would have begun all over again from $2.
RULE 2. When you win at 3/1 you can continue on as if you had not won at all.
RULE 3. When you win at 3/1, but your winnings are LESS than 12, you make your
units two, four and six.
13. THE WORKING ACCOUNT PLAN

Most staking plans require substantial capital backing. One that does not call for more
money than needed for one days betting is the Working Account method, first developed
more than 60 years ago.
It calls for bets to be made on a flat stake with an increase for FOUR races after backing
a winner. On a good day, or during a winning cycle, the plan can run into worthwhile
profits because it calls for the reinvestment of returns from winning bets.
The method is safe and sensible because, over a period, there is a built-in limit to
the amount a player can lose; there is no ceiling to the percentage of profit which
can be gained. This is wise-money betting in the best sense as it provides for money
management.
Against the possibility of profits you have the security of not being able to lose more
than a flat stake on the number of races on which you intend to bet.
Say, for instance, you bet in $2 units. Your flat stake is always $2, so on a programme
of eight races you stand to lose $16.
With this method your stakes increase for four races every time you back a winner,
irrespective of price.
At the second race you might back a winner at 4/1. You deduct your original stake of $2
and divide the $8 return on the next four races. So for the next four races you will have
your base bet of $2 per race plus $2 from your second winner.
In race three you strike a winner at 2/1. You pocket your stake of $2, plus $3 from the
extra bet, and then divide the $4 on the next four races, so on races four, five and six
you will have your base bet of $2, plus $2 from the 3rd race winner, plus $1 from the
fourth race winner.
On race seven you will have your base investment of $2 plus the $1 played up from race
three, plus of course any extra money from races four, five and six. This system can be
carried on from meeting to meeting, and during a winning run your working account will
grow appreciably. With this method you are simply playing up the returns from winning
bets, and backing yourself to find at least one winner in every four races on which you
operate.
If you are carrying on from meeting to meeting the system works best if you carefully
select the races on which you bet. In this way you will pass over a lot of losers and
probably come up with a higher percentage of winners. And it does not matter at what
price the winners start.
The aim is to keep your working account working and growing for your ultimate benefit.
Should your working accounts grow too large you can always cancel them out by
pocketing the winnings, and start again with the same or a slightly increased base
stake.
14. A DAILY BANK METHOD

One cardinal rule of betting is to place a limit on losses, with no ceiling on possible
profits. Those who employ such a policy will always be in control of their betting and will
avoid much of the grief which can come the way of the haphazard or compulsive punter.
There are many loss-limit staking methods. The one we deal with here is for the raceto-race bettor, or the person who may decide to restrict himself to a predetermined
number of bets in a week, or month.
The operation is simple. First decide just how much you can afford to lose, and your
betting unit. The size of each wager is determined by dividing the number of betting
opportunities into the banks balance, but there is an added rule to cover the final two
bets IF you are winning.
EXAMPLE:
There are eight races on the card and you are going to have a base bet of one unit on
each race-and a unit can be any amount from 50 cents up.
Lets say you decide to bet in $5 units with a bank of $40. For the opening wager you
divide eight (the number of races) into $40 (the available capital). This calls for a stake
of $5. If the horse loses, capital is down to $35 and the number of races left is seven.
Seven into $35 again means a wager of $5. We will say this horse wins at 5/1. You gain
$25, which takes the banks balance to $60. Now there are six races remaining so the
next wager is $10-six divided into $60. You continue in this way- adding profits to the
capital, or deducting losses, while as each race goes by the divisor is reduced by one.
The time to take stock of the play is when you arrive at the second last and the last
races. Should you be losing then you carry on as above because, even if the results still
go against you, it is not possible to lose more than your starting bank.
However, it would be most unwise to follow this procedure if you were winning when the
seventh and eighth events were coming up for decision. If you struck two losers using a
divisor of two or one you would not only erode all profit, but also the starting bank.
The wise course with only two races to go is to bet one-fifth of the banks balance. That
is, you then use a divisor of five. Even with two losers you could still finish with a nice
profit while one or two further collects would add to the gain.
This system can be employed for backing one horse a race to win, each way, or multiple
betting. It is also a good system for those who favour the place tote and bet only on
runners which stand out as strong place propositions. The strength of the play is that
you know in advance that you cannot lose more than your daily bank, yet there is no
limit to what you may win. It is one of the best of all the loss limit progression plays.
15. THE PLACE-GETTER

If operated with common sense, this approach can produce a steady annual profit. There
is one paramount rule that should be followed by place bettors. You dont back a horse
which you feel MIGHT be placed. In practically every race there are a number of runners
which MAY fill a place. The wise course is to wait for a horse which SHOULD WIN, then
support it for a place.
The percentage of collects will be much higher; the possible chance of a long run of outs
is reduced while a succession of smallish dividends will more than offset an occasional
large one.
The Rules Are Simple

You use three betting brackets. You can bet in units to suit your capital. On sound
selections a bank of 200 units should be more than sufficient. For the purpose of
explaining the method we will make a minimum bet of $2. The brackets are:

A
2.00
6.00
18.00
B
4.00
12.00
36.00
C
8.00
24.00
72.00
You start by playing the A bracket. If at any time you back a placegetter paying $3,
or better (for $2), in other words 2/1 ON or better, the A is completed and you start
again. If you back a placegetter at shorter than 2/1 on, you repeat the bet.
Should you strike three successive losers (non-placegetters) or the $18 bet misses, you
move to the B bracket unit you have a collect with your $36 bet.
When in the B bracket your $4 bet is repeated if the odds received are less than 2/1
on. If a $4 bet loses, you go to $12. Should you hit a dividend of 2/1 on or better, you go
back to $4. If a $12 bet loses, you move to $36. A win here at 2/1 on or better sends
you BACK TO THE START OF THE A BRACKET.
Should the $36 bet in the B bracket miss, you then transfer to the C bracket and
continue the same betting method as with the B bracket, so a win with the $72 wager
means you start all over again with the $2 bet.
Safety Rule
When the third horse in either A or B fills a place at less than 2/1 on, dont repeat until
you add up the investment and return columns. If the series is showing a profit to that
point it could be safer to accept it and return to the original stake. It does save you
getting into the higher brackets. If your capital is adequate and you want to play strictly
to the rules, by all means do so.
16. DOUBLE PENDULUM STARTING PLAN

This is also known as the Round Robin. It calls for a series of mixed doubles over one
meeting or a series of meetings, and can be played on as many races as you wish. The
bets can be straight out, each way or place tote.
For example, suppose you fancied three horses in different races and they are Red,
White and Blue. A Round Robin is the maximum number of doubles possible with the
number of horses selected.
In this case the most doubles possible would be three-Red all on White, Red all on Blue
and White all on Blue.
If you decided to cross double four horses it would call for six doubles. Five horses in
mixed doubles call for 10 couplings, six horses 15 doubles, seven horses 12 doubles,
and eight horses 28 doubles.
Providing your selections are solid, this is a powerful method of play and even on the
place tote can build up to substantial profits.
Say you pick out five certain placegetters and you decided on $1 mixed doubles on
the place tote. If all were placed there would be a worthwhile return irrespective of how
small the dividends.
We know one man who operates the place tote pendulum in spans of a maximum of
eight weeks. He decides that in eight weeks he is going to pick the eyes out of the
programme and find EIGHT CERTAIN PLACEGETTERS and complete a series of mixed
doubles embracing eight horses.
This means he would eventually have 28 doubles. His sequence of base bets would be in
the ratios of seven units, 6,5,4,3,2,1. He bets in $5 units. So on his first day of operation
he would have $35 place tote on his selection. If it ran a place and paid, say $1.40
he would collect $49. This would call for an extra $14 to go on each of his next seven
selections plus his base bets.
His total outlay of his own money for these eight weeks of play would be $140. If each
of his selections filled a place he would cash in 28 doubles. If the average dividend was
only $1.40 he would win over $130, while if only half of his selections were placed he
would be square. But, by picking out the best place bets at each of eight meetings, he
would probably always come up with a much better than 50% collect average.
Selecting one certain - or near certain - placegetter a meeting is perhaps the easiest
assignment you could set a student of form, especially if you were ultra-conservative
and refused to have a bet if you came to a meeting at which there was no stand-out
place investment.
But what about coupling two horses each race throughout the programme?
This is a well-known staking operation. It requires a fairly large capital and can be a big
winner on good days although it is not as safe as place play.
We will assume you are betting on seven events on the programme in $1 units. The
minimum capital required to link two horses a race for each of the seven races would be
$42.
First Race:
You would invest $6 on each of your two selections.
Second Race: Invest $5 on each selection.
Third Race: $4 on both selections.
Fourth Race: Put $3 on both selections.
Fifth Race: $2 on each selection.
Sixth Race: $1 on each selection.
Seventh Race: No base investment.
The rules for coupling up are quite simple. If one of your selections wins at 7/2 or under,
you place an extra two points (in this case $2) on each selection in the remaining races.
If the price of a winner is 4/1 to 6/1 inclusive, you have $3 on each of the remaining
selections.
If the winning price is 7/1 or linger, the bet on each subsequent selection would be four
units, or $4.
So if you struck the winner in the first race at 3/1 you would outlay an extra $2 on every
subsequent selection. Then, if you had a 4/1 winner in the second race, you would place
an additional $4 on each selection in the remaining five races, and so on throughout the
day.
The original (or base) bets are made on every race with the units carried on from
winners added to the stake.
With this method of betting you would have to make careful selections with a sprinkling
of well-priced winners.
The system was devised for operation on individual programmes. A better plan would
be to spread the bets over a series of meetings as with the place operation explained
earlier.
For instance, instead of betting on seven RACES on one day, you wait for meetings
in which you can find a race you can select in two and spread the wagers over a
maximum SEVEN meetings.
You may find one suitable race one day, and perhaps two, or even three, the next.
This approach would step up your winning average and provide you with a better chance
of success.
A way in which to test the possibilities of this staking plan would be to try it on paper.
Go back over past results and use the first and second favourites, or the top two in
the popularity poll. This would provide you with some indication as to whether the plan
would work successfully on reasonable selections, especially those which at times bring
in a fair price winner.
17. THE RESERVE FUND WAGERING PLAN

Many punters seek a staking plan with the type of bet to be made (straight-out, eachway or place only) left to the race-by-race judgement of the investor.
Most systems call for one means of staking but The Reserve Fund Wagering Plan
can be employed in all three ways according to the best value. It can also be used for
multiple betting providing you do not invest more than the number of units laid down by
the rules.
This plan was originally designed for play on solid selections and, providing you bet only
when you feel the chance of a collect is better than the possibility of loss, it can run into
good money.
When you come to a bettable race, decide the type of bet likely to produce the safest
investment. You may have to invest 10 units. This can be staked straight-out, each-way,
place tote or, if you consider there are, say, three chances, you can save on two of the
runners and invest the balance of the 10 units on your prime fancy.
The Reserve Fund Plan is a combination of flat stake betting and slow progression, and
with a high percentage of winners it can make capital grow fast and with safety. It is
based on the premise that when the operator is making a profit he should set aside part
of it after each winning bet, for two reasons:
1. To provide a fund for use in the event a losing streak wipes out the original
starting capital, and
2. To permit the punter to increase the size of his bets from his profits after a series
of successful investments.
You begin play with a starting capital of 100 units. This amount is entered on the Play
Chart in the first column, under Capital on Hand.
The starting bet is 10 units on the first horse played. When the result is known, further
entries are made.
If the first bet is on a winner, 20 percent of the profit is put into the Reserve Fund, and
the balance of the profit is added to the Capital on Hand.
If the first bet is a loser, naturally nothing is added to the Reserve Fund or the Capital on
Hand, and 10 units must be deducted from the Capital on Hand.
The operator continues to be 10 units on each selection, adding 20 per cent of the profit
on each winning wager to the Reserve Fund, the balance to Capital on Hand, until the
Reserve Fund total reaches 20 units.
At this point the amount in the Reserve Fund is added to Capital on Hand and the
amount of the wager is increased from 10 to12 points.
Play continues as before, the operator always adding 20 percent of the profit on each
winning wager to the Reserve Fund, the balance to Capital on Hand, until the Reserve
Fund has again reached 20 (original units), at which point it is again transferred to
Capital on Hand and the wager is increased another two, from 12 to 14 points, and this
procedure is kept up, the betting point always being increased by two every time the
balance in the Reserve Fund reaches 20.
That is all there is to the betting plan. It provides a sound basis of flat stake investment
with bets increasing according to capital growth. Do not use it if you are just going to
have a bet for the sake of making one. This is a plan for the person who gives thought to
selecting and strives to make betting a business more than a gamble.
It is left to the individual as to when he wants to stop increasing, withdraw his profits
and start again on the same or an increased bank.
18. THE SIX POINT PLAN

The Six Point Plan has been around for a long time. Few people use it. And yet it is one
of the easiest methods around to enable you to win on a consistent basis. There really is
no great risk attached to its operation, because you can introduce a built-in safety brake
if things threaten to get out of control.
Professionals regard it as the soundest of all target-staking methods. Its been played in
Australia for more than 50 years, but seems to have been more popular in the 30s and
40s than nowadays, when punters seem more impatient than their predecessors.
The aim of the Six Point Plan is to win six betting units every time the punter backs a
winner, or winners, whose odds total six. The target figure decides the opening bet.
Example: If you were aiming to win $6 altogether, the opening bet would be $1 because
the DIVISOR is six. So you have six divided into six, which equals a bet of one unit. The
betting action is just a matter of simple division of the DIVISOR into the TARGET figure.
To explain the action, well work to a target figure of $12. To work out your bets you use
the divisor of six and the target of 12. The opening bet, then, is $2 (12 divided by six).
If the opening bet lost, the objective would be increased by the lost $2 to $14 and you
would then divide six into 14 to get the total of the next bet.
Rounding off, your next bet would be $2.50. Lets assume your bet lost again. You now
have a target of $16.50 and this is divided by six so your next bet would be, rounded
off, $3. Lets assume the worst and we have this horse losing. Your target now rises to
$19.50, which again is divided by six to get your next bet, which is, rounded off, $3.50.
Good news! You get a winner at 2/1. That means you have won $7 of the target of
$19.50, which reduces the target to $12.50. You now have to drop your divisor by two
points (the price of the winner) and this now becomes a divisor of four.
Your next bet, then, is $12.50 divided by four, which gives you a vet, rounded off, of $3.
If this bet won, say, at 3/1 you would have a profit of $9 coming off the $12.50, leaving
you only $3.50 to get to complete the Six Point Plan, with a divisor of 1. At this point you
can simply rule off that particular section and begin a completely new Six Point target
and divisor.
Should you strike a losing run which seems without end, you can easily halt any rapid
rise in stakes by introducing the Safety Brake. The divisor may be six when you strike a
slump which has taken the target figure to, say, 60, meaning a bet of 10 units next time.
All you do now is bring in a new divisor to add to the present one, and a fresh target.
This means a new target of 12 (added to the current 60) making 72, and a new divisor
of 12.
Your next bet, then, would be 72 divided by 12, equalling six. If you were still not happy
you could even bring in a third divisor of six and a third extra target of 12, making your
set-up now a target of 84 divided by 18, meaning a next bet of, say, $4.50.
You can also introduce new divisor/target figures when your current divisor has, say,
dropped to two, with an objective, say, of $5. This calls for a $2.50 bet. Whenever the
divisor is lower than three it is sensible, to protect your capital, to bring in a new divisor
and objective, as this prevents stakes rising too rapidly in the event of a long losing run.

Divisor

2
Bring in new divisor

6
New divisor/target

8
Target
5
12
17
As you can see, you now have a new divisor of eight and a new target of 17, giving you
a next bet of, say, $2. Why do we bring in this safety brake? Because, with a divisor of
only two you strakes could climb too steeply and the situation just might become fraught
with panic on your side.
The good thing about the Six Point Plan is that it provides, through the safety brakes, for
a common-sense approach. Also, you MUST win in the end! On any reasonable set of
selections, you will eventually back winners whose combined total odds will wipe out the
divisor and produce the desired profit.
19. ONE IN TEN AT 4/1

Progression betting has good and bad points. Opinions will always differ. Well, heres
yet another angle on progression and one that should deeply interest any punter who
likes the idea of breaking square on just one winner in 10 bets! (Who wouldnt like that
idea?).
If you can get your selections to a point where they do not run into horror losing streaks,
the following plan will be most useful. If, over a period of years, it has become apparent
that your winners fall in a certain price bracket, and that you can, say, pick one winner
in five, at an average of 4/1 or better, then you simply have to be a candidate for this
progression approach.
There is a simple step-by-step staking plan, and you should never get into too much
strife. The recommended staking steps are as follows: 1-1-1-1-2-2-3-4-5-6.
This means a total outlay of 26 units over 10 bets. If you have five bets a week, thats
two weeks action. Each loser takes you onto the next stage in the progression, but if
you strike a winner and a profit is shown then you rule off and start a new series.
If you do not win by Bet 9, you really are having a bad trot and it might be wise to just
pull up sticks there and then, and start again, although some of you will want to have a
final fling with the 10th bet of six units.
At the various stages of this progression plan, a win would return 400%, 250%, 66%,
25%, 40%, 25%, 36%, 33%, 25% and finally 15%. If you strike a winner at less than
4/1, you simply keep going with the sequence, unless, of course, you find yourself in
profit, in which case you end the series.
20. THE OPTIMISTS MODIFIED

ONE IN TEN STAKING PLAN
There is a twist to the One In Ten betting method: Its the 4/1 double. This time we are
aiming to get a double at 4/1 in 10 selections. That means in 20 bets, really, as we will
be trying to get two horses to win for us. We will use the All-Up method, or you could
use the Daily and Extra Doubles chosen by your TABs. It depends very much where you
believe you can find the best value chances.
Can you find two winners- one at evens and one at 6/4- on a programme? Can you do
it ONCE in 10 tries? If you can, you can land a 4/1 double- and any better odds will see
you travelling even more sweetly. At evens, the bet becomes two on the second leg and
at 6/4 you get back five units for your original one unit bet, and that means a profit of
four units.
You can test this idea with a staking run of 1.1.1. then 1.5, then 2,2,3,3,5,5.
Take the fourth bet as an example. Say it returns a 4/1 double. Since the bet is $1.50,
the return would be $7.50 ($6 + the stake of $1.50). This is a profit on the series of $3,
for an outlay of $4.50. That is in fact 66%- not at all bad.
The gentle progression allows you to make ten investments spanning twenty very short
priced horses (probably all favourites). Say the final bet wins at 4/1 the double. The
return would be $25 ($20 + $5 stake). A tiny profit is still struck.
The idea of trying ten times to find an evens and a 6/4 chance to couple, and failing
every time, seems to me unlikely. Furthermore, you could take four of the bet series
above, each at 25 points, and have a 100 unit bank- one for each of four venues, every
weekend.
There would be times when you hit all four, and a few times when you managed no
doubles at all. But overall, you would make a maximum forty bets, in four venues, over
ten betting days or more.
My suggestion? Every time your OVERALL bank increased by $25 (on one dollar units), I
would redistribute it across all four venues and resume on level terms.
21. MULTIPLE BETS

Multiple betting is best done using a separate bank and restricting your outlay
to a moderate percentage of your larger overall bank. It is difficult to make a
recommendation, as situations will differ, but certainly one recommendation must be set
in concrete.
This is the recommendation that you do not resort to treating multiple bets as lottery
tickets. Of course on Melbourne Cup day most of us will have a fling. Clients of TAB
Ltd may decide to take a handful of mystery first four, or trifecta, tickets on the big race.
But for the rest of the year multiple betting must be regarded as a serious part of your
winner-finding activities: you must never allow it to eat away at your other profits. They
are too hard to come by.
Two of the most popular multiple bets are the Yankee and the Canadian. The first
involves selecting four horses and the other involves five horses. Sometimes the
Canadian has been called the Super Yankee.
The idea is to couple up all selections in doubles, trebles and four or five horse
accumulators. They can be for win or place or a mixture. You can take them with some
TABs and with some of the larger bookmakers, especially on the Internet. You can also
take them in fixed odds bets, ahead of time. For example, the TABs will be offering
Yankee options on the Caulfield Cup, Melbourne Cup, Cox Plate and VRC Derby.
The requirements for a Yankee are 11 bets: six doubles, four trebles and one four horse
accumulator. The Canadian will require 26 bets: ten doubles, ten trebles, five four-horse
accumulators, and one five horse accumulator.
A Yankee bet is a combination of doubles, trebles and one accumulator. The total cost
for $1.00 units is $11.00, and the bets are distributed as follows:
Assume four horses A, B, C and D.

Doubles
A & B
A & C
A & D
B & C
Trebles
AB & C
AB & D
AC & D
BC & D
Accumlator
ABC & D
Doubles Trebles
B&D
C&D
Accumlator
Total bets 11.
Strike the jackpot and you can win big money, but remember to restrict your betting in
this potentially hazardous area. It is worth remembering that a Yankee selecting four
winners at $3 (2/1 each) returns the quite remarkable dividend of $243 for $11. Have
a dollar on each of these horses individually and you would receive $12 for an outlay of
$4.
Should a day occur in your betting year when you fancy four short priced horses, you
should not lose sight of this chance of making a killing. Your chances of doing so on
short priced horses are immeasurably higher.
$243 may not seem like a fortune, but it is what you get for backing four 2/1 selections
in the Yankee (and it is more than 20/1). Selecting four horses at 10/1 would produce a
fortune, but the probability of all four winning is enormously reduced.
Therefore, for a balanced Yankee, we believe you should at least include a couple
of short priced horses because they have a much greater chance of returning you a
dividend.
To provide one final example of how you might insure yourself in a Yankee bet, imagine
that your four selections are returned at 2/1, 3/1, 10/1 and 50/1.
Obviously, all racing statistics will tell you that those first two selections have a much
greater chance of success. Say they win and the other two dont.
You will outlay $11 and receive back $12. A double at 11/1 is the result of picking a 2/1
winner into a 3/1 winner. The logic is very clear here, and, as the saying goes, nobody
ever goes broke by taking a profit!
22. BETTING EXCHANGES

The enormous effect of betting exchanges in other countries is likely to have serious
repercussions for Australian betting strategies.
A betting exchange is like every other monetary exchange: it is a kind of stock market
based on future opinion.
At its simplest, a betting exchange allows you to bet that a horse will either win or lose
a race. It allows the punter to become a bookmaker and to lay odds against a horse
winning.
For example, if you believe that a horse can win a race and I believe it will not, I would
not normally back the horse, but you would (other things being equal).
But I might be prepared to bet you that the horse will not win and you might be prepared
to bet me that it will.
This is just like the deals you do with your bookmaker or your TAB. Of course the real
situation is more complex than I just described, because you will want odds.
So lets say that I offer you 3/1 and the best you can get on the TAB is $3.25 (9/4). I
am offering you a better price than your TAB.
If we are both members of a betting exchange, you can go to the relevant race on the
betting exchange website and see what price is being offered about your horse. I can
go there and see whether I would be prepared to offer that price or even more.
Say that the best price being offered about your horse is 5/2. I offer 3/1 and you snap it
up. We have done the deal.
Only the winner of our arrangement pays the betting exchange. If you win your bet you
pay them 5% of your profit. Similarly if you lose your bet, I have to pay 5% because I
have won the bet.
Clearly the huge advantage for the punters staking is this 5%. The TAB takes an
average of 16 to 20% from every dollar you put in. The betting exchange takes 5%, and
only when you win.
Obviously if the markets settle in much the same range, a 5% deduction is greatly
preferable. Not only that, but you are not charged anything if you lose your bet (except of
course for your stake).
To really grasp the principles involved here, you must recognise that the tax component
is built into every bet you make through normal channels: you cannot avoid it.
A betting exchange offers professional and serious punters the opportunity to retain and
invest anything up to $15 additional in every $100 they outlay.
Further, it offers anyone who wants to be a bookmaker the chance to be one with the
only additional expense being 5% of their net winnings.
Morally it is a tricky question, and one for other people to sort out. So far as staking is
concerned, it does represent a viable option, as evidenced by the enormous response in
other countries.
How might we stake if we bet with the betting exchanges? Provided that they can
accommodate our level of betting, there is nothing whatsoever to stop us from
supporting horses in exactly the same way that has been recommended above (for
example using the Level Logical Progression process - Plan 3). Or, for that matter,
several of the staking methods which have been outlined.
However, if we turn bookmaker, we must assume a very low level of profit from a high
outlay. This is the classical profit on turnover situation that all bookmakers work
under.
If I turn bookmaker (see example above) and I offer you 3/1 on your selection, I am
saying that I believe your horse has less than a 25% chance of winning.
That is, I am giving you one chance out of four, because I believe your horse has
perhaps really only got one chance in five or maybe one in six of winning the race.
The odds should be with me anyway, if this is just an isolated bet, because we both
probably agree that the percentages are in favour of the horse NOT winning.
Even if you think it should be a 2/1 chance, that means you think it has one chance in
three of winning and two chances in three of losing.
It is very difficult for someone who has spent their entire racing life betting on horses to
change the whole way they think here. However it is a very healthy experience. As the
bookmaker, you must stake according to how wrong you think the punters are.
On a betting exchange it is most unlikely you will get any takers, if you offer odds that
are below those offered on the TAB. Why would anyone bet with you?
So you would probably be best advised, if you want to be the bookmaker, to use this
following simple staking plan and stick to it like glue.
This is a whole new area, and the first rules are more akin to a safe anti-selection
method, then comes the advice as to staking under this method:
Staking as bookmaker on betting exchanges:

1. Identify a race where you believe there are three or more strong chances.
2. If you believe that one horse is justifiably and clearly favourite, write its name
down or mark it clearly.
3. Check the TAB favourite thirty minutes before the race. If it is your marked
selection, delete the race.
4. If it is not, continue as follows.
5. Identify the odds of the established favourite on your TAB.
6. Only consider offering odds on a race when you have also established that there
are two or more horses other than the favourite that are listed at 11/2 ($6.50) or
below.
7. Go to the betting exchange.
8. Offer one ten-cent increment above the TAB odds. (If it is $1.90 on the TAB,
offer $2 on the exchange).
9. Never offer odds of more than 2/1 ($3).
10. Always offer your odds on the favourite- and never on any other horse.
Remember that it is a horse you do not believe should be the short priced
favourite.
11. If no takers when you check with five minutes to post time, increase your offer
by another ten or fifteen cents (your choice).
12. Remember your ceiling price of $3.
13. Still no takers, no betting transactions for that race.
You are backing your judgement here, but not so as to lose a fortune if you are wrong.
Really serious staking, as a betting exchange bookmaker, can be extremely dangerous
for the novice. You must know your horses and know your percentages or you will be
taken to the cleaners.
This staking plan is something on which you would put your own limit as to how much
you can lose (this is all part of betting exchange technology and you cannot be claimed
for more than your limit).
For example if you indicate in your agreement that you are prepared to lose $100, and
you have set your price at $3, the exchange will not allow anybody to back the horse
with you for more than $33.
Progressive staking as a bookmaker on the exchange would require the same kind of
nerve that you have observed in every other bookmaker. While your staking plans all
hold good when you are backing a horse to win, the idea of backing it to lose, that is, of
being the bookmaker, is quite different.
Betting exchange staking plans associated with long price winners might look like a
quick way to make a fortune. After all, you do not expect a 100/1 selection to win. If
you are bookmaker and this is the only horse you have taken a bet on, and it wins, you
have lost big time. A hundred units, in fact.
The advantage of the plan outlined above is that, on single horse wagering, you are
going to be right some of the time, and the most you ever pay out is twice what you
can make (less the small take by the exchange). If you are a smart picker, and you can
identify the false favourite, you may well have an advantage here.
All the secrets you need to WIN!

Free and instant access to thousands of betting articles, staking plans & winning
strategies. All designed to help you win.

Staking Plans PDF

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Staking Plans PDF

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

ST

Thanks for downloading!

Over 80,000 members cant be wrong!

Everything you need to know about punting

Everything you need to know about punting

Level Stakes are the most common means of investment

Everything you need to know about punting

Everything you need to know about punting

Everything you need to know about punting

Great Strategies for Profitable Betting

HOW MUCH TO BET

Everything you need to know about punting

1. Only ever bet what you can afford, and

2. Always base your betting on your long-term expectations.

Everything you need to know about punting

Everything you need to know about punting

Great Strategies for Profitable Betting

1. Is it more successful than level stakes?

2. Can I operate it within my comfort zone?

Everything you need to know about punting

Everything you need to know about punting

Great Strategies for Profitable Betting

THE STAKING PLANS

2. THE GRADUAL INCLINE

3. LEVEL LOGICAL PROGRESSION

Everything you need to know about punting

Everything you need to know about punting

5. STOP AT A WINNER FOR THE DAY

7. THE ACTIVE/PASSIVE PLAN

Everything you need to know about punting

8. FIVE FIFTHS INSURANCE

9. ONE BET SAFETY

Everything you need to know about punting

10. STATISTICAL ASSUMPTIONS

Everything you need to know about punting

11. THE MONEYMAKER

2. It can be continuously profitable.

3. It is flexible enough to be adapted to most requirements.

4. It is very easy to operate and monitor.

PROGRESSION SCALE (at 20% profit demand)

Bet No. Stake Bet No Stake Bet No. Stake

Everything you need to know about punting

Everything you need to know about punting

12. THE $16 BANK PLAN

Everything you need to know about punting

13. THE WORKING ACCOUNT PLAN

14. A DAILY BANK METHOD

Everything you need to know about punting

15. THE PLACE-GETTER

The Rules Are Simple

16. DOUBLE PENDULUM STARTING PLAN

Everything you need to know about punting

Everything you need to know about punting

17. THE RESERVE FUND WAGERING PLAN

Everything you need to know about punting

Everything you need to know about punting

18. THE SIX POINT PLAN

Everything you need to know about punting

Everything you need to know about punting

19. ONE IN TEN AT 4/1

20. THE OPTIMISTS MODIFIED

Everything you need to know about punting

21. MULTIPLE BETS