See

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227782932

A disappearing biome? Reconsidering

landcover change in the Brazilian
savanna
Article in Geographical Journal June 2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2005.00153.x

CITATIONS

READS

109

236

1 author:
Wendy Jepson
Texas A&M University
26 PUBLICATIONS 586 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE

Available from: Wendy Jepson

Retrieved on: 03 November 2016

The Geographical Journal, Vol. 171, No. 2, June 2005, pp. 99111

A disappearing biome? Reconsidering land-cover

change in the Brazilian savanna

Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.

WENDY JEPSON
Department of Geography, 803D Eller O&M Building, Texas A&M University, College Station,
TX 77843-3147, USA
E-mail: wjepson@geog.tamu.edu
This paper was accepted for publication in February 2004
The Cerrado, the tropical savanna covering 22% of Brazils territory, or approximately
1.783 million km2, has suffered significant human impacts during the past three decades.
This paper re-examines estimates of Cerrado vegetation change dynamics using highresolution satellite remote sensing data from an area of interest extracted from eastern
Mato Grosso State. This region has undergone a high degree of typical agricultural
development since the early 1970s. Results indicate significant loss of original vegetation
as well as high levels of regeneration, suggesting Cerrado vegetation may be more resilient
to human impacts than catastrophic estimations suggest. The paper concludes with a
critical review of Cerrado land-cover change studies and the implications of evidence
for vegetation regeneration, land-cover dynamism and land-use intensification, paying
particular attention to spatial scale and research methods. The discussion concludes that
Cerrado land-cover change studied at a higher resolution and larger scales (smaller area)
is required to represent more effectively the complexity of land conversion for better
assessment of human impacts and environmental policy.
KEY WORDS: Brazil, land-cover change, tropical savanna, remote sensing, Cerrado,

environmental policy

Introduction

he Cerrado, a tropical savanna covering 22%

of Brazils territory or approximately 1.783
million km2, has suffered significant human
impacts during the past three decades (Figure 1).
Todays globally significant breadbasket hardly
resembles the Cerrado surveyed by the Royal Society/
Royal Geographical Society in the late 1960s (Brown
et al. 1970; Warnken 1999). Many environmental
activists and ecologists argue that the expansion of
cattle ranching and soybean cultivation in the
Cerrado is indicative of economic globalizations
voracious appetite for natural resources (Klink et al.
1993; Alho and Souza Martins 1995; Ratter et al.
1997; Branford and Freris 2000; WWF-Brasil 2000;
Fearnside 2001; Klink and Moreira 2002). Although
the view that the Cerrado is rapidly disappearing
has gained much currency in international environmental policy circles, high-resolution spatial analysis
has neither quantified the dynamics of Cerrado land0016-7398/05/0002-0001/$00.20/0

cover change nor specified the spatial processes of

vegetation fragmentation. The only estimates focus
on aggregate vegetation loss for the entire ecoregion. One estimate suggests that Cerrado landcover loss is outpacing the 13% or 400 000 km2 of
aggregate Brazilian rainforest loss (Ratter et al.
1997). Another argues that agro-pastoral land uses
have converted 40% of the Cerrado (Joly et al.
1999). Other studies use agricultural census data to
claim that approximately 50% of the Cerrado has
been eliminated (Alho and Souza Martins 1995,
34). A further estimate, based upon small cartographic scale (large area) satellite remote sensing,
is that only 35% of the Cerrado is in a relatively
natural state (Mantovani and Pereira 1998). A fifth
estimate indicates that humans have modified more
than 80% of the Cerrado, leaving only 20% of
original, native vegetation (WWF-Brasil 2000, 9;
Mittermeier et al. 2000).
Notwithstanding their quantitative disparities,
estimates of the disappearing Cerrado create
2005 The Royal Geographical Society

100

Reconsidering land-cover change in the Brazilian savanna

by a review of the land-cover change detection

analysis and results. The paper employs change
detection methods to describe the regions complex
landscape mosaics and mixtures of land cover
between 1986 and 1999. This type of high-resolution
analysis reveals how different land covers follow
time sequences and how these land covers are
often reversible for the same geographical unit. The
ensuing discussion section draws from the case of
Cerrado land-cover change in the study region to
discuss the importance of vegetation regeneration
and land-cover change dynamics, remote sensing
methodology, and environmental policy. The paper
concludes that the analysis offers a contrasting
view of Cerrado land conversion when compared
with current estimates. This disparity not only
holds implications for a better understanding of
the dynamic and process of Cerrado landscape
transformation, but also for scientific study of
biological diversity, climate change, and environmental policies.
Figure 1 Brazilian Cerrado and study region location

consensus around an environmental discourse of

biodiversity loss and attending agenda that promotes
protected areas for conservation. Key elements on
the agenda include consolidating current conservation units (only 5.2% of the Cerrado is protected
by some conservation regime), developing large
ecological corridors, and enhancing legislation to
protect undisturbed areas (Ratter et al. 1997; Silva
and Bates 2002; Calvalcanti and Joly 2002, 354 7).
With estimates indicating massive and rapid loss of
territorial biota to agro-pastoral activities, it seems
logical that the best path for biodiversity protection
is the swift demarcation of lands for preservation.
In practice, little else beyond the advocacy for
new or expanded protected areas of undisturbed
Cerrado is being pursued by environmental policymakers (Cavalcanti and Joly 2002).
This paper re-examines estimates of Cerrado
vegetation change dynamics. It tests the accuracy
of previously stated assessments of Cerrado transformation using high-resolution satellite remote
sensing data. This approach allows for a comparison
of overall estimates on Cerrado land conversion with
an area of interest extracted from eastern Mato
Grosso State, a region in the Brazilian Cerrado that
has undergone a high degree of agricultural development since the early 1970s (Figure 1). The paper
begins with an overview of Cerrado biogeography
and the study region in eastern Mato Grosso. Next,
the paper discusses the processing and classification of the satellite remote sensing data, followed

The Brazilian Cerrado and Eastern Mato Grosso

The Brazilian Cerrado is characterized by an
undulating topography with wide interfluves interrupted by tributaries of the Amazon, ParanParaguay, and the So Francisco Rivers. The Cerrado
vegetation is a mix of grasses, woody plants, fireresistant twisted trees with thick, corky bark,
sclerophyllous leaves, and vibrant flowers. The
Cerrado originally covered a region equivalent to
the combined areas of California, Nevada, Utah,
Colorado, Arizona and New Mexico, spanning a
geographic area from 24 S to 4 S latitudes. The
ecoregion varies in elevation (3001800 m) with
annual precipitation between 900 and 1800 mm
and an average monthly temperature of 21C
(AbSaber 1971; Goedert 1983, 407; EMBRAPACerrados 1998). The climate is punctuated by a
severe dry season that ranges between three and
five months from May to September. The Brazilian
Cerrado is a repository of biological diversity,
boasting an estimated 160 000 species of plants,
mammals, fungi and notably diverse flora, showing
high specificity of native angiosperms (Alho 1981;
Silberbauer Gottsberger and Gottsberger 1984;
Mares et al. 1986; Redford and Fonseca 1986; Ratter
et al. 1997, 226; Myers et al. 2000; Silva and Bates
2002).
Canopy cover, type of plant cover and species
composition distinguish the Cerrados diverse
vegetation structure. Cerrado vegetation varies in
height and density. The vegetation ranges from an
open herbaceous land cover to orchard-like tree
scrub savanna or almost a closed canopy of 1215
m. In addition to the savanna vegetation and forest

Reconsidering land-cover change in the Brazilian savanna

formations, seasonal savannas are present to a lesser

extent in the Cerrado region. Land covers studied
in the paper are based upon types found in the
study region. They include the following: (1) Cerrado
(sensu lato), (2) seasonally inundated savannas, and
(3) forests (Ribeiro and Walter 1998; Oliveira Filho
and Ratter 2002). Three general land covers can be
further classified into subtypes. Cerrado sensu latu
is most common in the ecoregion, and it can be
subdivided into three types: campo cerrados (grasses);
cerrado sensu stricto (savanna); and cerrado
(woodland). Seasonal savannas can be further
subdivided into parque do cerrado (parkland) and
vereda. Forest formations, including riparian and
mesophytic, represent the third broad land cover in
the Cerrado and study region. These landscape
vegetation differences within the biome are determined by fire, plant-available moisture and
nutrients in soils, and topography (Coutinho 1977
1982; Goodland and Pollard 1973; Oliveira-Filho
et al. 1989; Furley 1994 1996 1999; Kaufman et al.
1994; Bilbao et al. 1996; Ratter et al. 1997, 225;
Mistry 1998, 4302; 2000).
Concern for biological diversity loss due to rapid
land conversion drives the Cerrado environmental
conservation agenda. The Cerrado ranks twelfth on
a list of global hot spot areas, ecoregions that
contain high levels of plant endemism and are
under threat (Mittermeier et al. 1998, 519). The
hot spot designation shapes the actions of various
environmental organizations, in particular Conservation International (CI), which develops and
supports conservation priority setting workshops
(Government of Brasil and FUNATURA 1999;
Cavalcanti and Joly 2002; CI 2003). National and
global partnerships for Cerrado conservation also
have focused on improving national and state parks
or encouraged local, sustainable uses of the regions
biodiversity. For example, the Brazilian environmental organization FUNATURA along with the
Global Environmental Facility (GEF) are expanding
protected areas near major Cerrado parks through
the establishment of private national heritage reserves
(Reservas Particulares do Patromnio Nacional,
RPPNs) (Lake 1999; GEF 2003; FUNATURA
2003). Moreover, FUNATURA and The Nature
Conservancy jointly manage the 84 000 ha Grande
Serto Veredas National Park, a conservation unit
established under Brazils only debt-for-nature
swap.
The case study is located in eastern Mato Grosso
state, a region located on the low-relief Serra do
Roncador Plateau between the Xingu River, a
southern Amazon tributary, and the Araguaia River.
The regions vegetation cover is typical of the
Cerrado. It ranges from campo limpo to cerrado,
as described in a set of reports from a geographical

101

expedition (Askew et al. 1970; Brown et al. 1970,

3712). The study regions northern reach forms
the transition belt between the savanna and the dry
tropical forest.
Private agricultural colonization has played an
integral role in the conversion of the Cerrado to
agriculture (Jepson 2003). Eastern Mato Grosso is a
relatively older agro-pastoral region in which local
farmers practiced intensive land uses common in
other Cerrado areas. Beginning in the early 1970s,
more than 800 families from southern Brazil joined
a colonization cooperative or purchased land from
a private colonization firm to settle in eastern Mato
Grossos Cerrado. These colonization projects initiated almost a decade of migration from southern
Brazilian states to municipalities of Canarana, gua
Boa, and Nova Xavantina (Figure 2). By 1990,
private colonization initiatives had sold more than
460 040 ha in 25 projects in the regions Cerrado.
Major agricultural activities at present include
cattle ranching and annual cultivation of upland
rice, maize and soybeans.

Figure 2 Eastern Mato Grosso and area of interest

102

Reconsidering land-cover change in the Brazilian savanna

Table 1 Landsat data

Mission

Sensor

Date

Path/row

LANDSAT 5
LANDSAT 5
LANDSAT 7

TM
TM
+ETM

26 September 1986
17 August 1992
21 August 1999

224/69
224/69
224/69

Remote sensing methods

Data processing
Three Landsat high-spatial resolution satellite images
were acquired for the years 1986, 1992 and 1999.
An area of interest (3896 km2) was extracted from
the images and examined in a change detection
analysis (Figure 2). The area of interest (AOI)
covers major areas of settlement and colonization.
Two Landsat images and one Landsat +ETM image,
all of which have a spatial resolution of 30 m
30 m, were obtained at a six- and seven-year interval,
respectively. Near-anniversary date images, which
cover one Landsat scene, minimize the effects of
seasonal phenological differences that may cause
spurious change to be detected in the analysis. To
reduce scene-to-scene variability, all ground data
were collected during the dry season, between
August and September (Table 1).
Geometric and radiometric corrections followed
standard processing methods (Jensen 1996). Landsat
data (bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7) were geometrically
rectified to the UTM (22-S) coordinate system to
create an objective spatial basis for comparing the
three scenes. The 1999 scene was resampled to a
common coordinate system using over 100 ground
control points distributed throughout the image and
obtained by a global positioning system, a Garmin
GPS base station system with an accuracy of between
5 and 10 m. All subsequent scenes were rectified
to the UTM coordinates by resampling each to the
corresponding 1999 image. The AOI was extracted
from the data in the resampling process. Radiometric
corrections took into account the sensor parameters
for 1999 +ETM to transform the original digital
numbers into surface reflectance measurements. The
1999 image, which was corrected for the sensor
gain and bias, was used as a reference image to
reduce the effects of sensor difference when
comparing the 1986 and 1992 images. The output
images and the reference image were classified and
subsequently used in change detection process.
Unsupervised classification
Landsat bands 3 (visible red), 4 (near infrared) and
5 (mid-infrared) were selected from the original

data set to reduce the processing time, data volume,

and band data correlation. Preliminary data exploration was conducted using bands 2, 3 and 4. The
conclusion was that the chosen bands better distinguished land covers of interest. Bands 3, 4, and 5
combined to make a composite 8-bit image that was
the input for the self-iterative module (ISOCLUST)
for cluster seeding. The iterative process follows
the maximum likelihood procedure to assign each
pixel to 19 clusters. Once the clusters were established, land covers were identified, assigned, and
aggregated into three basic classes.
1 Cerrado. This class includes cerrado sensu latu
(campos cerrados, cerrado sensu strito, and cerrado)
and seasonal savannas.
2 Forests. This class includes seasonally dry tropical
and riparian forests.
3 Agro-pastoral. This class includes all pastures and
agricultural fields.
Based upon knowledge of the regions environment, ground data and general reflectances, land
covers were assigned to clusters. Problems arose in
the classification process whereby burnt Cerrado
and water were difficult to distinguish in the cluster
process. Two categories were aggregated into the
Cerrado class, as the overall area of water was very
limited and would not significantly alter the final
analysis of change. This is evident in the final
accuracy assessment table. Areas of burnt Cerrado
were concluded not to be agricultural fields, and
thus could be aggregated logically into the Cerrado
land cover. Spectral reflectances of areas, satellite
data before and after the date of burning, and field
knowledge of the region indicate that this land area
was not cultivated for that time period; thus, the
burning scars represented wildfire in the Cerrado,
not agricultural fire used for cropland or pasture
renewal.
Ground data were used to assess the accuracy
of the unsupervised classification. Between July
and August 2000, detailed ground observations
of vegetation cover were collected to assess the
accuracy of unsupervised land-cover classification
on the 1999 TM image. Over 160 land-cover
polygons provided at least 30 pixels for 16 land
classes. Land classes included bare soil, millet
fields, no-till agriculture, various types of pasture,
relative densities of Cerrado vegetation and forest
formations. No attempt to carry out statistically
based sampling was made. Rather, all ground
observations were made based on access to land
and roads and permission to enter private property.
All field observations were geo-referenced with a
global positioning system, a Garmin GPS hand-held
and base station system with accuracy between 5
and 10 m. Polygons were mapped and converted

Reconsidering land-cover change in the Brazilian savanna

103

Table 2 Contingency table and accuracy indicators for classified image (1999)
Ground truth data
Cerrado

Agro-pastoral

Water

Total pixels

Accuracy (%)
95.34
0
97.56

Cerrado
Forest
Agro-pastoral

2294
21
106

19
0
4238

93
0
0

2406
21
4344

Total
Class accuracy
Overall accuracy
Overall kappa

2421
94.75
96.47
92.48

4257
99.55

93
0

6771

to a raster file. This file was compared with the

unsupervised classification for the 1999 image to
assess classification accuracy.
A contingency table, which summarizes the
accuracy of the initial classification to ground data,
established overall accuracy and Kappa Index of
Agreement for the 1999 image (Table 2). Observations were recorded as the number of pixels
selected for three classes (Cerrado, Agro-pastoral
and Water). Forest was not identified during the
ground data exercise due to lack of access to these
land covers during fieldwork. Riparian areas were
densely vegetated and difficult to access; forest
tracts also were inaccessible by paths or roads.
However, the spectral reflectances of forest and
riparian vegetation are clearly distinguished from
Cerrado and agro-pastoral areas. Thus, this lack of
ground truth information was not detrimental to the
overall classification process.
The overall accuracy for the 1999 unsupervised
classification exceeded minimum targets of an
overall accuracy of 85% with no class less than
70% accurate (Congalton 1991; Foody 2002).
The Kappa Index of Agreement, which takes into
consideration chance agreement, also was above
the minimum 85% threshold. The important error
to note is of commission. Forested areas were not
identified in the ground data, but some forest
areas were classified for Cerrado. This can be
explained by the confusion of very dense cerrado
with forest. Accuracy of the unsupervised classifications for 1986 and 1992 could not be assessed
as the necessary ground data, such as aerial
photos, either do not exist or were unavailable at
the time of analysis. Although no ground data
were available for those dates, standard image
processing protocol was followed for radiometric
rectification to guarantee that the change detected
in the image was not due to simple radiometric
noise or differences in the sensors gains or biases.

Table 3 Land-cover change matrices, 1986 92 and 19929

1992

1986

Cerrado
Non-Cerrado

Area (km2)
Area (km2)

Cerrado

Non-Cerrado

1274
526.10

635.32
1460.96
1999

1992

Cerrado
Non-Cerrado

Area (km2)
Area (km2)

Cerrado

Non-Cerrado

1096.31
426.16

703.79
1668.12

Land-cover change detection

Analysis
Change detection for this study was developed in
two stages. First, land-cover change analysis used
Boolean or binary land cover maps (i.e. Cerrado
Non-Cerrado) to compare a set of two successive
classified images, 198892 and 19929. Postclassification change detection produced a change
detection matrix (Table 3). The change detection
matrix identifies, pixel by pixel, detailed information
about the land-cover status, and it indicates landcover changes (i.e. from Cerrado to agro-pastoral)
for the same geographic area at the highest resolution allowed for this database. One major advantage
of this method is that this fromto is directional
information, but the analyst always needs to
consider that the process is dependent upon the
accuracy of land-cover classification (Jensen 1996,
269). In this case, the accuracy was greater than
minimum standards for classification (Table 2).

104

Reconsidering land-cover change in the Brazilian savanna

Table 4 Cerrado land-cover sequences between 1986 and 1999 (area and proportion of total affected by each trajectory)
1986

1992

1999

Description

Proportion (%)

km2

Non-Cerrado
Cerrado
Non-Cerrado
Cerrado
Non-Cerrado
Cerrado
Non-Cerrado
Cerrado

Non-Cerrado
Non-Cerrado
Cerrado
Cerrado
Non-Cerrado
Non-Cerrado
Cerrado
Cerrado

Non-Cerrado
Non-Cerrado
Non-Cerrado
Non-Cerrado
Cerrado
Cerrado
Cerrado
Cerrado

Stable forest or agro-pastoral

Older Cerrado clearing
Clearing in Cerrado regrowth
Recent Cerrado clearing
Recent Cerrado regrowth
Cerrado regrowth in previously cleared area
Older Cerrado regrowth
Stable Cerrado

32.6
10.19
7.3
10.77
4.89
6.11
6.21
21.93

1270.96
397.16
284.20
419.59
190
238.16
241.90
854.41

No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Total

100

3896.38

Table 5 Estimated area of Cerrado, total (gross) converted area, and conversion rate in area of interest, 198699

Year

No.
years

1986

Estimated area
of Cerrado (km2)

Cerrado
converted (%)

Converted area
per year (km2)

Annual conversion
rate (% per year)

634.69

33.24

105.78

5.54

703.80

36.86

100.54

5.26

1338.49

70.10

102.96

5.39

1909.32
6

1992

1272.74
7

1999
Overall

Total
converted (km2)

1096.32
13

The second step established a multiple sequence

of land-cover change that revealed pixel-by-pixel
shifts in land cover over the entire 13-year period
(198619921999). This approach discloses shifts
between different land covers for the same
geographic area during the two observation years
(Mertens and Lambin 2000). To achieve this result,
the binary maps (Cerrado Non-Cerrado) for each
set of observation years were cross classified.
These results were again cross classified to create
all eight possible land-cover sequences. Total land
area and proportion of land area for each landcover trajectory were calculated (Table 4). Eight
possible land-cover sequences are represented on
the maps as separate coverages. Two classes of the
final table represent stable land covers (stable
forest or agro-pastoral = 1; stable Cerrado = 8). The
other classes define a series of possible conversion
scenarios during the 13-year period. It is also
important to note that the ecological condition of
Cerrado regrowth after agro-pastoral land uses is
unknown as there are no studies on this topic in
the broader biogeographical or botanical literature.
The eight land-cover sequences are
1 Stable forest or agropastoral land cover. No change
detected.

2 Older Cerrado clearing. This sequence represents

a shift from Cerrado in 1986 to non-Cerrado by
1992.
3 Clearing in Cerrado regrowth. Previously cleared
Cerrado experienced regrowth between 1986 and
1992; the area was again cleared between 1992 and
1999.
4 Recent Cerrado clearing. Cerrado cleared only
between 1992 and 1999.
5 Recent Cerrado regrowth. Pre-1986 cleared areas
were allowed to regenerate between 1992 and
1999.
6 Cerrado regrowth in recently cleared area. Cerrado
that experienced clearing between 1986 and 1992;
the area was allowed to regenerate between 1992
and 1999.
7 Cerrado regrowth in pre-1986 cleared area. Cerrado
regeneration on areas cleared before 1986.
8 Stable Cerrado land cover. No change detected in
Cerrado change during the time series.
Results
Change detection matrices for the successive years
198692 and 19929 reveal an accumulated or
gross reduction of 1986 Cerrado by 1338.49 km2,

Reconsidering land-cover change in the Brazilian savanna

105

Table 6 Estimated area of Cerrado, net converted area, and conversion rate in area of interest, 1986 99

Year

No.
years

1986

Estimated area
of Cerrado (km2)

Cerrado
converted (%)

Converted area
per year (km2)

Annual conversion
rate (%)

109.22

5.72

18.18

0.95

275.63

14.43

39.32

1.97

384.85

20.15

29.60

1.55

1909.32
6

1992

1272.74
7

1999
Overall

Net converted
(km2)

1096.32
13

but only a net reduction of 384.85 km2. This

indicates relatively high levels of vegetation regeneration over the 13-year period. Table 5 summarizes the total or accumulated Cerrado land-cover
change between 1986 and 1999. Total Cerrado
loss measured for this area of interest between
1986 and 1999 is 70.10%. The rate of total or
gross annual Cerrado loss, that is, the rate of
Cerrado converted without consideration of regeneration, is 102.96 km2 per year or 5.39%. Over the
observation years, there is a slight decrease in area
converted per year, from 105.78 to 100.54 km2 per
year. Between 1986 and 1992, the annual conversion rate is 5.54%, while between 1992 and 1999
the annual conversion rate declined to 5.26%.
Vegetation regeneration represents an important
contribution to overall land cover between 1986
and 1999 (Table 6). Overall net loss of Cerrado
vegetation is 20.15% (384.85 km2), or 50% less
than total Cerrado loss, as it accounts for the difference between Cerrado area converted and the area
of Cerrado regeneration. That is, 50% of Cerrado
converted during some of this period of time
experienced regeneration. While the total annual
rate of Cerrado loss decreases over time, the net
annual rate of conversion experiences a rise
between 1992 and 1999. During the first time
period (198692), net Cerrado loss is 0.95% and
during the second time period it rises to 1.97%.
Change detection matrices permit the description
of complex landscape mosaics and mixtures of
land cover (Table 4). Land classes follow multiple
time sequences and are often reversible over more
than two observation years. Over 45% (1771 km2)
of the total land area shifted at least once and
13.4% (522.36 km2) of the total land area shifted
land cover twice. Rates of conversion from tropical
savanna to agro-pastoral land covers are generally
stable over the 13-year period. Older Cerrado
clearing (between 1986 and 1992) represents
10.19% (397.16 km2) and recent Cerrado clearing
(between 1992 and 1999) is 10.77% (419.59 km2).
Stable or continuously Cerrado areas only account

for 21.93% (854.41 km2) while stable forests account

for 3.3% (128.25 km2) and stable agro-pastoral
accounts for 29.2% (1142.71 km2) of total land
cover between 1986 and 1999.
Discussion
Rapid Cerrado disappearance is attributed to modern
agro-pastoral land uses, particularly soybean
production and cattle ranching. Most explanations of
environmental change broadly generalize the process
as a unidirectional loss of vegetation to agricultural
land uses. As reviewed in the introduction,
estimates of Cerrado vegetation loss speculate that
modern agro-pastoral expansion has converted up
to 80% of the savanna and that the pace of change
is increasing. As a first attempt to quantify anthropogenic Cerrado land-cover change using highresolution data for a sample region, this study
indicates high levels of vegetation regeneration,
although overall Cerrado loss is still high in the
long-occupied Cerrado agro-pastoral region. The
following discussion will review the implications of
the evidence for vegetation regeneration, land-cover
dynamism and land-use intensification, paying
particular attention to spatial scale and research
methods. The discussion concludes that Cerrado
land-cover change studied at a higher resolution and
larger scales (smaller area) is required to represent
more effectively the complexity of land conversion
to better inform policymakers.
Vegetation regeneration: scalar implications
The implications of vegetation regeneration for
understanding Cerrado land cover vary according
to geographical scale. First, at the landscape scale,
data from this analysis indicate large areas of
regenerated and fragmented undisturbed Cerrado,
vegetation that has not been under agro-pastoral
land uses. Most revealing is that over 50% of land
cover identified as Cerrado was reversible, representing some form of secondary vegetation land

106

Reconsidering land-cover change in the Brazilian savanna

cover. Currently there are few published studies on

the regeneration capacity of Cerrado environments
after land clearing for agro-pastoral uses. The
exceptions are Durigan et al. (1998) and research
on Cerrado regeneration after Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus citriodora) plantations in western So Paulo
state (Durigan et al. 1997). Overall, a lack of
detailed scientific information on regeneration
limits the broader claims about ecological integrity
of secondary stands that could be drawn from
evidence of Cerrado regrowth. However, the
relatively high levels of regrowth broadly suggests
resiliency rather than vulnerability after agropastoral land uses have ceased. In addition, many
Cerrado fragments that have not been ploughed
under for agro-pastoral land uses still persist,
despite continued developments of the agricultural
economy.
The documented presence of remaining Cerrado
fragments begs the question of their influence on
biotic and abiotic processes. First, biodiversity
assessments, which are of particular concern to
Cerrado ecologists, would be better served by
considering the ecological implications of patches,
fragment connectivity, corridors and edge characteristics of secondary growth and Cerrado
fragments (Dale et al. 1994; Forman 1995; Dauber
et al. forthcoming). Second, by focusing on regenerated fragments in the complex cultivated Cerrado
landscape, future studies may better assess their
ecological integrity rather than rely on the theoretical assessment of biodiversity loss, which is based
solely on global land-cover change estimates
prevalent in the environmental literature (WWFBrasil 2000; Myers et al. 2000; Mittermeier et al.
2000; Wood et al. 2000). Once secondary growth
is taken into account, more precise accounts may
be made of how the regions habitat fragmentation
and regeneration affect biodiversity, such as
displacement of native grasses (Pivello et al. 1999)
and wildlife (Tubelis and Cavalcanti 2000; Marini
2001; Bates 2002). Consequently, environmental
policies based on observed patterns are better
suited to intervene more precisely rather than
simply salvaging (Colchester 1997) large territories for Cerrado preservation and leaving remaining
Cerrado sacrificed for agro-pastoral development.
Evidence of regeneration also raises new
questions about societynature interactions within
the entire ecoregion. Previous characterizations of
Cerrado conversion simply describe the capacity of
modern agricultural systems to ravage the natural
landscape, driven as they are by profit and
dominated by large-scale soybean monoculture
and cattle ranches (Alho and Souza Martins 1995;
Ratter et al. 1997; Branford and Freris 2000; WWFBrasil 2000; Fearnside 2001). One would expect

this pattern of land use to be reflected in the satellite data. Yet, in eastern Mato Grosso, a region that
has undergone considerable agricultural development since the early 1970s, land-cover dynamics
reflect a different trajectory, one that appears more
complex and dynamic than simply large-scale
farming and ranching. Moreover, looking at rates of
Cerrado loss suggests an intensification of land use;
land, which was allowed to regenerate previously,
is being renovated for continued cultivation or
pasture. Both of these findings require an investigation of the precise causes of land-use change at the
scale of individual land manager (McCracken et al.
1999; Perz and Walker 2002; Southworth and
Tucker 2001). For example, studies of fire as an
ecological transformation factor or a maintenance
tool and its role at different moments in the landcover change trajectory, may be better understood
at the landscape scale (Eva and Lambin 2000, 773).
This would focus consideration of land-cover
change on the decision-making processes behind
the patterns of regeneration, loss and fragmentation
at the landscape scale, rather than on vague
drivers of global capitalism (Klink et al. 1993;
WWF-Brasil 2000). Environmental policy prescriptions that follow from individual land-resource user
dynamics, those that capitalize on the preservation
of Cerrado fragments and regeneration, may offer
alternative conservation policies to current topdown, park-oriented efforts (Brannstrom 2001).
These may include productive conservation initiatives (Hall 1997), watershed management approaches
(Brannstrom 2001), and more effective incentives
for RPPNs (Lake 1999).
Finally, the presence of vegetation regeneration
calls into question the aggregate estimates of
Cerrado conversion or, perhaps, explains the divergent speculation reviewed in the introduction.
Between 1986 and 1999, the case study area has
experienced gross or aggregate vegetation loss,
which approaches the worst-case estimates of
Cerrado conversion. However, the observed landcover complexity illustrates significant processes of
vegetation regrowth which significantly changes
the net vegetation loss estimates.
The importance of quantifying the reversibility of
land covers, identifying complex trajectories, and
assessing the landscape fragmentation has important implications for broader global environmental
change concerns of ecological services, not just
biodiversity (Woodwell 2002). An accurate assessment of secondary vegetation growth better
specifies the contribution of Cerrado land conversion and agro-pastoral land uses to overall carbon
emissions and climate change (Henderson-Sellers
and McGuffie 1995), such as carbon sequestration
(Miranda and Miranda 2000; Vourlitis et al. 2001),

Reconsidering land-cover change in the Brazilian savanna

greenhouse gas emissions (Kirchhoff and Avala 1996;

Lardy et al. 2002; Pinto et al. 2002), and biomass
burning (Ferek et al. 1998; Kisselle et al. 2002).
The irony is that the type of investigation outlined
above has been carried out for years in the humid
forests of Amaznia (Moran et al. 1994 1996;
Fearnside 1996 1997; Moran and Brondizio 1998;
Steininger 1996 2000; Zarin et al. 2001; Lucas et al.
2002); perhaps, it is time for similar approaches to
be employed for that biomes southern neighbour.
Studying Cerrado land-cover change: remote sensing
and census data
Studies of Cerrado land-cover change have only
begun to assess the effects of post-1970 human
impacts. Primary data used to explore these transformations include remote sensing and agricultural
census material. Both data sets offer important
insights into the process of Cerrado conversion.
However, findings on vegetation regeneration support
a methodological re-evaluation. In particular, the
evidence for vegetation regeneration highlights
analytical problems associated with studies that
employ a subjective land-cover classification system,
single change detection matrix, and agricultural
census data, all of which contribute to an environmental zero-sum discourse of Cerrado land-cover
change and represent the biome as disappearing
grain by grain. Indeed, the reliance on irreversible land-cover change estimates may overestimate
Cerrado loss because they are unable to identify
vegetation regeneration. This would not be the first
time that local, quantitative methods have corrected
or reframed (mis)readings of the tropical savanna
landscapes (Fairhead and Leach 1996 1998; Bassett
and Zueli 2000).
More broadly, a critique of remote sensing
methods is useful to evaluate the limited number of
available Cerrado land-cover change studies. As
one geographer observes, the categories of analysis
which a remote sensing practitioner employs to
represent vegetation are not impartial tools to
measure land-cover change; rather, in many
instances, they fix certain interpretations of the
environment, interpretations that are either political
or based on subjective assumptions about nature
(Robbins 2001). My interest is not to go as far as
Robbinss post-structuralist position that all landcover classifications are political. However, I agree
that the act of naming and describing land covers
must be qualitatively as well as quantitatively interrogated. This, in turn, reveals how subjective views
of humansociety interaction shape certain interpretive practices in remote sensing analysis.
Mantovani and Pereira (1998) is the only publicly
available study using satellite data to assess Cerrado

107

conversion to agro-pastoral activities. The study

compares a digitized vegetation map (1:5 000 000)
to 144 Landsat images from 1988 to 1993.1 In this
study, the perceived impact of human activity
defines land-cover categories. The authors use a
classification system that includes categories such
as not Cerrado, Cerrado not anthropogenically
altered, Cerrado anthropogenically altered, and
Cerrado strongly anthropogenically altered. There
are two problems with Mantovani and Pereiras
categorization. First, the study does not provide a
clear discussion of how categories are developed
or how ground data are collected to test coverage
accuracy. Second, their assumptions about nature
underpin the categories, reinforcing the notion of
land cover irreversibility. That is, the level of
naturalness is the defining feature of each land
cover rather than its physical characteristics. Not
only is this definition highly subjective, but it
forecloses the possibility that secondary growth is a
land cover worth assessing in an overall project to
quantify vegetation change. Similar arguments can
be applied to how Mantovani and Pereira construct
the land-cover change matrix. Simply comparing
two data sets, one an ancillary small (cartographic)
scale vegetation map representing a baseline2 and
the other a set of Landsat data, to identify biome
change, also precludes the study of vegetation
regeneration or land-cover dynamics. Despite these
serious methodological shortcomings, the categories used by Mantovani and Pereira are fixed in
the quantification of Cerrado land-cover change
and these estimates are reproduced as objective
in multiple publications to bolster the view of a
disappearing biome (Government of Brasil and
FUNATURA 1999; WWF-Brasil 2000; Joly et al.
1999).
Agricultural census data have provided another
means to examine how the Cerrado has been transformed over the past 30 years. Two high-profile
publications use municipal level (county-level)
agricultural production data to estimate the pattern
and extent of land uses central to Cerrado landcover change biodiversity loss (Alho and Souza
Martins 1995; WWF-Brasil 2000). In both cases,
land-cover change is equated with annual cropping
area and artificial pasture. Thus, agricultural
production is a proxy measure for land-cover
change. That is, for every hectare of production, 1
ha of Cerrado habitat is lost. The cumulative effect
is interpreted as a loss in biodiversity.
Observed vegetation regrowth, however, undermines the use of agricultural census data for
estimating land-cover change. First, agricultural
census data do not offer any means to represent
vegetation regeneration. Second, increases in
annual cropping or pasture are represented as

108

Reconsidering land-cover change in the Brazilian savanna

permanently replacing original vegetation even

though they may not necessarily cause Cerrado
loss (Angelsen and Kaimowitz 2001, 3). There are
other drawbacks to using agricultural census data
to estimate land-cover change. Besides possible
problems in obtaining accurate agricultural census
data for these relatively remote regions, the proxy
data only provide snapshot views of the land
cover. These cannot accurately represent the
changes of land uses for a specific area smaller
than a county. They cannot capture the dynamic
that one field, for example, undergoes multiple
changes over time and different uses from fallow
to pasture to annual crops. In conclusion, agricultural census data should not substitute measures of
land-cover change with easily available satellite data.
Conclusion
Is the Cerrado disappearing? The Cerrado has
undergone tremendous transformation over the last
three decades, from the isolated savanna described
in the expedition published in The Geographical
Journal to the global agricultural breadbasket of
today. However, assessments that one of Brazils
largest ecoregions is losing space misrepresent
and oversimplify the land-cover change dynamics
on the ground. Results using high-resolution digital
satellite data of land cover over multiple time
periods indicate significant loss of original vegetation as well as high levels of regeneration, suggesting that Cerrado vegetation may be more resilient
to human impacts than the catastrophic estimations
suggest. A shift in the focus of current studies of
Cerrado change to one of the landscape and mesoscale is necessary to assess more reliably the
complexity of human impacts. Transparent methods
of assessment that focus on high-resolution data
analysis, employ multiple-year change detection
methods, and provide clear land-cover classifications are necessary to shift from aggregate
perceived loss to vegetation and landscape
dynamics. This shift will allow for a conceptual
remapping of humanenvironment relations in the
Cerrado that includes anthropogenic landscapes
and vegetation regrowth in the scenario of environmental conservation. Rather than focusing on the
disappearance of the Cerrado, a more insightful
question could be posed: why are areas of the
cultivated Cerrado landscapes preserved or allowed
to regenerate? The answer to this question opens
analytical space to explore complex changes in
the landscape, particularly, the importance of
secondary growth. A clear understanding of these
processes could provide a better scientific basis
that may focus future environmental policy
initiatives.

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the National Science Foundation

(Geography and Regional Science Program, Dissertation Improvement Grant, SBR-99485), the Organization of American States (PRA-1328) and the
Latin American Center at the University of California, Los Angeles for funding the purchase of satellite data and supporting the in-country travel and
fieldwork. I would like to thank Donald Sawyer at
the Instituto de Sociedade Populao e Natureza
(ISPN, Institute of Society, Population and Nature)
in Braslia, Hugo de Souza Dias, Otvio de Souza
Dias, Christian Brannstrom, and Thomas Gillespie.
Notes
1 Other remote sensing studies of the Cerrado evaluate landcover changes in parks (Almeida-Filho and Vitorello 1997) or
characterize agricultural settlements (Passos 1998).
2 See Brannstrom (2002) for a critique of the Brazilian Geography and Statistics Institute (IBGE) vegetation map as an
empirical baseline.

References
AbSaber A N 1971 A organizao natural das paisagens e subtropicais brasileiras in Ferri M ed III Simposio sobre o Cerrado Editora Universidade de So Paulo, So Paulo 114
Alho C J R 1981 Small mammal populations of the Brazilian
Cerrado: the dependence of abundance and diversity on habitat complexity Revista Brasileira de Biologia 41 22330
Alho C J R and Souza Martins E de 1995 De Gro em Gro, o
Cerrado Perde Espao (Cerrado Impactos do Processo de
Ocupao) WWF-Brasil, Braslia, DF
Almeida-Filho R and Vitorello I 1997 Remote sensing and field
data in the definition of hydrothermically altered areas in
vegetated terrains, central Brazil International Journal of
Remote Sensing 18 183542
Angelsen A and Kaimowitz D 2001 Agricultural technologies
and tropical deforestation Cabi Publications in association
with Center for International Forestry Research, New York
Askew G P, Moffat D J, Montgomery R F and Searl P L 1970
Soil landscapes in northeastern Mato Grosso Geographical
Journal 136 21027
Bassett T and Zueli K 2000 Environmental discourses and the
Ivorian savanna Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90 6795
Bates J M 2002 The genetic effects of forest fragmentation on
five species of Amazonian birds Journal of Avian Biology 33
27695
Bilbao B, Braithwaite R, DallAglio C, Moreira A, Oliveira P E,
Ribeiro J F and Stott P 1996 Biodiversity, fire, and herbivory
in tropical savannas in Solbrig M ed Biodiversity and savanna
ecosystem processes Springer, Berlin 197203
Branford S and Freris N 2000 One great big hill of beans The
Ecologist 30 467
Brannstrom C 2001 Conservation-with-development models in

Reconsidering land-cover change in the Brazilian savanna

Brazils agro-pastoral landscapes World Development 29
134559
Brannstrom C 2002 Rethinking the Atlantic Forest of Brazil:
new evidence for land cover and land value in Western So
Paulo, 19001930 Journal of Historical Geography 28 420
39
Brown E H, Askew G P, Thornes J B, Young A, Townshend J R G
and Daultery S G 1970 Geographical research on the Royal
Society/Royal Geographical Societys expedition to Northeastern Mato Grosso, Brazil: a symposium Geographical
Journal 136 365409
Cavalcanti R B and Joly C A 2002 Biodiversity and conservation priorities in the Cerrado region in Oliveira P S and
Marquis R J eds The cerrados of Brazil Columbia University
Press, New York 35167
Colchester M 1997 Salvaging nature: indigenous people and
protected areas in Ghimire K B and Pimbert M P eds Social
change and conservation: environmental politics and impacts
of national parks and protected areas Earthscan Publications,
London 97130
Congalton R G 1991 A review of assessing the accuracy of
classification of remotely sensed data Remote Sensing of the
Environment 37 3547
Conservation International (CI) 2003 Cerrado-biodiveristy hotpots
(vital signs) (http://www.biodiversityhotspots.org/xp/Hotspots/
cerrado/?showpage=ConservationAction/ ) Accessed 1 July
Coutinho L 1977 Aspetos ecolgicos do fogo no cerrado. II. As
queimadas e a disperso de sementes em algumas espcies
anemorcoricas do estrato herbaceo-subarbustivo Boletim
Botnica 5 5764
Coutinho L 1982 Ecological effects of fire in Brazilian Cerrado
in Huntley B J and Walker B H eds Ecology of tropical
savannas Springer, Berlin 27391
Dale V H, Pearson S M, Offerman H L and ONeill R V 1994
Relating patterns of land-use change to faunal biodiversity in
the central Amazon Conservation Biology 8 102736
Dauber J, Hirsch M, Simmering D, Waldhardt R, Otte A and
Wolters V forthcoming Landscape structure as an indicator of
biodiversity: matrix effects on species richness Agriculture,
Ecosystems and Environment
Durigan G, Contieri W A, Franco G A D C and Garrido M A
O 1998 Induo do processo de regenerao da vegetao
de cerrado em rea de pastagem, Assis, SP Acta Botanica
Brasileira 12 (Suppl) 4219
Durigan G, Franco, G A D C, Pastore J A and Aguiar O T
1997 Regenerao natural da vegetao de cerrado sob
floresta de Eucalyptus citriodora Revista do Instituto Florestal
(So Paulo) 9 7185
EMBRAPA-Cerrados 1998 EMBRAPA-Cerrados e a Regio dos
Cerrados: Informaes Bsicas e Dados Estatsticos
EMBRAPA-Cerrados, Planaltina, DF
Eva H and Lambin E F 2000 Fires and land-cover change in the
tropics: a remote sensing analysis at the landscape scale Journal of Biogeography 27 76576
Fairhead J and Leach M 1996 Misreading the African landscape: society and ecology in a forestsavanna mosaic Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

109

Fairhead J and Leach M 1998 Reframing deforestation: global

analysis and local realities: Studies in West Africa Routledge,
London
Fearnside P M 1996 Amazonian deforestation and global
warming: carbon stock in vegetation replacing Brazils Amazon Forest Forest Ecology and Management 80 2134
Fearnside P M 1997 Greenhouse gases from deforestation in
Brazilian Amazonia: net committed emissions Climatic
Change 35 32160
Fearnside P M 2001 Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil Environmental Conservation 28 2338
Ferek R J, Reid J S, Hobbs P V, Blake D R and Liousse C 1998
Emission factors of hydrocarbons, halocarbons, trace gases
and particles from biomass burning in Brazil Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 103 3210718
Foody G 2002 Status of land cover classification accuracy
assessment Remote Sensing of Environment 80 185201
Forman R 1995 Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and
regions Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
FUNATURA 2003 Projecto de establecimento de reservas
particulares do Patromnio natural (RPPNs) no Cerrado
Brasileiro PNUD BRA/00/G35 (http://www.funatura.org.br)
Accessed 1 July
Furley P A 1994 Savanna formations: ecology and environment
Progress in Physical Geography 18 27694
Furley P A 1996 The influence of slope on the nature and distribution of soils and plan communities in the central Brazilian Cerrado in Anderson M G and Brooks S eds Advances in
hillslope processes Wiley, Chichester 32746
Furley P A 1999 The nature and diversity of neotropical
savanna vegetation with particular attention to the Brazilian
Cerrados Global Ecology and Biogeography 8 22341
Global Environment Facility (GEF) 2003 Brazil-establishment of
private national heritage reserves in the Brazilian Cerrado
(http://www.gefonline.org/projectDetails.cfm?projID=868)
Accessed 1 July
Goedert W J 1983 Management of the Cerrado soils of Brazil:
a review Journal of Soil Science 34 40528
Goodland R and Pollard R 1973 The Brazilian Cerrado vegetation: a fertility gradient Journal of Ecology 61 21924
Government of Brasil and FUNATURA 1999 Aes Prioritrias
para a Conservao da Biodiversidade do Cerrado e Pantanal
(http://www.bdt.fat.org.br/workshop /cerrado/br/ )
Accessed
1 July 2003
Hall A 1997 Sustaining Amazonia: grassroots action for productive conservation Manchester University Press, Manchester
Henderson-Sellers A and McGuffie K 1995 Global climate
models and dynamic vegetation changes Global Change
Biology 1 6375
Jensen J 1996 Introductory digital image processing Prentice
Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Jepson W 2003 A political ecology of land-use and land-cover
change in the central Brazilian savannas of eastern Mato
Grosso since 1970 Unpublished doctoral dissertation Department of Geography, University of California Los Angeles
Joly C A, Aidar M P, Klink C A, McGrath D G, Moreira A G,
Moutinho P, Nepstad D C, Oliveira A A, Pott A, Rodal M J N

110

Reconsidering land-cover change in the Brazilian savanna

and Sampaio E V S B 1999 Evolution of the Brazilian phytogeography classification systems: implications for biodiversity
conservation Cincia e Cultura 51 33148
Kaufman J B, Cummings D L and Ward D E 1994 Relationship
of fire, biomass and nutrient dynamics along a vegetation
gradient in the Brazilian Cerrado Journal of Ecology 82 51931
Kirchhoff V and Alvala P C 1996 Overview of an aircraft expedition into the Brazilian Cerrado for the observation of
atmospheric trace gases Journal of Geophysical ResearchAtmospheres 101 2397381
Kisselle K W, Zepp R G, Burke R A, Pinto A D, Bustamante M
M C, Opsahl S, Varella R F and Viana L T 2002 Seasonal
soil fluxes of carbon monoxide in burned and unburned Brazilian savannas Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres
107 1829
Klink C A and Moreira A G 2002 Past and current human
occupation and land use in Oliveira P S and Marquis R J eds
The Cerrados of Brazil: ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna Columbia University Press, New York 69
88
Klink C A, Moreira A G and Solbrig O T 1993 Ecological
impact of agricultural development in the Brazilian Cerrado
in Young M D and Solbrig O T eds The worlds savannas.
Economic driving forces, ecological constraints and policy
options for sustainable land use Parthenon Publishing, London 25983
Lake A 1999 Reserving judgment: a critical examination of
RPPN policy in the Cerrados of Brazil Unpublished masters
thesis Department of Geography, University of Edinburgh
Lardy L C, Brossard M, Lopes Assad M L and Laurent J-Y 2002
Carbon and phosphorus stocks of clayey Ferralsols in Cerrado
native and agroecosystems, Brazil Agriculture, Ecosystems
and Environment 92 14758
Lucas R M, Honzak M, Amaral I D, Curran P J and Foody G M
2002 Forest regeneration on abandoned clearances in central
Amazonia International Journal of Remote Sensing 25 965
88
Mantovani J E and Pereira A 1998 Estimativa da integradidade
da cobertura vegetal do cerrado/pantanal atravs de dados
TM/Landsat Simpsio Brasiliero de Sensoriamento Remoto,
9 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, So Jose dos
Campos
Mares M A, Ernest K A and Gettinger D D 1986 Small mammal community structure and composition in the Cerrado
province of central Brazil Journal of Tropical Ecology 2 289
399
Marini M A 2001 Effects of forest fragmentation on birds of the
Cerrado region, Brazil Bird Conservation International 11 13
25
McCracken S, Brondizio E, Nelson D, Moran E, Siqueira A and
Rodriguez-Pedraza C 1999 Remote sensing and GIS at farm
property level: demography and deforestation in the Brazilian
Amazon Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing
65 131120
Mertens B and Lambin E F 2000 Land-cover change trajectories
in southern Camaroon Annals of the Association of American
Geographers 90 46794

Miranda H S and Miranda A C 2000 Queimadas e estoques de

carbono no Cerrado in Moreira A G and Schwartzman S eds
As Mudanas Climticas Globais e os Ecossistemas Brasileiros IPAM, Braslia, DF 7588
Mistry J 1998 Fire in the Cerrado (savannas) of Brazil: an
ecological review Progress in Physical Geography 22 425
48
Mistry J 2000 Savannas Progress in Physical Geography 24
2739
Mittermeier R A, Myers N and Mittermeier C 2000 Hotspots:
Earths biologically richest and most endangered ecoregions
CEMEX, Mexico City
Mittermeier R A, Myers N, Thomsen J B, Fonseca G A B and
Olivieri S 1998 Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities
Conservation Biology 12 51620
Moran E F and Brondizio E 1998 Land-use change after deforestation in Amazonia in Liverman D, Moran E F, Rindfuss R
R and Stern P C eds People and pixels: linking remote sensing and social science National Academy Press, Washington
DC 94121
Moran E F, Brondizio E, Mausel P and Wu Y 1994 Integrating
Amazonia vegetation, land-use, and satellite data: attention
to differential patterns and rates of secondary succession can
inform future policies Bioscience 44 32938
Moran E F, Packer A, Brondizio E and Tucker J 1996 Restoration of vegetation cover in the eastern Amazon Ecological
Economics 18 4154
Myers N, Mittermeier R A, Mittermeier C, Fonseca G A B and
Kentand J 2000 Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities Nature 403 8538
Oliveira-Filho A T and Ratter J 2002 Vegetation physiognomies
and woody flora of the Cerrado biome in Oliveira P S and
Marquis R J eds The Cerrados of Brazil: ecology and natural
history of a neotropical savanna Columbia University Press,
New York 91120
Oliveira-Filho A T, Shepherd G J, Martins F R and Stubblebine
W H 1989 Environmental factors affecting physiognomic and
floristic variation in an area of Cerrado in central Brazil Journal of Tropical Ecology 5 41331
Passos M M 1998 Amaznia: teledeteo e colonisao Editora
UNESP, So Paulo
Perz S G and Walker R T 2002 Household life cycles and secondary forest cover among small farm colonists in the Amazon World Development 30 100927
Pinto A D, Bustamante M M C, Kisselle K, Burke R, Zepp R,
Viana L T, Varella R F and Molina M 2002 Soil emissions of
N2O, NO, and CO2 in Brazilian savannas: effects of vegetation type, seasonality, and prescribed fires Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 107 5765
Pivello V R, Shida C N and Meirelles S T 1999 Alien grasses in
Brazilian savanna: a threat to the biodiversity Biodiversity
and Conservation 8 128194
Ratter J A, Ribeiro J F and Bridgewater S 1997 The Brazilian
Cerrado vegetation and threats to biodiversity Annals of Botany 80 22330
Redford K H and Fonseca G A B 1986 The role of gallery

Reconsidering land-cover change in the Brazilian savanna

forests in the zoogeography of the Cerrados non-volant
mammalian fauna Biotropic 18 12635
Ribeiro J F and Walter B M T 1998 Fitofisionomies do bioma
Cerrado in Sano S M and Almeida S P eds Cerrado: Ambiente e Flora EMBRAPA, Planaltina, DF 89166
Robbins P 2001 Fixed categories in a portable landscape: the
causes and consequences of land-cover categorization Environment and Planning A 33 16179
Silberbauer Gottsberger I and Gottsberger G 1984 Cerrado
cerrado: a comparison with respect to number of species
and growth forms Phytocoenologia 12 293303
Silva J M C and Bates J M 2002 Biogeographic patterns and
conservation in the South American Cerrado: a tropical
savanna hotspot BioScience 52 22534
Southworth J and Tucker C 2001 The influence of accessibility,
local institutions, and socioeconomic factors on forest cover
change in the mountains of western Honduras Mountain
Research and Development 21 27683
Steininger M K 1996 Tropical secondary forest regrowth in the
Amazon: age, area and change estimation with Thematic
Mapper data International Journal of Remote Sensing 17 9
27

111

Steininger M K 2000 Satellite estimation of tropical secondary

forest above-ground biomass: data from Brazil and Bolivia
International Journal of Remote Sensing 21 113957
Tubelis D P and Cavelcanti R B 2000 A comparison of bird
communities in natural and disturbed non-wetland open habitats in the Cerrados central region, Brazil Bird Conservation
International 10 33150
Vourlitis G L, Priante N, Hayashi M M S, Nogueira J D,
Caseiro F T and Campelo J H 2001 Seasonal variations in the
net ecosystem CO2 exchange of a mature Amazonian transitional tropical forest (cerradao) Functional Ecology 15 38895
Warnken P F 1999 The development and growth of the soybean industry in Brazil Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA
Wood A, Stedman-Edwards P and Mang J 2000 The root
causes of biodiversity loss Earthscan, Sterling, VA
Woodwell G M 2002 On purpose in science, conservation and
government Ambio 31 4326
WWF-Brasil 2000 Expanso Agrcola e Perda da Biodiversidade
no Cerrado WWF-Brasil, Braslia, DF
Zarin D J, Ducey M J, Tucker J and Salas W A 2001 Potential
biomass accumulation in Amazonian regrowth forests Ecosystems 4 65868